ACLJ & Marriage



 Religions > Bible > ACLJ & Marriage

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "Ananias917"
Date: 19 Dec 2005 04:03:30 PM
Object: ACLJ & Marriage
http://www.aclj.org/Issues/InDepth.aspx?ID=59
--
"And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house;
and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the
Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way
as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest
receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost."
- Acts 9:17
Christian Legal Service:fighting for Christian issues:
http://www.aclj.org/Issues/Default.aspx
Home page: http://www.aclj.org
Also see: trueorigin.org & godandscience.org
.

User: "• Ninure Saunders"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 20 Dec 2005 08:17:17 AM
Biblical marriage: a bad source for debate
By Vaughn Roste
We've heard a lot about "biblical marriage" lately, largely as a
defensive reaction against same-sex marriage. I read one letter to the
editor written by a Lutheran pastor that claimed "the Bible
clearly teaches that marriage is the God-ordained covenantal union of one
man to one woman." How very applicable to the contemporary situation, I
thought. If the Bible really teaches that (and in such modern language
too!), then we all should be paying the Bible a lot more heed.
So I picked up my Bible and looked up all the passages that have
anything to do with marriage (I had help: I used a concordance). I
examined the scriptural use of all the words I could think of
related to marriage: marriage, marriages, marry, marries, married,
wedding, weddings, wed, husband, husbands, wife, and wives.
All told, I looked up over 800 references. Exempting the references that
are narrative (e.g. "Adam named his wife Eve" Gen 3:20) or
metaphorical (Christ's marriage to the church, Rev 21:9), I was able to
distil those 825 verse references into 12 general principles: 12 Biblical
"rules" or guidelines
regarding marriage that encompass the gamut of scripture. I hereby present
the list, with the applicable references.
12 Biblical Principles of Marriage
Marriage consists of one man and one or more women (Gen 4:19, 4:23, 26:34,
28:9, 29:26-30, 30:26, 31:17, 32:22, 36:2, 36:10, 37:2, Ex. 21:10, Judges
8:30, 1 Sam 1:2, 25:43, 27:3, 30:5, 30:18, 2 Sam 2:2, 3:2-5, 1 Chron
3:1-3, 4:5, 8:8, 14:3, 2 Chron 11:21, 13:21, 24:3).
Nothing prevents a man from taking on concubines in addition to the wife
or wives he may already have (Gen 25:6, Judges 8:31, 2 Sam
5:13, 1 Kings 11:3, 1 Chron 3:9, 2 Chron 11:21, Dan 5:2-3).
A man might choose any woman he wants for his wife (Gen 6:2, Deut
21:11), provided only that she is not already another man's wife
(Lev 18:14-16, Deut. 22:30) or his [half-] sister (Lev 18:11,
20:17), nor the mother (Lev 20:14) or the sister (Lev 18:18) of a
woman who is already his wife. The concept of a woman giving her
consent to being married is foreign to the Biblical mindset.
If a woman cannot be proven to be a virgin at the time of marriage, she
shall be stoned (Deut 22:13-21).
A rapist must marry his victim (Ex. 22:16, Deut. 22:28-29) - unless she
was already a fiancee, in which case he should be put to death if he raped
her in the country, but both of them killed if he raped her in town (Deut.
22:23-27).
If a man dies childless, his brother must marry the widow (Gen 38:6- 10,
Deut 25:5-10, Mark12: 19, Luke 20:28).
Women marry the man of their father's choosing (Gen. 24:4, Josh.
15:16-17, Judges 1:12-13, 12:9, 21:1, 1 Sam 17:25, 18:19, 1 Kings
2:21, 1 Chron 2:35, Jer 29:6, Dan 11:17).
Women are the property of their father until married and their
husband after that (Ex. 20:17, 22:17, Deut. 22:24, Mat 22:25).
The value of a woman might be approximately seven years' work (Gen 29:14-30).
Inter-faith marriages are prohibited (Gen 24:3, 28:1, 28:6, Num 25:1- 9,
Ezra 9:12, Neh 10:30, 2 Cor 6:14). Divorce is forbidden (Deut
