Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist



 Religions > Bible > Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "IknowHimDoYou"
Date: 21 Nov 2003 06:37:48 PM
Object: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist
Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist
In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest popularizer wrote:
"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies] rises little
above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which they are
genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the narrowest
bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that of the
more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically nearer to
the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must, therefore,
assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57
Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of evolutionary
religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.
.

User: "Thore Schmechtig"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 22 Nov 2003 12:23:21 AM

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books.

Ever took a look into these books? Of course not. Otherwise you would
have seen that this lie, told to you by your Führer, was as ridiculous
as all the others. You could have started to ask questions, and we
can't have that, can we? After all, a working brain is utterly
incompatible with fundyism... and so
I-know-nothing-except-to-obey-my-Führers-words plunges on down towards
the dark, hot, unpleasant place, condemning himself by lying, lying,
lying...
UNWRITTEN RULES OF FUNDAMENTALISM
1. "I'm right and you are wrong".
2. Never admit that you are wrong, even if you really are.
3. When you have nothing to say, hurl insults.
4. Regard and portray your own violence, whether physical,
psychological,
or verbal, at all times as defensive
5. Be prepared at all times to lie and bluster, particularly when backed
into a corner in an argument
6. Never accept responsibility for any mess you have personally caused.
7. When you are forced to admit to an error, regard the whole process of
error and correction as part of God's personal plan for you and not as a
something for which you should apologise retract or make amends except
verbally and secretly to God himself
8. Always see yourself and you personal actions as part of God's plans
for
the world. Recognise that even your errors are just part of Gods will
for
the betterment of mankind.
9.Profess humility but avoid the actual experience of it.
10.Refuse to take in information that differs from your own view and
oppose all such information through classification of such information
in
a derogatory and simplistic manner(eg by categorising it as left wing
propaganda)
11.Refuse to accept that truth is not black and white; that reality is
complex and there are shades of grey
12.Refuse to forgive anyone else for anything unless you purport to
forgive on behalf of other people unconnected with you for whom you
don't
have that right anyhow.
.
User: "John Kelley"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 22 Nov 2003 07:18:35 PM
"Thore Schmechtig" <WRITETOcommoner@carcosa.de> wrote in message news:<bpmvdj$1qju2o$2@ID-87341.news.uni-berlin.de>...

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books.


Ever took a look into these books? Of course not. Otherwise you would
have seen that this lie, told to you by your Führer, was as ridiculous
as all the others. You could have started to ask questions, and we
can't have that, can we? After all, a working brain is utterly
incompatible with fundyism... and so
I-know-nothing-except-to-obey-my-Führers-words plunges on down towards
the dark, hot, unpleasant place, condemning himself by lying, lying,
lying...

UNWRITTEN RULES OF FUNDAMENTALISM

You may be a fundamentalist atheist,if...
http://www.tektonics.org/fundyath.html
.
User: "Thore Schmechtig"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 22 Nov 2003 11:17:20 PM
Hi,

You may be a fundamentalist atheist,if... [link snipped]

As I'm no atheist, I can't be a fundy one ;)
--
Bye
Tocis (commoner AT carcosa DOT de)
Include HI-AK 523 in the subject or your email will be deleted!
.

User: "Adam Marczyk"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 23 Nov 2003 09:55:52 PM
John Kelley <jkelley@zoomnet.net> wrote in message
news:ce9e95d1.0311221718.4de5b355@posting.google.com...

"Thore Schmechtig" <WRITETOcommoner@carcosa.de> wrote in message
news:<bpmvdj$1qju2o$2@ID-87341.news.uni-berlin.de>...

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books.


Ever took a look into these books? Of course not. Otherwise you would
have seen that this lie, told to you by your Führer, was as ridiculous
as all the others. You could have started to ask questions, and we
can't have that, can we? After all, a working brain is utterly
incompatible with fundyism... and so
I-know-nothing-except-to-obey-my-Führers-words plunges on down towards
the dark, hot, unpleasant place, condemning himself by lying, lying,
lying...

UNWRITTEN RULES OF FUNDAMENTALISM

You may be a fundamentalist atheist,if...
http://www.tektonics.org/fundyath.html

And you may very likely be a fundamentalist Christian if you "refute" an
atheist site but refuse to link to it, so your readers have a much more
difficult time finding and viewing the original material for themselves.
--
"We have loved the stars too fondly | a.a. #2001
to be fearful of the night." | http://www.ebonmusings.org
--Tombstone epitaph of | e-mail: ebonmuse!hotmail.com
two amateur astronomers, | ICQ: 8777843
quoted in Carl Sagan's _Cosmos_ | PGP Key ID: 0x5C66F737
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.



User: "Michael"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 04:50:12 PM
In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest popularizer wrote:

"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies] rises little
above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which they are
genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the narrowest
bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that of the
more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically nearer to
the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must, therefore,
assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of evolutionary
religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.

Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried the 100
year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as 'proof' of
evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.
Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and Jews
[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond walking
upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along toward
his idea of utopia.
The real winner of the advocacy of racist Darwinism was Karl Marx who
applied the racism of Darwin to economics and government, which Stalin
used to put to the holocause 100 million Christians and Jews. Of course,
not to be outdone, China used Marxist Darwin theory to put to the
holocaust 200 million.
Not to be outdone, agreeing with Darwin's religious beliefs that some
human beings had not evolved as far as others and might not survive
natural selection, Adolph Hitler's evolutionary belief that some human
beings are not really human beings and their earlier fradulent opinion
in Dredd Scott a hundred years earlier that some human beings were really
not human beings, the Supremes were back at it again opining that some
human beings are not really human beings in Roe v Wade putting another 40
million non human beings to death at the altar of pagan sexual
immorality. (Read the opinion, it is a relgious opinion of pagan Greece
that they liked better than the Word of God)
Religious evolution, in its belief that humans are the product of the
fairy tale of the luck of the little gene that could, holds that there is
no purpose nor design to human life, and consider life to be expendable
for the greater good of the god of the state, and ignor the God of Life.
.
User: "Zachriel"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 04:59:58 PM
"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55...
<snipped>

Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.

