Faith cannot move mountains



 Religions > Bible > Faith cannot move mountains

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "Amangi Machque"
Date: 23 Mar 2006 05:39:51 AM
Object: Faith cannot move mountains
"Faith cannot move mountains (though generations of children are solemnly
told the contrary and believe it). But it is capable of driving people to
such dangerous folly that faith seems to me to qualify as a kind of mental
illness. It leads people to believe in whatever it is so strongly that in
extreme cases they are prepared to kill and to die for it without the need
for further justification." Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (New edition,
New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 198.
--
Machque
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past, Wisdom is of the
future." -Lumbee
"The one who tells the stories rules the world." -Hopi
"Sing your death song and die like a hero going home." -Shawnee
"A faith that cannot survive collision with the truth is not worth many
regrets." -Arthur C. Clarke
.

User: "jb"

Title: Re: Faith cannot move mountains 23 Mar 2006 07:11:35 AM
"Amangi Machque" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> wrote in message
news:jt-dnYtOSLeVFL_ZnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@comcast.com...

"Faith cannot move mountains (though generations of children are solemnly
told the contrary and believe it). But it is capable of driving people to
such dangerous folly that faith seems to me to qualify as a kind of mental
illness. It leads people to believe in whatever it is so strongly that in
extreme cases they are prepared to kill and to die for it without the need
for further justification." Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (New
edition,
New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 198.

This whole thing is a straw man argument. No one puts things together in
this manner. Some do believe in a sort of mind over matter like Christian
Scientists and other groups like Oral Roberts etc. faith healing for
miracles (of which there is documented evidence). Yet I have never seen
this scripture used by anyone to condone violence. Usually groups will use
the Old Testament to justify violence and a just war idea. Jesus and the
apostles taught Christians to turn the other cheek. Again the argument
given here is a straw man constructed with concepts that no Christians have
ever used in that way. (at least if they did it would be inconsistent-and
really not make sense) Faith was meant accomplish the action through
supernatural means and not by force which negates the rest of what Jesus
said.

--
Machque

"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past, Wisdom is of the
future." -Lumbee
"The one who tells the stories rules the world." -Hopi
"Sing your death song and die like a hero going home." -Shawnee

"A faith that cannot survive collision with the truth is not worth many
regrets." -Arthur C. Clarke


.
User: "Amangi Machque"

Title: Re: Faith cannot move mountains 23 Mar 2006 07:19:09 AM
"jb" wrote in
: "Amangi Machque" wrote
: > "Faith cannot move mountains (though generations of children are
solemnly
: > told the contrary and believe it). But it is capable of driving people
to
: > such dangerous folly that faith seems to me to qualify as a kind of
mental
: > illness. It leads people to believe in whatever it is so strongly that
in
: > extreme cases they are prepared to kill and to die for it without the
need
: > for further justification." Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (New
: > edition,
: > New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 198.
: >
: This whole thing is a straw man argument. No one puts things together in
: this manner.
What manner is that?
: Some do believe in a sort of mind over matter like Christian
: Scientists and other groups like Oral Roberts etc. faith healing for
: miracles (of which there is documented evidence).
And you can provide the documentation?
: Yet I have never seen
: this scripture used by anyone to condone violence.
Which scripture? The quote above isn't about a particular scripture; it is
about faith.
: Usually groups will use
: the Old Testament to justify violence and a just war idea. Jesus and the
: apostles taught Christians to turn the other cheek.
Sure they did. How much have you studied your new testament?
: Again the argument
: given here is a straw man constructed with concepts that no Christians
have
: ever used in that way.
*****. The inquisition and other progroms were instituted because
Christians didn't like others who didn't have the same faith that they had.
: (at least if they did it would be inconsistent-and
: really not make sense)
I agree that it doesn't make sense, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't
happen.
: Faith was meant accomplish the action through
: supernatural means and not by force which negates the rest of what Jesus
: said.
Oh really? You haven't studied your new testament much, have you?
--
Machque
"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past, Wisdom is of the
future." -Lumbee
"The one who tells the stories rules the world." -Hopi
"Sing your death song and die like a hero going home." -Shawnee
"A faith that cannot survive collision with the truth is not worth many
regrets." -Arthur C. Clarke
.
User: "jb"

Title: Re: Faith cannot move mountains 23 Mar 2006 07:51:47 AM
"Amangi Machque" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> wrote in message
news:zJqdnc1UOfjTPb_ZnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com...

"jb" wrote in
: "Amangi Machque" wrote
: > "Faith cannot move mountains (though generations of children are
solemnly
: > told the contrary and believe it). But it is capable of driving people
to
: > such dangerous folly that faith seems to me to qualify as a kind of
mental
: > illness. It leads people to believe in whatever it is so strongly that
in
: > extreme cases they are prepared to kill and to die for it without the
need
: > for further justification." Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (New
: > edition,
: > New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 198.
: >
: This whole thing is a straw man argument. No one puts things together
in
: this manner.

What manner is that?

: Some do believe in a sort of mind over matter like Christian
: Scientists and other groups like Oral Roberts etc. faith healing for
: miracles (of which there is documented evidence).

And you can provide the documentation?

: Yet I have never seen
: this scripture used by anyone to condone violence.

Which scripture? The quote above isn't about a particular scripture; it is
about faith.

: Usually groups will use
: the Old Testament to justify violence and a just war idea. Jesus and
the
: apostles taught Christians to turn the other cheek.

Sure they did. How much have you studied your new testament?

: Again the argument
: given here is a straw man constructed with concepts that no Christians
have
: ever used in that way.

*****. The inquisition and other progroms were instituted because
Christians didn't like others who didn't have the same faith that they
had.

: (at least if they did it would be inconsistent-and
: really not make sense)

I agree that it doesn't make sense, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't
happen.

You need to offer some proof darlin before you make such a wild and
unsubstanciated claim as this. A theist can make the same claim about God
but you would of course rightly reject it without some evidence. Yet I have
never seen this scripture used in this fashion.


: Faith was meant accomplish the action through
: supernatural means and not by force which negates the rest of what Jesus
: said.

Oh really? You haven't studied your new testament much, have you?

