Religions > Bible > DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin" |
| Date: |
21 Jul 2006 11:52:04 AM |
| Object: |
DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
Democrats plan $30 million of campaign ads By DAVID ESPO, AP Special
Correspondent
Signaling a new phase in the struggle for control of Congress, House
Democrats have reserved time for more than $30 million worth of
campaign advertising this fall in roughly two dozen congressional
districts, with a heavy emphasis on the Northeast and Midwest.
The Democratic targets include clusters of Republican-held seats in the
Philadelphia area held by Reps. Jim Gerlach, Curt Weldon and Michael
Fitzpatrick, as well as the Ohio River Valley, where Reps. John
Hostettler of Indiana, Geoff Davis of Kentucky and Steve Chabot of Ohio
can expect a protracted televised barrage.
Based on information available to date, the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee intends to air ads for eight weeks in an attempt to
defeat Rep. Heather Wilson (news, bio, voting record) of New Mexico.
Rep. Clay Shaw of Florida faces a particularly well-financed opponent,
but he can also expect to face five weeks of Democratic-paid
advertising.
After 12 years in the minority, Democrats need to pick up 15 seats this
fall to gain control of the House.
Material about advertising reservations is publicly available. Bill
Burton, a spokesman at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee,
declined to comment, although other officials said the organization is
in the process of identifying additional target seats and reserving
more advertising time.
Reserving time in advance can save money for a purchaser because some
stations will sell advertising during the summer months at lower rates
than they can command in September or October.
By signaling their intentions this far in advance, Democrats also make
it possible for their own candidates to know how much help they can
expect. While the advertising effort must be kept independent of the
candidates, the public nature of the information makes it widely known.
At the same time, Democrats have not yet paid any money to stations,
and the strategy of reserving large amounts of advertising time far in
advance can carry risks.
Two years ago, the DCCC reserved time to advertise in a pair of House
races in New Hampshire, heartening the party's candidates as well as
activists in the state. When the station asked for payment, the
committee dropped its plans, infuriating local officials who complained
that the state had been written off by strategists in Washington.
Carl Forti, a spokesman for the National Republican Campaign Committee,
said the organization has not yet reserved advertising time, although
it plans to do so in the coming weeks.
Until recently, the two parties have largely been focused on candidate
recruitment, fundraising and opposition research to prepare for the
intense final few months of the two-year campaign cycle.
Two years ago, the two parties spent more than $70 million combined on
their own advertising, which by law are undertaken independent of
activity by the campaigns.
Judging by recent reports, the totals for 2006 will be higher.
The DCCC reported this week it had $32 million in the bank as of June
30, compared with $18.4 at the same point two years ago.
The NRCC reported slightly $26.5 million cash on hand as of June 30.
Party-paid advertising has played a critical role in the national
battle for House control in recent years, with Republican and
Democratic strategists both concentrating their efforts on a relatively
small number of seats that appeared competitive.
Democrats have labored for more than a year to increase the number of
competitive districts, and appear to have done so to an unknown extent.
There are other differences between the current campaign and the last
one that appear to benefit Democrats.
The electorate has grown weary of the war in Iraq, and as a result,
President Bush's poll ratings are far lower than during his successful
re-election campaign in 2004.
Additionally, unlike in 2004, Democrats are not defending a spate of
districts in Texas that were redistricted to make them more favorable
to Republicans. The DCCC spent roughly $4.5 million in advertising in
five districts in the state two years ago in an effort to save
incumbents from defeat. Four of the seats fell to the Republicans.
Based on the time reserved to date, Democrats appear inclined to make
Hostettler the recipient of their most sustained advertising barrage,
11 weeks in the area around Evansville.
Other targets include Reps. Dave Reichert of Washington, Mike Sodrel of
Indiana and Rob Simmons of Connecticut.
Apart from Republican incumbents, Democrats intend to advertise in
several GOP-held seats where lawmakers are retiring. They include
districts held by Reps. Jim Kolbe in Arizona, Bob Beauprez in Colorado,
Jim Nussle in Iowa, Mark Green in Wisconsin and Henry Hyde in Illinois.
