Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution



 Religions > Bible > Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 4

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "• Ninure Saunders"
Date: 12 Jul 2005 10:24:02 AM
Object: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution
Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage
Resolution
From The Associated Press, 7/9/05:
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBQURDAYAE.html
Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex
Marriage Resolution
The Associated Press
MIDDLEBROOK, Va. (AP) -
A small fire and anti-gay graffiti were found Saturday at a church
belonging to the United Church of Christ, a denomination that endorsed
same-sex marriage last week.
The exterior of St. John's Reformed United Church of Christ also
included a message that United Church of Christ members were sinners.
A member of the congregation discovered the graffiti when he stopped by to
mow the grass.
He found a small fire within the sanctuary.
The fire was put out in a few minutes, Lt. Tim McCray said.
A Virginia State Police fire investigator was on the scene Saturday
afternoon, but declined to comment.
The fire came a day after two black churches were heavily damaged by seven
arson fires in Sparta, Tenn.
Authorities said there was no evidence that it was a hate crime, but they
were not ruling anything out.
Someone also tried to set fire to a mosque early Saturday in
Bloomington, Ind., and the FBI was investigating it as a hate crime.
The United Church of Christ's rule-making body endorsed a resolution July
4 endorsing same-sex marriage.
UCC churches are autonomous, meaning the General Synod does not create
policy for its more than 5,700 congregations.
=================================================================
FAIR USE NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am
making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of
any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
=================================================================
Pax Christi,
• Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.

User: "J.W."

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 12 Jul 2005 12:27:08 PM
(• Ninure Saunders) wrote in
news:RainbowChristiannohate-1207051041060001@h-68-164-12-171.chcgilgm.dyn
amic.covad.net:
<Snip>

MIDDLEBROOK, Va. (AP) -

A small fire and anti-gay graffiti were found Saturday at a church
belonging to the United Church of Christ, a denomination that endorsed
same-sex marriage last week.

The exterior of St. John's Reformed United Church of Christ also
included a message that United Church of Christ members were sinners.

A member of the congregation discovered the graffiti when he stopped
by to mow the grass.

He found a small fire within the sanctuary.

The fire was put out in a few minutes, Lt. Tim McCray said.

A Virginia State Police fire investigator was on the scene Saturday
afternoon, but declined to comment.

It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to violence to
try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that he or she was a
sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John 3:10.)

The fire came a day after two black churches were heavily damaged by
seven arson fires in Sparta, Tenn.

Authorities said there was no evidence that it was a hate crime, but
they were not ruling anything out.

Someone also tried to set fire to a mosque early Saturday in
Bloomington, Ind., and the FBI was investigating it as a hate crime.

Why does this article mention any of this other stuff unless there is some
known connection between the events? If they are related, what is the
relationship?

The United Church of Christ's rule-making body endorsed a resolution
July 4 endorsing same-sex marriage.

UCC churches are autonomous, meaning the General Synod does not create
policy for its more than 5,700 congregations.

This is unfortunate for two reasons. First, and foremost, the Church has
proven itself to be apostate by endorsing that which is unbiblical.
Second, this resolution could possibly lead to splits within the
organization itself. A number of more conservative congregations have
already expressed their dissatisfaction with the resolution. The same
problem is going on inside the Episcopal Church.
John Wadsworth
john4250@earthlink.net
.
User: "• Ninure Saunders"

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 12 Jul 2005 06:22:00 PM
In article <Xns96916A5576FF7hohn@207.217.125.201>, "J.W." <J.W.@hw61.com> wrote:
-RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk (• Ninure Saunders) wrote in
-news:RainbowChristiannohate-1207051041060001@h-68-164-12-171.chcgilgm.dyn
-amic.covad.net:
-
-<Snip>
-
-> MIDDLEBROOK, Va. (AP) -
->
-> A small fire and anti-gay graffiti were found Saturday at a church
-> belonging to the United Church of Christ, a denomination that endorsed
-> same-sex marriage last week.
->
-> The exterior of St. John's Reformed United Church of Christ also
-> included a message that United Church of Christ members were sinners.
->
-> A member of the congregation discovered the graffiti when he stopped
-> by to mow the grass.
->
-> He found a small fire within the sanctuary.
->
-> The fire was put out in a few minutes, Lt. Tim McCray said.
->
-> A Virginia State Police fire investigator was on the scene Saturday
-> afternoon, but declined to comment.
-
-It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to violence to
-try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that he or she was a
-sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John 3:10.)
-
-> The fire came a day after two black churches were heavily damaged by
-> seven arson fires in Sparta, Tenn.
->
-> Authorities said there was no evidence that it was a hate crime, but
-> they were not ruling anything out.
->
-> Someone also tried to set fire to a mosque early Saturday in
-> Bloomington, Ind., and the FBI was investigating it as a hate crime.
-
-Why does this article mention any of this other stuff unless there is some
-known connection between the events? If they are related, what is the
-relationship?
-
-> The United Church of Christ's rule-making body endorsed a resolution
-> July 4 endorsing same-sex marriage.
->
-> UCC churches are autonomous, meaning the General Synod does not create
-> policy for its more than 5,700 congregations.
-
-This is unfortunate for two reasons. First, and foremost, the Church has
-proven itself to be apostate by endorsing that which is unbiblical.
-Second, this resolution could possibly lead to splits within the
-organization itself. A number of more conservative congregations have
-already expressed their dissatisfaction with the resolution. The same
-problem is going on inside the Episcopal Church.
-
It speaks vollumes that you could NOT bring yourself to speak a word of
condermnation for the crime committed against the UCC church.
I guess it is okay to commit acts of artson, perhaps even murder, as long
as it is done in the name of God?
Pax Christi,
• Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.
User: "J.W."

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 12 Jul 2005 07:37:01 PM
(• Ninure Saunders) wrote in
news:RainbowChristiannohate-1207051839040001@h-68-164-231-156.chcgilgm.dy
namic.covad.net:
<Snip>

-> MIDDLEBROOK, Va. (AP) -
->
-> A small fire and anti-gay graffiti were found Saturday at a church
-> belonging to the United Church of Christ, a denomination that
endorsed -> same-sex marriage last week.
->
-> The exterior of St. John's Reformed United Church of Christ also
-> included a message that United Church of Christ members were
sinners. ->
-> A member of the congregation discovered the graffiti when he
stopped -> by to mow the grass.
->
-> He found a small fire within the sanctuary.
->
-> The fire was put out in a few minutes, Lt. Tim McCray said.
->
-> A Virginia State Police fire investigator was on the scene Saturday
-> afternoon, but declined to comment.
-
-It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
violence to -try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that
he or she was a -sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John
3:10.) -
-> The fire came a day after two black churches were heavily damaged
by -> seven arson fires in Sparta, Tenn.
->
-> Authorities said there was no evidence that it was a hate crime,
but -> they were not ruling anything out.
->
-> Someone also tried to set fire to a mosque early Saturday in
-> Bloomington, Ind., and the FBI was investigating it as a hate
crime. -
-Why does this article mention any of this other stuff unless there is
some -known connection between the events? If they are related, what
is the -relationship?
-
-> The United Church of Christ's rule-making body endorsed a
resolution -> July 4 endorsing same-sex marriage.
->
-> UCC churches are autonomous, meaning the General Synod does not
create -> policy for its more than 5,700 congregations.
-
-This is unfortunate for two reasons. First, and foremost, the Church
has -proven itself to be apostate by endorsing that which is
unbiblical. -Second, this resolution could possibly lead to splits
within the -organization itself. A number of more conservative
congregations have -already expressed their dissatisfaction with the
resolution. The same -problem is going on inside the Episcopal
Church. -


It speaks vollumes that you could NOT bring yourself to speak a word
of condermnation for the crime committed against the UCC church.