22:19, Matt 5:32, 19:9, Mark10:9-12, Luke 16:18, Rom 7:2, 1 Cor 7:10- 11, 7:39).
Better to not get married at all - although marriage is not a sin
(Matt 19:10, I Cor 7:1, 7:27-28, 7:32-34, 7:38).
How many of these Biblical principles are followed by Christians
today? Not a single one [with the possible exception of number 3 - some
Christian women may still have no choice in their marital
partner!] Nowhere in the Bible does it say, "Marriage is the God-
ordained covenantal union of one man and one woman;" in fact, it
says explicitly to the contrary! The Bible lists at least 15
polygamists (not including Herod, who is known from the historical - but
not Biblical - record to have had 9 wives), and in not a single place does
polygamy carry with it any sense of opprobrium.
Unfortunately, the pastor mentioned above would have been far more correct
to say that "the Bible teaches that marriage is a covenantal union of one
man to as many women as he might want and can afford."
So the next time your favorite politician or preacher claims to use the
Bible in support of traditional marriage, ask him or her which of these 12
principles he or she is actually advocating. Probably none. Anyone who
claims to use the Bible in support of a strictly monogamous union of one
male and one female based on love,
mutuality, and commitment will be hard pressed to find 2,000 year- old
Bible verses in support of that very modern position. In fact, I daresay
they cannot. The Biblical view of marriage is not
monogamous: it is not necessarily based on love, or on any amount of mutuality.
Most Christians would consider these Biblical principles of marriage to be
misogynistic and repulsive - and judging by today's
standards, they'd be right. Views have changed since Biblical times, as
has our concept of marriage. Some would claim that this is the result of
the Holy Spirit working in our world; most agree that just about all of
the changes are a good thing. But if we concede that our concept of
marriage has evolved, is it not potentially arrogant to summarily discount
the possibility that marriage should continue evolving, or even that it
might be God's will that it do so?
From the looks of the above list, it's a good thing our perspectives have
changed from the Biblical model. Thus as we continue to dialog and
prayerfully discern God's will in the area of same-sex
marriages, we obviously cannot consider 2,000-year-old statements
made in other cultures and contexts to be all that is important.
Please do not misinterpret that I am claiming that the Bible is not
important - of course it is. It is central to my faith, as it should be
for any Christian. But to rely on solely the Bible is to
dangerously ignore two millennia of progress in the areas of
science, technology, and human rights, a sin which we dare not let
ourselves commit if the church is to remain relevant to contemporary
society at all.
To rely solely on Scripture for church policy is to ignore the
possibility that the Holy Spirit has been active at all in the
sixteen centuries since the canon was closed in 405 CE. Indeed, we need to
consider that the Holy Spirit may be actively encouraging us today to move
beyond a literal reading of the Bible and to refuse to become modern
Pharisees.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The
son of two Lutheran pastors, Vaughn Roste has since worshipped and worked
in Episcopalian and Presbyterian Churches, but his
current employment is in a United Church. Holding degrees in
theology and music from two different church institutions, he
currently freelances as a writer and musician in Edmonton.
--
Pax Christi,
• Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.
User: "Ananias917"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 20 Dec 2005 02:15:48 PM
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:17:17 GMT,
Ninurenohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk (• Ninure Saunders)
spake thusly:

