"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in
news:26nff.18$QI5.321@news.uswest.net:

The basis of a valid scientific theory is that it be able to explain
all the scientific data in the field it is concerned with and that no
evidence contradicting the theory be true. This is a harsh test, but
one which all legitimate scientific theories must pass. This is a test
which the theory of evolution has failed in spades as the following
abundantly shows.

While evolution continues to tell us that species transform themselves
in a simple almost magical manner, modern biology shows this not to be
the case. Organisms are so complex that for them to transform
themselves into different ones would require a theory of COevolution.
The random processes assumed by evolutionary theory deny such a
possibility.

Genes are just information encoded along a long string of the chemical
DNA; they cannot do anything themselves.
David Baltimore, Nobel Prize Winner


http://designeduniverse.com/articles/Evidence_Disproving_Evolution/evid
ence_disproving_evolution.html

Which pope or bishop issued you a plenary indulgence again?

Fencesitters, have fun with yet another demonstration of dorky's complete,
ludicrous ignorance of the basics of science.
Well, either that or, of course, fundie brat is lying again. Take a
guess... ;)

The basis of a valid scientific theory is that it be able to explain all
the scientific data in the field it is concerned with and that no
evidence
contradicting the theory be true.

http://designeduniverse.com/articles/Evidence_Disproving_Evolution/evidence_disproving_evolution.html

www.jesusneverexisted.com

--
Romans 2:24 revised:
"For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you
cretinists, as it is written on aig."

In article <26nff.18$QI5.321@news.uswest.net>, "Richard Dawkins"
<Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote:

The basis of a valid scientific theory is that it be able to explain all
the
scientific data in the field it is concerned with and that no evidence
contradicting the theory be true. This is a harsh test, but one which all
legitimate scientific theories must pass. This is a test which the theory
of
evolution has failed in spades as the following abundantly shows.

While evolution continues to tell us that species transform themselves in
a
simple almost magical manner, modern biology shows this not to be the
case.
Organisms are so complex that for them to transform themselves into
different ones would require a theory of COevolution. The random
processes
assumed by evolutionary theory deny such a possibility.

Genes are just information encoded along a long string of the chemical
DNA;
they cannot do anything themselves.
David Baltimore, Nobel Prize Winner

http://designeduniverse.com/articles/Evidence_Disproving_Evolution/evidence_disproving_evolution.html
___________________________________________________________________

Have you noticed that it is the same bunch of poor lost souls who try and
attack you. They never speak to what you post but only attack you
personally. It wouldn't matter what you say they are like the piranha in a
feeding frenzy. They are unstable in all their ways James 1:8

Wish I could find fish like that when I go fishing-bite on everything....

Richard Dawkins wrote:

The basis of a valid scientific theory is that it be able to explain all
the
scientific data in the field it is concerned with and that no evidence
contradicting the theory be true.

===>This is totally false and shows the typical ignorance of science
by Creationists who attempt to "prove" their nonsense by trying to
"disprove" scientific theories about the phenomenon of Evolution. -- L.