Religions > Bible > Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Peace Crusader" |
| Date: |
30 Jan 2006 02:09:17 AM |
| Object: |
Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
My Dear Fellowmen,
The following is from the webpage
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/findings.htm. These are the
notable findings that were discovered or confirmed after proving the
the revelation of the Holy Spirit that Jesus was crucified on August
17, 1 BC is correct.
=========================================
NOTABLE FINDINGS
The Holy Spirit revealed that Jesus Christ was crucified and died on
August 17. The first time I heard this was in 1983 from earlier
listeners of the Holy Spirit. I guess they assumed that the year was
33 AD or thereabout. However, later, from one session which is called
"Panambitan" or "Pleading", I deduced that the year was 1 BC.
I did not know how it could be August 17, more so, in 1 BC.
When we connected to the Internet in 1999, I participated in religious
and calendar discussion groups. I sought the opinion of Bible scholars
and calendar specialists to know if there is any ring of truth in the
revelation. No one was able to prove to me that it was correct. In
fact, they said that the date was an impossibility and even scoffed at
me about such ridiculous idea. Finding no one to help me, I embarked
on checking it out myself to satisfy my own curiosity.
In 2002, I thought that I finally found that the revelation is correct.
I know from biblical accounts, Jesus was crucified on the eve of a
Sabbath. I had been assuming that that Sabbath was the weekly Saturday
Sabbath of the Jews. I had therefore been insisting that August 17, 1
BC was Friday in the proleptic Gregorian calendar although calendar
specialists like Karl Palmen of Great Britain and calendar converter
software on the Internet say that it was Thursday.
In 2003, I tried August 17, 1 BC to be Thursday. And presto,
everything came into place. Hence, after four years of study
(1999-2003), I finally verified that the revelation is correct with
notable findings discovered or confirmed as follows:
1. August 17, 1 BC that the Holy Spirit revealed is a date in the
proleptic Gregorian calendar and was a Thursday.
2. The corresponding date of August 17, 1 BC is Av 30, 3760 in the
Jewish lunisolar civil calendar.
3. Jesus was crucified on a Thursday and not on a Friday, and cannot
be on any other day for that matter.
4. The high day mentioned in John 19:31 turned out to be the New Moon
Festival.
5. High day means a major Jewish holy day wherein a Sabbath of rest is
also observed (no work or business).
6. The New Moon Festival was celebrated as a Sabbath, i.e. no business
or work on this day.
7. The New Moon Festival was a major Jewish holy day before but now
considered a minor one (Why?). This was before the Romans destroyed
Jerusalem and dispersed the Jews.
8. Jesus was crucified on the eve of the New Moon Festival and not on
the eve of the Saturday Sabbath.
9. Jesus was crucified in August, debunking the Christian tradition of
a March or April Holy Week that fixed Passover or Easter around the
vernal equinox in the fourth century AD.
10. Jesus was crucified in the Jewish month of Av and not of Nisan.
11. Jesus was crucified after, not during, the Passover Festival or
the Feast of Unleavened Bread or Pesach.
12. Passover was migrating through the seasons during ancient times
and the time of Jesus.
13. Passover was held on the first month of a purely lunar religious
calendar.
14. Jesus was in the tomb for three days and three nights.
15. The tomb was found empty on Monday morning, the first day of the
week of the followers of Jesus.
16. The followers of Jesus had been observing Sunday as their Sabbath
even while He was still alive.
17. Sabbath is observed on the seventh day of the week. The Sabbath
of the Jews is from sunset of Friday to sunset of Saturday. The
Sabbath of the followers of Jesus was from the sunset of Saturday to
the sunset of Sunday.
18. The first day of the week of the followers of Jesus is Monday,
since their Sabbath day, or their seventh day, is Sunday.
19. The Feast of Tabernacles or Shelters or Ingathering or Succoth was
fixed in the month of Tishri of the Jewish lunisolar civil calendar,
occurring sometime in September/October.
20. Jesus ascended to Heaven on the eve of the start of the Feast of
Tabernacles (Acts 1:12).
21. The festival where the speaking in tongues happened was during the
Feast of Tabernacles, and not during Pentecost or Shavouth.
22. The present calendar's year is the number of years from the
crucifixion and death of Jesus, and not from His birth.
23. Jesus was crucified in 1 BC and not in 33 AD or thereabout. The
crucifixion occurred 2006 years ago this year 2006 and not 1974 years
ago (2006 - 32 solar years, the age of Jesus when He was crucified.)
24. Presently in the Gregorian calendar, BC means Before Christ and AD
means anno Domini. When the Aristean calendar is implemented, new
abbreviations will be used to distinguish the year from the Gregorian.
BCA will mean Before Crucifixion (of Jesus Christ) in the Aristean
calendar and ADA means After Death (of Jesus Christ) in the Aristean
calendar.
25. The year AD 4 was indeed a leap year.
26. The Jews had a summer and a winter trading schedule. The summer
trading is from morning till noon, closed from noon till 4 pm, and
reopened from 4 pm till about half an hour to an hour after sunset.
The winter trading is from morning till before sunset. On Fridays, it
was from morning till noon only whether it was summer or winter.
It is now proven that Jesus was crucified and died on August 17, 1 BC
with many notable findings. August 17 in the Aristean calendar falls
on Saturday - and not on a Thursday. Christians may observe
Crucifixion Day (now called Good Friday) on this date or on the day of
the week when it happened - Thursday. The Thursday nearest August 17
in the Aristean calendar is August 15. So observance of Crucifixion
Day may be on Saturday, August 17, or on Thursday, August 15. Which is
more important - the commemoration of the date when it happened,
August 17, or the day of the week, Thursday?
Commemoration of August 17 in the Aristean calendar and using the
Aristean Decimal Time
August 17 - Saturday - crucifixion at about 88 aristos (3 pm)
(Crucifixion Day)
August 18 - Sunday - first day in tomb
August 19 - Monday - second day in tomb - (public holiday in lieu
of Saturday)
August 20 - Tuesday - third day in tomb - (public holiday -
Resurrection Eve)
August 21 - Wednesday - resurrection of Jesus - (public holiday
- Resurrection Day)
Commemoration on Thursday in the Aristean calendar and using the
Aristean Decimal Time
August 15 - Thursday - crucifixion at about 88 aristos (3 pm)
(public holiday - Crucifixion Day)
August 16 - Friday - first day in tomb - (public holiday? What
name?)
August 17 - Saturday - second day in tomb - weekend
August 18 - Sunday - third day in tomb - weekend
August 19 - Monday - resurrection of Jesus - (public holiday -
Resurrection Day)
In the Aristean Decimal Time, the day starts at 6 pm. Jesus was in the
tomb for three days and three nights. For a Saturday, August 17
crucifixion, Jesus must have resurrected from the dead on Wednesday
evening, August 21, between 0 and 25 aristos (6 pm and midnight). For
a Thursday, August 15 crucifixion, resurrection must have occurred on
Monday evening, August 19. His tomb was discovered empty the following
morning.
I hope that one day soon, we will be observing Crucifixion Day and
Resurrection Day in August.
Your comments will be much appreciated.
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
| User: "colp" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
30 Jan 2006 11:28:31 PM |
|
|
Crucifixion timeline:
Wednesday Evening: [Matthew 27:57] High sabbath following the passover
begins.