Please retract this statement. The Dred Scott decision was in 1857. Darwin's
Theory of Evolution was first presented to the public in 1858. Neither
"Darwin" nor "evolution" appear in the Dred Scott decision.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 06:32:43 PM
"Zachriel" <angel@zachriel.com> wrote in message
news:84wwb.6969$jN2.2137520274@twister2.starband.net...


"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55...
<snipped>

Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


Please retract this statement. The Dred Scott decision was in 1857.

Darwin's

Theory of Evolution was first presented to the public in 1858. Neither
"Darwin" nor "evolution" appear in the Dred Scott decision.

Tom: Good catch Zach, I blew right by that. I think Burt really outdid
himself with this post. He ties together things that I had never heard
before. He must have had a bad day at fundie church.
.

User: "Adam Marczyk"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 06:04:28 PM
Zachriel <angel@zachriel.com> wrote in message
news:84wwb.6969$jN2.2137520274@twister2.starband.net...

"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55...
<snipped>

Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


Please retract this statement. The Dred Scott decision was in 1857.
Darwin's Theory of Evolution was first presented to the public in 1858.
Neither "Darwin" nor "evolution" appear in the Dred Scott decision.

While we're at it, Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto was written in late 1847
and published in 1848, more than ten years before the first publication of
the Origin of Species. But don't expect Michael to admit his error - after
all, when have creationists like him and IKHDY ever let the facts get in
the way of an argument they thought sounded good?
--
"We have loved the stars too fondly | a.a. #2001
to be fearful of the night." | http://www.ebonmusings.org
--Tombstone epitaph of | e-mail: ebonmuse!hotmail.com
two amateur astronomers, | ICQ: 8777843
quoted in Carl Sagan's _Cosmos_ | PGP Key ID: 0x5C66F737
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.

User: "Seppo Pietikainen"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 11:34:05 PM
Zachriel wrote:

"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55...
<snipped>

Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.



Please retract this statement. The Dred Scott decision was in 1857. Darwin's
Theory of Evolution was first presented to the public in 1858. Neither
"Darwin" nor "evolution" appear in the Dred Scott decision.



The giggling retard is a religious fundie.
It is sufficient for him to lie for his lord, remember,
Seppo P.
.

User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 05:12:33 PM
Zachriel wrote:

"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55...
<snipped>

Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


Please retract this statement. The Dred Scott decision was in 1857. Darwin's
Theory of Evolution was first presented to the public in 1858. Neither
"Darwin" nor "evolution" appear in the Dred Scott decision.

===>Don't confuse Lying Michael with the truth.
His last diagnosis showed a case of cerebral hyperdensity.
.

User: "Raymond E. Griffith"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 07:26:50 PM
in article 84wwb.6969$jN2.2137520274@twister2.starband.net, Zachriel at
angel@zachriel.com wrote on 11/24/03 5:59 PM:


"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55...
<snipped>

Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


Please retract this statement. The Dred Scott decision was in 1857. Darwin's
Theory of Evolution was first presented to the public in 1858. Neither
"Darwin" nor "evolution" appear in the Dred Scott decision.



Good catch. But he won't do it. After all, no truth is inexpendible in his
pursuit of ideology.
.


User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 06:30:30 PM
"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55...

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest popularizer

wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies] rises

little

above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which they

are

genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the narrowest
bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that of the
more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically nearer

to

the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must,

therefore,

assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of

evolutionary

religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.


Burt: Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried

the 100

year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as 'proof' of
evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.

Tom: Tee hee hee, yep they sure did. The most likely cause of this was the
lack of funds to secure good evolutionary science textbooks because of
repression by fundie idiots like Burt.

Burt: Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and Jews
[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond walking
upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along toward
his idea of utopia.

Tom: Tee hee hee, you mean Hitler, the Christian?

Burt: The real winner of the advocacy of racist Darwinism was Karl Marx who
applied the racism of Darwin to economics and government, which Stalin
used to put to the holocause 100 million Christians and Jews. Of course,
not to be outdone, China used Marxist Darwin theory to put to the
holocaust 200 million.

Tom: Tee hee hee, there are a lot of unsupported assertions in this
statement. Was evolution racist? I don't think so, but the Southern states
in the US used the bible to support their imprisonment and murder of blacks.

Burt: Not to be outdone, agreeing with Darwin's religious beliefs that some
human beings had not evolved as far as others and might not survive
natural selection, Adolph Hitler's evolutionary belief that some human
beings are not really human beings and their earlier fradulent opinion
in Dredd Scott a hundred years earlier that some human beings were really
not human beings, the Supremes were back at it again opining that some
human beings are not really human beings in Roe v Wade putting another 40
million non human beings to death at the altar of pagan sexual
immorality. (Read the opinion, it is a relgious opinion of pagan Greece
that they liked better than the Word of God)

Tom: Tee hee hee, I looked to find a sentence break in the diatribe above
but much to my amazement I found that all of those unsupported assertions
were made in one sentence. Burt, you are giving diatribes a bad name.