Ninure. I'm sorry to know you can't read very well.
I said, and I quote from above (so you can compare):
"It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
violence to try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that
he or she was a sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John
3:10.)"
You see? I called the conduct "wrong" and the person a "sinner." That's
not condemntation? It is where I come from. How much stronger did you
want me to condemn it?
What I said was more than a WORD of condemnation.

I guess it is okay to commit acts of artson, perhaps even murder, as
long as it is done in the name of God?

I didn't say that, did I? As a matter of fact, it is only because you
can't read that you falsely accuse me of such a monstrous attitude.
"Do not judge so that you will not be judged." (Matthew 7:1.)
John Wadsworth
john4250@earthlink.net
.
User: "• Ninure Saunders"

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 13 Jul 2005 08:03:22 AM
In article <Xns9691B33763A1Ahohn@207.217.125.201>, "J.W." <J.W.@hw61.com> wrote:
-RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk (• Ninure Saunders) wrote in
-news:RainbowChristiannohate-1207051839040001@h-68-164-231-156.chcgilgm.dy
-namic.covad.net:
-
-<Snip>
-
-> -> MIDDLEBROOK, Va. (AP) -
-> ->
-> -> A small fire and anti-gay graffiti were found Saturday at a church
-> -> belonging to the United Church of Christ, a denomination that
-> endorsed -> same-sex marriage last week.
-> ->
-> -> The exterior of St. John's Reformed United Church of Christ also
-> -> included a message that United Church of Christ members were
-> sinners. ->
-> -> A member of the congregation discovered the graffiti when he
-> stopped -> by to mow the grass.
-> ->
-> -> He found a small fire within the sanctuary.
-> ->
-> -> The fire was put out in a few minutes, Lt. Tim McCray said.
-> ->
-> -> A Virginia State Police fire investigator was on the scene Saturday
-> -> afternoon, but declined to comment.
-> -
-> -It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
-> violence to -try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that
-> he or she was a -sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John
-> 3:10.) -
-> -> The fire came a day after two black churches were heavily damaged
-> by -> seven arson fires in Sparta, Tenn.
-> ->
-> -> Authorities said there was no evidence that it was a hate crime,
-> but -> they were not ruling anything out.
-> ->
-> -> Someone also tried to set fire to a mosque early Saturday in
-> -> Bloomington, Ind., and the FBI was investigating it as a hate
-> crime. -
-> -Why does this article mention any of this other stuff unless there is
-> some -known connection between the events? If they are related, what
-> is the -relationship?
-> -
-> -> The United Church of Christ's rule-making body endorsed a
-> resolution -> July 4 endorsing same-sex marriage.
-> ->
-> -> UCC churches are autonomous, meaning the General Synod does not
-> create -> policy for its more than 5,700 congregations.
-> -
-> -This is unfortunate for two reasons. First, and foremost, the Church
-> has -proven itself to be apostate by endorsing that which is
-> unbiblical. -Second, this resolution could possibly lead to splits
-> within the -organization itself. A number of more conservative
-> congregations have -already expressed their dissatisfaction with the
-> resolution. The same -problem is going on inside the Episcopal
-> Church. -
->
->
-> It speaks vollumes that you could NOT bring yourself to speak a word
-> of condermnation for the crime committed against the UCC church.
-
-Ninure. I'm sorry to know you can't read very well.
-
-I said, and I quote from above (so you can compare):
-
-"It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
-violence to try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that
-he or she was a sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John
-3:10.)"
-
-You see? I called the conduct "wrong" and the person a "sinner." That's
-not condemntation? It is where I come from. How much stronger did you
-want me to condemn it?
By not following up your so called "condemation" woth youir condemnation
of rhe UCC andf the Anfglican church.....because in doing so you negated
the so-called condemnation if the criminal act.
You in gact JUSTTIGFIED IT.
-
-What I said was more than a WORD of condemnation.
Baloney.
-
-> I guess it is okay to commit acts of artson, perhaps even murder, as
-> long as it is done in the name of God?
-
-I didn't say that, did I? As a matter of fact, it is only because you
-can't read that you falsely accuse me of such a monstrous attitude.
I can read, that why I took your response in total.
-
-"Do not judge so that you will not be judged." (Matthew 7:1.)
So you are not judhing when you call the UCC apostate?
-
-
-
-
-John Wadsworth
-john4250@earthlink.net
Pax Christi,
• Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.

User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 12 Jul 2005 09:45:39 PM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:37:01 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:

RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk (• Ninure Saunders) wrote in
news:RainbowChristiannohate-1207051839040001@h-68-164-231-156.chcgilgm.dy
namic.covad.net:

<Snip>

-> MIDDLEBROOK, Va. (AP) -
->
-> A small fire and anti-gay graffiti were found Saturday at a church
-> belonging to the United Church of Christ, a denomination that
endorsed -> same-sex marriage last week.
->
-> The exterior of St. John's Reformed United Church of Christ also
-> included a message that United Church of Christ members were
sinners. ->
-> A member of the congregation discovered the graffiti when he
stopped -> by to mow the grass.
->
-> He found a small fire within the sanctuary.
->
-> The fire was put out in a few minutes, Lt. Tim McCray said.
->
-> A Virginia State Police fire investigator was on the scene Saturday
-> afternoon, but declined to comment.
-
-It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
violence to -try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that
he or she was a -sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John
3:10.) -
-> The fire came a day after two black churches were heavily damaged
by -> seven arson fires in Sparta, Tenn.
->
-> Authorities said there was no evidence that it was a hate crime,
but -> they were not ruling anything out.
->
-> Someone also tried to set fire to a mosque early Saturday in
-> Bloomington, Ind., and the FBI was investigating it as a hate
crime. -
-Why does this article mention any of this other stuff unless there is
some -known connection between the events? If they are related, what
is the -relationship?
-
-> The United Church of Christ's rule-making body endorsed a
resolution -> July 4 endorsing same-sex marriage.
->
-> UCC churches are autonomous, meaning the General Synod does not
create -> policy for its more than 5,700 congregations.
-
-This is unfortunate for two reasons. First, and foremost, the Church
has -proven itself to be apostate by endorsing that which is
unbiblical. -Second, this resolution could possibly lead to splits
within the -organization itself. A number of more conservative
congregations have -already expressed their dissatisfaction with the
resolution. The same -problem is going on inside the Episcopal
Church. -


It speaks vollumes that you could NOT bring yourself to speak a word
of condermnation for the crime committed against the UCC church.


Ninure. I'm sorry to know you can't read very well.

I said, and I quote from above (so you can compare):

"It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
violence to try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that
he or she was a sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John
3:10.)"