Joseph of Arimathea puts the body in his own tomb [Matthew 27:60].
The women observe the body being laid in the tomb [Luke 23:55].
Thursday Evening: High sabbath ends.
The women return and prepare spices and ointments [Luke 23:56].
Friday Evening: The sabbath begins.
The women rest [Luke 23:56].
Saturday Evening: The sabbath ends.
Sunday Morning: Mary visits the tomb [Matthew 28:1].
.
|
|
|
| User: "bam" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
02 Feb 2006 06:27:59 AM |
|
|
"colp" <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote in message
news:drmrbr$9fg$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
Crucifixion timeline:
Wednesday Evening: [Matthew 27:57] High sabbath following the passover
begins.
Joseph of Arimathea puts the body in his own tomb [Matthew 27:60].
The women observe the body being laid in the tomb [Luke 23:55].
Thursday Evening: High sabbath ends.
The women return and prepare spices and ointments [Luke 23:56].
Friday Evening: The sabbath begins.
The women rest [Luke 23:56].
Saturday Evening: The sabbath ends.
Sunday Morning: Mary visits the tomb [Matthew 28:1].
You don't even mention the crucifixion. And of what significance is Matt
27:57?
Mat 27:57 And when it was evening, there came a certain rich man of
Arimathea, named Joseph, who also himself was a disciple of Jesus.
John 19:31 is more relevant:
Joh 19:31 Then the Jews (because it was the parasceve), that the bodies
might not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day (for that was a great
sabbath day), besought Pilate that their legs might be broken: and that they
might be taken away.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11476a.htm
The use of the word Parasceve in the Gospels raises the question concerning
the actual day of Our Lord's crucifixion. All the Evangelists state that
Jesus died on the day of the Parasceve (Matthew 27:62; Mark 15:42; Luke
23:54; John 19:14, 31), and there can be no doubt from Luke, xxiii, 54-56
and John, xix, 31, that this was Friday. But on what day of the month of
Nisan did that particular Friday fall? St. John distinctly points to Nisan
14, while the Synoptists, by implying that the Last Supper was the Paschal
meal, convey the impresion that Jesus was crucified on Nisan 15. But this is
hardly reconcilable with the following facts: when Judas left the table, the
disciples imagined he was going to buy the things which were needed for the
feast (John 13:29)-a purchase which was impossible if the feast had begun;
after the Supper, Our Lord and his disciples left the city, as also did the
men detailed to arrrest Him-this, on Nisan 15, would have been contrary to
Ex., xii, 22; the next morning the Jews had not yet eaten the Passover;
moreover, during that day the Council convened; Simon was apparently coming
from work (Luke 23:26); Jesus and the two robbers were executed and were
taken down from the crosses; Joseph of Arimathea bought fine linen (Mark
15:46), and Nicodemus brought "a mixture of myrrh and aloes about an hundred
pound weight" (John 19:39) for the burial; lastly the women prepared spices
for the embalming of the Saviour's body (Luke 23:55)-all things which would
have been a desecration on Nisan 15. Most commentators, whether they think
the Last Supper to have been the Paschal meal or an anticipation thereof,
hold that Christ, as St. John states, was crucified on the Parasceve of the
Pasch, Friday, Nisan 14.
BAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "H.E. Eickleberry, Jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
02 Feb 2006 10:37:00 AM |
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:vSmEf.1269$_i2.323@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"colp" <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote in message
news:drmrbr$9fg$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
Crucifixion timeline:
Wednesday Evening: [Matthew 27:57] High sabbath following the passover
begins.
Joseph of Arimathea puts the body in his own tomb [Matthew 27:60].
The women observe the body being laid in the tomb [Luke 23:55].
Thursday Evening: High sabbath ends.
The women return and prepare spices and ointments [Luke 23:56].
Friday Evening: The sabbath begins.
The women rest [Luke 23:56].
Saturday Evening: The sabbath ends.
Sunday Morning: Mary visits the tomb [Matthew 28:1].
You don't even mention the crucifixion. And of what significance is Matt
27:57?
Mat 27:57 And when it was evening, there came a certain rich man of
Arimathea, named Joseph, who also himself was a disciple of Jesus.
John 19:31 is more relevant:
Joh 19:31 Then the Jews (because it was the parasceve), that the bodies
might not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day (for that was a great
sabbath day), besought Pilate that their legs might be broken: and that
they might be taken away.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11476a.htm
The use of the word Parasceve in the Gospels raises the question
concerning the actual day of Our Lord's crucifixion. All the Evangelists
state that Jesus died on the day of the Parasceve (Matthew 27:62; Mark
15:42; Luke 23:54; John 19:14, 31), and there can be no doubt from Luke,
xxiii, 54-56 and John, xix, 31, that this was Friday. But on what day of
the month of Nisan did that particular Friday fall? St. John distinctly
points to Nisan 14, while the Synoptists, by implying that the Last Supper
was the Paschal meal, convey the impresion that Jesus was crucified on
Nisan 15. But this is hardly reconcilable with the following facts: when
Judas left the table, the disciples imagined he was going to buy the
things which were needed for the feast (John 13:29)-a purchase which was
impossible if the feast had begun; after the Supper, Our Lord and his
disciples left the city, as also did the men detailed to arrrest Him-this,
on Nisan 15, would have been contrary to Ex., xii, 22; the next morning
the Jews had not yet eaten the Passover; moreover, during that day the
Council convened; Simon was apparently coming from work (Luke 23:26);
Jesus and the two robbers were executed and were taken down from the
crosses; Joseph of Arimathea bought fine linen (Mark 15:46), and Nicodemus
brought "a mixture of myrrh and aloes about an hundred pound weight" (John
19:39) for the burial; lastly the women prepared spices for the embalming
of the Saviour's body (Luke 23:55)-all things which would have been a
desecration on Nisan 15. Most commentators, whether they think the Last
Supper to have been the Paschal meal or an anticipation thereof, hold that
Christ, as St. John states, was crucified on the Parasceve of the Pasch,
Friday, Nisan 14.
BAM
Add to that Jesus story to the Pharisees about where He was going between
His death and resurrection:
Luke 13:32-33
"You go tell that fox that I cast out demons, and I do cures today and
tomorrow, and the third day I shall be perfected; Nevertheless, I must walk
today, and tomorrow, and the day following--for it cannot be that a prophet
from Israel should perish."
That's Friday ("today"), Saturday ("today and tomorrow"), with the
"perfection" on Sunday ("the third day").
Ike
--
www.eickleberrybooks.com
******************************
The Tree of Life (from "The Character Map")
The Beloved
Faith Hope
Righteousness Judgment Compassion
Courage Integrity Diligence Grace
Discipline of Thought Service Desire Decision and Belief
Glory Honor Power Wisdom Riches Blessing Strength w/Thanksgiving
He Who Loves
******************************
Remove X from address to reply
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 02:19:28 AM |
|
|
Dear H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. and my Fellowmen,
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus said, "For as Jonas was three days and three
nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth."
How do you think can you have three days and three nights if you have a
Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning discovery of an empty tomb?
This would only be equal to one-and-a-half days or one day and two
nights. Jesus was very specific that the Son of man will be "three
days and three nights in the heart of the earth".
