| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Disciple Gaius" |
| Date: |
01 Apr 2007 09:03:24 PM |
| Object: |
Help with the bible difficulties |
"Is there a thing of which it is said, 'See, this is new'? It has
already been, in the ages before us." Ecclesiastes 1:10 NRSV
That surely applies to the supposed contradictions and problems in the
bible. Today's skeptics are only recycling old objections answered
over and over in centuries past. Here are several online sites with
many answers to the difficulties even honest inquirers may bring up.
http://www.carm.org/bible_difficulties.htm
http://www.christian-thinktank.com/
http://www.tektonics.org/
http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/bible.htm#INDEX
http://www.rationalchristianity.net/apol_index.html
THE BIBLE
"It has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without
any mixture of error, for its matter: it is all pure, all sincere,
nothing too much, nothing wanting." John Locke
Gaius
.
|
|
| User: "Phlogeus" |
|
| Title: Re: Help with the bible difficulties |
01 Apr 2007 10:13:47 PM |
|
|
In article <4610643d.11759669@news.east.cox.net>, wrote:
"Is there a thing of which it is said, 'See, this is new'? It has
already been, in the ages before us." Ecclesiastes 1:10 NRSV
That surely applies to the supposed contradictions and problems in the
bible. Today's skeptics are only recycling old objections answered
over and over in centuries past.
The answer until recently was generally burning at the stake
The only true answer is - yes taken as a single book the Bible contradicts
itself
But then it isn't history - its theology
and often lousy theology at that
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Help with the bible difficulties |
01 Apr 2007 11:50:07 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:13:47 +1000, (Phlogeus)
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
In article <4610643d.11759669@news.east.cox.net>, wrote:
"Is there a thing of which it is said, 'See, this is new'? It has
already been, in the ages before us." Ecclesiastes 1:10 NRSV
That surely applies to the supposed contradictions and problems in the
bible. Today's skeptics are only recycling old objections answered
over and over in centuries past.
The answer until recently was generally burning at the stake
The only true answer is - yes taken as a single book the Bible contradicts
itself
An interesting comment from someone who undoubtedly has never read the
Bible cover-to-cover even the first time.
So you are pretending to review a book you have never read!
m m m
john w
But then it isn't history - its theology
and often lousy theology at that
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phlogeus" |
|
| Title: Re: Help with the bible difficulties |
02 Apr 2007 02:41:01 AM |
|
|
In article <np2113dp53pu4kbiu7g6dgnq7684icdbv8@4ax.com>, john w
<johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
An interesting comment from someone who undoubtedly has never read the
Bible cover-to-cover even the first time.
Sorry to break it to you Johhny but the pop up version Black Momma gave
you isn't the real thing
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Help with the bible difficulties |
03 Apr 2007 05:19:10 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:41:01 +1000, (Phlogeus)
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
In article <np2113dp53pu4kbiu7g6dgnq7684icdbv8@4ax.com>, john w
<johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
An interesting comment from someone who undoubtedly has never read the
Bible cover-to-cover even the first time.
Sorry to break it to you Johhny but the pop up version Black Momma gave
you isn't the real thing
There you go, demoniac! When you have no REAL answer to a valid
point (the point that you have never read the Bible you so HATE)
You simply drop back and
change the subject, and insult people!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "walksalone" |
|
| Title: Re: Help with the bible difficulties |
02 Apr 2007 07:43:11 AM |
|
|
john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:np2113dp53pu4kbiu7g6dgnq7684icdbv8@4ax.com decided to see if he can
convince himself that others share his lack of skills in reading and
comprehension. He probably managed to do just that, and as usual, is
totally in error.
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:13:47 +1000, (Phlogeus)
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
In article <4610643d.11759669@news.east.cox.net>,
wrote:
"Is there a thing of which it is said, 'See, this is new'? It has
already been, in the ages before us." Ecclesiastes 1:10 NRSV
That surely applies to the supposed contradictions and problems in
the bible. Today's skeptics are only recycling old objections
answered over and over in centuries past.
The answer until recently was generally burning at the stake
The only true answer is - yes taken as a single book the Bible
contradicts itself
An interesting comment from someone who undoubtedly has never read the
Bible cover-to-cover even the first time.
Not everyone is restricted to a book that comes with its own box of
crayons. The majority of people can read at the collegiate level and
your assumption that somebody else has not read your grimorie is strictly
that. Your assumption.
So you are pretending to review a book you have never read!
How do you know, is not as if you have much knowledge about you
mythology, or can do much more than quote mine. You can not even discuss
the theological implications of the passengers. You quote, nor can you
discuss who the audience was supposed to be. You know, less than nothing
about the history and formulation of your mythology. Yet, you pretend to
be a font of knowledge, when you cannot even discuss it.
m m m
You need to do something about that constipation, maybe if you quit using
the Ex-Lax for make up? You certainly are not going to fool anybody into
thinking you are contemplating. There is a skill you have demonstrated
no familiarity with.
john w
which wannabe this time Johnny, the one who can only pretend that others
have his shortcomings, as well as his self-imposed limitations? or maybe
you are trying to play in the part of a college professor, even though
you're paid up with the dumbass.
Walksalone, who would not associate or insult a mental midget with the
likes of Johnny, they are so far above him is to give new meaning to the
phrase, paralyzed from the eyebrows up. Now if they could just do that,
would his vocal cords and his fingertip, the one he types with.
The trace of the hand will live, but not the hand that made it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