You see? I called the conduct "wrong" and the person a "sinner." That's
not condemntation? It is where I come from. How much stronger did you
want me to condemn it?

What I said was more than a WORD of condemnation.

I guess it is okay to commit acts of artson, perhaps even murder, as
long as it is done in the name of God?


I didn't say that, did I? As a matter of fact, it is only because you
can't read that you falsely accuse me of such a monstrous attitude.

"Do not judge so that you will not be judged." (Matthew 7:1.)

Ninure is dumb enough to think that if people who call
themselves Christians do things like this, that means
that God approves of homosexual acts.
--
Pastor Dave
Silence in the Face of Doctrinal Criticism is Suicide
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
http://tinyurl.com/ce97m
.
User: "J.W."

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 12 Jul 2005 09:53:26 PM
Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:h009d1p59vkpr6m0o8gk2h2miuo5uk9lfv@4ax.com:
<Snip>

Ninure. I'm sorry to know you can't read very well.

I said, and I quote from above (so you can compare):

"It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
violence to try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that
he or she was a sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John
3:10.)"

You see? I called the conduct "wrong" and the person a "sinner."
That's not condemntation? It is where I come from. How much stronger
did you want me to condemn it?

What I said was more than a WORD of condemnation.

I guess it is okay to commit acts of artson, perhaps even murder, as
long as it is done in the name of God?


I didn't say that, did I? As a matter of fact, it is only because you
can't read that you falsely accuse me of such a monstrous attitude.

"Do not judge so that you will not be judged." (Matthew 7:1.)


Ninure is dumb enough to think that if people who call
themselves Christians do things like this, that means
that God approves of homosexual acts.

I don't know how this has anything to do with what I was talking about.
Nor do I think your disparagement of Ninure is either proper or terribly
helpful in the matter, especially considering what I just said.
Engagement is better than polarization.
John Wadsworth
john4250@earthlink.net
.
User: "• Ninure Saunders"

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 13 Jul 2005 08:10:53 AM
In article <Xns9691CA58F8071hohn@207.217.125.201>, "J.W." <J.W.@hw61.com> wrote:
-Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
-news:h009d1p59vkpr6m0o8gk2h2miuo5uk9lfv@4ax.com:
-
-<Snip>
-
->>Ninure. I'm sorry to know you can't read very well.
->>
->>I said, and I quote from above (so you can compare):
->>
->>"It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
->>violence to try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved that
->>he or she was a sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1 John
->>3:10.)"
->>
->>You see? I called the conduct "wrong" and the person a "sinner."
->>That's not condemntation? It is where I come from. How much stronger
->>did you want me to condemn it?
->>
->>What I said was more than a WORD of condemnation.
->>
->>> I guess it is okay to commit acts of artson, perhaps even murder, as
->>> long as it is done in the name of God?
->>
->>I didn't say that, did I? As a matter of fact, it is only because you
->>can't read that you falsely accuse me of such a monstrous attitude.
->>
->>"Do not judge so that you will not be judged." (Matthew 7:1.)
->
-> Ninure is dumb enough to think that if people who call
-> themselves Christians do things like this, that means
-> that God approves of homosexual acts.
-
-
-I don't know how this has anything to do with what I was talking about.
-Nor do I think your disparagement of Ninure is either proper or terribly
-helpful in the matter, especially considering what I just said.
-
-Engagement is better than polarization.
-
-Now I wish I could retract my last res[pnse to you.
I admit I was not truly responding to you as I should have, assiming that
you were of the exact same mind-set of people like 'pastor" Dave.
Pehaps you may have some small understanding of how that can occur.
But even if you cannot, I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me
in this case///
Pax Christi,
• Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.
User: "J.W."

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 13 Jul 2005 09:41:47 AM
(• Ninure Saunders) wrote in
news:RainbowChristiannohate-1307050827580001@h-68-164-15-158.chcgilgm.dyn
amic.covad.net:
<Snip>

->>I said, and I quote from above (so you can compare):
->>
->>"It is both unfortunate and wrong that anyone should resort to
->>violence to try and make a point. Whoever did this only proved
that ->>he or she was a sinner, and not of God. (Matthew 5:21-22; 1
John ->>3:10.)"
->>
->>You see? I called the conduct "wrong" and the person a "sinner."
->>That's not condemntation? It is where I come from. How much
stronger ->>did you want me to condemn it?
->>
->>What I said was more than a WORD of condemnation.
->>
->>> I guess it is okay to commit acts of artson, perhaps even murder,
as ->>> long as it is done in the name of God?
->>
->>I didn't say that, did I? As a matter of fact, it is only because
you ->>can't read that you falsely accuse me of such a monstrous
attitude. ->>
->>"Do not judge so that you will not be judged." (Matthew 7:1.)
->
-> Ninure is dumb enough to think that if people who call
-> themselves Christians do things like this, that means
-> that God approves of homosexual acts.
-
-
-I don't know how this has anything to do with what I was talking
about. -Nor do I think your disparagement of Ninure is either proper
or terribly -helpful in the matter, especially considering what I just
said. -
-Engagement is better than polarization.
-
-Now I wish I could retract my last res[pnse to you.

Consider it retracted. I will consider it non-existent.

I admit I was not truly responding to you as I should have, assiming
that you were of the exact same mind-set of people like 'pastor" Dave.

That's very considerate of you, and brave too.
But I'm not going to compare myself to "Pastor Dave." Comparisons with
others are irrelevant.
All I know is how I am led by the spirit to treat people - and you in
particular.

Pehaps you may have some small understanding of how that can occur.

I will not comment on Pastor Dave. I won't judge him (Matthew 7:1), and I
really don't know enough to comment on his behavior even if I was inclined
to do so (which I'm not). There is just no profit in it.
But, I do know from dealing with various people that some forget, or are
ignorant, or don't care, that Jesus Christ came to save and not condemn.
I'll go with what Jesus said.

But even if you cannot, I hope you can find it in your heart to
forgive me in this case///

I am a sinner, as everyone is a sinner. So I need forgiveness too.
Forgiveness comes from forgiving. (Matthew 6:14-15.)
So, consider yourself forgiven in this case. Glad to do it.
John Wadsworth
john4250@earthlink.net
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 13 Jul 2005 10:32:32 AM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:

I will not comment on Pastor Dave. I won't judge him (Matthew 7:1), and I
really don't know enough to comment on his behavior even if I was inclined
to do so (which I'm not). There is just no profit in it.

But, I do know from dealing with various people that some forget, or are
ignorant, or don't care, that Jesus Christ came to save and not condemn.
I'll go with what Jesus said.

