Religions > Atheism > Zewish university screws Jewish student---Vat?? No protest Oy Gevalt!!
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Rodger" |
| Date: |
15 Jul 2004 12:08:21 AM |
| Object: |
Zewish university screws Jewish student---Vat?? No protest Oy Gevalt!! |
To speak: perchance to be expelled—ay, there's the rub!
Greg Felton
mediamonitors.net
July 8, 2004
Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political conformity
that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and using a
megaphone—what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student has
been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he cannot
even find work as a research assistant.
Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York University
Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and implement
regulations governing the conduct of students and student activities,"
but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may have
been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and contrary
to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
Handbook.*
Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been exhausted.
Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover, Marsden
as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from campus.
That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to Section F
of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research project.
Security risk? Disruptive influence?
The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into the
political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a righteous
Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.† As
such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university president
more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan Sharansky,
as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden is
unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of security
concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and Palestinian
groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted rants
about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on university
and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which targets
professors and students who do not hew to the officially prescribed
zionist line.
Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie Farber
of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the security
of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was very
committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a way
to bring that about."§
After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted the
mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back to
the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of the
student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak Nancy
White had to say:
"Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is we
will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
functioning of the university and security of our students."**
There you have it—Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his three-year
sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant, said
virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian Jew"
(thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a perfunctory
blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
condemnation from within academia. York's political science faculty,
the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy be
reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
decision.††
Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office is
refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue should
involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority, hypocrisy,
and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of Israel.
As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially since
it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is that
Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of Governors.
No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny freedom
to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln. In
this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the university
should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
-------
* New Students Handbook
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.html>
† See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable voices
of dissent."
§ Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
•• NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13–19, 2004, cited at
<www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
†† See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to be
replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
| User: "JGB" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws Jewish student---Vat?? No protest Oy Gevalt!! |
15 Jul 2004 07:41:50 PM |
|
|
Just another Jewish traitor in a long and proud tradition of Jewish
treachery going all the way back to Korah and Dathan who opposed
Moses,
as well as those who built and worshipped the Golden Calf. When God
"chose" the "chosen people" He knew he had chosen the most treacherous
lowlifes on the
planet to be "His People," which is why He gave the JEwish people
nearly 100 times as many laws to observe under penalty than anyone
else!
He didn't bind up the JEwish people with 613 laws because He liked
them!
He yoked them to 613 laws because that was the ONLY way He could keep
them on the straight and narrow!
Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com (Rodger) wrote in message news:<7648e862.0407142108.4cf22cd9@posting.google.com>...
To speak: perchance to be expelled?ay, there's the rub!
Greg Felton
mediamonitors.net
July 8, 2004
Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political conformity
that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and using a
megaphone?what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student has
been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he cannot
even find work as a research assistant.
Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York University
Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and implement
regulations governing the conduct of students and student activities,"
but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may have
been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and contrary
to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
Handbook.*
Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been exhausted.
Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover, Marsden
as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from campus.
That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to Section F
of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research project.
Security risk? Disruptive influence?
The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into the
political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a righteous
Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.? As
such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university president
more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan Sharansky,
as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden is
unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of security
concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and Palestinian
groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted rants
about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on university
and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which targets
professors and students who do not hew to the officially prescribed
zionist line.
Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie Farber
of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the security
of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was very
committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a way
to bring that about."§
After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted the
mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back to
the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of the
student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak Nancy
White had to say:
"Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is we
will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
functioning of the university and security of our students."**
There you have it?Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his three-year
sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant, said
virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian Jew"
(thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a perfunctory
blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
condemnation from within academia. York's political science faculty,
the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy be
reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
decision.??
Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office is
refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue should
involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority, hypocrisy,
and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of Israel.
As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially since
it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is that
Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of Governors.
No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny freedom
to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln. In
this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the university
should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
-------
* New Students Handbook
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.html>
? See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable voices
of dissent."
§ Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
?? NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13?19, 2004, cited at
<www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
?? See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to be
replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rodger" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws Jewish student---Vat?? No protest Oy Gevalt!! |
16 Jul 2004 11:40:08 AM |
|
|
(JGB) wrote in message news:<2ce735b1.0407151641.67002e37@posting.google.com>...
Just another Jewish traitor in a long and proud tradition of Jewish
treachery ... <blah, blah>
SS "Garbage" Garbuz, for those how don't know, advocates gas chambers
for Palestinians, so we can't take him seriously. Similarly, this
"self-hating Jew" schtick is lame. Zewish morons like Garbage condemn
any Jew with a moral sense. He must have studied the Nazis well.
Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com (Rodger) wrote in message news:<7648e862.0407142108.4cf22cd9@posting.google.com>...
To speak: perchance to be expelled?ay, there's the rub!
Greg Felton
mediamonitors.net
July 8, 2004
Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political conformity
that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and using a
megaphone?what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student has
been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he cannot
even find work as a research assistant.
Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York University
Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and implement
regulations governing the conduct of students and student activities,"
but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may have
been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and contrary
to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
Handbook.*
Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been exhausted.
Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover, Marsden
as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from campus.
That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to Section F
of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research project.
Security risk? Disruptive influence?
The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into the
political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a righteous
Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.? As
such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university president
more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan Sharansky,
as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden is
unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of security
concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and Palestinian
groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted rants
about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on university
and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which targets
professors and students who do not hew to the officially prescribed
zionist line.
Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie Farber
of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the security
of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was very
committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a way
to bring that about."§
After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted the
mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back to
the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of the
student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak Nancy
White had to say:
"Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is we
will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
functioning of the university and security of our students."**
There you have it?Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his three-year
sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant, said
virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian Jew"
(thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a perfunctory
blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
condemnation from within academia. York's political science faculty,
the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy be
reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
decision.??
Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office is
refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue should
involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority, hypocrisy,
and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of Israel.
As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially since
it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is that
Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of Governors.
No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny freedom
to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln. In
this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the university
should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
-------
* New Students Handbook
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.html>
? See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable voices
of dissent."
§ Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
?? NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13?19, 2004, cited at
<www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
?? See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to be
replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Riain Y. Barton" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws COMMUNIST student |
15 Jul 2004 10:11:25 AM |
|
|
Originally posted by frizzer1
About a year ago my niece told me that she was being bothered by a U of T
[University of Toronto] student that she knew through friends. He was asking
her questions about Israel. My niece felt she was not able to respond so she
asked if I would speak to him. She told me that she didn't know him well,
but he seemed like a nice Jewish boy and just wanted some answers about
Israeli policy.
I declined at first but he continued to question her. So I told her that I
would accept contact with him via e-mail under certain conditions. The
condition was that Israel's legitimacy would not be on the table, (I smelled
a rat here even though my niece felt he was sincere). He agreed, so I said
ok.
His first e-mail started thusly.... "I am a Jewish student at U of T. My
grandparents were holocaust survivors. But I don't support Israel because I
am an anti-fascist. Israel is a fascist, colonialist, imperialist racist
society."
So he lied to me right off the bat.I wrote back and told him I didn't want
to be associated with him in any way and to leave my niece alone.
6 months later he wrote me back & said we had gotten off on the wrong foot
and that he wondered if I would be interested in reading an article he had
written... it started off... "Israel is a racist, ethnic cleansing,
apartheid, fascist state.
I didn't respond and haven't heard from him since... at least he never
bothered my niece again.
The name of the U of T student...
Dan Maloy... now at York University.
I knew from the start that this guy was a complete wacko... and I thought he
would just disappear under a rock somewhere... but it looks like he's going
on to bigger and worse things. He's a real fanatic and I'm certain you can
tell from the nature of his contact with me that he is a very disturbed
individual.
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407142108.4cf22cd9@posting.google.com...
| To speak: perchance to be expelled—ay, there's the rub!
|
| Greg Felton
| mediamonitors.net
| July 8, 2004
|
| Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
| University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political conformity
| that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
| Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
|
| To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
| twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and using a
| megaphone—what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
| amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
| anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
|
| For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student has
| been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
| denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
| banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he cannot
| even find work as a research assistant.
|
| Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York University
| Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and implement
| regulations governing the conduct of students and student activities,"
| but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may have
| been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and contrary
| to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
| disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
| Handbook.*
|
| Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
| appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been exhausted.
| Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover, Marsden
| as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from campus.
| That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to Section F
| of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
| Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
| Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research project.
| Security risk? Disruptive influence?
|
| The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into the
| political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a righteous
| Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.† As
| such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
| whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
| banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university president
| more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
| upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
|
| In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
| introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan Sharansky,
| as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden is
| unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
| theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
|
| Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
| management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
| zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
| Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of security
| concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and Palestinian
| groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted rants
| about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
| responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on university
| and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which targets
| professors and students who do not hew to the officially prescribed
| zionist line.
|
| Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
| academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie Farber
| of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the security
| of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was very
| committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a way
| to bring that about."§
|
| After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
| Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted the
| mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
| important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
| These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
| speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
|
| At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
| anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back to
| the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of the
| student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak Nancy
| White had to say:
|
| "Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is we
| will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
| functioning of the university and security of our students."**
|
| There you have it—Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
| Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his three-year
| sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant, said
| virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian Jew"
| (thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a perfunctory
| blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
| mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
| disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
|
| Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
| condemnation from within academia. York's political science faculty,
| the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
| Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy be
| reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
| decision.††
|
| Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office is
| refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue should
| involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority, hypocrisy,
| and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of Israel.
|
| As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially since
| it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
| U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is that
| Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
| that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of Governors.
|
| No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
| magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny freedom
| to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln. In
| this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the university
| should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
|
| -------
|
| * New Students Handbook
|
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.
html>
|
| † See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable voices
| of dissent."
|
| § Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
| Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
|
| •• NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13–19, 2004, cited at
| <www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
|
| †† See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to be
| replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rodger" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws COMMUNIST student |
15 Jul 2004 09:58:01 PM |
|
|
Gee, I bet you check under your bed every night to make sure there are
no "commies" threatening to kill you in your sleep. We should be so
lucky. perhapsa you should join Shelly on the brain implant waiting
list.
Obviously, you lack even the basic level of cognitve function to
comprehend that Dan Maloy is entirely correct.
"Riain Y. Barton" <riain802@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<x8xJc.3790$Qu5.3018@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Originally posted by frizzer1
About a year ago my niece told me that she was being bothered by a U of T
[University of Toronto] student that she knew through friends. He was asking
her questions about Israel. My niece felt she was not able to respond so she
asked if I would speak to him. She told me that she didn't know him well,
but he seemed like a nice Jewish boy and just wanted some answers about
Israeli policy.
