If there is a Hell



 Religions > Bible > If there is a Hell

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 8 of 15

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "J Young"
Date: 27 Feb 2005 09:26:55 PM
Object: If there is a Hell
If Hell, as described in the Bible, really does exist; No one should be
suprised at who will be roasting and who won't. You know who you are.
This alone should motivate people to lead a moral, clean, decent life.
Just in case.
.

User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 04 Mar 2005 05:10:56 PM
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.04.22.36.58.305292@postini.spamcon.org...

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:46:55 +0000, "Sir Marksman" <895@5454546654.com>
wrote in message news:<z22Wd.64797$nC5.36583@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:


"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message

Hey scumbag, have you decided to quit your ANTAGONIZING?

Did you finally get the message that I am not interested in your
homosexual advances?

Did you decide to start ANTAGONIZING KKKurt Lochner again?

You have already found out that I will NEVER allow an ANTAGONIST like
you to win.

Cheers ANTAGONIST!

Reply and admit you are an ANTAGONIST.


Sorry, Gerry <gerrymcg@maine.rr.com>, but I still won't date you. I hate
to disappoint you like that, but you are acting like a lovesick puppy. I
mean, come on, what would your boyfriend think? Or do you and he have an
"understanding"?

Thanks for admitting you are an ANTAGONIST!
.
User: "Bill Baker"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 04 Mar 2005 05:15:53 PM
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:10:56 +0000, "Sir Marksman" <895@5454546654.com>
wrote in message news:<4W5Wd.70824$H05.56309@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:


"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.04.22.36.58.305292@postini.spamcon.org...

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:46:55 +0000, "Sir Marksman" <895@5454546654.com>
wrote in message news:<z22Wd.64797$nC5.36583@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:


"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message

Hey scumbag, have you decided to quit your ANTAGONIZING?

Did you finally get the message that I am not interested in your
homosexual advances?

Did you decide to start ANTAGONIZING KKKurt Lochner again?

You have already found out that I will NEVER allow an ANTAGONIST like
you to win.

Cheers ANTAGONIST!

Reply and admit you are an ANTAGONIST.


Sorry, Gerry <gerrymcg@maine.rr.com>, but I still won't date you. I hate
to disappoint you like that, but you are acting like a lovesick puppy. I
mean, come on, what would your boyfriend think? Or do you and he have an
"understanding"?

Reply and admit that you're in love with me.


Thanks for admitting you are an ANTAGONIST!

Thanks for admitting you are in love with me.
--
Funny Lurlean quote #45:
"I do have cousins name of Gurlean and Shirlean plus aunty's name of Earlene
and Myrlene." -- Lurlean's family is the personification of the joke, "If your
family tree does not fork, you might be a redneck."
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 04 Mar 2005 05:16:35 PM
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
Hey scumbag, have you decided to quit your ANTAGONIZING?
Did you finally get the message that I am not interested in your homosexual
advances?
Did you decide to start ANTAGONIZING KKKurt Lochner again?
You have already found out that I will NEVER allow an ANTAGONIST like you to
win.
Cheers ANTAGONIST!
Reply and admit you are an ANTAGONIST.
.
User: "Bill Baker"

Title: Re: sir marKKKsman admits he is a gay troll 04 Mar 2005 05:30:18 PM
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:16:35 +0000, "Sir Marksman" <895@5454546654.com>
wrote in message news:<n%5Wd.70871$H05.66740@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:

"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message

Hey scumbag, have you decided to quit your ANTAGONIZING?

Did you finally get the message that I am not interested in your
homosexual advances?

Did you decide to start ANTAGONIZING KKKurt Lochner again?

You have already found out that I will NEVER allow an ANTAGONIST like
you to win.

Cheers ANTAGONIST!

Reply and admit you are an ANTAGONIST.

Sorry, Gerry <gerrymcg@maine.rr.com>, but I still won't date you. I hate
to disappoint you like that, but you are acting like a lovesick puppy. I
mean, come on, what would your boyfriend think? Or do you and he have an
"understanding"?
P.S. Why don't you go back to stalking Kurt Lochner?
Reply and admit you are in love with me.
--
Funny Lurlean quote #2:
"I've seen Shakespeare in heaven. He prefers the company of Southerners on
account of we speak the same language."
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: billy bob baKKKer aka Max Varaszlo admits he is a gay troll 04 Mar 2005 05:31:30 PM
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
Hey scumbag, have you decided to quit your ANTAGONIZING?
Did you finally get the message that I am not interested in your homosexual
advances?
Did you decide to start ANTAGONIZING KKKurt Lochner again?
You have already found out that I will NEVER allow an ANTAGONIST like you to
win.
Cheers ANTAGONIST!
Reply and admit you are an ANTAGONIST.
.
User: "Bill Baker"

Title: Re: sir marKKKsman aka Gerry admits he is a gay troll 04 Mar 2005 05:36:14 PM
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:31:30 +0000, "Sir Marksman" <895@5454546654.com>
wrote in message news:<md6Wd.70977$H05.69827@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:

"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message

Hey scumbag, have you decided to quit your ANTAGONIZING?

Did you finally get the message that I am not interested in your homosexual
advances?

Did you decide to start ANTAGONIZING KKKurt Lochner again?

You have already found out that I will NEVER allow an ANTAGONIST like you to
win.

Cheers ANTAGONIST!

Reply and admit you are an ANTAGONIST.

Haha, u r teh ghey.
--
Thurgood Lie #2:
"Most homosexuals fantasize about children."
news:1107585362.333321.111210@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
news:1108018234.267337.155670@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
.
User: "Sir Marksman"

Title: Re: billy bob baKKKer aka Max Varazslo admits he is a gay troll 08 Mar 2005 05:32:35 AM
"Max Varazslo posting as Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>
wrote in message

Yes, I am a perverted *****.

We know.
.
User: "Bill Baker"

Title: Re: sir marKKKsman aka Gerry admits he is a gay troll 08 Mar 2005 06:53:41 AM
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:32:35 +0000, "Sir Marksman" <895@5454546654.com>
wrote in message news:<n3gXd.78235$H05.72233@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:

"Max Varazslo posting as Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>
wrote in message

Yes, I am a perverted *****.


We know.

*smooch*
--
Lurlean Lie #9:
Sodomy is more important to you than anything else.
news:7908c278.0311091020.3d97495b@posting.google.com
.








User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 04 Mar 2005 04:07:18 AM
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:51:48 -0500, "RS" <rswarts@bu.edu> wrote:


"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:4222E8A2.E3146FBB@netvigator.com...

The primitives that made the story up made it for people of their own
simple
logic, so they ignored the first twenty years of the man's life.

"The son of a god lives for twenty years with nothing, but nothing,
recorded
about his most important and formative years".

With this kind of lunacy no wonder the ranks of atheism grow


Documents ranging from 50AD to 100AD spanning different communities dictate
the existence of Jesus of Nazareth . The religious-scholastic world hardly
disputes that through multiple attestation, he was a real person.

"Is not this the son of Mary and Joseph, the carpenter?"
Jesus wasn't well known because he wasn't meant to be at that time in His
life. It was the moment of His baptism when His mission began, and before
that it was His objective to live life and experience what we experience, to
be prepared for the trial that was to be placed before Him.

As per your last comment: "No wonder the ranks of atheism grow". We have a
perfectly good explaination for the growth of atheism. You most likely have
heart it, but it is a demon in our world meant to distract from the truth of
God. The Enemy wants nothing more than to gain souls for darkness and to
take away from God, though His efforts are futile and miniscule in the name
of Christ.

Odd that the faithful should equate logic and reason with darkness.


-RS

.
User: "Susan Cohen"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 06 Mar 2005 12:51:07 AM
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:b1dg21pcecdbkusd79i9mir60h4kq2l7r5@4ax.com...

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:51:48 -0500, "RS" <rswarts@bu.edu> wrote:

[snip missionizing]


Odd that the faithful should equate logic and reason with darkness.

Because in his case logic & reason negate most of what he believes.
There is no historical evidence for the existence of Jesus, and it drives
them nuts.
Susan



-RS


.
User: "bam"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 06 Mar 2005 06:24:14 AM
"Susan Cohen" <flavia13@verizon.net> wrote

There is no historical evidence for the existence of Jesus, and it drives
them nuts.

Susan

That argument is so worthless, you should pay the audience for the waste of
time.
BAM
.
User: "NotBetterThanYou"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 07 Mar 2005 06:32:26 PM
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in message
news:eBCWd.3361$c72.406@bignews3.bellsouth.net...


"Susan Cohen" <flavia13@verizon.net> wrote


There is no historical evidence for the existence of Jesus, and it drives
them nuts.

Susan


That argument is so worthless, you should pay the audience for the waste
of time.

BAM

If only that were true. You see BAM your belief system is founded on nothing
but hype and myth. To this day it struggles to survive because educated
people continue to reject the things that were swallowed up by the ignorant
of the past. You are a relic.
NBTY
.
User: "TDP"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 07 Mar 2005 08:23:52 PM
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:32:26 -0500, "NotBetterThanYou"
<notbty@home.net> wrote:

To this day it struggles to survive because educated
people continue to reject the things that were swallowed up by the ignorant
of the past. You are a relic.

It doesn't struggle at all, it's alive and well with a billion plus.
It's not because you're better educated but that you play the role of
God. See it all the time. Self interpreters. You guys even know
where you're headed. Self procliamed Gods not better educated.


NBTY

.
User: "thomas p"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 08 Mar 2005 12:50:57 PM
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 02:23:52 GMT, TDP <tparsons10@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:32:26 -0500, "NotBetterThanYou"
<notbty@home.net> wrote:

To this day it struggles to survive because educated
people continue to reject the things that were swallowed up by the ignorant
of the past. You are a relic.


It doesn't struggle at all, it's alive and well with a billion plus.

It's not because you're better educated but that you play the role of
God. See it all the time. Self interpreters. You guys even know
where you're headed. Self procliamed Gods not better educated.

That must be it. It is only a coincidence that those areas of the
world with the lowest level of education and development are the ones
with the highest number of persons active in religious sects. The two
have nothing to do with each other. Keep chanting that over and over
again. Remember reality is the tool of Satan.
Thomas P.
"Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people whom we do not like."
Oscar Wilde
.





User: "bob young"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 04 Mar 2005 05:11:53 AM
John Baker wrote:

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:51:48 -0500, "RS" <rswarts@bu.edu> wrote:


"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:4222E8A2.E3146FBB@netvigator.com...

The primitives that made the story up made it for people of their own
simple
logic, so they ignored the first twenty years of the man's life.

"The son of a god lives for twenty years with nothing, but nothing,
recorded
about his most important and formative years".

With this kind of lunacy no wonder the ranks of atheism grow


Documents ranging from 50AD to 100AD spanning different communities dictate
the existence of Jesus of Nazareth . The religious-scholastic world hardly
disputes that through multiple attestation, he was a real person.

"Is not this the son of Mary and Joseph, the carpenter?"
Jesus wasn't well known because he wasn't meant to be at that time in His
life. It was the moment of His baptism when His mission began, and before
that it was His objective to live life and experience what we experience, to
be prepared for the trial that was to be placed before Him.