Then let's look at what Jesus said and let's cover
all three possible scenarios...
John 3:17-19
17) For God sent not his Son into the world
to condemn the world; but that the world
through him might be saved.
18) He that believeth on him is not condemned:
but he that believeth not is condemned already,
because he hath not believed in the name of
the only begotten Son of God.
19) And this is the condemnation, that light is
come into the world, and men loved darkness
rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
Ninure does not believe on the Lord. That is
clear, since it involves more than just saying
that she does. Jesus said she is condemned.
But even if you think she does believe on
the Lord, then the following would apply
and consider that trespassing against us,
is also by spreading falsehoods in the church,
which is the body of believers...
Matthew 18:15-17
15) Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against
thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and
him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained
thy brother.
16) But if he will not hear thee, then take with
thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two
or three witnesses every word may be established.
17) And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto
the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let
him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican.
And even if you realize that she is not a sister
in Christ, she claims to be one and teaches
perversion as righteousness with God and
that makes her a heretic...
Titus 3:10-11
10) A man that is a heretic after the first
and second admonition reject;
11) Knowing that he that is such is subverted,
and sinneth, being condemned of himself.
No matter how you look at it, the Scripture
does not teach kindness to her. In fact,
you should read the following as well...
2 Corinthians 6:14-18
14) Be ye not unequally yoked together with
unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness
with unrighteousness? and what communion hath
light with darkness?
15) And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or
what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
16) And what agreement hath the temple of God
with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God;
as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in
them; and I will be their God, and they shall be
my people.
17) Wherefore come out from among them, and
be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the
unclean thing; and I will receive you.
18) And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be
my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
Note: Separate yourself from them and then
God will receive you. It's an "IF, THEN" statement.
You have been brainwashed by the modern,
feel good church. The same one that doesn't
preach repentance, but only, "Accept Jesus
and you're going to Heaven", without ever
mentioning their sin, or what they need to
do to repent and how they need to live.
I have a news flash... people don't accept Jesus.
He's not the one who needs to be accepted.
It is the people who need to be accepted by
Jesus and that doesn't happen by stroking
the sinners.
--
Pastor Dave
Silence in the Face of Doctrinal Criticism is Suicide
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
http://tinyurl.com/ce97m
.
User: "J.W."

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 13 Jul 2005 12:57:31 PM
Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:


I will not comment on Pastor Dave. I won't judge him (Matthew 7:1),
and I really don't know enough to comment on his behavior even if I
was inclined to do so (which I'm not). There is just no profit in it.

But, I do know from dealing with various people that some forget, or
are ignorant, or don't care, that Jesus Christ came to save and not
condemn. I'll go with what Jesus said.


Then let's look at what Jesus said and let's cover
all three possible scenarios...

No, let's not. I said that we will have this discussion one on one via e-
mail or not at all. Or didn't your read that post?
My true e-mail address is in my sig line. Send me a message, giving me an
e-mail address by which we may discuss the matter, or the whole discussion
with you is over. I'm not going to do this in an open, public forum.
Period.
John Wadsworth
john4250@earthlink.net
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 13 Jul 2005 01:24:13 PM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:

Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:


I will not comment on Pastor Dave. I won't judge him (Matthew 7:1),
and I really don't know enough to comment on his behavior even if I
was inclined to do so (which I'm not). There is just no profit in it.

But, I do know from dealing with various people that some forget, or
are ignorant, or don't care, that Jesus Christ came to save and not
condemn. I'll go with what Jesus said.


Then let's look at what Jesus said and let's cover
all three possible scenarios...


No, let's not. I said that we will have this discussion one on one via e-
mail or not at all. Or didn't your read that post?

I read it fine. And I chose to post here. As you
said, "I also post for the benefit of others".
I guess it is only okay for YOU to do that, right?
I guess it is only okay to post messages publicly,
if they leave out half the Gospel, right?
You go ahead and ignore the Scriptures and
claim that I am trying to get you to believe as
I do.
The reality is, I have never asked you to believe
what I tell you. I have only asked you to acknowledge
the Scriptures and to do what they say and to stop
telling me how someone isn't acting Christian, if they
come down on someone like Ninure.
According to you, Jesus was not following God's
way of dealing with people.
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts
of your father ye will do." - John 8:44a

I would never say that about Jesus.

You do, when you write to me about my behavior,
when I have done the same thing He did, to those
who claimed to be of God and were perverting
the Scriptures.

But he saw his audience face to face.

So if you can't see them face to face, then just
pretend that they're okay. Gotcha.

He knew the sum total of people to whom
he addressed his message.

Copout. I do not need to be Jesus, to know
what someone has witnessed about themselves.
Paul was not Jesus. Yet what did he say?
To toss the fornicator out of the church.

I will not comment on Pastor Dave. I won't judge him (Matthew 7:1), and I
really don't know enough to comment on his behavior even if I was inclined
to do so (which I'm not). There is just no profit in it.

But, I do know from dealing with various people that some forget, or are
ignorant, or don't care, that Jesus Christ came to save and not condemn.
I'll go with what Jesus said.

Then let's look at what Jesus said and let's cover
all three possible scenarios...
John 3:17-19
17) For God sent not his Son into the world
to condemn the world; but that the world
through him might be saved.
18) He that believeth on him is not condemned:
but he that believeth not is condemned already,
because he hath not believed in the name of
the only begotten Son of God.
19) And this is the condemnation, that light is
come into the world, and men loved darkness
rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
Ninure does not believe on the Lord. That is
clear, since it involves more than just saying
that she does. Jesus said she is condemned.
But even if you think she does believe on
the Lord, then the following would apply
and consider that trespassing against us,
is also by spreading falsehoods in the church,
which is the body of believers...
Matthew 18:15-17
15) Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against
thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and
him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained
thy brother.
16) But if he will not hear thee, then take with
thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two
or three witnesses every word may be established.
17) And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto
the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let
him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican.
And even if you realize that she is not a sister
in Christ, she claims to be one and teaches
perversion as righteousness with God and
that makes her a heretic...
Titus 3:10-11
10) A man that is a heretic after the first
and second admonition reject;
11) Knowing that he that is such is subverted,
and sinneth, being condemned of himself.
No matter how you look at it, the Scripture
does not teach kindness to her. In fact,
you should read the following as well...
2 Corinthians 6:14-18
14) Be ye not unequally yoked together with
unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness
with unrighteousness? and what communion hath
light with darkness?
15) And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or
what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
16) And what agreement hath the temple of God
with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God;
as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in
them; and I will be their God, and they shall be
my people.
17) Wherefore come out from among them, and
be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the
unclean thing; and I will receive you.
18) And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be
my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
Note: Separate yourself from them and then
God will receive you. It's an "IF, THEN" statement.
You have been brainwashed by the modern,
feel good church. The same one that doesn't
preach repentance, but only, "Accept Jesus
and you're going to Heaven", without ever
mentioning their sin, or what they need to
do to repent and how they need to live.
I have a news flash... people don't accept Jesus.
He's not the one who needs to be accepted.
It is the people who need to be accepted by
Jesus and that doesn't happen by stroking
the sinners.
--
Pastor Dave
Silence in the Face of Doctrinal Criticism is Suicide
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
http://tinyurl.com/ce97m
.
User: "J.W."

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 13 Jul 2005 04:06:34 PM
Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:1rmad19qcq5c47mn0l9ff6kh1r28v9qk4k@4ax.com:
<BIIIIG SNIP>
You don't listen do you? You are only concerned with your own ego.
END OF SUBJECT.
John Wadsworth
john4250@earthlink.net
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: Fire, Anti-Gay Graffiti at United Church of Christ After Same-Sex Marriage Resolution 13 Jul 2005 11:02:08 PM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 21:06:34 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:

Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:1rmad19qcq5c47mn0l9ff6kh1r28v9qk4k@4ax.com:

<BIIIIG SNIP>

You don't listen do you? You are only concerned with your own ego.