Biblical marriage: a bad source for debate
By Vaughn Roste

We've heard a lot about "biblical marriage" lately,

And you hate the fact that nowhere does God ordain
homosexual marriage.
--
"And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house;
and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the
Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way
as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest
receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost."
- Acts 9:17
Would a loving God send people to Hell?
http://godandscience.org/apologetics/hell.html
.
User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 12 May 2006 12:05:51 PM
"Ananias917" <_-_Ananias917_-_@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:lipgq1l1ubc3slfve07k6b6o01djnfvigu@4ax.com...

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:17:17 GMT,
Ninurenohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk (. Ninure Saunders)
spake thusly:

Biblical marriage: a bad source for debate
By Vaughn Roste

We've heard a lot about "biblical marriage" lately,


And you hate the fact that nowhere does God ordain
homosexual marriage.

Better yet, don't you hate the idea that Jesus never even brought up the
topic of homosexuality ?

--

"And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house;
and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the
Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way
as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest
receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost."
- Acts 9:17

Would a loving God send people to Hell?

http://godandscience.org/apologetics/hell.html

.


User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 09 May 2006 08:27:30 PM
Well done :-)
". Ninure Saunders" <Ninurenohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote in message
news:Ninurenohate-2012050834500001@h-64-105-81-52.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net...

Biblical marriage: a bad source for debate
By Vaughn Roste

We've heard a lot about "biblical marriage" lately, largely as a
defensive reaction against same-sex marriage. I read one letter to the
editor written by a Lutheran pastor that claimed "the Bible
clearly teaches that marriage is the God-ordained covenantal union of one
man to one woman." How very applicable to the contemporary situation, I
thought. If the Bible really teaches that (and in such modern language
too!), then we all should be paying the Bible a lot more heed.

So I picked up my Bible and looked up all the passages that have
anything to do with marriage (I had help: I used a concordance). I
examined the scriptural use of all the words I could think of
related to marriage: marriage, marriages, marry, marries, married,
wedding, weddings, wed, husband, husbands, wife, and wives.

All told, I looked up over 800 references. Exempting the references that
are narrative (e.g. "Adam named his wife Eve" Gen 3:20) or
metaphorical (Christ's marriage to the church, Rev 21:9), I was able to
distil those 825 verse references into 12 general principles: 12 Biblical
"rules" or guidelines
regarding marriage that encompass the gamut of scripture. I hereby present
the list, with the applicable references.

12 Biblical Principles of Marriage

Marriage consists of one man and one or more women (Gen 4:19, 4:23, 26:34,
28:9, 29:26-30, 30:26, 31:17, 32:22, 36:2, 36:10, 37:2, Ex. 21:10, Judges
8:30, 1 Sam 1:2, 25:43, 27:3, 30:5, 30:18, 2 Sam 2:2, 3:2-5, 1 Chron
3:1-3, 4:5, 8:8, 14:3, 2 Chron 11:21, 13:21, 24:3).

Nothing prevents a man from taking on concubines in addition to the wife
or wives he may already have (Gen 25:6, Judges 8:31, 2 Sam
5:13, 1 Kings 11:3, 1 Chron 3:9, 2 Chron 11:21, Dan 5:2-3).

A man might choose any woman he wants for his wife (Gen 6:2, Deut
21:11), provided only that she is not already another man's wife
(Lev 18:14-16, Deut. 22:30) or his [half-] sister (Lev 18:11,
20:17), nor the mother (Lev 20:14) or the sister (Lev 18:18) of a
woman who is already his wife. The concept of a woman giving her
consent to being married is foreign to the Biblical mindset.

If a woman cannot be proven to be a virgin at the time of marriage, she
shall be stoned (Deut 22:13-21).

A rapist must marry his victim (Ex. 22:16, Deut. 22:28-29) - unless she
was already a fiancee, in which case he should be put to death if he raped
her in the country, but both of them killed if he raped her in town (Deut.
22:23-27).

If a man dies childless, his brother must marry the widow (Gen 38:6- 10,
Deut 25:5-10, Mark12: 19, Luke 20:28).

Women marry the man of their father's choosing (Gen. 24:4, Josh.
15:16-17, Judges 1:12-13, 12:9, 21:1, 1 Sam 17:25, 18:19, 1 Kings
2:21, 1 Chron 2:35, Jer 29:6, Dan 11:17).

Women are the property of their father until married and their
husband after that (Ex. 20:17, 22:17, Deut. 22:24, Mat 22:25).

The value of a woman might be approximately seven years' work (Gen
29:14-30).

Inter-faith marriages are prohibited (Gen 24:3, 28:1, 28:6, Num 25:1- 9,
Ezra 9:12, Neh 10:30, 2 Cor 6:14). Divorce is forbidden (Deut
22:19, Matt 5:32, 19:9, Mark10:9-12, Luke 16:18, Rom 7:2, 1 Cor 7:10- 11,
7:39).

Better to not get married at all - although marriage is not a sin
(Matt 19:10, I Cor 7:1, 7:27-28, 7:32-34, 7:38).