Burt: Religious evolution, in its belief that humans are the product of the
fairy tale of the luck of the little gene that could, holds that there is
no purpose nor design to human life, and consider life to be expendable
for the greater good of the god of the state, and ignor the God of Life.

Tom: Tee hee hee, this depth of the depravity of this entire post shows that
Burt has long since run out of intelligent comments. Why don't you leave
Burt, you won't embarrass yourself further and we don't have to feel
embarrassed for you.
For your information evolution is a science, nothing more. It doesn't
address the quality of life. To say lies like you have here is inexcusable.
You are nothing but a lying SOB for god.
By the way, your god is a figment of the imaginations of men. In your case,
your imagination is running wild.
.
User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 24 Nov 2003 07:03:30 PM
Tom wrote:

"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55...

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest popularizer

wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies] rises

little

above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which they

are

genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the narrowest
bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that of the
more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically nearer

to

the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must,

therefore,

assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of

evolutionary

religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.


Burt: Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried

the 100

year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as 'proof' of
evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


Tom: Tee hee hee, yep they sure did. The most likely cause of this was the
lack of funds to secure good evolutionary science textbooks because of
repression by fundie idiots like Burt.

Burt: Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and Jews
[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond walking
upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along toward
his idea of utopia.


Tom: Tee hee hee, you mean Hitler, the Christian?

===>Note that he is THEIR "old friend"!
.


User: "David Jensen"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 25 Nov 2003 08:52:45 AM
In alt.talk.creationism,
(Michael) wrote in
<mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55>:

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest popularizer wrote:

"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies] rises little
above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which they are
genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the narrowest
bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that of the
more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically nearer to
the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must, therefore,
assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of evolutionary
religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.


Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried the 100
year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as 'proof' of
evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.

This of course is a lie and it shows ignorance of history. I cannot
imagine that anyone saying this could be a Christian.

Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and Jews
[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond walking
upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along toward
his idea of utopia.

He misused anything he could get his hands on. Nothing in the theory of
evolution supported his claims. Don't forget that he also used
Christianity as an excuse to do this, too.

The real winner of the advocacy of racist Darwinism was Karl Marx who
applied the racism of Darwin to economics and government, which Stalin
used to put to the holocause 100 million Christians and Jews. Of course,
not to be outdone, China used Marxist Darwin theory to put to the
holocaust 200 million.

More ignorant nonsense. Nothing in the theory of evolution supports
this.

Not to be outdone, agreeing with Darwin's religious beliefs that some
human beings had not evolved as far as others and might not survive
natural selection, Adolph Hitler's evolutionary belief that some human
beings are not really human beings and their earlier fradulent opinion
in Dredd Scott a hundred years earlier that some human beings were really
not human beings, the Supremes were back at it again opining that some
human beings are not really human beings in Roe v Wade putting another 40
million non human beings to death at the altar of pagan sexual
immorality. (Read the opinion, it is a relgious opinion of pagan Greece
that they liked better than the Word of God)

Religious evolution, in its belief that humans are the product of the
fairy tale of the luck of the little gene that could, holds that there is
no purpose nor design to human life, and consider life to be expendable
for the greater good of the god of the state, and ignor the God of Life.

Your lies reflect badly on all Christians.
.
User: "Michael"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 11 Dec 2003 09:18:58 PM
In article <5tq6svsqootrhfprt839ti9mrgapnrn0fc@4ax.com>,
david@dajensen-family.com wrote:

In alt.talk.creationism,

(Michael) wrote in
<mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55>:

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest

popularizer wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies] rises little
above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which they are
genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the narrowest
bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that of the
more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically nearer to
the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must, therefore,
assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing capitulation.
These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and collage
biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of evolutionary
religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.


Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried the 100
year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as 'proof' of
evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners and
even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


This of course is a lie and it shows ignorance of history. I cannot
imagine that anyone saying this could be a Christian.

What is your specific and particular evidence that Haeckel, a proponent of
Darwins racist book The Preservation of the Favoured Races in the Struggle
for Life was not a racist, that Darwin was not a racist, or that Dredd
Scott has anything to do with the common law of the Constitution for the
united States of America?


Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and Jews
[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond walking
upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along toward
his idea of utopia.


He misused anything he could get his hands on. Nothing in the theory of
evolution supported his claims.

Tee hee hee, he believed that some people hadn't evolved as far as the
master race and used the principles of evolution to help the master race
along.
Don't forget that he also used

Christianity as an excuse to do this, too.

True, most radical religious left fundie athiesits are deceived through
Biblical illiteracy I suppose. He did not practice the principles of
Christianity, he practiced the principles of evolution however.


The real winner of the advocacy of racist Darwinism was Karl Marx who
applied the racism of Darwin to economics and government, which Stalin
used to put to the holocause 100 million Christians and Jews. Of course,
not to be outdone, China used Marxist Darwin theory to put to the
holocaust 200 million.


More ignorant nonsense. Nothing in the theory of evolution supports
this.

Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment, must by why Karl
Marx wanted to dedicate his book to Darwin, his inspiration.


Not to be outdone, agreeing with Darwin's religious beliefs that some
human beings had not evolved as far as others and might not survive
natural selection, Adolph Hitler's evolutionary belief that some human
beings are not really human beings and their earlier fradulent opinion
in Dredd Scott a hundred years earlier that some human beings were really
not human beings, the Supremes were back at it again opining that some
human beings are not really human beings in Roe v Wade putting another 40
million non human beings to death at the altar of pagan sexual
immorality. (Read the opinion, it is a relgious opinion of pagan Greece
that they liked better than the Word of God)

Religious evolution, in its belief that humans are the product of the
fairy tale of the luck of the little gene that could, holds that there is
no purpose nor design to human life, and consider life to be expendable
for the greater good of the god of the state, and ignor the God of Life.


