| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
26 Nov 2004 12:33:52 PM |
| Object: |
"Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
Before Thanksgiving, I posed this response to an ongoing discussion
about the medical science "experts" of abortion. The egalitarians have
been deafing with their silence. Once again:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<yj3od.27472$jq5.26041@fe2.texas.rr.com>...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411210753.5f4aef86@posting.google.com...
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries.
Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message
news:<41b7ead6.98025824@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 20 Nov 2004 15:34:43 -0800,
Imbecilic Bigot "Jon Young"/"IBeb Getiner" spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:> >>
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensible to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
How do you know that this baby does not have conscience
awareness?
WHAT "baby?" ALL **babies** have been BORN, so any
discussion of them in here is totally irrelevant.
Terminology is not point conceded to you because you use bold letters.
The life inside the mother is a "Baby". Please don't tell me the
definition that someone else who thinks like you say's it must be.
As for FETUSES... medical science ha determined that prior to
the start of the 3rd trimester, inadequate brin architecture exists
for conscious awareness. And it is prorbal that NO elective abortions
**ever** are done during the third trimester. JAMA has documented
that only a mere 500 to 600 3rd-trimester abortions are performed
annually (out of 1,200,000 abortions in USA). They almost surely
ALL are due to medical exigencies, so fetal sentience is is never
an issue.
Who are these people of "medical science"? Most medical professionals
admit that the human brain is the one area of the human body that they
still don't fully understand. What your stating is the opinions of,
once again, people who think like you do.
Proving, again, that you wallow in your ignorance:
At 12 weeks:
~Facts:
At this stage of the pregnancy, the brain and nervous system are still in a
very early stage of development. The beginnings of the brain stem, which
includes a rudimentary thalamus and spinal cord, is being formed. Most brain
cells are not developed. Without a cerebral cortex (gray matter covering the
brain), pain impulses cannot be received or perceived.
The people of "medical science" that contributed to this:
Sally Faith Dorfman, MD
Assistant Professor, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Assistant Clinical
Professor, Mount Sinai
Hart Peterson, MD
Chief of Pediatric Neurology, New York Hospital, Clinical Professor of
Neurology in Pediatrics, Cornell University Medical Center
William Rashbaum, MD
Assistant Clinical Professor, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Seymour L. Romney, MD
Professor, Ob/Gyn, Director, Gynecological Cancer Research, and former
Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College
of Medicine
Allan Rosenfield, MD
Professor, Ob/Gyn and Public Health, Acting Chairman, Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology Director, Center for Population and Family Health,
College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
Herbert G. Vaughan, Jr. MD
Professor of Neuroscience, Neurology and Pediatrics, Director, Rose F.
Kennedy Center for Research in Mental Retardation and Human Development,
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Ming-Neng Yeh, MD
Associate Clinical Professor, Dept. of Ob/Gyn Ultrasound Laboratory,
Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center.
-0-0-
I'll take their word over yours any day. But I'll bet...now that a bunch of
DOCTORS have said something that *you* don't want to hear, you'll continue
down your path of abject stupidity.
Actually you have done more to prove my point than anything I could
have posted.
Your counter-point at first seems impressive but, thanks to Google, I
was able to conduct an easy research. You suprise me in that you say
you're a lawyer but you presented flimsy evidence with no
collaboration. The entire source of your post was :
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/abortion/silentscream.HTM. This was a
grand total of ONE page with only little excerpts of the actual
report. Most people are in fact guilty of this without realizing it.
You took at face value what you read on a single webpage. This panel
was convened by Planned Parenthood in order to examine the film "
Silent Scream ". Who placed these people on the panel? What were their
views before serving on the panel? Surely you're not going to tell us
that Planned Parenthood didn't have a bias as to how they wished this
report to read. Just as our government was able to pre-determine the
outcome of the " 9/11 report " or the " Warren Commision ", so to can
pro-choicers do the same with abortion issues. I've provide an
opposing point with it's own panel of well credentialed medical
experts.: http://www.gateway.org/content/helpdetails.htm#footnotes
Nobody can claim that they know for sure if a pre-born baby has
experienced conscience awareness or not. If you're right, the worst
consequence is people will have to take responsibility for their
actions if they carry to birth. If I'm right, to abort is to murder.
