| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"|-|erc" |
| Date: |
30 Dec 2003 09:01:38 PM |
| Object: |
Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net)
Subject: Re: Test |-|erc (was Re: A test proposal for Herc)
View this article only
Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell, sci.skeptic, sci.math
Date: 2003-10-06 21:13:17 PST
On 6 Oct 2003 05:57:21 -0700, (Eric
Hocking) wrote in alt.fan.art-bell:
Herc,
Just so we all know what we are attempting here, can you please
clarify your claimed "powers".
How about we just drop the whole thing down a well, and then fill the
well with concrete?
--
V.G.
.
|
|
| User: "darktalon" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 07:51:06 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message news:<nVqIb.111$EM4.2805@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>...
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
< http://www.kleimo.com/random/name.cfm >
Be my guest.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "*nemo*" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 04:28:05 AM |
|
|
In article <nVqIb.111$EM4.2805@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>,
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net)
Subject: Re: Test |-|erc (was Re: A test proposal for Herc)
View this article only
Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell, sci.skeptic, sci.math
Date: 2003-10-06 21:13:17 PST
On 6 Oct 2003 05:57:21 -0700, (Eric
Hocking) wrote in alt.fan.art-bell:
Herc,
Just so we all know what we are attempting here, can you please
clarify your claimed "powers".
How about we just drop the whole thing down a well, and then fill the
well with concrete?
--
V.G.
Yeah... we're real impressed here, herc. Now go play with your mind. You
obviously like toys as simple as possible.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mekkala" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 09:31:07 AM |
|
|
On 30 Dec 2003, "|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> screwed up his
face, groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:nVqIb.111$EM4.2805@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au:
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Herc, I hate to tell you this, but there's truly nothing unusual about that
post at all.
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"Atheism is ... the bed-rock of sanity in a world of madness."
--Emmett F. Fields
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 03:22:55 PM |
|
|
"Mekkala" <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Herc, I hate to tell you this, but there's truly nothing unusual about that
post at all.
who agrees with Mekkala?
I think most people given a list of names would pick Vanilla Gorilla
with posting "pour cement on a dude down a well"
vanilla = white = concrete
concrete on person
person = gorrilla
concrete a person = vanilla a gorilla
Its enough of a clue to guess the name, that's all I need to guess peoples names
from a test booth.
IS IT ENOUGH OF A CLUE TO GUESS THE NAME OR NOT?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Irony Alert" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 03:37:22 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:22HIb.401$EM4.8229@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
vanilla = white = concrete
concrete on person
person = gorrilla
concrete a person = vanilla a gorilla
Is this what passes for logic in your diminished facilities?
Its enough of a clue to guess the name, that's all I need to guess peoples
names
from a test booth.
Can you guess what I'm thinking you should go do with yourself?
IS IT ENOUGH OF A CLUE TO GUESS THE NAME OR NOT?
Why are you asking about clues? You have received them by the dozen and yet
you persist.
--
The Usenet Irony Alert
Serving alt.fan.art-bell since 2003
Roymond Karcrashski is just my sock
Felony case "02-CR-0617 9/1/03: Oregon Department of
Justice V. Raymond Ronald Karczewski, Defendant.
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 03:57:07 PM |
|
|
IS IT ENOUGH OF A CLUE TO GUESS THE NAME OR NOT?
Stop asking me to explain the claim if you then don't listen.
Just answer truthfully here and there
The claim is replies to me have clues in them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Irony Alert" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 03:57:47 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:5yHIb.407$EM4.8451@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
IS IT ENOUGH OF A CLUE TO GUESS THE NAME OR NOT?
Stop asking me to explain the claim if you then don't listen.
Just answer truthfully here and there
The claim is replies to me have clues in them.
You wouldn't know a clue if someone beat you to death with one.
--
The Usenet Irony Alert
Serving alt.fan.art-bell since 2003
Roymond Karcrashski is just my sock
Felony case "02-CR-0617 9/1/03: Oregon Department of
Justice V. Raymond Ronald Karczewski, Defendant.
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 04:18:47 PM |
|
|
--
"Irony Alert" <Driver@StealthTrucks.COM> wrote in
IS IT ENOUGH OF A CLUE TO GUESS THE NAME OR NOT?
Stop asking me to explain the claim if you then don't listen.
Just answer truthfully here and there
The claim is replies to me have clues in them.
You wouldn't know a clue if someone beat you to death with one.
Why can't you answer the question.
you're one to talk who need 5 posts to explain my email.
Herc
thisisdifferenttotheotherone@wwwadamskingdom.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Irony Alert" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 04:23:17 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:pSHIb.3$VJ5.496@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
--
"Irony Alert" <Driver@StealthTrucks.COM> wrote in
IS IT ENOUGH OF A CLUE TO GUESS THE NAME OR NOT?
