| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
15 Dec 2005 12:50:29 PM |
| Object: |
Canada v. George W. Bush - Trial of the Mllennium |
I again, near the end of your free time here, am asking for Americans
to help
me protect our freedom as it pertains to the false allegations that
have been
leveled against myself as a true living god by your seriously criminal
demon
leader dictator, the truly evil, Mr. bush Jr.
Consider the value of my words that hold the last of my hope for
Justice to
succeed with your love. God is truly great, but nobody at corporate
control
will grant me to speak politely regarding the facts on our real
suffering.
Please, do not forsake me as the North American people have been
denied to
hear my simple arguments broadcasted.
These following two Motions I am sending you have been filed at the
Court of
Queen's Bench here in Winnipeg, as a prelude to a Court
challenge
unprecedented in our history. I am hoping I can interest you in
realizing
that this challenge is not only important to me as a free citizen,
but also
for ourselves as the concerned world community.
[the motions and affidavit have also gone to federal offices
(Constitutional)
and the Provincal]
I continue to beg Americans to save the lives of their children by
pleading on
their national radio broadcasts for the airing of my defense, but
it would
seem, it's just to much trouble for anyone to care for.
Please, be Human, and call me for an interview.
Thanks for your consideration.
-----------------
AFFIDAVIT
AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD
I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
MAKE OATH AND SAY:
1=2E
Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer
about $100,000 to
hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in
India and confirmed
by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street
Journal, 10/10/01, AFP,
10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's
direction is Saeed
Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel
Pearl in February
2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News
they've now
tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in
Florida to accounts
held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01]
CNN also
reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it
came in 2000.
[CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order
must have
preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening
bank accounts and
receiving the money ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi
between June
19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]
2=2E
On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had
received
anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated
September 9th, 2001,
originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade
Afghanistan premised
on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up
the allegations,
thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads
innocence to a
crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify"
sacrificing American
GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving
Enron. ["The Dahbol
Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been
sufficient to
have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had
offered [as others
of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years.
CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any
follow up on the
intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere,
our public
devolvement of a just society.
3=2E
RT=C9 News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
21 September 2001 17:41
The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban
for proof that
Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to
the US Secretary
of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try
bin Laden in an
American court.
The US Government said there would be no negotiations.
4=2E
[This following document was the official damning account]
Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
4 October 2001
http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp
[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]
"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against
Usama Bin Laden
in a court of law."
The document doesn't hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?
5=2E
Investigating the Investigation
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=3D17816
After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did
the vice president
call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?"
Daschle flatly
contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan.
28 the president
himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request."
..=2E.."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr.
Bush four days
later, but "on other dates following" as well.
6=2E
ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219=
..html
Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop
investigations into a
suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and
the Sept. 11
attacks...
`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'
7=2E
October 9 2001 - The Times of India
"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that
former ISI [the
"Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement
after being
superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed
here on
Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India
produced to show his
links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade
Center. The U.S.
authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000
were wired to WTC
hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed]
at the
instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have
confirmed that
India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the
money transfer and the
role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide
details, they said that
Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the
FBI in tracing
and establishing the link."
8=2E
No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So
according to Bush's
official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself
claimed he played no
part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink
of starvation, Laden
agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC
and CNN denied
to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American
GIs. Once the
indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the
country of
Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to
defend US
innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the
clear to all fake
video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking
remotely like Laden,
but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose
is HALF as long in
proportion to Laden's for example, and surely frightfully shocking
for some, the actor
doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two
faces never aired on
CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the
Internet.
9=2E
former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill
"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil
corporate interests and
the role played by Saudi Arabia."
10.
Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von
Buelow
"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop
Al-Qaeda. They
threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he
knows."
11.
Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete
innocence
with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty."
12.
www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=3D14
" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the
Sept. 11 hijackers
were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She
said documents also
included information relating to their financial activities. "
13.
The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can
not be understated
as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of
Afghanistan to
save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving
Enron.
From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz
" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy
Task Force
meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be
taken to remove the
Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the
United States
controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999
and have known
since then about the Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of
contract lawsuit in US
District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the
Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500
million arbitration
settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the
United States
Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas."
14.
From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
York), 25 May 2002:
"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt]
Guckenheimer, an
assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If
there was anybody
there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there
were women and
children to kill them."
15.
Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial
Bombing of
Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"
by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire
When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village
of Chowkar-
Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least
93 civilians, a
Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted
them dead." The
reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the
Chowkar incident,
Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village."
16.
US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm
"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians
- some of whom
are entirely innocent.
And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out
from the Pentagon's
spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was
no dilemma
when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled
the trigger."
The Crown would argue this issue isn't in her jurisdiction, however,
it is in mine as a
expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An
irrational tyranny
that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and
false imprisonments.
An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to
kill God's
children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they"
knew that too?
17.
Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally
responsible for
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml
18.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B=
..htm
"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no
weapons, but that
with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran."
19.
http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=3D1872
CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating
the Internet of two
Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the
two boys who are
giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in
English that reads, "Lcpl
Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!"
(Link to photo: http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)
20.
Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was
frustrated"
[this story was on Bush's top secret W199i directive]
This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC
reporter no more that
thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a
national news
report on it.
21.
INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with
radiation?
SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.
INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.
SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.
"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a
river. It poisons the
grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water
table. When it gets
into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of
radioactivity and heavy
metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you
get genetic
alterations."
[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals,
oxidized to
microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been
deposited in our airspace,
however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the
scientifically measurable
extremely serious health concern issue..]
22.
Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary
power to use military
force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and
are unreviewable."
Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the
torturing of
innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush
doesn't have to justify
his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter."
23.
The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president
Bush personally
signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
(See original at
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)
24.
U=2ES. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'
"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes
and that forcing
Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal.
He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy
Massey, who is
expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30
unarmed Iraqis,
including women and a six-year-old child, at
a U.S. military checkpoint."
25.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html
that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees,
ordering Defense
Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning,
confiscating evidence
of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."
26.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml
A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly
retaliating against him
for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction to support the
White House's pre-war position.
27.
``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does,
kill people, and I
had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a
criminal war. Any act of
violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''
28.
Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light
him up!" the
sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire,
killing the unarmed
man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over
which of them had
scored Company C's first kill.
29.
It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio,
precinct that tallied
4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted.
30.
http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970
http://wallofhate.com
Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian
[JEWISH] school girl is
about to die
"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of
about 10. She's behind the
embankment, scared to death."
"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a
three-year-old, needs to be
killed."
31.
US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery
rounds on Monday,
said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan
district said one
building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on
the neighborhood
overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's
northwest.
[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all
TRUE accounts
of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was
forbidden to leave,
exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]
32.
The Bush Administration
In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST
By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle
"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim
that the
White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations
against al Qaeda and
the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush
had requested a CIA
briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats.
And Rice's assertion
this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to
the side" appeared to be
contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the
Pentagon to begin
planning military options for an invasion of Iraq."
[ And...]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html
"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim
that the White
House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against
al Qaeda and the
Taliban."
This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior
experiences of Muslim
fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion
[Jihad] to persecute
the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and
had officially
done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion
plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the
crime scene leads at the
real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the
top secret plot.
