Religions > Atheism > Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
23 Sep 2004 04:32:41 AM |
| Object: |
Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth |
From most accounts, Bush appears to have received preferential
treatment to get into the Air National Guard and avoid the draft after
he graduated from Yale University in 1968. He was initially regarded
as a good pilot, but his performance faded over his final two years in
the Guard and he was suspended from flight status. He did not fly for
the remaining 18 months he served in the Guard, though he was
obligated to do so.
1. His performance didn't fade. He met his required flight time + 10% in his last 2
years.
2. He was not suspended from fight status other than he did not renew his annual flight
physical after completing every requirement for flight hours.
3. He completed all his flight requirements + 10% his last 2 years.
Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth |
23 Sep 2004 06:38:53 AM |
|
|
In article <5065l01aoss180h7q172s5lnlns60qlb93@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
From most accounts, Bush appears to have received preferential
treatment to get into the Air National Guard and avoid the draft after
he graduated from Yale University in 1968. He was initially regarded
as a good pilot, but his performance faded over his final two years in
the Guard and he was suspended from flight status. He did not fly for
the remaining 18 months he served in the Guard, though he was
obligated to do so.
1. His performance didn't fade. He met his required flight time + 10% in his last 2
years.
You're not telling the truth at all. Bush had a flying commitment until
1973. That's why his first "transfer request" was denied.
2. He was not suspended from fight status other than he did not renew his annual flight
physical
In the military you are not given the choice of which orders and rules
you would like to follow. Even bush doesn't dispute documents that say
he was *suspended* from flight status for "failed to accomplish" his
annual physical. If you are ordered to clean your rifle in the military
then it's not an adequate excuse that "I didn't think I'd need it, so I
just didn't do it...plus it looked kinda clean already...so I just told
my CO to go ***** himself". That's the type of rationale that Bush is
using.
after completing every requirement for flight hours.
Even if that were true he had over nine months of commitment still left
and he just walked away from it to work on a failed senate campaign.
What if all national guard members just left whenever they felt like it
to work on political campaigns?
3. He completed all his flight requirements + 10% his last 2 years.
That would still leave him short of his additional 9 month commitment.
Furthermore, he still can't produce any credible witnesses that saw him
or knew him at Dannelly AFB.
Get some facts for a change:
http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth |
24 Sep 2004 02:10:47 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:38:53 -0600, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
1. His performance didn't fade. He met his required flight time + 10% in his last 2
years.
You're not telling the truth at all. Bush had a flying commitment until
1973. That's why his first "transfer request" was denied.
Please tell me you understand that his six years are measured from his entrance into the
TANG, and not on January 1. He completed 56 flight hours within his 6th year. Tour
complete.
You really are a sad sack, quib.
2. He was not suspended from fight status other than he did not renew his annual flight
physical
In the military you are not given the choice of which orders and rules
you would like to follow.
He had already completed all his flight time for his 6th year. He didn't disobey an
order. Annual physicals are scheduled. He had already completed his flight requirements
to retirement. Besides, flight physicals take a few hours, so if he had to go to war, he
could be clean in half a day.
BUT, not having to fly any more, his flight currency would not allow any flights,
regardless of his Class 1 physical license.
after completing every requirement for flight hours.
Even if that were true
It WAS true.
He had over nine months of commitment still left
and he just walked away from it to work on a failed senate campaign.
Yet his flight requirements were completed.
3. He completed all his flight requirements + 10% his last 2 years.
That would still leave him short of his additional 9 month commitment.
Furthermore, he still can't produce any credible witnesses that saw him
or knew him at Dannelly AFB.
No, little mentally short-circuited buddy - years are measured from time of entrance. And
he put in his required 50 flight hours in the first two months of his 6th year. In fact,
he put in 10% extra.
Is this starting to strike home with you yet?
Get some facts for a change:
http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm
Done. I was hoping you'd do the same.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth |
23 Sep 2004 07:48:17 AM |
|
|
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1bbc639b8a4d6e4d98999a@news.individual.net:
In article <5065l01aoss180h7q172s5lnlns60qlb93@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
From most accounts, Bush appears to have received preferential
treatment to get into the Air National Guard and avoid the draft
after he graduated from Yale University in 1968. He was initially
regarded as a good pilot, but his performance faded over his final
two years in the Guard and he was suspended from flight status. He
did not fly for the remaining 18 months he served in the Guard,
though he was obligated to do so.
