Religions > Bible > Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation"
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Moses Gibson" |
| Date: |
03 Mar 2004 08:21:21 PM |
| Object: |
Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
El culo ... one's bum, etc. Not to be used for ...
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Lethal Question:
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
Mel Gibson is one dumb and grasping devil-may-care ambitious
hypocrite, with the IQ of a penis. His father was a right wing
psychotic who denounced the Vatican in 1964 in a break-away cult that
was banned by the Pope. Not many adherents follow this sect, it is
like the Moonies, although much much smaller and they do not have the
backing of our CIA like the Rev. Moon's Korean outfit, nor the Dalai
Lama [another CIA stooge who would be nothing without CIA backing].
Mel Gibson is one of the cultists, but never too evident especially if
it gets in the way of making big bucks -- making blockbuster and
ballbuster movies with his imprimatur swashbuckled onto it. BRAVEHEART
was this bad actor's first stab at directing, and man was that one
assbackwards and messed up film, with Mel in every frame as tall as
Hercules on the Scottish battlefields saving Scotland from all of Mel
Gibson's fantasy foes, which did not dovetail with historical record.
He is very short and must have a peewee's inferiority complex [short
and numb in the intellectual range of fine calibrated minds -- i.e.,
exhibitionistically dumb] and to compensate he is overweeningly
ambitious, rigorously stumping for himself. He patently hides behind
cliches, Christian fundamentalist cartoon stick figures, in order to
aggrandize himself. He is no artist, no director, no writer, no
thinker, no intellectual. He is Mad Max, period, an action actor like
Sylvester Stallone. I think Stallone directed a few movies too, that
are equally bad, maybe even better.
You have a lot of loftier things to do with your head than dwell on
media hype that is generated by Mel's cult looking for a billion bucks
-- along with Moneybags Mel, the saintly one.
I saw the trailers. To be pretentiously historic the characters speak
Aramaic and Latin depending on whether they were a jew or a roman
soldier. The Romans were murderous back then, and the jews just
fiddled along with the dictator's impulses just like Bulgaria or
Ecuador today when GW Bush rattles his sabers. The elite Jews then
were protecting their own asses in a world where every ***** was up for
execution. Not a very pretty reality, not very admirable for the elite
jews of the time, but nothing like Gibson's movie, anyway, every group
was copping out back then with an excuse to follow the Roman Emperor,
or else you were pulled apart on a wheel while dogs ate your
intestines. Something like the way GW Bush disregarded the UN leading
up to the pointless attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq.
Why Mel Brooks -- [I mean Mel Gibson] -- picked CHRIST'S PASSION and
made every minute of our honored protagonist's bible book death so
brutal and so violent as to deserve an R rating [with no sex in it --
unless all the rapping with vampiric Satan is pillow talk], is because
monkeying around Mel Gibson really had nothing to say, he never was a
thinker and he never had an idea of his own in his head his entire
breathing existence, so he latched onto Christ, an easy plot that
millions will applaud. Also, he picked the Bible theme because he is a
Mammonist who appreciates deeply both money and self-aggrandizement,
with rivers of blood and tableaus of torture for good measure.
He is a little punk who was the son of a lottery winner in the USA who
had 8 kids or so and moved to Australia with the $27,000 to start a
new life for his kids and family during the Vietnam Era when his sons
were up for the draft. It worked. Mel, like GW, dodged war and then
spent his whole friggin life glorifying war and his own deluded and
non-existent heroism. Sticky, adhesive, in your face -- nasty bat
guano. Nothing more and smells just as rat-like.
Anyone with 80 million dollars to burn and the support of
quasi-Masonic organizations [look at Gibson's films from whence he
started to co-produce -- just after he had pocketed around $100
million personally for LETHAL WEAPONs 1 thru 1000 -- and you will see
Masonic-emblem pyramids in backgrounds where they don't really belong
but look compelling and artsy, etc.]. Anyone with at least one million
bucks can hire out a genius cameraman and a top notch Euro art
director to make any film look atmospheric, even a soft porno movie
that is for different reasons rated R. Take your kids to see Delta of
Venus, and they will be spared a brutal crucifiction but may learn
that it is very difficult to be killed by kisses [even Judas
tongue-in-cheek, considered]. Then they might have a passion for life
rather than a passion for death, which seems to be the theme of our
new millenium.
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
.
|
|
| User: "Geoman" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
04 Mar 2004 06:21:22 PM |
|
|
"Moses Gibson" <moses_gibson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:113f8369.0403031821.8638cac@posting.google.com...
El culo ... one's bum, etc. Not to be used for ...