END OF SUBJECT.

Yes, that's why. Of course. That could be the only
reason.
It has nothing to do with the Scripture I quoted.
--
Pastor Dave
Silence in the Face of Doctrinal Criticism is Suicide
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
http://tinyurl.com/ce97m
.



User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: How to deal with Ninure 13 Jul 2005 01:26:55 PM
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:

Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:


I will not comment on Pastor Dave. I won't judge him (Matthew 7:1),
and I really don't know enough to comment on his behavior even if I
was inclined to do so (which I'm not). There is just no profit in it.

But, I do know from dealing with various people that some forget, or
are ignorant, or don't care, that Jesus Christ came to save and not
condemn. I'll go with what Jesus said.


Then let's look at what Jesus said and let's cover
all three possible scenarios...


No, let's not. I said that we will have this discussion one on one via e-
mail or not at all. Or didn't your read that post?

I read it fine. And I chose to post here. As you
said, "I also post for the benefit of others".
I guess it is only okay for YOU to do that, right?
I guess it is only okay to post messages publicly,
if they leave out half the Gospel, right?
You go ahead and ignore the Scriptures and
claim that I am trying to get you to believe as
I do.
The reality is, I have never asked you to believe
what I tell you. I have only asked you to acknowledge
the Scriptures and to do what they say and to stop
telling me how someone isn't acting Christian, if they
come down on someone like Ninure.
According to you, Jesus was not following God's
way of dealing with people.
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts
of your father ye will do." - John 8:44a

We are we told throughout scripture to answer
others about our faith with "meekness" and
"gentleness." (See 2 Timothy 2:25; Titus 3:2;
1 Peter 3:15.) This is why I gently suggested
that she couldn't read well, rather than spew
some hurtful epithet.

That is addressing people who ask about our faith.
Not heretics who claim to be of our faith and who
try to pervert our faith. You are trying to apply
a Scripture to everyone, that does not apply
to everyone.
According to you, Jesus was not following God's
way of dealing with people.
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts
of your father ye will do." - John 8:44a

Besides - and take careful note here - I'm not
just talking to Ninure.

You are talking to Ninure. Your message was
to her.

I'm talking to all those who may care to read
the thread. Even if it is true what you say
about Ninure (and I won't judge that right now),
you cannot categorically say the same about
everyone else who reads the thread. All posts
inside a thread are opportunites to witness.

That's a copout and you're trying to weasel out
of the facts I presented. By your logic, when
someone claims to be a Christian and says that
rape is okay, you should be kind to them,
because after all, others are reading. By your
logic, Jesus did the wrong thing, since other
people heard what He was saying...
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts
of your father ye will do." - John 8:44a
(re: I guess Jesus wasn't acting as God commands)

I would never say that about Jesus.

You do, when you write to me about my behavior,
when I have done the same thing He did, to those
who claimed to be of God and were perverting
the Scriptures.

But he saw his audience face to face.

So if you can't see them face to face, then just
pretend that they're okay. Gotcha.

He knew the sum total of people to whom
he addressed his message.

Copout. I do not need to be Jesus, to know
what someone has witnessed about themselves.
Paul was not Jesus. Yet what did he say?
To toss the fornicator out of the church.

I will not comment on Pastor Dave. I won't judge him (Matthew 7:1), and I
really don't know enough to comment on his behavior even if I was inclined
to do so (which I'm not). There is just no profit in it.

But, I do know from dealing with various people that some forget, or are
ignorant, or don't care, that Jesus Christ came to save and not condemn.
I'll go with what Jesus said.

Then let's look at what Jesus said and let's cover
all three possible scenarios...
John 3:17-19
17) For God sent not his Son into the world
to condemn the world; but that the world
through him might be saved.
18) He that believeth on him is not condemned:
but he that believeth not is condemned already,
because he hath not believed in the name of
the only begotten Son of God.
19) And this is the condemnation, that light is
come into the world, and men loved darkness
rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
Ninure does not believe on the Lord. That is
clear, since it involves more than just saying
that she does. Jesus said she is condemned.
But even if you think she does believe on
the Lord, then the following would apply
and consider that trespassing against us,
is also by spreading falsehoods in the church,
which is the body of believers...
Matthew 18:15-17
15) Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against
thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and
him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained
thy brother.
16) But if he will not hear thee, then take with
thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two
or three witnesses every word may be established.
17) And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto
the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let
him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican.
And even if you realize that she is not a sister
in Christ, she claims to be one and teaches
perversion as righteousness with God and
that makes her a heretic...
Titus 3:10-11
10) A man that is a heretic after the first
and second admonition reject;
11) Knowing that he that is such is subverted,
and sinneth, being condemned of himself.
No matter how you look at it, the Scripture
does not teach kindness to her. In fact,
you should read the following as well...
2 Corinthians 6:14-18
14) Be ye not unequally yoked together with
unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness
with unrighteousness? and what communion hath
light with darkness?
15) And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or
what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
16) And what agreement hath the temple of God
with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God;
as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in
them; and I will be their God, and they shall be
my people.
17) Wherefore come out from among them, and
be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the
unclean thing; and I will receive you.
18) And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be
my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
Note: Separate yourself from them and then
God will receive you. It's an "IF, THEN" statement.
You have been brainwashed by the modern,
feel good church. The same one that doesn't
preach repentance, but only, "Accept Jesus
and you're going to Heaven", without ever
mentioning their sin, or what they need to
do to repent and how they need to live.
I have a news flash... people don't accept Jesus.
He's not the one who needs to be accepted.
It is the people who need to be accepted by
Jesus and that doesn't happen by stroking
the sinners.
--
Pastor Dave
Silence in the Face of Doctrinal Criticism is Suicide
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
http://tinyurl.com/ce97m
.
User: "Adrian Miles-Davros"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 14 Jul 2005 03:31:52 AM
"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:


Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:

Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for you to
understand:-
The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.
Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to change.
.
User: "Pastor Dave"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 14 Jul 2005 09:40:15 AM
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:31:52 +0100, "Adrian
Miles-Davros" <davros@maggtpunks.co.uk> spake thusly:


"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:


Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:


Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for you to
understand:-

The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.

Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to change.

She claims that God approves of homosexual acts.
--
Pastor Dave
Silence in the Face of Doctrinal Criticism is Suicide
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
http://tinyurl.com/ce97m
.
User: "Jude"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 14 Jul 2005 11:22:11 AM
"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:q6ucd1tncftbio23rio3am8ae47ktgpnn5@4ax.com...

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:31:52 +0100, "Adrian
Miles-Davros" <davros@maggtpunks.co.uk> spake thusly:


"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:


Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
<J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:


Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for you to
understand:-

The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.

Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to change.


She claims that God approves of homosexual acts.