--
Machque

"Seek wisdom, not knowledge. Knowledge is of the past, Wisdom is of the
future." -Lumbee
"The one who tells the stories rules the world." -Hopi
"Sing your death song and die like a hero going home." -Shawnee

"A faith that cannot survive collision with the truth is not worth many
regrets." -Arthur C. Clarke


Amagi,
I am going to answer things below because frankly I see you have posted no
evidence to support your position so it would be senseless to try to
individually address your banter. First provide evidence from the New
Testament of a contextual support of violence. I know the New Testament
probably much better than you and know the Old Testament probably better
too:)but of course that is neither here nor there. I can find Old Testament
scriptures that condone war and capital punishment, but in the NT Jesus
revises some things which deal with that.
The Inquisition has little to do with the teachings of Jesus it was more
of a program to eliminate what they deemed subversive elements without
trial. You need to remember that other cultures and even atheists have done
this (atheistic Communist murdered millions) I don't really think there was
a basis in Christianity to support this-this was more a political maneuver
veiled in religious trappings. I could just as easily make this statement
as you have done yours:
Atheists condone violence and suppression because of the evidence in the
late Soviet Union and Marxist China yet this is wrong because it doesn't
clarify that not all atheists have the same political and social beliefs
(faith:) The straw man argument you have produced is worse than this
because Christians don't use that scripture to condone violence, but rather
to support miracles generally speaking. Moving a mountain is not something
humanly possible and therefore not something accomplished by human effort.
.

User: "jb"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 23 Mar 2006 08:15:55 AM
First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within the
framework of the Jewish religion(Amagi has consistently tried to deny this,
but we need to actually examine what Jesus was considered to have said):
Matthew 5:17-48 (NIV)
17 "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have
not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 I tell you the truth, until
heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of
a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is
accomplished. 19 Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments
and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of
heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called
great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you that unless your
righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law,
you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven. 21 "You have heard that
it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not murder, and anyone who murders
will be subject to judgment.' 22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry
with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his
brother, 'Raca, ' is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, 'You
fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell. 23 "Therefore, if you are
offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has
something against you, 24 leave your gift there in front of the altar. First
go and be reconciled to your brother; then come and offer your gift. 25
"Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do
it while you are still with him on the way, or he may hand you over to the
judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown
into prison. 26 I tell you the truth, you will not get out until you have
paid the last penny. 27 "You have heard that it was said, 'Do not commit
adultery.' 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has
already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye
causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to
lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell.
30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away.
It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body
to go into hell. 31 "It has been said, 'Anyone who divorces his wife must
give her a certificate of divorce.' 32 But I tell you that anyone who
divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become
an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.
33 "Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, 'Do not
break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.' 34 But I
tell you, Do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God's throne; 35
or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the
city of the Great King. 36 And do not swear by your head, for you cannot
make even one hair white or black. 37 Simply let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and
your 'No,' 'No'; anything beyond this comes from the evil one. 38 "You have
heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' 39 But I tell
you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right
cheek, turn to him the other also. 40 And if someone wants to sue you and
take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. 41 If someone forces you
to go one mile, go with him two miles. 42 Give to the one who asks you, and
do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you. 43 "You have
heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' 44 But I
tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that
you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the
evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46
If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the
tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your brothers, what are
you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect,
therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect."
What is important to not here is that this ends up with a returning good for
evil or something that literally goes beyond a mere non-violent stance to
one that loves ones enemies!
[1]
[1] The Holy Bible : New International Version. 1996, c1984 (electronic
ed.). Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
.
User: "Uncle Vic"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 23 Mar 2006 11:57:40 AM
Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet jb (jbenbo(4)@netscape.net)
made the light shine upon us with this:
<snip>
Jesus didn't say anything. He never wrote a word of the bible. The
gospels were written so long after the fact, and changed so many times
throughout history, they cannot be considered a reliable testimony that
even approaches history. The "word of god" is nothing more than the word
of moronic superstitious cave-dwelling goat herders.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
Atheists get to live their lives in accordance with their own desires. I
call that a win, compared to the collossal waste of time being an active
Christian. Atheist: win. Christian: lose. "No win" never comes into
play, because there are no gods.
.
User: "jb"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 23 Mar 2006 05:03:11 PM
"Uncle Vic" <address@withheld.com> wrote in message
news:Xns978F652137D47vicman@216.196.97.136...

Once upon a time in alt.atheism, dear sweet jb (jbenbo(4)@netscape.net)
made the light shine upon us with this:

<snip>

Jesus didn't say anything. He never wrote a word of the bible.

Again uncle vic, you need to read what I said and consider who and what I
was responding too. Let me refresh you. (Amagi has consistently tried to
deny this,
but we need to actually examine what Jesus was considered to have said) You
see I realized that some would question whether they were his words, but you
see for logic and reason's sake we must start with what record and words
Christians use in order to refute the nonsense (straw man argument) that
Amagi presented. No Christians I have ever heard of use that scripture the
way she is saying. So all you are saying below is really a moot issue.
The

gospels were written so long after the fact, and changed so many times
throughout history, they cannot be considered a reliable testimony that
even approaches history. The "word of god" is nothing more than the word
of moronic superstitious cave-dwelling goat herders.

--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011

.


User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 23 Mar 2006 06:47:32 PM
jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within the
framework of the Jewish religion

===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.
.
User: "jb"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 04:09:45 AM
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:442341A4.DC436A47@Nothing_But_The.Truth...



jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within the
framework of the Jewish religion


===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.

Yet the problem with your assertion is that you can make it without
examining the various sources which do mention him including the Jewish
talmud. People are making statements here providing no specific proof and
then demanding others prove it wrong. What you just said depends a lot on
what scholarly sources you use. Jesus is mentioned by historians and all
the cities are accurately discribed given other sources. There is a lot of
evidence, but you have to do your homework. Something people on this
newsgroup rarely do.


.
User: "Mary Hogan"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 07:41:07 AM
"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:ixPUf.118$Fl.4@fed1read09...


"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:442341A4.DC436A47@Nothing_But_The.Truth...



jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within the
framework of the Jewish religion

Absolutely incorrect, jb.
You cannot say the Yeshu was chet-less, sinless, unless you rip up the
halacha about embarrasing another Jew in public.
His actions in the Temple, although "Rocky-like," were absolutely horrid
according to halacha.
His actions on Shabbat were heinous.
His whole purpose was to undermine Torah.

===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical
evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.

Yet the problem with your assertion is that you can make it without
examining the various sources which do mention him including the Jewish
talmud. People are making statements here providing no specific proof and
then demanding others prove it wrong. What you just said depends a lot on
what scholarly sources you use. Jesus is mentioned by historians and all
the cities are accurately discribed given other sources. There is a lot
of evidence, but you have to do your homework. Something people on this
newsgroup rarely do.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
User: "Malcolm"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 26 Mar 2006 02:07:40 PM
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote


You cannot say the Yeshu was chet-less, sinless, unless you rip up the
halacha about embarrasing another Jew in public.

What incident are you thinking about here?
The only place where Jesus confronts another Jew with her sins is where He
meets the Samaritan woman at the well. She claims to have no husband, and
Jesus points out that she has had seven partners. However it is a private
conversation. Samaritans maybe don't count as Jews, anyway.
The other specific criticism of a named individual I can think of is where
Jesus refers to Herod as "that fox". That is probably meant as a sneering
comparison to the lion of Judah. However does the halacha extend to public
figures? Anyway, would Herod count as Jewish? The family converted so that
they could wield politcal power.
There are also very generalised criticism against the hypocritical scribes
and pharisees. However they are class comments.
The other case would be with the disciples. I doubt that this would count,
because the teacher has a licence to correct His own followers.
I cannot really place another incident.