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Lethal Question:
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
Mel Gibson is one dumb and grasping devil-may-care ambitious
hypocrite, with the IQ of a penis. His father was a right wing
psychotic who denounced the Vatican in 1964 in a break-away cult that
was banned by the Pope. Not many adherents follow this sect, it is
like the Moonies, although much much smaller and they do not have the
backing of our CIA like the Rev. Moon's Korean outfit, nor the Dalai
Lama [another CIA stooge who would be nothing without CIA backing].
Mel Gibson is one of the cultists, but never too evident especially if
it gets in the way of making big bucks -- making blockbuster and
ballbuster movies with his imprimatur swashbuckled onto it. BRAVEHEART
was this bad actor's first stab at directing, and man was that one
assbackwards and messed up film, with Mel in every frame as tall as
Hercules on the Scottish battlefields saving Scotland from all of Mel
Gibson's fantasy foes, which did not dovetail with historical record.
He is very short and must have a peewee's inferiority complex [short
and numb in the intellectual range of fine calibrated minds -- i.e.,
exhibitionistically dumb] and to compensate he is overweeningly
ambitious, rigorously stumping for himself. He patently hides behind
cliches, Christian fundamentalist cartoon stick figures, in order to
aggrandize himself. He is no artist, no director, no writer, no
thinker, no intellectual. He is Mad Max, period, an action actor like
Sylvester Stallone. I think Stallone directed a few movies too, that
are equally bad, maybe even better.
You have a lot of loftier things to do with your head than dwell on
media hype that is generated by Mel's cult looking for a billion bucks
-- along with Moneybags Mel, the saintly one.
I saw the trailers. To be pretentiously historic the characters speak
Aramaic and Latin depending on whether they were a jew or a roman
soldier. The Romans were murderous back then, and the jews just
fiddled along with the dictator's impulses just like Bulgaria or
Ecuador today when GW Bush rattles his sabers. The elite Jews then
were protecting their own asses in a world where every ***** was up for
execution. Not a very pretty reality, not very admirable for the elite
jews of the time, but nothing like Gibson's movie, anyway, every group
was copping out back then with an excuse to follow the Roman Emperor,
or else you were pulled apart on a wheel while dogs ate your
intestines. Something like the way GW Bush disregarded the UN leading
up to the pointless attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq.
Why Mel Brooks -- [I mean Mel Gibson] -- picked CHRIST'S PASSION and
made every minute of our honored protagonist's bible book death so
brutal and so violent as to deserve an R rating [with no sex in it --
unless all the rapping with vampiric Satan is pillow talk], is because
monkeying around Mel Gibson really had nothing to say, he never was a
thinker and he never had an idea of his own in his head his entire
breathing existence, so he latched onto Christ, an easy plot that
millions will applaud. Also, he picked the Bible theme because he is a
Mammonist who appreciates deeply both money and self-aggrandizement,
with rivers of blood and tableaus of torture for good measure.
He is a little punk who was the son of a lottery winner in the USA who
had 8 kids or so and moved to Australia with the $27,000 to start a
new life for his kids and family during the Vietnam Era when his sons
were up for the draft. It worked. Mel, like GW, dodged war and then
spent his whole friggin life glorifying war and his own deluded and
non-existent heroism. Sticky, adhesive, in your face -- nasty bat
guano. Nothing more and smells just as rat-like.
Anyone with 80 million dollars to burn and the support of
quasi-Masonic organizations [look at Gibson's films from whence he
started to co-produce -- just after he had pocketed around $100
million personally for LETHAL WEAPONs 1 thru 1000 -- and you will see
Masonic-emblem pyramids in backgrounds where they don't really belong
but look compelling and artsy, etc.]. Anyone with at least one million
bucks can hire out a genius cameraman and a top notch Euro art
director to make any film look atmospheric, even a soft porno movie
that is for different reasons rated R. Take your kids to see Delta of
Venus, and they will be spared a brutal crucifiction but may learn
that it is very difficult to be killed by kisses [even Judas
tongue-in-cheek, considered]. Then they might have a passion for life
rather than a passion for death, which seems to be the theme of our
new millenium.
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
What is really funny is that you call Mel Gibson dumb, a hypocrite, a cultist, a
Mammonist, a little punk , nasty bat
guano, and a supporter of Masonic organizations. First, Catholics do not like the Masons,
they are enmities with them.
Now, to the real reason I am replying, which is two fold. First, you rant and rave about
Gibson and call him all kinds of names, but if someone says ONE TRUTHFUL thing that isn't
PRO JEW you would call them an anti-semite. I think the blacks calling everyone a racist
if they say anything in a negative tone about their race learned it from the Jews.
Secondly, you hate Gibson so much but you saw all his films !!! Why after telling us how
bad his movies are did you go back to see more? Either your a fool or a liar, in which
case I tend to believe both are true.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Harford" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
04 Mar 2004 11:34:35 PM |
|
|
--
"Moses Gibson" <moses_gibson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:113f8369.0403031821.8638cac@posting.google.com...
