| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Bill M" |
| Date: |
05 Jan 2007 07:24:06 PM |
| Object: |
GOD EVODENCE |
There is very simple yet compelling evidence that no gods exist except in
man's imagination.
Why is there NO objective verifiable evidence that ANY god has communicated
and confirmed his existence to ANY of the sane six billion people on this
earth?
The Templeton Foundation recognized that God is a scientific hypothesis - by
funding double-blind trials to test whether remote prayer would speed
the recovery of heart patients. It didn't, although a control
group who knew they had been prayed for tended to get worse. Despite such
well-financed efforts, no evidence for God's existence has yet been
obtained!
.
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
05 Jan 2007 09:17:13 PM |
|
|
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:OSCnh.45888$3v6.2646@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
There is very simple yet compelling evidence that no gods exist except in
man's imagination.
Why is there NO objective verifiable evidence that ANY god has
communicated
and confirmed his existence to ANY of the sane six billion people on this
earth?
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere you go, right
directly in front of your face.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
05 Jan 2007 10:25:33 PM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu55qc6o61s30@corp.supernews.com...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:OSCnh.45888$3v6.2646@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
There is very simple yet compelling evidence that no gods exist except in
man's imagination.
Why is there NO objective verifiable evidence that ANY god has
communicated
and confirmed his existence to ANY of the sane six billion people on this
earth?
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere you go,
right
directly in front of your face.
Really. How is it that I can point to the sun and you and I will both see
the same sun (unless you're blind), but when you point to 'God' I see
nothing?
And if you're going to say that the 'sun' is 'God' (in disguise) or
something along those lines, what are you going to say to person who insists
that the 'sun' is the Greek sun-god 'Helios'? How are you going to 'prove'
your assertion is true and not his? (Or mine that the 'sun' is *not* a
'God'?)
And might I add that blithely dispensing arrogant assertions does *nothing*
to 'prove' those assertions to be true. You're only embarrassing yourself by
asserting a claim that is *not* as evident as you make it out to be.
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
05 Jan 2007 10:30:22 PM |
|
|
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12pu968ldu9gie5@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu55qc6o61s30@corp.supernews.com...
"Bill M" <wmech@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:OSCnh.45888$3v6.2646@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
There is very simple yet compelling evidence that no gods exist except
in
man's imagination.
Why is there NO objective verifiable evidence that ANY god has
communicated
and confirmed his existence to ANY of the sane six billion people on
this
earth?
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere you go,
right
directly in front of your face.
Really. How is it that I can point to the sun and you and I will both see
the same sun (unless you're blind), but when you point to 'God' I see
nothing?
And if you're going to say that the 'sun' is 'God' (in disguise) or
something along those lines, what are you going to say to person who
insists
that the 'sun' is the Greek sun-god 'Helios'? How are you going to 'prove'
your assertion is true and not his? (Or mine that the 'sun' is *not* a
'God'?)
And might I add that blithely dispensing arrogant assertions does
*nothing*
to 'prove' those assertions to be true. You're only embarrassing yourself
by
asserting a claim that is *not* as evident as you make it out to be.
God is as readily evident as I make him out to be.
Right in front of you, everywhere you go.
When all is said and done, you will wonder why you were so blind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew W" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
05 Jan 2007 11:35:54 PM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu9erckhp7i95@corp.supernews.com...
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12pu968ldu9gie5@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu55qc6o61s30@corp.supernews.com...
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere you go,
right
directly in front of your face.
Really. How is it that I can point to the sun and you and I will both see
the same sun (unless you're blind), but when you point to 'God' I see
nothing?
And if you're going to say that the 'sun' is 'God' (in disguise) or
something along those lines, what are you going to say to person who
insists
that the 'sun' is the Greek sun-god 'Helios'? How are you going to
'prove'
your assertion is true and not his? (Or mine that the 'sun' is *not* a
'God'?)
And might I add that blithely dispensing arrogant assertions does
*nothing*
to 'prove' those assertions to be true. You're only embarrassing yourself
by
asserting a claim that is *not* as evident as you make it out to be.
God is as readily evident as I make him out to be.
Right in front of you, everywhere you go.
When all is said and done, you will wonder why you were so blind.
Don't just make nebulous references.
Be more specific!
--
Andrew W.
Jesus said that we must search everywhere for the truth.
How naive and foolish is the man who thinks he can get all the answers to
life from one convenient book.