Brillant deduction, Sherlock!
.
User: "• Ninure Saunders"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 14 Jul 2005 04:03:02 PM
In article <6hwBe.71131$Tt.15062@bignews3.bellsouth.net>, "Jude"
<Jude@thebayou.here> wrote:
-"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
-news:q6ucd1tncftbio23rio3am8ae47ktgpnn5@4ax.com...
-> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:31:52 +0100, "Adrian
-> Miles-Davros" <davros@maggtpunks.co.uk> spake thusly:
->
-> >
-> >"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
-> >news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...
-> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
-> >> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>
-> >>
-> >>>Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
-> >>>news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:
-> >>>
-> >>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
-> >>>> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>>>
-> >
-> >Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for you to
-> >understand:-
-> >
-> >The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.
-> >
-> >Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to change.
->
-> She claims that God approves of homosexual acts.
<piggynacking>
I don't claim that God approves of "homosexual acts" in any way different
than God approvesz of heterosecual acts.
In fact, uf one were to look to the New Terstament for a model of sexual
behavior one might conclude that God doesn't approve of sexual activity
at all...since Jesus didn't marry (so much for "be fruitful and multiply"_
and neither did Paul.
And Paul claimed the best state for Chrisyians was to remain
celibate.virgin.....that marriage was NOT for raising children but to keep
from "burning because of lust"!!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------
The bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals
and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean
that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they
need more supervision.
--Lynn Lavner.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pax Christi,
• Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
Jesus is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk
My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org
The Bible Site - help provide free scripture
http://www.thebiblesite.org
To send e-mail, remove nohate from address
.
User: "Jude"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 14 Jul 2005 04:18:07 PM
"• Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote in
message
news:RainbowChristiannohate-1407051620060001@h-68-164-8-224.chcgilgm.dynamic
..covad.net...

In article <6hwBe.71131$Tt.15062@bignews3.bellsouth.net>, "Jude"
<Jude@thebayou.here> wrote:

-"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
-news:q6ucd1tncftbio23rio3am8ae47ktgpnn5@4ax.com...
-> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:31:52 +0100, "Adrian
-> Miles-Davros" <davros@maggtpunks.co.uk> spake thusly:
->
-> >
-> >"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in

message

-> >news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...
-> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
-> >> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>
-> >>
-> >>>Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
-> >>>news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:
-> >>>
-> >>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
-> >>>> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>>>
-> >
-> >Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for you to
-> >understand:-
-> >
-> >The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.
-> >
-> >Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to change.
->
-> She claims that God approves of homosexual acts.

<piggynacking>

I don't claim that God approves of "homosexual acts" in any way different
than God approvesz of heterosecual acts.

In fact, uf one were to look to the New Terstament for a model of sexual
behavior one might conclude that God doesn't approve of sexual activity
at all...since Jesus didn't marry (so much for "be fruitful and multiply"_
and neither did Paul.

And Paul claimed the best state for Chrisyians was to remain
celibate.virgin.....that marriage was NOT for raising children but to keep
from "burning because of lust"!!!!

Good response... better than mine, actually ! lol
.
User: "Jani"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 14 Jul 2005 06:29:55 PM
"Jude" <Jude@thebayou.here> wrote in message
news:uCABe.68668$qm.36974@bignews5.bellsouth.net...


". Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote in
message
news:RainbowChristiannohate-1407051620060001@h-68-164-8-224.chcgilgm.dynamic
.covad.net...

In article <6hwBe.71131$Tt.15062@bignews3.bellsouth.net>, "Jude"
<Jude@thebayou.here> wrote:

-"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
-news:q6ucd1tncftbio23rio3am8ae47ktgpnn5@4ax.com...
-> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:31:52 +0100, "Adrian
-> Miles-Davros" <davros@maggtpunks.co.uk> spake thusly:
->
-> >
-> >"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in

message

-> >news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...
-> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
-> >> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>
-> >>
-> >>>Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
-> >>>news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:
-> >>>
-> >>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
-> >>>> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>>>
-> >
-> >Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for you
to
-> >understand:-
-> >
-> >The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.
-> >
-> >Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to change.
->
-> She claims that God approves of homosexual acts.

<piggynacking>

I don't claim that God approves of "homosexual acts" in any way
different
than God approvesz of heterosecual acts.

In fact, uf one were to look to the New Terstament for a model of sexual
behavior one might conclude that God doesn't approve of sexual activity
at all...since Jesus didn't marry (so much for "be fruitful and
multiply"_
and neither did Paul.

And Paul claimed the best state for Chrisyians was to remain
celibate.virgin.....that marriage was NOT for raising children but to
keep
from "burning because of lust"!!!!


Good response... better than mine, actually ! lol

Paul was an ascetic, and a proponent of celibacy for *all*, not just those
who are called to celibacy. Follow that through, and if he'd had a bigger
following, none of us would be here now discussing it :)
Jani
.
User: "Jude"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 14 Jul 2005 06:45:25 PM
"Jani" <jani@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:42d6f55c$0$12901$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...


"Jude" <Jude@thebayou.here> wrote in message
news:uCABe.68668$qm.36974@bignews5.bellsouth.net...


". Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote

in

message

news:RainbowChristiannohate-1407051620060001@h-68-164-8-224.chcgilgm.dynamic

.covad.net...

In article <6hwBe.71131$Tt.15062@bignews3.bellsouth.net>, "Jude"
<Jude@thebayou.here> wrote:

-"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in

message

-news:q6ucd1tncftbio23rio3am8ae47ktgpnn5@4ax.com...
-> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:31:52 +0100, "Adrian
-> Miles-Davros" <davros@maggtpunks.co.uk> spake thusly:
->
-> >
-> >"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in

message

-> >news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...
-> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
-> >> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>
-> >>
-> >>>Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
-> >>>news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:
-> >>>
-> >>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
-> >>>> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>>>
-> >
-> >Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for you
to
-> >understand:-
-> >
-> >The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.
-> >
-> >Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to

change.

->
-> She claims that God approves of homosexual acts.

<piggynacking>

I don't claim that God approves of "homosexual acts" in any way
different
than God approvesz of heterosecual acts.

In fact, uf one were to look to the New Terstament for a model of

sexual

behavior one might conclude that God doesn't approve of sexual

activity

at all...since Jesus didn't marry (so much for "be fruitful and
multiply"_
and neither did Paul.

And Paul claimed the best state for Chrisyians was to remain
celibate.virgin.....that marriage was NOT for raising children but to
keep
from "burning because of lust"!!!!


Good response... better than mine, actually ! lol


Paul was an ascetic, and a proponent of celibacy for *all*, not just those
who are called to celibacy. Follow that through, and if he'd had a bigger
following, none of us would be here now discussing it :)

Jani

He believed that Jesus was returning within his generation, that Jesus' 2nd
coming was "at hand." Thus, he told people to remain as they were and not
to change anything as well as don't seek to marry but if you couldn't
withhold, marry.
.
User: "Jani"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 14 Jul 2005 07:23:23 PM
"Jude" <Jude@thebayou.here> wrote in message
news:AMCBe.68711$qm.24353@bignews5.bellsouth.net...


"Jani" <jani@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:42d6f55c$0$12901$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...


"Jude" <Jude@thebayou.here> wrote in message
news:uCABe.68668$qm.36974@bignews5.bellsouth.net...


". Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk> wrote

in

message

news:RainbowChristiannohate-1407051620060001@h-68-164-8-224.chcgilgm.dynamic

.covad.net...