The party also reserved time to advertise in districts held by
Democratic Reps. Melissa Bean of Illinois, Leonard Boswell of Iowa and
Alan Mollohan of West Virginia. Republicans have signaled they will
target all three for defeat.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--------------------------------------------------------
The smart voters will continue to vote Republican while the Democraps
will continue to advertise to the high school dropouts. Money won't
matter this year or in 2008.
Osu!
Sensei Shaolin
10th Dan Grandmaster - Shaolin Ninjitsu=A9
Founder of the World Class Martial Arts Association of Martial Arts
Masters (W.C.M.A.A.M.A.M.)
.
|
|
| User: "William Coleman" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 06:17:39 PM |
|
|
"Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin" <shaolinninjitsu@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153500724.358288.244420@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Democrats plan $30 million of campaign ads By DAVID ESPO, AP Special
Correspondent
Signaling a new phase in the struggle for control of Congress, House
Democrats have reserved time for more than $30 million worth of
campaign advertising this fall in roughly two dozen congressional
districts, with a heavy emphasis on the Northeast and Midwest.
The Democratic targets include clusters of Republican-held seats in the
Philadelphia area held by Reps. Jim Gerlach, Curt Weldon and Michael
Fitzpatrick, as well as the Ohio River Valley, where Reps. John
Hostettler of Indiana, Geoff Davis of Kentucky and Steve Chabot of Ohio
can expect a protracted televised barrage.
Based on information available to date, the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee intends to air ads for eight weeks in an attempt to
defeat Rep. Heather Wilson (news, bio, voting record) of New Mexico.
Rep. Clay Shaw of Florida faces a particularly well-financed opponent,
but he can also expect to face five weeks of Democratic-paid
advertising.
After 12 years in the minority, Democrats need to pick up 15 seats this
fall to gain control of the House.
Material about advertising reservations is publicly available. Bill
Burton, a spokesman at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee,
declined to comment, although other officials said the organization is
in the process of identifying additional target seats and reserving
more advertising time.
Reserving time in advance can save money for a purchaser because some
stations will sell advertising during the summer months at lower rates
than they can command in September or October.
By signaling their intentions this far in advance, Democrats also make
it possible for their own candidates to know how much help they can
expect. While the advertising effort must be kept independent of the
candidates, the public nature of the information makes it widely known.
At the same time, Democrats have not yet paid any money to stations,
and the strategy of reserving large amounts of advertising time far in
advance can carry risks.
Two years ago, the DCCC reserved time to advertise in a pair of House
races in New Hampshire, heartening the party's candidates as well as
activists in the state. When the station asked for payment, the
committee dropped its plans, infuriating local officials who complained
that the state had been written off by strategists in Washington.
Carl Forti, a spokesman for the National Republican Campaign Committee,
said the organization has not yet reserved advertising time, although
it plans to do so in the coming weeks.
Until recently, the two parties have largely been focused on candidate
recruitment, fundraising and opposition research to prepare for the
intense final few months of the two-year campaign cycle.
Two years ago, the two parties spent more than $70 million combined on
their own advertising, which by law are undertaken independent of
activity by the campaigns.
Judging by recent reports, the totals for 2006 will be higher.
The DCCC reported this week it had $32 million in the bank as of June
30, compared with $18.4 at the same point two years ago.
The NRCC reported slightly $26.5 million cash on hand as of June 30.
Party-paid advertising has played a critical role in the national
battle for House control in recent years, with Republican and
Democratic strategists both concentrating their efforts on a relatively
small number of seats that appeared competitive.
Democrats have labored for more than a year to increase the number of
competitive districts, and appear to have done so to an unknown extent.
There are other differences between the current campaign and the last
one that appear to benefit Democrats.
The electorate has grown weary of the war in Iraq, and as a result,
President Bush's poll ratings are far lower than during his successful
re-election campaign in 2004.
Additionally, unlike in 2004, Democrats are not defending a spate of
districts in Texas that were redistricted to make them more favorable
to Republicans. The DCCC spent roughly $4.5 million in advertising in
five districts in the state two years ago in an effort to save
incumbents from defeat. Four of the seats fell to the Republicans.
Based on the time reserved to date, Democrats appear inclined to make
Hostettler the recipient of their most sustained advertising barrage,
11 weeks in the area around Evansville.