El culo ... one's bum, etc. Not to be used for ...
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Lethal Question:
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
Hmmmm...
Maybe to illustrate the point that we ALL (including Gibson) were
responsible
for His death?
---------------------------------------------------------------
"I was hugging a woman and we were jumping up and down and embracing and
then I realized that it wasn't love but the Yankees had just won the World
Series."
Larry David
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim May" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
05 Mar 2004 12:02:47 AM |
|
|
In article <JqOdnXAE_-3xjNXdRVn-hg@comcast.com>, Bill Harford
<password@fidelio.com> wrote:
....
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
Hmmmm...
Maybe to illustrate the point that we ALL (including Gibson) were
responsible
for His death?
Utter *****. I wasn't even _born_ until 1951, so how could I
possibly have aided the Jews and Romans in their kiling of this Jesus
person, if he ever actually existed?
Christer nonsense.
Not even the Christer god, not even YWHWHWNEN of the Jews, not even
Allah, not even Yog-Sottheth, not even Baal, can alter space-time and
causal lattices so as to have a person born today be responsible for
some lynching of a drifter nearly 2000 years ago.
--Tim May
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff Liebermann" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
05 Mar 2004 10:01:22 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:02:47 -0800, Tim May
<timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote:
In article <JqOdnXAE_-3xjNXdRVn-hg@comcast.com>, Bill Harford
<password@fidelio.com> wrote:
...
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
Hmmmm...
Maybe to illustrate the point that we ALL (including Gibson) were
responsible
for His death?
Utter *****. I wasn't even _born_ until 1951, so how could I
possibly have aided the Jews and Romans in their kiling of this Jesus
person, if he ever actually existed?
Christer nonsense.
Not even the Christer god, not even YWHWHWNEN of the Jews, not even
Allah, not even Yog-Sottheth, not even Baal, can alter space-time and
causal lattices so as to have a person born today be responsible for
some lynching of a drifter nearly 2000 years ago.
--Tim May
It's easy to explain. There are several historical points you've
overlooked. Biblical contracts apply to the descendents.
1. Original sin. Adam and Eve were evicted from the Garden of Eden
for indecent exposure and pilfering the orchard. The eviction notice
applies to all their descendents. You are expected to atone for their
actions by maintaining a righteous existence and petition for
re-admittance.
2. Contract Law. Abraham negotiates a covenant with God that
includes protecting the rights of his descendents. In trade, Abraham
and his descendents are expected to recognize the monopoly position of
the one true God. Somewhere along your ancestral line, I'm certain
you mush have Hebraic ancestry as indicated by your ability to collect
money.
3. Salvage contract. Noah also made a contract with God for salvage
right to humanity in trade for the necessary building permits to
construct an ark within the city limits. Noah's descendents, Shem,
Ham, and Japheth, are designated the fathers of all the nations. In
trade for saving your ancestral *****, the contract specifies
everlasting devotion from their descendents. That includes you.
It should be obvious that all biblical decrees, covenants, and
contracts apply to the descendents. The threat of eternal damnation
should be sufficient incentive to honor these contracts.
The situation surrounding the execution of Jesus is a bit more
complex. Due process was observed, but Jesus was not adequately
represented by counsel. Just about everyone involved was in favour of
the execution. His only defense was presented by the judge (Pontious
Pilate), who eventually gave in to public and political pressure. In
other words, almost everyone involved was responsible.
The magnitude of the problem was not evident until the resurrection,
where it became obvious that killing the son of God may have been a
major screwup. In order to minimize the individual responsibility,
the blame was uniformly distributed among all the people. Selective
enforcement by divine retribution would have been an option, but was
not applied for reasons unknown.
Therefore, as a marginal member of the human race, a descendent of the
perpetrators, and as biblical law applies to the descendents, you are
at least partially to blame. Biblical law also follows the deep
pockets rule, where in the absence of major culprit, a fractional
percentage of the blame equates to assuming all responsibility.
Therefore, you can be judged by the part, and sentenced for the whole.
Hopefully this explains your responsibilities and will set you on a
path of righteous living and conscientious behavior.
--
Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
(831)421-6491 pgr (831)336-2558 home
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
.
|
|
|
| User: "John R Pierce" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
05 Mar 2004 10:34:22 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 08:01:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
<jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
Selective enforcement by divine retribution would have been an option, but
was not applied for reasons unknown.
Reason? GUILT! As long as the sheeple are feeling guilty, they can be
controlled.
...
Hopefully this explains your responsibilities and will set you on a
path of righteous living and conscientious behavior.