33.
Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that
Iraq had failed to
comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441.
HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform
professional no-notice
inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..."
With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush
Administration
pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only
detrimental to an ability to
bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being
sacrificed for no better
good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will
be when they work to
bring about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the
Bush Administration
starting murdering innocent people for nothing . Well, not completely,
for Bremer shipped
19 billion to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent
back.
34.
Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went public several
weeks ago after
releasing a 19 page academic paper, essentially showing how the laws of
physics do not
support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official government
story.
It should be known that World Trade Center Building Seven was not
struck by an
airplane, yet fell exactly the same as the two towers.
Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only creatable with
the heating
by high explosives.
Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"
The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's Law of
Falling Bodies, and
also Isaac Newton's First Law of Motion.
..=2Eif we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum
temperature of 1517
degrees Fahrenheit, how could they possibly have melted this steel,
when the melting
point of steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it
becomes a molten
liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.
The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:
- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
- and the American Free Press newspaper
35.
"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public
consent to have
suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on
September 11..."
Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee
36.
The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.
At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar, Afghanistan. There
he delivered the
bluntest of demands. Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told
Taliban leader
Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and its
allies.
Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban were
reported as a
"failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite Osama without providing a
shred of eidence was
part of Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a
military intervention
which was already in the pipeline. If Osama had been extradited, the
main justification for
waging a war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold.
Nor would the ready
to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse
regarding the top
secret invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan had
been "fully
implemented"
38.
"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the
leaders of the country
who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the
people along,
whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament,
or a communist
dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to
the bidding of the
leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are
being attacked, and
denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country
to danger." --
Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War
II
39.
On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall not be a
victim, thou shall
not be a perpetrator, and thou shall not be a by-stander"
SWORN before me
in the City of Winnipeg,
Province of Manitoba,
[this affidavit was sworn in federally and provincially as a massive
Canadian Constitutional challenge]
----------------
THE QUEEN'S BENCH
WINNIPEG CENTRE
NOTICE OF MOTION
For an Order of Production
BETWEEN:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
and
JOHNNY WIZARD
Accused.
This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have
disclosed to
the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence
the Crown
holds against the accused as a member of our public. These
following
arguments are the reasons why Justice must prevail in these
proceedings:
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person
shall be
deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in
accordance with
the principles of fundamental justice."
R=2E v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general
duty to
disclose all relevant information."
In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again,
as any
legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal
cases has a
Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the
Crown's case.
Yet, in the criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to
return my
legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is
motivated by
contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by
intentionally
working to deceive our Courts through denying the evidence of one: the
charge
against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently,
and two:
that I don't already have the silent moral support of every
honorable top
secret intelligence officer this world over.
Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian
Officials in
Relation to Maher Arar"
"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are
criminal
investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists
and the
presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability
mechanism."
[Maher Arar was an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered
by the
irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing
Canadian
jurisprudence.]
Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence
the Crown
holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her
criminal
allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that
the Crown
holds any legitimacy.
It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not
giving
me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting
degrees
that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical,
hundreds of
thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.
I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter
balance the
false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to
asking where
specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she
makes her
defined as sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my
computer,
deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the
written
texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal
philosophy.
As indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense
against
fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being
compromised,
can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession
charge in
relative context to the personal life of the accused.
R=2E v. Sharpe
"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that
serves an
"educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the
purpose the
material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for
which the
possessor actually holds it."
So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be
backed
firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no
purpose. A
defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on
personal\professional
conduct to indicate actual established purpose of accused to
prevent blind
"overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep concerns of
"overreaching"
are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter.
Conduct of
individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping, who
aren't being
managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in
where the
"offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where
it's all
going as potential new innocent porno victims with millions of
dollars worth
of stuff they can get away stealing. [I've read porno cops in
America
recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid,
off of
one single server found managed in violation, but have taken a pause
before
then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for
whatever,
to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See,
perfectly
legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly
by the
weaker irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to
prove for
the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has
in her
possession all her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living
mother, a
popular working web site and historical documentations, is just
foolishly
impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized
guilty,
until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions,
they do
practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent,
they make
off like bandits. See, under a simple possession charge,
there is no
allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and
likewise,
not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of
which the
criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last thing we
want in
our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are
selling,
promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal
when the
exploitation unit comes into your home to steal your stuff by
grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.
By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which
is made
freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist,
psychologist,
concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting
on our
shared reality.
My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are
personally
responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against
innocent
children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed
American tax
paying Public, [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still
cashing in
on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of
cluster
dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our
children
indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause
irreparable
damage to North American children, or as currently, about John
DeCamp's just
released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked
national
child sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real
motivating
factor [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our
public's
right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically
because I
articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official publicly available findings
on who
orchestrated, and funded the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr.
along
with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General
Mahmoud
Ahmad.
[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has
researched the
Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be
quested for
at www.globalresearch.ca]
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm
The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily
verifiable mass
murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern
of all
children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the
betterment of
the entire public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our
public
truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own General
Hillier is
referring to get Canadian youths for sure killed over in his
nationally
broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry, against all the INNOCENT
students of
Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for
girls under
the Taliban's getting better through communicating leadership?,
and who
outlawed Bush's heroin production, and the slavery and rape of women?
Women
who were when working at the Taliban's newspaper, were not required
to wear
burkas despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would
suggest her
ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me,
for those
children's lives, and others like them, are not who she is working to
protect.
So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the
hiding
in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the light of
these
proceedings to our Honorable Lord.
The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal images,
can be
sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as
somehow, unto
it's separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my
unbridled
character. Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the
luxury and
comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant
meaning of
each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent
the Crown
argues for as a weapon of Justice. For, those personally
responsible for
making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the
evidence the
Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all
likelihood,
still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind
support of
indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal
traitor to
Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader.
While
myself, am a well documented public defender of children's
rights and a
studious observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled
in the
field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along
with the
chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who
when not
terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown's
alleged
criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US
all as
treated fairly.]]
I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another's
expressions,
of some managed images, or some strewn texts.
It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not
giving
me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting
degrees
that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical,
hundreds of
thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While
sitting
just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes
proudly
the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing
to push
US all over the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing
such an
enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true
personal self
contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our
community's
Police Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded
frustration on
my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A
honorable
defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to
concentrate on
Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well
knows, a
bushite's favored public intent is well established by the
evidence, as
documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless
through the
mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don't know
knowing any
better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor,
was any
factually alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts
unchallenged
nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the
inspectors
in to go where ever they wanted without delay. Furthermore,
indiscriminately
murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land
mines, 9000
missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000
pound bombs
containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved
napalm
and phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the
approximate age
range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed
publicly by
the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in
jeopardizing the
lives of our children for sure by working to silence my extremely rare
public
cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg.
I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and
praised
world wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe
decision
allows this defense to be made on our behalf.
By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made by
my false
accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be
claimed as
"collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my
computer,]
while judging to refuse to have returned my therefore stolen legal
property so
I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's
confusions, is
nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By
denying me
the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our Court, would create
an undue
hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage
points.
Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of
thousands
of media messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search
tools, and
a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I
know, I
have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly
nature
when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same
listening
vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content,
to spew
their boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great
George W.
Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer,
would leave
me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study
with good
coffee and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense
with the
evidence I demand the fair right to contend.
I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've
made for
near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything.
The Crown
has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if
I'm not
granted to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence
she don't
want me to have returned possession of. My legal property that the
Crown's
crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening?
I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to
surmise her
relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society.
I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions
such as
public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown's refusal to
consider
such objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is
on this
serious matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed
by our
law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while
surely as
sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know
mean a
great deal to me personally. Wishing to deprive our rights as the
community,
to be granted fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is
surely
what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably
against the
Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen property. I
need to
establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system,
so I can
establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of
Canada's
Standing Sharpe decision.
The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions
serve a
criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise
by made
available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional
challenge]
Evidence of real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court,
because
usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's stolen stuff
actually.
And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our
Police
agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the evidence
for first
degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little
Jewish
man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi
fascists under
Hitler would have too. [surprising for many, it is formally
illegal to be
Jewish currently in God's Israel. As for the Crowns in my case,
and the
Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far...
But this
innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing
for me is
just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or
bad, the
Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job
to do by
following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me
and you.
So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to
live up to
our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced
against the
un-elected dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor
criminal,
911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]]
I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument]
images to
sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively represent the
Crown's
faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture.
I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general
terms by
mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating
systems,
and through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here
considering.
I need operating script batch programs that do specific tasks
regarding
general media managements.
I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge
sharing
web communications system] is used, and how it was legally
accessed by my
specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the
greatest
collected artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when
using such
services, informations aren't found perceived until, at the very
least, they
are already in one's possession, thereby making the Crown's
standing
accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust. [those
responsible for
distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are
where the
infraction against the public's interest can be compromised,
but the
exploitation units I'm aware of seem to have little of no financial
interest
in recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry
brokered
through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.]
I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for
indicative
examples of huge disparities with what is described with the
Crown's own
relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains
regarding my
for real expressions. I need to reference my personal writings
surmising the
faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand
totals,
as such the Crown's crew alleges of legal content she'll bemoan
despairingly
of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.
If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant
to her
criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the
error of
her ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality
used to
try convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would
move that
the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts
help me
make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law,
while
communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard
speaking out
nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true
money man -
Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush's not so
secret any
longer private business partner, escaping he is from the mass
murder of
thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate
Americans.
I need to know what settings were set in place for the installed
programs to
access the internet. And a whole bunch else besides.
In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character was
at, by
indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to illustrate for our
Court,
my TRUE intent as motive on this matter.
Yours truly,
JOHNNY WIZARD
------------------------------------
THE QUEEN'S BENCH
WINNIPEG CENTRE
NOTICE OF MOTION
for the Crown to Stay Proceedings
BETWEEN:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
and
JOHNNY WIZARD
Accused.
The Validity of the Law
While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of sexually
explicit
child pornography, can have a detrimental impact on the
impressionable, being
in simple possession, does not connotate the same negative risk to the
public
body. It is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the
pictures on my
computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor,
importantly,
can digital images be perceived, until, at least, they are already
in your
possession. Under current law, as is in my case, you're already
guilty on
nothing. So, if you should see something arguably imprisoning,
you're too
late to point fingers elsewhere.
It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone throwing
through
the opened window, a closed paper bag of crack cocaine, followed
behind by an
arresting police officer, who while cuffing you hears your plead
that some
completely unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the
window,
leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for the record
"Yeah, I saw
the, left to go on his own "stranger" do it. And it's a crime in this
country
don't you know to be found in simple possession? Now, where are the
keys to
the trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit
crack head
loser?"
The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to
prove a
criminal intent to do her things.
See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of
intent to
obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a
responsible
public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content
was as
could be LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying
world is a
setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and
releasing
content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes
into your
home under false pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by
grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.
A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least, already
in your
possession. Making the standing law as it is interpreted by the
faulting
Crown, unjust. No criminal intent is alleged by my sole possession
charge,
but for by myself against the Crown's secret bushite crew for
aiding and
abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City.
An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such
materials are
expressed through distribution. Digital images of people posing as
testaments
to the beauty of being human, are not the same as expressions of
sexually
exploited children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of
seriously
cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five year prison
sentence is
being made because the Crown has made included, condemnable
interpretations of
the public's free expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not
my own.
Leaving still no made interest in understanding where these
prison term
perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew to be
legal,
originated. If the Crown's case remains standing, why shouldn't we
expect the
child exploitation units to then widely distribute as near as can be
Barely
Legal materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be
shamed as
criminal through threatened public Court proceedings regarding your
alledged
deviant private sexual thoughts? Of legal images perceived as a god
honest,
testimony of youth and beauty, being ourselves beautifully
youthful, could
leave you too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your
unseen
character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation units
distributing truly
illegal depictions, named maybe after car models, to see who could
be made
found only in simple possession of the accusers relative perception?
For, if the internationally popular woman depicted was well over
eighteen and
had her own legal website, don't matter for indictment, cause the
expert of
expert experts they have in my case, a double full time professional
computer
porno viewer, states with a complete straight face, the full
figured pubic
wisped woman, he knows nothing of, is really only ten or twelve.
You're for
sure either normal being human, or guilty of thinking their bad
thoughts
punishable with real prison sentences. As a result of course,
I'm now
demanded to divorce my life of other critically important
responsibilities, to
prove my complete innocence on these deliberately planned top secret
schemes,
they didn't want You, the public to know of. A near criminal
attempt, (as
documented by the now disclosed once top secret warrant), to silence
my cries
for the arrest of the publicly established factual 911 masterminds -
Our Mr.
bush Jr., General Ahmad, rumsfeld, myers and cheney, along with
almost the
entire senior staff of disclosed as flagrantly criminal
propaganda
proliferators, The Office of Special Plans.
The Warrant details by exclusion, a deliberate top secret plan on the
Crown's
part, a deviant anti-government plan to silence my calls for
accountability
through my world wide public addresses on the FBI answers still
surrounding
the murder of thousands of American Citizens. The Crown, as an
attempt to
undermine Liberty by thwarting me off my one chosen career path of
Universal
Speaker, and fictionalized demon slayer - leaves you instead, this
quickly
passing opportunity to stand up for the rights of another being
cheated for
real, and in so doing, we'll find together, that true freedom is
justice for
US all. Law stands strong for good reason, so too, does tyranny
rule by
censorship for false imprisonment. Do not allow my voice for
freedom's reign
to be silenced unjustly, by those who would have us falsely
believe, Bush
personally didn't do the crimes we all easily now know the evidence of.