1. His performance didn't fade. He met his required flight time +
10% in his last 2 years.
You're not telling the truth at all. Bush had a flying commitment
until 1973. That's why his first "transfer request" was denied.
You're not telling the whole truth either. By 1972 the Air Force was
drawing down its active flying requirements. Bush's F-102 flight
qualification was in excess of requirements and training him up on a
newer model of plane wasn't worth it for somebody who would be out in a
year.
2. He was not suspended from fight status other than he did not
renew his annual flight physical
In the military you are not given the choice of which orders and rules
you would like to follow. Even bush doesn't dispute documents that
say he was *suspended* from flight status for "failed to accomplish"
his annual physical.
Except that by that time he wasn't flying anyway. We have documentation
that states that the ANG wasn't enforcing the requirement to stay
qualified for flying status by the time Bush "failed to accomplish" his
physical.
If you are ordered to clean your rifle in the
military then it's not an adequate excuse that "I didn't think I'd
need it, so I just didn't do it...plus it looked kinda clean
already...so I just told my CO to go ***** himself". That's the type
of rationale that Bush is using.
Of course you can't document that he was in fact ordered to take the
physical. The only "document" we've seen so far to that effect was a
forgery.
after completing every requirement for flight hours.
Even if that were true he had over nine months of commitment still
left and he just walked away from it to work on a failed senate
campaign. What if all national guard members just left whenever they
felt like it to work on political campaigns?
He didn't walk away. He was *excused*.
3. He completed all his flight requirements + 10% his last 2 years.
That would still leave him short of his additional 9 month commitment.
Furthermore, he still can't produce any credible witnesses that saw
him or knew him at Dannelly AFB.
Get some facts for a change:
http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm
Got the facts right here:
http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/york200408261025.asp
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the whole truth but duke and fred aren't |
23 Sep 2004 03:42:34 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns956D5990C8A6Ffstone69@207.69.189.193>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1bbc639b8a4d6e4d98999a@news.individual.net:
In article <5065l01aoss180h7q172s5lnlns60qlb93@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
From most accounts, Bush appears to have received preferential
treatment to get into the Air National Guard and avoid the draft
after he graduated from Yale University in 1968. He was initially
regarded as a good pilot, but his performance faded over his final
two years in the Guard and he was suspended from flight status. He
did not fly for the remaining 18 months he served in the Guard,
though he was obligated to do so.
1. His performance didn't fade. He met his required flight time +
10% in his last 2 years.
You're not telling the truth at all. Bush had a flying commitment
until 1973. That's why his first "transfer request" was denied.
You're not telling the whole truth either.
Yeah, I am, but you're allergic to the whole truth, so I'm not surprised
that you'd avoid it.
By 1972 the Air Force was
drawing down its active flying requirements.
Then that should have affected absolutely everyone in Bush's unit.
Bush's F-102 flight
qualification was in excess of requirements and training him up on a
newer model of plane
Then why did the rest of his unit continue to fly that model of plane.
If it was so outdated then why didn't everyone in his unit refuse to
take a physical on the grounds that they didn't want to fly an outdated
plane, so they just wouldn't fly at all. In the military you don't just
get to say, "Hey sarge, my gun is outdated, so I'm not going to fire it
any more". In time of war the CO rightly says, "I don't give a *****
what you think. Fire that gun when I order you to or I'll fire my
'outdated' gun into your *****".
wasn't worth it for somebody who would be out in a
year.
2. He was not suspended from fight status other than he did not
renew his annual flight physical
In the military you are not given the choice of which orders and rules
you would like to follow. Even bush doesn't dispute documents that
say he was *suspended* from flight status for "failed to accomplish"
his annual physical.
Except that by that time he wasn't flying anyway. We have documentation
that states that the ANG wasn't enforcing the requirement to stay
qualified for flying status by the time Bush "failed to accomplish" his
physical.
So was everyone suspended just like Bush? You aren't disputing that
Bush was suspended, are you?
If you are ordered to clean your rifle in the
military then it's not an adequate excuse that "I didn't think I'd
need it, so I just didn't do it...plus it looked kinda clean
already...so I just told my CO to go ***** himself". That's the type
of rationale that Bush is using.