I declined at first but he continued to question her. So I told her that I
would accept contact with him via e-mail under certain conditions. The
condition was that Israel's legitimacy would not be on the table, (I smelled
a rat here even though my niece felt he was sincere). He agreed, so I said
ok.
His first e-mail started thusly.... "I am a Jewish student at U of T. My
grandparents were holocaust survivors. But I don't support Israel because I
am an anti-fascist. Israel is a fascist, colonialist, imperialist racist
society."
So he lied to me right off the bat.I wrote back and told him I didn't want
to be associated with him in any way and to leave my niece alone.
6 months later he wrote me back & said we had gotten off on the wrong foot
and that he wondered if I would be interested in reading an article he had
written... it started off... "Israel is a racist, ethnic cleansing,
apartheid, fascist state.
I didn't respond and haven't heard from him since... at least he never
bothered my niece again.
The name of the U of T student...
Dan Maloy... now at York University.
I knew from the start that this guy was a complete wacko... and I thought he
would just disappear under a rock somewhere... but it looks like he's going
on to bigger and worse things. He's a real fanatic and I'm certain you can
tell from the nature of his contact with me that he is a very disturbed
individual.
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407142108.4cf22cd9@posting.google.com...
| To speak: perchance to be expelled?ay, there's the rub!
|
| Greg Felton
| mediamonitors.net
| July 8, 2004
|
| Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
| University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political conformity
| that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
| Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
|
| To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
| twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and using a
| megaphone?what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
| amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
| anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
|
| For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student has
| been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
| denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
| banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he cannot
| even find work as a research assistant.
|
| Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York University
| Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and implement
| regulations governing the conduct of students and student activities,"
| but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may have
| been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and contrary
| to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
| disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
| Handbook.*
|
| Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
| appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been exhausted.
| Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover, Marsden
| as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from campus.
| That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to Section F
| of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
| Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
| Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research project.
| Security risk? Disruptive influence?
|
| The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into the
| political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a righteous
| Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.? As
| such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
| whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
| banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university president
| more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
| upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
|
| In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
| introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan Sharansky,
| as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden is
| unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
| theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
|
| Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
| management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
| zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
| Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of security
| concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and Palestinian
| groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted rants
| about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
| responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on university
| and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which targets
| professors and students who do not hew to the officially prescribed
| zionist line.
|
| Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
| academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie Farber
| of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the security
| of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was very
| committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a way
| to bring that about."§
|
| After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
| Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted the
| mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
| important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
| These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
| speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
|
| At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
| anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back to
| the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of the
| student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak Nancy
| White had to say:
|
| "Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is we
| will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
| functioning of the university and security of our students."**
|
| There you have it?Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
| Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his three-year
| sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant, said
| virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian Jew"
| (thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a perfunctory
| blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
| mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
| disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
|
| Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
| condemnation from within academia. York's political science faculty,
| the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
| Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy be
| reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
| decision.??
|
| Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office is
| refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue should
| involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority, hypocrisy,
| and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of Israel.
|
| As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially since
| it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
| U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is that
| Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
| that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of Governors.
|
| No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
| magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny freedom
| to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln. In
| this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the university
| should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
|
| -------
|
| * New Students Handbook
|
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.
html>
|
| ? See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable voices
| of dissent."
|
| § Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
| Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
|
| ?? NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13?19, 2004, cited at
| <www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
|
| ?? See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to be
| replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sheldon Liberman" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws COMMUNIST student |
18 Jul 2004 07:29:10 AM |
|
|
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407151858.4b82f978@posting.google.com...
Gee, I bet you check under your bed every night to make sure there are
no "commies" threatening to kill you in your sleep. We should be so
lucky. perhapsa you should join Shelly on the brain implant waiting
list.
I've forgotten more than you'll ever know. Intellectually, I cut the
mustard, you cut the cheese. You've lost every argument we've ever had and
you just can't take it, can you? You're a loser, a fraud, a hypocrite, and
an intellectual lightweight. Have a nice day.
Obviously, you lack even the basic level of cognitve function to
comprehend that Dan Maloy is entirely correct.
"Riain Y. Barton" <riain802@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:<x8xJc.3790$Qu5.3018@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Originally posted by frizzer1
About a year ago my niece told me that she was being bothered by a U of
T
[University of Toronto] student that she knew through friends. He was
asking
her questions about Israel. My niece felt she was not able to respond so
she
asked if I would speak to him. She told me that she didn't know him
well,
but he seemed like a nice Jewish boy and just wanted some answers about
Israeli policy.
I declined at first but he continued to question her. So I told her that
I
would accept contact with him via e-mail under certain conditions. The
condition was that Israel's legitimacy would not be on the table, (I
smelled
a rat here even though my niece felt he was sincere). He agreed, so I
said
ok.
His first e-mail started thusly.... "I am a Jewish student at U of T. My
grandparents were holocaust survivors. But I don't support Israel
because I
am an anti-fascist. Israel is a fascist, colonialist, imperialist racist
society."
So he lied to me right off the bat.I wrote back and told him I didn't
want
to be associated with him in any way and to leave my niece alone.
6 months later he wrote me back & said we had gotten off on the wrong
foot
and that he wondered if I would be interested in reading an article he
had
written... it started off... "Israel is a racist, ethnic cleansing,
apartheid, fascist state.