Stop asking me to explain the claim if you then don't listen.
Just answer truthfully here and there
The claim is replies to me have clues in them.
You wouldn't know a clue if someone beat you to death with one.
Why can't you answer the question.
you're one to talk who need 5 posts to explain my email.
Your patent lack of cogent language mechanics is your problem, not mine.
--
The Usenet Irony Alert
Serving alt.fan.art-bell since 2003
Roymond Karcrashski is just my sock
Felony case "02-CR-0617 9/1/03: Oregon Department of
Justice V. Raymond Ronald Karczewski, Defendant.
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 04:31:00 PM |
|
|
You wouldn't know a clue if someone beat you to death with one.
Why can't you answer the question.
you're one to talk who need 5 posts to explain my email.
Your patent lack of cogent language mechanics is your problem, not mine.
you STILL can't answer the question.
you figured out my email yet?
you know what TRY ME FORM @ WWW ADAMSKINGDOM.COM means?
you know what USE MY ONLINE FORM @ WWW ADAMSKINGDOM.COM means?
I told you to read the email, that's there should be dot after www, you still complained
that they're DIFFERENT EMAILS
what a loser
.
|
|
|
| User: "Irony Alert" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 05:01:08 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:S1IIb.7$VJ5.398@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
You wouldn't know a clue if someone beat you to death with one.
Why can't you answer the question.
you're one to talk who need 5 posts to explain my email.
Your patent lack of cogent language mechanics is your problem, not mine.
you STILL can't answer the question.
I'm the one asking questions here, Duckboi.
you figured out my email yet?
Why would I want to email you?
you know what means?
you know what means?
It means the spambots are going to harvest them.
I told you to read the email, that's there should be dot after www, you
still complained
that they're DIFFERENT EMAILS
*sighs* I don't care how many email addresses you have, you're still a
kook, a spammer, and a flood poster.
what a loser
Projection noted.
--
The Usenet Irony Alert
Serving alt.fan.art-bell since 2003
Roymond Karcrashski is just my sock
Felony case "02-CR-0617 9/1/03: Oregon Department of
Justice V. Raymond Ronald Karczewski, Defendant.
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 05:15:15 PM |
|
|
you know what means?
you know what means?
It means the spambots are going to harvest them.
he's still got it wrong
wwwadamskingdom.com isn't a .com you idiot
.
|
|
|
| User: "Irony Alert" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 05:26:20 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:lHIIb.13$VJ5.78@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
you know what means?
you know what means?
It means the spambots are going to harvest them.
he's still got it wrong
wwwadamskingdom.com isn't a .com you idiot
Then why end it with a .com, Duckboi?
It's become glaringly apparent that not only do you not understand the
concept of a .com domain, but you cannot discern between your original post
and modifications made by a second party in their reply.
I strongly suggest that you remove the tourniquet from your neck for a few
hours before you start quacking again, Duckboi.
--
The Usenet Irony Alert
Serving alt.fan.art-bell since 2003
Roymond Karcrashski is just my sock
Felony case "02-CR-0617 9/1/03: Oregon Department of
Justice V. Raymond Ronald Karczewski, Defendant.
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 06:28:12 PM |
|
|
stupidity snipped
.
|
|
|
| User: "Irony Alert" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 06:48:00 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote in message
news:KLJIb.69$VJ5.1547@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
stupidity snipped
Evasion noted.
--
The Usenet Irony Alert
Serving alt.fan.art-bell since 2003
Roymond Karcrashski is just my sock
Felony case "02-CR-0617 9/1/03: Oregon Department of
Justice V. Raymond Ronald Karczewski, Defendant.
"The defendant's name is NOT copyrighted."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
02 Jan 2004 12:30:06 PM |
|
|
In article <KLJIb.69$VJ5.1547@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>, |-|erc says...
stupidity snipped
I guess this means that you just snipped your own post.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
02 Jan 2004 11:04:02 AM |
|
|
In article <22HIb.401$EM4.8229@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>, |-|erc says...
"Mekkala" <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Herc, I hate to tell you this, but there's truly nothing unusual about that
post at all.
who agrees with Mekkala?
I think most people given a list of names would pick Vanilla Gorilla
with posting "pour cement on a dude down a well"
vanilla = white = concrete
concrete on person
person = gorrilla
concrete a person = vanilla a gorilla
Its enough of a clue to guess the name, that's all I need to guess peoples names
from a test booth.
IS IT ENOUGH OF A CLUE TO GUESS THE NAME OR NOT?
Herc
Dude - No one gives a flying *****.