Um... Jeff? Do you have any tips for cleaning coffee out of a keyboard
and CRT? At least its black, and unsweetened...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff Liebermann" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
05 Mar 2004 12:03:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 08:34:22 -0800, John R Pierce <spam@is.invalid>
wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 08:01:22 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
<jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
Selective enforcement by divine retribution would have been an option, but
was not applied for reasons unknown.
Reason? GUILT! As long as the sheeple are feeling guilty, they can be
controlled.
If someone killed my son, and I happen to be in a position of (devine)
power, I would certainly be pissed and thinking in terms of devine
retribution or massacre of the culprits. Why this was not done is
rather odd as the same God did not hesitate to exterminate Sodom and
Gomorrah for the lesser crime of lewd and licivious behavior. We can
speculate as to the reason for this inconsistant and illogical
behavior, but I suspect that it may have been something simple, like
forgetfulness. If this is the case, reminding God of the incident, is
a rather bad idea.
I forgot to include Moses who made a deal with God, which granted the
Hebrews most favored nations status, 40 years of subsidies, and a
promise of some land, in trade for some severe lifestyle restrictions.
The contract also applied to future generations. The terms were
innumerated in the first 10 articles and expanded upon by many
generations of rabbis and attorneys. The most favored nation status
has been of little use. However, a deal is a deal, and the Children
of God(tm) have been fairly good at following at least the first 10
articles.
Hopefully this explains your responsibilities and will set you on a
path of righteous living and conscientious behavior.
Um... Jeff? Do you have any tips for cleaning coffee out of a keyboard
and CRT? At least its black, and unsweetened...
Sigh. The pharmacist has some kind of purple pill that will take care
of Usenet reflux disease.
Methinks, the keyboard is best replaced. However, I suggest a
protective cover for the replacement until the pill can be obtained.
http://www.protectcovers.com
Fellowes makes a rather expensive LCD protector. However, any screen
glare protector will work. Keeping a towel nearby might also be
useful.
--
Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
(831)421-6491 pgr (831)336-2558 home
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us
.
|
|
|
| User: "John R Pierce" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
05 Mar 2004 05:35:25 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:03:10 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
<jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us> wrote:
If someone killed my son, and I happen to be in a position of (devine)
power, I would certainly be pissed and thinking in terms of devine
retribution or massacre of the culprits. Why this was not done is
rather odd as the same God did not hesitate to exterminate Sodom and
Gomorrah for the lesser crime of lewd and licivious behavior.
didn't you get the memo? Violence is OK, but pleasure isn't.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
03 Mar 2004 10:45:50 PM |
|
|
(Moses Gibson) wrote:
El culo ... one's bum, etc. Not to be used for ...
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Lethal Question:
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
Mel Gibson is one dumb and grasping devil-may-care ambitious
hypocrite, with the IQ of a penis. His father was a right wing
psychotic who denounced the Vatican in 1964 in a break-away cult that
was banned by the Pope. Not many adherents follow this sect, it is
like the Moonies, although much much smaller and they do not have the
backing of our CIA like the Rev. Moon's Korean outfit, nor the Dalai
Lama [another CIA stooge who would be nothing without CIA backing].
Mel Gibson is one of the cultists, but never too evident especially if
it gets in the way of making big bucks -- making blockbuster and
ballbuster movies with his imprimatur swashbuckled onto it. BRAVEHEART
was this bad actor's first stab at directing, and man was that one
assbackwards and messed up film, with Mel in every frame as tall as
Hercules on the Scottish battlefields saving Scotland from all of Mel
Gibson's fantasy foes, which did not dovetail with historical record.
He is very short and must have a peewee's inferiority complex [short
and numb in the intellectual range of fine calibrated minds -- i.e.,
exhibitionistically dumb] and to compensate he is overweeningly
ambitious, rigorously stumping for himself. He patently hides behind
cliches, Christian fundamentalist cartoon stick figures, in order to
aggrandize himself. He is no artist, no director, no writer, no
thinker, no intellectual. He is Mad Max, period, an action actor like
Sylvester Stallone. I think Stallone directed a few movies too, that
are equally bad, maybe even better.
You have a lot of loftier things to do with your head than dwell on
media hype that is generated by Mel's cult looking for a billion bucks
-- along with Moneybags Mel, the saintly one.
I saw the trailers. To be pretentiously historic the characters speak
Aramaic and Latin depending on whether they were a jew or a roman
soldier. The Romans were murderous back then, and the jews just
fiddled along with the dictator's impulses just like Bulgaria or
Ecuador today when GW Bush rattles his sabers. The elite Jews then
were protecting their own asses in a world where every ***** was up for
execution. Not a very pretty reality, not very admirable for the elite
jews of the time, but nothing like Gibson's movie, anyway, every group
was copping out back then with an excuse to follow the Roman Emperor,
or else you were pulled apart on a wheel while dogs ate your
intestines. Something like the way GW Bush disregarded the UN leading
up to the pointless attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq.
Why Mel Brooks -- [I mean Mel Gibson] -- picked CHRIST'S PASSION and
made every minute of our honored protagonist's bible book death so
brutal and so violent as to deserve an R rating [with no sex in it --
unless all the rapping with vampiric Satan is pillow talk], is because
monkeying around Mel Gibson really had nothing to say, he never was a
thinker and he never had an idea of his own in his head his entire
breathing existence, so he latched onto Christ, an easy plot that
millions will applaud. Also, he picked the Bible theme because he is a
Mammonist who appreciates deeply both money and self-aggrandizement,
with rivers of blood and tableaus of torture for good measure.
He is a little punk who was the son of a lottery winner in the USA who
had 8 kids or so and moved to Australia with the $27,000 to start a
new life for his kids and family during the Vietnam Era when his sons
were up for the draft. It worked. Mel, like GW, dodged war and then
spent his whole friggin life glorifying war and his own deluded and
non-existent heroism. Sticky, adhesive, in your face -- nasty bat
guano. Nothing more and smells just as rat-like.
Anyone with 80 million dollars to burn and the support of
quasi-Masonic organizations [look at Gibson's films from whence he
started to co-produce -- just after he had pocketed around $100
million personally for LETHAL WEAPONs 1 thru 1000 -- and you will see
Masonic-emblem pyramids in backgrounds where they don't really belong
but look compelling and artsy, etc.]. Anyone with at least one million
bucks can hire out a genius cameraman and a top notch Euro art
director to make any film look atmospheric, even a soft porno movie
that is for different reasons rated R. Take your kids to see Delta of
Venus, and they will be spared a brutal crucifiction but may learn
that it is very difficult to be killed by kisses [even Judas
tongue-in-cheek, considered]. Then they might have a passion for life
rather than a passion for death, which seems to be the theme of our
new millenium.
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Why don't you FOAD, jewboy? We've already got a surfeit of Jews on
this ng. Take your obnoxious yiddish whining elsewhere, understood?
... Well, what are you hanging around for? Beat it!
Grantland
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
04 Mar 2004 01:27:52 AM |
|
|
"Grantland" <mithril@iafrica.com> wrote in message
news:4046b373.141404128@ct-news.iafrica.com...
moses_gibson@hotmail.com (Moses Gibson) wrote:
El culo ... one's bum, etc. Not to be used for ...
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Lethal Question:
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
Because Mel Gibson is mentally ill, as most of his movies show with
their gore and torture scenes. Even in "The Patriot" where he couldn't
have an outright torture scene, he managed to burn a bunch of men,
women and children to death in a church - something that never
happened during the Revolutionary War. He either elaborates on
something that really happened, to make it even worse, or he invents
phony history to titilate the gore feasters.
Mel Gibson is one dumb and grasping devil-may-care ambitious
hypocrite, with the IQ of a penis. His father was a right wing
psychotic who denounced the Vatican in 1964 in a break-away cult that
was banned by the Pope. Not many adherents follow this sect, it is
like the Moonies, although much much smaller and they do not have the
backing of our CIA like the Rev. Moon's Korean outfit, nor the Dalai
Lama [another CIA stooge who would be nothing without CIA backing].
Mel Gibson is one of the cultists, but never too evident especially if
it gets in the way of making big bucks -- making blockbuster and
ballbuster movies with his imprimatur swashbuckled onto it. BRAVEHEART
was this bad actor's first stab at directing, and man was that one
assbackwards and messed up film, with Mel in every frame as tall as
Hercules on the Scottish battlefields saving Scotland from all of Mel
Gibson's fantasy foes, which did not dovetail with historical record.
He is very short and must have a peewee's inferiority complex [short
and numb in the intellectual range of fine calibrated minds -- i.e.,
exhibitionistically dumb] and to compensate he is overweeningly
ambitious, rigorously stumping for himself. He patently hides behind
cliches, Christian fundamentalist cartoon stick figures, in order to
aggrandize himself. He is no artist, no director, no writer, no
thinker, no intellectual. He is Mad Max, period, an action actor like
Sylvester Stallone. I think Stallone directed a few movies too, that
are equally bad, maybe even better.
You have a lot of loftier things to do with your head than dwell on
media hype that is generated by Mel's cult looking for a billion bucks
-- along with Moneybags Mel, the saintly one.
I saw the trailers. To be pretentiously historic the characters speak
Aramaic and Latin depending on whether they were a jew or a roman
soldier. The Romans were murderous back then, and the jews just
fiddled along with the dictator's impulses just like Bulgaria or
Ecuador today when GW Bush rattles his sabers. The elite Jews then
were protecting their own asses in a world where every ***** was up for
execution. Not a very pretty reality, not very admirable for the elite
jews of the time, but nothing like Gibson's movie, anyway, every group
was copping out back then with an excuse to follow the Roman Emperor,
or else you were pulled apart on a wheel while dogs ate your
intestines. Something like the way GW Bush disregarded the UN leading
up to the pointless attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq.