.
|
|
| User: "Michael Calwell" |
|
| Title: Re: "Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
26 Nov 2004 01:36:26 PM |
|
|
I've provide an
opposing point with it's own panel of well credentialed medical
experts.: http://www.gateway.org/content/helpdetails.htm#footnotes
Nobody can claim that they know for sure if a pre-born baby has
experienced conscience awareness or not. If you're right, the worst
consequence is people will have to take responsibility for their
actions if they carry to birth. If I'm right, to abort is to murder.
You know, I don't care whether the unborn child is conscious or sentient
or not. All that people whe seek to wrangle over the details of this are
trying to scrape up is excuses to kill them. I very much doubt the
newborn child experiences the world in any more meaningful a sense as an
8 week old unborn child.
But the point nonetheless remains that the pro-abortion lobby have told
lies with f*cking bells hanging off them about the sentience of unborn
children - and more than that, they knew it. How in the name of God can
you trust a profession that has conspired to decieve so many people
about the truth of their activities. What an absolutely shameful indictment.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Shawn Hearn" |
|
| Title: Re: "Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
27 Nov 2004 07:31:55 PM |
|
|
In article <41a7881d$0$1077$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>,
Michael Calwell <michael.calwell@btopenworld.com> wrote:
I've provide an
opposing point with it's own panel of well credentialed medical
experts.: http://www.gateway.org/content/helpdetails.htm#footnotes
Nobody can claim that they know for sure if a pre-born baby has
experienced conscience awareness or not. If you're right, the worst
consequence is people will have to take responsibility for their
actions if they carry to birth. If I'm right, to abort is to murder.
You know, I don't care whether the unborn child is conscious or sentient
or not. All that people whe seek to wrangle over the details of this are
trying to scrape up is excuses to kill them. I very much doubt the
newborn child experiences the world in any more meaningful a sense as an
8 week old unborn child.
But the point nonetheless remains that the pro-abortion lobby have told
lies with f*cking bells hanging off them about the sentience of unborn
children - and more than that, they knew it. How in the name of God can
you trust a profession that has conspired to decieve so many people
about the truth of their activities. What an absolutely shameful indictment.
You obviously are clueless about human development.
By the way, how many kids have you adopted?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: "Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
26 Nov 2004 05:29:51 PM |
|
|
Michael Calwell <michael.calwell@btopenworld.com> wrote:
I've provide an
opposing point with it's own panel of well credentialed medical
experts.: http://www.gateway.org/content/helpdetails.htm#footnotes
Nobody can claim that they know for sure if a pre-born baby has
experienced conscience awareness or not. If you're right, the worst
consequence is people will have to take responsibility for their
actions if they carry to birth. If I'm right, to abort is to murder.
You know, I don't care whether the unborn child is conscious or sentient
or not. All that people whe seek to wrangle over the details of this are
trying to scrape up is excuses to kill them.
You're just looking for excuses to be a control freak. Women are not
your slaves, and you have no business ofrcing them to gestate and give
birth.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Anderson" |
|
| Title: Re: "Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
26 Nov 2004 02:58:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:36:26 +0000, Michael Calwell
<michael.calwell@btopenworld.com> wrote:
I've provide an
opposing point with it's own panel of well credentialed medical
experts.: http://www.gateway.org/content/helpdetails.htm#footnotes
Nobody can claim that they know for sure if a pre-born baby has
experienced conscience awareness or not. If you're right, the worst
consequence is people will have to take responsibility for their
actions if they carry to birth. If I'm right, to abort is to murder.
You know, I don't care whether the unborn child is conscious or sentient
or not.
You are a fucking liar. YOU introduce the claim that the unborn child
is sentient
All that people whe seek to wrangle over the details of this are
trying to scrape up is excuses to kill them.
More lies. There are few people trying to scrape up excuses to kill.
There 'details' are introduced by Pro-Lifers who seek to legislate
against abortion. Pro-Choice people merely are pointing out that the
Pro-Lifers are using lies and falsehoods and fallacies.
I very much doubt the
newborn child experiences the world in any more meaningful a sense as an
8 week old unborn child.
As a parent who observed his newborn child I am absolutely certain
that a newborn child is as sentient as you are. Having read about
embryo and fetal development I am equally sure that the prior to about
24 weeks that the fetus is physically incapable of sentience.