I didn't respond and haven't heard from him since... at least he never
bothered my niece again.
The name of the U of T student...
Dan Maloy... now at York University.
I knew from the start that this guy was a complete wacko... and I
thought he
would just disappear under a rock somewhere... but it looks like he's
going
on to bigger and worse things. He's a real fanatic and I'm certain you
can
tell from the nature of his contact with me that he is a very disturbed
individual.
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407142108.4cf22cd9@posting.google.com...
| To speak: perchance to be expelled?ay, there's the rub!
|
| Greg Felton
| mediamonitors.net
| July 8, 2004
|
| Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
| University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political conformity
| that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
| Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
|
| To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
| twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and using a
| megaphone?what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
| amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
| anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
|
| For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student has
| been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
| denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
| banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he cannot
| even find work as a research assistant.
|
| Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York University
| Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and implement
| regulations governing the conduct of students and student activities,"
| but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may have
| been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and contrary
| to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
| disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
| Handbook.*
|
| Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
| appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been exhausted.
| Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover, Marsden
| as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from campus.
| That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to Section F
| of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
| Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
| Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research project.
| Security risk? Disruptive influence?
|
| The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into the
| political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a righteous
| Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.? As
| such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
| whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
| banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university president
| more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
| upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
|
| In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
| introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan Sharansky,
| as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden is
| unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
| theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
|
| Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
| management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
| zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
| Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of security
| concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and Palestinian
| groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted rants
| about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
| responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on university
| and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which targets
| professors and students who do not hew to the officially prescribed
| zionist line.
|
| Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
| academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie Farber
| of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the security
| of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was very
| committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a way
| to bring that about."§
|
| After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
| Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted the
| mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
| important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
| These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
| speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
|
| At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
| anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back to
| the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of the
| student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak Nancy
| White had to say:
|
| "Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is we
| will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
| functioning of the university and security of our students."**
|
| There you have it?Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
| Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his three-year
| sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant, said
| virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian Jew"
| (thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a perfunctory
| blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
| mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
| disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
|
| Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
| condemnation from within academia. York's political science faculty,
| the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
| Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy be
| reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
| decision.??
|
| Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office is
| refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue should
| involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority, hypocrisy,
| and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of Israel.
|
| As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially since
| it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
| U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is that
| Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
| that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of Governors.
|
| No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
| magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny freedom
| to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln. In
| this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the university
| should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
|
| -------
|
| * New Students Handbook
|
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.
html>
|
| ? See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable voices
| of dissent."
|
| § Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
| Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
|
| ?? NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13?19, 2004, cited at
| <www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
|
| ?? See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to be
| replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rodger" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws COMMUNIST student |
18 Jul 2004 06:36:05 PM |
|
|
Gee, Shelly, the meds must not be working. Yet again you engage in
your favourite conceit--yourself--yet are incapable of answering a
simple question. Empty boasts like yours serve to mask cowardice and
profound insecurity. If you were 1/10 as smarty as you think you are
you would show it by argument not by idle boasting.
You are as insignificant as a fart in a hurricane, and always will be.
"Sheldon Liberman" <webmaster@liberman.com> wrote in message news:<e%tKc.61$Gf7.18384@news20.bellglobal.com>...
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407151858.4b82f978@posting.google.com...
Gee, I bet you check under your bed every night to make sure there are
no "commies" threatening to kill you in your sleep. We should be so
lucky. perhapsa you should join Shelly on the brain implant waiting
list.
I've forgotten more than you'll ever know. Intellectually, I cut the
mustard, you cut the cheese. You've lost every argument we've ever had and
you just can't take it, can you? You're a loser, a fraud, a hypocrite, and
an intellectual lightweight. Have a nice day.
Obviously, you lack even the basic level of cognitve function to
comprehend that Dan Maloy is entirely correct.
"Riain Y. Barton" <riain802@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:<x8xJc.3790$Qu5.3018@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Originally posted by frizzer1
About a year ago my niece told me that she was being bothered by a U of
T
[University of Toronto] student that she knew through friends. He was
asking
her questions about Israel. My niece felt she was not able to respond so
she
asked if I would speak to him. She told me that she didn't know him
well,
but he seemed like a nice Jewish boy and just wanted some answers about
Israeli policy.
I declined at first but he continued to question her. So I told her that
I
would accept contact with him via e-mail under certain conditions. The
condition was that Israel's legitimacy would not be on the table, (I
smelled
a rat here even though my niece felt he was sincere). He agreed, so I
said
ok.
His first e-mail started thusly.... "I am a Jewish student at U of T. My
grandparents were holocaust survivors. But I don't support Israel
because I
am an anti-fascist. Israel is a fascist, colonialist, imperialist racist
society."
So he lied to me right off the bat.I wrote back and told him I didn't
want
to be associated with him in any way and to leave my niece alone.
6 months later he wrote me back & said we had gotten off on the wrong
foot
and that he wondered if I would be interested in reading an article he
had
written... it started off... "Israel is a racist, ethnic cleansing,
apartheid, fascist state.
I didn't respond and haven't heard from him since... at least he never
bothered my niece again.
The name of the U of T student...
Dan Maloy... now at York University.
I knew from the start that this guy was a complete wacko... and I
thought he
would just disappear under a rock somewhere... but it looks like he's
going
on to bigger and worse things. He's a real fanatic and I'm certain you
can
tell from the nature of his contact with me that he is a very disturbed
individual.
