Darwinism, godless occultic masonic tripe!



 Religions > Bible > Darwinism, godless occultic masonic tripe!

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "martus"
Date: 27 Feb 2005 12:59:35 AM
Object: Darwinism, godless occultic masonic tripe!
Evolution: The Occult Doctrine of Becoming
With the British Royal Society acting as their headquarters of
propaganda, the elite had created an institution to provide
credibility for their specially designed 'science.' Now, they needed
to introduce the 'science.' Recall that the founding members of the
Royal Society were all Freemasons. Thus, whatever 'science' these men
would design would be derivative of Masonic doctrine. In The Meaning
of Masonry, W.L. Wilmhurst reveals the worldview underpinning the new
Masonic 'science':
"This - the evolution [emphasis added] of man into superman - was
always the purpose of the ancient Mysteries, and the real purpose of
modern Masonry is not the social and charitable purposes to which so
much attention is paid, but the expediting of the spiritual evolution
of those who aspire to perfect their own nature and transform it into
a more god-like quality. And this is a definite science, a royal art,
which it is possible for each of us to put into practice; whilst to
join the Craft for any other purpose than to study and pursue this
science is to misunderstand its meaning." (Wilmhurst, 47)
Later in the book, Wilmhurst reiterates this theme:
"Man who has sprung from earth and developed through the lower
kingdoms of nature to his present rational state, has yet to complete
his evolution [emphasis added] by becoming a god-like being and
unifying his consciousness with the Omniscient - to promote which is
and always has been the sole aim and purpose of all Initiation."
(Wilmhurst, 94)
With God's effective exile from science, man's position as imago viva
Dei (created in the image of the Creator) was summarily relegated to
obsolescence. Now, Freemasonry could introduce its occult doctrine of
'becoming,' the belief in man's gradual evolution towards apotheosis.
According to Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, Erasmus Darwin,
grandfather of Charles Darwin, was the first to promulgate the concept
of evolution:
"Dr. Erasmus Darwin (1731 - 1802) was the first man in England to
suggest those ideas which later were to be embodied in the Darwinian
theory by his grandson, Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882), who wrote in
1859 Origin of Species." (quoted in Daniel, 34)
The Lunar Society
Erasmus Darwin was the founder of the Lunar Society. According to
author Ian Taylor, the Lunar Society was active from about 1764 to
1800 and its prominent influence 'continued long afterwards under the
banner of The Royal Society.' The group's name owed itself to the fact
that members met monthly at the time of the full moon. The membership
of this group boasted such luminaries as John Wilkinson (who made
cannons), James Watt (who owed his notoriety to the steam engine),
Matthew Boulton (a manufacturer), Joseph Priestly (a chemist), Josiah
Wedgewood (who founded the famous pottery business), and Benjamin
Franklin. It is with the Lunar Society that one begins to identify
Erasmus' ties to Freemasonry. (Taylor, 55)
Interestingly enough, in an article by Lord Richie-Calder, Lunar
Society members were assigned the very esoteric appellation of
'merchants of light.' This was precisely the same description used for
the hypothetical society presented in Sir Francis Bacon's New Atlantis
(Taylor, 55). In her examination of J.G. Findel's History of
Freemasonry, Nesta Webster made the following observation: 'Findel
frankly admits that the New Atlantis contained unmistakable allusions
to Freemasonry and that Bacon contributed to its final transformation'
(Webster, 120).
Researcher Ian Taylor adds:
"Webster pointed out that one of the earliest and most eminent
precursors of Freemasonry is said to have been Francis Bacon, who is
also recognized to have been a Rosicrucian; the Rosicrucian and
Freemason orders were closely allied and may have had a common
source." (Taylor, 445)
Still, these are tenuous ties at best. Are there any sources that
firmly establish a Darwinian/Freemasonic connection? Mackey's
Encyclopedia of Freemasonry conclusively confirms a link:
"Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. [Erasmus] Darwin had been made a
Mason in the famous Time Immemorial Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning,
No. 2, of Scotland. Sir Francis Darwin, one of the Doctor's sons, was
made a Mason in Tyrian Lodge, No. 253, at Derby, in 1807 or 1808. His
son Reginald was made a Mason in Tyrian Lodge in 1804. The name of
Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is
very possible that he, like Francis, was a Mason." (quoted in Daniel,
34)
In 1794, Erasmus wrote a book entitled Zoonomia, which delineated his
theory of evolution (Taylor, 58). Being a Freemason, there is little
doubt that Erasmus cribbed liberally from the Lodge's occult doctrine
of 'becoming.' Before Erasmus had penned his precursory notions of
progressive biological development, Freemason John Locke (1632 - 1704)
extrapolated the Hindu doctrine of reincarnation into the context of
metaphysical naturalism and formulated a theory of evolution (Daniel,
33-34).
The British East India Company had imported the Hindu belief in
reincarnation to England where it would be adopted by the British
Royal Society. A prominent member of the Royal Society, John Locke
studied reincarnation extensively and, working with the occult
doctrine as an extrapolative inspiration, developed his own
evolutionary ideas. In fact, Locke's theory of evolution received the
support of the male members of Darwin's family (Daniel, 33-34). Two
centuries later, this occult concept of 'becoming' would be
transmitted to Charles Darwin and On the Origin of Species would be
born.
__________________________________________________________________________
End
times:
http://www.geocities.com/mart1963/
.