But the point nonetheless remains that the pro-abortion lobby have told
lies with f*cking bells hanging off them about the sentience of unborn
children - and more than that, they knew it. How in the name of God can
you trust a profession that has conspired to decieve so many people
about the truth of their activities. What an absolutely shameful indictment.
You constantly lie. How can we trust anything you say?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Walker" |
|
| Title: Re: "Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
26 Nov 2004 12:43:44 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411261033.10e45438@posting.google.com...
Before Thanksgiving, I posed this response to an ongoing discussion
about the medical science "experts" of abortion. The egalitarians have
been deafing with their silence. Once again:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:<yj3od.27472$jq5.26041@fe2.texas.rr.com>...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411210753.5f4aef86@posting.google.com...
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty
bigotries.
Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message
news:<41b7ead6.98025824@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 20 Nov 2004 15:34:43 -0800,
Imbecilic Bigot "Jon Young"/"IBeb Getiner" spewed:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:> >>
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensible to future
birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
How do you know that this baby does not have conscience
awareness?
WHAT "baby?" ALL **babies** have been BORN, so any
discussion of them in here is totally irrelevant.
Terminology is not point conceded to you because you use bold letters.
The life inside the mother is a "Baby". Please don't tell me the
definition that someone else who thinks like you say's it must be.
As for FETUSES... medical science ha determined that prior to
the start of the 3rd trimester, inadequate brin architecture exists
for conscious awareness. And it is prorbal that NO elective
abortions
**ever** are done during the third trimester. JAMA has documented
that only a mere 500 to 600 3rd-trimester abortions are performed
annually (out of 1,200,000 abortions in USA). They almost surely
ALL are due to medical exigencies, so fetal sentience is is never
an issue.
Who are these people of "medical science"? Most medical professionals
admit that the human brain is the one area of the human body that they
still don't fully understand. What your stating is the opinions of,
once again, people who think like you do.
Proving, again, that you wallow in your ignorance:
At 12 weeks:
~Facts:
At this stage of the pregnancy, the brain and nervous system are still
in a
very early stage of development. The beginnings of the brain stem, which
includes a rudimentary thalamus and spinal cord, is being formed. Most
brain
cells are not developed. Without a cerebral cortex (gray matter covering
the
brain), pain impulses cannot be received or perceived.
The people of "medical science" that contributed to this:
Sally Faith Dorfman, MD
Assistant Professor, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Assistant
Clinical
Professor, Mount Sinai
Hart Peterson, MD
Chief of Pediatric Neurology, New York Hospital, Clinical Professor of
Neurology in Pediatrics, Cornell University Medical Center
William Rashbaum, MD
Assistant Clinical Professor, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Seymour L. Romney, MD
Professor, Ob/Gyn, Director, Gynecological Cancer Research, and former
Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein
College
of Medicine
Allan Rosenfield, MD
Professor, Ob/Gyn and Public Health, Acting Chairman, Department of
Obstetrics and Gynecology Director, Center for Population and Family
Health,
College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
Herbert G. Vaughan, Jr. MD
Professor of Neuroscience, Neurology and Pediatrics, Director, Rose F.
Kennedy Center for Research in Mental Retardation and Human Development,
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Ming-Neng Yeh, MD
Associate Clinical Professor, Dept. of Ob/Gyn Ultrasound Laboratory,
Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center.
-0-0-
I'll take their word over yours any day. But I'll bet...now that a bunch
of
DOCTORS have said something that *you* don't want to hear, you'll
continue
down your path of abject stupidity.
Actually you have done more to prove my point than anything I could
have posted.
Your counter-point at first seems impressive but, thanks to Google, I
was able to conduct an easy research. You suprise me in that you say
you're a lawyer but you presented flimsy evidence with no
collaboration. The entire source of your post was :
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/abortion/silentscream.HTM. This was a
grand total of ONE page with only little excerpts of the actual
report. Most people are in fact guilty of this without realizing it.
You took at face value what you read on a single webpage. This panel
was convened by Planned Parenthood in order to examine the film "
Silent Scream ". Who placed these people on the panel? What were their
views before serving on the panel? Surely you're not going to tell us
that Planned Parenthood didn't have a bias as to how they wished this
report to read. Just as our government was able to pre-determine the
outcome of the " 9/11 report " or the " Warren Commision ", so to can
pro-choicers do the same with abortion issues. I've provide an
opposing point with it's own panel of well credentialed medical
experts.: http://www.gateway.org/content/helpdetails.htm#footnotes
Nobody can claim that they know for sure if a pre-born baby has
experienced conscience awareness or not. If you're right, the worst
consequence is people will have to take responsibility for their
actions if they carry to birth. If I'm right, to abort is to murder.
You are the insane idiot that also posted some kind of mealy mouthed
Thankgiving greeting which embraced all kinds of ideals which you oppose,
like this.. during the other 364 days of the year..
Nothing in the links that you've provided is unbiased and nothing is claimed
which establishes the beginning conception of life..
The idea that someone has failed to respond to each one of your own moronic
positions is foolish.. Since women commenced conceiving babies.. there has
always been a mechanism for abortion.. provided by nature itself.. That
natural process has always been known as miscarriage..
Abortion for contraceptive purposes is not being argued .. Abortion for
health and welfare reasons are the issue.. You abject confusion is not lack
of information but deplorable ignorance.. STFU.. the only one impressed by
your idiotic nonsense is you..
Bill Walker
Irving, Tx.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: "Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
27 Nov 2004 02:16:55 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411261033.10e45438@posting.google.com...
I know that you're a self-absorbed *****, but the least you could do is
have a fucking life so you'll recognize the appearance of one.
Currently on my plate:
1.) We are hitting the home stretch for finals. Remember in my profile where
it said "I've returned to school after a 20-ish year hiatus, " or do you
just post your ***** without reading it? And since I will not be in class for
the last two days, I have an extra workload to take my finals early and
complete some reports/writing assignments;
2.) For Thanksgiving, we went to the home of a friend and fellow
firefighter, as did a number of other firefighters. The friend is Johnny
Carino, and there was no way in hell I was going to miss his cooking;
3.) I've been finishing the engine installation for my Blazer. It's an '81
4x4 mudhog with (now) a '94 model 350. In fact, I just took a break to
download some email I was expecting;
4.) The weather has been stunning, and I've spent time with my wife in the
hill country in our convertible;
5.) I have a couple of major projects for a client that I'm finishing up;
6.) I'm certain that I've missed something....
Yes, your reply is in the works. Unlike you fuckwads, I do not speak in
sound bites, and my replies do not come from bumper stickers.
I know you've sat glued to your computer waiting for my reply, but that's
because you have a shithole of an existence. Here's a couple more dates for
you to put on your calendar: I won't be anywhere near a computer between
Dec. 8-13. You'll have to cope with your own pitiful shortcomings during
that time. Maybe you can pull up my profile and continue masturbating to my
picture since you have such an infatuation with it.
I, on the other hand, have a very fulfilling life, of which you don't even
enter the equation.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
27 Nov 2004 05:15:07 PM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:Xg5qd.49648$g21.49522@fe1.texas.rr.com...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411261033.10e45438@posting.google.com...
I know that you're a self-absorbed *****, but the least you could do
is
have a fucking life so you'll recognize the appearance of one.
Currently on my plate:
1.) We are hitting the home stretch for finals. Remember in my profile
where
it said "I've returned to school after a 20-ish year hiatus, " or do you
just post your ***** without reading it? And since I will not be in class
for
the last two days, I have an extra workload to take my finals early and
complete some reports/writing assignments;
2.) For Thanksgiving, we went to the home of a friend and fellow
firefighter, as did a number of other firefighters. The friend is Johnny
Carino, and there was no way in hell I was going to miss his cooking;
3.) I've been finishing the engine installation for my Blazer. It's an '81
4x4 mudhog with (now) a '94 model 350. In fact, I just took a break to
download some email I was expecting;
4.) The weather has been stunning, and I've spent time with my wife in the
hill country in our convertible;
5.) I have a couple of major projects for a client that I'm finishing up;
6.) I'm certain that I've missed something....
#6 Remembered:
I'm also hitting the home stretch for the completion of remodeling one of my
fire stations. I took the position of designer, spec writer, general
contractor, inspector, etc. We are having a haz-mat class in it on Dec 4 &
5, and there is still much to be done. We also spent this morning re-racking
the five-inch on the Engine at my station since it was loaded in a manner
that we found unsatisfactory.
--DMc
.
|
|
|
| User: "George Kerby" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
28 Nov 2004 09:56:08 AM |
|
|
Call for a big 10-74. Inotherwords: Tell someone who gives a *****,
devil-worshiper...
On 11/27/04 5:15 PM, in article %T7qd.54660$jq5.23783@fe2.texas.rr.com, "The
other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:Xg5qd.49648$g21.49522@fe1.texas.rr.com...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411261033.10e45438@posting.google.com...
I know that you're a self-absorbed *****, but the least you could do
is
have a fucking life so you'll recognize the appearance of one.
Currently on my plate:
1.) We are hitting the home stretch for finals. Remember in my profile
where
it said "I've returned to school after a 20-ish year hiatus, " or do you
just post your ***** without reading it? And since I will not be in class
for
the last two days, I have an extra workload to take my finals early and
complete some reports/writing assignments;
2.) For Thanksgiving, we went to the home of a friend and fellow
firefighter, as did a number of other firefighters. The friend is Johnny
Carino, and there was no way in hell I was going to miss his cooking;
3.) I've been finishing the engine installation for my Blazer. It's an '81
4x4 mudhog with (now) a '94 model 350. In fact, I just took a break to
download some email I was expecting;
4.) The weather has been stunning, and I've spent time with my wife in the
hill country in our convertible;
5.) I have a couple of major projects for a client that I'm finishing up;
6.) I'm certain that I've missed something....
#6 Remembered:
I'm also hitting the home stretch for the completion of remodeling one of my
fire stations. I took the position of designer, spec writer, general
contractor, inspector, etc. We are having a haz-mat class in it on Dec 4 &
5, and there is still much to be done. We also spent this morning re-racking
the five-inch on the Engine at my station since it was loaded in a manner
that we found unsatisfactory.
--DMc
--
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child -
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
28 Nov 2004 10:51:49 PM |
|
|
George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<BDCF5138.BC96%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>...
Call for a big 10-74. Inotherwords: Tell someone who gives a *****,
devil-worshiper...
On 11/27/04 5:15 PM, in article %T7qd.54660$jq5.23783@fe2.texas.rr.com, "The
other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote:
< pure bullsh*t>
Rather sad, isn't it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
28 Nov 2004 11:25:41 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411282051.70dd71c3@posting.google.com...
George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<BDCF5138.BC96%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>...
Call for a big 10-74. Inotherwords: Tell someone who gives a *****,
devil-worshiper...
On 11/27/04 5:15 PM, in article %T7qd.54660$jq5.23783@fe2.texas.rr.com,
"The
other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote:
< pure bullsh*t>
Rather sad, isn't it?
You and your pathetic state of existence? It certainly is.
It must really suck to be you, knowing that you are inferior to me in every
way: the fulfilling life I live, the people I associate with, the people
that respect me, the intelligence and social level that you can only
fantasize about but is a daily occurance for me. You are the 'little people'
of this planet that will be wallowing in your shithole for the rest of your
miserable, second rate life.
But you've got your relative morals to keep you warm.
Here's a clue for you, fucktard: putting an asterisk in place of the "i" in
'*****' doesn't negat the profanity you stated. What is truly 'sad' is
that pussies like you somehow feel that one vowel somehow means you didn't
say the word.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
29 Nov 2004 08:11:58 AM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<ppyqd.54017$g21.17295@fe1.texas.rr.com>...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411282051.70dd71c3@posting.google.com...
George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<BDCF5138.BC96%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>...
Call for a big 10-74. Inotherwords: Tell someone who gives a *****,
devil-worshiper...
On 11/27/04 5:15 PM, in article %T7qd.54660$jq5.23783@fe2.texas.rr.com,
"The
other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote:
< pure bullsh*t>
Rather sad, isn't it?
Here's a clue for you, fucktard: putting an asterisk in place of the "i" in
'*****' doesn't negat the profanity you stated. What is truly 'sad' is
that pussies like you somehow feel that one vowel somehow means you didn't
say the word.
It means that I show respect for those who may read this post besides
you. You happen to be the most vulgar, foul-mouthed pig who posts to
Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
29 Nov 2004 09:02:01 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411290611.17573a7b@posting.google.com...
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:<ppyqd.54017$g21.17295@fe1.texas.rr.com>...
