| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"oldwetdog" |
| Date: |
09 Nov 2006 04:00:03 PM |
| Object: |
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
It is certainly reasonable, then, to conclude that if Dave denies the
letter to the Hebrews in NOT "relavant" or" meaningful" to him, or not
"to" him because his name is not in it, then that must also be true for
the letter to the Corinthians!
In other words, Dave has just cofessed or stated that Paul's words
(which Dave perverts to justify spousal rape) are not ment for him!
Wow!
In fact, Dave can use the same argument -- that his name is not in
Hebrews, or Colossians, or Revelation, or Thessalonian -- THAT THOSE
LETTERS ARE NOT TO OR FOR HIM EITHER!!
It is not any great leap of logic to conclude that since Dave's name is
NOT found _anywhere_ in God's Word, then God's Word is not for or to Dave.
You are quite correct, Dave: Your name is not in it, and you are not in
it --
-- and therefore it is meaningless to you except as a source of words
and phrases you can pervert to gratify your ego.
.
|
|
| User: "Randy" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
10 Nov 2006 05:52:24 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800,
in article <12l79757l6bfo69@corp.supernews.com>,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> wrote:
In other words, Dave has just cofessed or stated that Paul's words
(which Dave perverts to justify spousal rape)
I just watched a documentary about the BTK serial killer, on the
discovery channel. Women who worked with him said he always played
women's advocate, and acted like he was concerned about their safety.
It's not uncommon for a predator to feign concern about their own
intended victims, especially in the area where they hope to attack. It
seems like Owd can't stop bringing rape into almost every thread, and
playing women's advocate about that.
Ps 55:21 The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war
was in his heart: his words were softer than oil, yet were they drawn
swords.
--
Christ died for our sins, and God raised Him from the dead.
Rely on this work alone to escape hell and receive eternal
life (Jn. 3:16; 1 Cor. 15:1-3; Eph. 2:8-10; 2 Thess. 1:8-9).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 05:49:37 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
You know, I always thought that when someone wrote
a letter and sent it to someone, that it was directed to
them. Apparently, this response that I'm writing isn't
meant for anyone reading it. So Glenn, can you please
find a way to archive this, until a couple of thousand
years pass? I mean after all, we don't want the people
living in 4,000+ AD missing out, since according to you,
it's really meant for them.
Thanks! I appreciate it!
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 06:42:50 PM |
|
|
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7gf7l29i9oq22lk4oi0eod9fidqmdvp0d0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
Heb 4:7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so
long a time; as it is said, Today if ye will hear his voice, harden not your
hearts.
.
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 06:55:05 PM |
|
|
Vic wrote:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7gf7l29i9oq22lk4oi0eod9fidqmdvp0d0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
Heb 4:7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so
long a time; as it is said, Today if ye will hear his voice, harden not your
hearts.
But Vic, Dave's name is not in Hebrews!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 07:03:55 PM |
|
|
"oldwetdog" <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12l7jf9pdruhk40@corp.supernews.com...
Vic wrote:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7gf7l29i9oq22lk4oi0eod9fidqmdvp0d0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
Heb 4:7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after
so
long a time; as it is said, Today if ye will hear his voice, harden not
your
hearts.
But Vic, Dave's name is not in Hebrews!
I know, but that is because he has hardened his heart, or he has not heared
His voice.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 08:08:50 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:55:05 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Vic wrote:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7gf7l29i9oq22lk4oi0eod9fidqmdvp0d0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that
if/since/because his name is not in it, then it is
NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
Heb 4:7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David,
To day, after so long a time; as it is said, Today if ye will
hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
But Vic, Dave's name is not in Hebrews!
No, it isn't. So why would Vic claim that it is? And why
would you make a sarcastic remark, that implies agreement
with Vic's idiocy?
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
MY NAME, Glenn. Not another person named David,
who the writer of Hebrews is referring to, who lived many
centuries before the letter was written, that you stupidly
try to claim means you were right when you said it's
about us today.
And frankly, Vic is a real idiot for trying to use that as
some kind of proof that Hebrews is about us today and
not the people it was written to and you have to be a
real idiot to try to grab on to that!
And you have to be an even bigger idiot to try to change
the subject from what you originally wrote, which implied
that it is about us today, to whether or not the name
"David" is in the letter, when I asked you to underline
*MY* name!