Your lies reflect badly on all Christians.

Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 12 Dec 2003 08:30:22 AM
"Michael" <
> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1112032218570001@192.168.1.55...

In article <5tq6svsqootrhfprt839ti9mrgapnrn0fc@4ax.com>,
david@dajensen-family.com wrote:

In alt.talk.creationism,

(Michael) wrote in
<mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55>:

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest

popularizer wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies] rises

little

above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which

they are

genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the

narrowest

bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that of

the

more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically

nearer to

the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must,

therefore,

assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing

capitulation.

These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and

collage

biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of

evolutionary

religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.


Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried the

100

year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as 'proof'

of

evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners

and

even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


This of course is a lie and it shows ignorance of history. I cannot
imagine that anyone saying this could be a Christian.


Burt: What is your specific and particular evidence that Haeckel, a

proponent of

Darwins racist book The Preservation of the Favoured Races in the Struggle
for Life was not a racist, that Darwin was not a racist, or that Dredd
Scott has anything to do with the common law of the Constitution for the
united States of America?

Tom: Tee hee hee, you are the one with the racist claim, it is up to you to
provide the evidence. No wonder you lose every debate in which you engage.
You are not only ignorant of the basic facts you are also ignorant of the
basic procedures.

Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and

Jews

[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond

walking

upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along

toward

his idea of utopia.


He misused anything he could get his hands on. Nothing in the theory of
evolution supported his claims.


Burt: Tee hee hee, he believed that some people hadn't evolved as far as

the

master race and used the principles of evolution to help the master race
along.

Tom: Tee hee hee, you mean Hitler the Christian?


Don't forget that he also used

Christianity as an excuse to do this, too.


Burt: True, most radical religious left fundie athiesits are deceived

through

Biblical illiteracy I suppose. He did not practice the principles of
Christianity, he practiced the principles of evolution however.

Tom: Tee hee hee, accusations without basis. How do you practice the
"principles" of evolution, Burt?


The real winner of the advocacy of racist Darwinism was Karl Marx who
applied the racism of Darwin to economics and government, which Stalin
used to put to the holocause 100 million Christians and Jews. Of

course,

not to be outdone, China used Marxist Darwin theory to put to the
holocaust 200 million.


More ignorant nonsense. Nothing in the theory of evolution supports
this.


Burt: Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment, must by why

Karl

Marx wanted to dedicate his book to Darwin, his inspiration.

Tom: Tee hee hee, Burt, the ignorant ***** can't tell the difference between a
compliment and a criticism. Poor Burt. It really doesn't make any difference
why anyone wanted to do anything Burt, it still has nothing to do with the
TOE.

Not to be outdone, agreeing with Darwin's religious beliefs that some
human beings had not evolved as far as others and might not survive
natural selection, Adolph Hitler's evolutionary belief that some human
beings are not really human beings and their earlier fradulent

opinion

in Dredd Scott a hundred years earlier that some human beings were

really

not human beings, the Supremes were back at it again opining that some
human beings are not really human beings in Roe v Wade putting another

40

million non human beings to death at the altar of pagan sexual
immorality. (Read the opinion, it is a relgious opinion of pagan

Greece

that they liked better than the Word of God)

Religious evolution, in its belief that humans are the product of the
fairy tale of the luck of the little gene that could, holds that there

is

no purpose nor design to human life, and consider life to be expendable
for the greater good of the god of the state, and ignor the God of

Life.


Your lies reflect badly on all Christians.


Burt: Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment.

Tom: Tee hee hee, it doesn't make any difference who pays you the
compliment, you are a poor excuse for a Christian. I'm sure your god hides
his face in shame when your name is mentioned.
.
User: "Michael"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 16 Dec 2003 08:18:32 AM
In article <vtjk81sfaf769@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote:

"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1112032218570001@192.168.1.55...

In article <5tq6svsqootrhfprt839ti9mrgapnrn0fc@4ax.com>,
david@dajensen-family.com wrote:

In alt.talk.creationism,

(Michael) wrote in
<mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55>:

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest

popularizer wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies] rises

little

above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which

they are

genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the

narrowest

bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that of

the

more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically

nearer to

the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must,

therefore,

assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing

capitulation.

These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and

collage

biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of

evolutionary

religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.


Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried the

100

year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as 'proof'

of

evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave owners

and

even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating the
Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


This of course is a lie and it shows ignorance of history. I cannot
imagine that anyone saying this could be a Christian.


Burt: What is your specific and particular evidence that Haeckel, a

proponent of

Darwins racist book The Preservation of the Favoured Races in the Struggle
for Life was not a racist, that Darwin was not a racist, or that Dredd
Scott has anything to do with the common law of the Constitution for the
united States of America?


Tom: Tee hee hee, you are the one with the racist claim, it is up to you to
provide the evidence. No wonder you lose every debate in which you engage.
You are not only ignorant of the basic facts you are also ignorant of the
basic procedures.

Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.



Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and

Jews

[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond

walking

upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along

toward

his idea of utopia.


He misused anything he could get his hands on. Nothing in the theory of
evolution supported his claims.


Burt: Tee hee hee, he believed that some people hadn't evolved as far as

the

master race and used the principles of evolution to help the master race
along.


Tom: Tee hee hee, you mean Hitler the Christian?

Tee hee hee, satan's disciples often seek a position of deception, that is
why he is called the great deceiver, only the Biblically illiterate
however, are deceived.