His actions in the Temple, although "Rocky-like," were absolutely horrid
according to halacha.

Of course. You can only clean up the temple if you have some authority to
do so.


His actions on Shabbat were heinous.

To a non-Jew, they seem just common sense. However Jesus gives two
justifications "The sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath" and
"the Son of Man has authority even over the sabbath".
You can argue about the first. Jews themselves are divided, despite a
history of hostility to Jesus. The second point takes us back to the temple.


His whole purpose was to undermine Torah.

Maybe. Generally a blanket rejection - "Torah is ananthema, I command that
all worship the glorious Blidoolipoop!" is less effective than "within the
penumbra of meaning of the rights given in the Torah ... "
--
Buy my book 12 Common Atheist Arguments (refuted)
$1.25 download or $6.90 paper, available www.lulu.com
.

User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 09:03:07 AM
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143207492_2885@sp6iad.superfeed.net...


"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:ixPUf.118$Fl.4@fed1read09...


"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:442341A4.DC436A47@Nothing_But_The.Truth...



jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within the
framework of the Jewish religion



Absolutely incorrect, jb.

You cannot say the Yeshu was chet-less, sinless, unless you rip up the
halacha about embarrasing another Jew in public.

His actions in the Temple, although "Rocky-like," were absolutely horrid
according to halacha.

His actions on Shabbat were heinous.

His whole purpose was to undermine Torah.


===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical
evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.

Yet the problem with your assertion is that you can make it without
examining the various sources which do mention him including the Jewish
talmud. People are making statements here providing no specific proof
and then demanding others prove it wrong. What you just said depends a
lot on what scholarly sources you use. Jesus is mentioned by historians
and all the cities are accurately discribed given other sources. There
is a lot of evidence, but you have to do your homework. Something people
on this newsgroup rarely do.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----

.


User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 09:47:23 AM
jb wrote:

"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:442341A4.DC436A47@Nothing_But_The.Truth...



jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within the
framework of the Jewish religion


===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.

Yet the problem with your assertion is that you can make it without
examining the various sources which do mention him including the Jewish
talmud.

===>Oh, there are HUNDREDS of books written many years after
the supposed facts, but NONE of those constitute historical evidence.

People are making statements here providing no specific proof and
then demanding others prove it wrong. What you just said depends a lot on
what scholarly sources you use. Jesus is mentioned by historians

===>You are parroting the language of others.
You cannot name even ONE "historian" who mentioned "Jesus".

and all the cities are accurately discribed given other sources.

===>What "cities"???
Where do you get your misinformation?
Also, just because the Wizard of OZ describes Kansas and
a tornado, does that prove the Land of OZ and its Wizard exist?

There is a lot of
evidence, but you have to do your homework.

===>Which you obviously have not done,
that is why you make such a false claim.

Something people on this
newsgroup rarely do.

===>YOU being a prime example! -- L.
.

User: "jb"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 05:07:48 AM
more is known.
Confirmation by Non-Christian Historians. One popular misconceptions about
Jesus is that there is no mention of him in any ancient sources outside of
the Bible. On the contrary, there are numerous references to him as an
historical figure who died at the hand of Pontius Pilate. Some even noted
that he was reported to have risen from the dead, and was worshiped as a god
by all who followed him. Gary Habermas discusses these exhaustively.
Quotations from historians and other sources are found in the article New
Testament, Non-Christian Sources .
Evidence Relating to Jesus' Death. Three fascinating discoveries illuminate
the death of Christ and, to some degree, his resurrection. The first is an
unusual decree; the second is the body of another crucifixion victim.
The Nazareth Decree. A slab of stone was found in Nazareth in 1878,
inscribed with a decree from Emperor Claudius ( a.d . 41-54) that no graves
should be disturbed or bodies extracted or moved. This type of decree is not
uncommon, but the startling fact is that here "the offender [shall] be
sentenced to capital punishment on [the] charge of violation of [a]
sepulchre" (ibid., 155). Other notices warned of a fine, but death for
disturbing graves? A likely explanation is that Claudius, having heard of
the Christian doctrine of resurrection and Jesus' empty tomb while
investigating the riots of a.d . 49, decided not to let any such report
surface again. This would make sense in light of the Jewish argument that
the body had been stolen ( Matt. 28:11-15 ). This is early testimony to the
strong and persistent belief that Jesus rose from the dead.
Yohanan-A Crucifixion Victim. In 1968, an ancient burial site was uncovered
in Jerusalem containing about thirty-five bodies. It was determined that
most of these had suffered violent deaths in the Jewish uprising against
Rome in a.d . 70. One of these was a man named Yohanan Ben Ha'galgol. He was
about twenty-four to twenty-eight years old, had a cleft palate, and a
seven-inch nail was still driven through both his feet. The feet had been
turned outward so that the square nail could be hammered through at the
heel, just inside the Achilles tendon. This would have bowed the legs
outward as well so that they could not have been used for support on the
cross. The nail had gone through a wedge of acacia wood, then through the
heels, then into an olive wood beam. There was also evidence that similar
spikes had been put between the two bones of each lower arm. These had
caused the upper bones to be worn smooth as the victim repeatedly raised and
lowered himself to breathe (breathing is restricted with the arms raised).
Crucifixion victims had to lift themselves to free the chest muscles and,
when they grew too weak to do so, died by suffocation.
Yohanan's legs were crushed by a blow, consistent with the common use of the
Roman crucifragium ( John 19:31-32 ). Each of these details confirms the New
Testament description of crucifixion.
Much more textual and archaeological evidence supports the accuracy of the
New Testament ( see Christ, Death of ). But even these examples reveal the
extent to which archaeology has confirmed the truth of the Scriptures.
Archaeologist Nelson Glueck has boldly asserted that "it may be stated
categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a
biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which
confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the Bible"
(Glueck, 31).
Sources
W. F. Albright, "Retrospect and Prospect in New Testament Archaeology," in
E. J. Vardaman, ed., The Teacher's Yoke
F. F. Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?
N. Glueck, Rivers in the Desert
G. R. Habermas, The Verdict of History
C. J. Hemer, The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History , C. H.
Gempf, ed.
J. McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament
W. M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen
J. A. T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament
A. N. Sherwin-White, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament
C. A. Wilson, Rocks, Relics and Biblical Reliability
E. Yamauchi, The Stones and the Scriptur
Geisler, N. L. (1999). Baker encyclopedia of Christian apologetics. Baker
reference library (Page 48). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.
"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:ixPUf.118$Fl.4@fed1read09...