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul R. Finch" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 05:37:07 AM |
|
|
"Peace Crusader" <acfernando@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139559567.982547.127730@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Dear H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. and my Fellowmen,
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus said, "For as Jonas was three days and three
nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth."
How do you think can you have three days and three nights if you have a
Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning discovery of an empty tomb?
This would only be equal to one-and-a-half days or one day and two
nights. Jesus was very specific that the Son of man will be "three
days and three nights in the heart of the earth".
The Hebrew "day/night" expression is only used by Matthew and was a way of
expressing calendar days.
If you think that there was a 3 X 24 hour span of time requirement, then
this means that the time of burial was a stop watch event.
If that is the case, why is it not recorded the exact moment that Jesus was
buried and the exact moment when he arose?
The biblical writers seem not to even care. The apostles fled and were
oblivious of this. No church father ever made a point of this.
Mark, Luke and John certainly made no attempt to support such an idea. Paul
never spoke of such a thing.
It is a modern theory that lacks biblical and historical support. Mathew,
writing to a Jewish audience, used a Jewish expression that is found
numerous times in the Old Testament. If you think that every time that it is
used in the OT that it was referring to a stop watch event, then that would
require that every such usage begin right at sunrise and end right at
sunrise. If not, this would extend the calendar days to one plus day than
stated in order to make up the unused portion of the first day with the
remaining portion of the last day. Its a ridiculous theory when you look at
it that way.
Paul R. Finch
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 04:20:03 PM |
|
|
"Paul R. Finch" wrote:
"Peace Crusader" <acfernando@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139559567.982547.127730@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Dear H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. and my Fellowmen,
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus said, "For as Jonas was three days and three
nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth."
How do you think can you have three days and three nights if you have a
Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning discovery of an empty tomb?
This would only be equal to one-and-a-half days or one day and two
nights. Jesus was very specific that the Son of man will be "three
days and three nights in the heart of the earth".
The Hebrew "day/night" expression is only used by Matthew and was a way of
expressing calendar days.
If you think that there was a 3 X 24 hour span of time requirement, then
this means that the time of burial was a stop watch event.
If that is the case, why is it not recorded the exact moment that Jesus was
buried and the exact moment when he arose?
The biblical writers seem not to even care. The apostles fled and were
oblivious of this. No church father ever made a point of this.
Mark, Luke and John certainly made no attempt to support such an idea. Paul
never spoke of such a thing.
It is a modern theory that lacks biblical and historical support. Mathew,
writing to a Jewish audience, used a Jewish expression that is found
numerous times in the Old Testament. If you think that every time that it is
used in the OT that it was referring to a stop watch event, then that would
require that every such usage begin right at sunrise and end right at
sunrise. If not, this would extend the calendar days to one plus day than
stated in order to make up the unused portion of the first day with the
remaining portion of the last day. Its a ridiculous theory when you look at
it that way.
Paul R. Finch
===>What is "ridiculous" is thinking that you are reading about a true
event when you read a piece of fiction. -- L.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 06:47:53 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:37:07 GMT, "Paul R. Finch"
<pfinch1@cfl.rr.com> spake thusly:
"Peace Crusader" <acfernando@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139559567.982547.127730@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Dear H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. and my Fellowmen,
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus said, "For as Jonas was three days and three
nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth."
How do you think can you have three days and three nights if you have a
Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning discovery of an empty tomb?
This would only be equal to one-and-a-half days or one day and two
nights. Jesus was very specific that the Son of man will be "three
days and three nights in the heart of the earth".
The Hebrew "day/night" expression is only used by Matthew and was a way of
expressing calendar days.
If you think that there was a 3 X 24 hour span of time requirement, then
this means that the time of burial was a stop watch event.
You are making an excuse.
Show us where the Bible says, "I am only expressing
calendar days".
Jesus was specific. You're trying to claim He wasn't.
I can believe His words, or yours.
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
"Faith is not an intellectual belief. Faith is
a belief with legs on it." - Adrian Rogers
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 04:22:38 PM |
|
|
Pastor Dave wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:37:07 GMT, "Paul R. Finch"
<pfinch1@cfl.rr.com> spake thusly:
"Peace Crusader" <acfernando@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139559567.982547.127730@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Dear H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. and my Fellowmen,
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus said, "For as Jonas was three days and three
nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth."
How do you think can you have three days and three nights if you have a
Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning discovery of an empty tomb?
This would only be equal to one-and-a-half days or one day and two
nights. Jesus was very specific that the Son of man will be "three
days and three nights in the heart of the earth".
The Hebrew "day/night" expression is only used by Matthew and was a way of
expressing calendar days.
If you think that there was a 3 X 24 hour span of time requirement, then
this means that the time of burial was a stop watch event.
You are making an excuse.
Show us where the Bible says, "I am only expressing
calendar days".
Jesus was specific. You're trying to claim He wasn't.
I can believe His words, or yours.
===>In that case your choice is believing a fiction or the
explanation of that fiction. -- L.
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
"Faith is not an intellectual belief. Faith is
a belief with legs on it." - Adrian Rogers
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 06:12:28 AM |
|
|
On 10 Feb 2006 00:19:28 -0800, "Peace Crusader"
<acfernando@hotmail.com> spake thusly:
Dear H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. and my Fellowmen,
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus said, "For as Jonas was three days and three
nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth."
How do you think can you have three days and three nights if you have a
Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning discovery of an empty tomb?
This would only be equal to one-and-a-half days or one day and two
nights. Jesus was very specific that the Son of man will be "three
days and three nights in the heart of the earth".
Exactly! He said three days *AND* three nights!
You cannot separate Jonah from what He said
and you cannot separate the "AND three nights"
from what He said.
You are right and we either believe Jesus, or we
try to figure out ways around what He said,
because we haven't got the guts to admit that
this is something that the church teaches, not
the Bible and we don't have the guts to rock
the boat!
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
The Last Days were in the first century:
"For yet, A LITTLE WHILE, and He that SHALL
come will come, and WILL NOT TARRY.
- Hebrews 10:37
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 04:16:38 PM |
|
|
Peace Crusader wrote:
Dear H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. and my Fellowmen,
In Matthew 12:40, Jesus said, "For as Jonas was three days and three
nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth."
How do you think can you have three days and three nights if you have a
Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning discovery of an empty tomb?
This would only be equal to one-and-a-half days or one day and two
nights. Jesus was very specific that the Son of man will be "three
days and three nights in the heart of the earth".
===>Don't believe everything you read. That's how.
The whole thing is a piece of fiction, edited and re-edited, and full
of contradictory details.
You will probably get all sorts of "explanations" for why the
discrepancy, like it was not on Friday, or that the "resurrection"
was really on Monday, etc. -- L.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
02 Feb 2006 11:36:54 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:27:59 -0500, "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote:
"colp" <colp@solder.ath.cx> wrote in message
news:drmrbr$9fg$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...
Crucifixion timeline:
Wednesday Evening: [Matthew 27:57] High sabbath following the passover
begins.
Joseph of Arimathea puts the body in his own tomb [Matthew 27:60].
The women observe the body being laid in the tomb [Luke 23:55].
Thursday Evening: High sabbath ends.
The women return and prepare spices and ointments [Luke 23:56].
Friday Evening: The sabbath begins.
The women rest [Luke 23:56].
