Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)?



 Religions > Bible > Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "Pastor Dave"
Date: 08 Jan 2005 07:37:47 PM
Object: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)?
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.

User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 09 Jan 2005 10:18:53 AM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:6m21u09298uh6eebtlfo9urhq5a10fkfhc@4ax.com...
and the thousands of other times moronic fanatics CLAIMED he was going to
come back?
Or should we go directlly to the "do you have ANY evidence that the Geezus
you bellow about actually existed", first!?!?!?
.
User: "Robert"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 09 Jan 2005 12:05:59 PM
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:18:53 -0500, "ZenIsWhen"
<here'slooking@youkid.com> wrote:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:6m21u09298uh6eebtlfo9urhq5a10fkfhc@4ax.com...

and the thousands of other times moronic fanatics CLAIMED he was going to
come back?

Or should we go directlly to the "do you have ANY evidence that the Geezus
you bellow about actually existed", first!?!?!?

If you want to know if Jesus really existed check this out:
www.grabtheglory.com/jesus.html
Robert
www.grabtheglory.com
.
User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 10 Jan 2005 02:02:33 AM
<Robert> wrote in message news:bis2u0pmnh6r71sv217lns7g7desufj0r7@4ax.com...

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:18:53 -0500, "ZenIsWhen"
<here'slooking@youkid.com> wrote:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:6m21u09298uh6eebtlfo9urhq5a10fkfhc@4ax.com...

and the thousands of other times moronic fanatics CLAIMED he was going to
come back?

Or should we go directlly to the "do you have ANY evidence that the

Geezus

you bellow about actually existed", first!?!?!?


If you want to know if Jesus really existed check this out:
www.grabtheglory.com/jesus.html

There is ARGUABLE evidence that a man named Jesus existed.
There is NO evidence that the Jesus bellowed about in the bible actually
existed.
NO amount of repeated biblical fairy tales is going to change that fact.
.



User: "CDumont"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 09 Jan 2005 12:31:17 AM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:6m21u09298uh6eebtlfo9urhq5a10fkfhc@4ax.com...



--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17

According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God bless
.
User: "David Roman"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 09 Jan 2005 05:50:24 AM
CDumont wrote:

"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:6m21u09298uh6eebtlfo9urhq5a10fkfhc@4ax.com...



--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation

of the

fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God

bless
Dear CDumont,
What is the scriptural reference to 1948 and 2018? If that is true,
can you explain what Jesus meant when he said this:
Mark 9:1 He went on to say, "In solemn truth I tell you that some of
those who are standing here will certainly not taste death till they
have seen the Kingdom of God already come in power."
I know it seems like a loaded question, but I have heard Pastor Dave's
side of the argument and I'm curious to know what your side of the
argument is.
Please, no links or borrowed arguments.
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 09 Jan 2005 09:49:57 AM
On 9 Jan 2005 03:50:24 -0800, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "David Roman"
<davidroman28dontspamme@yahoo.com> pontificated:

According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation
of the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God

bless



Dear CDumont,
What is the scriptural reference to 1948 and 2018? If that is true,
can you explain what Jesus meant when he said this:

Mark 9:1 He went on to say, "In solemn truth I tell you that some of
those who are standing here will certainly not taste death till they
have seen the Kingdom of God already come in power."

I know it seems like a loaded question, but I have heard Pastor Dave's
side of the argument and I'm curious to know what your side of the
argument is.

Please, no links or borrowed arguments.

Matthew 16:27-28
27) For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.


User: "bob young"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 09 Jan 2005 04:48:07 AM
CDumont wrote:

"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:6m21u09298uh6eebtlfo9urhq5a10fkfhc@4ax.com...



--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God bless

Groan
"I can believe anything, provided it is incredible."
[Oscar Wilde]
.

User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 09 Jan 2005 09:46:36 AM
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:31:17 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:

According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God bless

Actually, Jesus never said, "in the generation of the
fig tree".
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.
User: "CDumont"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 09 Jan 2005 09:55:52 PM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rdk2u0po5s2meur8dlg9pcmm58ppjup0l8@4ax.com...

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:31:17 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God
bless


Actually, Jesus never said, "in the generation of the
fig tree".


--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17

I n verse 32 Jesus said, now learn the parable of the fig tree, have you
learned it? thats the generation he was talking about in verse 34, If you
want i'll teach it to you. God bless
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 10 Jan 2005 08:42:36 AM
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:55:52 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rdk2u0po5s2meur8dlg9pcmm58ppjup0l8@4ax.com...

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:31:17 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God
bless


Actually, Jesus never said, "in the generation of the
fig tree".


--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17


I n verse 32 Jesus said, now learn the parable of the fig tree, have you
learned it? thats the generation he was talking about in verse 34, If you
want i'll teach it to you. God bless

I know what the popular idea is. Jesus however, did
not use the word "generation" there. Nor did He say,
"This is what I mean when I say, "this generation".
Reading through the chapter clearly shows that He was
speaking to those standing in front of Him. Jesus
simply used the example of a fig tree to demonstrate
what He was saying. If you disagree, then please
explain the following statement, in which Jesus says
that He will come in judgment and His kingdom, before
all of the Apostles died...
Matthew 16:27-28
27) For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.
There is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.
User: "CDumont"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 10 Jan 2005 04:34:35 PM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:kq45u0duskhvj24nue4ip44h40bcoo6f93@4ax.com...

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:55:52 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rdk2u0po5s2meur8dlg9pcmm58ppjup0l8@4ax.com...

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:31:17 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of
the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God
bless


Actually, Jesus never said, "in the generation of the
fig tree".


--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17


I n verse 32 Jesus said, now learn the parable of the fig tree, have you
learned it? thats the generation he was talking about in verse 34, If you
want i'll teach it to you. God bless


I know what the popular idea is. Jesus however, did
not use the word "generation" there. Nor did He say,
"This is what I mean when I say, "this generation".
Reading through the chapter clearly shows that He was
speaking to those standing in front of Him. Jesus
simply used the example of a fig tree to demonstrate
what He was saying. If you disagree, then please
explain the following statement, in which Jesus says
that He will come in judgment and His kingdom, before
all of the Apostles died...

Matthew 16:27-28

27) For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.

There is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.


--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17

Pastor;
It is very important to follow the subject and the object in the
Scripturs, in chapter 24, the subject is end time prophecy,verse 3. tell us
when shall these things be? and what shall be the signs of thy coming, and
of the end of the world. The rest of the chapter explains the signs of his
coming and the time of is coming, not the day or the hour but the
generation, if you like i could explain every verse.
Chapter 16 has noting to do with end time prophecy,the subject is in
verse 21, how that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the
elders and chief priest and scribes, and be KILLED, and be raised again the
third day. verse 27 For the son of man shall come in the glory of his father
with his angels, thats Heaven. Most of the people he was talking to were
there when he was killed and went to his glory, Heaven, except Judah, as far
as i know he's the only one that was not there. God bless
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 10 Jan 2005 04:57:41 PM
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:34:35 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:

"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:kq45u0duskhvj24nue4ip44h40bcoo6f93@4ax.com...

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:55:52 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rdk2u0po5s2meur8dlg9pcmm58ppjup0l8@4ax.com...

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:31:17 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of
the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God
bless


Actually, Jesus never said, "in the generation of the
fig tree".