As per your last comment: "No wonder the ranks of atheism grow". We have a
perfectly good explaination for the growth of atheism. You most likely have
heart it, but it is a demon in our world meant to distract from the truth of
God. The Enemy wants nothing more than to gain souls for darkness and to
take away from God, though His efforts are futile and miniscule in the name
of Christ.


Odd that the faithful should equate logic and reason with darkness.

It's a case of getting the 'mumbo' mixed up with the 'jumbo'




-RS

.


User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 06 Mar 2005 05:26:19 PM
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:51:48 -0500, "RS" <rswarts@bu.edu> wrote:


"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:4222E8A2.E3146FBB@netvigator.com...

The primitives that made the story up made it for people of their own
simple
logic, so they ignored the first twenty years of the man's life.

"The son of a god lives for twenty years with nothing, but nothing,
recorded
about his most important and formative years".

With this kind of lunacy no wonder the ranks of atheism grow


Documents ranging from 50AD to 100AD spanning different communities dictate
the existence of Jesus of Nazareth . The religious-scholastic world hardly
disputes that through multiple attestation, he was a real person.

No they don't. But then you know that, so why keep repeating it?
The *O*N*L*Y* items from that era two paragraphs in Josephus. The
major one has obviously been tampered with afterwards as it uses
Christian language , terminology etc finishing up with "to this day",
at a time when Christians were very rare and it was still a Jewish
breakaway cult. The paragraph is out of context with the surrounding
material.
The other minor reference is to James "the brother of Jesus" but this
is not the James of the Gospels because it describes how he was
killed, and this is at odds with church history. It is widely
considered that this is an insertion as well.
The fact of the tampering makes it unreliable. The fact of the forgery
in the major part makes the minor one untrustworthy.
.
User: "thomas p"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 07 Mar 2005 12:43:04 PM
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:26:19 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:51:48 -0500, "RS" <rswarts@bu.edu> wrote:


"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:4222E8A2.E3146FBB@netvigator.com...

The primitives that made the story up made it for people of their own
simple
logic, so they ignored the first twenty years of the man's life.

"The son of a god lives for twenty years with nothing, but nothing,
recorded
about his most important and formative years".

With this kind of lunacy no wonder the ranks of atheism grow


Documents ranging from 50AD to 100AD spanning different communities dictate
the existence of Jesus of Nazareth . The religious-scholastic world hardly
disputes that through multiple attestation, he was a real person.


No they don't. But then you know that, so why keep repeating it?

The *O*N*L*Y* items from that era two paragraphs in Josephus. The
major one has obviously been tampered with afterwards as it uses
Christian language , terminology etc finishing up with "to this day",
at a time when Christians were very rare and it was still a Jewish
breakaway cult. The paragraph is out of context with the surrounding
material.

The other minor reference is to James "the brother of Jesus" but this
is not the James of the Gospels because it describes how he was
killed, and this is at odds with church history. It is widely
considered that this is an insertion as well.

The fact of the tampering makes it unreliable. The fact of the forgery
in the major part makes the minor one untrustworthy.

It says what they want to hear, therefore it must be true. You are
pointing out reasons why it should not be accepted, therefore you must
be evil. It all makes perfect sense, if one judges evidence based on
what one has decided to believe beforehand.
.
User: "Christopher A. Lee"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 07 Mar 2005 12:57:04 PM
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:43:04 +0100, thomas p
<tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote:

On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:26:19 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:51:48 -0500, "RS" <rswarts@bu.edu> wrote:


"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:4222E8A2.E3146FBB@netvigator.com...

The primitives that made the story up made it for people of their own
simple
logic, so they ignored the first twenty years of the man's life.

"The son of a god lives for twenty years with nothing, but nothing,
recorded
about his most important and formative years".

With this kind of lunacy no wonder the ranks of atheism grow


Documents ranging from 50AD to 100AD spanning different communities dictate
the existence of Jesus of Nazareth . The religious-scholastic world hardly
disputes that through multiple attestation, he was a real person.


No they don't. But then you know that, so why keep repeating it?

The *O*N*L*Y* items from that era two paragraphs in Josephus. The
major one has obviously been tampered with afterwards as it uses
Christian language , terminology etc finishing up with "to this day",
at a time when Christians were very rare and it was still a Jewish
breakaway cult. The paragraph is out of context with the surrounding
material.

The other minor reference is to James "the brother of Jesus" but this
is not the James of the Gospels because it describes how he was
killed, and this is at odds with church history. It is widely
considered that this is an insertion as well.

The fact of the tampering makes it unreliable. The fact of the forgery
in the major part makes the minor one untrustworthy.


It says what they want to hear, therefore it must be true. You are
pointing out reasons why it should not be accepted, therefore you must
be evil. It all makes perfect sense, if one judges evidence based on
what one has decided to believe beforehand.

But they shouldn't turn nasty when its doubtful nature is pointed out.
After all, they introduce it so they should be prepared to address
objections.
But even the ones who like to project a scholarly veneer do that.
.
User: "thomas p"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 08 Mar 2005 12:17:52 AM
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:57:04 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:43:04 +0100, thomas p
<tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote:

On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:26:19 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:51:48 -0500, "RS" <rswarts@bu.edu> wrote:


"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:4222E8A2.E3146FBB@netvigator.com...

The primitives that made the story up made it for people of their own
simple
logic, so they ignored the first twenty years of the man's life.

"The son of a god lives for twenty years with nothing, but nothing,
recorded
about his most important and formative years".

With this kind of lunacy no wonder the ranks of atheism grow


Documents ranging from 50AD to 100AD spanning different communities dictate
the existence of Jesus of Nazareth . The religious-scholastic world hardly
disputes that through multiple attestation, he was a real person.


No they don't. But then you know that, so why keep repeating it?