Other targets include Reps. Dave Reichert of Washington, Mike Sodrel of
Indiana and Rob Simmons of Connecticut.
Apart from Republican incumbents, Democrats intend to advertise in
several GOP-held seats where lawmakers are retiring. They include
districts held by Reps. Jim Kolbe in Arizona, Bob Beauprez in Colorado,
Jim Nussle in Iowa, Mark Green in Wisconsin and Henry Hyde in Illinois.
The party also reserved time to advertise in districts held by
Democratic Reps. Melissa Bean of Illinois, Leonard Boswell of Iowa and
Alan Mollohan of West Virginia. Republicans have signaled they will
target all three for defeat.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The smart voters will continue to vote Republican
LOL. That is funny. Why do you use the word "continue". The smart voters
have never voted Republican. You need to understand that the smarter you
are, the more likely you are to vote Democratic. The more educated you are,
the more likely you are to vote Democratic. These are not opinions, these
are facts.
Intelligent conservative is not an oxymoron, but it certainly has an
oxymoronic flavor.
while the Democraps
And what party is that? Do you understand that using such perjorative
labels accurately pegs your mental age at less than 12?
will continue to advertise to the high school dropouts.
Again, the more educated you are, the more likely you are to vote
Democratic.
Money won't matter this year or in 2008.
Why do you make this assertion, because it looks like the Democrats will
have more money? All the elections where the Republicans were better
funded, were you still saying money won't matter?
Do you know why the Democrats will likely have more money? Because most of
the Republican money comes from corporations, and corporations don't like to
back losers, a lot of corporate money is going to Democrats.
Face it. The Republican regime is over, probably permanently. The Bush
Crime Family and the Republican Party have fucked up the world and this
country so badly that the voters will not forget for at least a generation.
Money always matters a great deal in politics. Apparently you do not
understand the realities of the American political system.
William Coleman (ramashiva)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael K" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 02:55:56 PM |
|
|
"The smart voters will still vote Republican."
So all the idiots who voted GWB into office twice will vote for the
Democrats now?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Herbert Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 04:31:03 PM |
|
|
"The smart voters will still vote Republican."
So all the idiots who voted GWB into office twice will vote for the
Democrats now?
All two of them?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "rondolce" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 06:39:38 PM |
|
|
Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin wrote:
Democrats plan $30 million of campaign ads By DAVID ESPO, AP Special
Correspondent
Signaling a new phase in the struggle for control of Congress, House
Democrats have reserved time for more than $30 million worth of
campaign advertising this fall in roughly two dozen congressional
districts, with a heavy emphasis on the Northeast and Midwest.
The Democratic targets include clusters of Republican-held seats in the
Philadelphia area held by Reps. Jim Gerlach, Curt Weldon and Michael
Fitzpatrick, as well as the Ohio River Valley, where Reps. John
Hostettler of Indiana, Geoff Davis of Kentucky and Steve Chabot of Ohio
can expect a protracted televised barrage.
Based on information available to date, the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee intends to air ads for eight weeks in an attempt to
defeat Rep. Heather Wilson (news, bio, voting record) of New Mexico.
Rep. Clay Shaw of Florida faces a particularly well-financed opponent,
but he can also expect to face five weeks of Democratic-paid
advertising.
After 12 years in the minority, Democrats need to pick up 15 seats this
fall to gain control of the House.
Material about advertising reservations is publicly available. Bill
Burton, a spokesman at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee,
declined to comment, although other officials said the organization is
in the process of identifying additional target seats and reserving
more advertising time.
Reserving time in advance can save money for a purchaser because some
stations will sell advertising during the summer months at lower rates
than they can command in September or October.
By signaling their intentions this far in advance, Democrats also make
it possible for their own candidates to know how much help they can
expect. While the advertising effort must be kept independent of the
candidates, the public nature of the information makes it widely known.
At the same time, Democrats have not yet paid any money to stations,
and the strategy of reserving large amounts of advertising time far in
advance can carry risks.
Two years ago, the DCCC reserved time to advertise in a pair of House
races in New Hampshire, heartening the party's candidates as well as
activists in the state. When the station asked for payment, the
committee dropped its plans, infuriating local officials who complained
that the state had been written off by strategists in Washington.