How many of these Biblical principles are followed by Christians
today? Not a single one [with the possible exception of number 3 - some
Christian women may still have no choice in their marital
partner!] Nowhere in the Bible does it say, "Marriage is the God-
ordained covenantal union of one man and one woman;" in fact, it
says explicitly to the contrary! The Bible lists at least 15
polygamists (not including Herod, who is known from the historical - but
not Biblical - record to have had 9 wives), and in not a single place does
polygamy carry with it any sense of opprobrium.
Unfortunately, the pastor mentioned above would have been far more correct
to say that "the Bible teaches that marriage is a covenantal union of one
man to as many women as he might want and can afford."

So the next time your favorite politician or preacher claims to use the
Bible in support of traditional marriage, ask him or her which of these 12
principles he or she is actually advocating. Probably none. Anyone who
claims to use the Bible in support of a strictly monogamous union of one
male and one female based on love,
mutuality, and commitment will be hard pressed to find 2,000 year- old
Bible verses in support of that very modern position. In fact, I daresay
they cannot. The Biblical view of marriage is not
monogamous: it is not necessarily based on love, or on any amount of
mutuality.

Most Christians would consider these Biblical principles of marriage to be
misogynistic and repulsive - and judging by today's
standards, they'd be right. Views have changed since Biblical times, as
has our concept of marriage. Some would claim that this is the result of
the Holy Spirit working in our world; most agree that just about all of
the changes are a good thing. But if we concede that our concept of
marriage has evolved, is it not potentially arrogant to summarily discount
the possibility that marriage should continue evolving, or even that it
might be God's will that it do so?

From the looks of the above list, it's a good thing our perspectives have
changed from the Biblical model. Thus as we continue to dialog and
prayerfully discern God's will in the area of same-sex
marriages, we obviously cannot consider 2,000-year-old statements
made in other cultures and contexts to be all that is important.
Please do not misinterpret that I am claiming that the Bible is not
important - of course it is. It is central to my faith, as it should be
for any Christian. But to rely on solely the Bible is to
dangerously ignore two millennia of progress in the areas of
science, technology, and human rights, a sin which we dare not let
ourselves commit if the church is to remain relevant to contemporary
society at all.

To rely solely on Scripture for church policy is to ignore the
possibility that the Holy Spirit has been active at all in the
sixteen centuries since the canon was closed in 405 CE. Indeed, we need to
consider that the Holy Spirit may be actively encouraging us today to move
beyond a literal reading of the Bible and to refuse to become modern
Pharisees.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The
son of two Lutheran pastors, Vaughn Roste has since worshipped and worked
in Episcopalian and Presbyterian Churches, but his
current employment is in a United Church. Holding degrees in
theology and music from two different church institutions, he
currently freelances as a writer and musician in Edmonton.
--
Pax Christi,
. Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian

Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk

My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk

Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org

The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org

To send e-mail, remove nohate from address

.
User: "Paul"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 09 May 2006 09:32:02 PM
You should read more throughly Sodom n Gomorrah Why these cities were
Judged. Which Sin was it? Let me see, the men wanted the Angels instead of
the virgin daughters of Lot MMMMMMMMMMM, which sin , your probaly clueless.
Glenn (Christian Mystic) <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1262fpla9put046@corp.supernews.com...

Well done :-)

". Ninure Saunders" <Ninurenohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote in message

news:Ninurenohate-2012050834500001@h-64-105-81-52.chcgilgm.dynamic.covad.net
....

Biblical marriage: a bad source for debate
By Vaughn Roste

We've heard a lot about "biblical marriage" lately, largely as a
defensive reaction against same-sex marriage. I read one letter to the
editor written by a Lutheran pastor that claimed "the Bible
clearly teaches that marriage is the God-ordained covenantal union of

one

man to one woman." How very applicable to the contemporary situation, I
thought. If the Bible really teaches that (and in such modern language
too!), then we all should be paying the Bible a lot more heed.

So I picked up my Bible and looked up all the passages that have
anything to do with marriage (I had help: I used a concordance). I
examined the scriptural use of all the words I could think of
related to marriage: marriage, marriages, marry, marries, married,
wedding, weddings, wed, husband, husbands, wife, and wives.

All told, I looked up over 800 references. Exempting the references that
are narrative (e.g. "Adam named his wife Eve" Gen 3:20) or
metaphorical (Christ's marriage to the church, Rev 21:9), I was able to
distil those 825 verse references into 12 general principles: 12

Biblical

"rules" or guidelines
regarding marriage that encompass the gamut of scripture. I hereby

present

the list, with the applicable references.