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407142108.4cf22cd9@posting.google.com...
| To speak: perchance to be expelled?ay, there's the rub!
|
| Greg Felton
| mediamonitors.net
| July 8, 2004
|
| Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
| University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political conformity
| that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
| Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
|
| To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
| twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and using a
| megaphone?what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
| amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
| anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
|
| For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student has
| been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
| denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
| banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he cannot
| even find work as a research assistant.
|
| Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York University
| Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and implement
| regulations governing the conduct of students and student activities,"
| but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may have
| been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and contrary
| to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
| disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
| Handbook.*
|
| Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
| appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been exhausted.
| Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover, Marsden
| as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from campus.
| That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to Section F
| of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
| Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
| Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research project.
| Security risk? Disruptive influence?
|
| The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into the
| political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a righteous
| Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.? As
| such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
| whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
| banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university president
| more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
| upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
|
| In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
| introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan Sharansky,
| as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden is
| unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
| theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
|
| Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
| management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
| zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
| Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of security
| concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and Palestinian
| groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted rants
| about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
| responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on university
| and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which targets
| professors and students who do not hew to the officially prescribed
| zionist line.
|
| Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
| academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie Farber
| of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the security
| of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was very
| committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a way
| to bring that about."§
|
| After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
| Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted the
| mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
| important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
| These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
| speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
|
| At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
| anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back to
| the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of the
| student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak Nancy
| White had to say:
|
| "Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is we
| will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
| functioning of the university and security of our students."**
|
| There you have it?Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
| Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his three-year
| sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant, said
| virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian Jew"
| (thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a perfunctory
| blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
| mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
| disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
|
| Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
| condemnation from within academia. York's political science faculty,
| the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
| Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy be
| reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
| decision.??
|
| Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office is
| refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue should
| involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority, hypocrisy,
| and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of Israel.
|
| As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially since
| it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
| U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is that
| Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
| that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of Governors.
|
| No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
| magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny freedom
| to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln. In
| this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the university
| should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
|
| -------
|
| * New Students Handbook
|
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.
html>
|
| ? See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable voices
| of dissent."
|
| § Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
| Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
|
| ?? NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13?19, 2004, cited at
| <www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
|
| ?? See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to be
| replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sheldon Liberman" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws COMMUNIST student |
18 Jul 2004 11:08:01 PM |
|
|
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407181536.47399aba@posting.google.com...
Gee, Shelly, the meds must not be working. Yet again you engage in
your favourite conceit--yourself--yet are incapable of answering a
simple question. Empty boasts like yours serve to mask cowardice and
profound insecurity. If you were 1/10 as smarty as you think you are
you would show it by argument not by idle boasting.
It's not a matter of conceit to elevate myself above the like of you. It's a
matter of having a firm grasp of the obvious. I've beaten you in every
argument, and you've responded by withdrawing into your bizzaro world of
snip'n'deny, then you have the audacity to make additional challenges.
You can spew your venom hither and yon; it changes nothing. You're nothing
but a childish miscreant, and your opposition to Israel is your unwitting
support of it. So stick to your murderous Arab cohorts; you deserve each
other. Meanwhile, choke on the words of Mark Twain once again:
" . the Jews constitute but one percent of the human race. It suggests a
nebulous dim puff of stardust lost in the blaze of the Milky Way.
Properly, the Jew ought hardly to be heard of, but he is heard of, has
always been heard of. He is as prominent on the planet as any other
people, and his commercial importance is extravagantly out of proportion
to the smallness of his bulk. His contributions to the world's list of
great names in literature, science, art, music, finance, medicine, and
abstruse learning are also way out of proportion to the weakness of his
numbers. He has made a marvelous fight in this world, in all the ages;
and had done it with his hands tied behind him. He could be vain of
himself, and be excused for it.
The Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Roman followed, and made a vast noise,
and they are gone. Other peoples
have sprung up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out,
and they sit in twilight now, or have vanished. The Jew saw them all,
beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no
decadence, no infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing
of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things
are mortal, but the Jew. All other forces pass, but he remains. What is
the secret of his immortality?".
You are as insignificant as a fart in a hurricane, and always will be.
You should be so insignificant, you Jew-hating loser. The shallowness of
your character precludes you from studying what I study, learning what I
learn, and knowing what I know. You and your kind are a pimple on the butt
of humanity, and far be it from to begrudging you whatever comforts your
delusions to contrary may bring you.
"Sheldon Liberman" <webmaster@liberman.com> wrote in message
news:<e%tKc.61$Gf7.18384@news20.bellglobal.com>...
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407151858.4b82f978@posting.google.com...
Gee, I bet you check under your bed every night to make sure there are
no "commies" threatening to kill you in your sleep. We should be so
lucky. perhapsa you should join Shelly on the brain implant waiting
list.
I've forgotten more than you'll ever know. Intellectually, I cut the
mustard, you cut the cheese. You've lost every argument we've ever had
and
you just can't take it, can you? You're a loser, a fraud, a hypocrite,
and
an intellectual lightweight. Have a nice day.
Obviously, you lack even the basic level of cognitve function to
comprehend that Dan Maloy is entirely correct.