"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:442341A4.DC436A47@Nothing_But_The.Truth...



jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within the
framework of the Jewish religion


===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical
evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.

Yet the problem with your assertion is that you can make it without
examining the various sources which do mention him including the Jewish
talmud. People are making statements here providing no specific proof and
then demanding others prove it wrong. What you just said depends a lot on
what scholarly sources you use. Jesus is mentioned by historians and all
the cities are accurately discribed given other sources. There is a lot
of evidence, but you have to do your homework. Something people on this
newsgroup rarely do.




.
User: "Mary Hogan"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 07:44:06 AM
"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:HnQUf.122$Fl.48@fed1read09...


more is known.

Confirmation by Non-Christian Historians. One popular misconceptions about
Jesus is that there is no mention of him in any ancient sources outside of
the Bible. On the contrary, there are numerous references to him as an
historical figure who died at the hand of Pontius Pilate. Some even noted
that he was reported to have risen from the dead, and was worshiped as a
god by all who followed him. Gary Habermas discusses these exhaustively.
Quotations from historians and other sources are found in the article New
Testament, Non-Christian Sources .

I have spent years digging to find any sort of messiah...it is all wrong.
Some this, and some that...
Dangerous decisions you are manking, jb.


Evidence Relating to Jesus' Death. Three fascinating discoveries
illuminate the death of Christ and, to some degree, his resurrection. The
first is an unusual decree; the second is the body of another crucifixion
victim.

One thing about story tellers, they are so good, that you feel like you are
there.


The Nazareth Decree. A slab of stone was found in Nazareth in 1878,
inscribed with a decree from Emperor Claudius ( a.d . 41-54) that no
graves should be disturbed or bodies extracted or moved. This type of
decree is not uncommon, but the startling fact is that here "the offender
[shall] be sentenced to capital punishment on [the] charge of violation of
[a] sepulchre" (ibid., 155). Other notices warned of a fine, but death for
disturbing graves? A likely explanation is that Claudius, having heard of
the Christian doctrine of resurrection and Jesus' empty tomb while
investigating the riots of a.d . 49, decided not to let any such report
surface again. This would make sense in light of the Jewish argument that
the body had been stolen ( Matt. 28:11-15 ). This is early testimony to
the strong and persistent belief that Jesus rose from the dead.

Yohanan-A Crucifixion Victim. In 1968, an ancient burial site was
uncovered in Jerusalem containing about thirty-five bodies. It was
determined that most of these had suffered violent deaths in the Jewish
uprising against Rome in a.d . 70. One of these was a man named Yohanan
Ben Ha'galgol. He was about twenty-four to twenty-eight years old, had a
cleft palate, and a seven-inch nail was still driven through both his
feet. The feet had been turned outward so that the square nail could be
hammered through at the heel, just inside the Achilles tendon. This would
have bowed the legs outward as well so that they could not have been used
for support on the cross. The nail had gone through a wedge of acacia
wood, then through the heels, then into an olive wood beam. There was also
evidence that similar spikes had been put between the two bones of each
lower arm. These had caused the upper bones to be worn smooth as the
victim repeatedly raised and lowered himself to breathe (breathing is
restricted with the arms raised). Crucifixion victims had to lift
themselves to free the chest muscles and, when they grew too weak to do
so, died by suffocation.

Yohanan's legs were crushed by a blow, consistent with the common use of
the Roman crucifragium ( John 19:31-32 ). Each of these details confirms
the New Testament description of crucifixion.

Much more textual and archaeological evidence supports the accuracy of the
New Testament ( see Christ, Death of ). But even these examples reveal the
extent to which archaeology has confirmed the truth of the Scriptures.
Archaeologist Nelson Glueck has boldly asserted that "it may be stated
categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a
biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which
confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the
Bible" (Glueck, 31).

Sources

You can believe all of these sources of you can believe who the Messiah will
be, and what will occur during, before and after his arrival.
Yeshu was clearly not the messiah.


W. F. Albright, "Retrospect and Prospect in New Testament Archaeology," in
E. J. Vardaman, ed., The Teacher's Yoke

F. F. Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?

N. Glueck, Rivers in the Desert

G. R. Habermas, The Verdict of History

C. J. Hemer, The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History , C.
H. Gempf, ed.

J. McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament

W. M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen

J. A. T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament

A. N. Sherwin-White, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament

C. A. Wilson, Rocks, Relics and Biblical Reliability

E. Yamauchi, The Stones and the Scriptur

Geisler, N. L. (1999). Baker encyclopedia of Christian apologetics. Baker
reference library (Page 48). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.
"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:ixPUf.118$Fl.4@fed1read09...


"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:442341A4.DC436A47@Nothing_But_The.Truth...



jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within the
framework of the Jewish religion


===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical
evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.

Yet the problem with your assertion is that you can make it without
examining the various sources which do mention him including the Jewish
talmud. People are making statements here providing no specific proof
and then demanding others prove it wrong. What you just said depends a
lot on what scholarly sources you use. Jesus is mentioned by historians
and all the cities are accurately discribed given other sources. There
is a lot of evidence, but you have to do your homework. Something people
on this newsgroup rarely do.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 09:02:57 AM
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143207670_2889@sp6iad.superfeed.net...


"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:HnQUf.122$Fl.48@fed1read09...


more is known.

Confirmation by Non-Christian Historians. One popular misconceptions
about Jesus is that there is no mention of him in any ancient sources
outside of the Bible. On the contrary, there are numerous references to
him as an historical figure who died at the hand of Pontius Pilate. Some
even noted that he was reported to have risen from the dead, and was
worshiped as a god by all who followed him. Gary Habermas discusses these
exhaustively. Quotations from historians and other sources are found in
the article New Testament, Non-Christian Sources .


I have spent years digging to find any sort of messiah...it is all wrong.

Some this, and some that...

Dangerous decisions you are manking, jb.



Evidence Relating to Jesus' Death. Three fascinating discoveries
illuminate the death of Christ and, to some degree, his resurrection. The
first is an unusual decree; the second is the body of another crucifixion
victim.


One thing about story tellers, they are so good, that you feel like you
are there.


The Nazareth Decree. A slab of stone was found in Nazareth in 1878,
inscribed with a decree from Emperor Claudius ( a.d . 41-54) that no
graves should be disturbed or bodies extracted or moved. This type of
decree is not uncommon, but the startling fact is that here "the offender
[shall] be sentenced to capital punishment on [the] charge of violation
of [a] sepulchre" (ibid., 155). Other notices warned of a fine, but death
for disturbing graves? A likely explanation is that Claudius, having
heard of the Christian doctrine of resurrection and Jesus' empty tomb
while investigating the riots of a.d . 49, decided not to let any such
report surface again. This would make sense in light of the Jewish
argument that the body had been stolen ( Matt. 28:11-15 ). This is early
testimony to the strong and persistent belief that Jesus rose from the
dead.

