| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Jd" |
| Date: |
23 May 2007 07:47:23 PM |
| Object: |
Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out forest fires so it ‘can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood’. The beetles have been shown to detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have special organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is converted to heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never before been described in any living
thing."
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i1/focus.asp
Jd
Psalms 19:1 "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handiwork."
.
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
24 May 2007 07:22:38 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:htu953tcio5pp2er2kasfmtkdqaska8rdi@4ax.com...
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out forest
fires so it 'can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood'. The beetles have been shown to
detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have special
organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is converted to
heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never before
been described in any living
thing."
Idiot.
"Melanophila acuminata beetles have what scientists call pit organs in their
chests right at the point where the legs are attached to the body. Within
each pit are 60 to 70 sensors called sensilla in insects. Each sensillum
consists of a little sphere which is made of the same hard skin material
that covers the beetle's outer shell. Each sphere is connected by nerves to
a highly-sensitive mechanoreceptive sensory cell."
"Incoming infrared radiation is absorbed by the outer sphere and absorption
causes the sphere to expand a little bit," said Schmitz. "This
micromechanical event is measured by the mechanoreceptor and a neuronal
signal is generated."
"Scientists have calculated that the European jewel beetle Melanophila
acuminata, about 1 cm. in length, can detect a 25-acre (10 hectares) forest
fire from 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) away."
"Note: Melanophila acuminata beetles are not the only animals equipped with
biological receptors capable of detecting infrared sources at even great
distances. Scientists are also studying how blood-sucking insects such as
mosquitoes detect warm-blooded animals as well as how IR-sensitive snakes
find their prey."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0314_030314_secretweapons3_2.html
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
24 May 2007 09:54:38 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:htu953tcio5pp2er2kasfmtkdqaska8rdi@4ax.com...
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out forest
fires so it 'can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood'. The beetles have been shown to
detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have special
organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is converted to
heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never before
been described in any living
thing."
Idiot.
"Melanophila acuminata beetles have what scientists call pit organs in their
chests right at the point where the legs are attached to the body. Within
each pit are 60 to 70 sensors called sensilla in insects. Each sensillum
consists of a little sphere which is made of the same hard skin material
that covers the beetle's outer shell. Each sphere is connected by nerves to
a highly-sensitive mechanoreceptive sensory cell."
"Incoming infrared radiation is absorbed by the outer sphere and absorption
causes the sphere to expand a little bit," said Schmitz. "This
micromechanical event is measured by the mechanoreceptor and a neuronal
signal is generated."
"Scientists have calculated that the European jewel beetle Melanophila
acuminata, about 1 cm. in length, can detect a 25-acre (10 hectares) forest
fire from 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) away."
"Note: Melanophila acuminata beetles are not the only animals equipped with
biological receptors capable of detecting infrared sources at even great
distances. Scientists are also studying how blood-sucking insects such as
mosquitoes detect warm-blooded animals as well as how IR-sensitive snakes
find their prey."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0314_030314_secretweapons3_2.html
James Powell
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are smarter than my scientists?
You have got to be one of the most arrogant assholes I've ever seen (except for Bob) if you think
for one moment that I'll let you get away with that.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
25 May 2007 05:26:31 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:iqpc535pr7e4qkoi9ir0c5mmuh9uaarp8d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:htu953tcio5pp2er2kasfmtkdqaska8rdi@4ax.com...
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out forest
fires so it 'can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood'. The beetles have been shown to
detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have
special
organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is converted to
heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never before
been described in any living
thing."
Idiot.
"Melanophila acuminata beetles have what scientists call pit organs in
their
chests right at the point where the legs are attached to the body. Within
each pit are 60 to 70 sensors called sensilla in insects. Each sensillum
consists of a little sphere which is made of the same hard skin material
that covers the beetle's outer shell. Each sphere is connected by nerves
to
a highly-sensitive mechanoreceptive sensory cell."
"Incoming infrared radiation is absorbed by the outer sphere and
absorption
causes the sphere to expand a little bit," said Schmitz. "This
micromechanical event is measured by the mechanoreceptor and a neuronal
signal is generated."
"Scientists have calculated that the European jewel beetle Melanophila
acuminata, about 1 cm. in length, can detect a 25-acre (10 hectares)
forest
fire from 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) away."
"Note: Melanophila acuminata beetles are not the only animals equipped
with
biological receptors capable of detecting infrared sources at even great
distances. Scientists are also studying how blood-sucking insects such as
mosquitoes detect warm-blooded animals as well as how IR-sensitive snakes
find their prey."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0314_030314_secretweapons3_2.html
James Powell
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have got to be one of the most arrogant assholes I've ever seen
(except for Bob) if you think
for one moment that I'll let you get away with that.
Jd
Moron.
No, I am stating that my source (National Geographic) is more reputable than
yours (Answers in Genesis) and therefore is more likely to have accurate
information.
Care to find a reputable source that does not link back to AIG that can
support any of your claims? Care to prove that any 'scientists' were even
properly quoted in AIG?
I found the easiest of sites for you to understand for mine. however, if you
care to Google, you will find the consensus agrees with what I posted.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
29 May 2007 06:44:58 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:iqpc535pr7e4qkoi9ir0c5mmuh9uaarp8d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:htu953tcio5pp2er2kasfmtkdqaska8rdi@4ax.com...
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out forest
fires so it 'can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood'. The beetles have been shown to
detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have
special
organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is converted to
heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never before
been described in any living
thing."
Idiot.
"Melanophila acuminata beetles have what scientists call pit organs in
their
chests right at the point where the legs are attached to the body. Within
each pit are 60 to 70 sensors called sensilla in insects. Each sensillum
consists of a little sphere which is made of the same hard skin material
that covers the beetle's outer shell. Each sphere is connected by nerves
to
a highly-sensitive mechanoreceptive sensory cell."
"Incoming infrared radiation is absorbed by the outer sphere and
absorption
causes the sphere to expand a little bit," said Schmitz. "This
micromechanical event is measured by the mechanoreceptor and a neuronal
signal is generated."
"Scientists have calculated that the European jewel beetle Melanophila
acuminata, about 1 cm. in length, can detect a 25-acre (10 hectares)
forest
fire from 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) away."
"Note: Melanophila acuminata beetles are not the only animals equipped
with
biological receptors capable of detecting infrared sources at even great
distances. Scientists are also studying how blood-sucking insects such as
mosquitoes detect warm-blooded animals as well as how IR-sensitive snakes
find their prey."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0314_030314_secretweapons3_2.html
James Powell
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have got to be one of the most arrogant assholes I've ever seen
(except for Bob) if you think
for one moment that I'll let you get away with that.
Jd
Moron.
No, I am stating that my source (National Geographic) is more reputable than
yours (Answers in Genesis) and therefore is more likely to have accurate
information.
Care to find a reputable source that does not link back to AIG that can
support any of your claims? Care to prove that any 'scientists' were even
properly quoted in AIG?
I found the easiest of sites for you to understand for mine. however, if you
care to Google, you will find the consensus agrees with what I posted.
James Powell
No. I care nothing whatsoever about proving things to your satisfaction.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
03 Jun 2007 07:49:08 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:5tlp53l4bpghg33cc2eoojnkqs6vlp617r@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:iqpc535pr7e4qkoi9ir0c5mmuh9uaarp8d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:htu953tcio5pp2er2kasfmtkdqaska8rdi@4ax.com...
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out
forest
fires so it 'can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood'. The beetles have been shown
to
detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have
special
organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is converted
to
heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never before
been described in any living
thing."
Idiot.
"Melanophila acuminata beetles have what scientists call pit organs in
their
chests right at the point where the legs are attached to the body.
Within
each pit are 60 to 70 sensors called sensilla in insects. Each sensillum
consists of a little sphere which is made of the same hard skin material
that covers the beetle's outer shell. Each sphere is connected by nerves
to
a highly-sensitive mechanoreceptive sensory cell."
"Incoming infrared radiation is absorbed by the outer sphere and
absorption
causes the sphere to expand a little bit," said Schmitz. "This
micromechanical event is measured by the mechanoreceptor and a neuronal
signal is generated."
"Scientists have calculated that the European jewel beetle Melanophila
acuminata, about 1 cm. in length, can detect a 25-acre (10 hectares)
forest
fire from 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) away."
"Note: Melanophila acuminata beetles are not the only animals equipped
with
biological receptors capable of detecting infrared sources at even great
distances. Scientists are also studying how blood-sucking insects such
as
mosquitoes detect warm-blooded animals as well as how IR-sensitive
snakes
find their prey."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0314_030314_secretweapons3_2.html
James Powell
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have got to be one of the most arrogant assholes I've ever seen
(except for Bob) if you think
for one moment that I'll let you get away with that.
Jd
Moron.
No, I am stating that my source (National Geographic) is more reputable
than
yours (Answers in Genesis) and therefore is more likely to have accurate
information.
Care to find a reputable source that does not link back to AIG that can
support any of your claims? Care to prove that any 'scientists' were even
properly quoted in AIG?
I found the easiest of sites for you to understand for mine. however, if
you
care to Google, you will find the consensus agrees with what I posted.
James Powell
No. I care nothing whatsoever about proving things to your satisfaction.
Jd
So you admit you have no interest in the facts, only in posting your own
fantasies.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
07 Jun 2007 05:19:24 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:5tlp53l4bpghg33cc2eoojnkqs6vlp617r@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:iqpc535pr7e4qkoi9ir0c5mmuh9uaarp8d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:htu953tcio5pp2er2kasfmtkdqaska8rdi@4ax.com...
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out
forest
fires so it 'can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood'. The beetles have been shown
to
detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have
special
organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is converted
to
heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never before
been described in any living
thing."
Idiot.
"Melanophila acuminata beetles have what scientists call pit organs in
their
chests right at the point where the legs are attached to the body.
Within
each pit are 60 to 70 sensors called sensilla in insects. Each sensillum
consists of a little sphere which is made of the same hard skin material
that covers the beetle's outer shell. Each sphere is connected by nerves
to
a highly-sensitive mechanoreceptive sensory cell."
"Incoming infrared radiation is absorbed by the outer sphere and
absorption
causes the sphere to expand a little bit," said Schmitz. "This
micromechanical event is measured by the mechanoreceptor and a neuronal
signal is generated."
"Scientists have calculated that the European jewel beetle Melanophila
acuminata, about 1 cm. in length, can detect a 25-acre (10 hectares)
forest
fire from 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) away."
"Note: Melanophila acuminata beetles are not the only animals equipped
with
biological receptors capable of detecting infrared sources at even great
distances. Scientists are also studying how blood-sucking insects such
as
mosquitoes detect warm-blooded animals as well as how IR-sensitive
snakes
find their prey."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0314_030314_secretweapons3_2.html
James Powell
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have got to be one of the most arrogant assholes I've ever seen
(except for Bob) if you think
for one moment that I'll let you get away with that.
Jd
Moron.
No, I am stating that my source (National Geographic) is more reputable
than
yours (Answers in Genesis) and therefore is more likely to have accurate
information.
Care to find a reputable source that does not link back to AIG that can
support any of your claims? Care to prove that any 'scientists' were even
properly quoted in AIG?
I found the easiest of sites for you to understand for mine. however, if
you
care to Google, you will find the consensus agrees with what I posted.
James Powell
No. I care nothing whatsoever about proving things to your satisfaction.
Jd
So you admit you have no interest in the facts, only in posting your own
fantasies.
James Powell
Well when you get right down to it, it's TRUTH that matters. And yes I can see why you might see
that as a fantasy.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
08 Jun 2007 04:59:51 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:uc7h63pemt9k0big671qkr28qc0vjv6h37@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:5tlp53l4bpghg33cc2eoojnkqs6vlp617r@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:iqpc535pr7e4qkoi9ir0c5mmuh9uaarp8d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:htu953tcio5pp2er2kasfmtkdqaska8rdi@4ax.com...
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out
forest
fires so it 'can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood'. The beetles have been shown
to
detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have
special
organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is
converted
to
heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never
before
been described in any living
thing."
Idiot.
"Melanophila acuminata beetles have what scientists call pit organs in
their
chests right at the point where the legs are attached to the body.
Within
each pit are 60 to 70 sensors called sensilla in insects. Each
sensillum
consists of a little sphere which is made of the same hard skin
material
that covers the beetle's outer shell. Each sphere is connected by
nerves
to
a highly-sensitive mechanoreceptive sensory cell."
"Incoming infrared radiation is absorbed by the outer sphere and
absorption
causes the sphere to expand a little bit," said Schmitz. "This
micromechanical event is measured by the mechanoreceptor and a
neuronal
signal is generated."
"Scientists have calculated that the European jewel beetle Melanophila
acuminata, about 1 cm. in length, can detect a 25-acre (10 hectares)
forest
fire from 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) away."
"Note: Melanophila acuminata beetles are not the only animals equipped
with
biological receptors capable of detecting infrared sources at even
great
distances. Scientists are also studying how blood-sucking insects such
as
mosquitoes detect warm-blooded animals as well as how IR-sensitive
snakes
find their prey."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0314_030314_secretweapons3_2.html
James Powell
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have got to be one of the most arrogant assholes I've ever seen
(except for Bob) if you think
for one moment that I'll let you get away with that.
Jd
Moron.
No, I am stating that my source (National Geographic) is more reputable
than
yours (Answers in Genesis) and therefore is more likely to have accurate
information.
Care to find a reputable source that does not link back to AIG that can
support any of your claims? Care to prove that any 'scientists' were
even
properly quoted in AIG?
I found the easiest of sites for you to understand for mine. however, if
you
care to Google, you will find the consensus agrees with what I posted.
James Powell
No. I care nothing whatsoever about proving things to your satisfaction.
Jd
So you admit you have no interest in the facts, only in posting your own
fantasies.
James Powell
Well when you get right down to it, it's TRUTH that matters. And yes I can
see why you might see
that as a fantasy.
Jd
You can't handle the TRUTH. That is why you hide in your little fantasy
world and post crap you think is insightful.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
14 Jun 2007 08:39:59 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:uc7h63pemt9k0big671qkr28qc0vjv6h37@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:5tlp53l4bpghg33cc2eoojnkqs6vlp617r@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:iqpc535pr7e4qkoi9ir0c5mmuh9uaarp8d@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:htu953tcio5pp2er2kasfmtkdqaska8rdi@4ax.com...
Firebug discovery
"The beetle Melanophila acuminata has long been known to seek out
forest
fires so it 'can lay its
eggs in nutritious, freshly burnt wood'. The beetles have been shown
to
detect fires from over 32
kilometres (20 miles) away, without using hearing or smell."
"Now German researchers have discovered how they do it. They have
special
organs of detection in
their chests which can pick up infrared light. The light is
converted
to
heat, which is then
converted to a mechanical signal. This sort of system has never
before
been described in any living
thing."
Idiot.
"Melanophila acuminata beetles have what scientists call pit organs in
their
chests right at the point where the legs are attached to the body.
Within
each pit are 60 to 70 sensors called sensilla in insects. Each
sensillum
consists of a little sphere which is made of the same hard skin
material
that covers the beetle's outer shell. Each sphere is connected by
nerves
to
a highly-sensitive mechanoreceptive sensory cell."
"Incoming infrared radiation is absorbed by the outer sphere and
absorption
causes the sphere to expand a little bit," said Schmitz. "This
micromechanical event is measured by the mechanoreceptor and a
neuronal
signal is generated."
"Scientists have calculated that the European jewel beetle Melanophila
acuminata, about 1 cm. in length, can detect a 25-acre (10 hectares)
forest
fire from 7.5 miles (12 kilometers) away."
"Note: Melanophila acuminata beetles are not the only animals equipped
with
biological receptors capable of detecting infrared sources at even
great
distances. Scientists are also studying how blood-sucking insects such
as
mosquitoes detect warm-blooded animals as well as how IR-sensitive
snakes
find their prey."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0314_030314_secretweapons3_2.html
James Powell
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have got to be one of the most arrogant assholes I've ever seen
(except for Bob) if you think
for one moment that I'll let you get away with that.
Jd
Moron.
No, I am stating that my source (National Geographic) is more reputable
than
yours (Answers in Genesis) and therefore is more likely to have accurate
information.
Care to find a reputable source that does not link back to AIG that can
support any of your claims? Care to prove that any 'scientists' were
even
properly quoted in AIG?
I found the easiest of sites for you to understand for mine. however, if
you
care to Google, you will find the consensus agrees with what I posted.
James Powell
No. I care nothing whatsoever about proving things to your satisfaction.
Jd
So you admit you have no interest in the facts, only in posting your own
fantasies.
James Powell
Well when you get right down to it, it's TRUTH that matters. And yes I can
see why you might see
that as a fantasy.
Jd
You can't handle the TRUTH. That is why you hide in your little fantasy
world and post crap you think is insightful.
James Powell
Wishful thinking on your part. I'm kickin' your ***** all over the place...
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
15 Jun 2007 04:49:51 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:3a2473pdfkn6fadi29uen95ja3qp2ddulq@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
<snip>
You can't handle the TRUTH. That is why you hide in your little fantasy
world and post crap you think is insightful.
James Powell
Wishful thinking on your part. I'm kickin' your ***** all over the place...
Jd
Wishful thinking on your part.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
25 May 2007 09:10:03 AM |
|
|
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
29 May 2007 06:43:58 PM |
|
|
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which I've been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new scientific data.
But look. Actually it's a good thing seeing as how I'd rather see you guys reading the Holy Bible
than stuff of the WWW.
Tell ya' what.... I just may get back to poting Bible verses again since you guys have taken such
offense to these scientific articles.
Jd
"And he said, It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob,
and to restore the preserved of Israel: I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that thou
mayest be my salvation unto the end of the earth." (Isaiah 49:6)
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
03 Jun 2007 06:26:46 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:eklp539q3tuhldje6616mj7a8snc0uuqrp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which I've
been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new
scientific data.
You have yet too show that anyof those scientists agree with your warped
version of their conclusions.
Therefore, you do not have any 'scientists' on your side.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
07 Jun 2007 05:19:23 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:eklp539q3tuhldje6616mj7a8snc0uuqrp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which I've
been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new
scientific data.
You have yet too show that anyof those scientists agree with your warped
version of their conclusions.
Therefore, you do not have any 'scientists' on your side.
James Powell
Well heck Powell, they certainly ain't on your side. I mean many of the studies\findings I've
presented here came from Christian sources.
So you're wrong. They actually *are* on my side.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
08 Jun 2007 05:20:31 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:n87h63d95ask6gkd98f1brgru7ihj8dki1@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:eklp539q3tuhldje6616mj7a8snc0uuqrp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which I've
been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new
scientific data.
You have yet too show that anyof those scientists agree with your warped
version of their conclusions.
Therefore, you do not have any 'scientists' on your side.
James Powell
Well heck Powell, they certainly ain't on your side. I mean many of the
studies\findings I've
presented here came from Christian sources.
Meaning they are biased reporting of the findings made by scientists, not
the report from the scientists themselves. Therefore, you do not have any
scientists on your side. You have pseuodo-religious whack-jobs. If you read
the original results, rather thantrying to 'interpret' them, you will find
no support.
James Powell
So you're wrong. They actually *are* on my side.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
14 Jun 2007 08:39:58 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:n87h63d95ask6gkd98f1brgru7ihj8dki1@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:eklp539q3tuhldje6616mj7a8snc0uuqrp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists are
smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which I've
been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new
scientific data.
You have yet too show that anyof those scientists agree with your warped
version of their conclusions.
Therefore, you do not have any 'scientists' on your side.
James Powell
Well heck Powell, they certainly ain't on your side. I mean many of the
studies\findings I've
presented here came from Christian sources.
Meaning they are biased reporting of the findings made by scientists, not
the report from the scientists themselves. Therefore, you do not have any
scientists on your side. You have pseuodo-religious whack-jobs. If you read
the original results, rather thantrying to 'interpret' them, you will find
no support.
James Powell
No sir. They are on my side but you are offended.
The following for example, is a piece I reported on months ago that yet it affirms evolution, it
admits the likelyhood that science has made a 1 million year error in it's "theory" (And you
certainly can't deny the validity of Harvard and MIT)....
"Boston scientists released a provocative report yesterday that challenges the timeline of human
evolution and suggests that human ancestors bred with chimpanzee ancestors long after they had
initially separated into two species. The researchers, working at the Cambridge-based Broad
Institute of Harvard and MIT, used a wealth of newly available genetic data to estimate the time
when the first human ancestors split from the chimpanzees. The team arrived at an answer that is at
least 1 million years later than paleontologists had believed, based on fossils of early, humanlike
creatures."
http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2006/05/18/humans_chimps_may_have_bred_after_split/
So through my literary skills, I put Harvard and MIT on my side and ignorant folks like you could do
virtually little about it.
If you were as bright as I, you would take the following and show how it includes evolution.....
Genesis 1:24-25 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle,
and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind": and it was so. And God made the beast of
the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
..... but you ain't. That's why I can freely give you ammo to use against me seeing you've run out
months ago.
Jd
"Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away." - Jesus (Luke 21:33)
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
15 Jun 2007 04:48:54 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:jl0473h42k059mp361e5k2hk6472vt601m@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:n87h63d95ask6gkd98f1brgru7ihj8dki1@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:eklp539q3tuhldje6616mj7a8snc0uuqrp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists
are
smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which I've
been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new
scientific data.
You have yet too show that anyof those scientists agree with your warped
version of their conclusions.
Therefore, you do not have any 'scientists' on your side.
James Powell
Well heck Powell, they certainly ain't on your side. I mean many of the
studies\findings I've
presented here came from Christian sources.
Meaning they are biased reporting of the findings made by scientists, not
the report from the scientists themselves. Therefore, you do not have any
scientists on your side. You have pseuodo-religious whack-jobs. If you
read
the original results, rather thantrying to 'interpret' them, you will find
no support.
James Powell
No sir. They are on my side but you are offended.
The following for example, is a piece I reported on months ago that yet it
affirms evolution, it
admits the likelyhood that science has made a 1 million year error in it's
"theory" (And you
certainly can't deny the validity of Harvard and MIT)....
Which says nothing at all about the validity of evolutionary theory, as was
pointed out to you at that time. There is no 'million year error' except in
your mind. There is a reassessment of the theory based on new facts. It may
or may not mean a million year adjustment in the timeline.
Your 'spin' on the story is what is being commented on. The story does NOT
support the spurious claims you followed it with. The scientists do not
support any of your whacky claims.
If you were as bright as I, you would take the following and show how it
includes evolution.....
Genesis 1:24-25 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living
creature after his kind, cattle,
and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind": and it was so.
And God made the beast of
the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing
that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
In the first place, I do not need the Bible to 'support' evolution. It does
not matter whether the Bible includes or excludes evolution, as it is not a
science book. The Bible is irrelevant to the discussion.
Furthermore, it is a lame set of scripture. There are other verses that
could be used to support evolution much more strongly than these.
James Powell>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
18 Jun 2007 05:04:39 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:jl0473h42k059mp361e5k2hk6472vt601m@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:n87h63d95ask6gkd98f1brgru7ihj8dki1@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:eklp539q3tuhldje6616mj7a8snc0uuqrp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists
are
smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which I've
been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new
scientific data.
You have yet too show that anyof those scientists agree with your warped
version of their conclusions.
Therefore, you do not have any 'scientists' on your side.
James Powell
Well heck Powell, they certainly ain't on your side. I mean many of the
studies\findings I've
presented here came from Christian sources.
Meaning they are biased reporting of the findings made by scientists, not
the report from the scientists themselves. Therefore, you do not have any
scientists on your side. You have pseuodo-religious whack-jobs. If you
read
the original results, rather thantrying to 'interpret' them, you will find
no support.
James Powell
No sir. They are on my side but you are offended.
The following for example, is a piece I reported on months ago that yet it
affirms evolution, it
admits the likelyhood that science has made a 1 million year error in it's
"theory" (And you
certainly can't deny the validity of Harvard and MIT)....
Which says nothing at all about the validity of evolutionary theory, as was
pointed out to you at that time. There is no 'million year error' except in
your mind. There is a reassessment of the theory based on new facts. It may
or may not mean a million year adjustment in the timeline.
Your 'spin' on the story is what is being commented on. The story does NOT
support the spurious claims you followed it with. The scientists do not
support any of your whacky claims.
If you were as bright as I, you would take the following and show how it
includes evolution.....
Genesis 1:24-25 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living
creature after his kind, cattle,
and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind": and it was so.
And God made the beast of
the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing
that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
In the first place, I do not need the Bible to 'support' evolution. It does
not matter whether the Bible includes or excludes evolution, as it is not a
science book. The Bible is irrelevant to the discussion.
Furthermore, it is a lame set of scripture. There are other verses that
could be used to support evolution much more strongly than these.
James Powell>
Fine. Then you preach evolution and I'll preach salvation and repentance. Meanwhile I can show how
all men are equal since all have sinned and all can repent and be saved, while you can only preach
random success by mutation and muscle.
Furthermore, you think negroes are less evolved than white men since evolution supposedly started in
Africa where you admit men evolved from apes.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
18 Jun 2007 05:19:24 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ic6e73dffjq0jksbnq7pi3aoe64tcn8425@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:jl0473h42k059mp361e5k2hk6472vt601m@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:n87h63d95ask6gkd98f1brgru7ihj8dki1@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:eklp539q3tuhldje6616mj7a8snc0uuqrp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists
are
smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which
I've
been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new
scientific data.
You have yet too show that anyof those scientists agree with your
warped
version of their conclusions.
Therefore, you do not have any 'scientists' on your side.
James Powell
Well heck Powell, they certainly ain't on your side. I mean many of
the
studies\findings I've
presented here came from Christian sources.
Meaning they are biased reporting of the findings made by scientists,
not
the report from the scientists themselves. Therefore, you do not have
any
scientists on your side. You have pseuodo-religious whack-jobs. If you
read
the original results, rather thantrying to 'interpret' them, you will
find
no support.
James Powell
No sir. They are on my side but you are offended.
The following for example, is a piece I reported on months ago that yet
it
affirms evolution, it
admits the likelyhood that science has made a 1 million year error in
it's
"theory" (And you
certainly can't deny the validity of Harvard and MIT)....
Which says nothing at all about the validity of evolutionary theory, as
was
pointed out to you at that time. There is no 'million year error' except
in
your mind. There is a reassessment of the theory based on new facts. It
may
or may not mean a million year adjustment in the timeline.
Your 'spin' on the story is what is being commented on. The story does NOT
support the spurious claims you followed it with. The scientists do not
support any of your whacky claims.
If you were as bright as I, you would take the following and show how it
includes evolution.....
Genesis 1:24-25 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living
creature after his kind, cattle,
and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind": and it was
so.
And God made the beast of
the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing
that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
In the first place, I do not need the Bible to 'support' evolution. It
does
not matter whether the Bible includes or excludes evolution, as it is not
a
science book. The Bible is irrelevant to the discussion.
Furthermore, it is a lame set of scripture. There are other verses that
could be used to support evolution much more strongly than these.
James Powell>
Fine. Then you preach evolution and I'll preach salvation and repentance.
Meanwhile I can show how
all men are equal since all have sinned and all can repent and be saved,
while you can only preach
random success by mutation and muscle.
Sorry, I do not 'preach' anything. Evolution does not need any help from me.
It exists, whether you like it or not. Evolution does not depend on random
success, which shows your ignorance of the subject.
Your preaching is only applicable to the particular subset of religions that
believe in sin, repentance and salvation. Unfortunately for you, that is NOT
the majority of humanity. Furthermore, you are roundly criticized and
ridiculed by followers of such faith whenever you try to 'preach'. Give it
up, son. You are useless.
Furthermore, you think negroes are less evolved than white men since
evolution supposedly started in
Africa where you admit men evolved from apes.
You are wrong, as usual. Keep your little racist comments to yourself and do
not try to project them on others.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
28 Jun 2007 05:34:54 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ic6e73dffjq0jksbnq7pi3aoe64tcn8425@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:jl0473h42k059mp361e5k2hk6472vt601m@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:n87h63d95ask6gkd98f1brgru7ihj8dki1@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:eklp539q3tuhldje6616mj7a8snc0uuqrp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Hold it right there numbskull. Are you saying that your scientists
are
smarter than my scientists?
You have no scientists.
lojbab
What? You also disagree with the findings of recent science which
I've
been posting here? I'm
surprised that so many of you humanists are so closed minded to new
scientific data.
You have yet too show that anyof those scientists agree with your
warped
version of their conclusions.
Therefore, you do not have any 'scientists' on your side.
James Powell
Well heck Powell, they certainly ain't on your side. I mean many of
the
studies\findings I've
presented here came from Christian sources.
Meaning they are biased reporting of the findings made by scientists,
not
the report from the scientists themselves. Therefore, you do not have
any
scientists on your side. You have pseuodo-religious whack-jobs. If you
read
the original results, rather thantrying to 'interpret' them, you will
find
no support.
James Powell
No sir. They are on my side but you are offended.
The following for example, is a piece I reported on months ago that yet
it
affirms evolution, it
admits the likelyhood that science has made a 1 million year error in
it's
"theory" (And you
certainly can't deny the validity of Harvard and MIT)....
Which says nothing at all about the validity of evolutionary theory, as
was
pointed out to you at that time. There is no 'million year error' except
in
your mind. There is a reassessment of the theory based on new facts. It
may
or may not mean a million year adjustment in the timeline.
Your 'spin' on the story is what is being commented on. The story does NOT
support the spurious claims you followed it with. The scientists do not
support any of your whacky claims.
If you were as bright as I, you would take the following and show how it
includes evolution.....
Genesis 1:24-25 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth the living
creature after his kind, cattle,
and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind": and it was
so.
And God made the beast of
the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing
that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
In the first place, I do not need the Bible to 'support' evolution. It
does
not matter whether the Bible includes or excludes evolution, as it is not
a
science book. The Bible is irrelevant to the discussion.
Furthermore, it is a lame set of scripture. There are other verses that
could be used to support evolution much more strongly than these.
James Powell>
Fine. Then you preach evolution and I'll preach salvation and repentance.
Meanwhile I can show how
all men are equal since all have sinned and all can repent and be saved,
while you can only preach
random success by mutation and muscle.
Sorry, I do not 'preach' anything. Evolution does not need any help from me.
It exists, whether you like it or not. Evolution does not depend on random
success, which shows your ignorance of the subject.
Your preaching is only applicable to the particular subset of religions that
believe in sin, repentance and salvation. Unfortunately for you, that is NOT
the majority of humanity. Furthermore, you are roundly criticized and
ridiculed by followers of such faith whenever you try to 'preach'. Give it
up, son. You are useless.
Furthermore, you think negroes are less evolved than white men since
evolution supposedly started in
Africa where you admit men evolved from apes.
You are wrong, as usual. Keep your little racist comments to yourself and do
not try to project them on others.
James Powell
Let's slow down a bit and see what the deal is.
1) Do you agree that most of the earliest skeletal evidence of "humans" has been found in Africa,
and that that evidence has lead evolutionists to say that humans originated in Africa?
Yes or no.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
29 Jun 2007 05:06:07 PM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:guj8831oj3q86elnhm6ihajrvj6fmktsc7@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ic6e73dffjq0jksbnq7pi3aoe64tcn8425@4ax.com...
SNIP
It would be nice if you could learn how to trim conversations or stay on a
single track.
Fine. Then you preach evolution and I'll preach salvation and
repentance.
Meanwhile I can show how
all men are equal since all have sinned and all can repent and be saved,
while you can only preach
random success by mutation and muscle.
Sorry, I do not 'preach' anything. Evolution does not need any help from
me.
It exists, whether you like it or not. Evolution does not depend on random
success, which shows your ignorance of the subject.
Your preaching is only applicable to the particular subset of religions
that
believe in sin, repentance and salvation. Unfortunately for you, that is
NOT
the majority of humanity. Furthermore, you are roundly criticized and
ridiculed by followers of such faith whenever you try to 'preach'. Give it
up, son. You are useless.
Furthermore, you think negroes are less evolved than white men since
evolution supposedly started in
Africa where you admit men evolved from apes.
You are wrong, as usual. Keep your little racist comments to yourself and
do
not try to project them on others.
James Powell
Let's slow down a bit and see what the deal is.
1) Do you agree that most of the earliest skeletal evidence of "humans"
has been found in Africa,
and that that evidence has lead evolutionists to say that humans
originated in Africa?
Yes or no.
Jd
According to the leading theories, genus Homo originated on the continent we
now refer to as Africa. There are conflicting theories that genus Homo
originated in multiple locations and has 'coalesced' into the current
species.
I tend to be in the single point camp.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
30 Jun 2007 09:36:07 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:guj8831oj3q86elnhm6ihajrvj6fmktsc7@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ic6e73dffjq0jksbnq7pi3aoe64tcn8425@4ax.com...
SNIP
It would be nice if you could learn how to trim conversations or stay on a
single track.
Fine. Then you preach evolution and I'll preach salvation and
repentance.
Meanwhile I can show how
all men are equal since all have sinned and all can repent and be saved,
while you can only preach
random success by mutation and muscle.
Sorry, I do not 'preach' anything. Evolution does not need any help from
me.
It exists, whether you like it or not. Evolution does not depend on random
success, which shows your ignorance of the subject.
Your preaching is only applicable to the particular subset of religions
that
believe in sin, repentance and salvation. Unfortunately for you, that is
NOT
the majority of humanity. Furthermore, you are roundly criticized and
ridiculed by followers of such faith whenever you try to 'preach'. Give it
up, son. You are useless.
Furthermore, you think negroes are less evolved than white men since
evolution supposedly started in
Africa where you admit men evolved from apes.
You are wrong, as usual. Keep your little racist comments to yourself and
do
not try to project them on others.
James Powell
Let's slow down a bit and see what the deal is.
1) Do you agree that most of the earliest skeletal evidence of "humans"
has been found in Africa,
and that that evidence has lead evolutionists to say that humans
originated in Africa?
Yes or no.
Jd
According to the leading theories, genus Homo originated on the continent we
now refer to as Africa. There are conflicting theories that genus Homo
originated in multiple locations and has 'coalesced' into the current
species.
I tend to be in the single point camp.
James Powell
Good. Now what race has occupied Africa as far back as recorded civilization to this present day is
concerned?
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
01 Jul 2007 09:06:41 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:krae83h6cnb1j763ickqpco6ggn60mj8k4@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:guj8831oj3q86elnhm6ihajrvj6fmktsc7@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ic6e73dffjq0jksbnq7pi3aoe64tcn8425@4ax.com...
SNIP
It would be nice if you could learn how to trim conversations or stay on a
single track.
Fine. Then you preach evolution and I'll preach salvation and
repentance.
Meanwhile I can show how
all men are equal since all have sinned and all can repent and be
saved,
while you can only preach
random success by mutation and muscle.
Sorry, I do not 'preach' anything. Evolution does not need any help from
me.
It exists, whether you like it or not. Evolution does not depend on
random
success, which shows your ignorance of the subject.
Your preaching is only applicable to the particular subset of religions
that
believe in sin, repentance and salvation. Unfortunately for you, that is
NOT
the majority of humanity. Furthermore, you are roundly criticized and
ridiculed by followers of such faith whenever you try to 'preach'. Give
it
up, son. You are useless.
Furthermore, you think negroes are less evolved than white men since
evolution supposedly started in
Africa where you admit men evolved from apes.
You are wrong, as usual. Keep your little racist comments to yourself
and
do
not try to project them on others.
James Powell
Let's slow down a bit and see what the deal is.
1) Do you agree that most of the earliest skeletal evidence of "humans"
has been found in Africa,
and that that evidence has lead evolutionists to say that humans
originated in Africa?
Yes or no.
Jd
According to the leading theories, genus Homo originated on the continent
we
now refer to as Africa. There are conflicting theories that genus Homo
originated in multiple locations and has 'coalesced' into the current
species.
I tend to be in the single point camp.
James Powell
Good. Now what race has occupied Africa as far back as recorded
civilization to this present day is
concerned?
Jd
Irrelevant, as the concept of 'race' does not apply to Homo sapiens in any
meaningful biological fashion.
Furthermore, all populations of Homo sapiens have evolved at the same rate,
regardless of what continent they are or have been occupying.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
20 Jul 2007 07:59:10 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:krae83h6cnb1j763ickqpco6ggn60mj8k4@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:guj8831oj3q86elnhm6ihajrvj6fmktsc7@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ic6e73dffjq0jksbnq7pi3aoe64tcn8425@4ax.com...
SNIP
It would be nice if you could learn how to trim conversations or stay on a
single track.
Fine. Then you preach evolution and I'll preach salvation and
repentance.
Meanwhile I can show how
all men are equal since all have sinned and all can repent and be
saved,
while you can only preach
random success by mutation and muscle.
Sorry, I do not 'preach' anything. Evolution does not need any help from
me.
It exists, whether you like it or not. Evolution does not depend on
random
success, which shows your ignorance of the subject.
Your preaching is only applicable to the particular subset of religions
that
believe in sin, repentance and salvation. Unfortunately for you, that is
NOT
the majority of humanity. Furthermore, you are roundly criticized and
ridiculed by followers of such faith whenever you try to 'preach'. Give
it
up, son. You are useless.
Furthermore, you think negroes are less evolved than white men since
evolution supposedly started in
Africa where you admit men evolved from apes.
You are wrong, as usual. Keep your little racist comments to yourself
and
do
not try to project them on others.
James Powell
Let's slow down a bit and see what the deal is.
1) Do you agree that most of the earliest skeletal evidence of "humans"
has been found in Africa,
and that that evidence has lead evolutionists to say that humans
originated in Africa?
Yes or no.
Jd
According to the leading theories, genus Homo originated on the continent
we
now refer to as Africa. There are conflicting theories that genus Homo
originated in multiple locations and has 'coalesced' into the current
species.
I tend to be in the single point camp.
James Powell
Good. Now what race has occupied Africa as far back as recorded
civilization to this present day is
concerned?
Jd
Irrelevant, as the concept of 'race' does not apply to Homo sapiens in any
meaningful biological fashion.
Furthermore, all populations of Homo sapiens have evolved at the same rate,
regardless of what continent they are or have been occupying.
James Powell
So you're suggesting that white man and black man evolved on the very same day.
That's quite a smart thing to suggest seeing that evolutionary theory is so stupid.
But would it not be even smarter for you to suggest that the first population of humans were
"chocolates"?
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
21 Jul 2007 08:36:56 AM |
|
|
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:rgn2a312k19dpcbjhuabp925h05b10b2k7@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:krae83h6cnb1j763ickqpco6ggn60mj8k4@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:guj8831oj3q86elnhm6ihajrvj6fmktsc7@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Jd" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:ic6e73dffjq0jksbnq7pi3aoe64tcn8425@4ax.com...
SNIP
Furthermore, you think negroes are less evolved than white men since
evolution supposedly started in
Africa where you admit men evolved from apes.
You are wrong, as usual. Keep your little racist comments to yourself
and
do
not try to project them on others.
James Powell
Let's slow down a bit and see what the deal is.
1) Do you agree that most of the earliest skeletal evidence of
"humans"
has been found in Africa,
and that that evidence has lead evolutionists to say that humans
originated in Africa?
Yes or no.
Jd
According to the leading theories, genus Homo originated on the
continent
we
now refer to as Africa. There are conflicting theories that genus Homo
originated in multiple locations and has 'coalesced' into the current
species.
I tend to be in the single point camp.
James Powell
Good. Now what race has occupied Africa as far back as recorded
civilization to this present day is
concerned?
Jd
Irrelevant, as the concept of 'race' does not apply to Homo sapiens in any
meaningful biological fashion.
Furthermore, all populations of Homo sapiens have evolved at the same
rate,
regardless of what continent they are or have been occupying.
James Powell
So you're suggesting that white man and black man evolved on the very same
day.
You are projecting again, as I have made no such suggestion. Do not blame me
if you cannot understand what I have stated.
That's quite a smart thing to suggest seeing that evolutionary theory is
so stupid.
No, the stupidity lies within those who cannot understand the concept.
But would it not be even smarter for you to suggest that the first
population of humans were
"chocolates"?
Last time I checked, chocolate was discovered by humans around 250 C.E. I am
not sure when the first humaniform molds were made, but it was probably
within the last 1000 years.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
21 Jul 2007 12:24:05 AM |
|
|
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Irrelevant, as the concept of 'race' does not apply to Homo sapiens in any
meaningful biological fashion.
Furthermore, all populations of Homo sapiens have evolved at the same rate,
regardless of what continent they are or have been occupying.
James Powell
So you're suggesting that white man and black man evolved on the very same day.
That's quite a smart thing to suggest seeing that evolutionary theory is so stupid.
But would it not be even smarter for you to suggest that the first population of humans were
"chocolates"?
The first population of humans were "humans". So have all the rest.
There were neither "blacks" nor "whites", until there were sick
societies set up that attempted to divide people on the basis of their
skin color.
There were no "whites" until the day that someone labeled someone a
"black" or a "white". That was relatively recent - within the last
few centuries. And it was and still is a social convention and not
reality.
lojbab
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
01 Jul 2007 01:18:04 AM |
|
|
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
According to the leading theories, genus Homo originated on the continent we
now refer to as Africa. There are conflicting theories that genus Homo
originated in multiple locations and has 'coalesced' into the current
species.
I tend to be in the single point camp.
James Powell
Good. Now what race has occupied Africa as far back as recorded civilization to this present day is
concerned?
The human race, which is the only race that we know of.
Recorded civilization is of course a tiny fraction of the total time
that homo sapiens has existed. The earliest writings were around 4000
years ago (and they weren't in Africa and of course did not mention
Africa), and homo sapiens has been around upwards of 100,000 years.
lojbab
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jd" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
20 Jul 2007 07:59:09 PM |
|
|
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
According to the leading theories, genus Homo originated on the continent we
now refer to as Africa. There are conflicting theories that genus Homo
originated in multiple locations and has 'coalesced' into the current
species.
I tend to be in the single point camp.
James Powell
Good. Now what race has occupied Africa as far back as recorded civilization to this present day is
concerned?
The human race, which is the only race that we know of.
Sorry to inform you Bob but Darwin wondered whether or not humans should be classified into
"species" or "races"..... and up to 63 at that....
"Man has been studied more carefully than any other animal, and yet there is the greatest possible
diversity amongst capable judges whether he should be classed as a single species or
race, or as two (Virey), as three (Jacquinot), as four (Kant), five (Blumenbach), six (Buffon),
seven (Hunter), eight (Agassiz), eleven (Pickering), fifteen (Bory de St-Vincent), sixteen
(Desmoulins), twenty-two (Morton), sixty (Crawfurd), or as sixty-three, according to
Burke." "This diversity of judgment does not prove that the races ought not to be ranked as species,
but it shews that they graduate into each other, and that it is hardly possible to discover clear
distinctive characters between them." Charles Darwin (Descent of Man Chapter VII - On the Races of
Man)
Recorded civilization is of course a tiny fraction of the total time
that homo sapiens has existed. The earliest writings were around 4000
years ago (and they weren't in Africa and of course did not mention
Africa), and homo sapiens has been around upwards of 100,000 years.
lojbab
Bob, God created man. You do not believe that by "faith". Faith in something else which has never
been proven. And now you've become a bigot who detests free speech and the entire concept of freedom
and liberty which was enumerated in the founding documents of this nation.....
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit
of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed." (Declaration of Independence)
And that's ok with me. Law or no law. Rules or no rules. Morals or no morals. But don't be surprised
by the consequences of your choices, which you have no control over whatsoever.
1Corinthians 6:12 "All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things
are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any."
Jd [ZionsFire]
"The Lord shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies."
(Psalms 110:2)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
21 Jul 2007 12:20:27 AM |
|
|
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Jd <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
According to the leading theories, genus Homo originated on the continent we
now refer to as Africa. There are conflicting theories that genus Homo
originated in multiple locations and has 'coalesced' into the current
species.
I tend to be in the single point camp.
James Powell
Good. Now what race has occupied Africa as far back as recorded civilization to this present day is
concerned?
The human race, which is the only race that we know of.
Sorry to inform you Bob but Darwin wondered whether or not humans should be classified into
"species" or "races"..... and up to 63 at that....
Darwin could wonder whatever he wanted. There is only one human race.
Recorded civilization is of course a tiny fraction of the total time
that homo sapiens has existed. The earliest writings were around 4000
years ago (and they weren't in Africa and of course did not mention
Africa), and homo sapiens has been around upwards of 100,000 years.
Bob, God created man.
So. He did so through natural means.
You do not believe that by "faith".
Of course I do. I believe it, and it can never be evidenced,
therefore my belief must be by faith.
And now you've become a bigot who detests free speech
Nope. You are the only bigot in this discussion.
and the entire concept of freedom
and liberty which was enumerated in the founding documents of this nation.....
Get thee behind me, servant of the Prince of Lies!
lojbab
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Bug found having IR sensors: evolutionists wonder |
28 Jun 2007 08:39:22 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:34:54 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