Carl Forti, a spokesman for the National Republican Campaign Committee,
said the organization has not yet reserved advertising time, although
it plans to do so in the coming weeks.
Until recently, the two parties have largely been focused on candidate
recruitment, fundraising and opposition research to prepare for the
intense final few months of the two-year campaign cycle.
Two years ago, the two parties spent more than $70 million combined on
their own advertising, which by law are undertaken independent of
activity by the campaigns.
Judging by recent reports, the totals for 2006 will be higher.
The DCCC reported this week it had $32 million in the bank as of June
30, compared with $18.4 at the same point two years ago.
The NRCC reported slightly $26.5 million cash on hand as of June 30.
Party-paid advertising has played a critical role in the national
battle for House control in recent years, with Republican and
Democratic strategists both concentrating their efforts on a relatively
small number of seats that appeared competitive.
Democrats have labored for more than a year to increase the number of
competitive districts, and appear to have done so to an unknown extent.
There are other differences between the current campaign and the last
one that appear to benefit Democrats.
The electorate has grown weary of the war in Iraq, and as a result,
President Bush's poll ratings are far lower than during his successful
re-election campaign in 2004.
Additionally, unlike in 2004, Democrats are not defending a spate of
districts in Texas that were redistricted to make them more favorable
to Republicans. The DCCC spent roughly $4.5 million in advertising in
five districts in the state two years ago in an effort to save
incumbents from defeat. Four of the seats fell to the Republicans.
Based on the time reserved to date, Democrats appear inclined to make
Hostettler the recipient of their most sustained advertising barrage,
11 weeks in the area around Evansville.
Other targets include Reps. Dave Reichert of Washington, Mike Sodrel of
Indiana and Rob Simmons of Connecticut.
Apart from Republican incumbents, Democrats intend to advertise in
several GOP-held seats where lawmakers are retiring. They include
districts held by Reps. Jim Kolbe in Arizona, Bob Beauprez in Colorado,
Jim Nussle in Iowa, Mark Green in Wisconsin and Henry Hyde in Illinois.
The party also reserved time to advertise in districts held by
Democratic Reps. Melissa Bean of Illinois, Leonard Boswell of Iowa and
Alan Mollohan of West Virginia. Republicans have signaled they will
target all three for defeat.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------------------------------------------------
The smart voters will continue to vote Republican while the Democraps
will continue to advertise to the high school dropouts. Money won't
matter this year or in 2008.
Osu!
Sensei Shaolin
10th Dan Grandmaster - Shaolin Ninjitsu=A9
Founder of the World Class Martial Arts Association of Martial Arts
Masters (W.C.M.A.A.M.A.M.)
Do you mean all those voters who didn't realize how unqualified for
President Bush was after Kerry beat him senseless in those three
debates? P.S. You HAVE to work on a decent acronym for your
organization. Better name, too.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Herbert Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 07:30:07 PM |
|
|
Do you mean all those voters who didn't realize how unqualified for
President Bush was after Kerry beat him senseless in those three
debates? P.S. You HAVE to work on a decent acronym for your
organization. Better name, too.
Kerry qualified? Why Kerry had a lower grade point average than Bush at
Yale. Oh you must be talking about the war hero Kerry. Let's see how long
was in Nam. Just long enough to change clothes. Perhaps you are talking
about the Kerry that was for energy efficiency - the one that drove a big
SUV. Or is it the Kerry that was for the little man - the Kerry that was a
billionaire.
If you want to win dont run a fraud and dont let Dan Rather tell lies -
looks bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 10:24:38 PM |
|
|
Kerry qualified? Why Kerry had a lower grade point average than Bush at
Yale.
Bush had his "high" GPA paid for, by his dear old (legacy grad) Daddy,
Bush I.
Oh you must be talking about the war hero Kerry. Let's see how long
was in Nam. Just long enough to change clothes.
Let's see how long BUSH was in 'Nam. Oh--that's right--HE WASN'T.
Or is it the Kerry that was for the little man - the Kerry that was a
billionaire.
Unlike "Oil Man" Bush, whom he and his daddy have more money than God,
and whose granddaddy, Prescott Bush, did deals with the Nazis?
And how can you tell me Bush is for the "little guy" when he keeps
giving tax breaks to the super-rich, and screws the middle and lower
classes in the *****?
Bush is a fucking phony, and you know it.
If you want to win dont run a fraud and dont let Dan Rather tell lies -
looks bad.
Those weren't lies--that fake memo was planted by a GOP operative to
discredit Rather AND the Kerry campaign. But the story about Bush
having less-than-honorable conduct during his service in Lubbock in the
Champagne Brigade is all factual.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Herbert Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
22 Jul 2006 04:01:23 PM |
|
|
Bush had his "high" GPA paid for, by his dear old (legacy grad) Daddy,
Bush I.
Really. He paid the Dean.
Oh you must be talking about the war hero Kerry. Let's see how long
was in Nam. Just long enough to change clothes.
Let's see how long BUSH was in 'Nam. Oh--that's right--HE WASN'T.
He did not claim to be a war hero.
Or is it the Kerry that was for the little man - the Kerry that was a
billionaire.
Unlike "Oil Man" Bush, whom he and his daddy have more money than God,
and whose granddaddy, Prescott Bush, did deals with the Nazis?
Not more than Kerry though. Heinz.
And how can you tell me Bush is for the "little guy" when he keeps
giving tax breaks to the super-rich, and screws the middle and lower
classes in the *****?
Tch did I say he was.
Bush is a fucking phony, and you know it.
And so is Kerry. So dont run a phony next time.
If you want to win dont run a fraud and dont let Dan Rather tell lies -
looks bad.
Those weren't lies--that fake memo was planted by a GOP operative to
discredit Rather AND the Kerry campaign.
Sure it was. Rubbish.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "rondolce" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 08:58:11 PM |
|
|
Herbert Cannon wrote:
Do you mean all those voters who didn't realize how unqualified for
President Bush was after Kerry beat him senseless in those three
debates? P.S. You HAVE to work on a decent acronym for your
organization. Better name, too.
Kerry qualified? Why Kerry had a lower grade point average than Bush at
Yale. Oh you must be talking about the war hero Kerry. Let's see how long
was in Nam. Just long enough to change clothes. Perhaps you are talking
about the Kerry that was for energy efficiency - the one that drove a big
SUV. Or is it the Kerry that was for the little man - the Kerry that was a
billionaire.
If you want to win dont run a fraud and dont let Dan Rather tell lies -
looks bad.
I meant the Kerry who watched Bush come apart after telling him "Saddam
Hussein didn't attack us, Osama bin Laden attacked us". The Kerry
whose tour of duty was terminated by a third qualifying wound (check
U.S. Navy regulations). But I digress....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Herbert Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
22 Jul 2006 03:58:04 PM |
|
|
whose tour of duty was terminated by a third qualifying wound (check
U.S. Navy regulations).
scratch.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "rondolce" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 06:49:12 PM |
|
|
Grandmaster Sensei Shaolin wrote:
Democrats plan $30 million of campaign ads By DAVID ESPO, AP Special
Correspondent
Signaling a new phase in the struggle for control of Congress, House
Democrats have reserved time for more than $30 million worth of
campaign advertising this fall in roughly two dozen congressional
districts, with a heavy emphasis on the Northeast and Midwest.
The Democratic targets include clusters of Republican-held seats in the
Philadelphia area held by Reps. Jim Gerlach, Curt Weldon and Michael
Fitzpatrick, as well as the Ohio River Valley, where Reps. John
Hostettler of Indiana, Geoff Davis of Kentucky and Steve Chabot of Ohio
can expect a protracted televised barrage.
Based on information available to date, the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee intends to air ads for eight weeks in an attempt to
defeat Rep. Heather Wilson (news, bio, voting record) of New Mexico.
Rep. Clay Shaw of Florida faces a particularly well-financed opponent,
but he can also expect to face five weeks of Democratic-paid
advertising.
After 12 years in the minority, Democrats need to pick up 15 seats this
fall to gain control of the House.
Material about advertising reservations is publicly available. Bill
Burton, a spokesman at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee,
declined to comment, although other officials said the organization is
in the process of identifying additional target seats and reserving
more advertising time.
