Evolutionists often claim that if the evolutionary process were hung up on a
small local adaptive maximum, a large genetic change like a recombination,
or other genetic rearrangement, could bring it to another hill that has a
higher peak, and place it higher up on that hill than it was before. Large
adaptive changes are, however, highly improbable. They are orders of
magnitude less probable than getting an adaptive change with a single
nucleotide substitution, which is itself improbable. No one has shown this
to be possible either.

http://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.asp

~There are no Christian newsgroups.~

Evolutionists often claim that if the evolutionary process were hung
up on a small local adaptive maximum, a large genetic change like a
recombination, or other genetic rearrangement, could bring it to
another hill that has a higher peak, and place it higher up on that
hill than it was before. Large adaptive changes are, however, highly
improbable. They are orders of magnitude less probable than getting
an adaptive change with a single nucleotide substitution, which is
itself improbable. No one has shown this to be possible either.

Evolutionists often claim that if the evolutionary process were hung up on
a small local adaptive maximum, a large genetic change like a
recombination, or other genetic rearrangement, could bring it to another
hill that has a higher peak, and place it higher up on that hill than it
was before. Large adaptive changes are, however, highly improbable. They
are orders of magnitude less probable than getting an adaptive change with
a single nucleotide substitution, which is itself improbable. No one has
shown this to be possible either.

http://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.asp

--
~There are no true atheists in Christian newsgroups.~

"John" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:D7ydnVlUDfEbtDHeRVn-iQ@comcast.com...

Just keep repeating the same mistaken "separation
of church and state" mantra. Even though it's not
in the Constitution, just keep repeating it.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Maybe if you've been a good boy Santa will bring you a clue.
Idiot.

Tim K. wrote:

"John" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:D7ydnVlUDfEbtDHeRVn-iQ@comcast.com...

Well, you are right about one thing, the Evolutionists
are quite content with their theories. Oh, just don't
present any contrary evidence. For example, don't
discuss topics like abiogenesis with the Evolutionist.
Evolutionists will just ignore the issue and claim that
these topics are separate fields. As such, Evolution
is not a real science because it is treated like a
sacred cow. Evolutionists are not willing to alter
their theories when presented with contrary evidence.
Instead, they will attack those that point out the
faults with their precious theories.

What ever happened to real science?

Just keep repeating the same mistaken "separation
of church and state" mantra. Even though it's not
in the Constitution, just keep repeating it.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or
the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the government for a redress of grievances.

So what part of "Congress shall make no law ... prohibiting
the free exercise [of religion]" don't you understand? As
soon as the concept of religion enters a scientific study,
the ACLU comes crying unfair. So what, is the ACLU, and now
Judge Jones, going to prohibit all expressions that contain
a religious inference? No one is establishing a religion,
any particular religion over another, or even forcing anyone
to believe in a religion. However, the ACLU and Judge Jones
are forcing Anti-Religion upon the believers. This latest
ruling is, IMHO, opposed to Pennsylvania State Laws protecting
Religious Freedom. The ACLU and Judge Jones are pushing their
anti-religious theories on religious students.

Maybe if you've been a good boy Santa will bring you a clue.

My, and here I didn't think grown ups believed in Santa.
Of course, there was a very real St. Nicholas.
See: http://www.stnicholascenter.org

Idiot.

Is "Idiot" your first name, last name, or just what
people call you?

http://www.trueorigin.org/spetner1.asp