| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Pastor Steve Winter" |
| Date: |
26 Apr 2007 12:02:24 PM |
| Object: |
Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime! Charles Stanley continues to
publish malicious libel!!! I was an agent of the federal court!
I reported child porn publishers to the court and to federal
law enforcement while I was an agent of the federal court (a pro
se plaintiff in an active lawsuit). The filthy false-christian
scum Stephen Adams went so far as to try to HELP the child porn
publishing to continue by trying to derail an investigation.
Charles Stanley is again being deliberately dishonest.
Is there no depth too low for scum like Charles Stanley Adams
when they are confronted with the truth from the Bible that
exposes them as fakes?
This filthy, false-christian dirt Charles Stanley has his nerve
accusing me for reporting crime when Stephen Adams did all he
could to protect actual criminals!!!
Pastor Winter - History at http://www.prime.org/legal
--
Apostolic Oneness Pentecostal /*/ PreRapture Ministry
http://www.apostolic.biz for Bible studies (text and audio)
Have you obeyed Acts 2:38 as Paul taught in Acts 19:4-6?
http://tinyurl.com/mxu7o for trinity is antichrist sermon
.
|
|
| User: "Bible Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
26 Apr 2007 05:29:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:02:24 -0400, Pastor Steve Winter
<steve-.NO--SPAM@-prime.org> wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
Where did I declare you were guilty for reporting a crime?
You know I never said that and you are deliberately lying, Steve, in an
attempt to deflect what I had said. It's slander.
However, you were guilty of a crime
That's a dishonest snip of what I wrote so that you can attempt to
deceive people into believing that what I said was that you were "guilty
for reporting the crime".
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime in possessing those child
pornography photos."
Your sin abounds. You are a proven liar and a deceitful person. And you
wonder why you are reaping the consequences of your sins? You are a
mocker of God, Steve.
Your gospel is false. You are accursed. Your deeds are evil. Repent!
(Acts 2:38)
Quartus, a brother, but not your brother
Quartus,
Deceiver Steve is in panic mode. He has been deflecting readers away
from the truth for days now. He snips part of what was said out of
contexct and then posts a response wherein god Steve intervened on
behalf of the children and animals he used in an attempt to make
money. Then he cuts and pasts garbage to make the post long hoping
the readers will read the lies and forget the truth from above.
He is busted and has no way out; other than to admit he made a mistake
but he keeps digging his hole deeper and deeper and making himself
look more evil and deceptive than usual. His false pride and
arrogance won't let him stop trying to lie his way out of it. Steve's
power is in his lies and he counts on them being successful to feel
worthy as a disciple of Satan. When his lies don't work Satan slaps
him around and he knows what is coming if he don't keep Satan happy.
See my reply as:
No need to, it's above.
<snip garbage>
Pastor Winter - History at http://www.prime.org/legal
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rod" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
26 Apr 2007 12:30:30 PM |
|
|
Pastor Steve Winter wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime!
Steve, I still believe that you committed a crime by having
porn in your possession, both moral and legal, but thats
my belief based on your statements, that doesn't make you guilty
of it ! If you're truly not guilty then at least provide
some explanation of your actions to clarify the situation
and perhaps clear your name !
You have repeatedly done the same thing to several people
on usenet that is being done here to you, and you can
STOP it !
Charles Stanley continues to
publish malicious libel!!! I was an agent of the federal court!
In limited capacity only. I have found the federal statues
that demonstrate the limits you are under and the rules you
must abide by.
You tell US how you went about obtaining the evidence, what type
it was, and how you submitted it to the court. In return, I'll
publish the statutes that pertain to your position and you can
judge for yourself whether you are guilty or not. Agreed ?
Rod
--
"Yeah, I guess if one steps back and looks again they all are basically
the same. All are guys, all exhibit some form of mental defect, all
are somewhat pathological, and all have control issues."
Kelly Siebacke, on bigotry.......
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
26 Apr 2007 03:06:25 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:30:30 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Pastor Steve Winter wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime!
Steve, I still believe that you committed a crime by having
porn in your possession, both moral and legal, but thats
my belief based on your statements, that doesn't make you guilty
of it !
Actually, Steve just admitted to ME (alluded) that the stories are
true.
If he "possessed child porn as a legal agent of the Federal courts"
(a self-appointed pro-tem "attorney"), that means he essentially
appointed himself.
And the US Supreme Court has made it QUITE clear-- as has the US Atty
Gen -- that REGARDLESS of expressed INTENT (how are the authorities
supposed to figure out one's INTENT), the MERE POSSESSION on one's
computer of images of child porn (either kids with kids, or adults
with kids) that MERE POSSESSION, for WHATEVER reason, is a felony!
That is, a FEDERAL felony.
In the Seattle area within the past couple of years, we had a ______
(Stupid Person) who was caught with a HUGE amount of child porn (I
believe I heard MULTIPLE CDs full (quantity unspecified)
He SAID he was "collecting it for law enforcement", only catch was,
law enforcement didn't know a thing about it.
He said he was "just about to down load it all onto CDs and take it
to the cops, but they got wind of his activities (?) and busted him
with a hard drive full of the garbage!
He was interrogated at LENGTH about "why?" and it was FINALLY
concluded that
#1 he had not MANUFACTURED it (no evidence of production, no video
cameras, no evidence that he knew any of the children) and those are
the BIG crimes
#2 he hadn't distributed any of it. Only HE had the images.
IT was finally determined that the guy was just plain THAT STUPID.
He was let go with a warning, "Don't even THINK about doing this
again! Leave it to the authorities!"
And-- as I just told Steve-- just because ONE guy who's as dumb as
a brick got away with it doesn't mean the next guy (Steve) will.
And there is no indication whatever that Steve was "appointed to the
courts" by anyone but himself.
If Steve gets off criminal prosecution for at LEAST being EXTREMELY
STUPID, he'll be only the 3rd person I know of. (there were 2 cases I
know of in Seattle, one made BIG news, so I gave some detail)
Steve simply is a person who plain and simple WILL NOT LISTEN TO
ANYONE.
Pray he's not producing it, if you believe you have information
that Steve IS producing it, or if you believe he continues to Have
child porn on his computer, contact the FBI.
john w
If you're truly not guilty then at least provide
some explanation of your actions to clarify the situation
and perhaps clear your name !
You have repeatedly done the same thing to several people
on usenet that is being done here to you, and you can
STOP it !
Charles Stanley continues to
publish malicious libel!!! I was an agent of the federal court!
In limited capacity only. I have found the federal statues
that demonstrate the limits you are under and the rules you
must abide by.
You tell US how you went about obtaining the evidence, what type
it was, and how you submitted it to the court. In return, I'll
publish the statutes that pertain to your position and you can
judge for yourself whether you are guilty or not. Agreed ?
Rod
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rod" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
26 Apr 2007 09:34:52 PM |
|
|
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:30:30 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Pastor Steve Winter wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime!
Steve, I still believe that you committed a crime by having
porn in your possession, both moral and legal, but thats
my belief based on your statements, that doesn't make you guilty
of it !
Actually, Steve just admitted to ME (alluded) that the stories are
true.
If he "possessed child porn as a legal agent of the Federal courts"
(a self-appointed pro-tem "attorney"), that means he essentially
appointed himself.
And the US Supreme Court has made it QUITE clear-- as has the US Atty
Gen -- that REGARDLESS of expressed INTENT (how are the authorities
supposed to figure out one's INTENT), the MERE POSSESSION on one's
computer of images of child porn (either kids with kids, or adults
with kids) that MERE POSSESSION, for WHATEVER reason, is a felony!
