| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
16 Sep 2004 07:55:25 PM |
| Object: |
Yay! |
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040916/ts_alt_afp/us_vote_poll
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we." George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
.
|
|
| User: "Atheism Crusher" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
16 Sep 2004 10:58:17 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8LednYuwB95nqNfcRVn-ig@comcast.com...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040916/ts_alt_afp/us_vote_poll
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we." George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
Go to hell you useless communist doucebag with your infested womb and
diseased soul.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
16 Sep 2004 11:19:11 PM |
|
|
One day in alt.atheism, Also Sprach Atheism Crusher:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8LednYuwB95nqNfcRVn-ig@comcast.com...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040916/ts_alt_afp
/us_vote_poll
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They
never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our
people, and neither do we." George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug.
5, 2004
Go to hell you useless communist doucebag with your infested womb and
diseased soul.
Bush is going to lose, loser. This country has been over-run by
religious zealots for long enough. The voters know it, too. We're tired
of living in your hell, fucker.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
The whole foundation of Christianity is based on the idea that
intellectualism is the work of the Devil. Remember the apple on the tree?
Okay, it was the Tree of Knowledge. "You eat this apple, you're going to
be as smart as God. We can't have that."
[Frank Zappa]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "AnotherObserver®" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
16 Sep 2004 08:31:06 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040916/ts_alt_afp/us_vote_poll
"Two opinion polls released showed Democratic challenger John Kerry
(news - web sites) back in contention with President George W. Bush
(news - web sites) in the US election race."
As many here will affirm, opinions mean nothing.
--
Davidwd
~~~~~~~~~
irreligionist
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
16 Sep 2004 11:20:05 PM |
|
|
<AnotherObserver®> wrote
As many here will affirm, opinions mean nothing.
I'm one of those that is often quick to point out that it's
still too early, but the fact remains that there just
shouldn't be a contest.
There wasn't against Reagan in 1984, and there wasn't
against Clinton in 1996.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
17 Sep 2004 09:34:46 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:20:05 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@gaydar.co.uk>
wrote:
<AnotherObserver®> wrote
As many here will affirm, opinions mean nothing.
I'm one of those that is often quick to point out that it's
still too early, but the fact remains that there just
shouldn't be a contest.
Agreed. ***** 'n Bush should have been flushed long ago.
There wasn't against Reagan in 1984, and there wasn't
against Clinton in 1996.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
17 Sep 2004 12:15:05 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:20:05 -0400, "JTEM" <jaytem@gaydar.co.uk> wrote:
<AnotherObserver®> wrote
As many here will affirm, opinions mean nothing.
I'm one of those that is often quick to point out that it's
still too early, but the fact remains that there just
shouldn't be a contest.
There wasn't against Reagan in 1984, and there wasn't
against Clinton in 1996.
Otoh, there bloody well was against Bush in '92.
What's in a name?
--
/Apostate
atheist #1931 I've found it!
BAAWA Knife AND SMASHer
EAC Supernumerary Deputy Director, Department of Redundancy Department
plonked by Lani_girl, first post; Billions Served!
I doubt, therefore I might be.
For e-mail, hold that tiger!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
17 Sep 2004 01:16:56 AM |
|
|
In article <8LednYuwB95nqNfcRVn-ig@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040916/ts_alt_afp/us_vote
_poll
So much for the big bounce. Time for the next Karl Rove smear campaign.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
-The ability to change one's mind, ideas, and opinions when confronted with
new facts is the sign of the rational and intelligent. The inability to do
so is the hallmark of the dimwitted and the fanatic. This applies not only
to science and philosophy, but also to politics.-
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Ruskai" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
18 Sep 2004 11:26:19 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:55:25 -0400, Michelle Malkin wrote:
From the article:
"Pew interviewed 1,972 registered voters, including 970 in the first
survey and 1,002 in the second one."
This is an absurdly low sample size for an electorate of 100 million
people minimum (about 105 million voted in 2000 - I'd be amazed if 2004
doesn't show a much larger number).
I don't believe this poll any more than I believed the other ones showing
Bush in the lead. I don't believe any of the polls, because:
1) They all have ridiculously low sample sizes.
2) They are all restricted to those people who are willing to answer a
pollster's questions.
--
- Mike
Remove 'spambegone.net' and reverse to send e-mail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Yay! |
19 Sep 2004 08:16:36 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 04:26:19 GMT, "Mike Ruskai"
<spamten.knilhtrae@begonedynnaht.net> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 20:55:25 -0400, Michelle Malkin wrote:
From the article:
"Pew interviewed 1,972 registered voters, including 970 in the first
survey and 1,002 in the second one."
This is an absurdly low sample size for an electorate of 100 million
people minimum (about 105 million voted in 2000 - I'd be amazed if 2004
doesn't show a much larger number).
I don't believe this poll any more than I believed the other ones showing
Bush in the lead. I don't believe any of the polls, because:
1) They all have ridiculously low sample sizes.
2) They are all restricted to those people who are willing to answer a
pollster's questions.
3) The questions and answers are slanted.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