What we are told God and Jesus said, they did not say.
http://www.divinelove.org/volume1/Mission.htm
TABLE OF CONTENTS. Must read!
http://www.divinelove.org/revnt/Rev-TOC-title.htm
The true Creator wants us to be happy and abundant.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Science_of_Getting_Rich
Audio version. http://website.lineone.net/~cornerstone/richaudio.htm
Think you know what ego is? Think again. The Bible is full of it!
http://www.fipdata.org/index.html
Religion Exposed!
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
06 Jan 2007 11:35:00 PM |
|
|
"Andrew W" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:459f353a$0$9771$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu9erckhp7i95@corp.supernews.com...
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12pu968ldu9gie5@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu55qc6o61s30@corp.supernews.com...
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere you
go,
right
directly in front of your face.
Really. How is it that I can point to the sun and you and I will both
see
the same sun (unless you're blind), but when you point to 'God' I see
nothing?
And if you're going to say that the 'sun' is 'God' (in disguise) or
something along those lines, what are you going to say to person who
insists
that the 'sun' is the Greek sun-god 'Helios'? How are you going to
'prove'
your assertion is true and not his? (Or mine that the 'sun' is *not* a
'God'?)
And might I add that blithely dispensing arrogant assertions does
*nothing*
to 'prove' those assertions to be true. You're only embarrassing
yourself
by
asserting a claim that is *not* as evident as you make it out to be.
God is as readily evident as I make him out to be.
Right in front of you, everywhere you go.
When all is said and done, you will wonder why you were so blind.
Don't just make nebulous references.
Be more specific!
How much more specific can I possibly be?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front of your
face.
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Then you are blind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
08 Jan 2007 11:48:35 AM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
How much more specific can I possibly be?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front of
your
face.
Prove it.
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Then you are blind.
What a load of *****.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
08 Jan 2007 11:46:53 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:48:35 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
How much more specific can I possibly be?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front of
your
face.
Prove it.
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Then you are blind.
What a load of *****.
As well as a personal lie.
They have no excuse for this kind of deliberate nastiness.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
08 Jan 2007 02:33:25 PM |
|
|
"Christopher A.Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:lq05q2d3k3712k55qguo7eok4htqierbkp@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:48:35 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
How much more specific can I possibly be?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front of
your
face.
Prove it.
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Then you are blind.
What a load of *****.
As well as a personal lie.
They have no excuse for this kind of deliberate nastiness.
Well, not to defend him, but I think he's insane ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
08 Jan 2007 03:55:10 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:46:53 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
- Refer: <lq05q2d3k3712k55qguo7eok4htqierbkp@4ax.com>
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:48:35 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
How much more specific can I possibly be?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front of
your
face.
Prove it.
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Then you are blind.
What a load of *****.
As well as a personal lie.
They have no excuse for this kind of deliberate nastiness.
He has the very plausible excuse of being outright clinically insane.
Seriously.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
10 Jan 2007 12:03:38 AM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12q11jvjn2a0kdc@corp.supernews.com...
"Andrew W" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:459f353a$0$9771$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu9erckhp7i95@corp.supernews.com...
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12pu968ldu9gie5@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu55qc6o61s30@corp.supernews.com...
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere you
go,
right
directly in front of your face.
Really. How is it that I can point to the sun and you and I will both
see
the same sun (unless you're blind), but when you point to 'God' I see
nothing?
And if you're going to say that the 'sun' is 'God' (in disguise) or
something along those lines, what are you going to say to person who
insists
that the 'sun' is the Greek sun-god 'Helios'? How are you going to
'prove'
your assertion is true and not his? (Or mine that the 'sun' is *not* a
'God'?)
And might I add that blithely dispensing arrogant assertions does
*nothing*
to 'prove' those assertions to be true. You're only embarrassing
yourself
by
asserting a claim that is *not* as evident as you make it out to be.
God is as readily evident as I make him out to be.
Right in front of you, everywhere you go.
When all is said and done, you will wonder why you were so blind.
Don't just make nebulous references.
Be more specific!
How much more specific can I possibly be?
How about to the point where we atheists can actually 'see' him. How about
to the point that it is reported on virtually every news channel in the
civlilized world?
Don't you find it strange that the 'discovery' of an undeniable 'God' has
never been reported by the 'Television' media. Not on CNN, MSNBC ... not
even on 'Fox News'. How do you explain this fact?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front of
your
face.
You're nuts. That's an out-and-out lie! If 'God' stood visibly in front of
me and *spoke* to me. I wouldn't be an atheist, would I?!! Dude, you are in
need of some serious 'de-programming'. You are telling me that I have seen
something *and* heard something -- or at least have *intimated* that --
without the slightest, *possible* proof that what you have asserted is true.
How *utterly* arrogant of you. How religiously deceived you are. How
religiously *diseased* you are. It's downright 'scary'!
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Hell *no*, I don't!!!
Then you are blind.
Funny. I can glimpse the sun in the morning. So can you. I have *never* seen
a 'God', more less have *heard* him speak. Account for that in a
'reasonable' way.
'Blind'? If you can 'see' this 'God' of yours, why don't you send me a
picture of him. If he speaks to you, send me audio proof of that.
I hate to appear to be 'picking' on you here, but you're talking 'crazy'.
And *that* just gives me the 'willies'!
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
10 Jan 2007 12:33:24 PM |
|
|
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12q90e588el3177@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12q11jvjn2a0kdc@corp.supernews.com...
"Andrew W" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:459f353a$0$9771$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu9erckhp7i95@corp.supernews.com...
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12pu968ldu9gie5@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu55qc6o61s30@corp.supernews.com...
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere you
go,
right
directly in front of your face.
Really. How is it that I can point to the sun and you and I will
both
see
the same sun (unless you're blind), but when you point to 'God' I
see
nothing?
And if you're going to say that the 'sun' is 'God' (in disguise) or
something along those lines, what are you going to say to person who
insists
that the 'sun' is the Greek sun-god 'Helios'? How are you going to
'prove'
your assertion is true and not his? (Or mine that the 'sun' is *not*
a
'God'?)
And might I add that blithely dispensing arrogant assertions does
*nothing*
to 'prove' those assertions to be true. You're only embarrassing
yourself
by
asserting a claim that is *not* as evident as you make it out to be.
God is as readily evident as I make him out to be.
Right in front of you, everywhere you go.
When all is said and done, you will wonder why you were so blind.
Don't just make nebulous references.
Be more specific!
How much more specific can I possibly be?
How about to the point where we atheists can actually 'see' him. How about
to the point that it is reported on virtually every news channel in the
civlilized world?
That will happen eventually, when the Almighty reveals himself.
Don't you find it strange that the 'discovery' of an undeniable 'God' has
never been reported by the 'Television' media. Not on CNN, MSNBC ... not
News reporters are blind too. Like atheists, they too are too stuck in the
physical to be able to see God.
even on 'Fox News'. How do you explain this fact?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front of
your
face.
You're nuts. That's an out-and-out lie! If 'God' stood visibly in front of
me and *spoke* to me. I wouldn't be an atheist, would I?!!
You would if you ignored all the cues that proved he was God.
And you might do that because you are comfortable in a non-supernatural
world where everything and everyone tragically ends in death.
Dude, you are in
need of some serious 'de-programming'. You are telling me that I have seen
something *and* heard something -- or at least have *intimated* that --
without the slightest, *possible* proof that what you have asserted is
true.
How *utterly* arrogant of you. How religiously deceived you are. How
religiously *diseased* you are. It's downright 'scary'!
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Hell *no*, I don't!!!
Then you are blind.
Funny. I can glimpse the sun in the morning. So can you. I have *never*
seen
a 'God', more less have *heard* him speak. Account for that in a
'reasonable' way.
You only see the surface of issues. An atheist's trademark.
If you get to know someone, and really get to know him, you just might find
God.
God could even be an atheist.
Strange, but it can happen.
In that case, he still believes in himself, he just converts everything into
what
atheists consider holy.
'Blind'? If you can 'see' this 'God' of yours, why don't you send me a
picture of him. If he speaks to you, send me audio proof of that.
I hate to appear to be 'picking' on you here, but you're talking 'crazy'.
And *that* just gives me the 'willies'!
That is the way discovery of God begins.
God is very strange.
BTW, atheists have a use in God's order.
Did you know that most religious consider death to be a good thing?
Atheists know better.
Without atheists, murder would probably be legal.
Atheists are specialists in the real world.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Greywolf" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
11 Jan 2007 01:29:15 AM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12qacbmb5u62i58@corp.supernews.com...
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12q90e588el3177@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12q11jvjn2a0kdc@corp.supernews.com...
"Andrew W" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:459f353a$0$9771$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu9erckhp7i95@corp.supernews.com...
"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12pu968ldu9gie5@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu55qc6o61s30@corp.supernews.com...
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere
you
go,
right
directly in front of your face.
Really. How is it that I can point to the sun and you and I will
both
see
the same sun (unless you're blind), but when you point to 'God' I
see
nothing?
And if you're going to say that the 'sun' is 'God' (in disguise) or
something along those lines, what are you going to say to person
who
insists
that the 'sun' is the Greek sun-god 'Helios'? How are you going to
'prove'
your assertion is true and not his? (Or mine that the 'sun' is
*not*
a
'God'?)
