Religions > Bible > Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN!
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
09 Dec 2003 04:12:38 AM |
| Object: |
Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
Al Gore... who handily won the popular vote for President in
2000 (and may well have won the Electoral vote as well, if Bush's
partisan cronies in the Supreme Court hadn't CHEATED the
American people out of ever knowing that for *sure*, one way
or the other) -- on December 7, 2003 gave DEAN his endorsement
as the man to OUST Bush next year. This may be the key
advantage that Dean needs to ultimately sew up the nomination,
since he's already well ahead of the rest of the pack in Iowa and
New Hampshire... where the Caucus and Primary, respectively,
are now just a few weeks away!
If Dean beats Bush, the RRR cultists will be whining for years
as their hateful agendas against personal liberties spiral down into
extinction, and that'll be the BEST break Americans have gotten
since Clinton was still President!
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
| User: "Thomas Trust" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
09 Dec 2003 09:27:25 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <> wrote in message
news:3fe79cee.29689603@netnews.mchsi.com...
Al Gore... who handily won the popular vote for President in
2000 (and may well have won the Electoral vote as well, if Bush's
partisan cronies in the Supreme Court hadn't CHEATED the
American people out of ever knowing that for *sure*, one way
or the other) -- on December 7, 2003 gave DEAN his endorsement
as the man to OUST Bush next year. This may be the key
advantage that Dean needs to ultimately sew up the nomination,
since he's already well ahead of the rest of the pack in Iowa and
New Hampshire... where the Caucus and Primary, respectively,
are now just a few weeks away!
If Dean beats Bush, the RRR cultists will be whining for years
as their hateful agendas against personal liberties spiral down into
extinction, and that'll be the BEST break Americans have gotten
since Clinton was still President!
Much like you're still so bitter and whiney about the outcome of the 2000
election huh? Never mind that count after recount verified the official
results....
GET OVER IT!
The Gore endorsement means little.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
09 Dec 2003 09:32:13 AM |
|
|
"Thomas Trust" <Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote in message
news:xRlBb.286156$Dw6.969399@attbi_s02...
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fe79cee.29689603@netnews.mchsi.com...
Al Gore... who handily won the popular vote for President in
2000 (and may well have won the Electoral vote as well, if Bush's
partisan cronies in the Supreme Court hadn't CHEATED the
American people out of ever knowing that for *sure*, one way
or the other) -- on December 7, 2003 gave DEAN his endorsement
as the man to OUST Bush next year. This may be the key
advantage that Dean needs to ultimately sew up the nomination,
since he's already well ahead of the rest of the pack in Iowa and
New Hampshire... where the Caucus and Primary, respectively,
are now just a few weeks away!
If Dean beats Bush, the RRR cultists will be whining for years
as their hateful agendas against personal liberties spiral down into
extinction, and that'll be the BEST break Americans have gotten
since Clinton was still President!
Much like you're still so bitter and whiney about the outcome of the 2000
election huh? Never mind that count after recount verified the official
results....
GET OVER IT!
The Gore endorsement means little.
It shows they are desperate. They need a big name right now. The 9 clowns
running are going to split and divide the vote.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Snubis" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
09 Dec 2003 11:15:10 AM |
|
|
On Tue 09 Dec 2003 10:27:25a, "Thomas Trust" <Trust@Americanpride.com>
wrote in news:xRlBb.286156$Dw6.969399@attbi_s02:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:3fe79cee.29689603@netnews.mchsi.com...
Al Gore... who handily won the popular vote for President in
2000 (and may well have won the Electoral vote as well, if Bush's
partisan cronies in the Supreme Court hadn't CHEATED the
American people out of ever knowing that for *sure*, one way
or the other) -- on December 7, 2003 gave DEAN his endorsement
as the man to OUST Bush next year. This may be the key
advantage that Dean needs to ultimately sew up the nomination,
since he's already well ahead of the rest of the pack in Iowa and
New Hampshire... where the Caucus and Primary, respectively,
are now just a few weeks away!