I n verse 32 Jesus said, now learn the parable of the fig tree, have you
learned it? thats the generation he was talking about in verse 34, If you
want i'll teach it to you. God bless


I know what the popular idea is. Jesus however, did
not use the word "generation" there. Nor did He say,
"This is what I mean when I say, "this generation".
Reading through the chapter clearly shows that He was
speaking to those standing in front of Him. Jesus
simply used the example of a fig tree to demonstrate
what He was saying. If you disagree, then please
explain the following statement, in which Jesus says
that He will come in judgment and His kingdom, before
all of the Apostles died...

Matthew 16:27-28

27) For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.

There is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.


Pastor;
It is very important to follow the subject and the object in the
Scripturs, in chapter 24, the subject is end time prophecy,verse 3. tell us
when shall these things be? and what shall be the signs of thy coming, and
of the end of the world.

Actually, you are mistaken. The Greek word there
means, "age", not world. The Greek word for the globe
of the Earth is "kosmos". The word here is, "aeon",
which means, "an age". They are asking when the end of
the age is, not the end of the planet.
It is clear that the Apostles thought that the end
would come in their lifetime and that Jesus gave them
this idea. You would be forced to claim that Jesus let
them think this, because He didn't want them to be lazy
about their faith. But wait a minute... it would
still be a lie for Jesus to make them think it was
going to happen in their lifetime and that they needed
to be on guard, if He was really talking about some
future generation in Matthew 24 (as people like you are
forced to claim) and not about the current generation.
Isn't a lie a lie? Do we worship a God that lies?
Heaven forbid! "Let God be true and every man a liar".
Why don't you apply that here? And what about when the
Bible says that "God is not a man, that He should lie"?
The fact is, that when speaking in Matthew 24, Jesus
discussed the Temple standing there in front of them
and if He wanted them to think of some other
generation, then He wouldn't have said, "YOU", but
rather, "THEY", when He spoke of the generation that
would see the things He discussed. That's just plain
common sense.
I.e., get yourself out of the 21st century and read it
as if you were a first century Jew. This is the
problem. Atheists point at Christians and laugh,
because while they claim to be taking it literally,
they play word games with Mat 24:34 and the word,
"generation". It's a contradiction to claim it is a
literal chapter and then claim that "this generation"
doesn't mean exactly what it says. So either Jesus was
wrong, or, His words aren't all meant literally, which
is obvious to anyone who is familiar with the Old
Testament and its use of picture language, such as when
Ezekiel prophesied about Egypt, which was fulfilled in
the past and talked about the Sun and Moon going dark
and God riding on a cloud in judgment. Yet you would
ignore that, or try to talk around it, since they
didn't see God physically riding on a cloud. Why?
That is inconsistent and hypocritical. You would have
to try to claim that a fulfilled prophecy did not take
place yet, when any Bible student with half a brain
would know that it is a prophecy that was fulfilled a
long time ago.
Do yourself a favor and try reading Matthew 24 again
and note the use of the word "YOU" and see if it makes
sense (especially in light of vs 1-2 & v34) to think
that it meant some future generation. Put aside your
problem with some of the passages for now, due to your
thinking He was being literal in all of them and just
read it to see if it makes sense to say "YOU", instead
of "THEY" in that chapter, if He is speaking of some
future generation. Once again, do not go back to the
"He didn't want them to be lazy about their faith
argument". That is covered above. The simple fact is,
that if I said to you that you should watch for
something, you would start watching. You wouldn't be
expecting some generation 2,000 years from now to be
the ones who should watch for it.
You would also know that I was talking about you, in
the sentence that I just typed, which said, "If I said
to YOU...". Do you see what I'm saying? Why do the
rules of common sense in language go out the window for
you, when it comes to the words of Jesus and the
Apostles? Did Jesus say that we should become blind to
common sense in understanding what the word "YOU"
means? Of course not.
When He told the Pharisees that they were hypocrites,
did He mean the Pharisees of the 21st century? Of
course not. And how many people, when studying the
text in Matthew 24 fail to note the following passages,
which come just before Matthew 24, which provide the
context for Matthew 24? Read these passages from
Matthew 23 and note the following...
1) Who is Jesus talking TO?
2) Who is Jesus talking ABOUT?
3) WHERE is He talking about?
4) WHERE WAS HE when He said these things (the answer
is in Mat 24:1)?
5) THEN read Matthew 24:2 & 34 and see what comes to
light.
I have added some caps to the text, to highlight
certain things. Please read it carefully and slowly.
Matthew 23:29-39
29) Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish
the sepulchres of the righteous,
30) And say, If WE had been in the days of OUR fathers,
we would not have been partakers with them in the blood
of the prophets.
31) Wherefore YE be witnesses unto YOURSELVES, that YE
are the children of them which killed the prophets.
32) Fill YE up then the measure of YOUR fathers.
33) YE serpents, YE GENERATION of vipers, how can YE
escape the damnation of hell?
34) Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and
wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill
and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your
synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:
35) That upon YOU may come all the righteous blood shed
upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto
the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom YE slew
between the temple and the altar.
36) Verily I say unto you, ALL THESE THINGS shall come
upon THIS GENERATION.
37) O JERUSALEM, JERUSALEM, THOU that killest the
prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto THEE,
how often would I have gathered THY children together,
even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings,
and YE WOULD NOT!
38) Behold, YOUR HOUSE is left unto you desolate.
39) For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth,
till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the
name of the Lord.
Answers to questions asked above.
1) The Scribes and Pharisees.
2) The generation present at the time He said it
(verses 31-33).
3) Jerusalem (v37).
4) In the Temple in Jerusalem (v38).
Note the fact that Jesus says He is talking about
Jerusalem and the use of "this generation". Also note
that Matthew 24:1 tells us that Jesus was in the Temple
when He said this. Thus, we know "house = temple".
Now go on and read the passages I noted previously
(Matthew 24:1-2 & 34) and see how it reads.
And of course, what happened? Read up on 70 A.D..
You may not think that those things didn't happen in 70
A.D., but they did. But hey, since you believe it to
be literal, let's try your belief out...
Stars falling from heaven...
Matthew 24:29-30
29) Immediately after the tribulation of those days
shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give
her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and
the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30) And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in
heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth
mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the
clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
I think we can agree that v30 comes after v29. :)
I think we can also agree that Jesus is describing the
events in v30 as coming after v29, by the use of the
words, "And then...".
Now, the first thing to understand, is that a star
could not fall to Earth. A star is many times bigger
than the Earth and if anything, the Earth would get
sucked into its gravitational pull and not vice versa.
But assuming that it could happen and a star struck the
Earth, it would disintegrate the Earth (this would
actually happen before it even got close to the Earth).
In other words, the Earth would be gone, gone, gone.
Now that we have established basic scientific fact,
tell me, how will there be any tribes left on the
Earth, which wouldn't even be here, to mourn (v30)?
You need to explain that one to me, under your literal
approach to Matthew 24.
And just so you know, I will not accept a response that
says it's meteorites.
1) You claim literalism in the text.
2) Jesus said "stars".
3) If He meant meteorites, he could have said, "burning
rocks", or something to that effect. He didn't, so it
is stars and NOT meteorites. That is simply an attempt
to get around the text that you claim is LITERAL.
You also forget what Jesus said...
"Verily I say unto you, THIS GENERATION shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
Why don't you take that literally?
Let's look at a couple more verses from Matthew 24, in
light of the above...
Matthew 24:1-2,15-16,20
1) And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple:
and his disciples came to him for to show him the
buildings of the temple.
2) And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these
things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left
here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown
down.
Jesus is talking about the destruction of the temple
and the surrounding area. He pointed at a temple that
was standing. He said, "Do you see THESE THINGS?".
That destruction happened in 70 A.D.. But you think
that the Apostles should have skipped that one and
waited thousands of years for another temple?
15) When ye therefore shall see the abomination of
desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in
the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)
16) Then let them which be in Judea flee into the
mountains:
Let them IN JUDAEA flee to the mountains. Now why
would He specify Judaea and tell them to flee to the
mountains, if it was a global event and the stars were
going to fall to the Earth? What good would it do?
20) But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter,
neither on the sabbath day:
Why would He tell them to pray that it wasn't on a
Sabbath day? Easy, because during the Sabbath, they
could only walk about 3/4 mile and that wouldn't be far
enough to avoid what was happening to Jerusalem.
But let's assume for a moment that it is speaking of
Him coming to Earth. Is it a literal statement, as in
a visual event for humans to visually see Him coming to
Earth in the clouds? After all, you claim it is
literal, so let's check and see if it is. You demand
proof that these events already happened, because we
haven't visually seen Jesus riding a cloud, coming to
Earth. Okay, so be it, but you call God a liar.
The following are PAST events and fulfilled prophecy...
"The burden of Egypt. Behold, the LORD rideth upon a
swift cloud, and shall come into Egypt: and the idols
of Egypt shall be moved at his presence, and the heart
of Egypt shall melt in the midst of it." - Isaiah 19:1
Did they see the Lord riding on a cloud?
Did the idols move?
Did the heart of Egypt literally melt?
How about this one, which is a Psalm of David, AFTER
God delivered him from his enemies?
Psalm 18:9,14
9) He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and
darkness was under his feet.
14) Yea, he sent out his arrows, and scattered them;
and he shot out lightnings, and discomfited them.
Did God literally "bow the heavens"?
Did God literally and visually "come down"?
Did He have "darkness under His feet"?
Did God literally "send out arrows"?
Did God literally "shoot out lightnings" to defeat
David's enemies?
Neither of these (and there are more) are literal
statements, yet you wish to take Matthew 24:30
literally. Why not then take those passages in the Old
Testament literally?
Now I do expect a response that deals with the texts
that I've quoted and the questions I've asked. As the
rules state, just quoting other passages does not do
the trick.

The rest of the chapter explains the signs of his
coming and the time of is coming, not the day or the hour but the
generation, if you like i could explain every verse.

The subject is Jerusalem and Judaea, not the world.

Chapter 16 has noting to do with end time prophecy,the subject is in
verse 21, how that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the
elders and chief priest and scribes, and be KILLED, and be raised again the
third day. verse 27 For the son of man shall come in the glory of his father
with his angels, thats Heaven. Most of the people he was talking to were
there when he was killed and went to his glory, Heaven, except Judah, as far
as i know he's the only one that was not there. God bless

You are trying to play dodge ball. It doesn't say that
it is about when He goes to Heaven. It says that He
will come, not that He will go. It His talking about
His return, not His departure.
Matthew 16:27-28
27) For the Son of man shall COME in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.
The Son of Man shall COME...
This speaks of His return.
Reward every man...
This is judgment. You cannot say that He will reward
every man according to his works and then claim that He
is not speaking about judging.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.
The Son of Man will come IN HIS KINGDOM BEFORE some of
the people STANDING THERE die. It's a very simple,
very clear statement.
And there is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.
User: "CDumont"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 12 Jan 2005 02:21:45 AM
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:fv06u0hj84rb2c74arbc77hhua2s6h53t9@4ax.com...

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:34:35 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:kq45u0duskhvj24nue4ip44h40bcoo6f93@4ax.com...

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:55:52 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rdk2u0po5s2meur8dlg9pcmm58ppjup0l8@4ax.com...

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:31:17 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of
the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God
bless


Actually, Jesus never said, "in the generation of the
fig tree".



I n verse 32 Jesus said, now learn the parable of the fig tree, have
you
learned it? thats the generation he was talking about in verse 34, If
you
want i'll teach it to you. God bless


I know what the popular idea is. Jesus however, did
not use the word "generation" there. Nor did He say,
"This is what I mean when I say, "this generation".
Reading through the chapter clearly shows that He was
speaking to those standing in front of Him. Jesus
simply used the example of a fig tree to demonstrate
what He was saying. If you disagree, then please
explain the following statement, in which Jesus says
that He will come in judgment and His kingdom, before
all of the Apostles died...

Matthew 16:27-28

27) For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.

There is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.


Pastor;
It is very important to follow the subject and the object in the
Scripturs, in chapter 24, the subject is end time prophecy,verse 3. tell
us
when shall these things be? and what shall be the signs of thy coming, and
of the end of the world.


Actually, you are mistaken. The Greek word there
means, "age", not world. The Greek word for the globe
of the Earth is "kosmos". The word here is, "aeon",
which means, "an age". They are asking when the end of
the age is, not the end of the planet.

It is not i that is mistaken, that is whats written in the Bible,
actually it's world age, did you know that we are now in the second world
age? do you know that we were all in the first world age?


It is clear that the Apostles thought that the end
would come in their lifetime and that Jesus gave them
this idea. You would be forced to claim that Jesus let
them think this, because He didn't want them to be lazy
about their faith. But wait a minute... it would
still be a lie for Jesus to make them think it was
going to happen in their lifetime and that they needed
to be on guard, if He was really talking about some
future generation in Matthew 24 (as people like you are
forced to claim) and not about the current generation.
Isn't a lie a lie? Do we worship a God that lies?
Heaven forbid! "Let God be true and every man a liar".
Why don't you apply that here? And what about when the
Bible says that "God is not a man, that He should lie"?
The fact is, that when speaking in Matthew 24, Jesus
discussed the Temple standing there in front of them
and if He wanted them to think of some other
generation, then He wouldn't have said, "YOU", but
rather, "THEY", when He spoke of the generation that
would see the things He discussed. That's just plain
common sense.

There are still many stones standing, when Jesus comes there will not be
one stone in Jerusalem, because thats where the millinum Temple will be
acording to Ezekiel.


I.e., get yourself out of the 21st century and read it
as if you were a first century Jew. This is the
problem. Atheists point at Christians and laugh,
because while they claim to be taking it literally,
they play word games with Mat 24:34 and the word,
"generation". It's a contradiction to claim it is a
literal chapter and then claim that "this generation"
doesn't mean exactly what it says. So either Jesus was
wrong, or, His words aren't all meant literally, which
is obvious to anyone who is familiar with the Old
Testament and its use of picture language, such as when
Ezekiel prophesied about Egypt, which was fulfilled in
the past and talked about the Sun and Moon going dark
and God riding on a cloud in judgment. Yet you would
ignore that, or try to talk around it, since they
didn't see God physically riding on a cloud. Why?
That is inconsistent and hypocritical. You would have
to try to claim that a fulfilled prophecy did not take
place yet, when any Bible student with half a brain
would know that it is a prophecy that was fulfilled a
long time ago.

You are trying to fit something where it just does'nt fit, verse 32 his
branch, thats the tribe of Judah, is yet tender and putteth forth leaves,
when it becomes a nation, that happened in 1948, ye know that summer is
near, summer is harvest time, the harvest of the souls, Jer. explains more
if your interested, this generation refers to what he had just said.


Do yourself a favor and try reading Matthew 24 again
and note the use of the word "YOU" and see if it makes
sense (especially in light of vs 1-2 & v34) to think
that it meant some future generation. Put aside your
problem with some of the passages for now, due to your
thinking He was being literal in all of them and just
read it to see if it makes sense to say "YOU", instead
of "THEY" in that chapter, if He is speaking of some
future generation. Once again, do not go back to the
"He didn't want them to be lazy about their faith
argument". That is covered above. The simple fact is,
that if I said to you that you should watch for
something, you would start watching. You wouldn't be
expecting some generation 2,000 years from now to be
the ones who should watch for it.