Can you underline where it's talking about "Dave who
will live in the 21st century", or anything close to that?
If not, then why do *YOU* continue this stupidity?
We both know why. Because once again, your own
false doctrine proves you to be wrong and once again,
you will not admit that.
You know, I always thought that when someone wrote
a letter and sent it to someone, that it was directed to
them. Apparently, this response that I'm writing isn't
meant for anyone reading it. So Glenn, can you please
find a way to archive this, until a couple of thousand
years pass? I mean after all, we don't want the people
living in 4,000+ AD missing out, since according to you,
it's really meant for them.
Thanks! I appreciate it!
But hey, after all, what does it matter Glenn? What does
it matter, when you claim that not everything in the Bible
is Scripture anyway?
Hey Glenn, can you prove that Hebrews is Scripture?
I mean after all, you made yourself the judge of what
is and is not God's word. Surely you must have a way
of proving to us, what is and is not Scripture. So since
you dismiss whatever is in the Bible that disagrees
with you, can you please tell us why we should believe
that Hebrews is Scripture? Or do you wish to prove
as you usually do, that the only criteria for you is
whether or not you like what it says? And now that
it has been proved that Hebrews was directed to whom
it was written, do you wish to now change your claim
and say that it isn't Scripture?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 08:51:06 PM |
|
|
Azaliah wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:55:05 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Vic wrote:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7gf7l29i9oq22lk4oi0eod9fidqmdvp0d0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that
if/since/because his name is not in it, then it is
NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
Heb 4:7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David,
To day, after so long a time; as it is said, Today if ye will
hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
But Vic, Dave's name is not in Hebrews!
No, it isn't. So why would Vic claim that it is? And why
would you make a sarcastic remark, that implies agreement
with Vic's idiocy?
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
MY NAME,
No, I can't underline your name in Hebrews -- so Hebrews was NOT written
to you, and it has no meaning for you.
_YOU WIN_, Dave! Paul's words to the Hebrews have no meaning to you!
Fine! Are you happy now, Dave? Your name is NOT in Thessalonians or
Titus, or Romans! NOT even one of those letters has YOUR NAME in it!
Corinthians does not have you name in it -- so Paul did not write
Corinthians 7:1-12 to you... it has NO meaning to you -- OR TO YOUR WIFE!
_YOU WIN_ *!* Your name is found nowhere written in the Word of God!
NONE OF IT IS TO YOU OR FOR YOU AND IT HAS NO MEANING FOR YOU!!!!
You win this one, Dave -- the Word of God is meaningless to you.
But, you'd convinced me of that long before you proved your name is not
in it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 09:01:22 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:51:06 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
MY NAME,
No, I can't underline your name in Hebrews
Then you asked a stupid question.
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 06:59:26 PM |
|
|
Azaliah wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
Nope! And I can't underline your name in Corinthians either!
O.K., Fine, Dave, since your name is not in Hebrews or Thessalonians or
Corinthians or Romans, then it has no meaning for you.
Of course, since your wife's name is NOT in Corinthians 7:1-12, then
that letter has NO MEANING TO HER!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 08:53:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:59:26 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
Nope! And I can't underline your name in Corinthians either!
Can you underline yours? Or do you wish to admit that
it was written to the Corinthians?
When you were faced with the fact that you were implying
that no Christians had "resisted unto blood" after Hebrews
was written and asked you for proof that Hebrews was not
addressed to the people it was written to, you asked me...
"Have you resisted unto blood yet, Dave?"
....as if this was some kind of proof. (: The reality is, that
you only proved the fact that you have zero proof to offer,
which would show that it wasn't about those it was written
to. If you did, then you wouldn't have used a lame question
like that, which only proves that you are once again, assuming
that stating your assumption proves your assumption. (:
Tell us Glenn, when asked to prove that your claim that
Hebrews is about us and not those it was addressed to,
how does asking that question prove that no one before
me, "resisted unto blood"?
And let me ask you this, Glenn...
Why would you think that a letter called "HEBREWS",
and was definitely written to HEBREW people, would
be addressed by the author, to 21st century Gentiles,
living thousands of miles away, in a country that didn't
even exist yet and weren't even Hebrew?
