Religions > Bible > God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years.
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"John P. Boatwright" |
| Date: |
07 Nov 2004 08:15:25 AM |
| Object: |
God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
God said what happens in mountain range formation:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/hills.htm
But what did science do? They then went off saying
NOTHING did it, when NOTHING never said what it did,
and NOTHING never laid claim to having done it in
the first place.
Science is thousands of years behind what the creator
had already said.
God's words have proven that he is the source of it all.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
.
|
|
| User: "Misty" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behindby thousands of years. |
29 Nov 2004 01:46:13 AM |
|
|
HEllo BDK,
The bible is not just a book; it is a library with 66 books by
44 authors.
It is divided onto 2 realms the first realm is the testimony of
what is called the Old Testament, the second realm is the testimony
of what is called the New testament.
These 2 are called witnesses and though they are over 350 years apart
at the closest point, they both agree 100%.
So it is not "just a book" but a book of books.
Misty,
BDK wrote:
In article <41A85A23.71F7@For-God.net>,
says...
BDK wrote:
In article <41A6AA1B.2A7@For-God.net>,
At the start of Daniel 9, Daniel is asking God to forgive
them. They were looking and/or waiting for their messiah.
God told Daniel through the angel that their messiah would
be rejected by his kinsmen, beaten, mutilated and killed
while sins would end.
That's Jesus... the messiah... rejected by the Jews,
his own kinsmen.
The timing given in Daniel 9, matches when Jesus showed up.
His kinsmen rejecting him, still goes on even today.
Again, on what planet and in what dimension does the
above make any sense whatsoever??
This planet, this dimension.
No Boaty, only to you and the other poor demented
loons..
John, you have to know by now, that even believers think
your site is a "loon site". If you don't, WAKE UP!!
Which matters most:
* saying God is right
* making people happy
I think the first one matters most.
So, you admit the truth, eh??
Exactly, saying God is right is the important item.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
No, Jesus was probably a fictional character.
Josephus recorded differently.
It's a book Boaty!! They can put anything they want into
it, and they did! It's called a STORY.
Yes and that story is about the place you live in.
It is called Creation!
The Bible is the hand book for your body too because you
are a Creature.
MIsty, also
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
Oh boy, here we go with the planet density kookery
again..
I guess brains don't heal...
If you understood it, it then becomes obvious.
Oh, I understand. It's obvious that you're still a
whackaloon...
BDK
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
25 Nov 2004 10:43:08 PM |
|
|
On 25 Nov 2004, John P. Boatwright dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
Which matters most:
* saying God is right
* making people happy
I think the first one matters most.
Why didn't he make it right in the first place, so we wouldn't all be
arguing about whether or not we need this "savior"?
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 11:58:20 AM |
|
|
On 07 Nov 2004, John P. Boatwright dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
God said what happens in mountain range formation:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/hills.htm
Ahh, so the earth has foundations and does not move.
But what did science do? They then went off saying
NOTHING did it, when NOTHING never said what it did,
and NOTHING never laid claim to having done it in
the first place.
Job 38 says nothing of earthquakes, volcanism and plate techtonics, which
are what actually created (and are still creating) mountains.
Science is thousands of years behind what the creator
had already said.
You have that backwards, of course. And science would be thousands of
years ahead of where it is now if it wasn't for your backwater religion
blocking scientific progress because it steps all over your sorry-*****
scriptures.
God's words have proven that he is the source of it all.
Circular argument, chump.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P. Boatwright" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 12:17:19 PM |
|
|
I think they're nailed on this one... God's analogy is
just too close to what they say present day... and no
one back then could see it, or understood it.
John P. Boatwright wrote:
Vic Sagerquist wrote:
On 07 Nov 2004, John P. Boatwright dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
God said what happens in mountain range formation:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/hills.htm
Ahh, so the earth has foundations and does not move.
Who ever said the earth doesn't move?
The foundations of the earth, are the initial matter
being gathered together at the start of the planets
forming... the dust cloud becoming the dust disk, the
bands and openings int he dust disk...
See Job... see the bands and openings... in some bibles
it's called "bars and doors".
Understand?
God said there's a cloud at the start, a DUST CLOUD
at the start of the solar system... bands and openings
in the dust disk as the planets form... the "waters"
gush out of the exploding star and you get a DUST CLOUD
from that... at the foundations of the earth.
God said it's as a womb, waters gushing out, the dark
band...
Don't you understand what he's saying?
God was saying such so that THEY thousands of years
ago, could pass it on... and we now know he was right.
But what did science do? They then went off saying
NOTHING did it, when NOTHING never said what it did,
and NOTHING never laid claim to having done it in
the first place.
Job 38 says nothing of earthquakes, volcanism and plate techtonics, which
are what actually created (and are still creating) mountains.