Reserving time in advance can save money for a purchaser because some
stations will sell advertising during the summer months at lower rates
than they can command in September or October.
By signaling their intentions this far in advance, Democrats also make
it possible for their own candidates to know how much help they can
expect. While the advertising effort must be kept independent of the
candidates, the public nature of the information makes it widely known.
At the same time, Democrats have not yet paid any money to stations,
and the strategy of reserving large amounts of advertising time far in
advance can carry risks.
Two years ago, the DCCC reserved time to advertise in a pair of House
races in New Hampshire, heartening the party's candidates as well as
activists in the state. When the station asked for payment, the
committee dropped its plans, infuriating local officials who complained
that the state had been written off by strategists in Washington.
Carl Forti, a spokesman for the National Republican Campaign Committee,
said the organization has not yet reserved advertising time, although
it plans to do so in the coming weeks.
Until recently, the two parties have largely been focused on candidate
recruitment, fundraising and opposition research to prepare for the
intense final few months of the two-year campaign cycle.
Two years ago, the two parties spent more than $70 million combined on
their own advertising, which by law are undertaken independent of
activity by the campaigns.
Judging by recent reports, the totals for 2006 will be higher.
The DCCC reported this week it had $32 million in the bank as of June
30, compared with $18.4 at the same point two years ago.
The NRCC reported slightly $26.5 million cash on hand as of June 30.
Party-paid advertising has played a critical role in the national
battle for House control in recent years, with Republican and
Democratic strategists both concentrating their efforts on a relatively
small number of seats that appeared competitive.
Democrats have labored for more than a year to increase the number of
competitive districts, and appear to have done so to an unknown extent.
There are other differences between the current campaign and the last
one that appear to benefit Democrats.
The electorate has grown weary of the war in Iraq, and as a result,
President Bush's poll ratings are far lower than during his successful
re-election campaign in 2004.
Additionally, unlike in 2004, Democrats are not defending a spate of
districts in Texas that were redistricted to make them more favorable
to Republicans. The DCCC spent roughly $4.5 million in advertising in
five districts in the state two years ago in an effort to save
incumbents from defeat. Four of the seats fell to the Republicans.
Based on the time reserved to date, Democrats appear inclined to make
Hostettler the recipient of their most sustained advertising barrage,
11 weeks in the area around Evansville.
Other targets include Reps. Dave Reichert of Washington, Mike Sodrel of
Indiana and Rob Simmons of Connecticut.
Apart from Republican incumbents, Democrats intend to advertise in
several GOP-held seats where lawmakers are retiring. They include
districts held by Reps. Jim Kolbe in Arizona, Bob Beauprez in Colorado,
Jim Nussle in Iowa, Mark Green in Wisconsin and Henry Hyde in Illinois.
The party also reserved time to advertise in districts held by
Democratic Reps. Melissa Bean of Illinois, Leonard Boswell of Iowa and
Alan Mollohan of West Virginia. Republicans have signaled they will
target all three for defeat.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------------------------------------------------
The smart voters will continue to vote Republican while the Democraps
will continue to advertise to the high school dropouts. Money won't
matter this year or in 2008.
Osu!
Sensei Shaolin
10th Dan Grandmaster - Shaolin Ninjitsu=A9
Founder of the World Class Martial Arts Association of Martial Arts
Masters (W.C.M.A.A.M.A.M.)
P=2EP.S. I just googled both your Chinese/Japanese hybrid named system
and your organization. Can't find either. Where do you base yourselves,
what is your system about? Do you exist in the real world or just in
somebody's imagination?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ML" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 12:43:21 PM |
|
|
In my 20 years of voting, I have voted (to the best of my memory) for
ONE democrat. However, if the Republicans insist on voting on crap
like the internet gambling bill and if they insist on continuing to be
the ***** of big oil, I will pull the Democrat tab for every election
from here on out until there is a viable alternative.
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence. Furthermore, there is no logic behind separating the
Lotto from poker.
All this is in addition to the spending binge the Republicans have been
on. The are making the tax and spend Democrats blush.
--
ML
.
|
|
|
| User: "Herbert Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 01:26:00 PM |
|
|
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence. Furthermore, there is no logic behind separating the
Lotto from poker.