And might I add that blithely dispensing arrogant assertions does
*nothing*
to 'prove' those assertions to be true. You're only embarrassing
yourself
by
asserting a claim that is *not* as evident as you make it out to
be.
God is as readily evident as I make him out to be.
Right in front of you, everywhere you go.
When all is said and done, you will wonder why you were so blind.
Don't just make nebulous references.
Be more specific!
How much more specific can I possibly be?
How about to the point where we atheists can actually 'see' him. How
about
to the point that it is reported on virtually every news channel in the
civlilized world?
That will happen eventually, when the Almighty reveals himself.
So! You admit that there is no material evidence of the 'Almighty'; that you
only *believe* this creature will make its presence known somwhere off in
the future.
But that doesn't explain why you all insist he exists when you all have
absolutely no irrefutable evidence to support such an outlandish claim.
Don't you find it strange that the 'discovery' of an undeniable 'God' has
never been reported by the 'Television' media. Not on CNN, MSNBC ... not
News reporters are blind too. Like atheists, they too are too stuck in
the
physical to be able to see God.
Ugghhh! And *you* can? If *you* can detect a 'God', why is it that the
scientific community cannot? What detection gear do you possess that we
unbelievers do not?
even on 'Fox News'. How do you explain this fact?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front of
your
face.
You're nuts. That's an out-and-out lie! If 'God' stood visibly in front
of
me and *spoke* to me. I wouldn't be an atheist, would I?!!
You would if you ignored all the cues that proved he was God.
What a brash and irresponsible statement to make. You have NO idea to what
lengths I have gone to in order to discover a real 'God'. Saying there is
one and absolutely refusing to admit to the possibiltiy that there isn't
does no one any good. You are deluding yourself. You are exibiting signs of
severe brainwashing -- or *something* of that nature. Look all around you.
Where in the hell do you see a 'God'? I'm trying to be as open-minded as I
could possibly be in regards to all this -- which you are most definitely
*not*!
And you might do that because you are comfortable in a non-supernatural
world where everything and everyone tragically ends in death.
And you're telling me that you live in a supernatural world? Do you have
*any* idea how ridiculous that sounds? And not a *shred* of proof to back it
up, either. Sad. Very sad.
Dude, you are in
need of some serious 'de-programming'. You are telling me that I have
seen
something *and* heard something -- or at least have *intimated* that --
without the slightest, *possible* proof that what you have asserted is
true.
How *utterly* arrogant of you. How religiously deceived you are. How
religiously *diseased* you are. It's downright 'scary'!
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Hell *no*, I don't!!!
Then you are blind.
Funny. I can glimpse the sun in the morning. So can you. I have *never*
seen
a 'God', more less have *heard* him speak. Account for that in a
'reasonable' way.
You only see the surface of issues. An atheist's trademark.
If you get to know someone, and really get to know him, you just might
find
God.
Bahhhhloooney! You cannot tell me what I see or don't see. You just want
people to share your views and don't care how 'true' they are or aren't.
God could even be an atheist.
Now why on earth would a 'God' not believe he, himself, exists but would
turn around and sentence you to a life of eternal torment for not believing
in him. Don't you see how irrational all this is?
Strange, but it can happen.
In that case, he still believes in himself, he just converts everything
into
what
atheists consider holy.
<sigh>
'Blind'? If you can 'see' this 'God' of yours, why don't you send me a
picture of him. If he speaks to you, send me audio proof of that.
I hate to appear to be 'picking' on you here, but you're talking 'crazy'.
And *that* just gives me the 'willies'!
That is the way discovery of God begins.
God is very strange.
BTW, atheists have a use in God's order.
Did you know that most religious consider death to be a good thing?
Atheists know better.
Without atheists, murder would probably be legal.
Atheists are specialists in the real world.
<Just shaking his head>
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
11 Jan 2007 12:45:09 PM |
|
|
"Grey" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12qbpr47rbpeecd@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12qacbmb5u62i58@corp.supernews.com...
"Grey" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12q90e588el3177@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12q11jvjn2a0kdc@corp.supernews.com...
"Andrew WE" <removethis_ajwerner@optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:459f353a$0$9771$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu9erckhp7i95@corp.supernews.com...
"Grey" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12pu968ldu9gie5@corp.supernews.com...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12pu55qc6o61s30@corp.supernews.com...
If you can't see God, you are quite blind, as he is everywhere
you
go,
right
directly in front of your face.
Really. How is it that I can point to the sun and you and I will
both
see
the same sun (unless you're blind), but when you point to 'God' I
see
nothing?