Yohanan-A Crucifixion Victim. In 1968, an ancient burial site was
uncovered in Jerusalem containing about thirty-five bodies. It was
determined that most of these had suffered violent deaths in the Jewish
uprising against Rome in a.d . 70. One of these was a man named Yohanan
Ben Ha'galgol. He was about twenty-four to twenty-eight years old, had a
cleft palate, and a seven-inch nail was still driven through both his
feet. The feet had been turned outward so that the square nail could be
hammered through at the heel, just inside the Achilles tendon. This would
have bowed the legs outward as well so that they could not have been used
for support on the cross. The nail had gone through a wedge of acacia
wood, then through the heels, then into an olive wood beam. There was
also evidence that similar spikes had been put between the two bones of
each lower arm. These had caused the upper bones to be worn smooth as the
victim repeatedly raised and lowered himself to breathe (breathing is
restricted with the arms raised). Crucifixion victims had to lift
themselves to free the chest muscles and, when they grew too weak to do
so, died by suffocation.

Yohanan's legs were crushed by a blow, consistent with the common use of
the Roman crucifragium ( John 19:31-32 ). Each of these details confirms
the New Testament description of crucifixion.

Much more textual and archaeological evidence supports the accuracy of
the New Testament ( see Christ, Death of ). But even these examples
reveal the extent to which archaeology has confirmed the truth of the
Scriptures. Archaeologist Nelson Glueck has boldly asserted that "it may
be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever
controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have
been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical
statements in the Bible" (Glueck, 31).

Sources



You can believe all of these sources of you can believe who the Messiah
will be, and what will occur during, before and after his arrival.

Yeshu was clearly not the messiah.



W. F. Albright, "Retrospect and Prospect in New Testament Archaeology,"
in E. J. Vardaman, ed., The Teacher's Yoke

F. F. Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?

N. Glueck, Rivers in the Desert

G. R. Habermas, The Verdict of History

C. J. Hemer, The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History , C.
H. Gempf, ed.

J. McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament

W. M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen

J. A. T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament

A. N. Sherwin-White, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament

C. A. Wilson, Rocks, Relics and Biblical Reliability

E. Yamauchi, The Stones and the Scriptur

Geisler, N. L. (1999). Baker encyclopedia of Christian apologetics. Baker
reference library (Page 48). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.
"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:ixPUf.118$Fl.4@fed1read09...


"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:442341A4.DC436A47@Nothing_But_The.Truth...



jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within
the
framework of the Jewish religion


===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical
evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.

Yet the problem with your assertion is that you can make it without
examining the various sources which do mention him including the Jewish
talmud. People are making statements here providing no specific proof
and then demanding others prove it wrong. What you just said depends a
lot on what scholarly sources you use. Jesus is mentioned by historians
and all the cities are accurately discribed given other sources. There
is a lot of evidence, but you have to do your homework. Something
people on this newsgroup rarely do.









----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----

.

User: "Mary Hogan"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 08:02:52 AM
I need to clarify...I have spent years digging to find any sort of
Torah/Tanakh/Talmud to point to Yeshu as messiah.
I am in Sanhedrin..98 as we speak, I completely expect Messiah to come. The
son of David will be Messiah. When I said any sort of messiah, it was a
typo. I expect the true Messiah, with a little trepidation in that...it
"could" be rocky, depending on tshuvah.


I have spent years digging to find any sort of messiah...it is all wrong.

Some this, and some that...

Dangerous decisions you are manking, jb.



Evidence Relating to Jesus' Death. Three fascinating discoveries
illuminate the death of Christ and, to some degree, his resurrection. The
first is an unusual decree; the second is the body of another crucifixion
victim.


One thing about story tellers, they are so good, that you feel like you
are there.


The Nazareth Decree. A slab of stone was found in Nazareth in 1878,
inscribed with a decree from Emperor Claudius ( a.d . 41-54) that no
graves should be disturbed or bodies extracted or moved. This type of
decree is not uncommon, but the startling fact is that here "the offender
[shall] be sentenced to capital punishment on [the] charge of violation
of [a] sepulchre" (ibid., 155). Other notices warned of a fine, but death
for disturbing graves? A likely explanation is that Claudius, having
heard of the Christian doctrine of resurrection and Jesus' empty tomb
while investigating the riots of a.d . 49, decided not to let any such
report surface again. This would make sense in light of the Jewish
argument that the body had been stolen ( Matt. 28:11-15 ). This is early
testimony to the strong and persistent belief that Jesus rose from the
dead.

Yohanan-A Crucifixion Victim. In 1968, an ancient burial site was
uncovered in Jerusalem containing about thirty-five bodies. It was
determined that most of these had suffered violent deaths in the Jewish
uprising against Rome in a.d . 70. One of these was a man named Yohanan
Ben Ha'galgol. He was about twenty-four to twenty-eight years old, had a
cleft palate, and a seven-inch nail was still driven through both his
feet. The feet had been turned outward so that the square nail could be
hammered through at the heel, just inside the Achilles tendon. This would
have bowed the legs outward as well so that they could not have been used
for support on the cross. The nail had gone through a wedge of acacia
wood, then through the heels, then into an olive wood beam. There was
also evidence that similar spikes had been put between the two bones of
each lower arm. These had caused the upper bones to be worn smooth as the
victim repeatedly raised and lowered himself to breathe (breathing is
restricted with the arms raised). Crucifixion victims had to lift
themselves to free the chest muscles and, when they grew too weak to do
so, died by suffocation.

Yohanan's legs were crushed by a blow, consistent with the common use of
the Roman crucifragium ( John 19:31-32 ). Each of these details confirms
the New Testament description of crucifixion.

Much more textual and archaeological evidence supports the accuracy of
the New Testament ( see Christ, Death of ). But even these examples
reveal the extent to which archaeology has confirmed the truth of the
Scriptures. Archaeologist Nelson Glueck has boldly asserted that "it may
be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever
controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have
been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical
statements in the Bible" (Glueck, 31).

Sources



You can believe all of these sources of you can believe who the Messiah
will be, and what will occur during, before and after his arrival.

Yeshu was clearly not the messiah.



W. F. Albright, "Retrospect and Prospect in New Testament Archaeology,"
in E. J. Vardaman, ed., The Teacher's Yoke

F. F. Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?

N. Glueck, Rivers in the Desert

G. R. Habermas, The Verdict of History

C. J. Hemer, The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History , C.
H. Gempf, ed.

J. McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament

W. M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen

J. A. T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament

A. N. Sherwin-White, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament

C. A. Wilson, Rocks, Relics and Biblical Reliability

E. Yamauchi, The Stones and the Scriptur

Geisler, N. L. (1999). Baker encyclopedia of Christian apologetics. Baker
reference library (Page 48). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.
"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:ixPUf.118$Fl.4@fed1read09...


