On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:55:35 -0800, after pondering
deep thoughts, jw <j w<no>@yahoo.com> spake thusly:
Sorry for the post into non-Christian groups, but since
this person is under discussion, I thought this
information would be quite revealing.
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:43:05 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:52:14 -0700, after pondering
deep thoughts,
spake thusly:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:01:37 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> jotted down:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:16:47 -0700, after pondering
deep thoughts,
spake thusly:
The trouble is that there are those who believe the pseudo-scholarship
of the kjv-onliers that is wholly illogical and mostly void of truth.
And both you and John, when you cannot refute the
points made, lie and say that someone is KJV Only, so
you can trot out your standard attack on them, which
has nothing to do with scholarship, but on attacking
their position on the KJV itself, regardless of
underlying texts.
There you go, LYING ABOUT WHAT I SAID AGAIN. I said that though you
CLAIM NOT TO BE a kjv-onlier, you still fall into the above camp of
BELIEVING their pseudo-scholarship.
You said that LATER, after I AGAIN corrected you, as I
have more than once in the past.
And with your arrogant hyper-inflated sense of self-importance, it
never occurs to you that no matter how many times you "correct"
someone, that doesn't make you right.
It does when I provide proof...
Pastor Dave: "There are other options though. I would
research different modern English translations and see
what they're based on, if a modern English version is
what I wanted.
I am not a "KJV only" person. I just haven't found
many modern English versions that I would consider
trustworthy and when dealing with God's word, I think
we had all better be very careful about which version
we choose to read. After all, this is God's written
word to mankind we are dealing with. It is of the
utmost importance!
As I said, there are modern English versions based on
the Majority Texts. I simply have not read those
versions cover to cover and can't speak for every
verse, but they appear to be very well done."
http://tinyurl.com/4f77z
....and you apologize for calling me a "KJV Only" person
and then later call me one again...
Pastor Dave: You keep dishonestly trying to spin this
into a "KJV Only" issue and it isn't. Thus, you prove
you are dishonest and frankly, I'm done with you.
John (jw): #1 I apologize. Sometimes it takes me awhile
for information to penetrate. Now that I have seen you
explain your position to several others, I understand
that you are not a declared KJV Only person.
http://tinyurl.com/3wv7a
Thus, you admitted that you did do it. You also
apologized for it.
You think you can get away with your lying about
people, because you think that your "no-archive"
setting protects you. It doesn't.
Now here you are again, claiming that I am wrong and
defending the claim that I am a KJV Only person.
You are a liar and a bad one at that.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditations." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
.