And if you're going to say that the 'sun' is 'God' (in disguise)
or
something along those lines, what are you going to say to person
who
insists
that the 'sun' is the Greek sun-god 'Helios'? How are you going
to
'prove'
your assertion is true and not his? (Or mine that the 'sun' is
*not*
a
'God'?)
And might I add that blithely dispensing arrogant assertions does
*nothing*
to 'prove' those assertions to be true. You're only embarrassing
yourself
by
asserting a claim that is *not* as evident as you make it out to
be.
God is as readily evident as I make him out to be.
Right in front of you, everywhere you go.
When all is said and done, you will wonder why you were so blind.
Don't just make nebulous references.
Be more specific!
How much more specific can I possibly be?
How about to the point where we atheists can actually 'see' him. How
about
to the point that it is reported on virtually every news channel in the
civilized world?
That will happen eventually, when the Almighty reveals himself.
So! You admit that there is no material evidence of the 'Almighty'; that
you
only *believe* this creature will make its presence known somewhere off in
the future.
The Almighty is already here. He has been here since Adam.
He just hasn't revealed himself yet.
But that doesn't explain why you all insist he exists when you all have
absolutely no irrefutable evidence to support such an outlandish claim.
I've seen him, I've touched him, I've talked to him, I've befriended him,
I've invited him into my home, I've gone on long hikes with him...
....what more does it take?
Don't you find it strange that the 'discovery' of an undeniable 'God'
has
never been reported by the 'Television' media. Not on CNN, MSNBC ...
not
News reporters are blind too. Like atheists, they too are too stuck in
the
physical to be able to see God.
Ought! And *you* can? If *you* can detect a 'God', why is it that the
scientific community cannot? What detection gear do you possess that we
unbelievers do not?
A pure heart.
That is all it takes.
A pure heart is when you release everything that the conformists have taught
you, and release real knowledge unto yourself.
even on 'Fox News'. How do you explain this fact?
Many times in your life, God is visibly, audibly, directly in front
of
your
face.
You're nuts. That's an out-and-out lie! If 'God' stood visibly in front
of
me and *spoke* to me. I wouldn't be an atheist, would I?!!
You would if you ignored all the cues that proved he was God.
What a brash and irresponsible statement to make. You have NO idea to what
lengths I have gone to in order to discover a real 'God'.
God has to crystallize within your mind and heart as you look at him.
Saying there is
one and absolutely refusing to admit to the possibiltiy that there isn't
does no one any good. You are deluding yourself. You are exibiting signs
of
severe brainwashing -- or *something* of that nature.
No one has brainwashed me. I stay away from the intensely religious.
Look all around you.
Where in the hell do you see a 'God'?
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical, but I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN OBJECTIVELY...see the
Almighty everywhere I go.
But rest easy, he has to reveal himself to the waiting heart.
I'm trying to be as open-minded as I
could possibly be in regards to all this -- which you are most definitely
*not*!
Once you know something certain doors close.
And you might do that because you are comfortable in a non-supernatural
world where everything and everyone tragically ends in death.
And you're telling me that you live in a supernatural world?
Yes, I live in a very and most supernatural world, complete with miracles,
manifestations of God, angels, saints, and all kinds of magical beings.
Do you have
*any* idea how ridiculous that sounds?
The spiritual world always sounds ridiculous to the natural mind.
God designed it that way so that knowledge would be a gift.
And not a *shred* of proof to back it
up, either. Sad. Very sad.
Dude, you are in
need of some serious 'de-programming'. You are telling me that I have
seen
something *and* heard something -- or at least have *intimated* that --
without the slightest, *possible* proof that what you have asserted is
true.
How *utterly* arrogant of you. How religiously deceived you are. How
religiously *diseased* you are. It's downright 'scary'!
To recognize him is to see him.
Can't see him?
Hell *no*, I don't!!!
Then you are blind.
Funny. I can glimpse the sun in the morning. So can you. I have *never*
seen
a 'God', more less have *heard* him speak. Account for that in a
'reasonable' way.
You only see the surface of issues. An atheist's trademark.
If you get to know someone, and really get to know him, you just might
find
God.
Bahhhhloooney! You cannot tell me what I see or don't see. You just want
people to share your views and don't care how 'true' they are or aren't.
God is there, in our numbers.
God could even be an atheist.
Now why on earth would a 'God' not believe he, himself, exists but would
turn around and sentence you to a life of eternal torment for not
believing
in him. Don't you see how irrational all this is?
That is what the religious told you. But the reason Jesus came was to save
the world, and he in fact did.
Strange, but it can happen.
In that case, he still believes in himself, he just converts everything
into
what
atheists consider holy.
<sigh>
'Blind'? If you can 'see' this 'God' of yours, why don't you send me a
picture of him. If he speaks to you, send me audio proof of that.