In article <6hwBe.71131$Tt.15062@bignews3.bellsouth.net>, "Jude"
<Jude@thebayou.here> wrote:

-"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in

message

-news:q6ucd1tncftbio23rio3am8ae47ktgpnn5@4ax.com...
-> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:31:52 +0100, "Adrian
-> Miles-Davros" <davros@maggtpunks.co.uk> spake thusly:
->
-> >
-> >"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in

message

-> >news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...
-> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
-> >> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>
-> >>
-> >>>Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
-> >>>news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:
-> >>>
-> >>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
-> >>>> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>>>
-> >
-> >Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for
you
to
-> >understand:-
-> >
-> >The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.
-> >
-> >Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to

change.

->
-> She claims that God approves of homosexual acts.

<piggynacking>

I don't claim that God approves of "homosexual acts" in any way
different
than God approvesz of heterosecual acts.

In fact, uf one were to look to the New Terstament for a model of

sexual

behavior one might conclude that God doesn't approve of sexual

activity

at all...since Jesus didn't marry (so much for "be fruitful and
multiply"_
and neither did Paul.

And Paul claimed the best state for Chrisyians was to remain
celibate.virgin.....that marriage was NOT for raising children but to
keep
from "burning because of lust"!!!!


Good response... better than mine, actually ! lol


Paul was an ascetic, and a proponent of celibacy for *all*, not just
those
who are called to celibacy. Follow that through, and if he'd had a bigger
following, none of us would be here now discussing it :)

Jani


He believed that Jesus was returning within his generation, that Jesus'
2nd
coming was "at hand." Thus, he told people to remain as they were and not
to change anything as well as don't seek to marry but if you couldn't
withhold, marry.

OK, that having been proved wrong, why are people still citing it? I mean,
it's either "keep your legs crossed, this is only temporary" or "this is a
permanent and long-term lifestyle change handed down from on high, cold
showers are a fast-track to heaven". Can't be both :)
Jani
.
User: "Jude"

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 15 Jul 2005 08:02:24 AM
"Jani" <jani@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:42d701dc$0$12883$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...


"Jude" <Jude@thebayou.here> wrote in message
news:AMCBe.68711$qm.24353@bignews5.bellsouth.net...


"Jani" <jani@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:42d6f55c$0$12901$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...


"Jude" <Jude@thebayou.here> wrote in message
news:uCABe.68668$qm.36974@bignews5.bellsouth.net...


". Ninure Saunders" <RainbowChristiannohate@Rainbow-Christian.tk>

wrote

in

message


news:RainbowChristiannohate-1407051620060001@h-68-164-8-224.chcgilgm.dynamic

.covad.net...

In article <6hwBe.71131$Tt.15062@bignews3.bellsouth.net>, "Jude"
<Jude@thebayou.here> wrote:

-"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in

message

-news:q6ucd1tncftbio23rio3am8ae47ktgpnn5@4ax.com...
-> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:31:52 +0100, "Adrian
-> Miles-Davros" <davros@maggtpunks.co.uk> spake thusly:
->
-> >
-> >"Pastor Dave" <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in

message

-> >news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com...
-> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:57:31 GMT, "J.W."
-> >> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>
-> >>
-> >>>Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
-> >>>news:c8cad1dhbmusns90v538ipgq8l58dvtiv6@4ax.com:
-> >>>
-> >>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:41:47 GMT, "J.W."
-> >>>> <J.W.@hw61.com> spake thusly:
-> >>>>
-> >
-> >Surely there is nothing to deal with, it's very simple even for
you
to
-> >understand:-
-> >
-> >The Lord is her Shepherd and he knows she is Gay.
-> >
-> >Statement of fact and nothing your proselytising is going to

change.

->
-> She claims that God approves of homosexual acts.

<piggynacking>

I don't claim that God approves of "homosexual acts" in any way
different
than God approvesz of heterosecual acts.

In fact, uf one were to look to the New Terstament for a model of

sexual

behavior one might conclude that God doesn't approve of sexual

activity

at all...since Jesus didn't marry (so much for "be fruitful and
multiply"_
and neither did Paul.

And Paul claimed the best state for Chrisyians was to remain
celibate.virgin.....that marriage was NOT for raising children but

to

keep
from "burning because of lust"!!!!


Good response... better than mine, actually ! lol


Paul was an ascetic, and a proponent of celibacy for *all*, not just
those
who are called to celibacy. Follow that through, and if he'd had a

bigger

following, none of us would be here now discussing it :)

Jani


He believed that Jesus was returning within his generation, that Jesus'
2nd
coming was "at hand." Thus, he told people to remain as they were and

not

to change anything as well as don't seek to marry but if you couldn't
withhold, marry.


OK, that having been proved wrong, why are people still citing it? I mean,
it's either "keep your legs crossed, this is only temporary" or "this is a
permanent and long-term lifestyle change handed down from on high, cold
showers are a fast-track to heaven". Can't be both :)

Jani

Because believers aren't in agreement about WHY Paul said what he said.
However, if one approaches Paul's sayings WITHOUT bias (just find what is
there and that be good enough) then one can't help but read that Paul
believed that Jesus was returning shortly and that it would ALL be over and
the end would come with tribulations that the world had never seen before!
It's amazing how people can twist words when they approach a body of written
work! You have to approach it willing to accept what it says, if you can't
understand what it says then just say you can't understand it and not try to
twist it into a meaning, etc. You know what I mean.
.









User: "J.W."

Title: Re: How to deal with Ninure 13 Jul 2005 11:15:24 PM
Pastor Dave <news-group-mail@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in
news:k2nad1putvdrkrn06hjcqf4d9ut6hm9ouu@4ax.com:

No, let's not. I said that we will have this discussion one on one
via e- mail or not at all. Or didn't your read that post?


I read it fine. And I chose to post here. As you
said, "I also post for the benefit of others".

I guess it is only okay for YOU to do that, right?

I ASKED you, even BEGGED you, to keep this out of the public forum. But
could you do that? No. I asked you to do that because, as I said, I
believed that airing all of this out would be damaging, didn't I?
Here's one of your favorite verses, Dave:
"Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye
all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but
that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same
judgment." (1 Corinthians 1:10.)
We have differences to work out. I didn't want to work them out in public
in deference to what Paul "beseeched" us because we would first show our
differences before we could work on the same page. You just can't take a
hint.
And do you know why? Because you are too interested in somehow proving
yourself "right." Your carnal, sometimes hateful, unspiritual and often
scripturally flawed arguments are, to you, worth more than souls. Isn't
that right? If you don't say so directly, you say it in your behavior.
Winning for yourself is now a loss for the Kingdom. How very loving and
Christian of you.

I guess it is only okay to post messages publicly,
if they leave out half the Gospel, right?

You go ahead and ignore the Scriptures and
claim that I am trying to get you to believe as
I do.

I am not ignoring scripture, and I'm not leaving out half of the Gospel. I
was merely asking you, as kindly as possible, to get the heck out of my way
and stop torpedoing my efforts. You really do not know what you are doing
sometimes. And now you hinder others who are burdened to witness.

The reality is, I have never asked you to believe
what I tell you. I have only asked you to acknowledge
the Scriptures and to do what they say and to stop
telling me how someone isn't acting Christian, if they
come down on someone like Ninure.

