Religions > Bible > Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
15 Oct 2005 11:30:15 AM |
| Object: |
Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
Since I've now posted two threads which give Pastor Dave precisely what
he asked for in his challenge to evolutionists regarding so-called
macroevolution, and he ran away from the first (and I guarantee you he
will run away from the second), I'm now going back to posting
references to the material right in the first message:
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/pelycodus.html
"The dashed lines show the overall trend. The species at the
bottom is Pelycodus ralstoni, but at the top we find two species,
Notharctus nunienus and Notharctus venticolus. The two species later
became even more distinct, and the descendants of nunienus are now
labeled as genus Smilodectes instead of genus Notharctus.
"As you look from bottom to top, you will see that each group has
some overlap with what came before. There are no major breaks or sudden
jumps. And the form of the creatures was changing steadily."
I'm still waiting on even one scientific discussion of the evidence
I've presented or referenced in **OVER FIVE HUNDRED AND FIFTY
EXAMPLES**.
If you don't come through with your promise of a discussion instead of
running away every time, people are going to start believing your
macroevolution challenge was nothing but a fraud, Pastor Dave.
We can discuss this one or any one of the other specific examples I
gave, or you can keep running from them and be labeled a coward, a
liar, and a hypocrite. It's your choice how you will be remembered,
after all
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 02:34:15 PM |
|
|
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
19 Oct 2005 12:37:27 PM |
|
|
"Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in message
news:VQc4f.52$iv.156@news.uswest.net...
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Hey Raymond, does your father know that you are using his computer? Why
don't I call him and see if he does.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Soul food" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 04:14:21 PM |
|
|
Into alt.atheism shot "Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com> and
breathlessly exclaimed:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Can anybody spot the problem with the above posting?
------------------------------------------------
"If iron chariots make people immune to God (Judges 1:19), why do Christians drive cars?"
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 07:51:51 PM |
|
|
"Soul food" <cthulhu@soulstogo.com> wrote in message
news:n7s2l1996rm2dbie915h0a2j8m1g95teua@4ax.com...
Into alt.atheism shot "Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com> and
breathlessly exclaimed:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Can anybody spot the problem with the above posting?
------------------------------------------------
"If iron chariots make people immune to God (Judges 1:19), why do
Christians drive cars?"
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
If you are insinuating that I could care less by answering his duncescreed
you are incorrect.
Just because I reply to a thread doesn't mean that I could give a damn.
Now take you for instance.
You are in Christian newsgroups because you hate God.
That needs to be clarified first.
Second,you are not a practical atheist.
Practical atheists don't give God a second thought.
They are the ones I worry about.
You on the other hand would rather come here and attempt to spit in your
God's eye than acknowledge him.
That is pitiful.
Hop on over to the pink unicorn newsgroups.
They're missing an idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jesus H Christ" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
16 Oct 2005 11:34:26 AM |
|
|
"Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in
news:32j4f.75$SP4.6687@news.uswest.net:
You are in Christian newsgroups because you hate God.
Nope.
I'm in Christian newsgroups because you crossposted from there and run
off your mouth spouting hateful propaganda and mistruths.
Second,you are not a practical atheist.
Practical atheists don't give God a second thought.
Correct.
But Atheists do give bible thumping idiots with pretensions of telling
Atheists who they are and what they should think a fair amount of
thought.
They are the ones I worry about.
Fundies trying to present their beliefs are truth - and trying to force
it on others - are the ones *I* worry about. ps Dad says 'stop it'.
You on the other hand would rather come here and attempt to spit in
your God's eye than acknowledge him.
Since Atheists don't believe in your god (or anyone else's god) they'll
just have to settle for spitting in YOUR eye. Hope that's okay by you?
That is pitiful.
It'd be a lot better for you - and the atheists - if you simply shut up
about atheists and evolution and stuck to arguing about god, how many
angels can dance on the head of a pin and other likewise (pointless but
harmless) pursuits.
Hop on over to the pink unicorn newsgroups.
Tell you what, you stop spouting fundie dogma about matters you're sure
as hell unqualified to and we'll stop telling you you're an idiot.
They're missing an idiot.
Weak. Very weak.