I hate to appear to be 'picking' on you here, but you're talking
'crazy'.
And *that* just gives me the 'willies'!
That is the way discovery of God begins.
God is very strange.
BTW, atheists have a use in God's order.
Did you know that most religious consider death to be a good thing?
Atheists know better.
Without atheists, murder would probably be legal.
Atheists are specialists in the real world.
<Just shaking his head>
Greywolf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
11 Jan 2007 01:44:45 PM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical, but I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN OBJECTIVELY...see
the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
11 Jan 2007 02:55:28 PM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical, but
I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN OBJECTIVELY...see
the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you, and then you throw eggs.
See? You don't want tangible proof. You wouldn't know tangible proof if it
bit you like a snake.
This is just a game you play.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
11 Jan 2007 11:42:55 PM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> writes:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical, but
I am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN OBJECTIVELY...see
the Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you, and then you throw eggs.
See? You don't want tangible proof. You wouldn't know tangible proof if it
bit you like a snake.
You're not giving tangible proof. You're just claiming to have it. If you're
so sure of that, put up the tangible evidence to back up your ravings.
This is just a game you play.
You don't even know what you think, so kindly quit presuming you know what
others think. (Or, you can FOAD. Hey, it's *your* choice.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Houston 4, San Antonio 1 (January 7)
NEXT GAME: Friday, January 12 at Iowa, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
11 Jan 2007 03:52:21 PM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12qd9209n49hv3f@corp.supernews.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical,
but
I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN OBJECTIVELY...see
the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you,
Um, no, you didn't. What you offered is conjecture and wishful thinking.
Deal.
and then you throw eggs.
I would never waste eggs in such a fashion. Why, the very idea!
See? You don't want tangible proof. You wouldn't know tangible proof if
it
bit you like a snake.
And you're so full of ***** your eyes are turning brown if you actually think
your mere opinion equals "tangible proof". That's pathetic.
This is just a game you play.
You're obviously delusional. Get help.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
11 Jan 2007 03:51:17 PM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50npj9F1gio9lU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12qd9209n49hv3f@corp.supernews.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical,
but
I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN
OBJECTIVELY...see
the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you,
Um, no, you didn't. What you offered is conjecture and wishful thinking.
Deal.
and then you throw eggs.
I would never waste eggs in such a fashion. Why, the very idea!
See? You don't want tangible proof. You wouldn't know tangible proof
if
it
bit you like a snake.
And you're so full of ***** your eyes are turning brown if you actually
think
your mere opinion equals "tangible proof". That's pathetic.
It wasn't an opinion.
It was a visual illustration.
Go put that one in your pipe and smoke it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
12 Jan 2007 04:57:11 AM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12qdcalaipoteee@corp.supernews.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50npj9F1gio9lU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12qd9209n49hv3f@corp.supernews.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical,
but
I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN
OBJECTIVELY...see
the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you,
Um, no, you didn't. What you offered is conjecture and wishful thinking.
Deal.
and then you throw eggs.
I would never waste eggs in such a fashion. Why, the very idea!
See? You don't want tangible proof. You wouldn't know tangible proof
if
it
bit you like a snake.
And you're so full of ***** your eyes are turning brown if you actually
think
your mere opinion equals "tangible proof". That's pathetic.
It wasn't an opinion.
Wrong
It was a visual illustration.
Wrong. It's some crazy ***** you made up.
Go put that one in your pipe and smoke it.
Don't smoke. You? And is it legal? I doubt it.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
13 Jan 2007 06:28:06 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:55:28 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical, but I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN OBJECTIVELY...see the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you
I guess all us merely sane people missed the "proof" you posted. What,
other than your assertions that you see God, did you post?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
13 Jan 2007 07:20:54 PM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:i6uiq2tvfj4r6bcr2ns9rjbm2vupnhqo3u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:55:28 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical,
but I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN
OBJECTIVELY...see the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you
I guess all us merely sane people missed the "proof" you posted. What,
other than your assertions that you see God, did you post?
O.K. Here is the tangible proof of the existence of God:
Meet new people.
One out of five of them, men, women, and children, young and old, if I am
correct, will be manifestations of Almighty God.
How will you know?
When you get to know them, if you are truly trying to test this little
theory,
they will drop little clues as to their nature.
Eventually they may even do miracles for you. Subtle ones, usually, and
often mere knowledge miracles, but
when you examine them, you will know that they are miracles.
Their words themselves, the way they light up reality to and for you, will
just let you know...that God exists.
And that is my proof that God exists.
Of course the proof is no good to you unless you properly and sufficiently
examine the evidence.
But there it is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
15 Jan 2007 09:14:48 AM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
O.K. Here is the tangible proof of the existence of God:
Meet new people.
One out of five of them, men, women, and children, young and old, if I am
correct, will be manifestations of Almighty God.
Based on what objective, verifiable evidence? Your opinion and/or
unsupported assertions don't count.
How will you know?
When you get to know them, if you are truly trying to test this little
theory,
they will drop little clues as to their nature.
Eventually they may even do miracles for you. Subtle ones, usually, and
often mere knowledge miracles, but
when you examine them, you will know that they are miracles.
Their words themselves, the way they light up reality to and for you, will
just let you know...that God exists.
And that is my proof that God exists.
Which is some ***** you made up. No thanks.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
13 Jan 2007 11:24:09 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:20:54 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:i6uiq2tvfj4r6bcr2ns9rjbm2vupnhqo3u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:55:28 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being metaphysical,
but I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN
OBJECTIVELY...see the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you
I guess all us merely sane people missed the "proof" you posted. What,
other than your assertions that you see God, did you post?
O.K. Here is the tangible proof of the existence of God:
Meet new people.
One out of five of them, men, women, and children, young and old, if I am
correct, will be manifestations of Almighty God.
And if you're not correct they won't be.
How will you know?
When you get to know them, if you are truly trying to test this little
theory, they will drop little clues as to their nature.
Again, where's the OBJECTIVE evidence? Your assertion is merely your
assertion, not evidence of any sort.
And that is my proof that God exists.
That's your assertion, not evidence.
Of course the proof is no good to you unless you properly and sufficiently
examine the evidence.
If you post some I'll examine it.
But there it is.
There WHAT is? All you did was make assertions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
14 Jan 2007 10:52:43 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:offjq2tj3h2inhg1bepil7mmqafal4tban@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:20:54 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:i6uiq2tvfj4r6bcr2ns9rjbm2vupnhqo3u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:55:28 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
snip
Everywhere I go. And I know you think I am just being
metaphysical,
but I
am not. I LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, TANGIBLY, YES, EVEN
OBJECTIVELY...see the
Almighty everywhere I go.
Yeah, but you're apparently mentally ill.
You ask for tangible proof, and I give it to you
I guess all us merely sane people missed the "proof" you posted. What,
other than your assertions that you see God, did you post?
O.K. Here is the tangible proof of the existence of God:
Meet new people.
One out of five of them, men, women, and children, young and old, if I am
correct, will be manifestations of Almighty God.
And if you're not correct they won't be.
How will you know?
When you get to know them, if you are truly trying to test this little
theory, they will drop little clues as to their nature.
Again, where's the OBJECTIVE evidence? Your assertion is merely your
assertion, not evidence of any sort.
Can't you read? I just implied that the little clues are the objective
evidence.
And that is my proof that God exists.
That's your assertion, not evidence.
No, that is proof, and tangible proof. You can't get more tangible than a
God you can physically touch.
You just refuse to examine the evidence.
Of course the proof is no good to you unless you properly and
sufficiently
examine the evidence.
If you post some I'll examine it.
I did.
But you still have to go out into the world to look, to see if God is
physically there.
But there it is.
There WHAT is? All you did was make assertions.
No, I told you EXACTLY where to look.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
14 Jan 2007 03:56:08 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:52:43 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:offjq2tj3h2inhg1bepil7mmqafal4tban@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:20:54 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:i6uiq2tvfj4r6bcr2ns9rjbm2vupnhqo3u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:55:28 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
Again, where's the OBJECTIVE evidence? Your assertion is merely your
assertion, not evidence of any sort.
Can't you read? I just implied that the little clues are the objective
evidence.
It's YOUR ASSERTION that the clues are objective evidence. They
aren't. In order to post objective evidence, maybe you should learn
the difference between objective and subjective. The kind of clues
you're talking about exist only in someone's mind, making them
SUBjective, not OBjective. When I look at a person I don't see the
"clues" you imagine you see - that's not objective.
And that is my proof that God exists.
That's your assertion, not evidence.
No, that is proof, and tangible proof.
You assertion isn't tangible, it's not evidence and it's not proof -
it's just your assertion.
You can't get more tangible than a God you can physically touch.
Tell me the name of the person you claim is God, where - precisely - I
can find him, and when, and how I can tell - OBJECTIVELY - that he's
not just another person, but the creator of the universe, and post his
picture someplace I can look at it so I'll know him when I see him.
You just refuse to examine the evidence.
You haven't posted objective evidence yet, you've just made
assertions. Now post the evidence I've just asked you for or admit
that you're just making things up.