"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:442341A4.DC436A47@Nothing_But_The.Truth...



jb wrote:

First of all it is important to recognizes that Jesus taught within
the
framework of the Jewish religion


===>First of all it is important to realize there's no historical
evidence
for the existence of that teacher. -- L.

Yet the problem with your assertion is that you can make it without
examining the various sources which do mention him including the Jewish
talmud. People are making statements here providing no specific proof
and then demanding others prove it wrong. What you just said depends a
lot on what scholarly sources you use. Jesus is mentioned by historians
and all the cities are accurately discribed given other sources. There
is a lot of evidence, but you have to do your homework. Something
people on this newsgroup rarely do.









----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 12:01:42 PM
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143208797_2915@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

I need to clarify...I have spent years digging to find any sort of
Torah/Tanakh/Talmud to point to Yeshu as messiah.

I am in Sanhedrin..98 as we speak, I completely expect Messiah to come.
The son of David will be Messiah. When I said any sort of messiah, it was
a typo. I expect the true Messiah, with a little trepidation in that...it
"could" be rocky, depending on tshuvah.

Oh dear.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.


User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 03:43:51 PM
Mary Hogan wrote:

"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:HnQUf.122$Fl.48@fed1read09...


more is known.

Confirmation by Non-Christian Historians. One popular misconceptions about
Jesus is that there is no mention of him in any ancient sources outside of
the Bible. On the contrary, there are numerous references to him as an
historical figure who died at the hand of Pontius Pilate. Some even noted
that he was reported to have risen from the dead, and was worshiped as a
god by all who followed him. Gary Habermas discusses these exhaustively.
Quotations from historians and other sources are found in the article New
Testament, Non-Christian Sources .


I have spent years digging to find any sort of messiah...it is all wrong.

Some this, and some that...

Dangerous decisions you are manking, jb.


Evidence Relating to Jesus' Death. Three fascinating discoveries
illuminate the death of Christ and, to some degree, his resurrection. The
first is an unusual decree; the second is the body of another crucifixion
victim.


One thing about story tellers, they are so good, that you feel like you are
there.


The Nazareth Decree. A slab of stone was found in Nazareth in 1878,
inscribed with a decree from Emperor Claudius ( a.d . 41-54) that no
graves should be disturbed or bodies extracted or moved. This type of
decree is not uncommon, but the startling fact is that here "the offender
[shall] be sentenced to capital punishment on [the] charge of violation of
[a] sepulchre" (ibid., 155). Other notices warned of a fine, but death for
disturbing graves? A likely explanation is that Claudius, having heard of
the Christian doctrine of resurrection and Jesus' empty tomb while
investigating the riots of a.d . 49, decided not to let any such report
surface again. This would make sense in light of the Jewish argument that
the body had been stolen ( Matt. 28:11-15 ). This is early testimony to
the strong and persistent belief that Jesus rose from the dead.

Yohanan-A Crucifixion Victim. In 1968, an ancient burial site was
uncovered in Jerusalem containing about thirty-five bodies. It was
determined that most of these had suffered violent deaths in the Jewish
uprising against Rome in a.d . 70. One of these was a man named Yohanan
Ben Ha'galgol. He was about twenty-four to twenty-eight years old, had a
cleft palate, and a seven-inch nail was still driven through both his
feet. The feet had been turned outward so that the square nail could be
hammered through at the heel, just inside the Achilles tendon. This would
have bowed the legs outward as well so that they could not have been used
for support on the cross. The nail had gone through a wedge of acacia
wood, then through the heels, then into an olive wood beam. There was also
evidence that similar spikes had been put between the two bones of each
lower arm. These had caused the upper bones to be worn smooth as the
victim repeatedly raised and lowered himself to breathe (breathing is
restricted with the arms raised). Crucifixion victims had to lift
themselves to free the chest muscles and, when they grew too weak to do
so, died by suffocation.

Yohanan's legs were crushed by a blow, consistent with the common use of
the Roman crucifragium ( John 19:31-32 ). Each of these details confirms
the New Testament description of crucifixion.

Much more textual and archaeological evidence supports the accuracy of the
New Testament ( see Christ, Death of ). But even these examples reveal the
extent to which archaeology has confirmed the truth of the Scriptures.
Archaeologist Nelson Glueck has boldly asserted that "it may be stated
categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a
biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which
confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the
Bible" (Glueck, 31).

Sources


You can believe all of these sources of you can believe who the Messiah will
be, and what will occur during, before and after his arrival.

Yeshu was clearly not the messiah.

===>Furthermore, NONE of the above, nor any other citations they might
falsely invoke, give ANY evidence for the existence of a man named "Jesus". -- L.
.