Saturday Evening: The sabbath ends.
Sunday Morning: Mary visits the tomb [Matthew 28:1].
Actually it's put this way
"In (inside) the Sabbath day, as it began to Dawn (Begin)
Towards (Still outside) the 1st Day of the week.
now remember the Day ends at SUNDOWN and not SUNRISE.
just a thought
Sam,
You don't even mention the crucifixion. And of what significance is Matt
27:57?
Mat 27:57 And when it was evening, there came a certain rich man of
Arimathea, named Joseph, who also himself was a disciple of Jesus.
John 19:31 is more relevant:
Joh 19:31 Then the Jews (because it was the parasceve), that the bodies
might not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day (for that was a great
sabbath day), besought Pilate that their legs might be broken: and that they
might be taken away.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11476a.htm
The use of the word Parasceve in the Gospels raises the question concerning
the actual day of Our Lord's crucifixion. All the Evangelists state that
Jesus died on the day of the Parasceve (Matthew 27:62; Mark 15:42; Luke
23:54; John 19:14, 31), and there can be no doubt from Luke, xxiii, 54-56
and John, xix, 31, that this was Friday. But on what day of the month of
Nisan did that particular Friday fall? St. John distinctly points to Nisan
14, while the Synoptists, by implying that the Last Supper was the Paschal
meal, convey the impresion that Jesus was crucified on Nisan 15. But this is
hardly reconcilable with the following facts: when Judas left the table, the
disciples imagined he was going to buy the things which were needed for the
feast (John 13:29)-a purchase which was impossible if the feast had begun;
after the Supper, Our Lord and his disciples left the city, as also did the
men detailed to arrrest Him-this, on Nisan 15, would have been contrary to
Ex., xii, 22; the next morning the Jews had not yet eaten the Passover;
moreover, during that day the Council convened; Simon was apparently coming
from work (Luke 23:26); Jesus and the two robbers were executed and were
taken down from the crosses; Joseph of Arimathea bought fine linen (Mark
15:46), and Nicodemus brought "a mixture of myrrh and aloes about an hundred
pound weight" (John 19:39) for the burial; lastly the women prepared spices
for the embalming of the Saviour's body (Luke 23:55)-all things which would
have been a desecration on Nisan 15. Most commentators, whether they think
the Last Supper to have been the Paschal meal or an anticipation thereof,
hold that Christ, as St. John states, was crucified on the Parasceve of the
Pasch, Friday, Nisan 14.
BAM
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
31 Jan 2006 07:40:16 PM |
|
|
Dear Colp and my Fellowmen,
Are you thinking of a Wednesday crucifixion to get a Sunday
resurrection? Are you thinking of the high sabbath as first day of the
Passover Festival (Pesach)? Do you know that the first day of the
Passover Festival is a Sabbath? And when it is Sabbath, is work or
business permitted? Could people crucify a person during a Sabbath
without violating the ban on work?
When did the women buy the spices for the anointing of Jesus (Mark
16:1)?
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
colp wrote:
Crucifixion timeline:
Wednesday Evening: [Matthew 27:57] High sabbath following the passover
begins.
Joseph of Arimathea puts the body in his own tomb [Matthew 27:60].
The women observe the body being laid in the tomb [Luke 23:55].
Thursday Evening: High sabbath ends.
The women return and prepare spices and ointments [Luke 23:56].
Friday Evening: The sabbath begins.
The women rest [Luke 23:56].
Saturday Evening: The sabbath ends.
Sunday Morning: Mary visits the tomb [Matthew 28:1].
.
|
|
|
| User: "colp" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
31 Jan 2006 09:14:02 PM |
|
|
Peace Crusader wrote:
Dear Colp and my Fellowmen,
Are you thinking of a Wednesday crucifixion to get a Sunday
resurrection?
No, the Wednesday crucifixion is a inferred from the high sabbath of the
passover coming two days before the weekly sabbath.
Are you thinking of the high sabbath as first day of the
Passover Festival (Pesach)?
Yes.
Do you know that the first day of the
Passover Festival is a Sabbath?
Yes.
And when it is Sabbath, is work or
business permitted?
Not according to the Torah.
Could people crucify a person during a Sabbath
without violating the ban on work?
I doubt that the Romans would have observed the sabbath.
When did the women buy the spices for the anointing of Jesus (Mark
16:1)?
I don't know.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
01 Feb 2006 02:47:09 AM |
|
|
Dear Colp and my Fellowmen,
Copy wrote:
No, the Wednesday crucifixion is a inferred from the high sabbath of the
passover coming two days before the weekly sabbath.
My reply:
Where did you get that "the high sabbath of the passover coming two
days before the weekly sabbath"? What do you mean by high sabbath?
When do you have high sabbath?
In my study to determine whether the revelation of the Holy Spirit
holds water or not, I found out that the high sabbath referred to when
Jesus was crucified was not any of the days of the Passover but it was
the New Moon Festival. This festival was a sabbath day during the time
of Jesus. Did you know that there are more offerings made during the
New Moon Festival than the weekly Saturday Sabbath? Don't you think
that it is just logical to make the New Moon Festival a Sabbath day
like the Saturday Sabbath? Did you know that all the major Jewish
festivals have high sabbaths? The major festivals are New Year's Day
(Rosh Hashanah), Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur), Feast of Tabernacles
(Succoth), Feast of Unleavened Bread (Pesach), Harvest Festival or
Pentecost (Shavouth), and the New Moon Festival (Rosh Hodesh). Please
read about high sabbath in
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/highsabbath.htm.
And when it is Sabbath, is work or
business permitted?
Not according to the Torah.
FYI, the Torah says that when it is Sabbath, work or business is not
permitted.
Could people crucify a person during a Sabbath
without violating the ban on work?
I doubt that the Romans would have observed the sabbath.
Were the Roman soldiers just executing the will of the Jewish people?
Who did the Jewish people prefer to be released -- Jesus or Barrabas?
Who did they prefer to be crucified -- Jesus or Barrabas? The Romans
might not have observed the sabbath but the Jews did.
When did the women buy the spices for the anointing of Jesus (Mark
16:1)?
I don't know.
FYI, it was on the eve of the discovery of the empty tomb. Because
that was the only window of opportunity after their (the followers of
Jesus) Sabbath that they could buy the spices. And this happened on
Sunday after sunset (based on midnight change of day).
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
colp wrote:
Peace Crusader wrote:
Dear Colp and my Fellowmen,
Are you thinking of a Wednesday crucifixion to get a Sunday
resurrection?
No, the Wednesday crucifixion is a inferred from the high sabbath of the
passover coming two days before the weekly sabbath.
Are you thinking of the high sabbath as first day of the
Passover Festival (Pesach)?
Yes.
Do you know that the first day of the
Passover Festival is a Sabbath?
Yes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "colp" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
01 Feb 2006 08:00:40 PM |
|
|
Peace Crusader wrote:
Dear Colp and my Fellowmen,
Copy wrote:
No, the Wednesday crucifixion is a inferred from the high sabbath of the
passover coming two days before the weekly sabbath.
My reply:
Where did you get that "the high sabbath of the passover coming two
days before the weekly sabbath"?
From the three days of Jonah and Luke 23:56
One sabbath does not make for three days and nights in the tomb.