That is, a FEDERAL felony.
In the Seattle area within the past couple of years, we had a ______
(Stupid Person) who was caught with a HUGE amount of child porn (I
believe I heard MULTIPLE CDs full (quantity unspecified)
He SAID he was "collecting it for law enforcement", only catch was,
law enforcement didn't know a thing about it.
He said he was "just about to down load it all onto CDs and take it
to the cops, but they got wind of his activities (?) and busted him
with a hard drive full of the garbage!
He was interrogated at LENGTH about "why?" and it was FINALLY
concluded that
#1 he had not MANUFACTURED it (no evidence of production, no video
cameras, no evidence that he knew any of the children) and those are
the BIG crimes
#2 he hadn't distributed any of it. Only HE had the images.
IT was finally determined that the guy was just plain THAT STUPID.
He was let go with a warning, "Don't even THINK about doing this
again! Leave it to the authorities!"
And-- as I just told Steve-- just because ONE guy who's as dumb as
a brick got away with it doesn't mean the next guy (Steve) will.
And there is no indication whatever that Steve was "appointed to the
courts" by anyone but himself.
If Steve gets off criminal prosecution for at LEAST being EXTREMELY
STUPID, he'll be only the 3rd person I know of. (there were 2 cases I
know of in Seattle, one made BIG news, so I gave some detail)
Steve simply is a person who plain and simple WILL NOT LISTEN TO
ANYONE.
Pray he's not producing it, if you believe you have information
that Steve IS producing it, or if you believe he continues to Have
child porn on his computer, contact the FBI.
john w
If you're truly not guilty then at least provide
some explanation of your actions to clarify the situation
and perhaps clear your name !
You have repeatedly done the same thing to several people
on usenet that is being done here to you, and you can
STOP it !
Charles Stanley continues to
publish malicious libel!!! I was an agent of the federal court!
In limited capacity only. I have found the federal statues
that demonstrate the limits you are under and the rules you
must abide by.
You tell US how you went about obtaining the evidence, what type
it was, and how you submitted it to the court. In return, I'll
publish the statutes that pertain to your position and you can
judge for yourself whether you are guilty or not. Agreed ?
Rod
Thank you John. I very seriously don't want harm to come to him
no matter how vengefull and angry I may sound at times. I would
rather that he just realize thru posts like yours that he was wrong
and correct his ways.
Rod
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 03:59:09 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:34:52 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:30:30 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Pastor Steve Winter wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime!
Steve, I still believe that you committed a crime by having
porn in your possession, both moral and legal, but thats
my belief based on your statements, that doesn't make you guilty
of it !
Actually, Steve just admitted to ME (alluded) that the stories are
true.
If he "possessed child porn as a legal agent of the Federal courts"
(a self-appointed pro-tem "attorney"), that means he essentially
appointed himself.
And the US Supreme Court has made it QUITE clear-- as has the US Atty
Gen -- that REGARDLESS of expressed INTENT (how are the authorities
supposed to figure out one's INTENT), the MERE POSSESSION on one's
computer of images of child porn (either kids with kids, or adults
with kids) that MERE POSSESSION, for WHATEVER reason, is a felony!
That is, a FEDERAL felony.
In the Seattle area within the past couple of years, we had a ______
(Stupid Person) who was caught with a HUGE amount of child porn (I
believe I heard MULTIPLE CDs full (quantity unspecified)
He SAID he was "collecting it for law enforcement", only catch was,
law enforcement didn't know a thing about it.
He said he was "just about to down load it all onto CDs and take it
to the cops, but they got wind of his activities (?) and busted him
with a hard drive full of the garbage!
He was interrogated at LENGTH about "why?" and it was FINALLY
concluded that
#1 he had not MANUFACTURED it (no evidence of production, no video
cameras, no evidence that he knew any of the children) and those are
the BIG crimes
#2 he hadn't distributed any of it. Only HE had the images.
IT was finally determined that the guy was just plain THAT STUPID.
He was let go with a warning, "Don't even THINK about doing this
again! Leave it to the authorities!"
And-- as I just told Steve-- just because ONE guy who's as dumb as
a brick got away with it doesn't mean the next guy (Steve) will.
And there is no indication whatever that Steve was "appointed to the
courts" by anyone but himself.
If Steve gets off criminal prosecution for at LEAST being EXTREMELY
STUPID, he'll be only the 3rd person I know of. (there were 2 cases I
know of in Seattle, one made BIG news, so I gave some detail)
Steve simply is a person who plain and simple WILL NOT LISTEN TO
ANYONE.
Pray he's not producing it, if you believe you have information
that Steve IS producing it, or if you believe he continues to Have
child porn on his computer, contact the FBI.
john w
If you're truly not guilty then at least provide
some explanation of your actions to clarify the situation
and perhaps clear your name !
You have repeatedly done the same thing to several people
on usenet that is being done here to you, and you can
STOP it !
Charles Stanley continues to
publish malicious libel!!! I was an agent of the federal court!
In limited capacity only. I have found the federal statues
that demonstrate the limits you are under and the rules you
must abide by.
You tell US how you went about obtaining the evidence, what type
it was, and how you submitted it to the court. In return, I'll
publish the statutes that pertain to your position and you can
judge for yourself whether you are guilty or not. Agreed ?
Rod
Thank you John.
You're quite welcome.
If you don't know my history, the first time I was molested (raped),
I was about 7. The last time, I was like 15. There were probably
half-a-dozen to a dozen incidents in between, but I don't recall.
So, if there was any doubt, I have ONE thing in my mind when I see
"child molester" in the news. "Give me a gun, leave me alone with him,
and I'll fix it."
I wouldn't give you month old dog ***** for a child molester!
One of those things I DESPISE with purple rage is someone who would
touch a child!
And I am crying yet again! It's a SORE subject to me.
I very seriously don't want harm to come to him
no matter how vengefull and angry I may sound at times. I would
rather that he just realize thru posts like yours that he was wrong
and correct his ways.
"Good luck with that!"
Frankly, between us, my money would be on the two-legged horse,
not on you / me getting through to Steve!
john w
Rod
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rod" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 08:44:13 AM |
|
|
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:34:52 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:30:30 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Pastor Steve Winter wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime!
Steve, I still believe that you committed a crime by having
porn in your possession, both moral and legal, but thats
my belief based on your statements, that doesn't make you guilty
of it !
Actually, Steve just admitted to ME (alluded) that the stories are
true.
If he "possessed child porn as a legal agent of the Federal courts"
(a self-appointed pro-tem "attorney"), that means he essentially
appointed himself.
And the US Supreme Court has made it QUITE clear-- as has the US Atty
Gen -- that REGARDLESS of expressed INTENT (how are the authorities
supposed to figure out one's INTENT), the MERE POSSESSION on one's
computer of images of child porn (either kids with kids, or adults
with kids) that MERE POSSESSION, for WHATEVER reason, is a felony!
That is, a FEDERAL felony.
In the Seattle area within the past couple of years, we had a ______
(Stupid Person) who was caught with a HUGE amount of child porn (I
believe I heard MULTIPLE CDs full (quantity unspecified)
He SAID he was "collecting it for law enforcement", only catch was,
law enforcement didn't know a thing about it.
He said he was "just about to down load it all onto CDs and take it
to the cops, but they got wind of his activities (?) and busted him
with a hard drive full of the garbage!