12 Biblical Principles of Marriage

Marriage consists of one man and one or more women (Gen 4:19, 4:23,

26:34,

28:9, 29:26-30, 30:26, 31:17, 32:22, 36:2, 36:10, 37:2, Ex. 21:10,

Judges

8:30, 1 Sam 1:2, 25:43, 27:3, 30:5, 30:18, 2 Sam 2:2, 3:2-5, 1 Chron
3:1-3, 4:5, 8:8, 14:3, 2 Chron 11:21, 13:21, 24:3).

Nothing prevents a man from taking on concubines in addition to the wife
or wives he may already have (Gen 25:6, Judges 8:31, 2 Sam
5:13, 1 Kings 11:3, 1 Chron 3:9, 2 Chron 11:21, Dan 5:2-3).

A man might choose any woman he wants for his wife (Gen 6:2, Deut
21:11), provided only that she is not already another man's wife
(Lev 18:14-16, Deut. 22:30) or his [half-] sister (Lev 18:11,
20:17), nor the mother (Lev 20:14) or the sister (Lev 18:18) of a
woman who is already his wife. The concept of a woman giving her
consent to being married is foreign to the Biblical mindset.

If a woman cannot be proven to be a virgin at the time of marriage, she
shall be stoned (Deut 22:13-21).

A rapist must marry his victim (Ex. 22:16, Deut. 22:28-29) - unless she
was already a fiancee, in which case he should be put to death if he

raped

her in the country, but both of them killed if he raped her in town

(Deut.

22:23-27).

If a man dies childless, his brother must marry the widow (Gen 38:6- 10,
Deut 25:5-10, Mark12: 19, Luke 20:28).

Women marry the man of their father's choosing (Gen. 24:4, Josh.
15:16-17, Judges 1:12-13, 12:9, 21:1, 1 Sam 17:25, 18:19, 1 Kings
2:21, 1 Chron 2:35, Jer 29:6, Dan 11:17).

Women are the property of their father until married and their
husband after that (Ex. 20:17, 22:17, Deut. 22:24, Mat 22:25).

The value of a woman might be approximately seven years' work (Gen
29:14-30).

Inter-faith marriages are prohibited (Gen 24:3, 28:1, 28:6, Num 25:1- 9,
Ezra 9:12, Neh 10:30, 2 Cor 6:14). Divorce is forbidden (Deut
22:19, Matt 5:32, 19:9, Mark10:9-12, Luke 16:18, Rom 7:2, 1 Cor 7:10-

11,

7:39).

Better to not get married at all - although marriage is not a sin
(Matt 19:10, I Cor 7:1, 7:27-28, 7:32-34, 7:38).

How many of these Biblical principles are followed by Christians
today? Not a single one [with the possible exception of number 3 - some
Christian women may still have no choice in their marital
partner!] Nowhere in the Bible does it say, "Marriage is the God-
ordained covenantal union of one man and one woman;" in fact, it
says explicitly to the contrary! The Bible lists at least 15
polygamists (not including Herod, who is known from the historical - but
not Biblical - record to have had 9 wives), and in not a single place

does

polygamy carry with it any sense of opprobrium.
Unfortunately, the pastor mentioned above would have been far more

correct

to say that "the Bible teaches that marriage is a covenantal union of

one

man to as many women as he might want and can afford."

So the next time your favorite politician or preacher claims to use the
Bible in support of traditional marriage, ask him or her which of these

12

principles he or she is actually advocating. Probably none. Anyone who
claims to use the Bible in support of a strictly monogamous union of one
male and one female based on love,
mutuality, and commitment will be hard pressed to find 2,000 year- old
Bible verses in support of that very modern position. In fact, I daresay
they cannot. The Biblical view of marriage is not
monogamous: it is not necessarily based on love, or on any amount of
mutuality.

Most Christians would consider these Biblical principles of marriage to

be

misogynistic and repulsive - and judging by today's
standards, they'd be right. Views have changed since Biblical times, as
has our concept of marriage. Some would claim that this is the result of
the Holy Spirit working in our world; most agree that just about all of
the changes are a good thing. But if we concede that our concept of
marriage has evolved, is it not potentially arrogant to summarily

discount

the possibility that marriage should continue evolving, or even that it
might be God's will that it do so?