An unjust Law enslaves all Religions, for reason is beautifully Just
through
your will to conceive, that God's interests are as naturally too,
your own
included. My commitments to equal rights for all have never
changed, and
Humanity's true commitment to defend Iraqi children to the last
cowardly
murderous thieving bushite enemy, will carry on, despite the corrupted
Crown's
attempt to stop real Justice from continuing. When one views
public
photographs of rumsfeld's un-arrested mercenary soldiers raping
an Iraqi
woman, are our rights being further violated with every passing
witness? How
about witnessing that Guantanamo's torture victim Moazzam Begg, was
running a
girl's school program with his wife under the female loving
Taliban? [You
know, Moazzam Begg, the one and same British Citizen depicted solely by
heroin
pushing donald "sexy cluster dud land mine dropper" rumsfeld, as one
of our
Lord's most dangerous criminals?]
The Crown alleges in truly contemptuous silence, she's not
interested in
defending the rights of those children, or victims of mass
murder, while
voicing publicly in Our Court, that I, am infringing on the rights of
children
somewhere else because, even though no body is perceiving the data
located
anywhere on my hard drive, it still magically constitutes a
personal
violation, on its own by itself, of an unjust law that others
have been
demonized, robbed, then falsely imprisoned on. This irrational
demand on
behalf of the Crown to Your Court, where she states her private
viewings do
not infringe on children's rights, while EVERYONE else's does somehow,
even if
you didn't see at all the picture judged as the reflecting mind of
a true
sexual deviant, is US ALL being the auto-guilty anyway, and not
firstly
innocent as it should be. See, the Judge could say to a Jury, "Your
job is
not to judge the injustice committed with these blind and broken
laws, but
that solely, did Top Cop Johnny have this one single picture on his
computer?,
and if he did, then the bushite liars who fight our systems of
accountability
through Justice to further escape real rapists, torturers, and
documented
treasonous war criminals like those who for sure committed 911, get to
put him
in Our prison for half a decade."
However this issue requires much for further study. It turns out
my two
primary accusing officers who deal with real sicko child porn every
day full
time, also support death squads against innocent families in
Afghanistan to
protect the demon lies of George W. Bush, and they'd almost tell
the jury
that too as blind devote disciples of the self hating bushmob cabal of
neo-con
peenackers, if the Crown wasn't there to forbid the truth from being
spoken.
The two abusers, the two anti-cop officers of question, lied to
me, then
censored my agreement they had their word on, then, attempted to
twist my
comments into something clearly I didn't mean.. and that's not even
the half
of it. So, don't tell me I'm being over critical of their naked
wicked evil.
If an image was an offensive act witnessed, why then is it that a
genuine
concern is not with a possible victim all the time? The shocker
to the
uninitiated in the battles of good against evil in these child
exploitation
units, is that rarely do they have a real monetary care to follow
though with
the details. - "Oh, the girl is really a woman, and the web address
on the
digital image is of a server acting completely within the confines of
our law,
nudist campers are nudist campers, and as for the beautifully naked
young girl
taking a bubble bath smiling, er.. I mean the one looking
seductive...
drat." Examples: I have many texts willfully ignored by the
Crown that
articulate irrational praise for one heinous crime against God or
another of
the un-elected neocon war wankers, that I, as a human, certainly
don't find
myself in automatic, no free thought agreement with., right? And my
objective
as Human defender isn't to censor the known criminality of the,
murder
innocent people for the war profiting bushmob liars, but to expose
the true
injustice committed against our better selves - US all dying
slavishly
censored through Our corporate international communication network of
good old
ideas left long gone dead and buried. Hammurabi's Code of Law:
it's first
sentence, of his first paragraph, the number one most important
Law as
example. - Here's the translation - The public figure blaming
someone else
for a capital offense, such as terrorist, who uses NO EVIDENCE for
PROOF, to
murder in Your name as Citizen, is the FOR SURE ENEMY, always,
EVERY TIME.
And in the next four thousand years that single law has
timelessly stood
unbroken, not one person has been capable to declare a true,
wanting
disagreement.
The corporate news mandate is to take You for granted - without any
given say
so. Our sold as sworn public defenders, CBC, CNN, et al, hold no
opinions of
our Humanity on the needless indiscriminate bombing of populated
cities, the
torturing of men women and children by un-arrested as openly
confessed
complete psychotics, the thieving of hundreds of billions from
America and
Iraq, and as such, tyrannically support [don't call us, will call
you] commi
censorship, all done in to assist the "escape" of those truly
responsible for
the crimes of 911.
When the Crown argues that disturbing images simply in your
possession
constitute an absolute evaluation of your punishable character,
while
denying\forbidding a Court to know what you do in your life with our
time is
faulted. I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense
stands I've
made for near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on
anything.
The Crown has no right to dictate what my private thoughts
are. This
insistence on behalf of the Crown on what we all perceive
individually by
judgment is determined solely by media content - is a foolish
falsehood
forwarded by Our Great Lord's, Supreme Court of Canada. Example:
Does not
the public videos of rumsfeld's, defended from YOUR LAW bushite
soldiers,
gunning down women and children running for their lives from a
mosque, or
where hundreds of unarmed defenseless families are huddled
together, then
bombed by a bushite enemy grunt, a grunt who on VIDEO TAPE, moans
itself to
orgasm when they all die as the innocent murdered with "ah.. dude"
just speak
for itself? Sure, the celebrating bushies repeatedly depicted have no
honor,
or courage, only a fascistic hatred for their fellow man - openly
thieves who
die without a fighting cause for Freedom, nor a true commitment to Law
- but I
would ask if We had a voice to cry in Your Court, what do You see
in this
corporate World that leaves my stand professionally
unworthy for
deliberations? The Crown's concern remains silent on the
DOCUMENTED and
easily verifiable murder issues, when she has her regular huddles with
a local
corporate reporter, discussing on who, from the community, was in
Our court
challenging, a sexually dysfunctional sadomasochistic label. For the
Crown to
witness and know first hand of such barbaric criminality, such as
the true
perpetrators of 9/11 found revealed by THE FBI stinger, along with the
rest of
the evidence trail that all leads directly to the Whitehouse, is a
Crown who
does not hold Canadian's freedom in check, or a care for our soldier
aged sons
and daughters conflicting near death. But to side instead, as they are
hiding
behind the honorable Crown's position, a small group of four or
five dim
blips, attempting they are to silence these calls for real freedom
for the
masses. I am a proud and honorable man who objects to furthering
bush's war
crime aims with this lifeless corporate tyranny of enslavement through
whoring
for the dark foreboding wills of Our Mr. bush Jr.. Censorship is the
tool of
tyrants, while I beckon a new light for peace by communicating.
Please, I beg
you, do not allow them to silence my objections to have us
unjustly
imprisoning myself, while bringing great hardship to my immediate
family by
denying the truth be spoken publicly in my defense on why I'm in
the Court
room, and what is documented irrespective of their spin doctoring
and label
pasting.
Where is the violation of a child's rights, specifically, when the
Crown's
crew gleefully ponder images she'll use to silence the words of Johnny
Wizard
by prison sentence? Where? No, where?
Commanding our public indignation for those who disrespect human
rights she
will use as her weapon, all the while, hidden from the jury, and the
judge, a
secret contempt for thousands of innocent murder victims
denied my
unchallenged demands for real Justice. No officer of our laws
anywhere have
found fault with my PUBLIC summation, documented fully, on who, and
how, 9/11
was truly orchestrated. A Crown stuck committed to global bushite
tyranny Vs.
a Truth seeker of the highest order. Come to the trial! Tell your
friends!