He was interrogated at LENGTH about "why?" and it was FINALLY
concluded that
#1 he had not MANUFACTURED it (no evidence of production, no video
cameras, no evidence that he knew any of the children) and those are
the BIG crimes
#2 he hadn't distributed any of it. Only HE had the images.
IT was finally determined that the guy was just plain THAT STUPID.
He was let go with a warning, "Don't even THINK about doing this
again! Leave it to the authorities!"
And-- as I just told Steve-- just because ONE guy who's as dumb as
a brick got away with it doesn't mean the next guy (Steve) will.
And there is no indication whatever that Steve was "appointed to the
courts" by anyone but himself.
If Steve gets off criminal prosecution for at LEAST being EXTREMELY
STUPID, he'll be only the 3rd person I know of. (there were 2 cases I
know of in Seattle, one made BIG news, so I gave some detail)
Steve simply is a person who plain and simple WILL NOT LISTEN TO
ANYONE.
Pray he's not producing it, if you believe you have information
that Steve IS producing it, or if you believe he continues to Have
child porn on his computer, contact the FBI.
john w
If you're truly not guilty then at least provide
some explanation of your actions to clarify the situation
and perhaps clear your name !
You have repeatedly done the same thing to several people
on usenet that is being done here to you, and you can
STOP it !
Charles Stanley continues to
publish malicious libel!!! I was an agent of the federal court!
In limited capacity only. I have found the federal statues
that demonstrate the limits you are under and the rules you
must abide by.
You tell US how you went about obtaining the evidence, what type
it was, and how you submitted it to the court. In return, I'll
publish the statutes that pertain to your position and you can
judge for yourself whether you are guilty or not. Agreed ?
Rod
Thank you John.
You're quite welcome.
If you don't know my history, the first time I was molested (raped),
I was about 7. The last time, I was like 15. There were probably
half-a-dozen to a dozen incidents in between, but I don't recall.
So, if there was any doubt, I have ONE thing in my mind when I see
"child molester" in the news. "Give me a gun, leave me alone with him,
and I'll fix it."
I wouldn't give you month old dog ***** for a child molester!
Please keep in mind that Steve hasn't been charged with any crime,
nor has evidence been presented that would bring him up on charges.
I have to remind myself of this, as I'm not exactly unbiased.
One of those things I DESPISE with purple rage is someone who would
touch a child!
And I am crying yet again! It's a SORE subject to me.
I'm very sorry John. You haven't been able to heal, and perhaps
it's due to you needing closure. Maybe joining one of the abuse
support groups will help. I have periodic bouts of depression
when it gets close to March 31 and Christmas, and I spend some
time talking with them. The company I used to drive for would
usually pull me off the road in the middle of march and the last
part of December and send me home for a couple of weeks each month
to talk with a counselor. I've never known many formerly abused
children that didn't think they brought on their abuse by doing
something wrong, and I hope you're one of the few that understands
that you haven't.
I very seriously don't want harm to come to him
no matter how vengeful and angry I may sound at times. I would
rather that he just realize thru posts like yours that he was wrong
and correct his ways.
"Good luck with that!"
Frankly, between us, my money would be on the two-legged horse,
not on you / me getting through to Steve!
Steve hears that which pleases him most of the time. I've tried
and failed, but I had to make some effort for my own sake.
john w
Rod
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 12:28:04 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:44:13 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:34:52 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:30:30 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Pastor Steve Winter wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime!
Steve, I still believe that you committed a crime by having
porn in your possession, both moral and legal, but thats
my belief based on your statements, that doesn't make you guilty
of it !
Actually, Steve just admitted to ME (alluded) that the stories are
true.
If he "possessed child porn as a legal agent of the Federal courts"
(a self-appointed pro-tem "attorney"), that means he essentially
appointed himself.
And the US Supreme Court has made it QUITE clear-- as has the US Atty
Gen -- that REGARDLESS of expressed INTENT (how are the authorities
supposed to figure out one's INTENT), the MERE POSSESSION on one's
computer of images of child porn (either kids with kids, or adults
with kids) that MERE POSSESSION, for WHATEVER reason, is a felony!
That is, a FEDERAL felony.
In the Seattle area within the past couple of years, we had a ______
(Stupid Person) who was caught with a HUGE amount of child porn (I
believe I heard MULTIPLE CDs full (quantity unspecified)
He SAID he was "collecting it for law enforcement", only catch was,
law enforcement didn't know a thing about it.
He said he was "just about to down load it all onto CDs and take it
to the cops, but they got wind of his activities (?) and busted him
with a hard drive full of the garbage!
He was interrogated at LENGTH about "why?" and it was FINALLY
concluded that
#1 he had not MANUFACTURED it (no evidence of production, no video
cameras, no evidence that he knew any of the children) and those are
the BIG crimes
#2 he hadn't distributed any of it. Only HE had the images.
IT was finally determined that the guy was just plain THAT STUPID.
He was let go with a warning, "Don't even THINK about doing this
again! Leave it to the authorities!"
And-- as I just told Steve-- just because ONE guy who's as dumb as
a brick got away with it doesn't mean the next guy (Steve) will.
And there is no indication whatever that Steve was "appointed to the
courts" by anyone but himself.
If Steve gets off criminal prosecution for at LEAST being EXTREMELY
STUPID, he'll be only the 3rd person I know of. (there were 2 cases I
know of in Seattle, one made BIG news, so I gave some detail)
Steve simply is a person who plain and simple WILL NOT LISTEN TO
ANYONE.
Pray he's not producing it, if you believe you have information
that Steve IS producing it, or if you believe he continues to Have
child porn on his computer, contact the FBI.
john w
If you're truly not guilty then at least provide
some explanation of your actions to clarify the situation
and perhaps clear your name !
You have repeatedly done the same thing to several people
on usenet that is being done here to you, and you can
STOP it !
Charles Stanley continues to
publish malicious libel!!! I was an agent of the federal court!
In limited capacity only. I have found the federal statues
that demonstrate the limits you are under and the rules you
must abide by.
You tell US how you went about obtaining the evidence, what type
it was, and how you submitted it to the court. In return, I'll
publish the statutes that pertain to your position and you can
judge for yourself whether you are guilty or not. Agreed ?
Rod
Thank you John.
You're quite welcome.
If you don't know my history, the first time I was molested (raped),
I was about 7. The last time, I was like 15. There were probably
half-a-dozen to a dozen incidents in between, but I don't recall.
So, if there was any doubt, I have ONE thing in my mind when I see
"child molester" in the news. "Give me a gun, leave me alone with him,
and I'll fix it."
I wouldn't give you month old dog ***** for a child molester!
Please keep in mind that Steve hasn't been charged with any crime,
nor has evidence been presented that would bring him up on charges.
I have to remind myself of this, as I'm not exactly unbiased.
Well, understand that due to some remarks from the last few days, I am
no longer "trusting you". (it's a two-way street; you don't trust me,
I don't trust you). But what I have said is "old news." It's been
posted in here before.
And Steve may well BE charged now. I believe that the authorities DO
monitor these groups, but I plan (based on what YOU have said) to
forward his ADMISSIONS the past few days to the authorities.
You and I may not know where he is; I'm betting the FBI do.
One of those things I DESPISE with purple rage is someone who would
touch a child!
And I am crying yet again! It's a SORE subject to me.
I'm very sorry John.
Thanks, but you need not be! You didn't do anything on that level
to me!