The *O*N*L*Y* items from that era two paragraphs in Josephus. The
major one has obviously been tampered with afterwards as it uses
Christian language , terminology etc finishing up with "to this day",
at a time when Christians were very rare and it was still a Jewish
breakaway cult. The paragraph is out of context with the surrounding
material.

The other minor reference is to James "the brother of Jesus" but this
is not the James of the Gospels because it describes how he was
killed, and this is at odds with church history. It is widely
considered that this is an insertion as well.

The fact of the tampering makes it unreliable. The fact of the forgery
in the major part makes the minor one untrustworthy.


It says what they want to hear, therefore it must be true. You are
pointing out reasons why it should not be accepted, therefore you must
be evil. It all makes perfect sense, if one judges evidence based on
what one has decided to believe beforehand.


But they shouldn't turn nasty when its doubtful nature is pointed out.

After all, they introduce it so they should be prepared to address
objections.

But even the ones who like to project a scholarly veneer do that.



That is because, and I am not trying to be humorous, they don't judge
their beliefs by the evidence, which would be the rational, objective
method. They judge the evidence by how it fits their beliefs. If it
does not confirm their beliefs, it is obviously false in their view.
We have seen them, sometimes with a good deal of skill, use science to
support one of their beliefs only to later declare science to be
unreliable when it contradicts a doctrine. They do not see it as
being inconsistent, because they start out with the assumption that
their beliefs are true and therefore the standard by which to judge
everything else. In their eyes you are the one being dishonest when
you suggest that their doctrine might not be true.
.




User: "bob young"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 05 Mar 2005 07:45:28 PM
RS wrote:

"bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:4222E8A2.E3146FBB@netvigator.com...

The primitives that made the story up made it for people of their own
simple
logic, so they ignored the first twenty years of the man's life.

"The son of a god lives for twenty years with nothing, but nothing,
recorded
about his most important and formative years".

With this kind of lunacy no wonder the ranks of atheism grow


Documents ranging from 50AD to 100AD spanning different communities dictate
the existence of Jesus of Nazareth .

There MAY have been a man called Jesus, but the son of a god? Lives in
obscurity from birth to age around twenty - the son of a god!!! Simple folk of
the time swallowed it but today?

The religious-scholastic world hardly
disputes that through multiple attestation, he was a real person.

"Is not this the son of Mary and Joseph, the carpenter?"
Jesus wasn't well known because he wasn't meant to be at that time in His
life. It was the moment of His baptism when His mission began, and before
that it was His objective to live life and experience what we experience, to
be prepared for the trial that was to be placed before Him.

As per your last comment: "No wonder the ranks of atheism grow". We have a
perfectly good explaination for the growth of atheism. You most likely have
heart it, but it is a demon in our world meant to distract from the truth of
God.

Christian continually talk about 'the truth'. There are so many 'Truth
Sermons; no doubt, like me years ago, you have listened to so many of them.
Why?
The answer is obvious

The Enemy wants nothing more than to gain souls for darkness and to
take away from God, though His efforts are futile and miniscule in the name
of Christ.

So anyone not of your faith will live in darkness ? That alone is sufficient
proof of how inhumane your belief system is.
Bob
Humanist Brit
Hong Kong
"Immature and defenseless children are early indoctrinated with religious ideas
by their parents, grandparents, Sunday school teachers, etc. By adulthood they
become convinced that they possess the truth, and spend the rest of their lives
elaborating and defending their religion."
[C. W. Dalton, "The Right Brain and Religion"]


.

User: "wcb"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 01 Mar 2005 03:32:43 AM
RS wrote:


"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1109561215.488260.95470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

If Hell, as described in the Bible, really does exist; No one should be
suprised at who will be roasting and who won't. You know who you are.
This alone should motivate people to lead a moral, clean, decent life.
Just in case.


J, what is sad is that you and the pluthera of posts below you have
completely misinterpreted Christian faith.

The path of a Christian is to grow to be more like Christ, and to trust in
Him above all things.

If you xians want to become like Jesus so much, why do none of you
actually bother to follow his commands? Pray strictly in private in
your closets, not publically.
Sell all you have an give to the poor.
Luke 14:36
So likewise, Whoseoever he be of you that foresaketh not all he hath,
he cannot be my disciple.
Luke 12:33
Sell all you hath and give alms; provide
yourselves with bags that wax not old, a treasure
in heaven that fails not, where no thief approacheth,
nor moth corrupt.
No religous oaths, not on money not in a court on
a bible, not being sworn in as president.
No voting for a president that lied us into a war.
No divorces.
Basically, we don't have any christians in America, do we?
Why then, do you faux xians prattle and spew at us while
refusing to do god's will as expressed without ambiguity
by Jesus Christ?
Why preach at us when YOU have a lot of work to do
to become a real Christian yourself?
When you have the guts to sell all you have like Christ
repeately demanded, THEN come back here and bloviate at us.
Not until then. You don't really believe this bible, no more
than me, an Atheist.
Not one of you bleating, mouth flapping, insincere, preaching
windbags does. Not one. I am tired of being preached at by liars who
themselves will not follow their own advice and follow the bible
and the teachings of Christ.

Christ assurred us that for those who recognize Him
as savior, they shall not face judgement, but be guided to the Father
through Him. Those who do not know Him (those who openly reject Him) will
face judgment. Through Christ, sins are forgiven, but one must ask with a
true heart to repent in order to merit forgiveness.

Actions, therefore, are a huge part of it (not the only part). One must
strive to live a life free from sin, especially mortal sin (that which is
harmful to yourself, others, or the Kingdom of God). If a person calls
himself or herself Christian and doesn't know Christ, their actions show
witness to that. if a person is willingly living in sin with the attitude
of "sin now, be forgiven later" or "I can sin since God will forgive me
anyhow", that person is living in one of the worst sins: Pride. If a
person truly knows Christ and trusts in His promises, he or she would be
called out
of sin by the grace of the Holy Spirit. A moral, clean, and decent life
isn't enough therefore, if one is living that moral, clean, and decent
life
for himself or for the world. If, however, one is leading a moral, clean,
and decent life for the glory of the Kingdom of Heaven, and if that person
trusts in Christ as King and Savior, that person is born again into Spirit
and belongs not to this world, but to the kingdom of heaven.