Here's a clue for you, fucktard: putting an asterisk in place of the "i"
in
'*****' doesn't negat the profanity you stated. What is truly 'sad' is
that pussies like you somehow feel that one vowel somehow means you
didn't say the word.
It means that I show respect for those who may read this post besides
you. You happen to be the most vulgar, foul-mouthed pig who posts to
Usenet.
LOL!
This, from the certified schitzophrenic who just made this post from
"IBen's" computer:
From: (J Young)
Subject: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine
Date: 29 Nov 2004 06:11:58 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.132
From: (IBen Getiner)
Subject: Look What the Bad People Do...
Date: 27 Nov 2004 20:50:38 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.132
LC~ Sure that when it comes to"vulgar, foul-mouthed pig('s)", "Jon" and his
'lil sockpuppet "IBen" are without peer.
"I'm a Goddamned Baptist."~"IBenJon", sharin' the Kristian love.
Lappcatt@aol.com (IBen Getiner)
Message-ID: <396a5984.0404142329.4b2d9b4d@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.116.134
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
29 Nov 2004 08:21:53 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411290611.17573a7b@posting.google.com...
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:<ppyqd.54017$g21.17295@fe1.texas.rr.com>...
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411282051.70dd71c3@posting.google.com...
George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<BDCF5138.BC96%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>...
Call for a big 10-74. Inotherwords: Tell someone who gives a *****,
devil-worshiper...
On 11/27/04 5:15 PM, in article
%T7qd.54660$jq5.23783@fe2.texas.rr.com,
"The
other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote:
< pure bullsh*t>
Rather sad, isn't it?
Here's a clue for you, fucktard: putting an asterisk in place of the "i"
in
'*****' doesn't negat the profanity you stated. What is truly 'sad'
is
that pussies like you somehow feel that one vowel somehow means you
didn't
say the word.
It means that I show respect for those who may read this post besides
you.
And your use of an asterisk suddenly makes everything o-fucking-kay? Where
did you get such a childish notion?
You happen to be the most vulgar, foul-mouthed pig who posts to
Usenet.
Doubtful, but I'll certainly chase down *the* most foul-mouthed *****
and either learn his tactics to live up to the high standard you expect of
me...
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
29 Nov 2004 09:29:52 AM |
|
|
On 29 Nov 2004 06:11:58 -0800, (J Young) wrote:
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<ppyqd.54017$g21.17295@fe1.texas.rr.com>...
"J Young" < > wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411282051.70dd71c3@posting.google.com...
George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<BDCF5138.BC96%ghost_topper@hotmail.com>...
Call for a big 10-74. Inotherwords: Tell someone who gives a *****,
devil-worshiper...
On 11/27/04 5:15 PM, in article %T7qd.54660$jq5.23783@fe2.texas.rr.com,
"The
other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote:
< pure bullsh*t>
Rather sad, isn't it?
Here's a clue for you, fucktard: putting an asterisk in place of the "i" in
'*****' doesn't negat the profanity you stated. What is truly 'sad' is
that pussies like you somehow feel that one vowel somehow means you didn't
say the word.
It means that I show respect for those who...
LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to get a fucking life -I'm living mine |
29 Nov 2004 07:26:25 AM |
|
|
On 28 Nov 2004 20:51:49 -0800, (J Young) wrote:
[...]
Rather sad, isn't it?
You might be less inclined to chase child-love if you had a normal,
moral life.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: "Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
27 Nov 2004 09:40:11 PM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<Xg5qd.49648$g21.49522@fe1.texas.rr.com>...
6.) I'm certain that I've missed something....
Yes, your reply is in the works.
That's the only part of your post that has any relevance. The rest is
self absorbed bullsh*t that no one gives a damn about.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Jon Young needs to buy a clue. |
28 Nov 2004 11:33:37 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411271940.157fe6b4@posting.google.com...
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:<Xg5qd.49648$g21.49522@fe1.texas.rr.com>...
6.) I'm certain that I've missed something....
Yes, your reply is in the works.
That's the only part of your post that has any relevance. The rest is
self absorbed bullsh*t that no one gives a damn about.