Two consecutive sabbaths does not give time for Mary to apply the spices
& ointments.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
01 Feb 2006 11:46:13 AM |
|
|
On 30 Jan 2006 00:09:17 -0800, "Peace Crusader"
<acfernando@hotmail.com> wrote:
My Dear Fellowmen,
The following is from the webpage
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/findings.htm. These are the
notable findings that were discovered or confirmed after proving the
the revelation of the Holy Spirit that Jesus was crucified on August
17, 1 BC is correct.
=========================================
NOTABLE FINDINGS
Jesus Died on Passover day, he lived 33 1/2 years do the Math,
another Clue was his Circumcision, as it was in the temple, with
a prophet commenting," that He cried not out"
only 1 ceremony would have allowed Jesus to be in the temple,
before his 8th Birthday.
he had to either Be born on the day of Atonement, or 8 days before
the feast of Tabernacles, to be presented unto YHWH, on the 1st day of
the
7 day feast.
this is usually in late September, or early October.
Passover is on the 14th day of Nissan, usually
in late march or early April, and
this is when He died
on Passover day, and was born in the early fall
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
01 Feb 2006 07:31:20 PM |
|
|
Dear Sam and my Fellowmen,
Did you know that the years mentioned in the Bible are in lunar years?
A lunar year has 354 days whereas a solar year has 365 days. Bible
scholars calculated that Jesus was 33 years when He died. But these 33
years are in lunar years. This is only equivalent to 32 solar years.
You mentioned that circumcision is before His 8th birthday. A Jew is
circumcised on his 8th day from his birth and not 8th year from his
birth. If Jesus was born on May 23, 33 BC, He was circumcised on May
31, 33 BC.
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
02 Feb 2006 11:32:26 AM |
|
|
On 1 Feb 2006 17:31:20 -0800, "Peace Crusader"
<acfernando@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sam and my Fellowmen,
Did you know that the years mentioned in the Bible are in lunar years?
A lunar year has 354 days whereas a solar year has 365 days. Bible
scholars calculated that Jesus was 33 years when He died. But these 33
years are in lunar years. This is only equivalent to 32 solar years.
You mentioned that circumcision is before His 8th birthday. A Jew is
circumcised on his 8th day from his birth and not 8th year from his
birth. If Jesus was born on May 23, 33 BC, He was circumcised on May
31, 33 BC.
Thanks for that correction, My Mind wanted to say that, but My fingers
did not.
8 days could Mean, that He was born 8 days before a feast day, or High
Sabboth, to be able to be Circumcised in the temple as the
Harmony of the gosples Implies, when the Prophet Prophecied about
Jesus, that "He opened not his Mouth" or "Cried out not"
Thanks again
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 02:38:34 AM |
|
|
Dear Sam and my Fellowmen,
Sam wrote:
You mentioned that circumcision is before His 8th birthday. A Jew is
circumcised on his 8th day from his birth and not 8th year from his
birth. If Jesus was born on May 23, 33 BC, He was circumcised on May
31, 33 BC.
Thanks for that correction, My Mind wanted to say that, but My fingers
did not.
8 days could Mean, that He was born 8 days before a feast day, or High
Sabboth, to be able to be Circumcised in the temple as the
Harmony of the gosples Implies, when the Prophet Prophecied about
Jesus, that "He opened not his Mouth" or "Cried out not"
Thanks again
My reply:
You are welcome. It is very gracious of you.
I understand that at circumcision, the baby boy is named. Whether the
circumcision is done in the temple or elsewhere, I do not know. Would
a Jew be available to tell us how this rite is performed?
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
10 Feb 2006 06:41:15 AM |
|
|
On 10 Feb 2006 00:38:34 -0800, "Peace Crusader"
<acfernando@hotmail.com> spake thusly:
Dear Sam and my Fellowmen,
Sam wrote:
You mentioned that circumcision is before His 8th birthday. A Jew is
circumcised on his 8th day from his birth and not 8th year from his
birth. If Jesus was born on May 23, 33 BC, He was circumcised on May
31, 33 BC.
Thanks for that correction, My Mind wanted to say that, but My fingers
did not.
8 days could Mean, that He was born 8 days before a feast day, or High
Sabboth, to be able to be Circumcised in the temple as the
Harmony of the gosples Implies, when the Prophet Prophecied about
Jesus, that "He opened not his Mouth" or "Cried out not"
Thanks again
My reply:
You are welcome. It is very gracious of you.
I understand that at circumcision, the baby boy is named. Whether the
circumcision is done in the temple or elsewhere, I do not know. Would
a Jew be available to tell us how this rite is performed?
Circumcision is performed on the eighth day of
the child's life, during the day. The day the child
is born counts as the first day, thus if the child is
born on a Wednesday, he is circumcised on the
following Wednesday. Keep in mind that Jewish
days begin at sunset, so if the child is born on a
Wednesday evening, he is circumcised the following
Thursday. Circumcisions are performed on Shabbat,
even though they involve the drawing of blood which
is ordinarily forbidden on shabbat. The Bible does
not specify a reason for the choice of the eighth day;
however, modern medicine has revealed that an
infant's blood clotting mechanism stabilizes on
the eighth day after birth. As with almost any
commandment, circumcision can be postponed
for health reasons. Jewish law provides that where
the child's health is at issue, circumcision must wait
until seven days after a doctor declares the child
healthy enough to undergo the procedure.
Circumcision involves surgically removing the foreskin
of the penis. The circumcision is performed by a mohel
(lit. circumciser; rhymes with oil), a pious, observant
Jew educated in the relevant Jewish law and in surgical
techniques. Circumcision performed by a regular
physician does not qualify as a valid brit milah,
regardless of whether a rabbi says a blessing over it,
because the removal of the foreskin is itself a
religious ritual that must be performed by someone
religiously qualified.
If the child is born without a foreskin (it happens
occasionally), or if the child was previously
circumcised without the appropriate religious intent
or in a manner that rendered the circumcision
religiously invalid, a symbolic circumcision may
be performed by taking a pinprick of blood from
the tip of the penis. This is referred to as hatafat
dam brit.
While the circumcision is performed, the child is
held by a person called a sandek. In English, this
is often referred to as a godfather. It is an honor
to be a sandek for a bris. The sandek is usually
a grandparent or the family rabbi. Traditionally,
a chair (often an ornate one) is set aside for Elijah,
who is said to preside over all circumcisions.
Various blessings are recited, including one over wine,
and a drop of wine is placed in the child's mouth.
The child is then given a formal Hebrew name.
It is not necessary to have a minyan for a bris,
but it is desirable if feasible.
As with most Jewish life events, the ritual is followed
by refreshments or a festive meal.
http://www.jewfaq.org/birth.htm#Brit
As for my own knowledge, I do recall children being
"dedicated" at the Temple, but I don't remember
anything about having to go to the Temple for
circumcision.
The dedication involves the first born and it is not
done on the 8th day, because the woman had to
be purified and wait 40 days...
Leviticus 12:2-4
2) Speak unto the children of Israel, saying,
If a woman have conceived seed, and borne
a man child: then she shall be unclean seven
days; according to the days of the separation
for her infirmity shall she be unclean.
3) And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin
shall be circumcised.
4) And she shall then continue in the blood of
her purifying three and thirty days; she shall
touch no hallowed thing, nor come into the
sanctuary, until the days of her purifying be
fulfilled.