-RS

--
Cheerful Charlie
.
User: "RS"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 01 Mar 2005 03:20:34 PM
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:4223d34a$0$88034$16895aa@news.airnews.net...

RS wrote:
If you xians want to become like Jesus so much, why do none of you
actually bother to follow his commands? Pray strictly in private in
your closets, not publically.

Why do none of us? Are you presuming every single one of us do this? I was
praying on this newsgroup earlier... I apologized for it because I erred in
my own teachings and was being hypocritical. I removed that hypocricy then.

Sell all you have an give to the poor.

On the contrary, this isn't so much a teaching of Christ. Let's look at the
scripture.

Luke 14:36
So likewise, Whoseoever he be of you that foresaketh not all he hath,
he cannot be my disciple.

There is no Luke 14:36. I've looked in four different versions. Not there.
I presume, of course, you meant Luke 14:33
"Who does not renounce all his possessions cannot be my disciple." We must
recognize the context of this passage. Christ was speaking to the crowds
who were travelling with him, telling these crowds what they needed to do to
continue following him. This is referring to the prediction of Christ as
those who will sit on the 12 thrones in heaven. Continue it further,
theologically, to Matthew 19, we get "And everyone who has left houses or
brothers or sisters or fathers or mother or children or fields for the sake
of our Heavenly Father will recieve a hundred times more in the life to
come."
Followers who adhered to this all too literally are known as Counter cult
groups. In all reality, it refers to the willingness to be martyred for
Christ. Those who refuse to leave these things behind when Christ calls
them to aren't true disciples of Christ. Those who kling to material things
can't be followers of Christ. Those who rely on the generosity of others
and are generous to others, however, can be true followers of Christ. I am
looking about my room right now. My room serves as a workstation, office,
bedroom, and living space all in one. I look at my possessions and realize
them to be one thing. All of my "possessions" (of the vast majority of
them) aren't my own. Through the generosity of family and friends and in
exchange for my hard work, I have been given them and the ability to
purchase them. I do not seek after riches or wealth. I do not store
treasures on earth. If someone were to break into my studio and take
everything I own, I would still be wealthy for my treasures aren't these
physical things that I use, but the values of my faith.

Luke 12:33
Sell all you hath and give alms; provide
yourselves with bags that wax not old, a treasure
in heaven that fails not, where no thief approacheth,
nor moth corrupt.

I would, therefore, not sell the gifts that have been given me by the
generosity of others. Rather, I would make use of them as I was meant to,
so that I can educate myself further and be able to provide for a family and
to help those in need, rather than concerning myself and hoarding treasures
for myself.

No religous oaths, not on money not in a court on
a bible, not being sworn in as president.

I have never taken an oath on money, nor in a court, nor been sworn in as
president... Though there is nothing wrong with making a promise before God,
such as one does when he is baptized or confirmed.

No voting for a president that lied us into a war.

It was indeed a sad election. I didn't apperciate any of the candidates,
but voted for Bush even though my vote meant for nothing (New York State
went overwhelmingly to Kerry).

No divorces.

I haven't divorced nor do I believe in divorce. There are Christians who
have, but the Church still recognizes the marriages as valid (that is why a
married-in-the-Church and divorced-by-the-state couple can't remarry in the
Church unless the first marriage is enulled).

Basically, we don't have any christians in America, do we?
Why then, do you faux xians prattle and spew at us while
refusing to do god's will as expressed without ambiguity
by Jesus Christ?

That is a claim that you've no right to make. Christ is the sole author of
determination, and the Father in heaven the sole source of authority and
judgment. I believe there to be good Christians in America. I consider
myself to be strong in faith, myself. That doesn't make me a better person
than you. On the contrary, you could be a nicer person to me, and one who
is more aware of the feelings of those around you. I tend to be quite
oblivious sometimes to those around me. I know, however, that God's will
for me isn't to take a vow of poverty and celibacy. I know that if I
concern my life with the hoarding of material riches on earth, that I will
be consumed by them and lose heaven.

Why preach at us when YOU have a lot of work to do
to become a real Christian yourself?

Have I? A real Christian is one who puts his faith and heart in Christ.
Living a lonely homeless life doesn't make one a real Christian. Knowing
that what material possessions you have aren't really yours, but blessings
from the Father, and understanding that they mean nothing in the end is
where the heart of Christianity is inspired.

When you have the guts to sell all you have like Christ
repeately demanded, THEN come back here and bloviate at us.
Not until then. You don't really believe this bible, no more
than me, an Atheist.

That judgment is one that you make out of misinterpretation of scripture.
Like right now. Sitting near my left hand is a cell phone. It was given to
me as a gift. Am I then to sell it and give the money to the poor? No, for
the phone isn't mine. This computer I am typing on was purchased for me by
my parents for use at university. Am I to sell it and give money to the
poor? No, because it isn't mine to sell. The television, the lamp, the
speakers, the printer, the table, the chair, the clothing, the sheets, etc.
etc. are gifts to me from others, or purchased by myself from monies I
secured in exchange for labor. I recognize, however, that none of these
possessions are my own and I recognize the day when these same possessions
will be taken from me and given to others (my wife and children) when
nothing I have will be my own, but theirs.

Not one of you bleating, mouth flapping, insincere, preaching
windbags does. Not one. I am tired of being preached at by liars who
themselves will not follow their own advice and follow the bible
and the teachings of Christ.