I was politely asking you to shut up. Your pontifications - which just
gotta come out, and all your hateful judgments don't do anything to spread
the Gospel. As a matter of fact, you do NOTHING to spread the Gospel in
the NGs and you certainly do nothing remotely akin to witnessing. See more
about that below.

According to you, Jesus was not following God's
way of dealing with people.

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts
of your father ye will do." - John 8:44a

You don't know if you've been snake bit or powder burned. Jesus was
describing to the apostate religious leaders of his day the true nature of
their spiritual state. Don't flatter yourself with the idea that this is
what you are doing. You condemn people - which is something Jesus said not
to do. See below.

We are we told throughout scripture to answer
others about our faith with "meekness" and
"gentleness." (See 2 Timothy 2:25; Titus 3:2;
1 Peter 3:15.) This is why I gently suggested
that she couldn't read well, rather than spew
some hurtful epithet.


That is addressing people who ask about our faith.
Not heretics who claim to be of our faith and who
try to pervert our faith. You are trying to apply
a Scripture to everyone, that does not apply
to everyone.

WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!
Titus 3:2 says we are "to malign NO ONE, to be peaceable, gentle, showing
every consideration for ALL MEN." (Emphasis added by caps.)
Did you see that? Malign NO ONE. That means no one, none, no person -
regardless of situation. Get it? It also says show EVERY consideration for
ALL MEN - not some men, not only for those we esteem, but all men without
discrimination - even if we don't happen to like them or what they do.
Again, Philippians 4:5 says, "Let your gentle spirit be known to ALL MEN.
The Lord is near." (Emphasis added.)
And again, 2 Timothy 2:24-25 instructs that: ". . . the servant of the Lord
must not strive; but be gentle unto ALL MEN, apt to teach, patient, in
meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will
give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth." (Emphasis added.)
Take notice that none of these passages admit of any exception as to how we
are to deal with ALL people under ALL circumstances. So, until you can
show me where the exceptions to these passages lie, I can only believe that
I must - indeed every Christian must - treat everyone with more and more
gentleness and consideration.
It is also why I must part company with you in your use of hateful and
hurtful epithets. But, if you choose to abuse others, I will not tell you
that you are being un-Christian. Nope. I'll let the Bible do it - like I
just did.
<redundan passage snipped>

Besides - and take careful note here - I'm not
just talking to Ninure.


You are talking to Ninure. Your message was
to her.


I'm talking to all those who may care to read
the thread. Even if it is true what you say
about Ninure (and I won't judge that right now),
you cannot categorically say the same about
everyone else who reads the thread. All posts
inside a thread are opportunites to witness.


That's a copout and you're trying to weasel out
of the facts I presented. By your logic, when
someone claims to be a Christian and says that
rape is okay, you should be kind to them,
because after all, others are reading. By your
logic, Jesus did the wrong thing, since other
people heard what He was saying...

Then you are copping out here, Dave - because you have expressly adopted
the same logic to air out in public the dispute that subsists between us.
As to my logic for being kind, that comes from scriptures that you choose
to ignore. See above.

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts
of your father ye will do." - John 8:44a


(re: I guess Jesus wasn't acting as God commands)

I would never say that about Jesus.


You do, when you write to me about my behavior,
when I have done the same thing He did, to those
who claimed to be of God and were perverting
the Scriptures.

How dare you ever compare yourself to Jesus? Jesus was sinless throughout
his precious life. You are not. You don't hold a candle to him; and you
certainly don't do what he commands you to do.

But he saw his audience face to face.


So if you can't see them face to face, then just
pretend that they're okay. Gotcha.


He knew the sum total of people to whom
he addressed his message.


Copout. I do not need to be Jesus, to know
what someone has witnessed about themselves.

I doubt that you have witnessed to Ninure. I doubt that you have in any
fashion conveyed to Gospel to Ninure. I believe you may have gotten into a
verbal exchange of some sort with her, and that would be typical for you.
Thus, I cannot trust your word that she has been properly witnessed to and
admonished so as to conclude you seek to apply the remedy applicable to
heretics as laid out below.
<Snip>

Then let's look at what Jesus said and let's cover
all three possible scenarios...

John 3:17-19

17) For God sent not his Son into the world
to condemn the world; but that the world
through him might be saved.
18) He that believeth on him is not condemned:
but he that believeth not is condemned already,
because he hath not believed in the name of
the only begotten Son of God.
19) And this is the condemnation, that light is
come into the world, and men loved darkness
rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

Ninure does not believe on the Lord. That is
clear, since it involves more than just saying
that she does. Jesus said she is condemned.

Which is why Ninure needs the Gospel spoken with patience - which is
something you never try to do in any of these news groups. (See below.)
That is why I cannot take your word that the gospel has been preached to
her and thereafter admonished - so as to treat her like a "heathen and a
publican" now that she persists in her ways. Your verbal sparring, given
all that it is worth, doesn't come close to conveying the Gospel.
The Gospel is "Christ and Him crucified" (1 Corinthians 2:2) - which speaks
of Jesus' saving sacrifice and resurrection - which makes eternal life
possible as a free gift to those who repent and turn to him. (Ephesians
2:1-8.) THAT'S what the Gospel is about - and not your inane disputes over
Bible trivia.

But even if you think she does believe on
the Lord, then the following would apply
and consider that trespassing against us,
is also by spreading falsehoods in the church,
which is the body of believers...

Matthew 18:15-17

15) Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against
thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and
him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained
thy brother.
16) But if he will not hear thee, then take with
thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two
or three witnesses every word may be established.
17) And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto
the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let
him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican.

And even if you realize that she is not a sister
in Christ, she claims to be one and teaches
perversion as righteousness with God and
that makes her a heretic...

Titus 3:10-11

10) A man that is a heretic after the first
and second admonition reject;
11) Knowing that he that is such is subverted,
and sinneth, being condemned of himself.

No matter how you look at it, the Scripture
does not teach kindness to her. In fact,
you should read the following as well...

As I have shown you above, Scriptures do teach kindness to everyone. You
only choose to ignore the scriptures that so teach. Even "rejecting" a
heretic is done by putting them out - and not by being mean, or rude, or
hateful toward them. You need to rebuke whomever you learned the contrary
- for whoever did so is a false teacher.
Moreover, my point about treating her as a heretic - rather than the
unsaved - still stands. That her views do not agree with the saving Gospel
of Jesus shows that she needs the real one - rather than your bitter, angry
rejection.

2 Corinthians 6:14-18

14) Be ye not unequally yoked together with
unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness
with unrighteousness? and what communion hath
light with darkness?
15) And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or
what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
16) And what agreement hath the temple of God
with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God;
as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in
them; and I will be their God, and they shall be
my people.
17) Wherefore come out from among them, and
be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the
unclean thing; and I will receive you.
18) And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be
my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.

Note: Separate yourself from them and then
God will receive you. It's an "IF, THEN" statement.

See above. You treat Ninure like she is part of the congregation. I don't
because she isn't. To me, she is just like an R.C. Don't you witness to
R.C.s? I do - and to Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons, and so on.
Oh, that's right. You don't witness, do you?. You just squabble and spit.
Your self-righteous need to be