"Riain Y. Barton" <riain802@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:<x8xJc.3790$Qu5.3018@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Originally posted by frizzer1
About a year ago my niece told me that she was being bothered by a U
of
T
[University of Toronto] student that she knew through friends. He
was
asking
her questions about Israel. My niece felt she was not able to
respond so
she
asked if I would speak to him. She told me that she didn't know him
well,
but he seemed like a nice Jewish boy and just wanted some answers
about
Israeli policy.
I declined at first but he continued to question her. So I told her
that
I
would accept contact with him via e-mail under certain conditions.
The
condition was that Israel's legitimacy would not be on the table, (I
smelled
a rat here even though my niece felt he was sincere). He agreed, so
I
said
ok.
His first e-mail started thusly.... "I am a Jewish student at U of
T. My
grandparents were holocaust survivors. But I don't support Israel
because I
am an anti-fascist. Israel is a fascist, colonialist, imperialist
racist
society."
So he lied to me right off the bat.I wrote back and told him I
didn't
want
to be associated with him in any way and to leave my niece alone.
6 months later he wrote me back & said we had gotten off on the
wrong
foot
and that he wondered if I would be interested in reading an article
he
had
written... it started off... "Israel is a racist, ethnic cleansing,
apartheid, fascist state.
I didn't respond and haven't heard from him since... at least he
never
bothered my niece again.
The name of the U of T student...
Dan Maloy... now at York University.
I knew from the start that this guy was a complete wacko... and I
thought he
would just disappear under a rock somewhere... but it looks like
he's
going
on to bigger and worse things. He's a real fanatic and I'm certain
you
can
tell from the nature of his contact with me that he is a very
disturbed
individual.
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407142108.4cf22cd9@posting.google.com...
| To speak: perchance to be expelled?ay, there's the rub!
|
| Greg Felton
| mediamonitors.net
| July 8, 2004
|
| Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
| University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political
conformity
| that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
| Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
|
| To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
| twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and
using a
| megaphone?what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
| amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
| anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
|
| For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student
has
| been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
| denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
| banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he
cannot
| even find work as a research assistant.
|
| Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York
University
| Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and
implement
| regulations governing the conduct of students and student
activities,"
| but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may
have
| been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and
contrary
| to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
| disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
| Handbook.*
|
| Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
| appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been
exhausted.
| Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover,
Marsden
| as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from
campus.
| That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to
Section F
| of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
| Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
| Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research
project.
| Security risk? Disruptive influence?
|
| The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into
the
| political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a
righteous
| Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.?
As
| such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
| whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
| banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university
president
| more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
| upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
|
| In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
| introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan
Sharansky,
| as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden
is
| unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
| theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
|
| Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
| management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
| zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
| Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of
security
| concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and
Palestinian
| groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted
rants
| about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
| responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on
university
| and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which
targets
| professors and students who do not hew to the officially
prescribed
| zionist line.
|
| Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
| academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie
Farber
| of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the
security
| of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was
very
| committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a
way
| to bring that about."§
|
| After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
| Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted
the
| mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
| important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
| These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
| speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
|
| At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
| anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back
to
| the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of
the
| student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak
Nancy
| White had to say:
|
| "Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is
we
| will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
| functioning of the university and security of our students."**
|
| There you have it?Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
| Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his
three-year
| sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant,
said
| virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian
Jew"
| (thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a
perfunctory
| blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
| mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
| disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
|
| Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
| condemnation from within academia. York's political science
faculty,
| the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
| Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy
be
| reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
| decision.??
|
| Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office
is
| refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue
should
| involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority,
hypocrisy,
| and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of
Israel.
|
| As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially
since
| it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
| U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is
that
| Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
| that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of
Governors.
|
| No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
| magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny
freedom
| to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln.
In
| this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the
university
| should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
|
| -------
|
| * New Students Handbook
|
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.
html>
|
| ? See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable
voices
| of dissent."
|
| § Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
| Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
|
| ?? NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13?19, 2004, cited at
| <www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
|
| ?? See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to
be
| replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rodger" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws COMMUNIST student |
19 Jul 2004 12:05:54 PM |
|
|
"Sheldon Liberman" <webmaster@liberman.com> wrote in message news:<kLHKc.6921$Gf7.217780@news20.bellglobal.com>...
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407181536.47399aba@posting.google.com...
Gee, Shelly, the meds must not be working. Yet again you engage in
your favourite conceit--yourself--yet are incapable of answering a
simple question. Empty boasts like yours serve to mask cowardice and
profound insecurity. If you were 1/10 as smarty as you think you are
you would show it by argument not by idle boasting.
You are as insignificant as a fart in a hurricane, and always will be.
It's not a matter of conceit to elevate myself above the like of you. It's a
matter of having a firm grasp of the obvious. I've beaten you in every
argument, <blah, blah, blah>
Gee, Shelly, Such an opinion you have of yourself! Such a swelled
head. you have. You are a pitiful liar. You have NEVER beaten me in
an argument. I have dared you to prove otherwise, yet you, such a
clever Jew, cannot answer a simple question.
One must conclude that you are all puffery and no brain. But, then,
that's hardly a secret.
Shelly, Shelly, the Brainless Zew,
Was given a challenge,
Knew not what to do ...etc..
"Sheldon Liberman" <webmaster@liberman.com> wrote in message
news:<e%tKc.61$Gf7.18384@news20.bellglobal.com>...
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407151858.4b82f978@posting.google.com...