Why Mel Brooks -- [I mean Mel Gibson] -- picked CHRIST'S PASSION and
made every minute of our honored protagonist's bible book death so
brutal and so violent as to deserve an R rating [with no sex in it --
unless all the rapping with vampiric Satan is pillow talk], is because
monkeying around Mel Gibson really had nothing to say, he never was a
thinker and he never had an idea of his own in his head his entire
breathing existence, so he latched onto Christ, an easy plot that
millions will applaud. Also, he picked the Bible theme because he is a
Mammonist who appreciates deeply both money and self-aggrandizement,
with rivers of blood and tableaus of torture for good measure.
He is a little punk who was the son of a lottery winner in the USA who
had 8 kids or so and moved to Australia with the $27,000 to start a
new life for his kids and family during the Vietnam Era when his sons
were up for the draft. It worked. Mel, like GW, dodged war and then
spent his whole friggin life glorifying war and his own deluded and
non-existent heroism. Sticky, adhesive, in your face -- nasty bat
guano. Nothing more and smells just as rat-like.
Anyone with 80 million dollars to burn and the support of
quasi-Masonic organizations [look at Gibson's films from whence he
started to co-produce -- just after he had pocketed around $100
million personally for LETHAL WEAPONs 1 thru 1000 -- and you will see
Masonic-emblem pyramids in backgrounds where they don't really belong
but look compelling and artsy, etc.]. Anyone with at least one million
bucks can hire out a genius cameraman and a top notch Euro art
director to make any film look atmospheric, even a soft porno movie
that is for different reasons rated R. Take your kids to see Delta of
Venus, and they will be spared a brutal crucifiction but may learn
that it is very difficult to be killed by kisses [even Judas
tongue-in-cheek, considered]. Then they might have a passion for life
rather than a passion for death, which seems to be the theme of our
new millenium.
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Why don't you FOAD, jewboy? We've already got a surfeit of Jews on
this ng. Take your obnoxious yiddish whining elsewhere, understood?
.. Well, what are you hanging around for? Beat it!
Grantland
And, who the hell are you, Mr. Bigot, to have anything
at all to say anywhere? I'm seeing Moses Gibson's
(probably a fake name) article in alt.atheism, and I agree
with him completely. I'm also seeing your response to him,
and all you're writing is mud.
Mel Gibson is a religious fanatic, so it isn't surprising
that he would be out to make as much money as he can
as hypocritically as possible. That's the way religious
fanatics work. They say one thing and do another. And,
the only thing Mel Gibson is good at at this point is
being a hypocrite. You, on the other hand, are only good
at... nothing. You're not even a good troll. Sad.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list #1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight Who Says SPONG!
EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
|
| User: "Moses Gibson" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
04 Mar 2004 04:31:39 PM |
|
|
Thank you for your conscientiousness, Michelle.
Moses
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message news
"El culo ... one's bum, etc. Not to be used for ..."
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Lethal Question:
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
Because Mel Gibson is mentally ill, as most of his movies show with
their gore and torture scenes. Even in "The Patriot" where he couldn't
have an outright torture scene, he managed to burn a bunch of men,
women and children to death in a church - something that never
happened during the Revolutionary War. He either elaborates on
something that really happened, to make it even worse, or he invents
phony history to titilate the gore feasters.
------------------------------------------------------
Mel Gibson is one dumb and grasping devil-may-care ambitious
hypocrite, with the IQ of a penis. His father was a right wing
psychotic who denounced the Vatican in 1964 in a break-away cult that
was banned by the Pope. Not many adherents follow this sect, it is
like the Moonies, although much much smaller and they do not have the
backing of our CIA like the Rev. Moon's Korean outfit, nor the Dalai
Lama [another CIA stooge who would be nothing without CIA backing].
Mel Gibson is one of the cultists, but never too evident especially if
it gets in the way of making big bucks -- making blockbuster and
ballbuster movies with his imprimatur swashbuckled onto it. BRAVEHEART
was this bad actor's first stab at directing, and man was that one
assbackwards and messed up film, with Mel in every frame as tall as
Hercules on the Scottish battlefields saving Scotland from all of Mel
Gibson's fantasy foes, which did not dovetail with historical record.