Tell your neighbors! The People vs. an overburdened unjust Crown, and
a near
treasonous national security officer, who wrote in the original top
secret
warrant nobody was suppose to see, it'd be so much easier to help bush
escape
arrest by avoiding the public accountability process entirely. The
once top
secret Johnny Wizard Warrant is freely available with most
names being
detracted, to protect the innocent until proven guilty. A traitor to
God and
Country the Crown and one National Security officer potentially is in
this top
secret bush administration conspiracy endeavor, to serve by bushite
criminal
decree up here in defenseless Canada. For as potential accessories
to first
degree mass murder, they are stuck attempting to undermine Canada's
National
Security Services, the FBI, the People, US, all to further unjustly
sacrifice,
more of our uninformed sons and daughters for further bounty, as
substantiated
real world criminal, bushite evils. I say no. Help me get public
recognition
through talk radio, take a stand for your fellow man, and help a
Jury in
Winnipeg learn of who I am, and why they are forbidden to know
what's truly
going on, and you'll be helping yourself to a better future. My
principle
allegations against George W. Bush require a qualified and adapt
security
officer no more that forty three minutes to verify. Namely, bush's
business
partner, General Ahmad funded 911's "mastermind" "ringleader" Atta,
and was
also sent, the General was, from the Whitehouse on behalf of bush
to the
Taliban stating, no evidence will be brought against Laden as the
accused,
therefore an innocent man in Christ. And, that as MSNBC reported of
the top
secret documents provided to themselves anonymously from Condoleezza
Rice's
office, George had a confidential plan at his desk on how to
invade
Afghanistan dated September 9th, 2001 that he didn't want anybody in
America
to know he was working on during his "vacation". His confessed
publicly to
MSNBC, as "fully implemented" Afghanistan strategy, demanded that
he not
pursue the true 911 evil doers, for it would upset his made
before hand,
guaranteed plan. That had soldier grunts moving out to get ready just
before
the event. All premised on blaming Laden as a terrorist without a
shred of
evidence, for a crime that hadn't yet taken place, but that
bush was
personally prepared as closing investigations on. To secure criminal
invasion
he would refuse to follow the evidence trail - and as a result - NOT
apprehend
the have to let go - falsely accused bin Laden. [cowardly soldiers who
didn't
speak up as real Patriots would have much earlier, who were ordered
to let
Laden go on his way in Torra Borra, have now all mostly fallen quietly
dead.,
by fluke mishap or something like the sort it is said.] All set in
play, this
plan of Our Mr. bush Jr's, top secretly with General Ahmad riding
gun shot,
just days before thousands of American People were still left
unaccountably
murdered. See? Mr. Bush would need such an event to happen
unhindered as a
requirement to galvanize world sentiment. Providing no evidence
substantiated
would guarantee his needed invasion for American pension thievers
Enron, and
that is exactly what HE planned, what HE did, and who HE is. Evil
is the
deceived disguised. What more do you need to know buddy?
I, armed with only the facts, demand the arrest of those who
participated in
the murder of children to protect the demon lies of George W. Bush,
while the
Crown's case, on top of alleging that the simple possession Law [no
criminal
intent to express or obtain is alleged] states a child's rights
are being
infringed on due to the content by itself, ALONE, appears ready to
fight for
disallowing a jury, to freely witness, this fishing
expedition was
intentionally started to stop me speaking my outrage that bush hasn't
been yet
arrested for committing 9/11 with General Ahmad, so according
to the
unmentionables in the no longer top secret Warrant. That this
Crown would
officially state holding our virtues while attempting to condemn me to
a long
prison sentence, shows her possible personal true contempt for the
value of
Your human life my friend. I have written extensively on defending the
rights
of children, and the psychology of sexually dysfunctional
sadomasochists, I
have studied this world to create some thing greater than average,
some thing
better than nomal, a world where all children are respected,
including those
of Iraq who have been purposefully denied safe drinking water,
because
negroponte needed to STEAL the emergency funds for his new embassy.
See?, she
would argue that those real world crimes aren't relevant to my case
in her
hands, those REAL children like perhaps your own don't concern her, nor
do the
lives of Canadians lied to by corporate command for criminal
sacrifice. The
Crown convinces us irrationally, with her only excuse being,
because the
specific broken Law she's decided to singly exercise, (with the
exclusion of
all others, like thou shall not murder,) stupidly says she can,
and you
dummies can't do anything at all about it yourself. Why? Because
you wont
speak out for anyone else's rights to be heard publicly - the
bushite enemy
trust to figure. Justice is Freedom, and to have a real concern for
another's
lost rights to freely be, is to be truly concerned with your very
own in
serious jeopardy. I wouldn't lie to you. Believing, as the
bushite do,
willfully deceitful corporate news propaganda excuses the
Bush
Administration's rampant criminality against the innocent as God is,
truly,
excuses nothing, especially if I have something to say on the
subject of
accountability.
This final Court challenge against my Freedom to be myself, that
the bush
administration attempted firstly to do top secretly, has now
been laid
publicly at our door step as a blatant threat to everyone of us as a
member of
the Canadian Public. Will you help me politely address my false
accusers on
our public airwaves? Will you help speak for freedom from tyranny
is this
question riddled, or will you deny yourself my generous helping?
The reasons why such abhorrent behaviors continue unaddressed in our
Police
Force actions will be documented fully with remedies offered during the
second
part of the third phase of the upcoming Question Period press
conferences -
press conferences running during the available down times of The Trial
of
JOHNNY WIZARD
----
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
http://la.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/2005/06/hero.mp3
http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
/ / That is a high act of treason. And it's not,
"oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have
the two documents of question. We have the
positions that were offered to the bush administration
on behalf of American intelligence. [the N.I.E.] That
was their position, the bush administration censored
that, re-wrote CRITICAL sentences. Fixed the intel. \ \
/ / Shouldn't a person have a right to face
their accuser in a court of law, if it's in "our"
name as a community that we're going to collectively
get together and deprive another their rights? their
freedoms? their liberties? \ \
anti-bush song written and performed by myself
http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/uploads/guilty_of_innocence.mp3
http://istanbul.indymedia.org/uploads/death_trap_-_a_frank_talk_on_the_=
true_nature_of_the_evil_demon_antichrist.mp3
http://istanbul.indymedia.org/uploads/thebomb.mp3
http://istanbul.indymedia.org/uploads/t-timebig8.mp3
http://www.sbindymedia.org/usermedia/audio/13/jack.mp3
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3
=20
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/forbidden-knowledge.mp3
.
|
|
| User: "Johnny" |
|
| Title: Christ's Recorded Statement to America - Christ's Recorded Statement to America |
11 Jan 2006 12:32:33 PM |
|
|
Christ's Recorded Statement to America
http://www.indybay.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3
http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3
http://hawaii.indymedia.org/uploads/looking_out_for_number_one.mp3
"Holy Christ.."
---
This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior
experiences of Muslim
fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion
[Jihad] to persecute
the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and
had officially
done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion
plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the
crime scene leads at the
real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the
top secret plot.