But with YOU, it's a trust issue, and I don't trust you anymore.
When I tell the truth, I expect to be believed. MANY have taken a
2nd look when I explained that I am SEVERELY bi-polar, and there are
just certain aspects of human behavior (some "dos" and some "dont's")
I simply don't get.
I only know that my comment to the girl was "out of line' because 25
people piled on me about it. I learned by "majority vote", by which
time it was too late.
You haven't been able to heal, and perhaps
it's due to you needing closure.
The only way I'll ever "get closure" is to be let loose on those who
attacked me. "Good luck with that." I said MOST of the assaults I
don't even recall, but my therapist says THAT is because most were too
painful, and my mind simply erased those memories.
"Which is fine with me!"
Maybe joining one of the abuse
support groups will help.
No, because then I'd have to talk about it on a regular basis. I
choose not to. I'd prefer to move forward, but I mentioned it to let
you know the RAGE I feel at Steve over this!
I have periodic bouts of depression
when it gets close to March 31 and Christmas, and I spend some
time talking with them. The company I used to drive for would
usually pull me off the road in the middle of march and the last
part of December and send me home for a couple of weeks each month
to talk with a counselor. I've never known many formerly abused
children that didn't think they brought on their abuse by doing
something wrong, and I hope you're one of the few that understands
that you haven't.
Most certainly not. I was not raised in a home where I felt I had
to deny it. My issue was that the trauma was so severe as a child
that-- by the time I got home from being assaulted, I had quite
literally forgotten I'd been assaulted.
I'd walk into the house, my mother and father would KNOW something
had happened to me, cut lips, black swollen eyes, bloody noses. "What
happened to YOU?" And I wouldn't know what they were talking about.
I very seriously don't want harm to come to him
no matter how vengeful and angry I may sound at times. I would
rather that he just realize thru posts like yours that he was wrong
and correct his ways.
"Good luck with that!"
Frankly, between us, my money would be on the two-legged horse,
not on you / me getting through to Steve!
Steve hears that which pleases him most of the time. I've tried
and failed, but I had to make some effort for my own sake.
If you like beating a dead horse because it feels good to YOU, go
right ahead!
I think scripture is VERY clear on "wasting your efforts" which I
believe you are doing.
I believe what you are doing is:
Well, I've told Steve 100 times, and he didn't listen. Perhaps if
I tell him 50 MORE times...
James said "tell him a time or two, and then DROP it!"
So you are officially in a sin situation (also called stubbornness
and pride) over this.
I've known him roughly 10 YEARS-- and he's NEVER been receptive to
anything but, "You're right about THAT, Steve!"
That bondage to self-- by the way -- is a symptom of demon
possession.
It's also a symptom of megalomania "The God Complex." I've known a
number of folks with The God Complex. John Hennekes seems to have it
(John H), my son's grand father has it.
john w
Rod
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 04:44:52 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
<snip>
You're quite welcome.
If you don't know my history, the first time I was molested
(raped), I was about 7. The last time, I was like 15. There were
probably half-a-dozen to a dozen incidents in between, but I don't
recall. So, if there was any doubt, I have ONE thing in my mind
when I see "child molester" in the news. "Give me a gun, leave me
alone with him, and I'll fix it."
I wouldn't give you month old dog ***** for a child molester!
<snip>
The only way I'll ever "get closure" is to be let loose on those who
attacked me. "Good luck with that." I said MOST of the assaults I
don't even recall, but my therapist says THAT is because most were too
painful, and my mind simply erased those memories.
Sad. But a clear indication of how deep your christianity goes.
Letting go and forgiving is not only bible babble but is what most say is
needed to move on.
You choose not to.
"Which is fine with me!"
Maybe joining one of the abuse
support groups will help.
No, because then I'd have to talk about it on a regular basis. I
choose not to. I'd prefer to move forward, but I mentioned it to let
you know the RAGE I feel at Steve over this!
Talking about it is the single most powerful tool people have. I've *never*
talked with a rape survivor who felt any release until they started talking.
Two weeks, two months or 40 years, they suffer until they talk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 05:08:16 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:44:52 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
<snip>
You're quite welcome.
If you don't know my history, the first time I was molested
(raped), I was about 7. The last time, I was like 15. There were
probably half-a-dozen to a dozen incidents in between, but I don't
recall. So, if there was any doubt, I have ONE thing in my mind
when I see "child molester" in the news. "Give me a gun, leave me
alone with him, and I'll fix it."
I wouldn't give you month old dog ***** for a child molester!
<snip>
The only way I'll ever "get closure" is to be let loose on those who
attacked me. "Good luck with that." I said MOST of the assaults I
don't even recall, but my therapist says THAT is because most were too
painful, and my mind simply erased those memories.
Sad. But a clear indication of how deep your christianity goes.
Letting go and forgiving is not only bible babble but is what most say is
needed to move on.
You choose not to.
#1 You don't have a clue!
#2 Kindly don't speak with such authority about a religion about
which you know NOTHING.
#3 Kindly don't talk about me or to me as if you know me.
#4 Last I was aware, I don't answer to you.
#5 The Bible (Jesus and Paul) did/does teach us how to behave. There
are also allowances for us being human.
Paul put it best, in my opinion. "Do the best you can!"
In this particular case, I quite simply "do not know how to
forgive" those who assaulted me.
And I am quite certain that God understands that.
His solution (if you ever gave it a moment's thought) might well
have been to be very sure I never encountered those people again!
They are now in God's hands, and as several pastors have pointed
out to me, God's punishment is likely to be FAR more "perfect" than
anything I could have planned or executed!
You TRULY should learn to keep your mouth closed when you know so
little about your subjects (God, the Bible, Christianity, and me)
"Which is fine with me!"
Maybe joining one of the abuse
support groups will help.
No, because then I'd have to talk about it on a regular basis. I
choose not to. I'd prefer to move forward, but I mentioned it to let
you know the RAGE I feel at Steve over this!
Talking about it is the single most powerful tool people have.
Kindly don't speak for me.
And we each react differently. For ME, I have been advised many
times to NOT talk about it.
I've *never*
talked with a rape survivor who felt any release until they started talking.
I don't recall asking for your opinion or advice. Come to think
about it, I don't recall you ever asking for MY advice!
Two weeks, two months or 40 years, they suffer until they talk.
And you ASSUME I have never talked with anyone about any of that!
Yet you have never ASKED.
Meaning, you would MUCH rather ASSUME my situation than to be an
ADULT and ASK me about it!
tsk tsk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 10:48:42 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:44:52 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
<snip>
You're quite welcome.
If you don't know my history, the first time I was molested
(raped), I was about 7. The last time, I was like 15. There were
probably half-a-dozen to a dozen incidents in between, but I don't
recall. So, if there was any doubt, I have ONE thing in my mind
when I see "child molester" in the news. "Give me a gun, leave me
alone with him, and I'll fix it."
I wouldn't give you month old dog ***** for a child molester!
<snip>
The only way I'll ever "get closure" is to be let loose on those
who attacked me. "Good luck with that." I said MOST of the
assaults I don't even recall, but my therapist says THAT is because
most were too painful, and my mind simply erased those memories.
Sad. But a clear indication of how deep your christianity goes.
Letting go and forgiving is not only bible babble but is what most
say is needed to move on.
You choose not to.
#1 You don't have a clue!
Actually I have dozens and dozens of clues, both from training and speaking
with a large number of abused women.
#2 Kindly don't speak with such authority about a religion about
which you know NOTHING.