If Dean beats Bush, the RRR cultists will be whining for years
as their hateful agendas against personal liberties spiral down into
extinction, and that'll be the BEST break Americans have gotten
since Clinton was still President!
Much like you're still so bitter and whiney about the outcome of the 2000
election huh? Never mind that count after recount verified the official
results....
GET OVER IT!
Hopefully once Bush is reelected, the liberals will finally quit crying
about it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
09 Dec 2003 10:44:21 PM |
|
|
Thomas Trust <Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
Al Gore... who handily won the popular vote for President in
2000 (and may well have won the Electoral vote as well, if Bush's
partisan cronies in the Supreme Court hadn't CHEATED the
American people out of ever knowing that for *sure*, one way
or the other) -- on December 7, 2003 gave DEAN his endorsement
as the man to OUST Bush next year. This may be the key
advantage that Dean needs to ultimately sew up the nomination,
since he's already well ahead of the rest of the pack in Iowa and
New Hampshire... where the Caucus and Primary, respectively,
are now just a few weeks away!
If Dean beats Bush, the RRR cultists will be whining for years
as their hateful agendas against personal liberties spiral down into
extinction, and that'll be the BEST break Americans have gotten
since Clinton was still President!
Much like you're still so bitter and whiney about the outcome of the 2000
election huh? Never mind that count after recount verified the official
results....
The ONE complete recount, which had to be done by the media because the
US Supreme Court wouldn't allow it, showed Gore the winner.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Trust" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
10 Dec 2003 12:38:09 PM |
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:br68b4$6v0$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Thomas Trust <Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
Al Gore... who handily won the popular vote for President in
2000 (and may well have won the Electoral vote as well, if Bush's
partisan cronies in the Supreme Court hadn't CHEATED the
American people out of ever knowing that for *sure*, one way
or the other) -- on December 7, 2003 gave DEAN his endorsement
as the man to OUST Bush next year. This may be the key
advantage that Dean needs to ultimately sew up the nomination,
since he's already well ahead of the rest of the pack in Iowa and
New Hampshire... where the Caucus and Primary, respectively,
are now just a few weeks away!
If Dean beats Bush, the RRR cultists will be whining for years
as their hateful agendas against personal liberties spiral down into
extinction, and that'll be the BEST break Americans have gotten
since Clinton was still President!
Much like you're still so bitter and whiney about the outcome of the 2000
election huh? Never mind that count after recount verified the official
results....
The ONE complete recount, which had to be done by the media because the
US Supreme Court wouldn't allow it, showed Gore the winner.
Cite please liar.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 01:38:33 AM |
|
|
"Thomas Trust" <Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote in message news:<lKJBb.497081$Tr4.1353689@attbi_s03>...
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:br68b4$6v0$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Thomas Trust <Trust@Americanpride.com> wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
Al Gore... who handily won the popular vote for President in
2000 (and may well have won the Electoral vote as well, if Bush's
partisan cronies in the Supreme Court hadn't CHEATED the
American people out of ever knowing that for *sure*, one way
or the other) -- on December 7, 2003 gave DEAN his endorsement
as the man to OUST Bush next year. This may be the key
advantage that Dean needs to ultimately sew up the nomination,
since he's already well ahead of the rest of the pack in Iowa and
New Hampshire... where the Caucus and Primary, respectively,
are now just a few weeks away!
If Dean beats Bush, the RRR cultists will be whining for years
as their hateful agendas against personal liberties spiral down into
extinction, and that'll be the BEST break Americans have gotten
since Clinton was still President!
Much like you're still so bitter and whiney about the outcome of the 2000
election huh? Never mind that count after recount verified the official
results....
The ONE complete recount, which had to be done by the media because the
US Supreme Court wouldn't allow it, showed Gore the winner.
Cite please liar.
Ray still doesn't understand that Florida election law includes a
certification deadline.
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Etobian" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 07:46:41 AM |
|
|
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres) wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 08:13:26 AM |
|
|
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres) wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Military members are being reminded all over the world as we speak, about
that very thing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 01:40:12 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres) wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
Military members are being reminded all over the world as we speak, about
that very thing.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 01:58:45 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres) wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
Except no laws were broken.
