| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"cammanaska" |
| Date: |
13 Sep 2004 10:35:34 AM |
| Object: |
Against Porn? |
http://sharonmooney.us/feedback/sam_screams_dike.html
http://sharonmooney.us/porn_index.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Ross"
To: Sharon @
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:27 AM
Subject: against porn?
How can anyone be against porn? i love it, look at some almost everyday, i
think you're upset because you don't get any. I read some of you're page and
i still can't undertsand why it is that you don't like porn, in some
paragraphs you crap on about how it is degrading but yet millions of women
still do it, some (if not most in the industry) like doing it and they get
paid well for it. Are you just angry that no one has ever offered you $20 to
take your top off?
i was reading some of the guestbook and this bit cracked me up lauging:
"The day of reckoning is coming for pornographers...I don\'t know when, but
it\'s coming"
lol, this is pretty funny, most likely said by some virgin whose mother was
a ***** and gave her up for adoption at a church doorstep. You see she knows
the 'reckoning' is coming, just not when well what about fruit pickers is
the day of 'reckoning' coming for them too. I wonder if you could tell me if
this lady ever left an email, i didn't see one and i wondered if she could
help find Lucifer, tricky bugger to find that guy but i am sure i am one the
right path.
Anyway respond if you want or you will most likely ignore it altogether,
that's right just ignore it, maybe hide under a blanket and all the bad men
will go away. *****.
Sam.
----- Original Message -----
From: sharon@
To: "Sam Ross"
Cc: ; Ed Babinksi; Steve Locks ; McCall, Harry H
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: against porn?
Hi Sam,
Just wanted to let you know how uninformed you are, you sure assume to know
a lot about me, and you know nothing. I'm sending a copy of this by
hotmail.com -- you're not suppose to harrass people by email as you've done
in your letter below.
Though it is none of your business, just for the record:
#1, men tried to lure/drag me into prostitution when I was 17 years old. (An
underaged child), including offering money. I was molested as a child at the
grand age of 14 years old. I went through years of guilt and self-hatred,
self-mutilation, suicidal, depression -- Need I explain my sexual history to
you? Is it any of your business?
I'm carbon copying two other men. If you have any questions about if Sharon
is "just a *****" etc etc etc -- ask them Sam.
#2 Ask Ed Babinski if I don't have a pretty body. I'm not afraid of my body,
because I'm beautiful. Though this world, has had an impact to make women
feel worthless, worldwide. Look at the women over in the mideast, wearing
thick black veils and body-covering -- because they're NOTHING! Pornography
exploits women in the west -- do a little research Sam.
The truth is, you are afraid of women Sam, that's why you buy magazines and
videos, paper dolls like Miss November cannot criticise you. You're afraid
to show your body in broad daylight -- women may criticise you.You need that
"therapy" from pornography because intimacy scares you. I bet you're one of
those men, who are a little afraid to be caught looking at naked men in
those magazines too. Aren't you Sam? Afraid other men might call you a
"queer" or "homosexual".
Your hot headed temperance is apparent in your email below. BTW, are you a
homophobic? Do you make a habit of going around calling lesbians "dikes"?
Why do you hate women so badly Sam? Why so many sexual hangups Sam?
Could it be, that not my body -- but yours is your issue? I have done
nothing to harm you as an individual -- and you sent your email below to me,
personally lashing out at me. The true hostility is yours, Sam, not mine.
Could it be, because so few women have wanted to have sex with you, you feel
the need to attack women, as you have done to me below?
BTW, "*****" you say? I'm completely heterosexual and comfortable with my
sexuality. You however, do not appear to be, neither are you comfortable
with the sexuality of others, if you go around screaming "*****", "queer",
etc etc etc at people you disagree with.
Sharon
.
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Against Porn? |
13 Sep 2004 10:48:49 AM |
|
|
"cammanaska" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in
news:1095089731.WqSvWa0CzEWtbMCR8D2neQ@teranews:
http://sharonmooney.us/feedback/sam_screams_dike.html
http://sharonmooney.us/porn_index.html
Hysterical, pretentious bint, isn't she? And her web site sucks more *****
than she does.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
| User: "cammanaska" |
|
| Title: Re: Against Porn? |
13 Sep 2004 11:08:18 AM |
|
|
"No 33 Secretary" <taustin+usenet@hyperbooks.com> wrote in message
news:Xns956359A82D6FBtaustinhyperbookscom@216.168.3.50...
"cammanaska" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in
news:1095089731.WqSvWa0CzEWtbMCR8D2neQ@teranews:
http://sharonmooney.us/feedback/sam_screams_dike.html
http://sharonmooney.us/porn_index.html
Perhaps you approve of people screaming "*****" or "cocksuckers" at everyone
they disagree with...
Hysterical, pretentious bint, isn't she? And her web site sucks more *****
than she does.
nah, just takes one to know one.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Against Porn? |
13 Sep 2004 11:34:22 AM |
|
|
"cammanaska" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in
news:1095091694.iZOA2HdOqMzq6rmxephvxg@teranews:
"No 33 Secretary" <taustin+usenet@hyperbooks.com> wrote in message
news:Xns956359A82D6FBtaustinhyperbookscom@216.168.3.50...
"cammanaska" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in
news:1095089731.WqSvWa0CzEWtbMCR8D2neQ@teranews:
http://sharonmooney.us/feedback/sam_screams_dike.html
http://sharonmooney.us/porn_index.html
Perhaps you approve of people screaming "*****" or "cocksuckers" at
everyone they disagree with...