I say to you refers to the people he was talkin to and to the people who
read it today, note that he did not say, i say to you, your generation, if
he meant them he would have said your generation.


You would also know that I was talking about you, in
the sentence that I just typed, which said, "If I said
to YOU...". Do you see what I'm saying? Why do the
rules of common sense in language go out the window for
you, when it comes to the words of Jesus and the
Apostles? Did Jesus say that we should become blind to
common sense in understanding what the word "YOU"
means? Of course not.

When He told the Pharisees that they were hypocrites,
did He mean the Pharisees of the 21st century? Of
course not. And how many people, when studying the
text in Matthew 24 fail to note the following passages,
which come just before Matthew 24, which provide the
context for Matthew 24? Read these passages from
Matthew 23 and note the following...

1) Who is Jesus talking TO?

2) Who is Jesus talking ABOUT?

3) WHERE is He talking about?

4) WHERE WAS HE when He said these things (the answer
is in Mat 24:1)?

5) THEN read Matthew 24:2 & 34 and see what comes to
light.

I have added some caps to the text, to highlight
certain things. Please read it carefully and slowly.

Matthew 23:29-39

29) Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish
the sepulchres of the righteous,
30) And say, If WE had been in the days of OUR fathers,
we would not have been partakers with them in the blood
of the prophets.
31) Wherefore YE be witnesses unto YOURSELVES, that YE
are the children of them which killed the prophets.
32) Fill YE up then the measure of YOUR fathers.
33) YE serpents, YE GENERATION of vipers, how can YE
escape the damnation of hell?
34) Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and
wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill
and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your
synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:
35) That upon YOU may come all the righteous blood shed
upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto
the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom YE slew
between the temple and the altar.
36) Verily I say unto you, ALL THESE THINGS shall come
upon THIS GENERATION.
37) O JERUSALEM, JERUSALEM, THOU that killest the
prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto THEE,
how often would I have gathered THY children together,
even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings,
and YE WOULD NOT!
38) Behold, YOUR HOUSE is left unto you desolate.
39) For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth,
till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the
name of the Lord.

Answers to questions asked above.

1) The Scribes and Pharisees.

2) The generation present at the time He said it
(verses 31-33).

3) Jerusalem (v37).

4) In the Temple in Jerusalem (v38).

Note the fact that Jesus says He is talking about
Jerusalem and the use of "this generation". Also note
that Matthew 24:1 tells us that Jesus was in the Temple
when He said this. Thus, we know "house = temple".
Now go on and read the passages I noted previously
(Matthew 24:1-2 & 34) and see how it reads.

And of course, what happened? Read up on 70 A.D..

You may not think that those things didn't happen in 70
A.D., but they did. But hey, since you believe it to
be literal, let's try your belief out...

Chapter 23 has noting to do with chapter 24, the subject in Chapter 24 is
very clear in verse 3.
When shall these things be?
What shall be the signs of thy coming? and i already answered those.


Stars falling from heaven...

Matthew 24:29-30

29) Immediately after the tribulation of those days
shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give
her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and
the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30) And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in
heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth
mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the
clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

I think we can agree that v30 comes after v29. :)

I think we can also agree that Jesus is describing the
events in v30 as coming after v29, by the use of the
words, "And then...".

Now, the first thing to understand, is that a star
could not fall to Earth. A star is many times bigger
than the Earth and if anything, the Earth would get
sucked into its gravitational pull and not vice versa.
But assuming that it could happen and a star struck the
Earth, it would disintegrate the Earth (this would
actually happen before it even got close to the Earth).
In other words, the Earth would be gone, gone, gone.

Now that we have established basic scientific fact,
tell me, how will there be any tribes left on the
Earth, which wouldn't even be here, to mourn (v30)?
You need to explain that one to me, under your literal
approach to Matthew 24.

Verse 29 does come before verse 30, first the seven year tribulation of
the antichrist [satan] and the image of the beast [ the united nation, or
one world gov.] of course you know that the seven years was cut down to five
months for the sake of the elects. The stars are the angels, Jesus is coming
with his angels, you can read more about it in Rev. The sun shall be
darkened, it will look darker because of the brightness of Jesus.


And just so you know, I will not accept a response that
says it's meteorites.

1) You claim literalism in the text.

2) Jesus said "stars".

3) If He meant meteorites, he could have said, "burning
rocks", or something to that effect. He didn't, so it
is stars and NOT meteorites. That is simply an attempt
to get around the text that you claim is LITERAL.

You also forget what Jesus said...

"Verily I say unto you, THIS GENERATION shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34

Why don't you take that literally?

Let's look at a couple more verses from Matthew 24, in
light of the above...

Matthew 24:1-2,15-16,20

1) And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple:
and his disciples came to him for to show him the
buildings of the temple.
2) And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these
things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left
here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown
down.

Jesus is talking about the destruction of the temple
and the surrounding area. He pointed at a temple that
was standing. He said, "Do you see THESE THINGS?".

That destruction happened in 70 A.D.. But you think
that the Apostles should have skipped that one and
waited thousands of years for another temple?


15) When ye therefore shall see the abomination of
desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in
the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)
16) Then let them which be in Judea flee into the
mountains:

Let them IN JUDAEA flee to the mountains. Now why
would He specify Judaea and tell them to flee to the
mountains, if it was a global event and the stars were
going to fall to the Earth? What good would it do?


20) But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter,
neither on the sabbath day:

Pray ye that your flight be not in winter, because harvest is in summer,
if you are harvested in winter you are not ready. It actully won't help for
anybody to run anywhere, it's just a figure of speech. Now pay close
attention, when we see Jesus coming down with his angels we will not be in
our flesh body, we will all be phisicaly dead, we will be in our spiritual
body, and that will happen in the twinkling of an eye.1 Co.15:51-52. I know
that did not happen in 70 A.D.


Why would He tell them to pray that it wasn't on a
Sabbath day? Easy, because during the Sabbath, they
could only walk about 3/4 mile and that wouldn't be far
enough to avoid what was happening to Jerusalem.

But let's assume for a moment that it is speaking of
Him coming to Earth. Is it a literal statement, as in
a visual event for humans to visually see Him coming to
Earth in the clouds? After all, you claim it is
literal, so let's check and see if it is. You demand
proof that these events already happened, because we
haven't visually seen Jesus riding a cloud, coming to
Earth. Okay, so be it, but you call God a liar.

The following are PAST events and fulfilled prophecy...

"The burden of Egypt. Behold, the LORD rideth upon a
swift cloud, and shall come into Egypt: and the idols
of Egypt shall be moved at his presence, and the heart
of Egypt shall melt in the midst of it." - Isaiah 19:1

Did they see the Lord riding on a cloud?

Did the idols move?

Did the heart of Egypt literally melt?

How about this one, which is a Psalm of David, AFTER
God delivered him from his enemies?

Psalm 18:9,14

9) He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and
darkness was under his feet.
14) Yea, he sent out his arrows, and scattered them;
and he shot out lightnings, and discomfited them.

Did God literally "bow the heavens"?

Did God literally and visually "come down"?

Did He have "darkness under His feet"?

Did God literally "send out arrows"?

Did God literally "shoot out lightnings" to defeat
David's enemies?

Neither of these (and there are more) are literal
statements, yet you wish to take Matthew 24:30
literally. Why not then take those passages in the Old
Testament literally?