From the looks of the above list, it's a good thing our perspectives

have

changed from the Biblical model. Thus as we continue to dialog and
prayerfully discern God's will in the area of same-sex
marriages, we obviously cannot consider 2,000-year-old statements
made in other cultures and contexts to be all that is important.
Please do not misinterpret that I am claiming that the Bible is not
important - of course it is. It is central to my faith, as it should be
for any Christian. But to rely on solely the Bible is to
dangerously ignore two millennia of progress in the areas of
science, technology, and human rights, a sin which we dare not let
ourselves commit if the church is to remain relevant to contemporary
society at all.

To rely solely on Scripture for church policy is to ignore the
possibility that the Holy Spirit has been active at all in the
sixteen centuries since the canon was closed in 405 CE. Indeed, we need

to

consider that the Holy Spirit may be actively encouraging us today to

move

beyond a literal reading of the Bible and to refuse to become modern
Pharisees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

The

son of two Lutheran pastors, Vaughn Roste has since worshipped and

worked

in Episcopalian and Presbyterian Churches, but his
current employment is in a United Church. Holding degrees in
theology and music from two different church institutions, he
currently freelances as a writer and musician in Edmonton.
--
Pax Christi,
. Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian

Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk

My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk

Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org

The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org

To send e-mail, remove nohate from address



.
User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 10 May 2006 12:14:32 AM
"Paul" <pld1020@ptd.net> wrote in message
news:4Y2cnZ7r-Y2JzfzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...

You should read more throughly Sodom n Gomorrah Why these cities were
Judged. Which Sin was it? Let me see, the men wanted the Angels instead
of
the virgin daughters of Lot MMMMMMMMMMM, which sin , your probaly
clueless.

"Clueless"????
This excerpt does nothing to rebut the claims made.
The Angels were there to destroy S & G; since the decision had alredy been
made - what happened after that could, not in the least, be called the
reason for destruction.
Where was it said that homosexuality was the ONLY reason S & G were to be
destroyed?
Before the destruction, here was NO indication of what sin(s) they had
commited.
In the passages concerning the angels, it was NOT stated that the actions
taken against them were intended to be just for "homosexuality" - or as an
affront to god.
Considering the claim that all the men from the town wanted the angels (for
sexual purposes) - an affront seems one hell of a lot more likely than
homosexual rape. ....... and that still doesn't explain why Gomorrah was
destroyed.
Shortly after that (which you conveniently forgot to mention), was this:
Lot and His Daughters
30 Lot and his two daughters left Zoar and settled in the mountains, for he
was afraid to stay in Zoar. He and his two daughters lived in a cave. 31 One
day the older daughter said to the younger, "Our father is old, and there is
no man around here to lie with us, as is the custom all over the earth. 32
Let's get our father to drink wine and then lie with him and preserve our
family line through our father."
33 That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter
went in and lay with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when
she got up.
34 The next day the older daughter said to the younger, "Last night I lay
with my father. Let's get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and
lie with him so we can preserve our family line through our father." 35 So
they got their father to drink wine that night also, and the younger
daughter went and lay with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay
down or when she got up.
36 So both of Lot's daughters became pregnant by their father. 37 The older
daughter had a son, and she named him Moab [g] ; he is the father of the
Moabites of today. 38 The younger daughter also had a son, and she named him
Ben-Ammi [h] ; he is the father of the Ammonites of today.
So incest is ok; but (alleged) homosexuality is a severe enough sin to get
TWO cities totally destroyed - even though only ONE was implicated in acts
of a homosexual nature?
When you accuse someone of being clueless - you better be DAMNED sure your
head isn't up your ***** when you do it!

.

User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 12 May 2006 12:01:11 PM
"Paul" <pld1020@ptd.net> wrote in message
news:4Y2cnZ7r-Y2JzfzZUSdV9g@ptd.net...

You should read more throughly Sodom n Gomorrah Why these cities were
Judged. Which Sin was it? Let me see, the men wanted the Angels instead
of
the virgin daughters of Lot MMMMMMMMMMM, which sin , your probaly
clueless.