Of course you can't document that he was in fact ordered to take the
physical.
We can document that there was a standing order that people knew they
were to take their physical by their birthday. Everyone understood
that, including secretaries like Marion Knox. There's simply no way
that Bush could have not been aware that he was required to do this.
Now, I will grant that not every order in the military is explicitly
spelled out in detail like instructions for a robot. They don't say,
"put your left foot forward and then your right foot forward, repeatedly
until you reach point A". They treated Bush like an adult, which was
obviously a mistake. Many officers simply would have acknowledged that
part of their basic duty as a pilot was remaining flight ready.
Furthermore, even if you want to transfer away from flying, you don't
just stop doing your job in the interim.
The only "document" we've seen so far to that effect was a
forgery.
Actually, CBS has only said that they can verify the contents, but
cannot verify whether it is a forgery or not. The testimony of Knox and
Hodges both indicate that the statements in the document are authentic,
regardless of where the documents came from.
after completing every requirement for flight hours.
Even if that were true he had over nine months of commitment still
left and he just walked away from it to work on a failed senate
campaign. What if all national guard members just left whenever they
felt like it to work on political campaigns?
He didn't walk away. He was *excused*.
Not initially. Initially he was told that he couldn't transfer off of
flight status due to the substantial investment that the military had
made in his training and his prior commitment to flying. But, they
didn't realize that Bush flip flops more in four years than Kerry does
in 20.
3. He completed all his flight requirements + 10% his last 2 years.
That would still leave him short of his additional 9 month commitment.
Furthermore, he still can't produce any credible witnesses that saw
him or knew him at Dannelly AFB.
Get some facts for a change:
http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm
Got the facts right here:
http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/york200408261025.asp
Sorry, but you need to some real facts, and you're not yet in possession
of any of those. I doubt that you'd even know what those look like.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the whole truth but duke and fred aren't |
24 Sep 2004 02:00:54 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:42:34 -0600, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote:
Then why did the rest of his unit continue to fly that model of plane.
If it was so outdated then why didn't everyone in his unit refuse to
take a physical on the grounds that they didn't want to fly an outdated
plane, so they just wouldn't fly at all.
Ok, slowly now, quib - take a deep breath. He was allowed to moved to Alabumble which did
not have but a couple of fighters that he flew, and he clearly didn't have first dibs on
them as a guest. He put in his required flight time in Texas to satisfy his flight
requirements before moving to Alabumble.
Ok, now let your breath out, and think about that.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the whole truth but duke and fred aren't |
23 Sep 2004 03:53:58 PM |
|
|
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1bbce328242cedc898999c@news.individual.net:
In article <Xns956D5990C8A6Ffstone69@207.69.189.193>,
fstone69@earthling.com says...
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1bbc639b8a4d6e4d98999a@news.individual.net:
In article <5065l01aoss180h7q172s5lnlns60qlb93@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
From most accounts, Bush appears to have received preferential
treatment to get into the Air National Guard and avoid the draft
after he graduated from Yale University in 1968. He was initially
regarded as a good pilot, but his performance faded over his
final two years in the Guard and he was suspended from flight
status. He did not fly for the remaining 18 months he served in
the Guard, though he was obligated to do so.
1. His performance didn't fade. He met his required flight time
+ 10% in his last 2 years.
You're not telling the truth at all. Bush had a flying commitment
until 1973. That's why his first "transfer request" was denied.
You're not telling the whole truth either.
Yeah, I am, but you're allergic to the whole truth, so I'm not
surprised that you'd avoid it.
I'm not avoiding anything. You are.
By 1972 the Air Force was
drawing down its active flying requirements.
Then that should have affected absolutely everyone in Bush's unit.
It affected the number that were over the requirement from that unit.
Bush, being a short-timer by then, was one of those.
Bush's F-102 flight
qualification was in excess of requirements and training him up on a
newer model of plane
Then why did the rest of his unit continue to fly that model of plane.
They didn't. They weren't all short-timers either.