Now I do expect a response that deals with the texts
that I've quoted and the questions I've asked. As the
rules state, just quoting other passages does not do
the trick.


The rest of the chapter explains the signs of his
coming and the time of is coming, not the day or the hour but the
generation, if you like i could explain every verse.


The subject is Jerusalem and Judaea, not the world.

Subject in verse 3 and of the end of the WORLD.[ this world age]





Chapter 16 has noting to do with end time prophecy,the subject is in
verse 21, how that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the
elders and chief priest and scribes, and be KILLED, and be raised again
the
third day. verse 27 For the son of man shall come in the glory of his
father
with his angels, thats Heaven. Most of the people he was talking to were
there when he was killed and went to his glory, Heaven, except Judah, as
far
as i know he's the only one that was not there. God bless


You are trying to play dodge ball. It doesn't say that
it is about when He goes to Heaven. It says that He
will come, not that He will go. It His talking about
His return, not His departure.

Matthew 16:27-28

27) For the Son of man shall COME in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.

The Son of Man shall COME...

The Greek word is erchomai, and it means to come or to go, in this case
it's to go, because the glory of his father is not here it's in Heaven.


This speaks of His return.


Reward every man...

This is judgment. You cannot say that He will reward
every man according to his works and then claim that He
is not speaking about judging.

He is not talking about judgment, he is talking about his elect, they
were judged in the first world age, the second death has no power over them,
there names are written in the book of life, when he died the doors of
Heaven were open.



28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.

The Son of Man will come IN HIS KINGDOM BEFORE some of
the people STANDING THERE die. It's a very simple,
very clear statement.

And there is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.

If you need more help with your studies let me know. God bless

--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17

.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 12 Jan 2005 11:40:21 AM
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:21:45 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:

"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:fv06u0hj84rb2c74arbc77hhua2s6h53t9@4ax.com...

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:34:35 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:kq45u0duskhvj24nue4ip44h40bcoo6f93@4ax.com...

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:55:52 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rdk2u0po5s2meur8dlg9pcmm58ppjup0l8@4ax.com...

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:31:17 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of
the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God
bless


Actually, Jesus never said, "in the generation of the
fig tree".



I n verse 32 Jesus said, now learn the parable of the fig tree, have
you
learned it? thats the generation he was talking about in verse 34, If
you
want i'll teach it to you. God bless


I know what the popular idea is. Jesus however, did
not use the word "generation" there. Nor did He say,
"This is what I mean when I say, "this generation".
Reading through the chapter clearly shows that He was
speaking to those standing in front of Him. Jesus
simply used the example of a fig tree to demonstrate
what He was saying. If you disagree, then please
explain the following statement, in which Jesus says
that He will come in judgment and His kingdom, before
all of the Apostles died...

Matthew 16:27-28

27) For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.

There is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.


Pastor;
It is very important to follow the subject and the object in the
Scripturs, in chapter 24, the subject is end time prophecy,verse 3. tell
us
when shall these things be? and what shall be the signs of thy coming, and
of the end of the world.


Actually, you are mistaken. The Greek word there
means, "age", not world. The Greek word for the globe
of the Earth is "kosmos". The word here is, "aeon",
which means, "an age". They are asking when the end of
the age is, not the end of the planet.


It is not i that is mistaken, that is whats written in the Bible,
actually it's world age, did you know that we are now in the second world
age? do you know that we were all in the first world age?

You claimed the Bible said "world". It does not. The
word there means, "age". You were wrong.

It is clear that the Apostles thought that the end
would come in their lifetime and that Jesus gave them
this idea. You would be forced to claim that Jesus let
them think this, because He didn't want them to be lazy
about their faith. But wait a minute... it would
still be a lie for Jesus to make them think it was
going to happen in their lifetime and that they needed
to be on guard, if He was really talking about some
future generation in Matthew 24 (as people like you are
forced to claim) and not about the current generation.
Isn't a lie a lie? Do we worship a God that lies?
Heaven forbid! "Let God be true and every man a liar".
Why don't you apply that here? And what about when the
Bible says that "God is not a man, that He should lie"?
The fact is, that when speaking in Matthew 24, Jesus
discussed the Temple standing there in front of them
and if He wanted them to think of some other
generation, then He wouldn't have said, "YOU", but
rather, "THEY", when He spoke of the generation that
would see the things He discussed. That's just plain
common sense.


There are still many stones standing, when Jesus comes there will not be
one stone in Jerusalem, because thats where the millinum Temple will be
acording to Ezekiel.

He did not say all of Jerusalem would be torn down,
stone by stone. You are twisting His words. No stones
for the temple were left together and there is no third
temple. And Ezekiel prophesied about the 2nd temple.

I.e., get yourself out of the 21st century and read it
as if you were a first century Jew. This is the
problem. Atheists point at Christians and laugh,
because while they claim to be taking it literally,
they play word games with Mat 24:34 and the word,
"generation". It's a contradiction to claim it is a
literal chapter and then claim that "this generation"
doesn't mean exactly what it says. So either Jesus was
wrong, or, His words aren't all meant literally, which
is obvious to anyone who is familiar with the Old
Testament and its use of picture language, such as when
Ezekiel prophesied about Egypt, which was fulfilled in
the past and talked about the Sun and Moon going dark
and God riding on a cloud in judgment. Yet you would
ignore that, or try to talk around it, since they
didn't see God physically riding on a cloud. Why?
That is inconsistent and hypocritical. You would have
to try to claim that a fulfilled prophecy did not take
place yet, when any Bible student with half a brain
would know that it is a prophecy that was fulfilled a
long time ago.


You are trying to fit something where it just does'nt fit, verse 32 his
branch, thats the tribe of Judah, is yet tender and putteth forth leaves,
when it becomes a nation, that happened in 1948, ye know that summer is
near, summer is harvest time, the harvest of the souls, Jer. explains more
if your interested, this generation refers to what he had just said.

You are claiming it doesn't fit. What doesn't fit, is
your doctrine. Show me where Jesus said that this fig
tree equals Israel. Show me where Jesus said that this
fig tree equals Israel becoming a nation again. The
fact is, He didn't and you are ignoring what I'm saying
and you keep spitting out the same garbage, without any
Scriptural support. I support my statements with
Scripture. You do not.

Do yourself a favor and try reading Matthew 24 again
and note the use of the word "YOU" and see if it makes
sense (especially in light of vs 1-2 & v34) to think
that it meant some future generation. Put aside your
problem with some of the passages for now, due to your
thinking He was being literal in all of them and just
read it to see if it makes sense to say "YOU", instead
of "THEY" in that chapter, if He is speaking of some
future generation. Once again, do not go back to the
"He didn't want them to be lazy about their faith
argument". That is covered above. The simple fact is,
that if I said to you that you should watch for
something, you would start watching. You wouldn't be
expecting some generation 2,000 years from now to be
the ones who should watch for it.


I say to you refers to the people he was talkin to and to the people who
read it today, note that he did not say, i say to you, your generation, if
he meant them he would have said your generation.

He DID say that! That's my point! He specifically
said, "THIS GENERATION". You want me to believe that
He is talking to them and to us. Was this supposed to
happen twice?! Once again, you give ZERO Scriptural
support for your belief.

You would also know that I was talking about you, in
the sentence that I just typed, which said, "If I said
to YOU...". Do you see what I'm saying? Why do the
rules of common sense in language go out the window for
you, when it comes to the words of Jesus and the
Apostles? Did Jesus say that we should become blind to
common sense in understanding what the word "YOU"
means? Of course not.

When He told the Pharisees that they were hypocrites,
did He mean the Pharisees of the 21st century? Of
course not. And how many people, when studying the
text in Matthew 24 fail to note the following passages,
which come just before Matthew 24, which provide the
context for Matthew 24? Read these passages from
Matthew 23 and note the following...

1) Who is Jesus talking TO?

2) Who is Jesus talking ABOUT?

3) WHERE is He talking about?

4) WHERE WAS HE when He said these things (the answer
is in Mat 24:1)?

5) THEN read Matthew 24:2 & 34 and see what comes to
light.

I have added some caps to the text, to highlight
certain things. Please read it carefully and slowly.

Matthew 23:29-39

29) Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!
because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish
the sepulchres of the righteous,
30) And say, If WE had been in the days of OUR fathers,
we would not have been partakers with them in the blood
of the prophets.
31) Wherefore YE be witnesses unto YOURSELVES, that YE
are the children of them which killed the prophets.
32) Fill YE up then the measure of YOUR fathers.
33) YE serpents, YE GENERATION of vipers, how can YE
escape the damnation of hell?
34) Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and
wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill
and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your
synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:
35) That upon YOU may come all the righteous blood shed
upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto
the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom YE slew
between the temple and the altar.
36) Verily I say unto you, ALL THESE THINGS shall come
upon THIS GENERATION.
37) O JERUSALEM, JERUSALEM, THOU that killest the
prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto THEE,
how often would I have gathered THY children together,
even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings,
and YE WOULD NOT!
38) Behold, YOUR HOUSE is left unto you desolate.
39) For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth,
till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the
name of the Lord.

Answers to questions asked above.

1) The Scribes and Pharisees.

2) The generation present at the time He said it
(verses 31-33).

3) Jerusalem (v37).

4) In the Temple in Jerusalem (v38).

Note the fact that Jesus says He is talking about
Jerusalem and the use of "this generation". Also note
that Matthew 24:1 tells us that Jesus was in the Temple
when He said this. Thus, we know "house = temple".
Now go on and read the passages I noted previously
(Matthew 24:1-2 & 34) and see how it reads.

And of course, what happened? Read up on 70 A.D..

You may not think that those things didn't happen in 70
A.D., but they did. But hey, since you believe it to
be literal, let's try your belief out...


Chapter 23 has noting to do with chapter 24,

Now you're really off your rocker :) Why don't you try
studying it for yourself and stop reading books that
tell you what to believe?
Fact: Jesus blasted the Pharisees IN THE TEMPLE.
Fact: Jesus walked out of the temple.
Fact: His disciples then came and asked Him the
questions, while they were in a place that overlooked
the temple and Jesus said, "Do you see all these
things?".

the subject in Chapter 24 is
very clear in verse 3.
When shall these things be?
What shall be the signs of thy coming? and i already answered those.

You answered them incorrectly. You claimed it
discussed the end of the world and you were wrong. It
discussed the end of the age. Then you tried (earlier
in this message) to act as if you were talking about an
age all along. You weren't. That is dishonest of you.

Stars falling from heaven...

Matthew 24:29-30

29) Immediately after the tribulation of those days
shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give
her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and
the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30) And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in
heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth
mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the
clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

I think we can agree that v30 comes after v29. :)

I think we can also agree that Jesus is describing the
events in v30 as coming after v29, by the use of the
words, "And then...".

Now, the first thing to understand, is that a star
could not fall to Earth. A star is many times bigger
than the Earth and if anything, the Earth would get
sucked into its gravitational pull and not vice versa.
But assuming that it could happen and a star struck the
Earth, it would disintegrate the Earth (this would
actually happen before it even got close to the Earth).
In other words, the Earth would be gone, gone, gone.

Now that we have established basic scientific fact,
tell me, how will there be any tribes left on the
Earth, which wouldn't even be here, to mourn (v30)?
You need to explain that one to me, under your literal
approach to Matthew 24.


Verse 29 does come before verse 30, first the seven year tribulation of
the antichrist [satan] and the image of the beast [ the united nation, or
one world gov.] of course you know that the seven years was cut down to five
months for the sake of the elects. The stars are the angels, Jesus is coming
with his angels, you can read more about it in Rev. The sun shall be
darkened, it will look darker because of the brightness of Jesus.

Now you've gone on to your speech again, without
addressing the points I made. Once again, that is
dishonest of you.

And just so you know, I will not accept a response that
says it's meteorites.

1) You claim literalism in the text.

2) Jesus said "stars".

3) If He meant meteorites, he could have said, "burning
rocks", or something to that effect. He didn't, so it
is stars and NOT meteorites. That is simply an attempt
to get around the text that you claim is LITERAL.

You also forget what Jesus said...

"Verily I say unto you, THIS GENERATION shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34

Why don't you take that literally?

Let's look at a couple more verses from Matthew 24, in
light of the above...

Matthew 24:1-2,15-16,20

1) And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple:
and his disciples came to him for to show him the
buildings of the temple.
2) And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these
things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left
here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown
down.

Jesus is talking about the destruction of the temple
and the surrounding area. He pointed at a temple that
was standing. He said, "Do you see THESE THINGS?".

That destruction happened in 70 A.D.. But you think
that the Apostles should have skipped that one and
waited thousands of years for another temple?


15) When ye therefore shall see the abomination of
desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in
the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)
16) Then let them which be in Judea flee into the
mountains:

Let them IN JUDAEA flee to the mountains. Now why
would He specify Judaea and tell them to flee to the
mountains, if it was a global event and the stars were
going to fall to the Earth? What good would it do?


20) But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter,
neither on the sabbath day:


Pray ye that your flight be not in winter, because harvest is in summer,
if you are harvested in winter you are not ready. It actully won't help for
anybody to run anywhere, it's just a figure of speech. Now pay close
attention, when we see Jesus coming down with his angels we will not be in
our flesh body, we will all be phisicaly dead, we will be in our spiritual
body, and that will happen in the twinkling of an eye.1 Co.15:51-52. I know
that did not happen in 70 A.D.

Oh, I see. It's a figure of speech, but the rest is
literal, right? You completely ignore what I'm saying
and then give me this speech that cannot be backed up
in Scripture. And as for the "twinkling of an eye",
yes, it did happen, but I won't bother telling you
about it, because all you'll do is ignore what I said
and then give me some speech.
The fact is, you take that literally, but then whatever
doesn't make sense, you call a figure of speech,
without provide Scriptural support for calling it one.

Why would He tell them to pray that it wasn't on a
Sabbath day? Easy, because during the Sabbath, they
could only walk about 3/4 mile and that wouldn't be far
enough to avoid what was happening to Jerusalem.

But let's assume for a moment that it is speaking of
Him coming to Earth. Is it a literal statement, as in
a visual event for humans to visually see Him coming to
Earth in the clouds? After all, you claim it is
literal, so let's check and see if it is. You demand
proof that these events already happened, because we
haven't visually seen Jesus riding a cloud, coming to
Earth. Okay, so be it, but you call God a liar.

The following are PAST events and fulfilled prophecy...

"The burden of Egypt. Behold, the LORD rideth upon a
swift cloud, and shall come into Egypt: and the idols
of Egypt shall be moved at his presence, and the heart
of Egypt shall melt in the midst of it." - Isaiah 19:1

Did they see the Lord riding on a cloud?

Did the idols move?

Did the heart of Egypt literally melt?

How about this one, which is a Psalm of David, AFTER
God delivered him from his enemies?

Psalm 18:9,14

9) He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and
darkness was under his feet.
14) Yea, he sent out his arrows, and scattered them;
and he shot out lightnings, and discomfited them.

Did God literally "bow the heavens"?

Did God literally and visually "come down"?

Did He have "darkness under His feet"?

Did God literally "send out arrows"?

Did God literally "shoot out lightnings" to defeat
David's enemies?

Neither of these (and there are more) are literal
statements, yet you wish to take Matthew 24:30
literally. Why not then take those passages in the Old
Testament literally?

Now I do expect a response that deals with the texts
that I've quoted and the questions I've asked. As the
rules state, just quoting other passages does not do
the trick.


The rest of the chapter explains the signs of his
coming and the time of is coming, not the day or the hour but the
generation, if you like i could explain every verse.


The subject is Jerusalem and Judaea, not the world.

Subject in verse 3 and of the end of the WORLD.[ this world age]





Chapter 16 has noting to do with end time prophecy,the subject is in
verse 21, how that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the
elders and chief priest and scribes, and be KILLED, and be raised again
the
third day. verse 27 For the son of man shall come in the glory of his
father
with his angels, thats Heaven. Most of the people he was talking to were
there when he was killed and went to his glory, Heaven, except Judah, as
far
as i know he's the only one that was not there. God bless


You are trying to play dodge ball. It doesn't say that
it is about when He goes to Heaven. It says that He
will come, not that He will go. It His talking about
His return, not His departure.

Matthew 16:27-28

27) For the Son of man shall COME in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.

The Son of Man shall COME...

The Greek word is erchomai, and it means to come or to go, in this case
it's to go, because the glory of his father is not here it's in Heaven.


This speaks of His return.


Reward every man...

This is judgment. You cannot say that He will reward
every man according to his works and then claim that He
is not speaking about judging.


He is not talking about judgment, he is talking about his elect, they
were judged in the first world age, the second death has no power over them,
there names are written in the book of life, when he died the doors of
Heaven were open.

You aren't making any sense here.

28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.

The Son of Man will come IN HIS KINGDOM BEFORE some of
the people STANDING THERE die. It's a very simple,
very clear statement.

And there is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.


If you need more help with your studies let me know. God bless

You pretend to be able to teach me, but cannot
demonstrate one thing you've said as being Scriptural.
--
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
.


User: "Mark T"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 10 Jan 2005 04:59:27 PM
Famous Predictions of Jesus' Return - Pat Robertson, Hal Lindsey, Benny Hinn
etc
1981 CE - In his 1978 book, "Future Survival", Pastor Chuck Smith of the
Calvary Chapel chainchurches, serving fast-faith throughout Southern CA,
made a prediction for a 1981 Welcome Home, Jesus party. He would later come
to regret that. Still, like many others who seem to have so little else to
look forward to, Chuck continues to blab tediously on about the Second
Coming at every possible opportunity. He just steers clear of pin-pointing
any precise due dates, nowadays.
December 31, 1981 CE - Speaking of tedious, best-selling paranoia peddler
Hal Lindsey declared in his book, "The Late, Great Planet Earth" that the
Rapture would be forthcoming no later than 1981. Like many other neurotic
doom junkies of the day, Hal was stuck on the year 1948 as the moment the
apocalypse clock got ticking. Since the End would have to come within a
generation of that date and pop-wisdom said a generation was forty years, it
would have to be scheduled for 1988. Now, since there would first need to be
seven years of Trib time, and before any nasty Tribulation stuff could go
down, all the good little Christians would have to go up, that clearly put
the Great Up-Sucking at 1981.
There was nothing new to Hal's message, at all. What he had to say
amounted to little more than a regurgitation of the cataclysmic claptrap
that hundreds of other doomsmiths had been shopping around for years. But,
he did have a knack for spiffy packaging. Lindsey used a technique now
common in the biz. He methodically re-attributed all sorts of Bible passages
to 20th century references; pegging Armageddon as a world-wide nuclear
holocaust and re-casting a menagerie of Bible beasties as modern military
machinery. Adopting a style that was popularly slangy on the one hand and
dependent on twisted uses of political, scientific and military jargon on
the other, Lindsey was able to convey to his readers a sense of immediacy
and relevance to their lives that others in his field had yet to achieve.
His use of buzz-words and selectively misleading technical data gave his
bizarre conclusions the patina of "scientific" validity. He also had the
great fortune to have his scare-tract made into a B-movie narrated by Orson
Welles (whose career, by then, had dwindled down to that and hawking cheap
wine on TV) and it managed to reach an even wider audience of the
chronically gullible.
If there was anything at all unique to his 1981 harpings, it was his
reliance on the claims made in another book, "The Jupiter Effect". Lindsey's
style was to describe in loving, lingering, near-orgasmic detail all the
appalling, gory, blood-drenched disasters that would occur due to this
singular astral alignment. Then he'd justify it all by pointing to this one
"scientific" text. A practice he continued in his later book, "The 1980's:
Countdown to Armageddon", even though the authors of "The Jupiter Effect"
had publicly refuted their earlier findings. The failure of Lindsey's
predictions to come anywhere near the neighborhood of true has never slowed
him down in the least. He just dropped all reference to the Jupiter Effect,
now refers to a generation as being anywhere between 40 and 100 years and
keeps on making the same tired claims over and over, repositioning the
target date as needed.
.....
1982 CE - In case you were beginning to ask yourself, "Hey, where's that
reliable ol' zipperhead, Pat Robertson in all this?" fear not! No discussion
of fanatical apocalypse pushers could possibly be complete without a mention
of Patty's rantings. Usually good for an amusing screed or two regarding
more localized catastrophes, like his claims that he could move killer
hurricanes with his mind, Pat "Talk Louder, I Can't Hear You Over The Voices
In My Head" Robertson once pegged 1982 as the big date. The Soviet Union, he
declared, would invade Israel and touch off the nuclear Armageddon that
would spell the end of everything. No less than two billion people were to
die in screaming, radioactive agony according to Patty's glorious
imaginings. When this charming scenario failed to materialize, Pat just
turned his attention toward other disasters, like AIDs, earthquakes, fires,
floods and his 1988 presidential campaign.
1982 CE - Hal Lindsey wasn't the only one to get his panties in a bunch over
the Jupiter Effect. When the book came out in 1974, it became an instant hit
with twirling credophiles everywhere. The fact that the tome was authored by
two otherwise respectable astrophysicists, John Gribben and Stephen
Plagemann, lent the inane postulations within an entirely misplaced air of
legitimacy. It carried a kind of scientific caché that Luddites always
openly disdain, yet secretly yearn for and try to back their nutty claims up
with whenever even remotely possible.
The whole idea behind the Jupiter Effect, was that in 1982, nine whole
planets in our solar system (including Jupiter, natch') were to align their
bad selves in a trés impressive heliocentric conjunction. Their combined
gravitational pull would cause a huge increase in sunspots which would send
deadly solar-type particles whomping into our atmosphere in an entirely
uncouth fashion. This would muss up our planet's rotation no end and make
the tectonic plates very unhappy, causing killer earthquakes of like, two
billion zillion kadillion point six on the Richter scale to jiggle
world-wide.
What nobody, especially not the likes of Hal Lindsey, bothered to point
out, was that the book was never intended to be more than just an exercise
in astrophysical mental masturbation. A theoretical "what if" festival,
without much of any real substance behind it. As it became obvious that the
text was being misinterpreted and wildly abused by the paranoid set, Gribbin
publicly refuted the book's conclusions and re-emphasized its entirely
speculative nature. Didn't matter. Refuting the news of an oncoming disaster
is never as popular as concocting the news of one. Even when '82 rolled over
into '83 with nary an atmospheric or tectonic bobble of any note,
Jupiter-jumping True Believers did mental contortions for ages afterward,
trying to give their beloved astral apocalypse something to show for itself.
.....
1985 CE - Pentecostal preacher Lester Sumrall wrote of his unshakable
certainty in the end of the world in a little tome entitled, "I Predict
1985". By 1986, he'd published a new book entitled, "I Predict 2000".
.......
September 9, 1991 CE - Well, talk about your karmic ironies; Louis Farrakhan
was not the only one to find apocalyptic inspiration in the Gulf War, the
ultra-conservative Jewish sect, the Hasidim were, as well! Through a
circuitous form of logic that only life-long marinating in mystic dogma can
give rise to, Hasidic scholars concluded that a Russian-born rabbi named
Menachem Mendel Schneerson was a prime candidate for Messiahood. Schneerson,
himself was certainly with them that the apropos signs were on hand, right
down to the Midrashic prophecy for a war in the Arabian gulf. Well, hopes
ran high for a while, especially as Rosh Hashana closed in. But, as was the
case with Louis, Menny and his boys were doomed to disappointment. Menny in
particular, was doomed to more than that, as he died only three years later,
effectively putting the Hasids on Messiah Watch, all over again.
.....
1993 CE - Benny Hinn, bizarro televangelist so far out of orbit you couldn't
pull him back in with a tractor beam, prophesied that '93 would be the year
the faithful would be Raptured up like dust bunnies in a handy-vac. He also
prophesied, in his inimitable, loving Christian way that two years after
that, God would destroy all those sinful, evil awful, vile, icky
homosexuals...Mm hmn, me thinks the lady doth protest too much.
....
October 1997 CE - The Reverend Kenneth Hagin, whose ministries even include
a Bible correspondence school, determined that, not only was the End
a'comin', it was coming first to St. Louis, MO. From there, it was
apparently supposed to spread out like a big carpet stain across the USA.
....
October 23, 1997 CE - Hi, kiddies! It's time for another exciting episode in
our continuing "ADVENTURES IN BIBLE MATH"! When we last left our intrepid
Creation Pseudo-Scientists they had only just learned that a single day in
the life of God lasts one thousand years in the lives of humans!!! Which
explains why whenever there's a real sudden and unexpected disaster and
thousands of people pray to God for rescue, they'll all just die, anyway.
But six months later, their favorite team will win the Superbowl! It's a
time-delay thing. Anyway, God, we discovered, is big on the concept of fair
division of labor and since he had to slog through a six thousand year work
week, he figures we should too. Now, when one combines that thought with the
long-dead Bishop Ussher's notion that the world was created on Oct. 23, 4004
BCE (or just BC for the Bish) the result, obviously, is that Oct. 23, 1997
would mark the start of our day off. Sounds nice, huh?! Well,...except for
the small detail that the world was supposed to end at exactly the same
moment. But, what the hey, as long as we can sleep in, right?
.....
1999 CE - Jack Van Impe, who likes to append his name with the dubious
descriptor of "The Walking Bible", has been carrot-on-a-sticking his legions
of chiliasm chasers for decades. With promises ranging from Jesus' Happy
Returns party in 1975 to the hoisting of the Soviet flag over Independence
Hall by 1976, (I guess I just must have missed that moment between the
Bicentennial parades and the 500 Elvis impersonators at the Presidential
gala that year) Jack-o has made himself one very rich little
Parousia-peddler.
Back in 1990, the Impe-Man began hawking a video with the catchy title of
"A.D. 2000...The End?" in which he plotted out a '92 Rapture capture with a
'99 Doomsday. (as a point of interest, the vid was a big seller amongst
those Hyoo-go folks I spoke of earlier) In the tape, he went to great
lengths to suggest such joyful predictions as WW III and kept harping on the
notion that the faithful must spiritually prepare themselves for this
inevitable disaster ...with the strong intimation that they might not get
that prepping quite right without his heartfelt help...Available for a mere
$24.95, plus shipping.
....
2000 CE - In Hal Lindsey's literary doom-wallow, "Planet Earth - 2000", he
pegged the big 2-triple-0 as the target date for the battle of Armageddon...
Though, since that pooped out per all his earlier pip-squealings, he has
contingency dates going all the way up to 2048. At which point, barring
cryogenic freezing or personal resurrection, he should be safely dead and
impervious to the gales of skeptical laughter that will follow.
......
2000 CE - Just because a person is an expert in one field, doesn't mean
they're
a perfect font of wisdom about everything else. Case in point, Sir Isaac
Newton, who really should have stuck to math and physics and left prophetic
punditry alone. But, being an inquisitive kind'a guy, (and possessing an ego
large enough to generate its own gravitational field) he wasn't about to
tolerate limiting his intellect solely to useful pursuits. In a book
entitled, "Observations Upon The Prophecies Of Daniel And The Apocalypse Of
St. John" he squandered a truly depressing amount of time and energy working
out the details for the End Times. Page after page of nonsense abounds on
"the seventy weeks of Daniel" representing 490 years and where, what and
when all that began and ended and yadda, yadda, yadda... All of which
amounts to nothing, but which modern Doomwacks (particularly those of the
Biblical literalist variety) adored to harp on as "scientific" proof of
their nuttiest notions. It's enough to make one wonder if it wasn't an
apple, but an anvil that fell on Izzy's head that day.
2000 CE - A bit further up the timescale, eighteenth century Protestant
minister Jonahan Edwards tabbed the year 2000 for his big millennial event.
Of course, he also had 1866 marked down for the fall of the papacy. A tidy
reminder that prophets tend to see what they wish for.
....
from http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Oracle/9941/succeed_fail1.html
.



User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim?"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 10 Jan 2005 07:32:47 PM
I just want to know when god the jerk will STOP MURDERING PEOPLE.
DEATH TO GOD THE MURDERER.
GOD, THE WORST SERIAL KILLER OF ALL TIME
"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:kq45u0duskhvj24nue4ip44h40bcoo6f93@4ax.com...

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:55:52 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


"Pastor Dave" <newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rdk2u0po5s2meur8dlg9pcmm58ppjup0l8@4ax.com...

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:31:17 GMT, while scaling the Mt.
Everest, "CDumont" <cdumont@telusplanet.net>
pontificated:


According to the Scriptures Jesus will return within the generation of
the
fig tree, which started in 1948 and will end in 2018. Matt.24:34. God
bless


Actually, Jesus never said, "in the generation of the
fig tree".


--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17


I n verse 32 Jesus said, now learn the parable of the fig tree, have you
learned it? thats the generation he was talking about in verse 34, If you
want i'll teach it to you. God bless


I know what the popular idea is. Jesus however, did
not use the word "generation" there. Nor did He say,
"This is what I mean when I say, "this generation".
Reading through the chapter clearly shows that He was
speaking to those standing in front of Him. Jesus
simply used the example of a fig tree to demonstrate
what He was saying. If you disagree, then please
explain the following statement, in which Jesus says
that He will come in judgment and His kingdom, before
all of the Apostles died...

Matthew 16:27-28

27) For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his
Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every
man according to his works.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE,
which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son
of man coming in his kingdom.

There is no word "generation" to play with in those
passages.


--

Pastor Dave Raymond

"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditation." - Psalm 119:99

/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\

"And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17

.





User: "Mark T"

Title: Re: Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)(ed)? 08 Jan 2005 07:41:41 PM
"Pastor Dave" wrote:

Anybody want to talk about when Jesus return(s)?

Which direction will he come from?
At what speed?
Can we track him by satellite?
How can he breathe in outer space when t