Unlike you, I did read more throughly, the story wasn't all covered in
Genesis, the sin they are accused of is lacking hospitality, pride, and a
selfish disregard for the poor (Ezekiel 16:46-50)
<snipped, old stuff>
.

User: "• Ninure Saunders"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 10 May 2006 09:22:12 AM
In article <4Y2cnZ7r-Y2JzfzZUSdV9g@ptd.net>, "Paul" <pld1020@ptd.net> wrote:
-You should read more throughly Sodom n Gomorrah Why these cities were
-Judged. Which Sin was it? Let me see, the men wanted the Angels instead of
-the virgin daughters of Lot MMMMMMMMMMM, which sin , your probaly clueless.
What does the Bible say?
This is what GOD says the sin of sodom was/is:
Ezekiel 16:49 Behold, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: pride,
fullness of bread, and prosperous ease was in her and in her daughters;
neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy.
50 They were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I
took them away as I saw good. (KJV)
Ezekiel 16:49 ³ ŒNow this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her
daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the
poor and needy. 6:50 They were haughty and did detestable things before
me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen. (NIV)
Are you caling God a liar? Or you think you know better than God?
--
Pax Christi,
• Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove your hat
.
User: "Athanasius"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 10 May 2006 05:22:07 PM
On Wed, 10 May 2006 14:22:12 GMT,

(• Ninure Saunders) wrote:

What does the Bible say?

This is what GOD says the sin of sodom was/is:

Homosexuality.
Repent!
Athanasius,

http://www.ourchurch.com/member/a/Aus_Orthodox/
If the world is against Athanasius then Athanasius is against the world.St Athanasius
.
User: "* irenic *"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 10 May 2006 06:29:07 PM
"Athanasius" <
> wrote in message
news:prp462132sn5iu611akb6e8n1m41enfth4@4ax.com...

On Wed, 10 May 2006 14:22:12 GMT,


(. Ninure Saunders) wrote:

What does the Bible say?

This is what GOD says the sin of sodom was/is:


Homosexuality.

No.
Same-sex rape (happens in prisons between heterosexuals everywhere)...
Why did you avoid commenting on the Ezekiel passage?
More - Homosexuality: an Imaginary Interview with Jesus -
http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/12135.htm

Repent!

(Pharisees' first words to 'sinners')
God loves you!
(Jesus' primary message to 'sinners')

Athanasius,


http://www.ourchurch.com/member/a/Aus_Orthodox/
If the world is against Athanasius then Athanasius is against the world.St
Athanasius

--
Shalom! Rowland Croucher
"If only it were so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere
insidiously committing evil deeds and it were necessary to separate them
from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil
cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy
a piece of his own heart?" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
http://jmm.aaa.net.au/ - 17,000 articles; 4000 jokes/funnies
.
User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 04 Jul 2006 12:39:49 PM
"* irenic *" <see_it@website.com> wrote in message
news:44627741$0$28362$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

"Athanasius" <

> wrote in message
news:prp462132sn5iu611akb6e8n1m41enfth4@4ax.com...

On Wed, 10 May 2006 14:22:12 GMT,


(. Ninure Saunders) wrote:

What does the Bible say?
This is what GOD says the sin of sodom was/is:


Homosexuality.


No. Same-sex rape (happens in prisons between heterosexuals everywhere)...
Why did you avoid commenting on the Ezekiel passage?

What and destroy their bias ? They can't let the truth get in their way, now
can they ?

More - Homosexuality: an Imaginary Interview with Jesus -
http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/12135.htm

Repent!


(Pharisees' first words to 'sinners') God loves you!
(Jesus' primary message to 'sinners')

Athanasius,


http://www.ourchurch.com/member/a/Aus_Orthodox/
If the world is against Athanasius then Athanasius is against the
world.St Athanasius


--
Shalom! Rowland Croucher

Excellent post :-)
Glenn (Christian Mystic)

"If only it were so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere
insidiously committing evil deeds and it were necessary to separate them
from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil
cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to
destroy
a piece of his own heart?" Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
http://jmm.aaa.net.au/ - 17,000 articles; 4000 jokes/funnies

.

User: "Athanasius"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 10 May 2006 06:37:38 PM
On Thu, 11 May 2006 09:29:07 +1000, "* irenic *" <see_it@website.com>
wrote:


"Athanasius" <

> wrote in message
news:prp462132sn5iu611akb6e8n1m41enfth4@4ax.com...