As you can see, she could not come into the Temple,
until she was pure again and that would take a lot
longer than eight days. :)
Exodus 13:1-2, 12-15
1) And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying,
2) Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever
openeth the womb among the children of Israel,
both of man and of beast: it is mine.
12) That thou shalt set apart unto the LORD all
that openeth the matrix, and every firstling that
cometh of a beast which thou hast; the males
shall be the LORD's.
13) And every firstling of an ***** thou shalt redeem
with a lamb; and if thou wilt not redeem it, then
thou shalt break his neck: and all the firstborn of
man among thy children shalt thou redeem.
14) And it shall be when thy son asketh thee in time
to come, saying, What is this? that thou shalt say
unto him, By strength of hand the LORD brought
us out from Egypt, from the house of bondage:
15) And it came to pass, when Pharaoh would hardly
let us go, that the LORD slew all the firstborn in the
land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man, and the
firstborn of beast: therefore I sacrifice to the LORD
all that openeth the matrix, being males; but all
the firstborn of my children I redeem.
If you read through chapter 13, you'll see that
this was closely connected with Passover.
The firstborn male child, unlike the firstlings
of animals, was to be redeemed.
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
I know God won't give me anything I can't handle.
I just wish He didn't trust me so much.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
14 Feb 2006 07:54:08 PM |
|
|
Dear Pastor Dave and my Fellowmen,
Thank you very much for elucidating us of the Jewish rite of
circumcision.
You are well knowledgeable about it. Are you in anyway a Jew? You are
a Pastor and not a Rabbi, so you must be a Pastor of a Christian
congregation.
Could circumcision be a practice that should be adopted by Christians?
Presentation of the first born in the Temple? Purification period for
women?
Based on what is in the Bible, the slaughter of the innocent children
could not have happened before the 40th day, am I right? The Catholic
Church must have gotten it wrong by placing Ninos Innocentes on
December 28, three days after the supposed birth of Jesus.
The slaughter must have happened after the presentation of Jesus in
Jerusalem and it was after Mary was purified. The purification of a
woman who gave birth to a son lasts for 40 days.
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
Pastor Dave wrote:
On 10 Feb 2006 00:38:34 -0800, "Peace Crusader"
<acfernando@hotmail.com> spake thusly:
Dear Sam and my Fellowmen,
Sam wrote:
You mentioned that circumcision is before His 8th birthday. A Jew is
circumcised on his 8th day from his birth and not 8th year from his
birth. If Jesus was born on May 23, 33 BC, He was circumcised on May
31, 33 BC.
Thanks for that correction, My Mind wanted to say that, but My fingers
did not.
8 days could Mean, that He was born 8 days before a feast day, or High
Sabboth, to be able to be Circumcised in the temple as the
Harmony of the gosples Implies, when the Prophet Prophecied about
Jesus, that "He opened not his Mouth" or "Cried out not"
Thanks again
My reply:
You are welcome. It is very gracious of you.
I understand that at circumcision, the baby boy is named. Whether the
circumcision is done in the temple or elsewhere, I do not know. Would
a Jew be available to tell us how this rite is performed?
Circumcision is performed on the eighth day of
the child's life, during the day. The day the child
is born counts as the first day, thus if the child is
born on a Wednesday, he is circumcised on the
following Wednesday. Keep in mind that Jewish
days begin at sunset, so if the child is born on a
Wednesday evening, he is circumcised the following
Thursday. Circumcisions are performed on Shabbat,
even though they involve the drawing of blood which
is ordinarily forbidden on shabbat. The Bible does
not specify a reason for the choice of the eighth day;
however, modern medicine has revealed that an
infant's blood clotting mechanism stabilizes on
the eighth day after birth. As with almost any
commandment, circumcision can be postponed
for health reasons. Jewish law provides that where
the child's health is at issue, circumcision must wait
until seven days after a doctor declares the child
healthy enough to undergo the procedure.
Circumcision involves surgically removing the foreskin
of the penis. The circumcision is performed by a mohel
(lit. circumciser; rhymes with oil), a pious, observant
Jew educated in the relevant Jewish law and in surgical
techniques. Circumcision performed by a regular
physician does not qualify as a valid brit milah,
regardless of whether a rabbi says a blessing over it,
because the removal of the foreskin is itself a
religious ritual that must be performed by someone
religiously qualified.
If the child is born without a foreskin (it happens
occasionally), or if the child was previously
circumcised without the appropriate religious intent
or in a manner that rendered the circumcision
religiously invalid, a symbolic circumcision may
be performed by taking a pinprick of blood from
the tip of the penis. This is referred to as hatafat
dam brit.
While the circumcision is performed, the child is
held by a person called a sandek. In English, this
is often referred to as a godfather. It is an honor
to be a sandek for a bris. The sandek is usually
a grandparent or the family rabbi. Traditionally,
a chair (often an ornate one) is set aside for Elijah,
who is said to preside over all circumcisions.
Various blessings are recited, including one over wine,
and a drop of wine is placed in the child's mouth.
The child is then given a formal Hebrew name.
It is not necessary to have a minyan for a bris,
but it is desirable if feasible.
As with most Jewish life events, the ritual is followed
by refreshments or a festive meal.
http://www.jewfaq.org/birth.htm#Brit
As for my own knowledge, I do recall children being
"dedicated" at the Temple, but I don't remember
anything about having to go to the Temple for
circumcision.
The dedication involves the first born and it is not
done on the 8th day, because the woman had to
be purified and wait 40 days...
Leviticus 12:2-4
2) Speak unto the children of Israel, saying,
If a woman have conceived seed, and borne
a man child: then she shall be unclean seven
days; according to the days of the separation
for her infirmity shall she be unclean.
3) And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin
shall be circumcised.
4) And she shall then continue in the blood of
her purifying three and thirty days; she shall
touch no hallowed thing, nor come into the
sanctuary, until the days of her purifying be
fulfilled.
As you can see, she could not come into the Temple,
until she was pure again and that would take a lot
longer than eight days. :)
Exodus 13:1-2, 12-15
1) And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying,
2) Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever
openeth the womb among the children of Israel,
both of man and of beast: it is mine.
12) That thou shalt set apart unto the LORD all
that openeth the matrix, and every firstling that
cometh of a beast which thou hast; the males
shall be the LORD's.
13) And every firstling of an ***** thou shalt redeem
with a lamb; and if thou wilt not redeem it, then
thou shalt break his neck: and all the firstborn of
man among thy children shalt thou redeem.
14) And it shall be when thy son asketh thee in time
to come, saying, What is this? that thou shalt say
unto him, By strength of hand the LORD brought
us out from Egypt, from the house of bondage:
15) And it came to pass, when Pharaoh would hardly
let us go, that the LORD slew all the firstborn in the
land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man, and the
firstborn of beast: therefore I sacrifice to the LORD
all that openeth the matrix, being males; but all
the firstborn of my children I redeem.
If you read through chapter 13, you'll see that
this was closely connected with Passover.
The firstborn male child, unlike the firstlings
of animals, was to be redeemed.
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
I know God won't give me anything I can't handle.