Rot. China and India are sucking up oil by the barrel full. It is a tight
market. Grow a brain.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ML" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 01:34:57 PM |
|
|
Herbert Cannon wrote:
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence. Furthermore, there is no logic behind separating the
Lotto from poker.
Rot. China and India are sucking up oil by the barrel full. It is a tight
market. Grow a brain.
At least HALF of the demand problem, here in the US is due to lack of
refineries, NOT the oil.
--
ML
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grey Mouser West" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 02:44:58 PM |
|
|
ML wrote:
Herbert Cannon wrote:
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence. Furthermore, there is no logic behind separating the
Lotto from poker.
Rot. China and India are sucking up oil by the barrel full. It is a tight
market. Grow a brain.
At least HALF of the demand problem, here in the US is due to lack of
refineries, NOT the oil.
Why didn't you build some more refineries?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rabid Weasel" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 03:02:57 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:44:58 -0700, Grey Mouser West wrote:
ML wrote:
Herbert Cannon wrote:
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence. Furthermore, there is no logic behind separating the
Lotto from poker.
Rot. China and India are sucking up oil by the barrel full. It is a tight
market. Grow a brain.
At least HALF of the demand problem, here in the US is due to lack of
refineries, NOT the oil.
Why didn't you build some more refineries?
Can't.
It takes special permits which are expensive and just this side of
impossible to get, then it takes years to get it built and up and running.
All that while fighting local and imported "Environmentalists" who are
griping that they don't want it in *their* back yard and that it'll kill
the widdle bunnies and stuff.
The U.S. hasn't built a new Refinery since the 70's.
Peace favor your sword (IH),
Kirk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grey Mouser West" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 03:16:14 PM |
|
|
Rabid Weasel wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:44:58 -0700, Grey Mouser West wrote:
ML wrote:
Herbert Cannon wrote:
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence. Furthermore, there is no logic behind separating the
Lotto from poker.
Rot. China and India are sucking up oil by the barrel full. It is a tight
market. Grow a brain.
At least HALF of the demand problem, here in the US is due to lack of
refineries, NOT the oil.
Why didn't you build some more refineries?
Can't.
It takes special permits which are expensive and just this side of
impossible to get, then it takes years to get it built and up and running.
All that while fighting local and imported "Environmentalists" who are
griping that they don't want it in *their* back yard and that it'll kill
the widdle bunnies and stuff.
The U.S. hasn't built a new Refinery since the 70's.
I hear a lot of complaining about the oil industry not building
refineries but I can't see why they would want to. They wouldn't get a
return on that investment. At lest the high price of gas will motivate
people to start investing in alternatives.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rabid Weasel" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 03:30:23 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:16:14 -0700, Grey Mouser West wrote:
Rabid Weasel wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:44:58 -0700, Grey Mouser West wrote:
ML wrote:
Herbert Cannon wrote:
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence. Furthermore, there is no logic behind separating the
Lotto from poker.
Rot. China and India are sucking up oil by the barrel full. It is a tight
market. Grow a brain.
At least HALF of the demand problem, here in the US is due to lack of
refineries, NOT the oil.
Why didn't you build some more refineries?
Can't.
It takes special permits which are expensive and just this side of
impossible to get, then it takes years to get it built and up and running.
All that while fighting local and imported "Environmentalists" who are
griping that they don't want it in *their* back yard and that it'll kill
the widdle bunnies and stuff.
The U.S. hasn't built a new Refinery since the 70's.
I hear a lot of complaining about the oil industry not building
refineries but I can't see why they would want to. They wouldn't get a
return on that investment.
'Course not. The additional costs of permits and useless "environmental
safeties" along with fighting numerous court cases trying to *stop* them,
makes it absurdly expensive.
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grey Mouser West" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 12:51:52 PM |
|
|
ML wrote:
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence.
What are you talking about? If you think this is an energy crisis wait
till the price of gas doubles. Peak oil is real. Gas will never be
this cheap again.
Regards,
-Eric
.
|
|
|
| User: "ML" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 01:00:56 PM |
|
|
Grey Mouser West wrote:
ML wrote:
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence.