Of course the proof is no good to you unless you properly and sufficiently
examine the evidence.
If you post some I'll examine it.
I did.
Again, your assertions aren't evidence. If you claim that there's a
god that looks like a man, I already told you, right up above, what
you have to post to provide evidence that your claim is true.
But you still have to go out into the world to look, to see if God is
physically there.
Nope - objective existence doesn't require me to do anything -
something that objectively exists objectively exists, whether I exist
or not makes no difference.
But there it is.
There WHAT is? All you did was make assertions.
No, I told you EXACTLY where to look.
Street address and time, the name he goes under, a complete
description including photograph, and the method of determining that
he's not just a person. Otherwise it's just your assertion and it's
worthless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
14 Jan 2007 07:22:00 PM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:en8lq212vt7r70130865b0eb4m0024kfsh@4ax.com...
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:52:43 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:offjq2tj3h2inhg1bepil7mmqafal4tban@4ax.com...
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:20:54 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:i6uiq2tvfj4r6bcr2ns9rjbm2vupnhqo3u@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:55:28 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:50ni41F1grqsdU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com>
Again, where's the OBJECTIVE evidence? Your assertion is merely your
assertion, not evidence of any sort.
Can't you read? I just implied that the little clues are the objective
evidence.
It's YOUR ASSERTION that the clues are objective evidence. They
aren't. In order to post objective evidence, maybe you should learn
the difference between objective and subjective. The kind of clues
you're talking about exist only in someone's mind, making them
SUBjective, not OBjective. When I look at a person I don't see the
"clues" you imagine you see - that's not objective.
And that is my proof that God exists.
That's your assertion, not evidence.
No, that is proof, and tangible proof.
You assertion isn't tangible, it's not evidence and it's not proof -
it's just your assertion.
You can't get more tangible than a God you can physically touch.
Tell me the name of the person you claim is God, where - precisely - I
can find him, and when, and how I can tell - OBJECTIVELY - that he's
not just another person, but the creator of the universe, and post his
picture someplace I can look at it so I'll know him when I see him.
I don't live where you do. How would I know the names of the dozens of
manifestations of God in your immediate vicinity and grasp?
You cannot truthfully say you know that there is no God if you will not even
put forth the effort to check out whether or not he is there.
You just refuse to examine the evidence.
You haven't posted objective evidence yet, you've just made
assertions. Now post the evidence I've just asked you for or admit
that you're just making things up.
Of course the proof is no good to you unless you properly and
sufficiently
examine the evidence.
If you post some I'll examine it.
I did.
Again, your assertions aren't evidence. If you claim that there's a
god that looks like a man, I already told you, right up above, what
you have to post to provide evidence that your claim is true.
But you still have to go out into the world to look, to see if God is
physically there.
Nope - objective existence doesn't require me to do anything -
something that objectively exists objectively exists, whether I exist
or not makes no difference.
In a court, the jury is required to examine the evidence.
You are required, if you wish to know reality, to do the very same thing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
15 Jan 2007 09:17:26 AM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
You cannot truthfully say you know that there is no God if you will not
even
put forth the effort to check out whether or not he is there.
You cannot truthfully say you know that there are no Leprechauns if you will
not even put forth the effort to check out whether or not they are there.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Earnest" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
15 Jan 2007 08:19:54 PM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:511juoF1hs5hhU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
You cannot truthfully say you know that there is no God if you will not
even
put forth the effort to check out whether or not he is there.
You cannot truthfully say you know that there are no Leprechauns if you
will
not even put forth the effort to check out whether or not they are there.
God is easy to find, Leprechauns are not so easy.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
16 Jan 2007 08:34:53 AM |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12qodi4k8fvn265@corp.supernews.com...
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:511juoF1hs5hhU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
You cannot truthfully say you know that there is no God if you will not
even
put forth the effort to check out whether or not he is there.
You cannot truthfully say you know that there are no Leprechauns if you
will
not even put forth the effort to check out whether or not they are there.
God is easy to find, Leprechauns are not so easy.
Whatever. If Hoss Cartwright shows up at my door, I'll be sure to let you
know.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Father Haskell" |
|
| Title: Re: GOD EVODENCE |
16 Jan 2007 08:34:34 PM |
|
|
Mark Earnest wrote:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:511juoF1hs5hhU1@mid.individual.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in
snip
You cannot truthfully say you know that there is no God if you will not
even
put forth the effort to check out whether or not he is there.
You cannot truthfully say you know that there are no Leprechauns if you
will
not even put forth the effort to check out whether or not they are there.
God is easy to find, Leprechauns are not so easy.
Just call the Wonka factory, and one will answer.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|