If it was so outdated then why didn't everyone in his unit refuse to
take a physical on the grounds that they didn't want to fly an
outdated plane, so they just wouldn't fly at all. In the military you
don't just get to say, "Hey sarge, my gun is outdated, so I'm not
going to fire it any more". In time of war the CO rightly says, "I
don't give a ***** what you think. Fire that gun when I order you to
or I'll fire my 'outdated' gun into your *****".
Non sequitur.
wasn't worth it for somebody who would be out in a
year.
2. He was not suspended from fight status other than he did not
renew his annual flight physical
In the military you are not given the choice of which orders and
rules you would like to follow. Even bush doesn't dispute
documents that say he was *suspended* from flight status for
"failed to accomplish" his annual physical.
Except that by that time he wasn't flying anyway. We have
documentation that states that the ANG wasn't enforcing the
requirement to stay qualified for flying status by the time Bush
"failed to accomplish" his physical.
So was everyone suspended just like Bush? You aren't disputing that
Bush was suspended, are you?
Everyone wasn't on the same schedule. Unit personnel aren't all
recruited nor all discharged at the same time.
If you are ordered to clean your rifle in the
military then it's not an adequate excuse that "I didn't think I'd
need it, so I just didn't do it...plus it looked kinda clean
already...so I just told my CO to go ***** himself". That's the
type of rationale that Bush is using.
Of course you can't document that he was in fact ordered to take the
physical.
We can document that there was a standing order that people knew they
were to take their physical by their birthday. Everyone understood
that, including secretaries like Marion Knox. There's simply no way
that Bush could have not been aware that he was required to do this.
You're disregarding the fact that Bush was already off of flight status.
He was a part-timer, only required to do his two weekends per month
until his time was up. He asked to be excused that remaining time and
that was granted since he was an exemplary soldier.
Now, I will grant that not every order in the military is explicitly
spelled out in detail like instructions for a robot. They don't say,
"put your left foot forward and then your right foot forward,
repeatedly until you reach point A". They treated Bush like an
adult, which was obviously a mistake. Many officers simply would have
acknowledged that part of their basic duty as a pilot was remaining
flight ready. Furthermore, even if you want to transfer away from
flying, you don't just stop doing your job in the interim.
The only "document" we've seen so far to that effect was a
forgery.
Actually, CBS has only said that they can verify the contents, but
cannot verify whether it is a forgery or not. The testimony of Knox
and Hodges both indicate that the statements in the document are
authentic, regardless of where the documents came from.
Their testimony is worthless. Knox and Hodges statements have been
contradicted by their own superiors. The documents *are* forgeries.
after completing every requirement for flight hours.
Even if that were true he had over nine months of commitment still
left and he just walked away from it to work on a failed senate
campaign. What if all national guard members just left whenever
they felt like it to work on political campaigns?
He didn't walk away. He was *excused*.
Not initially. Initially he was told that he couldn't transfer off of
flight status due to the substantial investment that the military had
made in his training and his prior commitment to flying. But, they
didn't realize that Bush flip flops more in four years than Kerry does
in 20.
You have no evidence that he was told any such thing.
3. He completed all his flight requirements + 10% his last 2
years.
That would still leave him short of his additional 9 month
commitment.
Furthermore, he still can't produce any credible witnesses that
saw
him or knew him at Dannelly AFB.
Get some facts for a change:
http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm
Got the facts right here:
http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/york200408261025.asp
Sorry, but you need to some real facts, and you're not yet in
possession of any of those. I doubt that you'd even know what those
look like.
Sorry but you're full of *****, quibbler and you know it.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth |
23 Sep 2004 08:57:17 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:48:17 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1bbc639b8a4d6e4d98999a@news.individual.net:
In article <5065l01aoss180h7q172s5lnlns60qlb93@4ax.com>,
duckgumbo32@cox.net says...
From most accounts, Bush appears to have received preferential
treatment to get into the Air National Guard and avoid the draft
after he graduated from Yale University in 1968. He was initially
regarded as a good pilot, but his performance faded over his final
two years in the Guard and he was suspended from flight status. He
did not fly for the remaining 18 months he served in the Guard,
though he was obligated to do so.
1. His performance didn't fade. He met his required flight time +
10% in his last 2 years.
You're not telling the truth at all. Bush had a flying commitment
until 1973. That's why his first "transfer request" was denied.