Try this on for size, fundie -"You're an example of what a poor
education, religious fundamentalist upbringing and a lack of desire to
better the world around you yields; ignorance wrapped in a hateful
dogma."
Wash my FEET, fundie!
Jesus!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 11:14:22 PM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Richard Dawkins
(Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"Soul food" <cthulhu@soulstogo.com> wrote in message
news:n7s2l1996rm2dbie915h0a2j8m1g95teua@4ax.com...
Into alt.atheism shot "Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com>
and breathlessly exclaimed:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Can anybody spot the problem with the above posting?
------------------------------------------------
"If iron chariots make people immune to God (Judges 1:19), why do
Christians drive cars?"
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
If you are insinuating that I could care less by answering his
duncescreed you are incorrect.
Just because I reply to a thread doesn't mean that I could give a
damn. Now take you for instance.
You are in Christian newsgroups because you hate God.
Are you there for the same reason? No? Then how do you know why an
atheist is in a Christian NG? Let's see, could it be for the same reason
Christians come into an atheist NG? Do you hate "nogod"?
Idiot.
Now answer me this: why do you think an atheist, who doesn't believe in
"god", would hate this concept he doesn't believe in? I mean, why waste
the time?
That needs to be clarified first.
Second,you are not a practical atheist.
Practical atheists don't give God a second thought.
Now there's a new term. Practical Atheist. I like it. Are they the
ones that just shut themselves up into their homes when the religious
right attempts to take away their human rights? No, I don't think so. I
find it rather practical to take a fucking stand against those who are
trying to make my country into a fucking theocracy, like fucking IRAN,
for crying out loud.
They are the ones I worry about.
You'd better, *****.
You on the other hand would rather come here and attempt to spit in
your God's eye than acknowledge him.
Hey moron. Were you bornagain yesterday? Atheists don't have a god,
who's eye is available for spitting into. Neither do you, for that
matter. Produce your god. Then we'll have a spitting contest.
That is pitiful.
Pathetic is a good word, and you fit it well.
<ad-hom nonsense snipped>
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
http://home.comcast.net/~vickman/
Today's example of Christian Love:
"1:19 And the LORD was with Judah; and he (JUDAH)drave out the
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 10:23:20 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Soul food" <cthulhu@soulstogo.com> wrote in message
Can anybody spot the problem with the above posting?
------------------------------------------------
"If iron chariots make people immune to God (Judges 1:19), why do
Christians drive cars?"
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
If you are insinuating that I could care less by answering his duncescreed
you are incorrect.
No, evidence demonstrates that *you* are the incorrect one.
Just because I reply to a thread doesn't mean that I could give a damn.
Of course it does, moron. Otherwise you would ignore it. The opposite
of hate isn't love, it's disinterest.
Now take you for instance.
You are in Christian newsgroups because you hate God.
Ha ha ha ha ha! You have to be such a colossal dunce to make a
statement like that, especially when you evidently cannot support a
thing you say - just like Disaster Dave, Boatwrong, Jabberhole and
Puke.
You cannot hate something that doesn't exist. You can hate the idiots
who try to make the lives of others miserable because they *do* believe
in something which evidently doesn't exist.
The reason my examples get posted to the groups that they do is that
Pastor Dave chose those groups in which to advertise his fraudulent
challenge to evolutionists. If he had kept it to a.a. alone, that's
the only place I would have responded. If others respond to this
thread and do not trim the header, then their messages will go to the
same groups Pastor Dave chose. It really is that simple. Just like
you, in fact.
That needs to be clarified first.
Like you know what *that* means.
Second,you are not a practical atheist.
All atheists are practical, by definition. It's the impractical ones
who are theists.
Practical atheists don't give God a second thought.
They are the ones I worry about.
Our thoughts are not on this fiction of yours, but upon the idiots who
post fraudulent challenges and unsupported statements (i.e. lies) in
a.a. If Pastor Dave had posted his fraud only in Christian groups, I
would never have seen it because I never go there. But he didn't. He
was so full of pride in his own blind stupidity that he cross-posted to
several Christian and Bible groups. He's entirely responsible for the
roof coming down on his head.