I just wish He didn't trust me so much.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
15 Feb 2006 05:36:21 AM |
|
|
On 14 Feb 2006 17:54:08 -0800, "Peace Crusader"
<acfernando@hotmail.com> spake thusly:
Dear Pastor Dave and my Fellowmen,
Thank you very much for elucidating us of the Jewish rite of
circumcision.
You are well knowledgeable about it. Are you in anyway a Jew? You are
a Pastor and not a Rabbi, so you must be a Pastor of a Christian
congregation.
No, I am not Jewish. But I study the Scriptures from
a Jewish perspective, since they were written by Jews,
to Jews and not 21st century Gentiles. :)
Could circumcision be a practice that should be adopted by Christians?
No, it is not necessary. It was a sign of the Old
Covenant. Understand, that if you have it done
to your child, you are not automatically bound
to the Old Covenant. If it is not done the proper
way, it does not count for anything. So if a Gentile
wants to have it done for medical reasons, of which
there are supposed to be some benefits, then I
personally don't see an issue with it.
Presentation of the first born in the Temple?
The Temple system is no longer in existence.
That was the Old Covenant, which was taken
away, when Christ returned in 70 AD.
Purification period for women?
Again, an Old Covenant ritual.
Based on what is in the Bible, the slaughter of the innocent children
could not have happened before the 40th day, am I right? The Catholic
Church must have gotten it wrong by placing Ninos Innocentes on
December 28, three days after the supposed birth of Jesus.
As I thought, you are an atheist. The Bible does not
promote the slaughter of innocent children and you
should not foolishly assume that anyone was innocent.
And with that, we're done.
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
"Let your moderation be known unto all men.
The Lord is AT HAND" - Philippians 4:5
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
15 Feb 2006 07:43:48 PM |
|
|
Dear Pastor Dave and my Fellowmen,
Pastor Dave wrote:
Presentation of the first born in the Temple?
The Temple system is no longer in existence.
That was the Old Covenant, which was taken
away, when Christ returned in 70 AD.
My reply:
Could we still have the first-born male be presented in the Temple or
in the church? Because it is the Lord's. And we redeem the child with
doves or other animals as commanded in the Old Testament.
Jesus Christ did not return in 70 AD, as you wrote. He resurrected
from the dead after three days and three nights and was with His
apostles from time to time for the next 40 days until His ascension to
Heaven. And He returned as the Holy Spirit, who we, not only me but
several others, are able to talk to -- tape recorded. Did you know
that when He returns physically, that will be Judgment Day? Yes, He
will come again but not physically yet. Did you know that when we die,
He is the One who fetches us?
Purification period for women?
Again, an Old Covenant ritual.
My reply:
Modern women may not like to wait for 40 days or 80 days before they
are purified, or even think that because they have given birth, they
become impure.
Based on what is in the Bible, the slaughter of the innocent children
could not have happened before the 40th day, am I right? The Catholic
Church must have gotten it wrong by placing Ninos Innocentes on
December 28, three days after the supposed birth of Jesus.
As I thought, you are an atheist. The Bible does not
promote the slaughter of innocent children and you
should not foolishly assume that anyone was innocent.
My reply:
Did you think I am an atheist? Why made you think so? FYI, I am a
staunch follower of Jesus Christ. Did you know that the holy spirit we
talk to is none other than Jesus Christ Himself. Many are called but
few are chosen.
True, the Bible does not promote the slaughter of the innocent
children. But this happened as ordered by King Herod in order to
eliminate the child Jesus. I am not assuming that it happened. It is
in the Bible and was confirmed by the Holy Spirit to have happened.
And with that, we're done.
My reply:
I do not understand what you mean.
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Daniel" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
16 Feb 2006 05:23:28 AM |
|
|
Pastor Dave wrote:
Presentation of the first born in the Temple?
The Temple system is no longer in existence.
That was the Old Covenant, which was taken
away, when Christ returned in 70 AD.
My reply:
Could we still have the first-born male be presented in the Temple or
in the church? Because it is the Lord's. And we redeem the child with
doves or other animals as commanded in the Old Testament.
Jesus Christ did not return in 70 AD, as you wrote. He resurrected
from the dead after three days and three nights and was with His
apostles from time to time for the next 40 days until His ascension to
Heaven. And He returned as the Holy Spirit, who we, not only me but
several others, are able to talk to -- tape recorded. Did you know
that when He returns physically, that will be Judgment Day? Yes, He
will come again but not physically yet. Did you know that when we die,
He is the One who fetches us?
So where do we go until he returns then? Is there some kind of waiting pool
for the dead? And trust me, I am not joking when I ask that.
I mean to ask: where do our souls linger after death to wait for Judgement?
Personally, I can't wait to meet Jesus, He is the most incredible being
ever... and words can not even express how I think or feel about Him. He
is truely the perfect demonstration of a True King.
Purification period for women?
Again, an Old Covenant ritual.
My reply:
Modern women may not like to wait for 40 days or 80 days before they
are purified, or even think that because they have given birth, they
become impure.
Based on what is in the Bible, the slaughter of the innocent children
could not have happened before the 40th day, am I right? The Catholic
Church must have gotten it wrong by placing Ninos Innocentes on
December 28, three days after the supposed birth of Jesus.
As I thought, you are an atheist. The Bible does not
promote the slaughter of innocent children and you
should not foolishly assume that anyone was innocent.
My reply:
Did you think I am an atheist? Why made you think so? FYI, I am a
staunch follower of Jesus Christ. Did you know that the holy spirit we
talk to is none other than Jesus Christ Himself. Many are called but
few are chosen.
True, the Bible does not promote the slaughter of the innocent
children. But this happened as ordered by King Herod in order to
eliminate the child Jesus. I am not assuming that it happened. It is
in the Bible and was confirmed by the Holy Spirit to have happened.
And with that, we're done.
My reply:
I do not understand what you mean.
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
Quite frankly, if you look now in 2006, not much has changed since the era
of Jesus Christ. The only difference is that crimes are more professionally
done and we have a much larger population to contend with. Regardless, you
must believe that no matter what happened with Jesus, that he would have
saved us one way or another. Anyhow, just wanted to share a thought or two
:)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
20 Feb 2006 05:02:40 AM |
|
|
Dear Daniel and my Fellowmen,
Daniel wrote:
So where do we go until he returns then? Is there some kind of waiting
pool
for the dead? And trust me, I am not joking when I ask that.
I mean to ask: where do our souls linger after death to wait for
Judgement?
Personally, I can't wait to meet Jesus, He is the most incredible being
ever... and words can not even express how I think or feel about Him.
He
is truely the perfect demonstration of a True King.
My reply:
What happens when we die? Do we go to Heaven or do we go to Hell
straight away? To answer your question, when we die, we go to space.
We do not go to Heaven or to Hell straight away. But we are already
sentenced. It will be on Judgment Day when that sentence is handed
down. That is why on that Day, the true God will separate the sheep
from the goat, those in the Book of Life and those who are not. At
this time, as stated in Revelation 20:12-14 of the Holy Bible, New King
James Version: "And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before
God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the
Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by
the things which were written in the books. The sea gave up the dead
who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in
them. And they were judged, each one according to his works. Then
Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second
death. And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into
the lake of fire."
That is why we should always be prepared to face death, the first
death, the physical death, for after this, one cannot repent anymore.
It is late. It is not true that it is "better to be late than never".