Military members are being reminded all over the world as we speak, about
that very thing.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 02:10:48 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:58:45 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres) wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
Except no laws were broken.
Yes, they were. Admitting illegal ballots is illegal. Or are you
re-defining that word again?
It's a sad commentary on your abilities in the law-enforcement arena
(and on your integrity) that you'll only pronounce something illegal
when it's done by someone you don't like.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 02:45:37 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:8fsmtvs9lbfrcsgrtta9f5m3tt4dutb4rf@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 14:58:45 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres)
wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The
fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the
beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here
and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
Except no laws were broken.
Yes, they were. Admitting illegal ballots is illegal.
Quotes
Or are you
re-defining that word again?
It's a sad commentary on your abilities in the law-enforcement arena
(and on your integrity) that you'll only pronounce something illegal
when it's done by someone you don't like.
It is a sad thing when you snipped away my sources as well. Why? What are
you afraid of? Confrontation?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Etobian" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 03:16:32 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:10:48 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
Yes, they were. Admitting illegal ballots is illegal. Or are you
re-defining that word again?
It's a sad commentary on your abilities in the law-enforcement arena
(and on your integrity) that you'll only pronounce something illegal
when it's done by someone you don't like.
How were those ballots illegal, exactly?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 03:19:48 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 21:16:32 GMT, The Etobian
<i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:10:48 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
Yes, they were. Admitting illegal ballots is illegal. Or are you
re-defining that word again?
It's a sad commentary on your abilities in the law-enforcement arena
(and on your integrity) that you'll only pronounce something illegal
when it's done by someone you don't like.
How were those ballots illegal, exactly?
Ballots that are counted in violation of law are illegal. Seems a
simple connection to me.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 04:15:49 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:di0ntvknjegbj5r777h5hrskats2jppmc3@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 21:16:32 GMT, The Etobian
<i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:10:48 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
Yes, they were. Admitting illegal ballots is illegal. Or are you
re-defining that word again?
It's a sad commentary on your abilities in the law-enforcement arena
(and on your integrity) that you'll only pronounce something illegal
when it's done by someone you don't like.
How were those ballots illegal, exactly?
Ballots that are counted in violation of law are illegal. Seems a
simple connection to me.
What law was violated?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 04:39:01 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:15:49 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:di0ntvknjegbj5r777h5hrskats2jppmc3@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 21:16:32 GMT, The Etobian
<i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:10:48 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
Yes, they were. Admitting illegal ballots is illegal. Or are you
re-defining that word again?
It's a sad commentary on your abilities in the law-enforcement arena
(and on your integrity) that you'll only pronounce something illegal
when it's done by someone you don't like.
How were those ballots illegal, exactly?
Ballots that are counted in violation of law are illegal. Seems a
simple connection to me.
What law was violated?
The one that says when ballots are invalid, you tit.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 04:48:41 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:k75ntv806efo98ghabck7cnbqcvsg6vktp@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:15:49 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:di0ntvknjegbj5r777h5hrskats2jppmc3@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 21:16:32 GMT, The Etobian
<i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:10:48 -0500, Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com>
wrote:
Yes, they were. Admitting illegal ballots is illegal. Or are you
re-defining that word again?
It's a sad commentary on your abilities in the law-enforcement arena
(and on your integrity) that you'll only pronounce something illegal
when it's done by someone you don't like.
How were those ballots illegal, exactly?
Ballots that are counted in violation of law are illegal. Seems a
simple connection to me.
What law was violated?
The one that says when ballots are invalid, you tit.
Another direct question avoided by Adam.
Lets try another.
Can you state the specific law?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 02:05:30 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres) wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_080901.htm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most likely attacking
the source
Military members are being reminded all over the world as we speak, about
that very thing.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 02:13:05 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:05:30 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres) wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_080901.htm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most likely attacking
the source
I see those sources attack Gore for trying to get ballots that were
CLEARLY not legal (lack of postmark is one example that's brought up)
to not be counted.