User: "Amangi Machque"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 05:11:06 AM
"jb" wrote in message news:HnQUf.122$Fl.48@fed1read09...
:
: more is known.
:
: Confirmation by Non-Christian Historians. One popular misconceptions about
: Jesus is that there is no mention of him in any ancient sources outside of
: the Bible. On the contrary, there are numerous references to him as an
: historical figure who died at the hand of Pontius Pilate. Some even noted
: that he was reported to have risen from the dead, and was worshiped as a
god
: by all who followed him. Gary Habermas discusses these exhaustively.
: Quotations from historians and other sources are found in the article New
: Testament, Non-Christian Sources .
:
: Evidence Relating to Jesus' Death. Three fascinating discoveries
illuminate
: the death of Christ and, to some degree, his resurrection. The first is an
: unusual decree; the second is the body of another crucifixion victim.
:
: The Nazareth Decree. A slab of stone was found in Nazareth in 1878,
: inscribed with a decree from Emperor Claudius ( a.d . 41-54) that no
graves
: should be disturbed or bodies extracted or moved. This type of decree is
not
: uncommon, but the startling fact is that here "the offender [shall] be
: sentenced to capital punishment on [the] charge of violation of [a]
: sepulchre" (ibid., 155). Other notices warned of a fine, but death for
: disturbing graves? A likely explanation is that Claudius, having heard of
: the Christian doctrine of resurrection and Jesus' empty tomb while
: investigating the riots of a.d . 49, decided not to let any such report
: surface again. This would make sense in light of the Jewish argument that
: the body had been stolen ( Matt. 28:11-15 ). This is early testimony to
the
: strong and persistent belief that Jesus rose from the dead.
:
: Yohanan-A Crucifixion Victim. In 1968, an ancient burial site was
uncovered
: in Jerusalem containing about thirty-five bodies. It was determined that
: most of these had suffered violent deaths in the Jewish uprising against
: Rome in a.d . 70. One of these was a man named Yohanan Ben Ha'galgol. He
was
: about twenty-four to twenty-eight years old, had a cleft palate, and a
: seven-inch nail was still driven through both his feet. The feet had been
: turned outward so that the square nail could be hammered through at the
: heel, just inside the Achilles tendon. This would have bowed the legs
: outward as well so that they could not have been used for support on the
: cross. The nail had gone through a wedge of acacia wood, then through the
: heels, then into an olive wood beam. There was also evidence that similar
: spikes had been put between the two bones of each lower arm. These had
: caused the upper bones to be worn smooth as the victim repeatedly raised
and
: lowered himself to breathe (breathing is restricted with the arms raised).
: Crucifixion victims had to lift themselves to free the chest muscles and,
: when they grew too weak to do so, died by suffocation.
:
: Yohanan's legs were crushed by a blow, consistent with the common use of
the
: Roman crucifragium ( John 19:31-32 ). Each of these details confirms the
New
: Testament description of crucifixion.
:
: Much more textual and archaeological evidence supports the accuracy of the
: New Testament ( see Christ, Death of ). But even these examples reveal the
: extent to which archaeology has confirmed the truth of the Scriptures.
: Archaeologist Nelson Glueck has boldly asserted that "it may be stated
: categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a
: biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which
: confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the
Bible"
: (Glueck, 31).
:
: Sources
:
: W. F. Albright, "Retrospect and Prospect in New Testament Archaeology," in
: E. J. Vardaman, ed., The Teacher's Yoke
:
: F. F. Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?
:
: N. Glueck, Rivers in the Desert
:
: G. R. Habermas, The Verdict of History
:
: C. J. Hemer, The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History , C.
H.
: Gempf, ed.
:
: J. McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament
:
: W. M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen
:
: J. A. T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament
:
: A. N. Sherwin-White, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament
:
: C. A. Wilson, Rocks, Relics and Biblical Reliability
:
: E. Yamauchi, The Stones and the Scriptur
:
: Geisler, N. L. (1999). Baker encyclopedia of Christian apologetics. Baker
: reference library (Page 48). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.
Do you think that there may be the possibility of circular reasoning
involved in the conclusions of your biblical scholars?
--
Machque
"I think I'll believe in Gosh instead of God. If you don't believe in Gosh
too, you'll be darned to heck." -- anonymous
"He is YOUR God. They are YOUR Rules. YOU burn in Hell!" -- lapel button
"I don't mind born again Christians as long as they realize they don't get
twice as many rights." -- lapel button
"A faith that cannot survive collision with the truth is not worth many
regrets." -Arthur C. Clarke
.
User: "jb"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 06:58:22 AM
"Amangi Machque" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> wrote in message
news:LuKdnfCJUIBXTr7ZnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@comcast.com...

"jb" wrote in message news:HnQUf.122$Fl.48@fed1read09...
:
: more is known.
:
: Confirmation by Non-Christian Historians. One popular misconceptions
about
: Jesus is that there is no mention of him in any ancient sources outside
of
: the Bible. On the contrary, there are numerous references to him as an
: historical figure who died at the hand of Pontius Pilate. Some even
noted
: that he was reported to have risen from the dead, and was worshiped as a
god
: by all who followed him. Gary Habermas discusses these exhaustively.
: Quotations from historians and other sources are found in the article
New
: Testament, Non-Christian Sources .
:
: Evidence Relating to Jesus' Death. Three fascinating discoveries
illuminate
: the death of Christ and, to some degree, his resurrection. The first is
an
: unusual decree; the second is the body of another crucifixion victim.
:
: The Nazareth Decree. A slab of stone was found in Nazareth in 1878,
: inscribed with a decree from Emperor Claudius ( a.d . 41-54) that no
graves
: should be disturbed or bodies extracted or moved. This type of decree is
not
: uncommon, but the startling fact is that here "the offender [shall] be
: sentenced to capital punishment on [the] charge of violation of [a]
: sepulchre" (ibid., 155). Other notices warned of a fine, but death for
: disturbing graves? A likely explanation is that Claudius, having heard
of
: the Christian doctrine of resurrection and Jesus' empty tomb while
: investigating the riots of a.d . 49, decided not to let any such report
: surface again. This would make sense in light of the Jewish argument
that
: the body had been stolen ( Matt. 28:11-15 ). This is early testimony to
the
: strong and persistent belief that Jesus rose from the dead.
:
: Yohanan-A Crucifixion Victim. In 1968, an ancient burial site was
uncovered
: in Jerusalem containing about thirty-five bodies. It was determined that
: most of these had suffered violent deaths in the Jewish uprising against
: Rome in a.d . 70. One of these was a man named Yohanan Ben Ha'galgol. He
was
: about twenty-four to twenty-eight years old, had a cleft palate, and a
: seven-inch nail was still driven through both his feet. The feet had
been
: turned outward so that the square nail could be hammered through at the
: heel, just inside the Achilles tendon. This would have bowed the legs
: outward as well so that they could not have been used for support on the
: cross. The nail had gone through a wedge of acacia wood, then through
the
: heels, then into an olive wood beam. There was also evidence that
similar
: spikes had been put between the two bones of each lower arm. These had
: caused the upper bones to be worn smooth as the victim repeatedly raised
and
: lowered himself to breathe (breathing is restricted with the arms
raised).
: Crucifixion victims had to lift themselves to free the chest muscles
and,
: when they grew too weak to do so, died by suffocation.
:
: Yohanan's legs were crushed by a blow, consistent with the common use of
the
: Roman crucifragium ( John 19:31-32 ). Each of these details confirms the
New
: Testament description of crucifixion.
:
: Much more textual and archaeological evidence supports the accuracy of
the
: New Testament ( see Christ, Death of ). But even these examples reveal
the
: extent to which archaeology has confirmed the truth of the Scriptures.
: Archaeologist Nelson Glueck has boldly asserted that "it may be stated
: categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a
: biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made
which
: confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the
Bible"
: (Glueck, 31).
:
: Sources
:
: W. F. Albright, "Retrospect and Prospect in New Testament Archaeology,"
in
: E. J. Vardaman, ed., The Teacher's Yoke
:
: F. F. Bruce, The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?
:
: N. Glueck, Rivers in the Desert
:
: G. R. Habermas, The Verdict of History
:
: C. J. Hemer, The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History , C.
H.
: Gempf, ed.
:
: J. McRay, Archaeology and the New Testament
:
: W. M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman Citizen
:
: J. A. T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament
:
: A. N. Sherwin-White, Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament
:
: C. A. Wilson, Rocks, Relics and Biblical Reliability
:
: E. Yamauchi, The Stones and the Scriptur
:
: Geisler, N. L. (1999). Baker encyclopedia of Christian apologetics.
Baker
: reference library (Page 48). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.

Do you think that there may be the possibility of circular reasoning
involved in the conclusions of your biblical scholars?

I think there is the possibility of many things, but to really do justice to
the subject you have to view the evidence and look at what the various
sources archeology, historical have found. It is important to know also why
some declare things unknowable in history and therefore any historical
figure becomes unknowable to them. The point of what I gave is there is
evidence of Jesus's existence from a number of different sources and you can
examine it from various angles. I don't see the circular reasoning, but I
have seen that you will make statements and offer little to no proof and
call it absolute fact. Like the absurd notion that Hebrew scriptures
validate Judaism not Christianity. Yet the reality of it is they were all
written for the most part by Hebrew authors who believed the Hebrew
scriptures so what you said is nonsense. It validates both. Christianity
is dependant on the Hebrew revelations and works within them.>

--
Machque

"I think I'll believe in Gosh instead of God. If you don't believe in Gosh
too, you'll be darned to heck." -- anonymous
"He is YOUR God. They are YOUR Rules. YOU burn in Hell!" -- lapel button
"I don't mind born again Christians as long as they realize they don't get
twice as many rights." -- lapel button

"A faith that cannot survive collision with the truth is not worth many
regrets." -Arthur C. Clarke


.
User: "Mary Hogan"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 07:45:56 AM
Here is where you mess up, jb

I think there is the possibility of many things, but to really do justice
to the subject you have to view the evidence and look at what the various
sources archeology, historical have found.

Like history books can't be twisted? I would study the events surrounding
the Messiah very carefully. Yeshu does not wash.

It is important to know also why some declare things unknowable in
history and therefore any historical figure becomes unknowable to them.
The point of what I gave is there is evidence of Jesus's existence from a
number of different sources and you can examine it from various angles. I
don't see the circular reasoning, but I have seen that you will make
statements and offer little to no proof and call it absolute fact. Like
the absurd notion that Hebrew scriptures validate Judaism not
Christianity. Yet the reality of it is they were all written for the most
part by Hebrew authors who believed the Hebrew scriptures so what you said
is nonsense. It validates both. Christianity is dependant on the Hebrew
revelations and works within them.>

--
Machque

"I think I'll believe in Gosh instead of God. If you don't believe in
Gosh
too, you'll be darned to heck." -- anonymous
"He is YOUR God. They are YOUR Rules. YOU burn in Hell!" -- lapel button
"I don't mind born again Christians as long as they realize they don't
get
twice as many rights." -- lapel button

"A faith that cannot survive collision with the truth is not worth many
regrets." -Arthur C. Clarke





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 09:02:45 AM
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143207781_2893@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Here is where you mess up, jb


I think there is the possibility of many things, but to really do justice
to the subject you have to view the evidence and look at what the various
sources archeology, historical have found.


Like history books can't be twisted? I would study the events surrounding
the Messiah very carefully. Yeshu does not wash.

Please remove alt.atheism from your ***** threads, thank you.
Here, I've done it for you. No need to thank me.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.

User: "jb"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 08:06:06 AM
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143207781_2893@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Here is where you mess up, jb


I think there is the possibility of many things, but to really do justice
to the subject you have to view the evidence and look at what the various
sources archeology, historical have found.


Like history books can't be twisted? I would study the events surrounding
the Messiah very carefully. Yeshu does not wash.

Yet the issue here is the historical and archeological evidence of his
existence and not the truth he taught.


Snip

.
User: "Mary Hogan"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 08:16:54 AM
"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:R_SUf.132$Fl.107@fed1read09...


"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143207781_2893@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Here is where you mess up, jb


I think there is the possibility of many things, but to really do
justice to the subject you have to view the evidence and look at what
the various sources archeology, historical have found.


Like history books can't be twisted? I would study the events
surrounding the Messiah very carefully. Yeshu does not wash.


Yet the issue here is the historical and archeological evidence of his
existence and not the truth he taught.

You are trying to prove his existence...you are wasting precious time.
First determine if the messiah you follow fits the criteria of the Messiah
that God laid out before us. Going to man for any proof is silly and
dangerous.


Snip



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 12:03:41 PM
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143209638_2923@sp6iad.superfeed.net...


"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:R_SUf.132$Fl.107@fed1read09...


"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143207781_2893@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Here is where you mess up, jb


I think there is the possibility of many things, but to really do
justice to the subject you have to view the evidence and look at what
the various sources archeology, historical have found.


Like history books can't be twisted? I would study the events
surrounding the Messiah very carefully. Yeshu does not wash.


Yet the issue here is the historical and archeological evidence of his
existence and not the truth he taught.


You are trying to prove his existence...you are wasting precious time.

First determine if the messiah you follow fits the criteria of the Messiah
that God laid out before us. Going to man for any proof is silly and
dangerous.

Mary, stop the fucking crossposting!
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist ***** Extraordinaire
#1557
.

User: "Libertarius"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! - NOTHING! 24 Mar 2006 04:01:30 PM
Mary Hogan wrote:

"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:R_SUf.132$Fl.107@fed1read09...


"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143207781_2893@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Here is where you mess up, jb


I think there is the possibility of many things, but to really do
justice to the subject you have to view the evidence and look at what
the various sources archeology, historical have found.


Like history books can't be twisted? I would study the events
surrounding the Messiah very carefully. Yeshu does not wash.


Yet the issue here is the historical and archeological evidence of his
existence and not the truth he taught.


You are trying to prove his existence...you are wasting precious time.

First determine if the messiah you follow fits the criteria of the Messiah
that God laid out before us.

===>That is impossible, Mary, since no "God" has ever "laid out"
ANY "criteria".
It is all HUMAN INVENTION!

Going to man for any proof is silly and
dangerous.

===>WOW! You say that, while you are deeply engaged in the exact
practices you yourself term "silly and dangerous".
Are you not "going to man for any proof"???
(You call them "sages" or "masters", but they are just other MEN!)
And to prove how really dangerous it is, your mind is already
so clouded, you don't even realize you are doing exactly what
you warn others against! -- L.
.

User: "DanielSan"

Title: Re: What Jesus said that addresses the Hebrew Scriptures! 24 Mar 2006 08:19:27 AM
Mary Hogan wrote:

"jb" <jbenbo(4)@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:R_SUf.132$Fl.107@fed1read09...

"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote in message
news:1143207781_2893@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

Here is where you mess up, jb



I think there is the possibility of many things, but to really do
justice to the subject you have to view the evidence and look at what
the various sources archeology, historical have found.


Like history books can't be twisted? I would study the events
surrounding the Messiah very carefully. Yeshu does not wash.


Yet the issue here is the historical and archeological evidence of his
existence and not the truth he taught.



You are trying to prove his existence...

Not really. For us, if you wish for us to believe something outlandish,
you m