You on the other hand would rather come here and attempt to spit in your
God's eye than acknowledge him.
This fictional god has eyes? Kinda makes me wonder why he was
blundering blindly around the garden of Eden trying to find Adam that
day....
That is pitiful.
No, *you* are pitiful. You who claim to believe in god, who claim to
be a Christian and then *DO NOT TURN THE OTHER CHEEK AND DO NOT DO UNTO
OTHERS AS YOU WOULD BE DONE BY*.
In short, you're a flaming hypocrite just like Pastor Dave.
Hop on over to the pink unicorn newsgroups.
They're missing an idiot.
That would be you and rest assured, they're not missing you.
Now Pastor Dave started this. Did he or did he not specifically ask
for examples of macroevolution? Well, I'm just giving them to him. If
you're embarrassed by the thrashing he's getting, take it up with him
instead of advertising your own impotence and stupidity worldwide.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rick Heeke" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example551 |
16 Oct 2005 08:08:19 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Soul food" <cthulhu@soulstogo.com> wrote in message
news:n7s2l1996rm2dbie915h0a2j8m1g95teua@4ax.com...
Into alt.atheism shot "Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com>
and breathlessly exclaimed:
Hey fool, You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll. Give
it up. He could care less about you. Myself even more.
Can anybody spot the problem with the above posting?
------------------------------------------------ "If iron chariots
make people immune to God (Judges 1:19), why do Christians drive
cars?"
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
If you are insinuating that I could care less by answering his
duncescreed you are incorrect. Just because I reply to a thread
doesn't mean that I could give a damn. Now take you for instance.
You are in Christian newsgroups because you hate God.
You are delusional.
Second,you are not a practical atheist.
But you are.
Practical atheists don't give God a second thought.
You don't give *anything* the first thought, let alone a second one.
They are the ones I worry about.
You'd best worry about your own self.
You on the other hand would rather come here and attempt to spit in
your God's eye than acknowledge him.
Your theology is flawed. You aren't god.
That is pitiful.
You certainly are.
Hop on over to the pink unicorn newsgroups. They're missing an idiot.
Then you'd best get back there, IDiot.
--
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset.
to email me, concatenate the following:
nom de plume of Jay, Madison, Hamilton-The Federalist
(new, in Latin) at (this planet) dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
19 Oct 2005 12:38:52 PM |
|
|
"Soul food" <cthulhu@soulstogo.com> wrote in message
news:n7s2l1996rm2dbie915h0a2j8m1g95teua@4ax.com...
Into alt.atheism shot "Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com> and
breathlessly exclaimed:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Can anybody spot the problem with the above posting?
The statements in the post are contradictory. Of course Rayturd's entire
thought process is based on contradictions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 10:07:50 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Apparently not, or you wouldn't post assinine and cowardly messages
under the appropriated name of a fine scientist, would you now, dimwit?
And your name has been added to the growing list of those whose
impotence in refuting the examples is legendary.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 10:12:13 PM |
|
|
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1129432070.020155.70210@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Apparently not, or you wouldn't post assinine and cowardly messages
under the appropriated name of a fine scientist, would you now, dimwit?
And your name has been added to the growing list of those whose
impotence in refuting the examples is legendary.
Budikka
Hey asswipe,
I don't read your posts.
I was just curious why you would post hump someone that killfiled you out of
your sheer lameness.
As a matter of fact don't even answer this beacuse I won't be reading it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
19 Oct 2005 12:41:10 PM |
|
|
"Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in message
news:gyj4f.86$SP4.7262@news.uswest.net...
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1129432070.020155.70210@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Apparently not, or you wouldn't post assinine and cowardly messages
under the appropriated name of a fine scientist, would you now, dimwit?
And your name has been added to the growing list of those whose
impotence in refuting the examples is legendary.
Budikka
Hey asswipe,
I don't read your posts.
I was just curious why you would post hump someone that killfiled you out
of your sheer lameness.
As a matter of fact don't even answer this beacuse I won't be reading it.