User: "ZenIsWhen"

Title: Re: Darwinism, godless occultic masonic tripe! 27 Feb 2005 02:32:36 AM
"martus" <marttila69@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:511a49a.0502262259.2193ef5c@posting.google.com...

Evolution: The Occult Doctrine of Becoming

With the British Royal Society acting as their headquarters of
propaganda, the elite had created an institution to provide
credibility for their specially designed 'science.' Now, they needed
to introduce the 'science.' Recall that the founding members of the
Royal Society were all Freemasons. Thus, whatever 'science' these men
would design would be derivative of Masonic doctrine. In The Meaning
of Masonry, W.L. Wilmhurst reveals the worldview underpinning the new
Masonic 'science':

"This - the evolution [emphasis added] of man into superman - was
always the purpose of the ancient Mysteries, and the real purpose of
modern Masonry is not the social and charitable purposes to which so
much attention is paid, but the expediting of the spiritual evolution
of those who aspire to perfect their own nature and transform it into
a more god-like quality. And this is a definite science, a royal art,
which it is possible for each of us to put into practice; whilst to
join the Craft for any other purpose than to study and pursue this
science is to misunderstand its meaning." (Wilmhurst, 47)

Later in the book, Wilmhurst reiterates this theme:

"Man who has sprung from earth and developed through the lower
kingdoms of nature to his present rational state, has yet to complete
his evolution [emphasis added] by becoming a god-like being and
unifying his consciousness with the Omniscient - to promote which is
and always has been the sole aim and purpose of all Initiation."
(Wilmhurst, 94)

With God's effective exile from science, man's position as imago viva
Dei (created in the image of the Creator) was summarily relegated to
obsolescence. Now, Freemasonry could introduce its occult doctrine of
'becoming,' the belief in man's gradual evolution towards apotheosis.

According to Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, Erasmus Darwin,
grandfather of Charles Darwin, was the first to promulgate the concept
of evolution:

"Dr. Erasmus Darwin (1731 - 1802) was the first man in England to
suggest those ideas which later were to be embodied in the Darwinian
theory by his grandson, Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882), who wrote in
1859 Origin of Species." (quoted in Daniel, 34)

The Lunar Society
Erasmus Darwin was the founder of the Lunar Society. According to
author Ian Taylor, the Lunar Society was active from about 1764 to
1800 and its prominent influence 'continued long afterwards under the
banner of The Royal Society.' The group's name owed itself to the fact
that members met monthly at the time of the full moon. The membership
of this group boasted such luminaries as John Wilkinson (who made
cannons), James Watt (who owed his notoriety to the steam engine),
Matthew Boulton (a manufacturer), Joseph Priestly (a chemist), Josiah
Wedgewood (who founded the famous pottery business), and Benjamin
Franklin. It is with the Lunar Society that one begins to identify
Erasmus' ties to Freemasonry. (Taylor, 55)

Interestingly enough, in an article by Lord Richie-Calder, Lunar
Society members were assigned the very esoteric appellation of
'merchants of light.' This was precisely the same description used for
the hypothetical society presented in Sir Francis Bacon's New Atlantis
(Taylor, 55). In her examination of J.G. Findel's History of
Freemasonry, Nesta Webster made the following observation: 'Findel
frankly admits that the New Atlantis contained unmistakable allusions
to Freemasonry and that Bacon contributed to its final transformation'
(Webster, 120).

Researcher Ian Taylor adds:

"Webster pointed out that one of the earliest and most eminent
precursors of Freemasonry is said to have been Francis Bacon, who is
also recognized to have been a Rosicrucian; the Rosicrucian and
Freemason orders were closely allied and may have had a common
source." (Taylor, 445)

Still, these are tenuous ties at best. Are there any sources that
firmly establish a Darwinian/Freemasonic connection? Mackey's
Encyclopedia of Freemasonry conclusively confirms a link:

"Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. [Erasmus] Darwin had been made a
Mason in the famous Time Immemorial Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning,
No. 2, of Scotland. Sir Francis Darwin, one of the Doctor's sons, was
made a Mason in Tyrian Lodge, No. 253, at Derby, in 1807 or 1808. His
son Reginald was made a Mason in Tyrian Lodge in 1804. The name of
Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is
very possible that he, like Francis, was a Mason." (quoted in Daniel,
34)

In 1794, Erasmus wrote a book entitled Zoonomia, which delineated his
theory of evolution (Taylor, 58). Being a Freemason, there is little
doubt that Erasmus cribbed liberally from the Lodge's occult doctrine
of 'becoming.' Before Erasmus had penned his precursory notions of
progressive biological development, Freemason John Locke (1632 - 1704)
extrapolated the Hindu doctrine of reincarnation into the context of
metaphysical naturalism and formulated a theory of evolution (Daniel,
33-34).

The British East India Company had imported the Hindu belief in
reincarnation to England where it would be adopted by the British
Royal Society. A prominent member of the Royal Society, John Locke
studied reincarnation extensively and, working with the occult
doctrine as an extrapolative inspiration, developed his own
evolutionary ideas. In fact, Locke's theory of evolution received the
support of the male members of Darwin's family (Daniel, 33-34). Two
centuries later, this occult concept of 'becoming' would be
transmitted to Charles Darwin and On the Origin of Species would be
born.

__________________________________________________________________________


End
times:
http://www.geocities.com/mart1963/

A lot of noise, signifying nothing.
.

User: "RetroProphet"

Title: Re: Darwinism, godless occultic masonic tripe! 27 Feb 2005 02:56:06 AM
You can pretend that modern science derives from
your favorite dispised evil superstitious belief system,
but the truth is that it really derives from scientific
reasoning.
Now, if you're looking for a "culprit" who did early and
serious damage to the Biblical account of the history
and development of life on Earth, and 200 years before
Charles Darwin mind you, may I suggest reading up on
the Danish scientist Nicholas Steno.
In the mid-1600s he found that it was possible to
establish the order in which layered rocks were deposited.
"The Seashell on the Mountaintop" by Alan Cutler is a
great book about him. I think you'd enjoy it.
===
Bookjacket Blurb
Seventeenth-century scientists were baffled:
How did the fossils of seashells find their way
to the tops of mountains? Nicholas Steno, hailed
by Stephen Jay Gould as "the founder of geology,"
solved the puzzle exploring beyond the pages of
the Bible and looking directly at the clues left
in the layers of the Earth.
With his groundbreaking answer to the fossil question,
Steno confounded religious and scientific thinking,
setting the stage for the modern science. At the same
time his ideas were undermining the Bible's authoritative
claim as to the age of the planet, Steno was entering
the priesthood and rising to bishop. He would ultimately
become venerated as a saint, beatified by the Catholic
Church in 1988.
A thrilling tale of scientific investigation and the
portrait of an extraordinary genius, "The Seashell on
the Mountaintop" is the story of how a scientist-
turned-priest forever changed our understanding of the Earth."
===
An wonderful lengthy excerpt from the first chapter
of the book may be perused at:
http://www.alan-cutler.com/excerpt.html
===
By the way, and on the subject of what's tripe,
if creationism isn't tripe, why is there no progression
of learning in creationism? The theories that are
touted today are the same that were touted in the 1920s,
and they're still all over the map.
Not what you'd expect if you've actually been given
the correct answers by God. Validation ought to be
easy as shooting fish in a barrel.
Yet, "Creation Scientists" can't agree on the size of
the flood, the question of the dinosaurs and whether
they were on the ark, how it is that we can see stars
millions of light-years away, and how it is possible
that as we examine older and older layers of rock, you
will arrive at a level where no human fossils are found,
but continuing backwards in time, the fossils still
continue much further, getting steadily simpler and simpler.
Heck, there's probably still Creation Scientists who haven't
ruled out fossils being placed in the earth by Satan.
In all these decades, creationists haven't
collectively ruled out ANYTHING within their
own "theory."
Science does not prove, it disproves.
"Creation Science" ain't science because it
has never disproven any of its hypotheses.
How can they, when they are convinced
that they are starting out with the answer,
straight from God?
You need to educate yourself about what
science means, martus.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER