I am not a "KJV only" person. I just haven't found
many modern English versions that I would consider
trustworthy and when dealing with God's word, I think
we had all better be very careful about which version
we choose to read. After all, this is God's written
word to mankind we are dealing with. It is of the
utmost importance!

As I said, there are modern English versions based on
the Majority Texts. I simply have not read those
versions cover to cover and can't speak for every
verse, but they appear to be very well done."

http://tinyurl.com/4f77z


...and you apologize for calling me a "KJV Only" person
and then later call me one again...

Perhaps that is just your "spin."

You think you can get away with your lying about
people, because you think that your "no-archive"
setting protects you. It doesn't.

That is not why I don't archive. And when you
say it is, YOU lie.

You cut me NO slack for my admitted mental illness

On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 01:52:15 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> sez the following
funny stuff:

You don't deserve any. You think admitting you have a
mental illness gives you the right to lie about people
and libel them all you want, with a free pass.

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:43:05 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved
(keep it in the group)

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:52:14 -0700, after pondering
deep thoughts,

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:01:37 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> jotted down:

On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:16:47 -0700, after pondering
deep thoughts,

The trouble is that there are those who believe the
pseudo-scholarship of the kjv-onliers that is wholly
illogical and mostly void of truth.

And both you and John, when you cannot refute the
points made, lie and say that someone is KJV Only, so
you can trot out your standard attack on them, which
has nothing to do with scholarship, but on attacking
their position on the KJV itself, regardless of
underlying texts.

There you go, LYING ABOUT WHAT I SAID AGAIN.
I said that though you CLAIM NOT TO BE a kjv-onlier,
you still fall into the above camp of BELIEVING their
pseudo-scholarship.

You said that LATER, after I AGAIN corrected you, as I
have more than once in the past.

And with your arrogant hyper-inflated sense of
self-importance, it never occurs to you that no
matter how many times you "correct" someone,
that doesn't make you right.