Hey Asswipe, don't steal my names! I know that you are one of the biggest
plagiarizers in Usenet but stay away from my stuff.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 11:19:59 PM |
|
|
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet Richard Dawkins
(Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com) made the light shine upon us with this:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1129432070.020155.70210@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Apparently not, or you wouldn't post assinine and cowardly messages
under the appropriated name of a fine scientist, would you now,
dimwit?
And your name has been added to the growing list of those whose
impotence in refuting the examples is legendary.
Budikka
Hey asswipe,
I don't read your posts.
Riiiight. And you don't respond to them either. Is lying the Christian
Way?
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
http://home.comcast.net/~vickman/
Today's example of Christian Love:
"1:19 And the LORD was with Judah; and he (JUDAH)drave out the
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 10:28:01 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
Hey asswipe,
I don't read your posts.
Of course you do, shitrag, you just read this and couldn't even keep it
in your pants, you had to respond knee-jerk fashion. Why don't you go
change your underwear and then try seriously to get a grip on reality?
Right now, all you're spinning your wheels and making useless smoke.
I was just curious why you would post hump someone that killfiled you out of
your sheer lameness.
Pity you cannot support your lies any better than Disaster Dave, isn't
it? He asked for the examples. I'm just responding to his request for
help, as any good Samaritan would do. If you have a problem with that,
why don't you get on his case about posting idiotic fraudulent troll
challenges to a.a.?
As a matter of fact don't even answer this beacuse I won't be reading it.
Good, then I won't have to *****-slap you any more, will I?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rick Heeke" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example551 |
16 Oct 2005 08:20:19 PM |
|
|
Budikka666 wrote:
Richard Dawkins wrote:
Hey fool,
You've been killffiled for being a venomous troll.
Give it up.
He could care less about you.
Myself even more.
Apparently not, or you wouldn't post assinine and cowardly messages
under the appropriated name of a fine scientist, would you now, dimwit?
And your name has been added to the growing list of those whose
impotence in refuting the examples is legendary.
Budikka
***** Dork and Pesty Dave are butt buddies, neither of whom can generate
a coherent thought, or a valid argument. Dawk is especially good at ad
hominem type responses, but has trouble conversing civilly, and passing
gas, but he may possibly master such skills in another 50 years.
His latest schtick is to parrot the criticism directed at him from the
previous post, which usually is a scathing rebuttal of the cut-and-paste
that he posted without understanding what it was.
--
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset.
to email me, concatenate the following:
nom de plume of Jay, Madison, Hamilton-The Federalist
(new, in Latin) at (this planet) dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "****Glorious Heaven:****" |
|
| Title: Re: Detailed Evidence of Macroevolution for Pastor Dave - Example 551 |
15 Oct 2005 05:29:10 PM |
|
|
I agree with you!!
::::::::: My Biography:::::::::
http://newlanrkshire.blogspot.com/
:::::::::Robert Owen & Lanarkshire:::::::::
http://lanarkshire1.blogspot.com/
http://cultureuk.blogspot.com/
http://gourock.blogspot.com/
http://photogourock.blogspot.com/
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1129393815.532758.265580@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Since I've now posted two threads which give Pastor Dave precisely what
he asked for in his challenge to evolutionists regarding so-called
macroevolution, and he ran away from the first (and I guarantee you he
will run away from the second), I'm now going back to posting
references to the material right in the first message:
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/pelycodus.html
"The dashed lines show the overall trend. The species at the
bottom is Pelycodus ralstoni, but at the top we find two species,
Notharctus nunienus and Notharctus venticolus. The two species later
became even more distinct, and the descendants of nunienus are now
labeled as genus Smilodectes instead of genus Notharctus.
"As you look from bottom to top, you will see that each group has
some overlap with what came before. There are no major breaks or sudden
jumps. And the form of the creatures was changing steadily."
I'm still waiting on even one scientific discussion of the evidence
I've presented or referenced in **OVER FIVE HUNDRED AND FIFTY
EXAMPLES**.
If you don't come through with your promise of a discussion instead of
running away every time, people are going to start believing your
macroevolution challenge was nothing but a fraud, Pastor Dave.
We can discuss this one or any one of the other specific examples I
gave, or you can keep running from them and be labeled a coward, a
liar, and a hypocrite. It's your choice how you will be remembered,
after all
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