Don't forget that he also used

Christianity as an excuse to do this, too.


Burt: True, most radical religious left fundie athiesits are deceived

through

Biblical illiteracy I suppose. He did not practice the principles of
Christianity, he practiced the principles of evolution however.


Tom: Tee hee hee, accusations without basis. How do you practice the
"principles" of evolution, Burt?

By helping the principles of natural selection along to evolve the master
race a wee bit faster and to exterminate those who have barely evolved
beyond the ape, according to Hitler. BTW, that is not a Christian
principle for God created all of the races, and He found that good.



The real winner of the advocacy of racist Darwinism was Karl Marx who
applied the racism of Darwin to economics and government, which Stalin
used to put to the holocause 100 million Christians and Jews. Of

course,

not to be outdone, China used Marxist Darwin theory to put to the
holocaust 200 million.


More ignorant nonsense. Nothing in the theory of evolution supports
this.


Burt: Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment, must by why

Karl

Marx wanted to dedicate his book to Darwin, his inspiration.


Tom: Tee hee hee, Burt, the ignorant ***** can't tell the difference between a
compliment and a criticism. Poor Burt.

Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.

It really doesn't make any difference
why anyone wanted to do anything Burt, it still has nothing to do with the
TOE.

So a fundie evolutionists would say.


Not to be outdone, agreeing with Darwin's religious beliefs that some
human beings had not evolved as far as others and might not survive
natural selection, Adolph Hitler's evolutionary belief that some human
beings are not really human beings and their earlier fradulent

opinion

in Dredd Scott a hundred years earlier that some human beings were

really

not human beings, the Supremes were back at it again opining that some
human beings are not really human beings in Roe v Wade putting another

40

million non human beings to death at the altar of pagan sexual
immorality. (Read the opinion, it is a relgious opinion of pagan

Greece

that they liked better than the Word of God)

Religious evolution, in its belief that humans are the product of the
fairy tale of the luck of the little gene that could, holds that there

is

no purpose nor design to human life, and consider life to be expendable
for the greater good of the god of the state, and ignor the God of

Life.


Your lies reflect badly on all Christians.


Burt: Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment.


Tom: Tee hee hee, it doesn't make any difference who pays you the
compliment, you are a poor excuse for a Christian. I'm sure your god hides
his face in shame when your name is mentioned.

Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 16 Dec 2003 09:21:46 AM
"Michael" <
> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1612030918340001@192.168.1.55...

In article <vtjk81sfaf769@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>

wrote:


"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1112032218570001@192.168.1.55...

In article <5tq6svsqootrhfprt839ti9mrgapnrn0fc@4ax.com>,
david@dajensen-family.com wrote:

In alt.talk.creationism,

(Michael) wrote in
<mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55>:

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest

popularizer wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies]

rises

little

above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which

they are

genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the

narrowest

bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that

of

the

more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically

nearer to

the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must,

therefore,

assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing

capitulation.

These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and

collage

biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of

evolutionary

religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.


Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried

the

100

year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as

'proof'

of

evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave

owners

and

even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating

the

Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


This of course is a lie and it shows ignorance of history. I cannot
imagine that anyone saying this could be a Christian.


Burt: What is your specific and particular evidence that Haeckel, a

proponent of

Darwins racist book The Preservation of the Favoured Races in the

Struggle

for Life was not a racist, that Darwin was not a racist, or that Dredd
Scott has anything to do with the common law of the Constitution for

the

united States of America?


Tom: Tee hee hee, you are the one with the racist claim, it is up to you

to

provide the evidence. No wonder you lose every debate in which you

engage.

You are not only ignorant of the basic facts you are also ignorant of

the

basic procedures.


Burt: Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.

Tom: Tee hee hee, yes the compliments just keep accumulating for you, you
ignorant oaf. I notice that you avoided providing the evidence.


Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and

Jews

[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond

walking

upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along

toward

his idea of utopia.


He misused anything he could get his hands on. Nothing in the theory

of

evolution supported his claims.


Burt: Tee hee hee, he believed that some people hadn't evolved as far

as

the

master race and used the principles of evolution to help the master

race

along.


Tom: Tee hee hee, you mean Hitler the Christian?


Burt: Tee hee hee, satan's disciples often seek a position of deception,

that is

why he is called the great deceiver, only the Biblically illiterate
however, are deceived.

Tom: Tee hee hee, you're the one who tried to deceive by linking evolution
to Hitler. I just pointed out that Hitler was a Christian and his SS troops
had that inscription on their belt buckles.


Don't forget that he also used

Christianity as an excuse to do this, too.


Burt: True, most radical religious left fundie athiesits are deceived

through

Biblical illiteracy I suppose. He did not practice the principles of
Christianity, he practiced the principles of evolution however.


Tom: Tee hee hee, accusations without basis. How do you practice the
"principles" of evolution, Burt?


Burt: By helping the principles of natural selection along to evolve the

master

race a wee bit faster and to exterminate those who have barely evolved
beyond the ape, according to Hitler. BTW, that is not a Christian
principle for God created all of the races, and He found that good.

Tom: Tee hee hee, how can you have a master race when there is no base with
which to create a master race. Hitler might have thought that, just as KKK
Christians think that if they exterminate the blacks they will advance their
own race. None of it is true and it doesn't lessen the religion of
Christianity anymore than it lessens the science of evolution. Only truly
ignorant asses such as yourself even think in such a manner and you will
find that it is always fundie creationist Christians who first mention the
subject. Doesn't say much for your "kind", does it Burt?