I am sorry that you are tired of this, but it is a fact of this world. Why,
though, do you judge all of us in the same group? "Not one of you". You
call us insincere preachers. Have I preached to you? As far as I am aware,
talking about my beliefs doesn't qualify as preaching to you. I recognize
hypocracy. I am quick to correct it. I do take my advice, however, and I
wouldn't ask anyone to give up everything that has been given to them for
the sake of religion, for what possessions we do have, unless hoarded for
the sole purpose of having them, aren't are own.
You are an atheist. I respect that. I do not agree with it, but in the end
it is your decision to make just as it is mine to be a theist. I do sin, I
recognize that. I recognize that Christ has expected certian things of his
original disciples and though I would like to be able to emulate that, I
can't. Though I have the ability to use possessions around me, however, I
recognize that they aren't mine to keep. I am looking at my table top right
now and recognize this: The desk isn't my own. It is rent-covered by a loan
which my family is paying for. The computer, printer, and speakers aren't
my own, but purchased by my family. The cell phone is a gift from a friend,
the cross, prayer book, and bible aren't my own, but gifts. The music
player and CD are gifts as well. When I look around my room, I see many
things, most of them I have to give back. I also realize one thing. If
someone broke into my room and took everything, I would only loose about 400
dollars of things I consider purchased with my own money (which isn't my
own, exactly, since it was exchanged for labor). Think of St. Francis of
Assisi. He renounced all of his worldly possessions, giving them back to
those who gave them to him (his father). Still, he labored for food and
clothing and supplies to build the roof over his head. Christ and his
apostles, as well, had money that was their own from labor (they had a money
bag). With that, they purchased clothing and food.
Think of Lazarus, who was a true follower of Christ. His sister was as
well, who was well-to-do. The faith comes from teh recogniztion that the
possessions we can make use of aren't ours to claim, and the moment we make
claim to them, the moment we accept them and store them as treasures on
earth. That doesn't mean that I would hand my computer to you if you walked
into my room and demanded it. It isn't mine to give away, but he who paid
for it.
-RS
.
User: "wcb"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 02 Mar 2005 03:36:13 AM
RS wrote:


"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:4223d34a$0$88034$16895aa@news.airnews.net...

RS wrote:


If you xians want to become like Jesus so much, why do none of you
actually bother to follow his commands? Pray strictly in private in
your closets, not publically.


Why do none of us? Are you presuming every single one of us do this? I
was praying on this newsgroup earlier... I apologized for it because I
erred in
my own teachings and was being hypocritical. I removed that hypocricy
then.

Sell all you have an give to the poor.


On the contrary, this isn't so much a teaching of Christ. Let's look at
the scripture.

Luke 14:36
So likewise, Whoseoever he be of you that foresaketh not all he hath,
he cannot be my disciple.


There is no Luke 14:36. I've looked in four different versions. Not
there. I presume, of course, you meant Luke 14:33

Sorry, typo, Luke 14:33
But its easy enough to find. Give up all you have, everything.
jesus repeatedly tells us that. Whosoever gives up homes, lans,
houses will recieve 100 fold in the next world.
Jesus here was predicting the end of the world, soon.
Not 2000 years later, but then and there.
Any possible stumbling block to heaven was to
be abandoned. families, homes, belongings, all of it.
This is the whole thrust of Luke 14.
Hate your father, mother, wife, family, brothers, sister
and own life also. Luke 14:26. Abandon all you have.
Luke 14:33. Note Luke 14:25, these things were spoken to
"Great multitudes". His teachings
for everybody, not an esoteric few.
See alos Luke 12, again spoken to multitues. See
Luke 12:21 - 34.
Sell all, give alms, do not worry about the morrow.
See parallel verses in Matthew 6. Do not worry about whatto drink, what to
wear.

"Who does not renounce all his possessions cannot be my disciple." We
must
recognize the context of this passage.

He is speaking to multitudes. See Luke 14:25.
Hate your family, your own life alos.
See Luke 14:26. Foresake all you have. Luke 14:33.
Sell all you have. Luke 12:31-4.
He takes everything. All of it.
See Matthew 6:19. Lay not up treasures on earth.
take no thought for the morrow.
You cannot serve god and mammon.
See Matthew 19. Rich men cannot go to heaven.
See Mark 10 for more of the same. And Luke 18.

Sell all you have and give to the poor.
The rich who refuse that are not saved.
Matthew 10:37, compare to Luke 14:26

Christ was speaking to the crowds
who were travelling with him, telling these crowds what they needed to do
to
continue following him. This is referring to the prediction of Christ as
those who will sit on the 12 thrones in heaven. Continue it further,
theologically, to Matthew 19, we get "And everyone who has left houses or
brothers or sisters or fathers or mother or children or fields for the
sake of our Heavenly Father will recieve a hundred times more in the life
to come."

Followers who adhered to this all too literally are known as Counter cult
groups. In all reality, it refers to the willingness to be martyred for
Christ. Those who refuse to leave these things behind when Christ calls
them to aren't true disciples of Christ. Those who kling to material
things
can't be followers of Christ. Those who rely on the generosity of others
and are generous to others, however, can be true followers of Christ. I
am
looking about my room right now. My room serves as a workstation, office,
bedroom, and living space all in one. I look at my possessions and
realize
them to be one thing. All of my "possessions" (of the vast majority of
them) aren't my own. Through the generosity of family and friends and in
exchange for my hard work, I have been given them and the ability to
purchase them. I do not seek after riches or wealth. I do not store
treasures on earth. If someone were to break into my studio and take
everything I own, I would still be wealthy for my treasures aren't these
physical things that I use, but the values of my faith.