You're not telling the whole truth either. By 1972 the Air Force was
drawing down its active flying requirements. Bush's F-102 flight
qualification was in excess of requirements and training him up on a
newer model of plane wasn't worth it for somebody who would be out in a
year.
And your cite for this is? Oh, that's right, you just made thsi *****
up.
2. He was not suspended from fight status other than he did not
renew his annual flight physical
In the military you are not given the choice of which orders and rules
you would like to follow. Even bush doesn't dispute documents that
say he was *suspended* from flight status for "failed to accomplish"
his annual physical.
Except that by that time he wasn't flying anyway. We have documentation
that states that the ANG wasn't enforcing the requirement to stay
qualified for flying status by the time Bush "failed to accomplish" his
physical.
*****, Killian was trying the get AWOL to show up for the physical.
If you are ordered to clean your rifle in the
military then it's not an adequate excuse that "I didn't think I'd
need it, so I just didn't do it...plus it looked kinda clean
already...so I just told my CO to go ***** himself". That's the type
of rationale that Bush is using.
Of course you can't document that he was in fact ordered to take the
physical. The only "document" we've seen so far to that effect was a
forgery.
The "forgery" is only the last two documents, the veracity of the
original Killian memo asking AWOl to show up for his physical is not
being questioned.
after completing every requirement for flight hours.
Even if that were true he had over nine months of commitment still
left and he just walked away from it to work on a failed senate
campaign. What if all national guard members just left whenever they
felt like it to work on political campaigns?
He didn't walk away. He was *excused*.
3. He completed all his flight requirements + 10% his last 2 years.
That would still leave him short of his additional 9 month commitment.
Furthermore, he still can't produce any credible witnesses that saw
him or knew him at Dannelly AFB.
Get some facts for a change:
http://www.glcq.com/bush_at_arpc1.htm
Got the facts right here:
http://www.nationalreview.com/flashback/york200408261025.asp
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1039 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth |
24 Sep 2004 02:12:30 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:57:17 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
And your cite for this is? Oh, that's right, you just made thsi *****
up.
No, you're the one that does that.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth |
24 Sep 2004 09:17:22 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:12:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:57:17 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
And your cite for this is? Oh, that's right, you just made thsi *****
up.
No, you're the one that does that.
You mean like this?
"No, we both served, but you hide."
-Earl Weber, 9/6/2004
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no. "
-Duke, explaining why it was patriotic for him to skip out on
Vietnam.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=yang++alt.atheism+duke+hell+no&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=5vki609f0ieglkd26debhtqmqjab4cqkrr%404ax.com&rnum=1
So when are you getting your medals?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1042 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Yang - telling the truth and nothing but the truth, but not the whole truth |
26 Sep 2004 09:02:23 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:17:22 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:12:30 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:57:17 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
And your cite for this is? Oh, that's right, you just made thsi *****
up.
No, you're the one that does that.
You mean like this?
"No, we both served, but you hide."
-Earl Weber, 9/6/2004
No, I duke wrote that, and it's true beyond question.
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no. "
-Duke, explaining why it was patriotic for him to skip out on
Vietnam.
Yet I served, and you run, and run, and still running. Away that is.
So when are you getting your medals?
You don't get medals for making weapons.
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Re: Michael Moore: Guns Are Okay For Me, But Not For You
OT: Not totalitarian - but guilty of creeping authoritarianism
OT: Sharon's target is not Arafat, but Palestinian solidarity
Kerry quits, but still not a "blowout".
Not Quite Barney, but Showing a Softer Side
WE ARE ALL SINNERS - MAYBE YOU ARE, BUT I'M NOT!
Not God, but man saves lives & prevents suffering yet again.
OT: The Democratic Convention: Feed, but Do Not Annoy, the Swing Voters
| Why A Federal District Court Was Wrong to Apply Strict Scrutiny to a Washington State Law Requiring Pharmacies, But Not Individual Pharmacists,
You May Not Agree With This Opinion But
god loves YOU but not them!
Raising Minimum Wage Sounds Good, But It's Not
Peace on Earth, But Not Right Now
It is not the belief or lack of belief in any gods that defines the mind manacled, defiance based spiritually sick atheist. The foundation of such non-freethinkers are characterized not by sound judgment, rationality and wisdom, but by a prejudiced i
Re: Not Serious, but Fucking Quiet
|
|
|