I'm not sure what religion you are talking about but I do know quite a bit
about many forms of christianity and most of them say you should forgive and
not kill.
#3 Kindly don't talk about me or to me as if you know me.
#4 Last I was aware, I don't answer to you.
Nobody asked you to. You made statements which anyone involved in any type
of counseling will not agree with.
#5 The Bible (Jesus and Paul) did/does teach us how to behave. There
are also allowances for us being human.
Paul put it best, in my opinion. "Do the best you can!"
So listen to Paul and ignore Christ. But don't tell people that it is
important to become christlike as you are actively denying it.
In this particular case, I quite simply "do not know how to
forgive" those who assaulted me.
Which, then makes you more a villian, you allegedly know how but still want
to kill them.
How christian.
And I am quite certain that God understands that.
His solution (if you ever gave it a moment's thought) might well
have been to be very sure I never encountered those people again!
A loving god would have made sure it did not happen in the first place. If
it can do one, it can do the other.
They are now in God's hands, and as several pastors have pointed
out to me, God's punishment is likely to be FAR more "perfect" than
anything I could have planned or executed!
You TRULY should learn to keep your mouth closed when you know so
little about your subjects (God, the Bible, Christianity, and me)
We've been down this road before and it is the reason I'm here. None of you
seem to be able to answer the question I put to Jason.
"Which is fine with me!"
Maybe joining one of the abuse
support groups will help.
No, because then I'd have to talk about it on a regular basis. I
choose not to. I'd prefer to move forward, but I mentioned it to let
you know the RAGE I feel at Steve over this!
Talking about it is the single most powerful tool people have.
Kindly don't speak for me.
And we each react differently. For ME, I have been advised many
times to NOT talk about it.
Not by any legitimate counselor I've met or read about.
I've *never*
talked with a rape survivor who felt any release until they started
talking.
I don't recall asking for your opinion or advice. Come to think
about it, I don't recall you ever asking for MY advice!
I don't recall being asked and certainly would not ask advice from you.
Two weeks, two months or 40 years, they suffer until they talk.
And you ASSUME I have never talked with anyone about any of that!
Yet you have never ASKED.
Meaning, you would MUCH rather ASSUME my situation than to be an
ADULT and ASK me about it!
tsk tsk
I can only respond to what you write and if you are not writing the truth,
that's your problem.
The simple solution as I have stated before is to ignore what I write.
I will use and or reproduce all or part of this alleged article as I see fit
and without requesting permission from John Weatherly.
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 11:21:22 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:48:42 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:44:52 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
<snip>
You're quite welcome.
If you don't know my history, the first time I was molested
(raped), I was about 7. The last time, I was like 15. There were
probably half-a-dozen to a dozen incidents in between, but I don't
recall. So, if there was any doubt, I have ONE thing in my mind
when I see "child molester" in the news. "Give me a gun, leave me
alone with him, and I'll fix it."
I wouldn't give you month old dog ***** for a child molester!
<snip>
The only way I'll ever "get closure" is to be let loose on those
who attacked me. "Good luck with that." I said MOST of the
assaults I don't even recall, but my therapist says THAT is because
most were too painful, and my mind simply erased those memories.
Sad. But a clear indication of how deep your christianity goes.
Letting go and forgiving is not only bible babble but is what most
say is needed to move on.
You choose not to.
#1 You don't have a clue!
Actually I have dozens and dozens of clues,
Let me be more direct, then, more to the point. So that even YOU get
it! I wasn't referring to "dozens and dozens" of women when I said
"you don't have a clue!"
I was saying "You don't have a clue" about ME!
both from training and speaking
with a large number of abused women.
#2 Kindly don't speak with such authority about a religion about
which you know NOTHING.
I'm not sure what religion you are talking about but I do know quite a bit
about many forms of christianity and most of them say you should forgive and
not kill.
"Many forms" does not include the churches I grew up in.
AND AGAIN, as a non-Christian, you can only form "your best" / or
"your worst" impression from the outside!
If you have never eaten a roasted turkey in your life, and you are
WATCHING others eat it at Thanksgiving, you can't testify about how it
actually TASTES. The best you can do is INTERVIEW, and give your
impressions from what you HEAR.
Your EARS do not TASTE.
In the same way, having no SPIRITUAL life, you can only "best
guess."
#3 Kindly don't talk about me or to me as if you know me.
#4 Last I was aware, I don't answer to you.
Nobody asked you to.
Yet you give the impression that you know me, and you know what I
believe, and you can therefore speak to what I should do, what I have
done, what will happen, what will not, what's best.
You know NOTHING about my relationship with God; and each Christian
has a UNIQUE relationship with God1
You made statements which anyone involved in any type
of counseling will not agree with.
That's amusing! Since you don't know the half-dozen therapists I've
seen over the past 10 years!
#5 The Bible (Jesus and Paul) did/does teach us how to behave. There
are also allowances for us being human.
Paul put it best, in my opinion. "Do the best you can!"
So listen to Paul and ignore Christ.
What CRAP! Paul did not contradict Jesus!
I have said many times-- as a scholar (student)-- and the scholars
I've studied with have MARVELED and I have taught them.
Jesus gave us the OUTLINE. Paul filled in the blanks.
If one TRULY "gets" Jesus, and if one TRULY GETS Paul's teachings,
there are no conflicts, no contradictions!
AGAIN, as a NON-Christian, kindly don't tell me what Christianity---
Jesus or Peter or Paul or Timothy, or Matthew or Mark or Luke or John
taught!
But don't tell people that it is
important to become christlike as you are actively denying it.
AGAIN, you pretend to know! You don't!
In this particular case, I quite simply "do not know how to
forgive" those who assaulted me.
Which, then makes you more a villian, you allegedly know how but still want
to kill them.
Oh, aren't you CLEVER!
(no, you are not. You are simply a feeble-minded, twisted JERK who
must always appear MORE clever than your adversary, and ALWAYS have
The Last Word! )
The ploy of middle schoolers!
How christian.
And I am quite certain that God understands that.
His solution (if you ever gave it a moment's thought) might well
have been to be very sure I never encountered those people again!
A loving god would have made sure it did not happen in the first place. If
it can do one, it can do the other.
They are now in God's hands, and as several pastors have pointed
out to me, God's punishment is likely to be FAR more "perfect" than
anything I could have planned or executed!
You TRULY should learn to keep your mouth closed when you know so
little about your subjects (God, the Bible, Christianity, and me)
We've been down this road before and it is the reason I'm here. None of you
seem to be able to answer the question I put to Jason.
??????? Is there some invisible compulsion I am not aware of to
"answer your questions"!!! ?
" I Do Not Answer To You! "
"Which is fine with me!"
Maybe joining one of the abuse
support groups will help.
No, because then I'd have to talk about it on a regular basis. I
choose not to. I'd prefer to move forward, but I mentioned it to let
you know the RAGE I feel at Steve over this!
Talking about it is the single most powerful tool people have.
Kindly don't speak for me.
And we each react differently. For ME, I have been advised many
times to NOT talk about it.
Not by any legitimate counselor I've met or read about.
Yawn! And of course, Mike Painter is The Recognized Authority
On All Matters He Deems Worthy Of His Attention!
************* < ------- Gold Stars!
I DO wonder how many of YOUR experts (*including YOU), have read my
particular case history!
(none)
john w
snip
You have used up your 5 seconds.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
29 Apr 2007 10:03:52 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:48:42 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:44:52 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
<snip>
Sad. But a clear indication of how deep your christianity goes.