Get a life.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 05:47:46 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 07:22:55 +1000, "|-|erc"
<trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
"Mekkala" <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Herc, I hate to tell you this, but there's truly nothing unusual about that
post at all.
who agrees with Mekkala?
I think most people given a list of names would pick Vanilla Gorilla
with posting "pour cement on a dude down a well"
vanilla = white = concrete
concrete on person
person = gorrilla
concrete a person = vanilla a gorilla
Err, no. Most schizophrenics might, but that's another story. Your
bizarre free-association is another indicator that you really need
help.
Its enough of a clue to guess the name, that's all I need to guess peoples names
from a test booth.
IS IT ENOUGH OF A CLUE TO GUESS THE NAME OR NOT?
Herc
---
ROT-13 on Email to reply.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Crisp" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 06:43:46 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 10:47:46 +1100, raven1 wrote
(in message <9un6vvgs3vg5cf1eaneujihq1bvgl2kojc@4ax.com>):
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 07:22:55 +1000, "|-|erc"
<trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
[snip]
vanilla = white = concrete
concrete on person
person = gorrilla
concrete a person = vanilla a gorilla
Err, no. Most schizophrenics might, but that's another story. Your
bizarre free-association is another indicator that you really need
help.
Now, if it had been from The Bauxite Bonobo he might have a point
;-)
Have Fun
Martin
--
aa #1792
Almost always SMASHed
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 06:52:43 PM |
|
|
can you guess his name from a list of a few names OR NOT?
That simple
.
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Crisp" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 07:16:16 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:52:43 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <J6KIb.84$VJ5.1290@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
can you guess his name from a list of a few names OR NOT?
1 in length-of-list times, I would expect.
[Did you mean 'deduce' when you said 'guess'?]
Have Fun
Martin
--
aa #1792
Almost always SMASHed
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 07:24:04 PM |
|
|
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote in
....
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:52:43 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <J6KIb.84$VJ5.1290@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
can you guess his name from a list of a few names OR NOT?
1 in length-of-list times, I would expect.
[Did you mean 'deduce' when you said 'guess'?]
make deductions, then make the best guess out of the options
you word it then
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Crisp" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 07:30:24 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:24:04 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <bAKIb.95$VJ5.1933@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote in
...
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:52:43 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <J6KIb.84$VJ5.1290@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
can you guess his name from a list of a few names OR NOT?
1 in length-of-list times, I would expect.
[Did you mean 'deduce' when you said 'guess'?]
make deductions, then make the best guess out of the options
you word it then
Hey, it's your claim; if you can't communicate it, how do you
expect me to word it accurately? I'm not the one claiming
paranormal ability.
Have Fun
Martin
--
aa #1792
Almost always SMASHed
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
03 Jan 2004 04:25:27 PM |
|
|
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:24:04 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <bAKIb.95$VJ5.1933@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote in
...
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:52:43 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <J6KIb.84$VJ5.1290@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
can you guess his name from a list of a few names OR NOT?
1 in length-of-list times, I would expect.
[Did you mean 'deduce' when you said 'guess'?]
make deductions, then make the best guess out of the options
you word it then
Hey, it's your claim; if you can't communicate it, how do you
expect me to word it accurately? I'm not the one claiming
paranormal ability.
Because you worked it out it literally means deduce not guess. Therefore
you understand it. Replies to me have clues in them that enable anyone
to deduce the alias just from the message in test conditions.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Crisp" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 05:21:53 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 9:25:27 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <K21Jb.9$FD6.407@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:24:04 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <bAKIb.95$VJ5.1933@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote in
...
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:52:43 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <J6KIb.84$VJ5.1290@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
can you guess his name from a list of a few names OR NOT?
1 in length-of-list times, I would expect.
[Did you mean 'deduce' when you said 'guess'?]
make deductions, then make the best guess out of the options
you word it then
Hey, it's your claim; if you can't communicate it, how do you
expect me to word it accurately? I'm not the one claiming
paranormal ability.
Because you worked it out it literally means deduce not guess. Therefore
you understand it. Replies to me have clues in them that enable anyone
to deduce the alias just from the message in test conditions.
Anyone... except for me, the three people I tried your test on,
and the rest of usenet.
Your claim is patent nonsense. Your argument in favour of your
claim is weak. Your evidence of your claim weaker still. And the
claim fails when actually tested.
Get the psychiatric help you so obviously need.
Have Fun
Martin
--
aa #1792
Almost always SMASHed
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 05:44:14 PM |
|
|
LIAR
J o i n I n T h e 1 s t O n l i n e N e w Y e a r s B a s h !