The real winner of the advocacy of racist Darwinism was Karl Marx

who

applied the racism of Darwin to economics and government, which

Stalin

used to put to the holocause 100 million Christians and Jews. Of

course,

not to be outdone, China used Marxist Darwin theory to put to the
holocaust 200 million.


More ignorant nonsense. Nothing in the theory of evolution supports
this.


Burt: Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment, must by

why

Karl

Marx wanted to dedicate his book to Darwin, his inspiration.


Tom: Tee hee hee, Burt, the ignorant ***** can't tell the difference

between a

compliment and a criticism. Poor Burt.


Burt: Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.

Tom: Tee hee hee, see, he really can't tell the difference. What a fool!

It really doesn't make any difference
why anyone wanted to do anything Burt, it still has nothing to do with

the

TOE.


Burt: So a fundie evolutionists would say.

Tom: Tee hee hee, so anyone would say who had an ounce of sensibility.

Not to be outdone, agreeing with Darwin's religious beliefs that

some

human beings had not evolved as far as others and might not survive
natural selection, Adolph Hitler's evolutionary belief that some

human

beings are not really human beings and their earlier fradulent

opinion

in Dredd Scott a hundred years earlier that some human beings were

really

not human beings, the Supremes were back at it again opining that

some

human beings are not really human beings in Roe v Wade putting

another

40

million non human beings to death at the altar of pagan sexual
immorality. (Read the opinion, it is a relgious opinion of pagan

Greece

that they liked better than the Word of God)

Religious evolution, in its belief that humans are the product of

the

fairy tale of the luck of the little gene that could, holds that

there

is

no purpose nor design to human life, and consider life to be

expendable

for the greater good of the god of the state, and ignor the God of

Life.


Your lies reflect badly on all Christians.


Burt: Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment.


Tom: Tee hee hee, it doesn't make any difference who pays you the
compliment, you are a poor excuse for a Christian. I'm sure your god

hides

his face in shame when your name is mentioned.


Burt: Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.

Tom: Tee hee hee, I am always happy to compliment such an ignorant *****.
.
User: "Michael"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 22 Dec 2003 04:16:48 PM
In article <vtu8oga0mvom3b@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1612030918340001@192.168.1.55...

In article <vtjk81sfaf769@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>

wrote:


"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1112032218570001@192.168.1.55...

In article <5tq6svsqootrhfprt839ti9mrgapnrn0fc@4ax.com>,
david@dajensen-family.com wrote:

In alt.talk.creationism,

(Michael) wrote in
<mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55>:

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest

popularizer wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies]

rises

little

above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with which

they are

genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within the

narrowest

bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of that

of

the

more intelligent animals...These lower rases are psychologically

nearer to

the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must,

therefore,

assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing

capitulation.

These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool and

collage

biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of

evolutionary

religionists in trying to breath life into their dead opinions.


Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific, carried

the

100

year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as

'proof'

of

evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave

owners

and

even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott, violating

the

Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject of
slavery.


This of course is a lie and it shows ignorance of history. I cannot
imagine that anyone saying this could be a Christian.


Burt: What is your specific and particular evidence that Haeckel, a

proponent of

Darwins racist book The Preservation of the Favoured Races in the

Struggle

for Life was not a racist, that Darwin was not a racist, or that Dredd
Scott has anything to do with the common law of the Constitution for

the

united States of America?


Tom: Tee hee hee, you are the one with the racist claim, it is up to you

to

provide the evidence. No wonder you lose every debate in which you

engage.

You are not only ignorant of the basic facts you are also ignorant of

the

basic procedures.


Burt: Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.


Tom: Tee hee hee, yes the compliments just keep accumulating for you, you
ignorant oaf. I notice that you avoided providing the evidence.

Too bent over in laughter from your compliments. Read Charlie's book and weep.



Even our old friend, Adolph liked evolution because it gave him the
'scientific' basis to put to the holocaust 6 million Christians and

Jews

[who afterall, according to Hitler, had barely evolved far beyond

walking

upright] and to help the natural selection of the master race along

toward

his idea of utopia.


He misused anything he could get his hands on. Nothing in the theory

of

evolution supported his claims.


Burt: Tee hee hee, he believed that some people hadn't evolved as far

as

the

master race and used the principles of evolution to help the master

race

along.


Tom: Tee hee hee, you mean Hitler the Christian?


Burt: Tee hee hee, satan's disciples often seek a position of deception,

that is

why he is called the great deceiver, only the Biblically illiterate
however, are deceived.


Tom: Tee hee hee, you're the one who tried to deceive by linking evolution
to Hitler.

Tee hee hee, he wasn't trying to prove that all men were created by God
who found it good.
I just pointed out that Hitler was a Christian and his SS troops

had that inscription on their belt buckles.

Tee hee hee, you believe everything Hitler said?



Don't forget that he also used

Christianity as an excuse to do this, too.


Burt: True, most radical religious left fundie athiesits are deceived

through

Biblical illiteracy I suppose. He did not practice the principles of
Christianity, he practiced the principles of evolution however.


Tom: Tee hee hee, accusations without basis. How do you practice the
"principles" of evolution, Burt?


Burt: By helping the principles of natural selection along to evolve the

master

race a wee bit faster and to exterminate those who have barely evolved
beyond the ape, according to Hitler. BTW, that is not a Christian
principle for God created all of the races, and He found that good.


Tom: Tee hee hee, how can you have a master race when there is no base with
which to create a master race. Hitler might have thought that, just as KKK
Christians think that if they exterminate the blacks they will advance their
own race. None of it is true and it doesn't lessen the religion of
Christianity anymore than it lessens the science of evolution. Only truly
ignorant asses such as yourself even think in such a manner and you will
find that it is always fundie creationist Christians who first mention the
subject. Doesn't say much for your "kind", does it Burt?