The "ends of the earth" are those plates where they meet.
Every verse, one after another confirmed it and matches what
science says about mountain range formation:
* the dawn is held back there
* at the ends of the earth
* the wicked are shaken out there
* it's as a seal pushing into clay
* and stands out as a garment
Those were said in these verses:
Job 38:12 Have you appointed the coming of daylight daily,
and caused the morning to show its place,
13 That it might be taken hold of at the ends of the
earth, And the wicked be shaken out of it?
14 It takes on form like clay under a seal, And
stands out like a garment.
All those happen at a mountain range. Science agrees.
Science is thousands of years behind what the creator
had already said.
You have that backwards, of course. And science would be thousands of
years ahead of where it is now if it wasn't for your backwater religion
blocking scientific progress because it steps all over your sorry-*****
scriptures.
You wish.
God's words have proven that he is the source of it all.
Circular argument, chump.
Circular arguments are what science presents when it says NOTHING
did it all... "just because science says so with no proof given
and no statement from NOTHING that it did anything".
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John P. Boatwright" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 04:10:42 PM |
|
|
Vic Sagerquist wrote:
I understand you are a kook, desparately trying to rationalize the
scriptures to make them say something that remotely resembles science.
I'm not buying it.
God said directly in the bible, that at the foundations of
the earth, that there was a dust cloud, "waters" gushing out,
bars and doors (bands and openings in the dust cloud), and
that there was THICK darkness... which is what you see
present day where that DUST CLOUD shoots out from the
star when it explodes. They have to use infrared to see
through the dust cloud... 'cuz in visible light, you can't
see through it... so God was right about said THICK darkness.
How is it that you can't understand what God said?
That's some powerful blindness guy... God meant what
he said when he said some wouldn't be able to see or
understand.
The stuff is being spelled out right in front of you,
and you can't understand it.
God said there's a cloud at the start, a DUST CLOUD
at the start of the solar system... bands and openings
in the dust disk as the planets form... the "waters"
gush out of the exploding star and you get a DUST CLOUD
from that... at the foundations of the earth.
God also said there is a firmament, a dome that covers the [flat] earth
[with its foundations beneath], from which he hung the stars, which are
capable of falling from the sky. This is enough for me to debunk the
rest of that moldy book of yours.
Where did God say the firmament is a dome?
Where did God say the earth is flat?
Where did God say the stars hang on a foundation?
The stars have been brought right down to earth, recently,
telescopes dropping them right down in front of you.
Are you denying it?
Are you saying you've never seen a star up close that you
can't see with your unaided eyes right here on earth?
God said it's as a womb, waters gushing out, the dark
band...
Don't you understand what he's saying?
He's not saying anything, Boaty. You're saying it.
You obviously haven't seen what said firmament exploded out
stars look like... the "waters" having been shot out... the
thick darkness shot out... that firmament ring shot out...
God was saying such so that THEY thousands of years
ago, could pass it on... and we now know he was right.
You do realize, of course, that the writers of the NT thought the end-
times would happen within the lives of the desciples, don't you?
It says some would SEE it... John saw it and described it
in Revelation.
But what did science do? They then went off saying
NOTHING did it, when NOTHING never said what it did,
and NOTHING never laid claim to having done it in
the first place.
Job 38 says nothing of earthquakes, volcanism and plate techtonics,
which are what actually created (and are still creating) mountains.
The "ends of the earth" are those plates where they meet.
Every verse, one after another confirmed it and matches what
science says about mountain range formation:
* the dawn is held back there
* at the ends of the earth
* the wicked are shaken out there
* it's as a seal pushing into clay
* and stands out as a garment
*****. "The ends of the earth" meant just that - until it was proven
much later on that the earth was a globe. You are aware that Galileo was
placed under house arrest by the Spanish Inquisition for making that
discovery, right?
The land ends at the sea, does it not?
Isn't that a "land end" too?
There are lots of "ends of the earth", take your pick. None
of them say the earth is flat... YOU are saying that.
Please point out where in the bible that God said the earth is flat.
That is something MEN thought through their mis-understanding,
it's not something God said.
The Pope and church... they've said they're infallible in the past,
clearly they were not.
I don't follow said Pope, or that church... it's of no concern to
me what they belived before, did before, etc... they were wrong,
God was right.
Your attempt to "science-ify" the bible is as pathetic as playing 60s
rock albums backwards to find hidden messages.
Lame slam.
Those were said in these verses:
Job 38:12 Have you appointed the coming of daylight daily,
and caused the morning to show its place,
13 That it might be taken hold of at the ends of the
earth, And the wicked be shaken out of it?
14 It takes on form like clay under a seal, And
stands out like a garment.
All those happen at a mountain range. Science agrees.
Science has nothing to do with the "wicked". This is just religious
babble.
It's an accurate statement of things that happen at a
mountain range. The wicked being shaken there... oh well.
Science is thousands of years behind what the creator
had already said.
You have that backwards, of course. And science would be thousands
of years ahead of where it is now if it wasn't for your backwater
religion blocking scientific progress because it steps all over your
sorry-***** scriptures.
You wish.
Actually, I do wish science was a thousand years ahead of itself. Can
you imagine the things we would have seen in our lifetimes, if not for
your idiotic religion?
Who said someone religious wouldn't know about science or
do science daily?... other than you.
God's words have proven that he is the source of it all.
Circular argument, chump.
Circular arguments are what science presents when it says NOTHING
did it all... "just because science says so with no proof given
and no statement from NOTHING that it did anything".
Your reference to the bible to prove something in the bible is a circular
reference, AKA begging the question.
You did not refute the statement. Science says that NOTHING
is making everything... "just because science says NOTHING
made everything".
That's circular logic... that I should believe NOTHING made
everything because they said NOTHING made everything.
Who said science was right about it?... other than science?
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Neither ever existed.
Witnesses recorded such. You not believing them, that's your
"witnessing" of what you "know" or don't know. You not knowing
doesn't make them non-existant.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 09:42:08 PM |
|
|
On 07 Nov 2004, John P. Boatwright dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
Vic Sagerquist wrote:
I understand you are a kook, desparately trying to rationalize the
scriptures to make them say something that remotely resembles
science. I'm not buying it.
God said directly in the bible, <SLAP!>
Circular argument - discredits anything else you say. Snipped to save
bandwidth.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 04:51:57 PM |
|
|
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "John P. Boatwright" <name@For-God.net> on Sun, 07 Nov 2004 14:15:25 GMT
spoke:
God said what happens in mountain range formation:
You can make the Bible say ANYTHING,
if you pick and choose what lines you use,
and take them out of context.
--
The truth is out there,
but it's not interesting enough for most people.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P. Boatwright" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 04:58:21 PM |
|
|
Never anonymous Bud wrote:
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "John P. Boatwright" <name@For-God.net> on Sun, 07 Nov 2004 14:15:25 GMT
spoke:
God said what happens in mountain range formation:
You can make the Bible say ANYTHING,
if you pick and choose what lines you use,
and take them out of context.
Those three verses are one right after the other,
they all match what science says about moutain ranges
today.
You not liking it match... oh well.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Knight" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 07:26:41 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 "John P. Boatwright" woke up next to his drugged
and date raped hamster, barfed his beer dinner, swallowed ten
aspirins, crawled to his computer wondering why toilet paper was stuck
in his crack and typed:
Never anonymous Bud wrote:
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "John P. Boatwright" <name@For-God.net> on Sun, 07 Nov 2004 14:15:25 GMT
spoke:
God said what happens in mountain range formation:
You can make the Bible say ANYTHING,
if you pick and choose what lines you use,
and take them out of context.
Those three verses are one right after the other,
they all match what science says about moutain ranges
today.
You not liking it match... oh well.
Oh... Look at this! Bloaty pulled his pencil ***** out of his
hamster long enough to gibber his idiot drooling's in public.
Hey, Johnnie, it's a given you're an habitual masturbator, stalker
of drunken bimbo's and the roll model for all village idiots in the
universe and now you have the balls (tiny ones to be sure) to think (I
apologize for using that word in a sentence towards Bloaty....Don't
flame me.) that the Babble Book has science in it!?
FUCKWIT!
That's it! I'm going to unroll all my toilet paper and write your
name on each tissue. And I just bought a sixteen pack. It's going to
take days to do it but it'll be worth wiping the gravy off with you.
It'll last a long time too. I'm not a chick. I won't go through a roll
a day.
Wait! I'll get a stamp! It's quicker.
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
God doesn't exist and Jeebus had long hair and wore a dress.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P. Boatwright" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 11:27:19 PM |
|
|
Steve Knight wrote:
flame me.) that the Babble Book has science in it!?
Science studies what God made.
God in saying what he made... doesn't it make sense to you
that God's statements would match what is being studied?
God made it all, Jesus died for our sins.
Proof God described the planet density profile
BEFORE science did:
http://home.teleport.com/~salad/4god/density.htm
(see the 2 graphs, obviously God was right in Genesis)
Mirror site at: http://For-God.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: God described mountain range formation... science is only behind by thousands of years. |
07 Nov 2004 11:57:33 PM |
|
|
On 07 Nov 2004, John P. Boatwright dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
Steve Knight wrote:
flame me.) that the Babble Book has science in it!?
Science studies what God made.
Wrong, cowpie. Science studies what surrounds us. They've already
determined rather a few things that "god" could not have made, as described
in the bible.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