Oh, the horror! Imagine that Gore would want invalid ballots
disqualified! He'll be eating orphans next!
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 02:46:34 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sjsmtv8m1lggumq53p9tlfrq0gftd9af5i@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:05:30 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres)
wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The
fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the
beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here
and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_080901.h
tm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most likely
attacking
the source
I see those sources attack Gore for trying to get ballots that were
CLEARLY not legal (lack of postmark is one example that's brought up)
to not be counted.
Oh, the horror! Imagine that Gore would want invalid ballots
disqualified! He'll be eating orphans next!
NewsFlash
The absentee ballots have ALWAYS had this problem for years Adam. In case
you didn't know it, some locations they can't get post marks.
Oh the horror, that democrats are afraid of the military vote.
They should be, especially now.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 03:10:31 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:46:34 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sjsmtv8m1lggumq53p9tlfrq0gftd9af5i@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:05:30 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres)
wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush. The
fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the
beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here
and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_080901.h
tm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most likely
attacking
the source
I see those sources attack Gore for trying to get ballots that were
CLEARLY not legal (lack of postmark is one example that's brought up)
to not be counted.
Oh, the horror! Imagine that Gore would want invalid ballots
disqualified! He'll be eating orphans next!
NewsFlash
The absentee ballots have ALWAYS had this problem for years Adam. In case
you didn't know it, some locations they can't get post marks.
And yet they're STILL INVALID, and you just proved my point - seems
Republicans will flout the law when it's in their favour to do so, and
you'll applaud it.
Oh the horror, that democrats are afraid of the military vote.
They should be, especially now.
Yes, it's absolutely TERRIBLE that somebody should actually want to
observe the LAW by not counting invalid ballots.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 03:44:52 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:jtvmtvkjgpld1ibqch7b1es0fa6orq8nbc@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:46:34 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sjsmtv8m1lggumq53p9tlfrq0gftd9af5i@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:05:30 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres)
wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush.
The
fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their
problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the
beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here
and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen
and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military
absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_080901.
h
tm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most likely
attacking
the source
I see those sources attack Gore for trying to get ballots that were
CLEARLY not legal (lack of postmark is one example that's brought up)
to not be counted.
Oh, the horror! Imagine that Gore would want invalid ballots
disqualified! He'll be eating orphans next!
NewsFlash
The absentee ballots have ALWAYS had this problem for years Adam. In
case
you didn't know it, some locations they can't get post marks.
And yet they're STILL INVALID, and you just proved my point - seems
Republicans will flout the law when it's in their favour to do so, and
you'll applaud it.
So you want to deny military members their voice, simply because they are in
locations where they can't get post marks.
What a shame.
Oh the horror, that democrats are afraid of the military vote.
They should be, especially now.
Yes, it's absolutely TERRIBLE that somebody should actually want to
observe the LAW by not counting invalid ballots.
What is terrible is people like you, who want to deny military members their
voice simply because they are in remote areas where they can't get post
marks.
Luckily for us, our Judicial system did care enough to allow them to vote.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 04:38:10 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:44:52 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:jtvmtvkjgpld1ibqch7b1es0fa6orq8nbc@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:46:34 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sjsmtv8m1lggumq53p9tlfrq0gftd9af5i@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:05:30 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres)
wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush.
The
fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their
problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the
beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts here
and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise servicemen
and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military
absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_080901.
h
tm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most likely
attacking
the source
I see those sources attack Gore for trying to get ballots that were
CLEARLY not legal (lack of postmark is one example that's brought up)
to not be counted.
Oh, the horror! Imagine that Gore would want invalid ballots
disqualified! He'll be eating orphans next!
NewsFlash
The absentee ballots have ALWAYS had this problem for years Adam. In
case
you didn't know it, some locations they can't get post marks.
And yet they're STILL INVALID, and you just proved my point - seems
Republicans will flout the law when it's in their favour to do so, and
you'll applaud it.
So you want to deny military members their voice, simply because they are in
locations where they can't get post marks.
What a shame.
So the military has no responsibility for this? They have a mail
system that doesn't allow votes to be valid and there's nothing they
should do?
Or do you think that perhaps the Republican governor in Florida should
have done something to fix a known flaw *before* it became a problem?
Nah, you wouldn't think that. Not when you can mindlessly blame a
Democrat.
Oh the horror, that democrats are afraid of the military vote.
They should be, especially now.
Yes, it's absolutely TERRIBLE that somebody should actually want to
observe the LAW by not counting invalid ballots.
What is terrible is people like you, who want to deny military members their
voice simply because they are in remote areas where they can't get post
marks.
Luckily for us, our Judicial system did care enough to allow them to vote.
It's a shame that the military doesn't care enough about their members
to allow valid votes to be mailed, isn't it?
How sad that you don't care enough about your chosen profession to
want to see law enforcement actually happen.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 05:00:13 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a05ntvkqv4shmgbffqd71t31pecnjmn73k@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:44:52 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:jtvmtvkjgpld1ibqch7b1es0fa6orq8nbc@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:46:34 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sjsmtv8m1lggumq53p9tlfrq0gftd9af5i@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:05:30 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres)
wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush.
The
fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their
problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the
beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts
here
and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise
servicemen
and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military
absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_080901
..
h
tm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most likely
attacking
the source
I see those sources attack Gore for trying to get ballots that were
CLEARLY not legal (lack of postmark is one example that's brought
up)
to not be counted.
Oh, the horror! Imagine that Gore would want invalid ballots
disqualified! He'll be eating orphans next!
NewsFlash
The absentee ballots have ALWAYS had this problem for years Adam. In
case
you didn't know it, some locations they can't get post marks.
And yet they're STILL INVALID, and you just proved my point - seems
Republicans will flout the law when it's in their favour to do so, and
you'll applaud it.
So you want to deny military members their voice, simply because they are
in
locations where they can't get post marks.
What a shame.
So the military has no responsibility for this?
Care to show us how they can change other countries post markings?
They have a mail
system that doesn't allow votes to be valid and there's nothing they
should do?
It has been this way for a very very long time, well before either one of us
was even born.
Care to show us how they can correct this problem?
Or do you think that perhaps the Republican governor in Florida should
have done something to fix a known flaw *before* it became a problem?
You think this happens in just Florida?
Nah, you wouldn't think that. Not when you can mindlessly blame a
Democrat.
I will blame anyone when they are wrong, in this case it is Democrats that
tried to block the military members votes.
Reason: Because they knew that Al Gore wouldn't be getting the military
votes.
Regardless, I am still waiting for you to state the specific law that was
violated, as you claimed.
AND
I want to know why you want to deny military members their voice?
Oh the horror, that democrats are afraid of the military vote.
They should be, especially now.
Yes, it's absolutely TERRIBLE that somebody should actually want to
observe the LAW by not counting invalid ballots.
What is terrible is people like you, who want to deny military members
their
voice simply because they are in remote areas where they can't get post
marks.
Luckily for us, our Judicial system did care enough to allow them to
vote.
It's a shame that the military doesn't care enough about their members
to allow valid votes to be mailed, isn't it?
Care to explain how it is the military's fault and what they have not done?
How sad that you don't care enough about your chosen profession to
want to see law enforcement actually happen.
How said it is, for you, that you want to deny our men and women in uniform
their vote.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 05:25:25 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:00:13 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a05ntvkqv4shmgbffqd71t31pecnjmn73k@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:44:52 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:jtvmtvkjgpld1ibqch7b1es0fa6orq8nbc@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:46:34 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sjsmtv8m1lggumq53p9tlfrq0gftd9af5i@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:05:30 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800, (Sneechres)
wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than Bush.
The
fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their
problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the
beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few districts
here
and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise
servicemen
and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military
absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_080901
.
h
tm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most likely
attacking
the source
I see those sources attack Gore for trying to get ballots that were
CLEARLY not legal (lack of postmark is one example that's brought
up)
to not be counted.