O.K., Fine, Dave, since your name is not in Hebrews or
Thessalonians or Corinthians or Romans, then it has no
meaning for you.
That is not what I said. You are once again, as usual,
trying to be deceptive. I have read many writings that
have meaning to me. That does not mean that they
were addressed to me. And yet, here you are, trying
to claim that if something has meaning to us, that it
automatically means that it was written just for us.
Now how do you call that kind of lame, assinine illogic,
"proof that Hebrews was written to us and about us"?
And what "having meaning to me" also surely does not mean,
is that when someone said in their letter, "Now is the time",
that they were talking about thousands of years later.
Rather, they were talking about the time that they wrote it.
Or should we believe like you, that every time the Bible
uses the word "now", that it means "thousands of years later"?
"And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh
of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was
taken out of Man." - Genesis 2:3
I guess what Adam was REALLY saying, was that thousands
of years later, Eve would be "bone of his bones". (:
You see Glenn, contrary to what you wish to be true,
"now = now" when it is written. What it does not
equal, is "now = whenever Glenn reads it for the
first time".
And this brings us to the next logical questions, which are...
"Why do you not treat every other writing you read this way?
Why does this rule *ONLY* when you read the Bible?"
This is an important question. You have never explained this
to us, even though you have been asked these questions many,
many times.
And btw, what "now" also does not equal is...
"This can only be fulfilled only after Glenn reads it."
You see, when a prophecy is stated and then events occur
that fulfill that prophecy, one does not skip those events,
simply because one wasn't born yet when they happened.
All you are doing, is trying to manipulate the Bible to be all
about you and your time, because of your self centeredness
and your ego and your vanity! (:
The truth is, there is not one reason given in the Bible,
to believe that we should skip the initial fulfillment of
the prophecies and believe you, that those events don't
matter, because Glenn wasn't born yet. And it is wishful
thinking and pure imagination, that drives almost all of
the church today, who reads the Bible as if it didn't exist
before they opened it for the first time.
Ike is another person who thinks it's all about him, but
at least he's honest enough to admit that they were
fulfilled. But since, like you, his ego and vanity drive
him to demand that it be all about him and his time,
he claims that each prophecy must be fulfilled three times.
Of course, he can't explain what we're supposed to do,
while waiting for Jesus to walk the Earth and be crucified
three times. <chuckle>
Jesus said that when Jerusalem was surrounded and
about to be desolated, that "all things written" would
"be fulfilled". Now since that happened after He said it
and before you were born, why should we skip over it?
Give us a solid reason to. And that does not include
your own personal interpretation of what He said and
your false accusations that I'm a liar and a false accuser,
which you make up, because you can't answer the questions.
Your personal interpretations, which claim that your
assumptions prove your assumptions, are your imagination
and nothing more.
And when you challenged me to show you how Jesus' words
were fulfilled, I went through both Matthew 24 & Luke 21,
verse by verse and proved it to you. And what was your
response? Snipping my text and insulting me and accusing
me of being a liar, but only after snipping my text and
offering zero proof for your claims.
You do not impress me. Your whole so called "doctrine",
is nothing more than you making wild claims that aren't
found anywhere in the Bible.
So go for it Glenn. Show me how wrong I am. Prove your
claims and show me that...
1) I am spoken of in Hebrews.
2) You are spoken of in Hebrews.
3) Hebrews was not directed toward those who it was
written to.
4) That no one "resisted unto blood", after Hebrews
was written and before you were born.
5) That when a prophecy is fulfilled, that the Bible says
to skip those events and look for them to be fulfilled
in the 21st century, which only makes you just as
foolish as Ike.
6) That when you claim that the prophecies are "human events",
that those events which fulfilled them after they were
said, which occurred before you were born, were not,
"human events", because they didn't happen in your
life time.
7) That Hebrews should even be considered Scripture,
given the fact that you have been dismissing as
"not being God's word", whatever passages disagreed
with you, which if we believe you, means that the whole
Bible, including Hebrews, should be considered as being
questionable at best.
And also please address the following:
Tell us Glenn, when asked to prove that your claim that
Hebrews is about us and not those it was addressed to,
how does asking that question prove that no one before
me, "resisted unto blood"?
And let me ask you this, Glenn...
Why would you think that a letter called "HEBREWS",
and was definitely written to HEBREW people, would
be addressed by the author, to 21st century Gentiles,
living thousands of miles away, in a country that didn't
even exist yet and weren't even Hebrew?
Now go ahead and feel free to avoid the issues raised in
this message and hypocritically snip my words, while
complaining that I am dishonest for snipping your words,
when your words were nothing more than your attempt
at distraction from the subject at hand, which I have now
restated in this message.
<chuckle>
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 06:37:50 PM |
|
|
Azaliah wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
You say your name is not in Hebrews -- fine! I believe your name is not
in Hebrews.... or in Corinthians, or Thessalonians, or ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 07:00:08 PM |
|
|
"oldwetdog" <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12l7iev1lrhc54b@corp.supernews.com...
Azaliah wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
You say your name is not in Hebrews -- fine! I believe your name is not
in Hebrews.... or in Corinthians, or Thessalonians, or ...
And Romans, Ephesians in fact the Whole of God's Word
Hmm Corinthians!
Does that mean Dave's missus can say no after all?
.
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 08:15:18 PM |
|
|
Vic wrote:
"oldwetdog" <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12l7iev1lrhc54b@corp.supernews.com...
Azaliah wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:00:03 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!!
In the thread "Ye have not yet resisted unto blood"
(A Quote of Heb 12:1)
http://tinyurl.com/v8nhy
-------------------
Dave replied:
This was written in the 1st century. Are you trying to tell us that
there has been no slaughter of Christians since this was written?
owd:
Have YOU resisted sin unto blood?
Dave:
Do you see my name in Hebrews?
NOTE:
Dave is actually saying, stating or implying that if/since/because his
name is not in it, then it is NOT to him or for him.
Can you please underline my name in Hebrews, Glenn?
You say your name is not in Hebrews -- fine! I believe your name is not
in Hebrews.... or in Corinthians, or Thessalonians, or ...
And Romans, Ephesians in fact the Whole of God's Word
Hmm Corinthians!
Does that mean Dave's missus can say no after all?
Well, think about it, his name is not in Corinthians 7:1-12, so Paul was
not writing TO Dave, and they Mean Nothing to Dave -- any more than
Hebrews 12:1-4 does. Dave has no "right" to limit or repudiate her rights.
More importantly, by Dave's logic _HER_ name is not in Corinthians
7:1-12, so none of what Paul wrote is to her, and it certainly is NOT a
command that she need obey -- because HER name is not in it!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 09:02:02 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:15:18 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Well, think about it, his name is not in Corinthians 7:1-12, so Paul was
not writing TO Dave, and they Mean Nothing to Dave
You were fine up until the word "and".
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 07:57:44 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:37:50 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
You say your name is not in Hebrews -- fine! I believe your name is not
in Hebrews.... or in Corinthians, or Thessalonians, or ...
Okay, good. And neither is yours. Now the question that
remains, is why do you claim that Hebrews does not address
those it was written to and was supposed to be ignored as
irrelevant, until *you* were born?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 08:24:35 PM |
|
|
Azaliah wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:37:50 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
You say your name is not in Hebrews -- fine! I believe your name is not
in Hebrews.... or in Corinthians, or Thessalonians, or ...
Okay, good.
Thanks, Dave.
Dave, since your name is NOT in it, then it is meaningless to YOU.
And neither is yours. Now the question that
remains, is why do you claim that Hebrews does not address
those it was written to and was supposed to be ignored as
irrelevant, until *you* were born?
Again you prove yourself to be a liar and false accuser.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DAVE DENIES HIS NAME IS IN THE BIBLE!! |
09 Nov 2006 09:00:47 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 18:24:35 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Azaliah wrote:
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:37:50 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
You say your name is not in Hebrews -- fine! I believe your name is not
in Hebrews.... or in Corinthians, or Thessalonians, or ...
Okay, good.
Thanks, Dave.
Dave, since your name is NOT in it, then it is meaningless to YOU.
Please underline where I said that it is meaningless to me.
And neither is yours. Now the question that
remains, is why do you claim that Hebrews does not address
those it was written to and was supposed to be ignored as
irrelevant, until *you* were born?
Again you prove yourself to be a liar and false accuser.
How so? Stupid remarks are not proof. This just shows
that once again, you are ignoring the proof that you're
a liar.
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