He is very short and must have a peewee's inferiority complex [short
and numb in the intellectual range of fine calibrated minds -- i.e.,
exhibitionistically dumb] and to compensate he is overweeningly
ambitious, rigorously stumping for himself. He patently hides behind
cliches, Christian fundamentalist cartoon stick figures, in order to
aggrandize himself. He is no artist, no director, no writer, no
thinker, no intellectual. He is Mad Max, period, an action actor like
Sylvester Stallone. I think Stallone directed a few movies too, that
are equally bad, maybe even better.
You have a lot of loftier things to do with your head than dwell on
media hype that is generated by Mel's cult looking for a billion bucks
-- along with Moneybags Mel, the saintly one.
I saw the trailers. To be pretentiously historic the characters speak
Aramaic and Latin depending on whether they were a jew or a roman
soldier. The Romans were murderous back then, and the jews just
fiddled along with the dictator's impulses just like Bulgaria or
Ecuador today when GW Bush rattles his sabers. The elite Jews then
were protecting their own asses in a world where every ***** was up for
execution. Not a very pretty reality, not very admirable for the elite
jews of the time, but nothing like Gibson's movie, anyway, every group
was copping out back then with an excuse to follow the Roman Emperor,
or else you were pulled apart on a wheel while dogs ate your
intestines. Something like the way GW Bush disregarded the UN leading
up to the pointless attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq.
Why Mel Brooks -- [I mean Mel Gibson] -- picked CHRIST'S PASSION and
made every minute of our honored protagonist's bible book death so
brutal and so violent as to deserve an R rating [with no sex in it --
unless all the rapping with vampiric Satan is pillow talk], is because
monkeying around Mel Gibson really had nothing to say, he never was a
thinker and he never had an idea of his own in his head his entire
breathing existence, so he latched onto Christ, an easy plot that
millions will applaud. Also, he picked the Bible theme because he is a
Mammonist who appreciates deeply both money and self-aggrandizement,
with rivers of blood and tableaus of torture for good measure.
He is a little punk who was the son of a lottery winner in the USA who
had 8 kids or so and moved to Australia with the $27,000 to start a
new life for his kids and family during the Vietnam Era when his sons
were up for the draft. It worked. Mel, like GW, dodged war and then
spent his whole friggin life glorifying war and his own deluded and
non-existent heroism. Sticky, adhesive, in your face -- nasty bat
guano. Nothing more and smells just as rat-like.
Anyone with 80 million dollars to burn and the support of
quasi-Masonic organizations [look at Gibson's films from whence he
started to co-produce -- just after he had pocketed around $100
million personally for LETHAL WEAPONs 1 thru 1000 -- and you will see
Masonic-emblem pyramids in backgrounds where they don't really belong
but look compelling and artsy, etc.]. Anyone with at least one million
bucks can hire out a genius cameraman and a top notch Euro art
director to make any film look atmospheric, even a soft porno movie
that is for different reasons rated R. Take your kids to see Delta of
Venus, and they will be spared a brutal crucifiction but may learn
that it is very difficult to be killed by kisses [even Judas
tongue-in-cheek, considered]. Then they might have a passion for life
rather than a passion for death, which seems to be the theme of our
new millenium.
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Why don't you FOAD, jewboy? We've already got a surfeit of Jews on
this ng. Take your obnoxious yiddish whining elsewhere, understood?
.. Well, what are you hanging around for? Beat it!
Grantland
I'm seeing Moses Gibson's article in other groups, and I agree
with him completely. I'm also seeing your response to him,
and all you're writing is mud.
Mel Gibson is a religious fanatic, so it isn't surprising
that he would be out to make as much money as he can
as hypocritically as possible. That's the way religious
fanatics work. They say one thing and do another. And,
the only thing Mel Gibson is good at at this point is
being a hypocrite. You, on the other hand, are only good
at... nothing. You're not even a good troll. Sad.
-------------
MEL GIBSON: "Read my lips", as George Herbert Walker use to say.
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
The Catholic Church has disavowed any association with Mel Gibson's
looney father and with the gay bashing ["an ***** is only for caca"]
Mel Gibson also.
The Vatican has retreated from this ejaculatory MEL'S PASSION movie
and wants no part of it now or tomorrow or for the rest of eternity.
Mel and his creator, Papa Gibson, both perhaps schizophrenic or still
in recovery from crack [read David Ickes], are lucky they have not
been publicly thrashed and gouged by the Papal united cardinals of
Rome in a publicly televised ex-communication. Mel Gibson's clay
footed sect in Malibu is not legitimized or validated by any higher
authority, other than by Mel's ego when he is high as a kite or simply
remembering his cocaine decades.
Thus, my nimble witted genius, Mr. Irony, if one angers the Church of
Rome and the entire Catholic orthodoxy, isn't that the same type of
gleeful satisfaction that a Mason would inarguably enjoy?
There is no better taste in the mouth than when two enemies watch
their third common enemy go down in flames and dishonor and ignomy.