"If cannabis was one of the main ingredients of the ancient anointing
oil _ and receiving this oil is what made Jesus the Christ and his
followers Christians, then persecuting those who use cannabis could be
considered anti-Christ," Mr Bennett concludes.
http://www.indybay.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3
/ / You have no rights. He'll tell you who is guilty without
any evidence to form your own conclusions, and if you disagree
with him, he'll call you the enemy, the terorists who aren't
with him on his blanket assertions against God as the innocent.
he blames for crimes while shutting down criminal investigations.
that would normally persue the actual evil doers. \ \
http://newmexico.indymedia.org/uploads/2006/01/news-tunes.mp3
/ / And yet these are the guys that will fight for the demon
anti-Christ. Demanding certain people are unaccountable to
a rule a law. You know, South African death squad goons
that murder my black brothers. Bush says they can't be held
accountable to Iraqi law, and they can't be held accountable
to American law. But American tax payers are going to pay them
more than a thousand dollars a day, as a reward for being able
to think, that all super stars in America don't have the
humanity within themselves to speak in outrage on that fact
alone. \ \
---
"the new strategy must punish not only the guerrillas, but also make
clear to ordinary Iraqis the cost of not cooperating."
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/schwartz.php?articleid=3D8338
/ / This is terrorism by definition - attacking the
civilian population to get it to withdraw support from the
enemy. The change in strategy, therefore, represents the
embrace of terrorism as the principle tactic for subduing
the Iraqi resistance. \ \
DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD
http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/006455.php
/ / TALKING POINT: The illegal spying was required to
monitor "calls from very bad people to very bad people who
have a history of blowing up commuter trains, weddings and
churches"
FACT: False and false. If this were true, where is the
list of people who blew up commuter trains, weddings and
churches? Why are these monsters being hidden from public
view and why were they only "monitored" and not arrested
and deported from US soil? \ \
Naybe this is why..
/ / In addition to Gertz, other journalists who feature
prominently in the database include Seymour Hersh of The
New Yorker; author and journalist James Bamford, James
Risen of The New York Times, Vernon Loeb of The Washington
Post, John C. K. Daly of UPI, and this journalist [Wayne
Madsen]. \ \
DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/22/AR200512220=
1101.html
/ / Daschle wrote. "This last-minute change would have
given the president broad authority to exercise expansive
powers not just overseas -- where we all understood he
wanted authority to act -- but right here in the United
States[!], potentially against American citizens. I could
see no justification for Congress to accede to this
extraordinary request for additional authority.
[Congress] refused." \ \
DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD
/ / The National Security Agency, the top-secret spy shop
that has been secretly eavesdropping on Americans under a
plan authorized by President Bush four years ago,
destroyed the names of thousands of Americans and US
companies it collected on its own volition following 9/11 \ \
DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD
/ / The NSA ended up giving its raw data to then Under
Secretary of State for Arms Control John Bolton on at
least 10 different occasions since 9/11 \ \
DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD
/ / DNC Chairman Howard Dean pegged the total amount Bush
received from Abramoff at $100,000. Abramoff attended
three Hannukah receptions at the Bush White House -
Hannukah? What happened to fighting the War on Christmas?
- but Bush denies knowing him. "The president does not
know him and does not recall meeting him," said White
House spokesman Scott McClellan. \ \
DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD
/ / The President, according to Charley Savage of the
Boston Globe, issued a "signing statement" -- "an official
document in which a president lays out his interpretation
of a new law" -- in which he "quietly reserved the right
to bypass the [McCain] law under his powers as commander
in chief." \ \
DEMON BUSH IS GUILTY OF TREASON AGAINST GOD
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/framing_bin_laden.htm
/ / The Taleban offered to turn Bin Laden over to a
neutral party if the US provided any evidence to them that
he had anything to do with the 1997 US African embassy
bombings or the 9-11 attacks.
The evidence was never presented to the Taleban for two
reasons:
1=2E There was never any evidence, not even circumstantial \ \
"The future of our country is at risk. We cannot continue
on the present course."
Impeach Bush and Cheney Now!
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES
http://www.commondreams.org/news2006/0103-05.htm
/ / "The Bush Administration blocked an independent probe
into 9/11 while making fraudulent statements about the
reasons for invading Iraq, and now admits that it spies on
American citizens in disregard of legal limits. What more
does Congress need before it says enough is enough?" Ms.
Garrett added. \ \
/ / DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the
buying and selling of young women and children. While all
of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract
to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is
now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine
Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy
of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic
in women and little girls? \ \
/ / NSA lawyers advised the agency to immediately destroy
the names of thousands of American citizens and businesses
it collected shortly after 9/11 in its quest to target
terrorists in this country. \ \
/ / Saddam told the lawyers that he did not demand massive
revenge for a failed assassination attempt in 1982 in the
village of Dujail -- the basis of his current trial. He
said he just signed death warrants that judges had passed.
"I never asked about the Dujail case since I left that
place," he said. \ \
/ / Paradoxically the gravest concern the US troops in
Iraq face is not the Iraqi Resistance, but depleted
uranium, which has already killed 11000 troops
participating in the first Gulf War and disabled some
320,000, a number increasing by 43,000 a year, meaning
that soon all the US troops in the first Gulf War have
become casualties, and not only them: also their
girlfriends have been contaminated too, and their children
born with malignancies. \ \
/ / One caller, for example, said, "My father served in
Vietnam in 1961 and 1962. Is there a way he can find out
if he was exposed to Agent Orange?" The VA's response,
according to the VA memo: "He should know if they were
spreading that chemical out then. He would be the only
one to know. OK (hung up laughing)." \ \
/ / In addition to arbitrary arrests, inhuman treatment, violation
of residents' rights and the theft of their belongings they shout
upon entering towns in the Province "The army of AlHusain is here
to break the noses of the Sunnis". This is a simple indicator of
the sectarianism and hatred of such groups which was not familiar
to either Sunni or Shia Iraqis and is a further clear indicator of
the treachery of the parties that entered from beyond the borders
of the Iraqi people. \ \
/ / ABON - ABRAMOFF ARRANGED MEETING WITH BUSH FOR A FEE: Abramoff
"asked for $9 million in 2003 from the president of a West African
nation to arrange a meeting with President Bush and directed his
fees to a Maryland company now under federal scrutiny, according
to newly disclosed documents. \ \
/ / Bush told reporters after visiting wounded troops at Brooke
Army Medical Center. "I think most Americans understand the need
to find out what the enemy's thinking." \ \
/ / The International Committee of the Red Cross has noted at
least thirty locations in Basra that contain abandoned munitions
and unexploded ordnance (UXO). Most of these weapons were
abandoned by Iraqi forces, although some UXO were fired by
coalition forces. None of these sites has been secured by the
British forces occupying Basra. \ \
/ / Does anyone really believe there are thousands of legitimate
Al Qaeda targets to monitor in the U.S.? If so, just who is left
for the U.S. to allegedly be hunting in Afghanistan? The entire
Al Qaeda terrorist apparatus, and probably Hamas and the Red Army
Faction, must have moved stateside to come up with those kinds of
numbers! \ \
http://iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/57068
It did seem odd that the [bushite enemy] US forces
went into the neighborhood warning people about a
potential car bomb in the area, then used candy to
lure the children out into the open.