Letting go and forgiving is not only bible babble but is what most
say is needed to move on.
You choose not to.
#1 You don't have a clue!
Actually I have dozens and dozens of clues,
Let me be more direct, then, more to the point. So that even YOU get
it! I wasn't referring to "dozens and dozens" of women when I said
"you don't have a clue!"
I was saying "You don't have a clue" about ME!
Then you should have said that. You are the writer remember?
You told us so, but can't seem to remember to tell us what.
both from training and speaking
with a large number of abused women.
#2 Kindly don't speak with such authority about a religion about
which you know NOTHING.
I'm not sure what religion you are talking about but I do know quite
a bit about many forms of christianity and most of them say you
should forgive and not kill.
"Many forms" does not include the churches I grew up in.
AND AGAIN, as a non-Christian, you can only form "your best" / or
"your worst" impression from the outside!
Which is usually quite valid.
If you have never eaten a roasted turkey in your life, and you are
WATCHING others eat it at Thanksgiving, you can't testify about how it
actually TASTES. The best you can do is INTERVIEW, and give your
impressions from what you HEAR.
Your EARS do not TASTE.
In the same way, having no SPIRITUAL life, you can only "best
guess."
Ah, the Scotsman speaks. The same argument you apply to me you and the
others apply freely to each other.
Only you have a "real" spiritual life and the others don't - unless you say
so.
If I have never tasted a turkey, I can only talk about what others say about
the taste.
If 20,000 different people give 20,000 different opinions about it, I can
only say that 19,999 *are* wrong and 20,000 may be wrong, especially when
they claim they are right and the others wrong..
#3 Kindly don't talk about me or to me as if you know me.
#4 Last I was aware, I don't answer to you.
Nobody asked you to.
Yet you give the impression that you know me, and you know what I
believe, and you can therefore speak to what I should do, what I have
done, what will happen, what will not, what's best.
You know NOTHING about my relationship with God; and each Christian
has a UNIQUE relationship with God1
I comment on my experience and what you say. If you can't write clearly you
should practice more.
You made statements which anyone involved in any type
of counseling will not agree with.
That's amusing! Since you don't know the half-dozen therapists I've
seen over the past 10 years!
Here is an example of your inability to say what you mean.
Did all ten of those people advise you not to talk about your problem?
If so, what were you doing there since talking about problems is why people
go to councilors in the first place?
Did half of them say not to talk about it?
Maybe just the last one took your money and talked about baseball.
#5 The Bible (Jesus and Paul) did/does teach us how to behave.
There are also allowances for us being human.
Paul put it best, in my opinion. "Do the best you can!"
So listen to Paul and ignore Christ.
What CRAP! Paul did not contradict Jesus!
Christ said turn the other cheek and forgive. Love everybody, go the extra
mile.
He did not say that you should only do the best you can, he said do it.
But of course you are entitled to your opinion, who cares what the bible
says right?
I have said many times-- as a scholar (student)-- and the scholars
I've studied with have MARVELED and I have taught them.
Your scholarship ranks right up there with BB, BJ, and karl.
Jesus gave us the OUTLINE. Paul filled in the blanks.
If one TRULY "gets" Jesus, and if one TRULY GETS Paul's teachings,
there are no conflicts, no contradictions!
AGAIN, as a NON-Christian, kindly don't tell me what Christianity---
Jesus or Peter or Paul or Timothy, or Matthew or Mark or Luke or John
taught!
Right only the True Christian can know and I suspect he is not here today.
But don't tell people that it is
important to become christlike as you are actively denying it.
AGAIN, you pretend to know! You don't!
In this particular case, I quite simply "do not know how to
forgive" those who assaulted me.
Which, then makes you more a villian, you allegedly know how but
still want to kill them.
Oh, aren't you CLEVER!
(no, you are not. You are simply a feeble-minded, twisted JERK who
must always appear MORE clever than your adversary, and ALWAYS have
The Last Word! )
The ploy of middle schoolers!
There is a simple solution and I have suggested it many times.
Stop responding.
How christian.
And I am quite certain that God understands that.
His solution (if you ever gave it a moment's thought) might well
have been to be very sure I never encountered those people again!
A loving god would have made sure it did not happen in the first
place. If it can do one, it can do the other.
They are now in God's hands, and as several pastors have pointed
out to me, God's punishment is likely to be FAR more "perfect" than
anything I could have planned or executed!
You TRULY should learn to keep your mouth closed when you know so
little about your subjects (God, the Bible, Christianity, and me)
We've been down this road before and it is the reason I'm here. None
of you seem to be able to answer the question I put to Jason.
??????? Is there some invisible compulsion I am not aware of to
"answer your questions"!!! ?
" I Do Not Answer To You! "
Which as most people know is not the same as "I do not answer."
"Which is fine with me!"
Maybe joining one of the abuse
support groups will help.
No, because then I'd have to talk about it on a regular basis. I
choose not to. I'd prefer to move forward, but I mentioned it to
let you know the RAGE I feel at Steve over this!
Talking about it is the single most powerful tool people have.
Kindly don't speak for me.
And we each react differently. For ME, I have been advised many
times to NOT talk about it.
Not by any legitimate counselor I've met or read about.
Yawn! And of course, Mike Painter is The Recognized Authority
On All Matters He Deems Worthy Of His Attention!
************* < ------- Gold Stars!
I DO wonder how many of YOUR experts (*including YOU), have read my
particular case history!
(none)
You present anechdotal stories about yourself and how special you are.
The evidence speaks otherwise.
john w
snip
You have used up your 5 seconds.
My but you must be a fast reader.
I suggest you stop responding to me.
I will use and or reproduce all or part of this alleged article as I see fit
and without requesting permission from John Weatherly.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
28 Apr 2007 10:51:07 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:21:22 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:
x-no-archive: I wouldn't count on that!! :o)
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights undeserved; every portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the idiot calling himself an 'author'.
I was saying "You don't have a clue" about ME!
YOUR problem is, many of us DO have much more than just 'a clue'
about 'you'... so does the FBI, and the Canadian Police.
ALL for good reason, I might add.
#3 Kindly don't talk about me or to me as if you know me.
We ALL know you by your insanity in here and elsewhere.
#4 Last I was aware, I don't answer to you.
You think you don't answer, but every time you >REPLY< you do,
idiot.
Yet you give the impression that you know me, and you know what I
believe, and you can therefore speak to what I should do, what I have
done, what will happen, what will not, what's best.
What is best for you is to contact your nearest Mental Health
facility.
That's amusing! Since you don't know the half-dozen therapists I've
seen over the past 10 years!
Obviously, none of 'em have done you any good.
The fact is, you need to see a competent PSYCHIATRIST.
I have said many times-- as a scholar (student)-- and the scholars
I've studied with have MARVELED and I have taught them.
MORE senseless blowing and bragging, we see......
ALL part of the pattern, John... ALL part of it.
Oh, aren't you CLEVER!
(no, you are not. You are simply a feeble-minded, twisted JERK who
must always appear MORE clever than your adversary, and ALWAYS have
The Last Word! )
The ploy of middle schoolers!
Go to your room, take your meds, and calm yourself. This is
ridiculous, and you only succeed in making yourself look all the more
foolish.
" I Do Not Answer To You! "
YOU JUST DID.
You have used up your 5 seconds.
^^^^^^^^more childishness duly noted.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 06:19:45 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:08:16 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:
God's punishment is likely to be FAR more "perfect" than
anything I could have planned or executed!
Then explain WHY you continually post your idle threats to so many
people, liar-johnnie?
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 11:01:57 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:19:45 -0400, wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:08:16 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:
God's punishment is likely to be FAR more "perfect" than
anything I could have planned or executed!
Then explain WHY you continually post your idle threats to so many
people, liar-johnnie?
I have decided to stop communicating with you when you are in your
vehement, hate phase which is most of the time.
When you can find a civil tone, get back to me.
YOU may find this "liar-johnnie" crap "cutesy". But it's CRAP, and
you know it! You use it in a VAIN attempt to "keep your adversary
down." You are simply too DAMNED stupid to figure out, it isn't
working, it never has; it never will!
I suppose psycho control freaks such as yourself figure "better bad
attention than none!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
28 Apr 2007 02:49:36 PM |
|
|
In <klh533l332i24caamqds91mf9b49lgactj@4ax.com>, on 04/27/07
at 09:01 PM, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> the following lie in progress
[having been repeated since about 2000] is being interrupted so the truth
of the matter can be shared.
Path:
free.teranews.com!sam.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!zeus.nntpserver.com!news.glorb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-01.inet.qwest.net!news.qwest.net!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups:
free.christians,alt.christnet.public,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.christian.pentecostal
Subject: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers.
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:01:57 -0700
Message-ID: <klh533l332i24caamqds91mf9b49lgactj@4ax.com>
References: <Leidnccw4_NFXa3bnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@giganews.com>
<jgm133tcu8svegcav6t5g9i2hlatpe219m@4ax.com>
<1331o8m8i6gog0b@corp.supernews.com>
<a11233hnohtses4k0onksdes8ivoq45da2@4ax.com>
<1332o5d8kt2or69@corp.supernews.com>
<cie3335i1nqv90uuan66akgmodfnqg4c6b@4ax.com>
<1333vcgd5ccra03@corp.supernews.com>
<m0c433he0eg6c83av4tlujjt5gf9mchha5@4ax.com>
<j8uYh.1840$uJ6.682@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net>
<2ns433hmd37qpo6g7ecb84ifqicb5e7nev@4ax.com>
<s71533lu532h2rluveqqu8o8301fi3c0vd@4ax.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent
2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 28
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation
NNTP-Posting-Host: 326b3bce.news.qwest.net
X-Trace:
DXC=@DabZ8K>V1GhE@OL<X7fSGF85SKJoGf>D^ZS^19Dc3NCm=:Gl@1G7nHF85SKJoGf>Do]`1G3eRIlCZn2bmZ5h@jIb^b[b0\3GcL
X-Complaints-To:
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:19:45 -0400, wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post may
be used anywhere else without written permission of the author. >On Fri,
27 Apr 2007 15:08:16 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> >wrote:
God's punishment is likely to be FAR more "perfect" than
anything I could have planned or executed!
Then explain WHY you continually post your idle threats to so many
people, liar-johnnie?
I have decided to stop communicating with you when you are in your
vehement, hate phase which is most of the time.
Translation, you can't hide the obvious so you will pretend to have the
moral high ground & for a change, act like a man.
When you can find a civil tone, get back to me.
Now why would anyone with an ounce of self respect want to get *back to
you*? it's not as if attempting to communicate with you is something to be
looked forward too, now is it.
YOU may find this "liar-johnnie" crap "cutesy". But it's CRAP, and you
It's not Cutesy, it's accurate. isn't that right Sargent, retied USAF.
know it! You use it in a VAIN attempt to "keep your adversary down." You
No one can keep you down as well as you do it.
are simply too DAMNED stupid to figure out, it isn't working, it never
Speaking about someone being too damned stupid, have you realised no one
is buying your innocent injured act anymore?
has; it never will!
No, your blustering has never worked. It seems to be the only trick you
have, but it does not work anymore.
I suppose psycho control freaks such as yourself figure "better bad
attention than none!"
You should know, after all, You Are the original Attention ***** of the
Baptist group.
which wannabe this time johhnniiee, the one that thinks just because it
believes its lies, everyone else must?
walksalone who suspects that should they ever require a face to put with
the word liar, Johnny will be a shoo-in.
Camels and Christians receive their burdens kneeling.
-- Ambrose Bierce, quoted from James A. Haught, ed., 2000 Years of
Disbelief
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ujb" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
28 Apr 2007 07:32:34 AM |
|
|
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:19:45 -0400, wrote:
=A9 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post=
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:08:16 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:
God's punishment is likely to be FAR more "perfect" than
anything I could have planned or executed!
Then explain WHY you continually post your idle threats to so many
people, liar-johnnie?
=20
=20
I have decided to stop communicating with you when you are in your
vehement, hate phase which is most of the time.
=20
When you can find a civil tone, get back to me.
=20
YOU may find this "liar-johnnie" crap "cutesy". But it's CRAP, and
you know it! You use it in a VAIN attempt to "keep your adversary
down." You are simply too DAMNED stupid to figure out, it isn't
working, it never has; it never will!
Good job Doc, it's working, *we* all can see it now. Keep heaping on the =
truth.
I suppose psycho control freaks such as yourself figure "better bad
attention than none!"
It's working Doc!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 04:11:42 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:28:04 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:
I believe that the authorities DO monitor these groups
You BET they do.
And -- for good reason.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rod" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 07:40:10 PM |
|
|
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:44:13 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:34:52 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:30:30 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Pastor Steve Winter wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime!
Steve, I still believe that you committed a crime by having
porn in your possession, both moral and legal, but thats
my belief based on your statements, that doesn't make you guilty
of it !
Actually, Steve just admitted to ME (alluded) that the stories are
true.
If he "possessed child porn as a legal agent of the Federal courts"
(a self-appointed pro-tem "attorney"), that means he essentially
appointed himself.
And the US Supreme Court has made it QUITE clear-- as has the US Atty
Gen -- that REGARDLESS of expressed INTENT (how are the authorities
supposed to figure out one's INTENT), the MERE POSSESSION on one's
computer of images of child porn (either kids with kids, or adults
with kids) that MERE POSSESSION, for WHATEVER reason, is a felony!
That is, a FEDERAL felony.
In the Seattle area within the past couple of years, we had a ______
(Stupid Person) who was caught with a HUGE amount of child porn (I
believe I heard MULTIPLE CDs full (quantity unspecified)
He SAID he was "collecting it for law enforcement", only catch was,
law enforcement didn't know a thing about it.
He said he was "just about to down load it all onto CDs and take it
to the cops, but they got wind of his activities (?) and busted him
with a hard drive full of the garbage!
He was interrogated at LENGTH about "why?" and it was FINALLY
concluded that
#1 he had not MANUFACTURED it (no evidence of production, no video
cameras, no evidence that he knew any of the children) and those are
the BIG crimes
#2 he hadn't distributed any of it. Only HE had the images.
IT was finally determined that the guy was just plain THAT STUPID.
He was let go with a warning, "Don't even THINK about doing this
again! Leave it to the authorities!"
And-- as I just told Steve-- just because ONE guy who's as dumb as
a brick got away with it doesn't mean the next guy (Steve) will.
And there is no indication whatever that Steve was "appointed to the
courts" by anyone but himself.
If Steve gets off criminal prosecution for at LEAST being EXTREMELY
STUPID, he'll be only the 3rd person I know of. (there were 2 cases I
know of in Seattle, one made BIG news, so I gave some detail)
Steve simply is a person who plain and simple WILL NOT LISTEN TO
ANYONE.