Sure. Why not? If the shoe fits, somebody is bound to kick your ***** with
it.
Hysterical, pretentious bint, isn't she? And her web site sucks more
***** than she does.
nah, just takes one to know one.
Does she put out for you, for defending her shrill, hysterical prattling
online?
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "catchmerevisited" |
|
| Title: Re: Against Porn? |
15 Sep 2004 03:07:43 PM |
|
|
in article 1095089731.WqSvWa0CzEWtbMCR8D2neQ@teranews, cammanaska at
nospam@nospam.com wrote on 9/13/04 8:35 AM:
http://sharonmooney.us/feedback/sam_screams_dike.html
http://sharonmooney.us/porn_index.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Ross"
To: Sharon @
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:27 AM
Subject: against porn?
How can anyone be against porn? i love it, look at some almost everyday, i
think you're upset because you don't get any. I read some of you're page and
i still can't undertsand why it is that you don't like porn, in some
paragraphs you crap on about how it is degrading but yet millions of women
still do it, some (if not most in the industry) like doing it and they get
paid well for it. Are you just angry that no one has ever offered you $20 to
take your top off?
i was reading some of the guestbook and this bit cracked me up lauging:
"The day of reckoning is coming for pornographers...I don\'t know when, but
it\'s coming"
lol, this is pretty funny, most likely said by some virgin whose mother was
a ***** and gave her up for adoption at a church doorstep. You see she knows
the 'reckoning' is coming, just not when well what about fruit pickers is
the day of 'reckoning' coming for them too. I wonder if you could tell me if
this lady ever left an email, i didn't see one and i wondered if she could
help find Lucifer, tricky bugger to find that guy but i am sure i am one the
right path.
Anyway respond if you want or you will most likely ignore it altogether,
that's right just ignore it, maybe hide under a blanket and all the bad men
will go away. *****.
Sam.
----- Original Message -----
From: sharon@
To: "Sam Ross"
Cc: ; Ed Babinksi; Steve Locks ; McCall, Harry H
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: against porn?
Hi Sam,
Just wanted to let you know how uninformed you are, you sure assume to know
a lot about me, and you know nothing. I'm sending a copy of this by
hotmail.com -- you're not suppose to harrass people by email as you've done
in your letter below.
Though it is none of your business, just for the record:
#1, men tried to lure/drag me into prostitution when I was 17 years old. (An
underaged child), including offering money. I was molested as a child at the
grand age of 14 years old. I went through years of guilt and self-hatred,
self-mutilation, suicidal, depression -- Need I explain my sexual history to
you? Is it any of your business?
I'm carbon copying two other men. If you have any questions about if Sharon
is "just a *****" etc etc etc -- ask them Sam.
#2 Ask Ed Babinski if I don't have a pretty body. I'm not afraid of my body,
because I'm beautiful. Though this world, has had an impact to make women
feel worthless, worldwide. Look at the women over in the mideast, wearing
thick black veils and body-covering -- because they're NOTHING! Pornography
exploits women in the west -- do a little research Sam.
The truth is, you are afraid of women Sam, that's why you buy magazines and
videos, paper dolls like Miss November cannot criticise you. You're afraid
to show your body in broad daylight -- women may criticise you.You need that
"therapy" from pornography because intimacy scares you. I bet you're one of
those men, who are a little afraid to be caught looking at naked men in
those magazines too. Aren't you Sam? Afraid other men might call you a
"queer" or "homosexual".
Your hot headed temperance is apparent in your email below. BTW, are you a
homophobic? Do you make a habit of going around calling lesbians "dikes"?
Why do you hate women so badly Sam? Why so many sexual hangups Sam?
Could it be, that not my body -- but yours is your issue? I have done
nothing to harm you as an individual -- and you sent your email below to me,
personally lashing out at me. The true hostility is yours, Sam, not mine.
Could it be, because so few women have wanted to have sex with you, you feel
the need to attack women, as you have done to me below?
BTW, "*****" you say? I'm completely heterosexual and comfortable with my
sexuality. You however, do not appear to be, neither are you comfortable
with the sexuality of others, if you go around screaming "*****", "queer",
etc etc etc at people you disagree with.
Sharon
we have here a fundamental difference of values, and that the woman who
doesn't enjoy porn wishes to impose its demise on those of us, including
women (lesbian AND hetero), who do enjoy porn (I still laugh when I think of
the Lesbian strip tease on Pride TV they aired in their 'free preview').
I sympathise with your pain from your own experience, but i don't think this
individual who assaulted you was a legitimate pornographer, and certainly if
we tried to outlaw porn, more incidences of this nature likely will occur.
I am glad to see a Liberal approach to sexuality emerge in the Media, and
that even on cable channels the scenes on franchised serials are becoming
more risque, with respect to every gender orientation.
If there is anything I find DIScouraging, it is the disproportionate number
of hetero/gay scenes appearing on television, with the gay sex scenes often
outnumbering the hetero.
As sexuality becomes more acceptable among viewers, pornogrphers will have
to fight an uphill battle to compete, b/c for once the Media is giving what
most people really want: romance, sex, plot- in that order.
Mainstream pornographers provide sex, sex, plot. As a male viewer, my
recollections from viewing the latter was self-disgust immediately after
self-pleasure (at home leisure). Sexuality should NOT be revealed thus.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