What are you talking about? If you think this is an energy crisis wait
till the price of gas doubles. Peak oil is real. Gas will never be
this cheap again.
There is no excuse for the fact that there are really no alternatives
to gas powered cars. Now, I know, you are going to mention E85 (or
other crap). But E85, here, has it's price set based on gas (real
alternative, huh?) and is still 15% gas. A real alternative would be
E100, not 85, and it's price dictated by demand, not the demand of
gasoline.
If the western world could get totally off of oil, we wouldn't have to
worry one bit about the Middle East. Without oil sells, they would
diminish into irrelavance. No oil, no money, no funds for terrorism.
Period.
And trust me, most people are feeling the crunch in their budgets
WITHOUT gas prices doubling.
--
ML
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 01:11:24 PM |
|
|
There is no excuse for the fact that there are really no alternatives
to gas powered cars. Now, I know, you are going to mention E85 (or
other crap). But E85, here, has it's price set based on gas (real
alternative, huh?) and is still 15% gas. A real alternative would be
E100, not 85, and it's price dictated by demand, not the demand of
gasoline.
E100, huh? Well, you'd better get started drilling E100 wells, then.
I assume that by "alternative energies" you mean forms of energy that
come out of the ground, like, for free as oil does, yes? Do we have a
VIABLE source of E100? Seriously, you'd be better off advocating
nuclear plants steam cracking H2.
If the western world could get totally off of oil, we wouldn't have to
worry one bit about the Middle East. Without oil sells, they would
diminish into irrelavance. No oil, no money, no funds for terrorism.
Period.
Um...how do you propose we "get off" oil? Oil is free energy and its
growth in supply over the last 150 years has been the engine driving
the exponential pyramid that is the Industrial Revolution. All other
sources of energy, including nuclear, wind, solar, and hydro require
significant overhead compared to oil/coal/NG. Only with tax credits
and high oil prices has wind even become viable.
Trav
.
|
|
|
| User: "ML" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 01:23:53 PM |
|
|
travisgod@aol.cominyrface wrote:
E100, huh? Well, you'd better get started drilling E100 wells, then.
I assume that by "alternative energies" you mean forms of energy that
come out of the ground, like, for free as oil does, yes? Do we have a
VIABLE source of E100? Seriously, you'd be better off advocating
nuclear plants steam cracking H2.
That would be E as in Ethanol, Sherlock. I was speaking about 100%
ethanol cars, like Brazil has.
--
ML
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grey Mouser West" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 01:19:01 PM |
|
|
ML wrote:
Grey Mouser West wrote:
ML wrote:
There is no excuse to the current energy crisis, other than sheer greed
and purposeful planning on the part of big oil and Congress
acquiescence.
What are you talking about? If you think this is an energy crisis wait
till the price of gas doubles. Peak oil is real. Gas will never be
this cheap again.
There is no excuse for the fact that there are really no alternatives
to gas powered cars.
Technology doesn't grow on trees. Why didn't you invent a practical
alternative powered car?
Now, I know, you are going to mention E85 (or
other crap).
Never heard of it.
But E85, here, has it's price set based on gas (real
alternative, huh?) and is still 15% gas. A real alternative would be
E100, not 85, and it's price dictated by demand, not the demand of
gasoline.
A real alternative would be cold fusion powered hydrogens stations. I
don't see how anything else could power hydrogen. What I have read
about bio fuels does not look good.
If the western world could get totally off of oil, we wouldn't have to
worry one bit about the Middle East.
Like central Africa?
Without oil sells, they would
diminish into irrelavance. No oil, no money, no funds for terrorism.
Period.
I think terrorism is the new conventional warfare. It is here to stay.
Too bad the people who use it don't know it never works beyond
creating chaos.
And trust me, most people are feeling the crunch in their budgets
WITHOUT gas prices doubling.
An early high price of gas is a good thing because it motivates
everyone to invest in alternatives. We want peak oil to take a shallow
curve.
Regards,
-Eric
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: DemocRATS plan $30 million of campaign ads: The smart voters will still vote Republican |
21 Jul 2006 12:49:49 PM |
|
|
Well that's just not fair, considering the republicans won't be
spending any money at all.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|