Pray he's not producing it, if you believe you have information
that Steve IS producing it, or if you believe he continues to Have
child porn on his computer, contact the FBI.
john w
If you're truly not guilty then at least provide
some explanation of your actions to clarify the situation
and perhaps clear your name !
You have repeatedly done the same thing to several people
on usenet that is being done here to you, and you can
STOP it !
Charles Stanley continues to
publish malicious libel!!! I was an agent of the federal court!
In limited capacity only. I have found the federal statues
that demonstrate the limits you are under and the rules you
must abide by.
You tell US how you went about obtaining the evidence, what type
it was, and how you submitted it to the court. In return, I'll
publish the statutes that pertain to your position and you can
judge for yourself whether you are guilty or not. Agreed ?
Rod
Thank you John.
You're quite welcome.
If you don't know my history, the first time I was molested (raped),
I was about 7. The last time, I was like 15. There were probably
half-a-dozen to a dozen incidents in between, but I don't recall.
So, if there was any doubt, I have ONE thing in my mind when I see
"child molester" in the news. "Give me a gun, leave me alone with him,
and I'll fix it."
I wouldn't give you month old dog ***** for a child molester!
Please keep in mind that Steve hasn't been charged with any crime,
nor has evidence been presented that would bring him up on charges.
I have to remind myself of this, as I'm not exactly unbiased.
Well, understand that due to some remarks from the last few days, I am
no longer "trusting you". (it's a two-way street; you don't trust me,
I don't trust you). But what I have said is "old news." It's been
posted in here before.
And Steve may well BE charged now. I believe that the authorities DO
monitor these groups, but I plan (based on what YOU have said) to
forward his ADMISSIONS the past few days to the authorities.
You and I may not know where he is; I'm betting the FBI do.
One of those things I DESPISE with purple rage is someone who would
touch a child!
And I am crying yet again! It's a SORE subject to me.
I'm very sorry John.
Thanks, but you need not be! You didn't do anything on that level
to me!
But with YOU, it's a trust issue, and I don't trust you anymore.
When I tell the truth, I expect to be believed. MANY have taken a
2nd look when I explained that I am SEVERELY bi-polar, and there are
just certain aspects of human behavior (some "dos" and some "dont's")
I simply don't get.
I only know that my comment to the girl was "out of line' because 25
people piled on me about it. I learned by "majority vote", by which
time it was too late.
You haven't been able to heal, and perhaps
it's due to you needing closure.
The only way I'll ever "get closure" is to be let loose on those who
attacked me. "Good luck with that." I said MOST of the assaults I
don't even recall, but my therapist says THAT is because most were too
painful, and my mind simply erased those memories.
"Which is fine with me!"
Maybe joining one of the abuse
support groups will help.
No, because then I'd have to talk about it on a regular basis. I
choose not to. I'd prefer to move forward, but I mentioned it to let
you know the RAGE I feel at Steve over this!
AS far as I can determine, Steve hasn't been charged with anything
other than being a headache, and that isn't a crime. Steve is innocent
until proven guilty, and we all can be glad for that.
I have periodic bouts of depression
when it gets close to March 31 and Christmas, and I spend some
time talking with them. The company I used to drive for would
usually pull me off the road in the middle of march and the last
part of December and send me home for a couple of weeks each month
to talk with a counselor. I've never known many formerly abused
children that didn't think they brought on their abuse by doing
something wrong, and I hope you're one of the few that understands
that you haven't.
Most certainly not. I was not raised in a home where I felt I had
to deny it. My issue was that the trauma was so severe as a child
that-- by the time I got home from being assaulted, I had quite
literally forgotten I'd been assaulted.
I'd walk into the house, my mother and father would KNOW something
had happened to me, cut lips, black swollen eyes, bloody noses. "What
happened to YOU?" And I wouldn't know what they were talking about.
I very seriously don't want harm to come to him
no matter how vengeful and angry I may sound at times. I would
rather that he just realize thru posts like yours that he was wrong
and correct his ways.
"Good luck with that!"
Frankly, between us, my money would be on the two-legged horse,
not on you / me getting through to Steve!
Steve hears that which pleases him most of the time. I've tried
and failed, but I had to make some effort for my own sake.
If you like beating a dead horse because it feels good to YOU, go
right ahead!
I think scripture is VERY clear on "wasting your efforts" which I
believe you are doing.
I believe what you are doing is:
Well, I've told Steve 100 times, and he didn't listen. Perhaps if
I tell him 50 MORE times...
James said "tell him a time or two, and then DROP it!"
So you are officially in a sin situation (also called stubbornness
and pride) over this.
I've known him roughly 10 YEARS-- and he's NEVER been receptive to
anything but, "You're right about THAT, Steve!"
That bondage to self-- by the way -- is a symptom of demon
possession.
It's also a symptom of megalomania "The God Complex." I've known a
number of folks with The God Complex. John Hennekes seems to have it
(John H), my son's grand father has it.
And probably all the Caesars, Caligula and Tiberius certainly had it,
as for demon possession in Steve's case, well.......who is really
possessing whom, eh ? Steve is likely pretty hard on any demon
trapped in his body !
Rod
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Charles Stanley defends child porn publishers. |
27 Apr 2007 11:09:24 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:40:10 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:44:13 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:34:52 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
john w <johnw wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:30:30 -0500, Rod <kc0oeb@cableone.net> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
Pastor Steve Winter wrote:
"Quartus, a brother to Stephen Adams"
<quartus_a_brother@yahoo.com> spake thusly and wrote:
Here's what I wrote:
"However, you were guilty of a crime
The false-christian scum Charles Stanley declares the publishers
of child porn to be innocent and declares me to be guilty for
reporting the crime!!!
I was not guilty of any crime!
Steve, I still believe that you committed a crime by having
porn in your possession, both moral and legal, but thats
my belief based on your statements, that doesn't make you guilty
of it !
Actually, Steve just admitted to ME (alluded) that the stories are
true.
If he "possessed child porn as a legal agent of the Federal courts"
(a self-appointed pro-tem "attorney"), that means he essentially
appointed himself.
And the US Supreme Court has made it QUITE clear-- as has the US Atty
Gen -- that REGARDLESS of expressed INTENT (how are the authorities
supposed to figure out one's INTENT), the MERE POSSESSION on one's
computer of images of child porn (either kids with kids, or adults
with kids) that MERE POSSESSION, for WHATEVER reason, is a felony!
That is, a FEDERAL felony.
In the Seattle area within the past couple of years, we had a ______
(Stupid Person) who was caught with a HUGE amount of child porn (I
believe I heard MULTIPLE CDs full (quantity unspecified)
He SAID he was "collecting it for law enforcement", only catch was,
law enforcement didn't know a thing about it.
He said he was "just about to down load it all onto CDs and take it
to the cops, but they got wind of his activities (?) and busted him
with a hard drive full of the garbage!
He was interrogated at LENGTH about "why?" and it was FINALLY
concluded that
#1 he had not MANUFACTURED it (no evidence of production, no video
cameras, no evidence that he knew any of the children) and those are
the BIG crimes
#2 he hadn't distributed any of it. Only HE had the images.
IT was finally determined that the guy was just plain THAT STUPID.
He was let go with a warning, "Don't even THINK about doing this
again! Leave it to the authorities!"
And-- as I just told Steve-- just because ONE guy who's as dumb as
a brick got away with it doesn't mean the next guy | | | | | | | | |