Once you are late, you are late. Period. Full stop. So be like the
five virgins who had their lamps ready to meet the bridegroom (Matthew
25:1-13).
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
16 Feb 2006 05:58:17 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:23:28 -0500, "Daniel"
<dcclark@cogeco.ca> spake thusly:
Pastor Dave wrote:
Presentation of the first born in the Temple?
The Temple system is no longer in existence.
That was the Old Covenant, which was taken
away, when Christ returned in 70 AD.
My reply:
Could we still have the first-born male be presented in the Temple or
in the church? Because it is the Lord's. And we redeem the child with
doves or other animals as commanded in the Old Testament.
Jesus Christ did not return in 70 AD, as you wrote. He resurrected
from the dead after three days and three nights and was with His
apostles from time to time for the next 40 days until His ascension to
Heaven. And He returned as the Holy Spirit, who we, not only me but
several others, are able to talk to -- tape recorded. Did you know
that when He returns physically, that will be Judgment Day? Yes, He
will come again but not physically yet. Did you know that when we die,
He is the One who fetches us?
So where do we go until he returns then?
He did return and when we die physically,
we are now immediately resurrected to
judgment.
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
The Last Days were in the first century:
"A LITTLE WHILE, and ye shall not see me:
and again, A LITTLE WHILE and ye shall
see me, because I go to the Father."
- John 16:16
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
20 Feb 2006 04:48:26 AM |
|
|
Dear Pastor Dave and my Fellowmen,
Pastor Dave wrote:
He did return and when we die physically,
we are now immediately resurrected to
judgment.
My reply:
You believe that Jesus has already returned. When? Has He returned
physically? What did the two men in white apparel say to the apostles
as they looked up witnessing the ascension of Jesus to Heaven? Acts
1:11 says: "Men of Galilee, why do you stand gazing up into heaven?
This same Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will so come in
like manner as you saw Him go into heaven."
How will Jesus come back? In the same way as the apostles saw Him go
into Heaven. And when will this happen? FYI, on Judgment Day. All
who ever lived here on earth, small and great, will stand before the
throne to receive their sentence -- whether to go to Heaven or to Hell.
Those who are listed in the Book of Life will go to Heaven and those
who are not will be cast into the lake of fire. This is in Revelation
20:12-14. It seems that there are not as many who will enter Heaven as
those who will go to Hell because there is only one Book of Life
(singular) and there are many books (plural) where "the dead were
judged according to their works, by the things which were written in
the books." It seems that everyone is listed in the books but only a
certain percentage of these dead written in the books are found in the
Book of Life.
Pastor Dave quoted:
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
And he claims:
The Last Days were in the first century:
My reply:
Have all the prophecies of Jesus been fulfilled by the first century?
What were fulfilled and what were not? If not ALL his prophecies been
fulfilled by the first century, was Jesus lying when He said, "Verily I
say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be
fulfilled."
FYI, He was not lying. According to the Holy Spirit we talk to, it is
only now that the prophecies in Revelation are being fulfilled. Only
NOW. When do you think has the world ever assembled an army of
200,000,000 (Revelation 9:16)? Only now, isn't it? Which nation, do
you think, can assembly such a huge army? Do you know that it is this
nation which will cause World War III?
Now, where are the people of that generation that Jesus referred to?
Aren't they all dead now? Maybe, even their bones have been pulverized
already. FYI, they are still living. And are still with us. And they
will continue to exist until ALL that Jesus prophesied have been
fulfilled.
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
05 Mar 2006 02:52:37 AM |
|
|
Dear Pastor Dave and my Fellowmen,
Pastor Dave wrote:
I am not trying to be mean in my response. Rather,
I am just trying to be direct, so don't take offense.
You say, "He was not lying". What you mean is,
"It can only be about us today". That's why you
proceed to tell me why it can only be about YOU,
YOU, YOU!!!
Hmmmm....
Not only have you moved it to this century, which
of course, YOU happen to live in, but you have also
moved it overseas, to the same country that YOU
happen to live in. I mean, who cares when, or where
it was written right? It's all ABOUT YOU!!! (:
My reply:
I am not offended at all by what you wrote -- whether you agree or
disagree with me.
I am just hoping that time will be granted us to find out who is
correct. What I write is what I heard and learned from the Holy Spirit
who we talk to and record on audio tape our sessions with Him. In
effect, they are practically the views of the Holy Spirit which I also
personally believe, that is why I have the courage to express them in
these newsgroups.
You said that the prophecies of Jesus happened during the first century
AD, in AD 70, if I understand you. Tell me, were all that Jesus
prophesied happened during the first century? When did it happen that
a country was able to assemble an army of 200,000,000 -- two hundred
million -- soldiers? This is one prophecy in Revelation (9:16). Did
this happen in the first century AD?
Are all what your church believes in true? Please scrutinize the
teachings and doctrines of your church.
Would you like to know the prophecies that the Holy Spirit told us?
Would you believe that World War III will not start in the Middle East
but in the Philippines? Would you believe that it will be China which
will start this World War? Would you believe that human beings will
give birth to babies with three eyes, or without eyes, or without nose,
or without ears, or without eyebrows? Would you believe that human
beings will give birth to live fish and to kitten? And that cat will
give birth to human being? Impossible? Tell that to God. Is there
anything impossible to Him? The Holy Spirit revealed these to us and I
know that they will happen. Do you want to know more about His other
prophecies?
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
05 Mar 2006 02:47:26 PM |
|
|
On 5 Mar 2006 00:52:37 -0800, "Peace Crusader"
<acfernando@hotmail.com> spake thusly:
I am just hoping that time will be granted us to find out who is
correct.
I am not concerned with time.
Are all what your church believes in true?
Hopefully, but that is a red herring.
Translated, you're saying...
"I can't dispute what you've said, so I will
divert attention away from that by asking
if everything your church teaches is true
and then claim that since it probably isn't,
that you, Pastor Dave, have no right to
question my beliefs and should be quiet.
Of course, being the hypocrite that I am,
I will claim that I can still state my beliefs
and question yours"
Yea, that's real good dude! (:
Maybe you should realize instead, that if you
have no rebuttal for what I said, that there
is a reason for that! (:
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose
you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which
your fathers served that were on the other side of the
flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye
dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the
LORD. - Joshua 24:15
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peace Crusader" |
|
| Title: Re: Crucifixion of Jesus - August 17, 1 BC - notable findings |
05 Mar 2006 07:17:22 PM |
|
|
Dear Pastor Dave and my Fellowmen,
I suggest that you do not put under quotation marks which you claim
that I wrote.
I repeat my question:
You said that the prophecies of Jesus happened during the first century
AD, in AD 70, if I understand you. Tell me, did all that Jesus
prophesy happened during the first century? When did it happen that
a country was able to assemble an army of 200,000,000 -- two hundred
million -- soldiers? This is one prophecy in Revelation (9:16). Did
this happen in the first century AD?
You seem to be an intelligent person. If you think that all the
prophecies of Jesus did not happen during the first century BC, I
suggest that you have a re-examination of your beliefs, of the
teachings of your church.
The peace of the true God be with us now and always.
With love, your brother in Jesus,
Aristeo Canlas Fernando, Peace Crusader
Motto: pro aris et focis
http://www.geocities.com/peacecrusader888/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|