On Wed, 10 May 2006 14:22:12 GMT,


(. Ninure Saunders) wrote:

What does the Bible say?

This is what GOD says the sin of sodom was/is:


Homosexuality.


No.

yes


Same-sex rape (happens in prisons between heterosexuals everywhere)...

still sin.


Why did you avoid commenting on the Ezekiel passage?

because it affirms that -abominations- were present. We know which sin
is linked to the word abomination don't we Rowland?
As for pride, it is the foundation of all sins, as per the garden of
Eden, "You shall be like God."


More - Homosexuality: an Imaginary Interview with Jesus -
http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/12135.htm

I guess that means you won't be removing that abomination from your
website then?


Repent!


(Pharisees' first words to 'sinners')

St Peters first words to those who wished to become Christians (Acts
2:38)...


God loves you!

(Jesus' primary message to 'sinners')

"I will spew you out of My mouth"
Jesus' words to false Christian leaders who mixed sin and faith as if
God approves.
Feel free to continue Rowland, as you wish.
Lord have mercy.
Athanasius,

http://www.ourchurch.com/member/a/Aus_Orthodox/
If the world is against Athanasius then Athanasius is against the world.St Athanasius
.


User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 27 Jun 2006 08:02:16 PM
"Athanasius" <
> wrote in message
news:prp462132sn5iu611akb6e8n1m41enfth4@4ax.com...

On Wed, 10 May 2006 14:22:12 GMT,


(. Ninure Saunders) wrote:

What does the Bible say?

This is what GOD says the sin of Sodom was/is:

<unanounced snippage here>

Homosexuality.

Wrong, greed and heartlessness toward the poor and needy

Repent!


Athanasius,


http://www.ourchurch.com/member/a/Aus_Orthodox/
If the world is against Athanasius then Athanasius is against the world.St
Athanasius

.



User: "The Watch Dog"

Title: Re: ACLJ & Marriage 09 May 2006 11:20:01 PM
Paul wrote:

You should read more throughly Sodom n Gomorrah Why these cities were
Judged. Which Sin was it? Let me see, the men wanted the Angels instead of
the virgin daughters of Lot MMMMMMMMMMM, which sin , your probaly clueless.

I can quite reasonably be in favor of same-sex marriage and opposed to
the threatened rape of strangers mentioned in the story of Sodom.
Despite later interpretations, the sin of Sodom was NOT "want[ing] the
Angels instead of the virgin daughters of Lot" - or are you suggesting
that, had they raped the virgin daughters of Lot, there would have been
no sin committed?
The sin of Sodom is inhospitality - violence threatened to the
strangers in their midst - and arrogance ("fullness of bread," Jesus
said). It has nothing to do with consensual, adult same-sex relations,
which do not appear in the story in any way whatsoever.
If the people of Sodom treated female angels the same way, they still
would have been sinning. But it wouldn't tell us anything about
heterosexuality in general. Similarly the story of Sodom doesn't tell
use anything about homosexuality in general - just about gang rape.
.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
ACLJ Fighting CT Same Sex Marriage!
Marriage - Jay Sekulow (ACLJ) - Testimony on Fed Marriage Ammendment
Give to the ACLJ!!!
ACLJ TV Shows for online viewing!
ACLJ Fighting for Pharmacists Rights about Abortion Pill!
ACLJ
Jay Sekulow and his "ACLJ" -- PROVE that RRR's leaders TARGET the profoundly ignorant, for recruitment.
Re: come to B.C. for legal same-sex marriage
Re: ANOTHER Rapid-Fire VICTORY Over Bigotry!! Episcopal Church Recognizes Same-Sex Marriage!
Re: CHALLENGE to All Who **OPPOSE** Same-Sex Marriage
Re: What's wrong with 'gay' marriage
Poll: Majority of American Support Gay Civil Union (Why Do Creationists Hate Americans So Much?) (Re: Majority of Americans oppose gay marriage (Why Do Atheists and Communists Hate America So Much?))
Re: Mass. To End Homosexual Marriage In 2006
Queers seek first ***** marriage in Canada
Re: 4 wives + 1 husband = muslims threaten Marriage
 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER