| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"brian a m stuckless" |
| Date: |
23 Mar 2006 07:50:22 AM |
| Object: |
Delta fL=(d)fA, light-PATH-deflection. |
$$ Delta fL=(d)fA, light-PATH-deflection.
$$ A "bent" ..or DEFLECTED light ray is an ACCELERATED light ray!.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
$$ Photon ACCELERATiON (frequency "shift") = CHANGE of VELOCiTY/t.
$$ Photon ACCELERATiON (frequency "shift") = CHANGE of (VECTOR)/t.
$$ A photon PATH's, fL "shift" (defelection) = ANGULAR fA "shift".
Now I'm going to repeat that statement
because you're a determined ignorant troll:
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
$$ Now I'm going to repeat that statement
$$ because you're a determined ignorant troll:
$$
$$ DEFLECTED light PATH.
$$ A "bent" ..or DEFLECTED light ray is an ACCELERATED light ray!.
$$
$$ Photon ACCELERATiON (frequency "shift") = CHANGE of VELOCiTY/t.
$$ Photon ACCELERATiON (frequency "shift") = CHANGE of (VECTOR)/t.
$$ A PHOTON PATH's fL "shift" (defelection) = ANGULAR, fA "shift".
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
$$ A "bent" ..or DEFLECTED light ray is an ACCELERATED light ray!.
Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR] frequency [fL] shift. Nowhere
in their paper did they equate this to a variable speed of light.
$$ Now I'm going to repeat that statement
$$ because you're a determined ignorant troll:
$$
$$ DEFLECTED light PATH.
$$ A "bent" ..or DEFLECTED light ray is an ACCELERATED light ray!.
$$
$$ Photon ACCELERATiON (frequency "shift") = CHANGE of VELOCiTY/t.
$$ Photon ACCELERATiON (frequency "shift") = CHANGE of (VECTOR)/t.
$$ A photon PATH's fL "shift" (defelection) = ANGULAR, fA "shift".
$$
Pound and Rebka reported a [ANGULAR] frequency [fA] shift.
$$ Pound and Rebka reported a [LiNEAR ] frequency [fL] shift.
$$ Pound & Rebka reported [ANGULAR=LiNEAR] frequency "shift".
Re: Delta fL=(d)fA, light-PATH-deflection. Re: ANY flux formula.
Re: REST Math=eM/c^2. Re: < My BiGGER bang.!! >< ascii iSS GUESS >.
IAM Way Truth and Life, Brian A M Stuckless ..over and OUT.
$$ ^
GUESS (RESTmass)*c^4=(iNTRiNSiC energy e)*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*meter.
$$ My GUESS iSS STANDARD
$$ < The STANDARD set. >
$$ /\
$$ __ _\/_ __
$$ \_\/_/\_\/_/
$$ /\_\/_/\ ("`-/")_.-'"``-._
$$ _\/_/\_\/_ \. . `; -._ )-;-, `)
$$ /_/\_\/_/\_\ \ / (v_,) _ )`-.\ ``-'
$$ /\ - O - _ .- _..-_/ / ((.'
$$ \/ / \ ((,.-' ((,/ By: Toe.!
$$ By deeds you know them.!! >><> >><> >><> >><> >><>
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM hath circumcised the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!
$$ :-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'`
$$ ____ _ _ _ _
$$ | _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | |
$$ | |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | |
$$ My _ENORMOUS_ | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | < _ |_| |_|
$$ |_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)
$$
$$ :*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_
BEHOLD, IAM THAT IAM WHOLLY WHOLLY WHOLLY He ..and no more is more.!!
meron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote: > "LeoK" <roffexx@yahoo.com> writes:
Here are some examples indicating nonzero light mass:
-=-
Now, the new theory (GR, in this cae) does not
require for an object to have a [REST] mass in order to be deflected.
-=-
Mati Meron
Re: is there a "theoretical" mass for a photon ???.
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