<^> <(·¿·)> <^> ---- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> 2004 <^> <(·¿·)> <^> --- <^> <(·¿·)> <^>
Chat at www.chatty.net THE NEW YEARS ONLINE PARTY!!
<^> <(·¿·)> <^> ---- <^> <(·¿·)> <^> 2004 <^> <(·¿·)> <^> --- <^> <(·¿·)> <^>
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BC1AF6C1013527AEF0407600@news.ozemail.com.au...
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 9:25:27 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <K21Jb.9$FD6.407@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 12:24:04 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <bAKIb.95$VJ5.1933@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote in
...
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 11:52:43 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <J6KIb.84$VJ5.1290@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
can you guess his name from a list of a few names OR NOT?
1 in length-of-list times, I would expect.
[Did you mean 'deduce' when you said 'guess'?]
make deductions, then make the best guess out of the options
you word it then
Hey, it's your claim; if you can't communicate it, how do you
expect me to word it accurately? I'm not the one claiming
paranormal ability.
Because you worked it out it literally means deduce not guess. Therefore
you understand it. Replies to me have clues in them that enable anyone
to deduce the alias just from the message in test conditions.
Anyone... except for me, the three people I tried your test on,
and the rest of usenet.
Your claim is patent nonsense. Your argument in favour of your
claim is weak. Your evidence of your claim weaker still. And the
claim fails when actually tested.
Get the psychiatric help you so obviously need.
Have Fun
Martin
--
aa #1792
Almost always SMASHed
.
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Crisp" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 07:19:54 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:44:14 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <Ec2Jb.42$FD6.1374@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
[response moved to bottom]
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BC1AF6C1013527AEF0407600@news.ozemail.com.au...
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 9:25:27 +1100, erc wrote
(in message <K21Jb.9$FD6.407@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au>):
"Martin Crisp" <Spam.Bucket@tesseract.com.au> wrote
[snip]
Hey, it's your claim; if you can't communicate it, how do you
expect me to word it accurately? I'm not the one claiming
paranormal ability.
Because you worked it out it literally means deduce not guess. Therefore
you understand it. Replies to me have clues in them that enable anyone
to deduce the alias just from the message in test conditions.
Anyone... except for me, the three people I tried your test on,
and the rest of usenet.
Your claim is patent nonsense. Your argument in favour of your
claim is weak. Your evidence of your claim weaker still. And the
claim fails when actually tested.
Get the psychiatric help you so obviously need.
LIAR
I might be wrong, but I'm not lying. I have no motive to lie, no
benefit would accrue to me from a lie about your claimed
abilities.
One of my other replies contains a deliberate hint of the type to
which you refer. It will be interesting to see if you pick up on
it.
Have Fun
Martin
--
aa #1792
Almost always SMASHed
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
01 Jan 2004 06:31:03 PM |
|
|
RUBBISH
its an easy guess.
"throwing cement on a guy" by Vanilla Gorilla
It fits my claim. The reply to me gives a clue who the author is.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 07:46:28 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:31:03 +1000, "|-|erc"
<trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
RUBBISH
its an easy guess.
"throwing cement on a guy" by Vanilla Gorilla
It fits my claim.
Once again, only to someone who is schizophrenic. It makes no sense to
anyone who isn't mentally ill.
---
ROT-13 on Email to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alex" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
31 Dec 2003 08:03:26 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:01:38 +1000, "|-|erc"
<trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU'RE RIGHT! WOW!! IT'S NOW TIME FOR YOU TO ESCAPE THIS WORLD TO GO
WITH THE ALIENS. MAKE SURE TO PUT ON YOUR NIKES AND MATCHING JOGGING
SUIT, TAKE AT LEAST 20 PILLS AND WASH THEM DOWN WITH WILD TURKEY. THE
ALIENS ARE WAITING TO TAKE YOU TO PARADISE - GO! DO IT!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Y O U C AN G U E S S H I S N A M E THATS IT! |
30 Dec 2003 11:35:57 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:01:38 +1000, "|-|erc"
<trymyform@wwwadamskingdom.com> wrote:
YOU COULD GUESS THIS POST FROM A THOUSAND
RANDOM NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US !
From: Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) (vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net)
Subject: Re: Test |-|erc (was Re: A test proposal for Herc)
View this article only
Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell, sci.skeptic, sci.math
Date: 2003-10-06 21:13:17 PST
On 6 Oct 2003 05:57:21 -0700, (Eric
Hocking) wrote in alt.fan.art-bell:
Herc,
Just so we all know what we are attempting here, can you please
clarify your claimed "powers".
How about we just drop the whole thing down a well, and then fill the
well with concrete?
--
V.G.
---
ROT-13 on Email to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
|