If you still cannot grasp this, out of ignorance or obstinance, the
Catholic Church is the enemy of both Mel Gibson's cult AND the
Freemasons.
Now the Hospitallers, that is another story for several nights of
malta.
Moses
"Irony Alert" <Driver@StealthTrucks.COM> wrote in message
news:<p5z1c.109958$Xp.485787@attbi_s54>...
Excuse me, but isn't if fucking unlikely that Gibson can be a
ultra-traditionalist Catholic and a Free mason at the same time
considering how the Catholic Church and the Freemasons hate each other's
guts?
What the ***** are you talking about?
"Moses Gibson" <moses_gibson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:113f8369.0403031816.1ef1c920@posting.google.com...
http://passion-of-melgibson.tripod.com/LETHALWEAPON.html
Lethal Question:
Why did Mel Gibson, especially since he "loves" Jesus so much, use his
own left hand in a vain gesture to be a peer of Alfred Hitchcock,
hammer the fateful nail into Christ's hand, immortalizing his own
fingers on celluloid as the culprits of the sin?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Bloom" |
|
| Title: Re: Gibson apologizes to gays for his rude 1992 remark that "it is only for defecation" |
04 Mar 2004 06:59:11 PM |
|
|
Mel Gibson,
You do know that Mel Gibson is a bisexual.
When he is looking at his wife he is really dreaming of Mic Jagger.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DevilzOwn" |
|
| Title: Re: Go away |
01 Apr 2004 12:22:26 PM |
|
|
Actually, I used that most vile of books... your bible... Your much
lauded John 3:16 to be precise. "For god so loved the workd that he
gave his only begotten son so that whohever believes in him shall not
perish but have everlasting life."
Please be so kind as to point out where the "gnashing teeth of
damnation" come into play?
Ben
www.devilzown.com
crewfan_88@yahoo.com (blacknblue) wrote in message news:<b7362ea0.0403300705.638ae0f6@posting.google.com>...
Ben Schultz <ben@devilzown.com> wrote in message news:<g7th6016kafojf89k607h6mlrs6r5mkup4@4ax.com>...
Actually, it just says we perish... No damnation, no burning pit of
sulfur, just perish... Quite frankly, that is an acceptable prospect
considering the alternative...
did you pull that one out from the satanic bible...new age hippy
*****. Christ will forgive if you repent. But for those who love
their wickedness, the just damnation ye shell recieveth!
peace,
bnb
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Little Orphan Anomy" |
|
| Title: Re: Go away |
01 Apr 2004 07:00:16 PM |
|
|
well if it has its own website...it must be true!
crewfan_88@yahoo.com (blacknblue) wrote in message news:<b7362ea0.0403302032.5022183c@posting.google.com>...
William Klee <fnordy2k@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<300320041633013835%fnordy2k@yahoo.com>...
In article <b7362ea0.0403300705.638ae0f6@posting.google.com>,
blacknblue <crewfan_88@yahoo.com> wrote:
Ben Schultz <ben@devilzown.com> wrote in message
news:<g7th6016kafojf89k607h6mlrs6r5mkup4@4ax.com>...
Actually, it just says we perish... No damnation, no burning pit of
sulfur, just perish... Quite frankly, that is an acceptable prospect
considering the alternative...
did you pull that one out from the satanic bible...new age hippy
*****. Christ will forgive if you repent. But for those who love
their wickedness, the just damnation ye shell recieveth!
If you're an example of christian love, give me hell any day.
You don't want DAMNATION!!! for salvation please visit site:
http://www.jesus-is-lord.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Newt Gingrich Apologizes to Hardworking Mexican-Americans, En Espanol
Karl Rove is a tit-for-tat, political strategist who thinks that Ross Perrot stole the election from George Bush in 1992
@ DID CHRIST COME IN 70 AD , 1914 , 1950 , 1984 ,1988 ,1992 ? @
Whenever someone calls gays "faggots" -- you have a MINDLESS BIGOT with NO credibility present.
Re: Vatican takes tough line on ordination of gays
Re: God Needs Gays
Will Gays be saved?
Christian Senetenced for Trying to Kill Gays (J Young Christian of the Day)
| J Young Christian Morality: 72 YO MI Man BEATEN TO DEATH For Being Gay (Praise Jesus! Kill Gays! Hate the Sin! Hallelujah!)
Wow shitface Bible John hates gays and homosexuals too!
Gays in The Bible
Unable to Lynch Blacks, Alabama Christians Take It Out on Gays
The LANDMARK Event!! Mayor Gavin Newsom : Gays :: Rosa Parks : Blacks
Joining the Catholics, the KKK Protests against Gays in Austin, TX
Re: -- Christian Love for Gays {Senate Legal & Constitutional Committee regarding Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill 2004}
|
|
|