Coming from you, I accept the compliment.




The real winner of the advocacy of racist Darwinism was Karl Marx

who

applied the racism of Darwin to economics and government, which

Stalin

used to put to the holocause 100 million Christians and Jews. Of

course,

not to be outdone, China used Marxist Darwin theory to put to the
holocaust 200 million.


More ignorant nonsense. Nothing in the theory of evolution supports
this.


Burt: Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment, must by

why

Karl

Marx wanted to dedicate his book to Darwin, his inspiration.


Tom: Tee hee hee, Burt, the ignorant ***** can't tell the difference

between a

compliment and a criticism. Poor Burt.


Burt: Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.


Tom: Tee hee hee, see, he really can't tell the difference. What a fool!

Coming from you, it is a compliment. Thanks and Merry Christmas.


It really doesn't make any difference
why anyone wanted to do anything Burt, it still has nothing to do with

the

TOE.


Burt: So a fundie evolutionists would say.


Tom: Tee hee hee, so anyone would say who had an ounce of sensibility.

So, only fundie religious evolutionists would say it.


Not to be outdone, agreeing with Darwin's religious beliefs that

some

human beings had not evolved as far as others and might not survive
natural selection, Adolph Hitler's evolutionary belief that some

human

beings are not really human beings and their earlier fradulent

opinion

in Dredd Scott a hundred years earlier that some human beings were

really

not human beings, the Supremes were back at it again opining that

some

human beings are not really human beings in Roe v Wade putting

another

40

million non human beings to death at the altar of pagan sexual
immorality. (Read the opinion, it is a relgious opinion of pagan

Greece

that they liked better than the Word of God)

Religious evolution, in its belief that humans are the product of

the

fairy tale of the luck of the little gene that could, holds that

there

is

no purpose nor design to human life, and consider life to be

expendable

for the greater good of the god of the state, and ignor the God of

Life.


Your lies reflect badly on all Christians.


Burt: Tee hee hee, coming from you, I accept the compliment.


Tom: Tee hee hee, it doesn't make any difference who pays you the
compliment, you are a poor excuse for a Christian. I'm sure your god

hides

his face in shame when your name is mentioned.


Burt: Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.


Tom: Tee hee hee, I am always happy to compliment such an ignorant *****.

And I am always happy to accept your compliments. Merry Christmas Tom.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 22 Dec 2003 04:37:58 PM
"Michael" <
> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2212031716470001@192.168.1.55...

In article <vtu8oga0mvom3b@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1612030918340001@192.168.1.55...

In article <vtjk81sfaf769@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom"

<mmman_90@yahoo.com>

wrote:


"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1112032218570001@192.168.1.55...

In article <5tq6svsqootrhfprt839ti9mrgapnrn0fc@4ax.com>,
david@dajensen-family.com wrote:

In alt.talk.creationism,

(Michael) wrote

in

<mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55>:

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest

popularizer wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies]

rises

little

above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with

which

they are

genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within

the

narrowest

bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of

that

of

the

more intelligent animals...These lower rases are

psychologically

nearer to

the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we

must,

therefore,

assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing

capitulation.

These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool

and

collage

biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of

evolutionary

religionists in trying to breath life into their dead

opinions.


Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific,

carried

the

100

year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as

'proof'

of

evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave

owners

and

even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott,

violating

the

Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject

of

slavery.


This of course is a lie and it shows ignorance of history. I

cannot

imagine that anyone saying this could be a Christian.


Burt: What is your specific and particular evidence that Haeckel, a

proponent of

Darwins racist book The Preservation of the Favoured Races in the

Struggle

for Life was not a racist, that Darwin was not a racist, or that

Dredd

Scott has anything to do with the common law of the Constitution

for

the

united States of America?


Tom: Tee hee hee, you are the one with the racist claim, it is up to

you

to

provide the evidence. No wonder you lose every debate in which you

engage.

You are not only ignorant of the basic facts you are also ignorant

of

the

basic procedures.


Burt: Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.


Tom: Tee hee hee, yes the compliments just keep accumulating for you,

you

ignorant oaf. I notice that you avoided providing the evidence.


Burt: Too bent over in laughter from your compliments. Read Charlie's book

and >weep.
Tom: Tee hee hee, I have, and I've got a copy in my library that I have
loaned to a Southern Baptist from my church days. When he converts and
returns it, I'll loan it to you. The question is can you read it? It does
require a little intelligence and I doubt if you could understand it. See,
the compliments keep flowing.
< snip rest of unfounded assertions that Burt couldn't defend>
.
User: "Michael"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 28 Dec 2003 09:04:49 AM
In article <vuesi7sv6a4u09@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-2212031716470001@192.168.1.55...

In article <vtu8oga0mvom3b@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1612030918340001@192.168.1.55...

In article <vtjk81sfaf769@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom"

<mmman_90@yahoo.com>

wrote:


"Michael" <

> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-1112032218570001@192.168.1.55...

In article <5tq6svsqootrhfprt839ti9mrgapnrn0fc@4ax.com>,
david@dajensen-family.com wrote:

In alt.talk.creationism,

(Michael) wrote

in

<mikeburt-2411031750120001@192.168.1.55>:

In article <IknowHim-2111031637480001@pm8-02.kalama.com>,
IknowHim@leavingsoon.com (IknowHimDoYou) wrote:

Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist

In 1904 Haeckel, a zoologist in Germany, Darwin's greatiest

popularizer wrote:


"The mental life of savages[negroes, orientals, aboriginies]

rises

little

above that of the higher mammals, especially the apes, with

which

they are

genealogically connected...Their intelligence moves within

the

narrowest

bounds, and one can no more speak of their reason than of

that

of

the

more intelligent animals...These lower rases are

psychologically

nearer to

the mammals(apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we

must,

therefore,

assign a totally different value to their lives."
"The Wonders of Life" p 56-57

Heackel also fabricated the false embryo montage showing

capitulation.

These diagrams are even today remaining in many highschool

and

collage

biology text books. This shows the deceit and desperation of

evolutionary

religionists in trying to breath life into their dead

opinions.


Tee hee hee, some textbooks calling themselves scientific,

carried

the

100

year old fraudulent Heackel diagrams as late as the 1950's as

'proof'

of

evolution. Darwin's racist religious beliefs bolstered slave

owners

and

even embolded the US Supreme Court ot opine Dredd Scott,

violating

the

Constituion, God's Jubilee, and the common law on the subject

of

slavery.


This of course is a lie and it shows ignorance of history. I

cannot

imagine that anyone saying this could be a Christian.


Burt: What is your specific and particular evidence that Haeckel, a

proponent of

Darwins racist book The Preservation of the Favoured Races in the

Struggle

for Life was not a racist, that Darwin was not a racist, or that

Dredd

Scott has anything to do with the common law of the Constitution

for

the

united States of America?


Tom: Tee hee hee, you are the one with the racist claim, it is up to

you

to

provide the evidence. No wonder you lose every debate in which you

engage.

You are not only ignorant of the basic facts you are also ignorant

of

the

basic procedures.


Burt: Coming from you, I accept the compliment. Merry Christmas Tom.


Tom: Tee hee hee, yes the compliments just keep accumulating for you,

you

ignorant oaf. I notice that you avoided providing the evidence.


Burt: Too bent over in laughter from your compliments. Read Charlie's book

and >weep.

Tom: Tee hee hee, I have, and I've got a copy in my library that I have
loaned to a Southern Baptist from my church days. When he converts and
returns it, I'll loan it to you. The question is can you read it? It does
require a little intelligence and I doubt if you could understand it. See,
the compliments keep flowing.

And coming from you, the keep being accepted. Thanks, Tom.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 28 Dec 2003 04:34:39 PM
<snip for brevity>

Tom: Tee hee hee, yes the compliments just keep accumulating for

you,

you

ignorant oaf. I notice that you avoided providing the evidence.


Burt: Too bent over in laughter from your compliments. Read Charlie's

book

and >weep.

Tom: Tee hee hee, I have, and I've got a copy in my library that I have
loaned to a Southern Baptist from my church days. When he converts and
returns it, I'll loan it to you. The question is can you read it? It

does

require a little intelligence and I doubt if you could understand it.

See,

the compliments keep flowing.


Burt: And coming from you, the keep being accepted. Thanks, Tom.

Tom: Tee hee hee, I'll keep them coming you simpleton.
.
User: "Michael"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 02 Jan 2004 03:33:55 PM
In article <vuumk6q4u7ib1b@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

<snip for brevity>

Tom: Tee hee hee, yes the compliments just keep accumulating for

you,

you

ignorant oaf. I notice that you avoided providing the evidence.


Burt: Too bent over in laughter from your compliments. Read Charlie's

book

and >weep.

Tom: Tee hee hee, I have, and I've got a copy in my library that I have
loaned to a Southern Baptist from my church days. When he converts and
returns it, I'll loan it to you. The question is can you read it? It

does

require a little intelligence and I doubt if you could understand it.

See,

the compliments keep flowing.


Burt: And coming from you, the keep being accepted. Thanks, Tom.


Tom: Tee hee hee, I'll keep them coming you simpleton.

Thanks, I will keep accepting them.
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 02 Jan 2004 08:52:57 PM
"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-0201041633540001@192.168.1.55...

In article <vuumk6q4u7ib1b@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

<snip for brevity>

Tom: Tee hee hee, yes the compliments just keep accumulating for

you,

you

ignorant oaf. I notice that you avoided providing the evidence.


Burt: Too bent over in laughter from your compliments. Read

Charlie's

book

and >weep.

Tom: Tee hee hee, I have, and I've got a copy in my library that I

have

loaned to a Southern Baptist from my church days. When he converts

and

returns it, I'll loan it to you. The question is can you read it? It

does

require a little intelligence and I doubt if you could understand

it.

See,

the compliments keep flowing.


Burt: And coming from you, the keep being accepted. Thanks, Tom.


Tom: Tee hee hee, I'll keep them coming you simpleton.


Burt: Thanks, I will keep accepting them.

Tom: Tee hee hee, no problem, you simple *****.
.
User: "Michael"

Title: Re: Ernst Haeckel-Evolutionist/Racist 08 Jan 2004 10:33:53 PM
In article <vvcbk939k5tobb@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

"Michael" <mikeburt@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:mikeburt-0201041633540001@192.168.1.55...

In article <vuumk6q4u7ib1b@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com>
wrote:

<snip for brevity>

Tom: Tee hee hee, yes the compliments just keep accumulating for

you,

you

ignorant oaf. I notice that you avoided providing the evidence.


Burt: Too bent over in laughter from your compliments. Read

Charlie's

book

and >weep.

Tom: Tee hee hee, I have, and I've got a copy in my library that I

have

loaned to a Southern Baptist from my church days. When he converts

and

returns it, I'll loan it to you. The question is can you read it? It

does

require a little intelligence and I doubt if you could understand

it.

See,

the compliments keep flowing.


Burt: And coming from you, the keep being accepted. Thanks, Tom.