Using Zionist tactic, American troops bulldoze five houses in Hit.
The "Shock and Awe" Gallery=A9
http://www.marchforjustice.com/shock&awe.php
/ / "The children seem to be the most openly enthused.
They are getting a chance at a future the likes of which
would never have been possible under the oppressive
regime..." \ \
/ / Instead, DynCorp is "very disappointed in the tribunal's
ruling," and the company is considering an appeal. Is this denial
or yet another indication of where this company stands on human
slavery? If so it assuredly makes one wonder why the
Virginia-based Missing and Exploited Children organization
continues allowing its logo to be displayed on DynCorp's Website. \ \
/ /But the main question that has to be asked, and which is so
bewildering, is what it takes to get disqualified as a federal
contractor. Are lawmakers, who appropriate hundreds of millions
of taxpayer dollars to DynCorp, oblivious to the sexual outrages
tolerated by this federal contractor, and would taxpayers approve
of such enormous expenditures to a company that even appears to
excuse or protect such behavior? \ \
/ /There are many U.S. and international laws for
prosecuting torturers and all other civilian and military
criminals who commit cruel crimes. "While civilians may
not generally be tried in military courts for violating
U=2ES. laws, at least three [U.S.] federal laws provide a
means for prosecuting non-military personnel, including
[the Vice President for Torture, Bush-Cheney junta,] CIA
officials and civilian contractors, for criminal activity:
the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000;
the War Crimes Act of 1996; and the Torture Act of 2000,"
according to Human Rights First (HRF), formerly the
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights. \ \
----
Censorship is the tool of tyrants, exercised through the
irrational bush ***** thieves who fear open
communications, intelligence, because we make them look as
they truly are in the light of this day: profoundly
ignorant as the ungodly, and oh yeah, truly evil. [this
is why they volunteer as cowardly liars dying to commit
war crimes against defenseless children in Iraq and
Afghanistan as enemies to US all. All being Jesus, Allah,
Hillel, Buddha, or who have you.]
See the bushite, you kill it for America, you kill it for
Christ, you kill it for the hundreds of thousands of
innocent people that have been murdered in Your name.
Victims that the bushite boasts bombing indiscriminately,
to further steal and torture from openly. Do the right
thing by saving some innocent People their lives by
bagging a bushite for a loving Humanity that actually
really does exist. I love Humanity so much, I'd kill
bushite until every last anti-American torture supporter
was put in it's rightly grave.
By exercising your right to perceive representations of
that which is freely available, is of in itself, important
to the sociologist, psychologist, concerned parent, and of
course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our
shared reality. Perceptions of our dying world war
criminals fight by promoting censorship as our enemies to
escape found accountability.
HERO
http://houston.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
http://arizona.indymedia.org/uploads/hero.mp3
/ / That is a high act of treason. And it's not,
"oh well, but maybe it's not true.." No, we have
the two documents of question. \ \
-----------
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3
/ / You have no rights. He'll tell you who is guilty
without any evidence to form your own conclusions, and if
you disagree with him, he'll call you the enemy, the
terorists who aren't with him on his blanket assertions
against God as the innocent. he blames for crimes while
shutting down criminal investigations. that would
normally persue the actual evil doers. \ \
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3
/ / And yet these are the guys that will fight for the
demon anti-Christ. Demanding certain people are
unaccountable to a rule a law. You know, South African
death squad goons that murder my black brothers. Bush
says they can't be held accountable to Iraqi law, and they
can't be held accountable to American law. But American
tax payers are going to pay them more than a thousand
dollars a day, as a reward for being able to think, that
all super stars in America don't have the humanity within
themselves to speak in outrage on that fact alone. \ \
----
"leveraging the lives of American soldiers in that
process to be sacrificed as fodder, So all the while,
(as again Senator Kennedy told US,) bush's business
partners, these war profiteers can literally siphon
billions of dollars from the undefended American tax
payers."
"Is that an American?"
http://www.nancyredstar.com/newslinks/iraqkids.htm
/ / The biggest story [forbidden by CNN and CBC] of the Iraq
war is about the torture of Iraqi children. \ \
http://rantburg.com/index.php?HC=3D1&D=3D7/21/2005#124578
/ / We confirm that the American occupation in Iraq and its
collaborators are the real killers of the Iraqi children and
civilians in al-Musayyib and in Baghdad in the last few days.'' \ \
/ / Mr. Tice intends to report to Congress probable unlawful and
unconstitutional acts conducted while he was an intelligence
officer with the National Security Agency (NSA) and with the
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). These acts involved the
Director of the National Security Agency, the Deputies Chief of
Staff for Air and Space Operations, and the U.S. Secretary of
Defense \ \
-----
I am contacting you in hopes you will consider the threat of my
false imprisonment here in Canada, an issue that You will assist
me in gaining a fair defense from.
I am welcoming Humanity to consider becoming involved in my case,
to provide myself advice on defensive measures unknown for my lack
of experience on such legalities. Feel free to contact us at your
earliest convenience to inquire further with any questions not
remedied by this e-mail, or other obligations I must meet to
insure our help on this serious criminal matter. Feel free to
forward or publish the affidavit and two motions present in this
public notice.
These following two Motions and Affidavit I am sending you have
been filed at the Court of Queen's Bench here in Winnipeg, and
also as Constitutional Challenges. I am hoping I can interest you
in realizing that this challenge is not only important to me as a
free citizen, but also for ourselves as the concerned world
community.
[the motions and affidavit have also gone to federal offices
(Constitutional challenges) and the Provincial]
Thanks for your consideration.
Synopsis: I had been writing critically of the Bush
Administration, when, the Secret Service top secretly
requested I be arrested quietly for threatening the life
of George W. Bush. They tentatively planned to have me
arrested under the Mental Health Act to avoid a public
criminal proceeding, but however during the process, I
managed to speak convincingly to the Honorable RCMP, and
the Secret Service, along with publicly speaking on local
Manitoba radio for no less than forty hours regarding Bush
in total, and was also well known throughout my community
involvement in live acting man theatrical productions I've
been a part of for more than a decade.
-----------------
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/psychological-warfare_.mp3
http://sydney.indymedia.org/local/webcast/uploads/metafiles/t-timebig16.mp3
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/news-tunes.mp3
http://radio.indymedia.org/uploads/canadian_radio_broadcast_interview_with_=
j=2E_wizard.mp3
http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/uploads/guilty_of_innocence.mp3
/ / So, here I will offer you something I created, a Johnny
Wizard pencil drawing in jpg format. Enjoy! \ \
http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/11/119755.php
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/07/268441.shtml
/ / Instead of murdering our own families as war criminals for bush
to pilfer the undefended wallets of our grandparents, why don't we
all smarten up, and just kill the unarrested demon bush instead as
something truly Patriotic? \ \
/ / Of the many disclosures in the email exchange between the two,
this is the most intriguing. On August 13, 2004, Tomlinson wrote
Gigot: "Protect me on this. I am breaking my word by forwarding
this Mintz/Moyers stuff - but it's too rich for you not to see.