Gee, I bet you check under your bed every night to make sure there are
no "commies" threatening to kill you in your sleep. We should be so
lucky. perhapsa you should join Shelly on the brain implant waiting
list.
I've forgotten more than you'll ever know. Intellectually, I cut the
mustard, you cut the cheese. You've lost every argument we've ever had
and
you just can't take it, can you? You're a loser, a fraud, a hypocrite,
and
an intellectual lightweight. Have a nice day.
Obviously, you lack even the basic level of cognitve function to
comprehend that Dan Maloy is entirely correct.
"Riain Y. Barton" <riain802@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:<x8xJc.3790$Qu5.3018@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Originally posted by frizzer1
About a year ago my niece told me that she was being bothered by a U
of
T
[University of Toronto] student that she knew through friends. He
was
asking
her questions about Israel. My niece felt she was not able to
respond so
she
asked if I would speak to him. She told me that she didn't know him
well,
but he seemed like a nice Jewish boy and just wanted some answers
about
Israeli policy.
I declined at first but he continued to question her. So I told her
that
I
would accept contact with him via e-mail under certain conditions.
The
condition was that Israel's legitimacy would not be on the table, (I
smelled
a rat here even though my niece felt he was sincere). He agreed, so
I
said
ok.
His first e-mail started thusly.... "I am a Jewish student at U of
T. My
grandparents were holocaust survivors. But I don't support Israel
because I
am an anti-fascist. Israel is a fascist, colonialist, imperialist
racist
society."
So he lied to me right off the bat.I wrote back and told him I
didn't
want
to be associated with him in any way and to leave my niece alone.
6 months later he wrote me back & said we had gotten off on the
wrong
foot
and that he wondered if I would be interested in reading an article
he
had
written... it started off... "Israel is a racist, ethnic cleansing,
apartheid, fascist state.
I didn't respond and haven't heard from him since... at least he
never
bothered my niece again.
The name of the U of T student...
Dan Maloy... now at York University.
I knew from the start that this guy was a complete wacko... and I
thought he
would just disappear under a rock somewhere... but it looks like
he's
going
on to bigger and worse things. He's a real fanatic and I'm certain
you
can
tell from the nature of his contact with me that he is a very
disturbed
individual.
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407142108.4cf22cd9@posting.google.com...
| To speak: perchance to be expelled?ay, there's the rub!
|
| Greg Felton
| mediamonitors.net
| July 8, 2004
|
| Now is the winter of discontent for one glorious student at the
| University of York. The cloud of intellectual and political
conformity
| that hangs o'er the campus has unleashed its fury upon the head of
| Daniel Freeman-Maloy. Because of what? Words. Words. Words.
|
| To hear university president Lorna Marsden tell it, Freeman-Maloy
| twice disrupted classes this year by leading two protests and
using a
| megaphone?what she generically called "an unauthorized sound
| amplification device." The second one, on March 16, marked the
| anniversary of the murder of Rachel Corrie.
|
| For his rabble-rousing, the third-year political science student
has
| been denied the right to re-register for three years, effectively
| denying him the right to finish his degree. Not only that, he is
| banned from campus under penalty of trespass, which means he
cannot
| even find work as a research assistant.
|
| Marsden cited as her authority Section 13.2 (c) of the York
University
| Act 1965, which grants the president power "to formulate and
implement
| regulations governing the conduct of students and student
activities,"
| but this is hogwash. However much of a nuisance Freeman-Maloy may
have
| been, three years' banishment is gratuitously punitive, and
contrary
| to established procedures in which students have a right to appeal
| disciplinary decisions. That right is set down in the New Students
| Handbook.*
|
| Presidential involvement in a complaint, after which there is no
| appeal, is only the last stage after all appeals have been
exhausted.
| Freeman-Maloy never had the chance to make his case. Moreover,
Marsden
| as president had no arbitrary right to ban Freeman-Maloy from
campus.
| That decision can only be made by the Provost, according to
Section F
| of the Handbook, and then only for reasons of security and order.
| Freeman-Maloy's expulsion came only after Marsden found out that
| Professor David Noble had hired him to assist with a research
project.
| Security risk? Disruptive influence?
|
| The only way to make sense of this absurd scenario is to look into
the
| political motives driving it. You see, Freeman-Maloy is a
righteous
| Jew who proudly and publicly champions Palestinian human rights.?
As
| such, he is an embarrassment to zionist lobby groups and Marsden,
| whose pro-Israel bias is shamefully conspicuous. Freeman-Maloy's
| banishment must be seen as an abuse of power by a university
president
| more interested in pandering to Toronto's Jewish community than in
| upholding academic freedom and intellectual honesty.
|
| In September 2003, Freeman-Maloy condemned as "racist" Marsden's
| introduction of the odious Israeli diaspora Minister Natan
Sharansky,
| as "a symbol of the struggle for human rights." Obviously, Marsden
is
| unaware that Sharansky is primarily responsible for promoting the
| theft of Arab land for Jewish "settlers."
|
| Marsden's zionist credentials really shone when she overruled the
| management of York's Student Centre and allowed U.S. anti-Muslim
| zealot Daniel Pipes to deliver a lecture "Barriers to Peace in the
| Middle East." The centre refused to hold the event because of
security
| concerns, which, given the animosity between zionist and
Palestinian
| groups, was understandable. Pipes is notorious for his bigoted
rants
| about Arabs and his apologetics for Israeli terror. He is also
| responsible for engendering neo-McCarthyite intimidation on
university
| and college campuses through his website campus-watch, which
targets
| professors and students who do not hew to the officially
prescribed
| zionist line.
|
| Marsden overruled the centre, not out of a highly place sense of
| academic duty or principle, but after she was prodded by Bernie
Farber
| of the Canadian Jewish Congress. "She was concerned for the
security
| of the students and the university itself, but, I believe, was
very
| committed to ensuring that the talk went on and was looking for a
way
| to bring that about."§
|
| After Marsden approved Pipes's lecture, over the objections of the
| Middle Eastern Student Association, zionist organizations chanted
the
| mantra of how this was a victory for free speech, and how it's
| important for all sides of an argument to be heard, yadda, yadda.
| These same groups, of course, opposed the entry of a Saudi Arabian
| speaker on the grounds he was "anti-Semitic."
|
| At York, free speech for zionist speakers and free-speech for
| anti-zionist speakers is not the same thing, which brings me back
to
| the subject of student security. Marsden overruled the concerns of
the
| student centre on this issue, but here's what chief media flak
Nancy
| White had to say:
|
| "Was three years too much? We made a judgment call. Our message is
we
| will continue to take actions of this kind to ensure the academic
| functioning of the university and security of our students."**
|
| There you have it?Freeman-Maloy is a greater security threat than
| Pipes! How did the Jewish community at-large react to his
three-year
| sentence? B'nai Brith Canada, which is always good for a rant,
said
| virtually nothing. It labeled Freeman-Maloy as a "pro-Palestinian
Jew"
| (thereby denying him legitimacy in zionist eyes) and ran a
perfunctory
| blurb that contained not a single word of condemnation. It didn't
| mention that Marsden's conduct violated York's established
| disciplinary procedures and denied him the right to appeal.
|
| Freeman-Maloy's banishment has also earned Marsden universal
| condemnation from within academia. York's political science
faculty,
| the York University Faculty Association, and the National Canadian
| Association of University Teachers have all demanded Freeman-Maloy
be
| reinstated. The York Senate has even asked Marsden to rescind her
| decision.??
|
| Despite the condemnation, Marsden is stonewalling and her office
is
| refusing to return media calls. It's fitting that this issue
should
| involve the Middle East, though. Gross abuse of authority,
hypocrisy,
| and disregard for legitimate criticism are all hallmarks of
Israel.
|
| As we know, Israel ought to be expelled from the UN, especially
since
| it has repeatedly violated its terms of admission, but the servile
| U.S. won't let that happen. The good news for students at York is
that
| Marsden can be removed under Section 13.1 of the Act, which states
| that the president serves at the pleasure of the Board of
Governors.
|
| No matter how irritating or vocal Freeman-Maloy may have been, the
| magnitude of his banishment is indefensible. "Those who deny
freedom
| to others, deserve it not for themselves," said Abraham Lincoln.
In
| this spirit, Freeman-Maloy must be readmitted, or else the
university
| should replace the "o" of York with the Star of David.
|
| -------
|
| * New Students Handbook
|
<www.arts.yorku.ca/advising/handbook_archive/handbook2001/conductofstudents.
html>
|
| ? See my May 27 article "Righteous Jews--Israel's uncomfortable
voices
| of dissent."
|
| § Frances Kraft, "Pipes to speak at York despite earlier veto,"
| Canadian Jewish Times, Jan. 30, 2003.
|
| ?? NOW Magazine online, VOL. 23 NO. 37, May 13?19, 2004, cited at
| <www.rabble.ca/babble/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001203>
|
| ?? See Professor David F. Noble, "Prof calls for York president to
be
| replaced," <www.uwatch.ca/?postid=32>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sheldon Liberman" |
|
| Title: Re: Zewish university screws COMMUNIST student |
19 Jul 2004 05:26:32 PM |
|
|
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407190905.59c92268@posting.google.com...
"Sheldon Liberman" <webmaster@liberman.com> wrote in message
news:<kLHKc.6921$Gf7.217780@news20.bellglobal.com>...
"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7648e862.0407181536.47399aba@posting.google.com...
Gee, Shelly, the meds must not be working. Yet again you engage in
your favourite conceit--yourself--yet are incapable of answering a
simple question. Empty boasts like yours serve to mask cowardice and
profound insecurity. If you were 1/10 as smarty as you think you are
you would show it by argument not by idle boasting.
You are as insignificant as a fart in a hurricane, and always will be.
It's not a matter of conceit to elevate myself above the like of you.
It's a
matter of having a firm grasp of the obvious. I've beaten you in every
argument, <blah, blah, blah>
Gee, Shelly, Such an opinion you have of yourself! Such a swelled
head. you have. You are a pitiful liar. You have NEVER beaten me in
an argument. I have dared you to prove otherwise, yet you, such a
clever Jew, cannot answer a simple question.
One must conclude that you are all puffery and no brain. But, then,
that's hardly a secret.
Shelly, Shelly, the Brainless Zew,
Was given a challenge,
Knew not what to do ...etc..
Keep whistling in the rain, Felton. Perhaps one day you'll develop enough
sense to come in out of it. No one who knows you will be holding his breath.
"Sheldon Liberman" <webmaster@liberman.com> wrote in message
news:<e%tKc.61$Gf7.18384@news20.bellglobal.com>...
| | | | | | | |
