Religions > Atheism > Women Tell Poll: Don't Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
15 Jan 2006 07:35:22 PM |
| Object: |
Women Tell Poll: Don't Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat1991.html
Women Tell Poll: Don't Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A new poll reveals that Americans don't
think Judge Samuel Alito should be disqualified from serving on the Supreme
Court if he is pro-life on the issue of abortion. This is despite repeated
questioning from pro-abortion members of the Senate Judiciary Committee
trying to trap the nominee into saying more than he should on the issue.
Conducted by the Public Opinion Strategies polling firm, the survey found 70
percent of women and 71 percent of men said Judge Alito should not be
disqualified from serving on the U.S. Supreme Court if he is pro-life on
abortion.
In general, respondents indicated that a well-qualified nominee for the
Supreme Court should not be disqualified from serving for holding pro-life
views. Some 66 percent of women and 71 percent of men agreed.
The Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life women's political group, sponsored the
survey and SBA List president Marjorie Dannenfelser said it shows that
Americans of all political stripes don't want pro-life nominees
disqualified.
"Our poll clearly shows that the majority of Americans, whether they are
women or men, pro-life or pro-choice, republican or democrat, are regular
church attenders or almost never go, do not believe a Supreme Court nominee
should be disqualified if they are pro-life," she explained.
The poll found that even 56 percent of those who self-identified as
"pro-choice" said Alito's position on abortion should not disqualify him
from serving on the U.S. Supreme Court.
"The majority of Americans, including American women, want judges to enforce
laws passed by the people and their elected representatives," Dannenfelser
said. "They don't want judges making up laws from the bench."
--
"Honesty, Integrity, Compassion, and Decency"
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
15 Jan 2006 08:25:15 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to ruber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 02:15:26 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cb040b$0$58108$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to ruber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
On the contrary, they are a highly reputable source. You attempt to negate
anything that refutes your beliefs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 02:41:01 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cb040b$0$58108$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to ruber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
On the contrary, they are a highly reputable source. You attempt to negate
anything that refutes your beliefs.
You misspelled "highly predictable", IBenGettinHighAgain...if it's claimed by
Lifenews, the odds are highly in favor of it being anything but factual.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, San Antonio 1 (January 15)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 20 vs. Rochester, 7:35
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 03:55:57 PM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvewjq52a.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cb040b$0$58108$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to ruber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
On the contrary, they are a highly reputable source. You attempt to
negate
anything that refutes your beliefs.
You misspelled "highly predictable", IBenGettinHighAgain...if it's claimed
by
Lifenews, the odds are highly in favor of it being anything but factual.
You base this on what, anonymous person hiding behind a nym?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 08:22:45 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvewjq52a.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cb040b$0$58108$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to ruber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
On the contrary, they are a highly reputable source. You attempt to negate
anything that refutes your beliefs.
You misspelled "highly predictable", IBenGettinHighAgain...if it's claimed
by Lifenews, the odds are highly in favor of it being anything but factual.
You base this on what, anonymous person hiding behind a nym?
By actually visiting their charade of a site - the only important distinction
to the loons there is whether someone's pro-choice or not. Apparently, you
have a few comrades there who have as little experience in dealing with
reality as you do. (Meanwhile, what hiding behind a nym? I've made my name
pretty damned clear since 1989, as anyone with enough sense to understand what
they read can see in the .sig below, which I include in any article I post.
Maybe you'll figure it out some day...preferably before the heat death of the
universe.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, San Antonio 1 (January 15)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 20 vs. Rochester, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 04:31:13 PM |
|
|
Schizophrenic troll "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:XfednVjAOdnvi1HeRVn-vQ@giganews.com...
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkvewjq52a.fsf@fnord.io.com...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> writes:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cb040b$0$58108$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one
issue influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to ruber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
On the contrary, they are a highly reputable source. You attempt to
negate anything that refutes your beliefs.
You misspelled "highly predictable", IBenGettinHighAgain...if it's
claimed by Lifenews, the odds are highly in favor of it being anything
but factual.
You base this on what, anonymous person hiding behind a nym?
Now THAT'S funny, coming from IBenCookingUpMoreNymsThanIQPoints.
LC~ Glad to have switched over to 'JYoung proof' irony meters.
"I've learned changing to a different Id is no big deal, just like changing
a computer is no big
deal. I can post from a different computer every day for years and
never use the same computer twice, and it will not cost me one dime.
You want to play a game of harrassment, I guarantee you that not only
will I harrass the hell out of you, but I'll harrass the hell out of
anyone who even attempts to communicate with you. Don't try me boy.
Everyday a different computer, everyday a different Id (those may have
to be repeated after I run out of names and numbers with my free
accounts with hotmail and yahoo and volcanomail and msn ect...) which
will render a killfile absolutely useless.( p.s. I'll still be able to
post harrassment-free with a different ID, so there is no possible way
for you to win )" ~ J "IBenMeltingDown" Young, busted for yet another
nymshift.
From: "simon sez" <simonsez@volcanomail.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.politics.homosexuality,seattle.politics,tx.politics
Subject: Re: 'simon sez' has a message for 'LC'
Date: 19 Aug 2005 11:18:50 -0700
Message-ID: <1124475530.860458.5110@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 02:29:50 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to rubber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
On the contrary, they are a highly reputable source.
*****. I found a lie within 4 seconds of looking at their web
site.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 08:29:00 PM |
|
|
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc023e$0$58042$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to rubber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
On the contrary, they are a highly reputable source.
*****. I found a lie within 4 seconds of looking at their web
site.
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 09:06:43 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:n4adnUdpWeP0y1HeRVn-ig@comcast.com...
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc023e$0$58042$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
It seems that American women want quality and do not let any one
issue
influence what they deem as the best candidate available.
But Republicans are going to rubber-stamp Bush's selection anyway.
http://www.lifenews.com
Pro-liars. Utterly untrustworthy.
On the contrary, they are a highly reputable source.
*****. I found a lie within 4 seconds of looking at their web
site.
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in; one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important than
inconvenience.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
16 Jan 2006 11:38:58 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in; one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important than
inconvenience.
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
17 Jan 2006 12:28:59 AM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in; one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
17 Jan 2006 12:57:35 AM |
|
|
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in; one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
So you support a woman's choice to kill the fetus at any point in the
pregnancy?
After birth, the fetus is considered a child right?
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
I have to wonder what sad life you must lead or what abuses you faced
growing up to lead you to view the unborn child as a "parasite".
I suppose you think a woman is enslaved by pregnancy as well right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
17 Jan 2006 09:23:09 AM |
|
|
In article <1137481055.119201.47950@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in; one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
So you support a woman's choice to kill the fetus at any point in the
pregnancy?
After birth, the fetus is considered a child right?
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? After birth it
can live on its own.
I have to wonder what sad life you must lead or what abuses you faced
growing up to lead you to view the unborn child as a "parasite".
Explain this:
³We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revealing
tight tops and that isn't distractive, but it's a distraction if a girl
has the confederate flag on her purse?³
- A comment made by Robert ³Osprey² Heishman in which he accidentally
admits to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops
while arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol.
(January 10, 2006)
<http://groups.google.com/group/alt.abortion/browse_thread/thread/e4417a
f6119147c5/1177613f915079b0?lnk=st&q=We+can+allow+girls+to+go+to+school+
in+short+mini+skirts+and+revealing+group%3Aalt.abortion+author%3AOsprey&
rnum=3&hl=en#1177613f915079b0>
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
17 Jan 2006 11:49:57 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:170120060723085659%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <1137481055.119201.47950@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important
than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
So you support a woman's choice to kill the fetus at any point in the
pregnancy?
After birth, the fetus is considered a child right?
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? After birth it
can live on its own.
His words were "survive". You show me one child after birth that can survive
on his or her own, without the aid of a human to take care of him or her.
I have to wonder what sad life you must lead or what abuses you faced
growing up to lead you to view the unborn child as a "parasite".
Explain this:
³We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revealing
tight tops and that isn't distractive, but it's a distraction if a girl
has the confederate flag on her purse?³
- A comment made by Robert ³Osprey² Heishman in which he accidentally
admits to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops
while arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol.
(January 10, 2006)
Explain why you have to lie. I didn't admit to being turned on by school
girls.
Explain why you are the one who is turned on since you are the one who is
thinking about it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
17 Jan 2006 08:54:00 PM |
|
|
In article <xOKdneM_wcpYsFDenZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:170120060723085659%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <1137481055.119201.47950@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important
than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
So you support a woman's choice to kill the fetus at any point in the
pregnancy?
After birth, the fetus is considered a child right?
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? After birth it
can live on its own.
His words were "survive". You show me one child after birth that can survive
on his or her own, without the aid of a human to take care of him or her.
After birth it can survive on its own. It the context here it means
"without the mother." Your constant attempts at parsing words proves
how desperate you are.
I have to wonder what sad life you must lead or what abuses you faced
growing up to lead you to view the unborn child as a "parasite".
Explain this:
³We can allow girls to go to school in short mini skirts and revealing
tight tops and that isn't distractive, but it's a distraction if a girl
has the confederate flag on her purse?³
- A comment made by Robert ³Osprey² Heishman in which he accidentally
admits to being turned on by school girls in mini skirts and tight tops
while arguing that the Confederate Flag is not a racist symbol.
(January 10, 2006)
Explain why you have to lie. I didn't admit to being turned on by school
girls.
Looks that way to me. What did you mean if not that?
Explain why you are the one who is turned on since you are the one who is
thinking about it.
I guess by that "thinking," the Democrats are the ones guilty of
bribery because they keep talking about how the Republicans are taking
bribes.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
17 Jan 2006 11:57:08 AM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:170120060723085659%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <1137481055.119201.47950@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important
than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
So you support a woman's choice to kill the fetus at any point in the
pregnancy?
After birth, the fetus is considered a child right?
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? After birth it
can live on its own.
His words were "survive". You show me one child after birth that can survive
on his or her own, without the aid of a human to take care of him or her.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? Nobody is
forced to care for a child. Anybody willing can provide care.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
18 Jan 2006 10:14:17 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cd2ff4$0$58110$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:170120060723085659%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <1137481055.119201.47950@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child
with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more
important
than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
So you support a woman's choice to kill the fetus at any point in the
pregnancy?
After birth, the fetus is considered a child right?
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? After birth it
can live on its own.
His words were "survive". You show me one child after birth that can
survive
on his or her own, without the aid of a human to take care of him or her.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? Nobody is
forced to care for a child. Anybody willing can provide care.
Nice dodge Ray.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
18 Jan 2006 10:32:52 PM |
|
|
In article <AmEzf.8921$NE.5068@dukeread12>, Reasoned Insanity
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cd2ff4$0$58110$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:170120060723085659%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <1137481055.119201.47950@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child
with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more
important
than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
So you support a woman's choice to kill the fetus at any point in the
pregnancy?
After birth, the fetus is considered a child right?
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? After birth it
can live on its own.
His words were "survive". You show me one child after birth that can
survive
on his or her own, without the aid of a human to take care of him or her.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? Nobody is
forced to care for a child. Anybody willing can provide care.
Nice dodge Ray.
From the master liar and dodger.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
18 Jan 2006 10:20:55 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:14:17 -0600, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cd2ff4$0$58110$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:170120060723085659%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <1137481055.119201.47950@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:43cc82f2$0$58094$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child
with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more
important
than
inconvenience.
There is no 'child within'. There is a fetus that may or
may not be able to survive outside the woman's body.
Until it reaches the point where it can survive on its
own, it is merely a parasite living off the woman's body.
Whether or not she wants it to develop to the point
where a viable baby is delivered is completely up to
the woman whose body the parasite is using.
So you support a woman's choice to kill the fetus at any point in the
pregnancy?
After birth, the fetus is considered a child right?
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? After birth it
can live on its own.
His words were "survive". You show me one child after birth that can
survive
on his or her own, without the aid of a human to take care of him or her.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? Nobody is
forced to care for a child. Anybody willing can provide care.
Nice dodge Ray.
What's a dodge? Anyone who doesn't understand the basic fact that a
fetus requires a far different level and kind of care than a newborn
does has no worthwhile opinion to offer on the matter.
---
I bought a Venus Fly Trap today. I was going to name it
‘Republican’, but the fly trap is beneficial to the
environment. I’ll save that name - someday I might find
a plant that eats poor people and minorities.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
18 Jan 2006 11:39:09 PM |
|
|
Reasoned Insanity <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@sonic.net> wrote in message
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
However, this child is NOt able to survive on his or her own, they need
a person to support the child..feeding, clothing, shelter. According
to your own statement, since the child is not able to survive on its
own you support the death of the child, if the mother so chooses to
kill the child.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? After birth it
can live on its own.
His words were "survive". You show me one child after birth that can
survive
on his or her own, without the aid of a human to take care of him or her.
How could a moron like you even get a job as a guard? Nobody is
forced to care for a child. Anybody willing can provide care.
Nice dodge Ray.
What "dodge", pro-liar?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life onAbortion |
17 Jan 2006 05:43:58 PM |
|
|
osprey lied:
lie
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
17 Jan 2006 01:25:24 AM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in; one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important than
inconvenience.
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
When will you give up your money, your conveniences, your property,
your freedom, and your health?
You seem to think it's o.k. for Ray Fischer to always ask others what
they do....so let's find out what Ray Fischer does.
Tell us Ray, what do you do to help others?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life on Abortion |
17 Jan 2006 09:23:09 AM |
|
|
In article <1137482723.995531.15290@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in; one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important than
inconvenience.
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
When will you give up your money, your conveniences, your property,
your freedom, and your health?
Osprey always thinks that all he has to do is side step his hatred.
You seem to think it's o.k. for Ray Fischer to always ask others what
they do....so let's find out what Ray Fischer does.
No - lets find out what YOU would do, you chicken ***** little guard.
Tell us Ray, what do you do to help others?
Because we already know Osprey's philosophy - kill them if they don't
do as they are told.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Duca" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life onAbortion |
18 Jan 2006 03:24:48 AM |
|
|
in article 1137482723.995531.15290@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com wrote on 1/17/06 2:25 AM:
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in; one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important than
inconvenience.
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
When will you give up your money, your conveniences, your property,
your freedom, and your health?
You seem to think it's o.k. for Ray Fischer to always ask others what
they do....so let's find out what Ray Fischer does.
Tell us Ray, what do you do to help others?
What does Osprey do, other than telling them to pray to his Catholic
God?
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life onAbortion |
18 Jan 2006 06:14:58 AM |
|
|
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFF37390.2EF3B%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article 1137482723.995531.15290@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com wrote on 1/17/06 2:25 AM:
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important
than
inconvenience.
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
When will you give up your money, your conveniences, your property,
your freedom, and your health?
You seem to think it's o.k. for Ray Fischer to always ask others what
they do....so let's find out what Ray Fischer does.
Tell us Ray, what do you do to help others?
What does Osprey do, other than telling them to pray to his
Catholic
God?
Catholic God?
Boy are you barking up the wrong tree.
So you guys are so ashamed to say that you feel the need to try and turn the
tables.
My point has been made...people on the pro-choice side do nothing to help
others.
Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life onAbortion |
18 Jan 2006 09:35:01 AM |
|
|
In article <fd6dnZGkip8trVPeRVn-vg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFF37390.2EF3B%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article 1137482723.995531.15290@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com wrote on 1/17/06 2:25 AM:
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more important
than
inconvenience.
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
When will you give up your money, your conveniences, your property,
your freedom, and your health?
You seem to think it's o.k. for Ray Fischer to always ask others what
they do....so let's find out what Ray Fischer does.
Tell us Ray, what do you do to help others?
What does Osprey do, other than telling them to pray to his
Catholic
God?
Catholic God?
Boy are you barking up the wrong tree.
So you guys are so ashamed to say that you feel the need to try and turn the
tables.
My point has been made...
Yeah - You are a hypocrite who preaches forcing women to give birth
against their will and does nothing for the child afterwards.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life onAbortion |
18 Jan 2006 10:11:35 AM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:180120060735011608%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <fd6dnZGkip8trVPeRVn-vg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFF37390.2EF3B%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article 1137482723.995531.15290@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, osprey
at
noneedtoknow@mail.com wrote on 1/17/06 2:25 AM:
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child
with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more
important
than
inconvenience.
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
When will you give up your money, your conveniences, your property,
your freedom, and your health?
You seem to think it's o.k. for Ray Fischer to always ask others what
they do....so let's find out what Ray Fischer does.
Tell us Ray, what do you do to help others?
What does Osprey do, other than telling them to pray to his
Catholic
God?
Catholic God?
Boy are you barking up the wrong tree.
So you guys are so ashamed to say that you feel the need to try and turn
the
tables.
My point has been made...
Yeah
Correct...you do absolutely NOTHING for anyone else you selfish *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life onAbortion |
19 Jan 2006 11:03:26 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> writes:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:180120060735011608%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <fd6dnZGkip8trVPeRVn-vg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
[...]
Catholic God?
Boy are you barking up the wrong tree.
So you guys are so ashamed to say that you feel the need to try and turn
the
tables.
My point has been made...
Yeah
Correct...you do absolutely NOTHING for anyone else you selfish *****.
Whine about it all you want to...what you can't do is actually prove it.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, San Antonio 1 (January 15)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 20 vs. Rochester, 7:35
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life onAbortion |
18 Jan 2006 09:25:10 PM |
|
|
In article <T82dnVFlpYfb9VPeRVn-ug@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:180120060735011608%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <fd6dnZGkip8trVPeRVn-vg@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Paul Duca" <p.duca@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BFF37390.2EF3B%p.duca@comcast.net...
in article 1137482723.995531.15290@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, osprey
at
noneedtoknow@mail.com wrote on 1/17/06 2:25 AM:
Ray Fischer wrote:
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
True. What women say to disqualify Alito if he's in
favor of womens' rights? Only the fundy religious
maniacs. And, we all know that they are in the
minority. Any poll that says otherwise lies.
You are confusing women's rights with the right of the child
with-in;
one
need not follow any religion to view life itself to be more
important
than
inconvenience.
And when will you be giving up your money, your conveniences, your
property, your freedom, and your health so that others might live?
When will you give up your money, your conveniences, your property,
your freedom, and your health?
You seem to think it's o.k. for Ray Fischer to always ask others what
they do....so let's find out what Ray Fischer does.
Tell us Ray, what do you do to help others?
What does Osprey do, other than telling them to pray to his
Catholic
God?
Catholic God?
Boy are you barking up the wrong tree.
So you guys are so ashamed to say that you feel the need to try and turn
the
tables.
My point has been made...
Yeah
Correct...you do absolutely NOTHING for anyone else you selfish *****.
Osprey continues to forge the posts of those who kick his *****.
What I ACTUALLY SAID:
Yeah - You are a hypocrite who preaches forcing women to give birth
against their will and does nothing for the child afterwards.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Women Tell Poll: Disqualify Samuel Alito if He's Pro-Life onAbortion |
18 Jan 2006 10:24:59 AM |
|
|
osprey lied:
NOTHING
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