What parts?
The part where I told you that you have no fucking life except to monitor
this NG, anxiously awaiting my reply? ...or to show where I have a life that
doesn't involve a conceited dipshit like you?
You said I 'ducked' an argument. I showed you to be a stupid loser. Had I
merely replied with what you stated, you would have come back with your
usual litany of *****.
It is you, Jon, that is the egoistic fucktard that posted a message to this
NG snivelling that I didn't spend Thanksgiving Day replying to your message.
Also, it's pathetic that you can't even have an original thought. I stated
you were a "self-absorbed *****," and you just couldn't wait to use it
in a sentence. Monkey see, monkey do.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "J Young" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to buy a clue. |
29 Nov 2004 08:21:17 AM |
|
|
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<RZnqd.57328$jq5.46820@fe2.texas.rr.com>...
Also, it's pathetic that you can't even have an original thought. I stated
you were a "self-absorbed *****," and you just couldn't wait to use it
in a sentence. Monkey see, monkey do.
Are you really that stupid that you don't know when you're being
mocked? Obviously, because you didn't know it when your fellow
firefighters called you "Nails" and you couldn't figure it out now.
Jackass.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Jon Young needs to buy a clue. |
29 Nov 2004 08:28:03 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411290621.c96fd8@posting.google.com...
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:<RZnqd.57328$jq5.46820@fe2.texas.rr.com>...
Also, it's pathetic that you can't even have an original thought. I
stated
you were a "self-absorbed *****," and you just couldn't wait to use
it
in a sentence. Monkey see, monkey do.
Are you really that stupid that you don't know when you're being
mocked?
You're backpedalling, moron.
You're good at mimicking, but not worth a ***** at original thought, and this
isn't the first time you've done it, so your attempt to save your pride is
noted for what it is: futile.
Obviously, because you didn't know it when your fellow
firefighters called you "Nails" and you couldn't figure it out now.
You mean those same guys that follow me into a burning structure?
Or are you, once again, posting your lies while making smarmy, *****
remarks about ***** everyone should have a happy Thanksgiving?
Does your Sky Pixie know that you're a lying sack of *****?
Jackass.
Cumbubble.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "George Kerby" |
|
| Title: Re: "Donald" ducks an abortion debate |
28 Nov 2004 09:47:56 AM |
|
|
Thanks for the update. ALL of us were waiting with "baited" breath to be
informed of your activities, you pompous *****. Carly Simon wrote a song
about you, Nails...
On 11/27/04 2:16 PM, in article Xg5qd.49648$g21.49522@fe1.texas.rr.com, "The
other Donald" <the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> wrote:
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c2d0f9a.0411261033.10e45438@posting.google.com...
I know that you're a self-absorbed *****, but the least you could do is
have a fucking life so you'll recognize the appearance of one.
Currently on my plate:
1.) We are hitting the home stretch for finals. Remember in my profile where
it said "I've returned to school after a 20-ish year hiatus, " or do you
just post your ***** without reading it? And since I will not be in class for
the last two days, I have an extra workload to take my finals early and
complete some reports/writing assignments;
2.) For Thanksgiving, we went to the home of a friend and fellow
firefighter, as did a number of other firefighters. The friend is Johnny
Carino, and there was no way in hell I was going to miss his cooking;
3.) I've been finishing the engine installation for my Blazer. It's an '81
4x4 mudhog with (now) a '94 model 350. In fact, I just took a break to
download some email I was expecting;
4.) The weather has been stunning, and I've spent time with my wife in the
hill country in our convertible;
5.) I have a couple of major projects for a client that I'm finishing up;
6.) I'm certain that I've missed something....
Yes, your reply is in the works. Unlike you fuckwads, I do not speak in
sound bites, and my replies do not come from bumper stickers.
I know you've sat glued to your computer waiting for my reply, but that's
because you have a shithole of an existence. Here's a couple more dates for
you to put on your calendar: I won't be anywhere near a computer between
Dec. 8-13. You'll have to cope with your own pitiful shortcomings during
that time. Maybe you can pull up my profile and continue masturbating to my
picture since you have such an infatuation with it.
I, on the other hand, have a very fulfilling life, of which you don't even
enter the equation.
--
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child -
miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless.
Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." -- P.J. O'Rourke
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