Luke 12:33
Sell all you hath and give alms; provide
yourselves with bags that wax not old, a treasure
in heaven that fails not, where no thief approacheth,
nor moth corrupt.


I would, therefore, not sell the gifts that have been given me by the
generosity of others. Rather, I would make use of them as I was meant to,
so that I can educate myself further and be able to provide for a family
and to help those in need, rather than concerning myself and hoarding
treasures for myself.

No religous oaths, not on money not in a court on
a bible, not being sworn in as president.


I have never taken an oath on money, nor in a court, nor been sworn in as
president... Though there is nothing wrong with making a promise before
God, such as one does when he is baptized or confirmed.

No voting for a president that lied us into a war.


It was indeed a sad election. I didn't apperciate any of the candidates,
but voted for Bush even though my vote meant for nothing (New York State
went overwhelmingly to Kerry).

No divorces.


I haven't divorced nor do I believe in divorce. There are Christians who
have, but the Church still recognizes the marriages as valid (that is why
a married-in-the-Church and divorced-by-the-state couple can't remarry in
the Church unless the first marriage is enulled).

Basically, we don't have any christians in America, do we?
Why then, do you faux xians prattle and spew at us while
refusing to do god's will as expressed without ambiguity
by Jesus Christ?


That is a claim that you've no right to make. Christ is the sole author
of determination, and the Father in heaven the sole source of authority
and
judgment. I believe there to be good Christians in America. I consider
myself to be strong in faith, myself. That doesn't make me a better
person
than you. On the contrary, you could be a nicer person to me, and one who
is more aware of the feelings of those around you. I tend to be quite
oblivious sometimes to those around me. I know, however, that God's will
for me isn't to take a vow of poverty and celibacy. I know that if I
concern my life with the hoarding of material riches on earth, that I will
be consumed by them and lose heaven.

Why preach at us when YOU have a lot of work to do
to become a real Christian yourself?


Have I? A real Christian is one who puts his faith and heart in Christ.
Living a lonely homeless life doesn't make one a real Christian. Knowing
that what material possessions you have aren't really yours, but blessings
from the Father, and understanding that they mean nothing in the end is
where the heart of Christianity is inspired.

When you have the guts to sell all you have like Christ
repeately demanded, THEN come back here and bloviate at us.
Not until then. You don't really believe this bible, no more
than me, an Atheist.


That judgment is one that you make out of misinterpretation of scripture.
Like right now. Sitting near my left hand is a cell phone. It was given
to
me as a gift. Am I then to sell it and give the money to the poor? No,
for
the phone isn't mine. This computer I am typing on was purchased for me
by
my parents for use at university. Am I to sell it and give money to the
poor? No, because it isn't mine to sell. The television, the lamp, the
speakers, the printer, the table, the chair, the clothing, the sheets,
etc. etc. are gifts to me from others, or purchased by myself from monies
I
secured in exchange for labor. I recognize, however, that none of these
possessions are my own and I recognize the day when these same possessions
will be taken from me and given to others (my wife and children) when
nothing I have will be my own, but theirs.

Not one of you bleating, mouth flapping, insincere, preaching
windbags does. Not one. I am tired of being preached at by liars who
themselves will not follow their own advice and follow the bible
and the teachings of Christ.


I am sorry that you are tired of this, but it is a fact of this world.
Why,
though, do you judge all of us in the same group? "Not one of you". You
call us insincere preachers. Have I preached to you? As far as I am
aware,
talking about my beliefs doesn't qualify as preaching to you. I recognize
hypocracy. I am quick to correct it. I do take my advice, however, and I
wouldn't ask anyone to give up everything that has been given to them for
the sake of religion, for what possessions we do have, unless hoarded for
the sole purpose of having them, aren't are own.

You are an atheist. I respect that. I do not agree with it, but in the
end
it is your decision to make just as it is mine to be a theist. I do sin,
I
recognize that. I recognize that Christ has expected certian things of
his original disciples and though I would like to be able to emulate that,
I
can't. Though I have the ability to use possessions around me, however, I
recognize that they aren't mine to keep. I am looking at my table top
right
now and recognize this: The desk isn't my own. It is rent-covered by a
loan
which my family is paying for. The computer, printer, and speakers aren't
my own, but purchased by my family. The cell phone is a gift from a
friend,
the cross, prayer book, and bible aren't my own, but gifts. The music
player and CD are gifts as well. When I look around my room, I see many
things, most of them I have to give back. I also realize one thing. If
someone broke into my room and took everything, I would only loose about
400 dollars of things I consider purchased with my own money (which isn't
my
own, exactly, since it was exchanged for labor). Think of St. Francis of
Assisi. He renounced all of his worldly possessions, giving them back to
those who gave them to him (his father). Still, he labored for food and
clothing and supplies to build the roof over his head. Christ and his
apostles, as well, had money that was their own from labor (they had a
money
bag). With that, they purchased clothing and food.

Think of Lazarus, who was a true follower of Christ. His sister was as
well, who was well-to-do. The faith comes from teh recogniztion that the
possessions we can make use of aren't ours to claim, and the moment we
make claim to them, the moment we accept them and store them as treasures
on
earth. That doesn't mean that I would hand my computer to you if you
walked
into my room and demanded it. It isn't mine to give away, but he who paid
for it.

-RS

--
Cheerful Charlie
.



User: "jwk"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 28 Feb 2005 08:45:27 AM
RS wrote:

"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1109561215.488260.95470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

If Hell, as described in the Bible, really does exist; No one

should be

suprised at who will be roasting and who won't. You know who you

are.

This alone should motivate people to lead a moral, clean, decent

life.

Just in case.


J, what is sad is that you and the pluthera of posts below you have
completely misinterpreted Christian faith.