Oh, the horror! Imagine that Gore would want invalid ballots
disqualified! He'll be eating orphans next!
NewsFlash
The absentee ballots have ALWAYS had this problem for years Adam. In
case
you didn't know it, some locations they can't get post marks.
And yet they're STILL INVALID, and you just proved my point - seems
Republicans will flout the law when it's in their favour to do so, and
you'll applaud it.
So you want to deny military members their voice, simply because they are
in
locations where they can't get post marks.
What a shame.
So the military has no responsibility for this?
Care to show us how they can change other countries post markings?
The military has its OWN mail system, you idiot.
They have a mail
system that doesn't allow votes to be valid and there's nothing they
should do?
It has been this way for a very very long time, well before either one of us
was even born.
Better keep a system that doesn't work, because it's old.
Care to show us how they can correct this problem?
Or do you think that perhaps the Republican governor in Florida should
have done something to fix a known flaw *before* it became a problem?
You think this happens in just Florida?
Your point? The fact that it happens elsewhere simply makes the need
for a solution MORE pressing.
Nah, you wouldn't think that. Not when you can mindlessly blame a
Democrat.
I will blame anyone when they are wrong, in this case it is Democrats that
tried to block the military members votes.
No, the Democrats tried to enforce election law.
Reason: Because they knew that Al Gore wouldn't be getting the military
votes.
Better back that up. A memo will do.
Regardless, I am still waiting for you to state the specific law that was
violated, as you claimed.
The law that sets out the validity of ballots, you idiot.
AND
I want to know why you want to deny military members their voice?
Why do you want to allow Republicans to break the law?
Oh the horror, that democrats are afraid of the military vote.
They should be, especially now.
Yes, it's absolutely TERRIBLE that somebody should actually want to
observe the LAW by not counting invalid ballots.
What is terrible is people like you, who want to deny military members
their
voice simply because they are in remote areas where they can't get post
marks.
Luckily for us, our Judicial system did care enough to allow them to
vote.
It's a shame that the military doesn't care enough about their members
to allow valid votes to be mailed, isn't it?
Care to explain how it is the military's fault and what they have not done?
When the military requires someone to move to a location where they
cannot fulfill the requirements to vote, it's up to the military to
make voting possible.
Or do you think that the military should be allowed to deny the vote
to overseas posts?
How sad that you don't care enough about your chosen profession to
want to see law enforcement actually happen.
How said it is, for you, that you want to deny our men and women in uniform
their vote.
How sad that you think laws don't apply to Republicans.
---
"The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation."
-Pierre Trudeau, 1967
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
13 Dec 2003 07:05:39 PM |
|
|
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:ko7ntvknmqai7rsntgmi4hofh2f11qms3i@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:00:13 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:a05ntvkqv4shmgbffqd71t31pecnjmn73k@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:44:52 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:jtvmtvkjgpld1ibqch7b1es0fa6orq8nbc@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:46:34 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:sjsmtv8m1lggumq53p9tlfrq0gftd9af5i@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:05:30 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:bnqmtv48ng3c11lfsj4u4rqfvm5vic0r6o@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 09:13:26 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedstoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"The Etobian" <i2l1zjh802@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:4u5mtvsgq2fj6id38hv2sp9pmrvp0c7s9i@4ax.com...
On 12 Dec 2003 23:38:33 -0800,
(Sneechres)
wrote:
Gore may very well have had more votes in Florida than
Bush.
The
fact
that the Democrats couldn't count them in time was their
problem.
All Gore had to do was to request a full recount from the
beginning.
Instead, he played games and concentrated on a few
districts
here
and
there.
And of course, doing what he could to disenfranchise
servicemen
and
women overseas was exceptionally brilliant for a would-be
commander-in-chief.
Exactly.
And don't forget the tricks they tried to pull with military
absentee
ballots.
Would that be the ballots that the Republicans had admitted
even
though those same ballots weren't legal? Those ballots?
You defend the breaking of election law, Bobby. Why is that?
http://www.americasvoices.org/avarc2001/archives2001/CorsiD/CorsiD_08090
1
.
h
tm
http://www.nljonline.com/December2000/military.htm
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/5/8/225831.shtml
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/demCHEATocrat.htm
Forgot to add a few things last message
Although I am sure you will have some B.S. response. Most
likely
attacking
the source
I see those sources attack Gore for trying to get ballots that
were
CLEARLY not legal (lack of postmark is one example that's brought
up)
to not be counted.
Oh, the horror! Imagine that Gore would want invalid ballots
disqualified! He'll be eating orphans next!
NewsFlash
The absentee ballots have ALWAYS had this problem for years Adam.
In
case
you didn't know it, some locations they can't get post marks.
And yet they're STILL INVALID, and you just proved my point - seems
Republicans will flout the law when it's in their favour to do so,
and
you'll applaud it.
So you want to deny military members their voice, simply because they
are
in
locations where they can't get post marks.
What a shame.
So the military has no responsibility for this?
Care to show us how they can change other countries post markings?
The military has its OWN mail system, you idiot.
Explain to us the how the military uses post marks
They have a mail
system that doesn't allow votes to be valid and there's nothing they
should do?
It has been this way for a very very long time, well before either one of
us
was even born.
Better keep a system that doesn't work, because it's old.
Care to show us how they can correct this problem?
No answer?
Or do you think that perhaps the Republican governor in Florida should
have done something to fix a known flaw *before* it became a problem?
You think this happens in just Florida?
Your point? The fact that it happens elsewhere simply makes the need
for a solution MORE pressing.
The point is, that this is the only time that democrats cried fowl. And the
reason being, they were scared they would lose the vote because Gore did NOT
have military support.
Nah, you wouldn't think that. Not when you can mindlessly blame a
Democrat.
I will blame anyone when they are wrong, in this case it is Democrats
that
tried to block the military members votes.
No, the Democrats tried to enforce election law.
I see, Democrats tried to enforce a election law in Florida when they
thought they would lose
AND
Ignored an election law in New Jersey when they thought they would lose.
You are helping me out a lot Adam in displaying how Democrats operate.
Thanks!!!
Reason: Because they knew that Al Gore wouldn't be getting the military
votes.
Better back that up. A memo will do.
I am going to use your excuse
OPINION
Regardless, I am still waiting for you to state the specific law that was
violated, as you claimed.
The law that sets out the validity of ballots, you idiot.
What law was that Adam?
You don't even know
AND
I want to know why you want to deny military members their voice?
Why do you want to allow Republicans to break the law?
I don't want to allow Republicans to break the law.
I want to know why you turn your head when Democrats ignore tha law?
Oh the horror, that democrats are afraid of the military vote.
They should be, especially now.
Yes, it's absolutely TERRIBLE that somebody should actually want to
observe the LAW by not counting invalid ballots.
What is terrible is people like you, who want to deny military members
their
voice simply because they are in remote areas where they can't get
post
marks.
Luckily for us, our Judicial system did care enough to allow them to
vote.
It's a shame that the military doesn't care enough about their members
to allow valid votes to be mailed, isn't it?
Care to explain how it is the military's fault and what they have not
done?
When the military requires someone to move to a location where they
cannot fulfill the requirements to vote, it's up to the military to
make voting possible.
They do, it is called a voting drive. Usually a lower ranking Lt. is in
charge.
Members cast their votes using Absentee ballots, and they are shipped off.
Or do you think that the military should be allowed to deny the vote
to overseas posts?
I think that the military men and women were done a great dis-service by
your party of choice.
How sad that you don't care enough about your chosen profession to
want to see law enforcement actually happen.
How said it is, for you, that you want to deny our men and women in
uniform
their vote.
How sad that you think laws don't apply to Republicans.
How sad you turn your head away when Democrats ignore the election laws.
New Jersey 2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Al Gore -- Our ELECTED President -- Endorses DEAN! |
14 Dec 2003 06:01:33 PM |
|
|
In article < | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |