<johnw_94020@yahoo.com> wrote:

You didn't e-mail me a letter about "Animals in Heaven" that included
a picture of your pit bull?

Sorry forgot about that

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:24:41 -0700, "Bible John"
<johnw_94020@yahoo.com> wrote:
copyright 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of
this article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of
the author

First I have not emailed you since February, so whomever is emailing you
is
not me.

You didn't e-mail me a letter about "Animals in Heaven" that included
a picture of your pit bull?

I think that Zadok is behind the impersonations of me (from aol,

and another from Europe). But perhaps there are others, unless Zadok is
dialing into a Europe server (expensive phone bill). A impersonation of
my
governor today has been traced back to Zadok, so I figure he is behind the
bogus posts and emails from me.

When me and Jason were buds he told me that sometimes people would email
him, and claim to be me. Perhaps this is till going on, and Jason thinks
these hate emails and messages are from me.

Second I do not appreciate your public grammar lessons (as I have
mentioned
many times that Usenet is a casual writing environment.

Casual writing (which I do) and BUTCHERED English "When me and
Jason..." (instead of "When Jason and I ..."

are two different worlds.

Casual writing means you have relaxed the rules momentarily. Your
"writing" indicates
1. you don't know the rules
2. you don't CARE to know the rules.

And it's a BLATANTLY obvious statement of your
a. rebellion
b. immaturity



I've ben published

in newspapers (http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible), and online magazines
(http://johnw.freeshell.org/softwarereviews/)

All you are saying is that the standards for online publications are
considerably lower than for hard copy.

I am constantly writing to online publications correcting their sloppy
grammar and punctuation.


They have responded any number of times that the sloppy grammar,
spelling, and punctuation are DELIBERATE.

You may not see a very blatant attack on our culture, since you seem
only concerned with the attack on spiritual values.

However, if you had studied the writing of Dr Frances Schaeffer, as I
have, you might be more concerned. His book "The Rise and Fall of
Western Civilization" (America) is a classic.

His point being that one of the ways Satan is destroying mankind is by
attacking not only our religious values, but our culture.

Usenet is not the same). I

have been silent and have tried communicating with gentleness

and with >respect,

I don't call referring to me as "Weatherly" being "gentle or
respectful."

However, if one of your "quirks" is the DELIBERATE butchering of the
language (as it appears is the case), and you have NO intention of
changing that and beginning to respect a language I LOVE (I have made
a LOT of money by knowing the rules, and by respecting them), don't
expect me to change my habit of correcting you.

If you are going to bug me with tortured English, I'm going to bug you
back by correcting you.

I remind you AGAIN that you are not compelled to read my replies.

but I'm afraid I can no longer do so.

Don't be afraid. It's not of God.

John you really should take your own grammar lessons, as it appears you
need
help in this area.

AGAIN, BJ, I have said repeatedly, it's one thing to make an
occasional error. IT's quite another to not even know the rules-- or
care to know them.

I certainly admit to the occasional error, since I OPENLY have stated
that I don't correct my posts.

You wouldn't know how to write good prose if it killed you. You have
repeatedly posted "polished" writing, and I and any number of others
have ripped it to shreds, and left you backpeddling and stammering
that "well, Mr )(&)(*&&)&)(* thought it was good!"


I also suggest you see a therapist as soon as possible.

I suggest you do likewise.

Your posts are filled with hate

On the contrary, BJ.

And I'll recommend that you AGAIN stop trying to play therapist.

You violated my deepest trust once. Keep up your present course, and
we may yet face off in a libel court.

and few can recognize your Christian fruits

How about yours, BJ? Meekness, gentleness.

(Gal 5:22) which are love, joy, peace, kindness, goodness, gentleness,
faithfulness, and self control.

Before YOU judge ME, "walk a mile in my shoes."

John you are saved no doubt, but appear to have some very serious
psychological issues.

smirk.

Please get help! You are embarrassing the Christians

here.

BJ, you, like Elaine, are the LAST person to be judging anyone's
spiritual character.


I am one of MANY in here who have attempted to exhort YOU. Christians
are SUPPOSED to be able to correct one another.

And Deacon (before your time), and Kay, and Larry, and a few others
HAVE corrected me.

But when you REFUSE To be corrected (as YOU do), do not presume to
correct me or anyone else.

I will say again what I have said before, when you remain in an
uncorrectable attitude, BJ,

1. you need some INTENSE therapy.

2. you are apostate


john w

John

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 03:11:40 -0700, john w <johnw<no_spam>@yoo.hoo>
wrote:

BJ, you, like Elaine, are the LAST person to be judging anyone's
spiritual character.

I don't judge character. I DO judge BEHAVIOR.
GOD IS THE JUDGE, old boy - not me, you, or anyone else.