Please, please don't show it to anyone. But keep in mind as we
have fun with this. Cheers-KT." \ \
/ / The so-called international community has accepted the
eventuality of a nuclear holocaust. \ \
/ / "I absolutely confirm there were no terrorists in this house,"
police chief Colonel Sufyan Mustafa told Reuters. "Even if there
had been, why didn't they surround the area and detain the
terrorists instead?"
The Baiji strike was one of 58 air missions the U.S. military
carried out Monday over Iraq.
/ / "You can't have a corrupt lobbyist
unless you have a corrupt member (of Congress) or a corrupt staff.
This was a team effort," Gingrich told a Rotary Club lunch in
Washington on Wednesday. The implications are overwhelming. \ \
/ / Whether or not the targets were insurgents, the disregard for
the lives of civilians trapped inside the buildings demolished by
air attacks is part of a larger pattern articulated by an American
officer to NY Times reporter Dexter Filkins early in the war:
"the new strategy must punish not only the guerrillas, but also
make clear to ordinary Iraqis the cost of not cooperating." \ \
-----------------
AFFIDAVIT
AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD
I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
MAKE OATH AND SAY:
1=2E
Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer
about $100,000 to
hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in
India and confirmed
by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street
Journal, 10/10/01, AFP,
10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's
direction is Saeed
Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel
Pearl in February
2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News
they've now
tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in
Florida to accounts
held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01]
CNN also
reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it
came in 2000.
[CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order
must have
preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening
bank accounts and
receiving the money ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi
between June
19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]
2=2E
On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had
received
anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated
September 9th, 2001,
originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade
Afghanistan premised
on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up
the allegations,
thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads
innocence to a
crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify"
sacrificing American
GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving
Enron. ["The Dahbol
Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been
sufficient to
have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had
offered [as others
of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years.
CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any
follow up on the
intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere,
our public
devolvement of a just society.
3=2E
RT=C9 News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
21 September 2001 17:41
The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban
for proof that
Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to
the US Secretary
of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try
bin Laden in an
American court.
The US Government said there would be no negotiations.
4=2E
[This following document was the official damning account]
Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
4 October 2001
http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp
[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]
"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against
Usama Bin Laden
in a court of law."
The document doesn't hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?
5=2E
Investigating the Investigation
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=3D17816
After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did
the vice president
call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?"
Daschle flatly
contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan.
28 the president
himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request."
..=2E.."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr.
Bush four days
later, but "on other dates following" as well.
6=2E
ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219=
..html
Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop
investigations into a
suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and
the Sept. 11
attacks...
`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'
7=2E
October 9 2001 - The Times of India
"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that
former ISI [the
"Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement
after being
superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed
here on
Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India
produced to show his
links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade
Center. The U.S.
authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000
were wired to WTC
hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed]
at the
instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have
confirmed that
India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the
money transfer and the
role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide
details, they said that
Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the
FBI in tracing
and establishing the link."
8=2E
No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So
according to Bush's
official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself
claimed he played no
part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink
of starvation, Laden
agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC
and CNN denied
to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American
GIs. Once the
indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the
country of
Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to
defend US
innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the
clear to all fake
video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking
remotely like Laden,
but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose
is HALF as long in
proportion to Laden's for example, and surely frightfully shocking
for some, the actor
doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two
faces never aired on
CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the
Internet.
9=2E
former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill
"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil
corporate interests and
the role played by Saudi Arabia."
10.
Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von
Buelow
"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop
Al-Qaeda. They
threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he
knows."
11.
Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete
innocence
with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty."
12.
www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm?sectionID=3D14
" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the
Sept. 11 hijackers
were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She
said documents also
included information relating to their financial activities. "
13.
The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can
not be understated
as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of
Afghanistan to
save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving
Enron.
From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz
" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy
Task Force
meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be
taken to remove the
Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the
United States
controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999
and have known
since then about the Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of
contract lawsuit in US
District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the
Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500
million arbitration
settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the
United States
Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas."
14.
From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
York), 25 May 2002:
"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt]
Guckenheimer, an
assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If
there was anybody
there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there
were women and
children to kill them."
15.
Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial
Bombing of
Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"
by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire
When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village
of Chowkar-
Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least
93 civilians, a
Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted
them dead." The
reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the
Chowkar incident,
Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village."
16.
US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm
"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians
- some of whom
are entirely innocent.
And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out
from the Pentagon's
spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was
no dilemma
when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled
the trigger."
The Crown would argue this issue isn't in her jurisdiction, however,
it is in mine as a
expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An
irrational tyranny
that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and
false imprisonments.
An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to
kill God's
children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they"
knew that too?
17.
Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally
responsible for
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml
18.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B=
..htm
"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no
weapons, but that
with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran."
19.
http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=3D1872
CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating
the Internet of two
Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the
two boys who are
giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in
English that reads, "Lcpl
Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!"
(Link to photo: http://www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)
20.
Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was
frustrated"
[this story was on Bush's top secret W199i directive]
This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC
reporter no more that
thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a
national news
report on it.
21.
INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with
radiation?
SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.
INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.
SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.
"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a
river. It poisons the
grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water
table. When it gets
into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of
radioactivity and heavy
metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you
get genetic
alterations."
[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals,
oxidized to
microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been
deposited in our airspace,
however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the
scientifically measurable
extremely serious health concern issue..]
22.
Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary
power to use military
force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and
are unreviewable."
Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the
torturing of
innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush
doesn't have to justify
his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter."
23.
The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president
Bush personally
signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
(See original at
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)
24.
U=2ES. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'
"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes
and that forcing
Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal.
He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy
Massey, who is
expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30
unarmed Iraqis,
including women and a six-year-old child, at a U.S. military
checkpoint."
25.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html
that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees,
ordering Defense
Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning,
confiscating evidence
of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."
26.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml
A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly
retaliating against him
for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction to support the
White House's pre-war position.
27.
``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does,
kill people, and I
had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a
criminal war. Any act of
violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''
28.
Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light
him up!" the
sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire,
killing the unarmed
man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over
which of them had
scored Company C's first kill.
29.
It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio,
precinct that tallied
4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted.
30.
http://middleeastinfo.org/forum4970
http://wallofhate.com
Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian
[JEWISH] school girl is
about to die
"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of
about 10. She's behind the
embankment, scared to death."
"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a
three-year-old, needs to be
killed."
31.
US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery
rounds on Monday,
said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan
district said one
building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on
the neighborhood
overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's
northwest.
[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all
TRUE accounts
of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was
forbidden to leave,
exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]
32.
The Bush Administration
In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST
By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle
"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim
that the
White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations
against al Qaeda and
the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush
had requested a CIA
briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats.
And Rice's assertion
this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to
the side" appeared to be
contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the
Pentagon to begin
planning military options for an invasion of Iraq."
[ And...]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html
"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim
that the White
House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against
al Qaeda and the
Taliban."
This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior
experiences of Muslim
fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion
[Jihad] to persecute
the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and
had officially
done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion
plans, and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the
crime scene leads at the
real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the
top secret plot.
33.
Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that
Iraq had failed to
comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441.
HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform
professional no-notice
inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..."
With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush
Administration
pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only
detrimental to an ability to
bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being
sacrificed for no better
good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will
be when they work to
bring about a politic | |