The path of a Christian is to grow to be more like Christ, and to

trust in

Him above all things. Christ assurred us that for those who

recognize Him

as savior, they shall not face judgement, but be guided to the Father
through Him. Those who do not know Him (those who openly reject Him)

will

face judgment. Through Christ, sins are forgiven, but one must ask

with a

true heart to repent in order to merit forgiveness.

Actions, therefore, are a huge part of it (not the only part). One

must

strive to live a life free from sin, especially mortal sin (that

which is

harmful to yourself, others, or the Kingdom of God). If a person

calls

himself or herself Christian and doesn't know Christ, their actions

show

witness to that. if a person is willingly living in sin with the

attitude

of "sin now, be forgiven later" or "I can sin since God will forgive

me

anyhow", that person is living in one of the worst sins: Pride. If a

person

truly knows Christ and trusts in His promises, he or she would be

called out

of sin by the grace of the Holy Spirit. A moral, clean, and decent

life

isn't enough therefore, if one is living that moral, clean, and

decent life

for himself or for the world. If, however, one is leading a moral,

clean,

and decent life for the glory of the Kingdom of Heaven, and if that

person

trusts in Christ as King and Savior, that person is born again into

Spirit

and belongs not to this world, but to the kingdom of heaven.

That was real sweet and all. Shame it wasn't what your lord Jesus
said. I like your version better.
jwk
.

User: "The Real Riain"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 28 Feb 2005 01:03:47 PM
There is no Jesus and there is no holy spirit.
There is but ONE GOD, and God is certainly not the God that J Young
describes or that you describe.
Try studying some logic and physics and RATIONAL thought.
"RS" <rswarts@bu.edu> wrote in message news:cvugmd$ict$1@news3.bu.edu...
:
: "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
: news:1109561215.488260.95470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
: > If Hell, as described in the Bible, really does exist; No one should
be
: > suprised at who will be roasting and who won't. You know who you
are.
: > This alone should motivate people to lead a moral, clean, decent
life.
: > Just in case.
: >
:
: J, what is sad is that you and the pluthera of posts below you have
: completely misinterpreted Christian faith.
:
: The path of a Christian is to grow to be more like Christ, and to
trust in
: Him above all things. Christ assurred us that for those who recognize
Him
: as savior, they shall not face judgement, but be guided to the Father
: through Him. Those who do not know Him (those who openly reject Him)
will
: face judgment. Through Christ, sins are forgiven, but one must ask
with a
: true heart to repent in order to merit forgiveness.
:
: Actions, therefore, are a huge part of it (not the only part). One
must
: strive to live a life free from sin, especially mortal sin (that which
is
: harmful to yourself, others, or the Kingdom of God). If a person
calls
: himself or herself Christian and doesn't know Christ, their actions
show
: witness to that. if a person is willingly living in sin with the
attitude
: of "sin now, be forgiven later" or "I can sin since God will forgive
me
: anyhow", that person is living in one of the worst sins: Pride. If a
person
: truly knows Christ and trusts in His promises, he or she would be
called out
: of sin by the grace of the Holy Spirit. A moral, clean, and decent
life
: isn't enough therefore, if one is living that moral, clean, and decent
life
: for himself or for the world. If, however, one is leading a moral,
clean,
: and decent life for the glory of the Kingdom of Heaven, and if that
person
: trusts in Christ as King and Savior, that person is born again into
Spirit
: and belongs not to this world, but to the kingdom of heaven.
:
: -RS
:
:
.

User: "Tock"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 28 Feb 2005 10:40:51 AM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1109561215.488260.95470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

If Hell, as described in the Bible, really does exist; No one should be
suprised at who will be roasting and who won't. You know who you are.
This alone should motivate people to lead a moral, clean, decent life.
Just in case.

Ah, yes . . . a religion based on fear and intimidation . . .
-Tock
.
User: "The Real Riain"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 28 Feb 2005 01:07:30 PM
Amazing how everyone in this thread assumes that there are only TWO
options: Christianity and Atheism.
Amazing how stupid Americans are.
"Tock" <tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:nQHUd.20044$D34.14615@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
:
: "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
: news:1109561215.488260.95470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
: > If Hell, as described in the Bible, really does exist; No one should
be
: > suprised at who will be roasting and who won't. You know who you
are.
: > This alone should motivate people to lead a moral, clean, decent
life.
: > Just in case.
:
:
:
: Ah, yes . . . a religion based on fear and intimidation . . .
: -Tock
:
:
.


User: "DianaC"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 27 Feb 2005 11:44:49 PM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1109561215.488260.95470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

If Hell, as described in the Bible, really does exist; No one should be
suprised at who will be roasting and who won't. You know who you are.
This alone should motivate people to lead a moral, clean, decent life.
Just in case.

Except of course that leading a moral, clean and decent life isn't
sufficient. I'm a theist, but I have to admit that for many of us, the
primary requirement for admittance to heaven isn't moral living, it's
believing the right thing.
.
User: "thomas p"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 28 Feb 2005 05:13:25 AM
Which is both silly and immoral.
Thomas P.
.


User: "rj"

Title: Re: If there is a Hell 27 Feb 2005 09:59:44 PM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in news:1109561215.488260.95470
@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

If Hell, as described in the Bible, really does exist; No one should be
suprised at who will be roasting and who won't. You know who you are.
This alone should motivate people to lead a moral, clean, decent life.
Just in case.


One does not need the concept of hell or heaven to be enticed to lead a
good clean moral life. Every atheist I know leads a moral decent life.
Now if one is Catholic, then one needs to accessorize. Add a crucifix,
various colored scapulars, a few well chosen relics, a few statues of Mary
and Joseph for the home and one of Jesus for the car, a rosary or three, at
least one miraculous medal, various prayer books, a bible, holy water, and
a few holy cards to be used for bookmarks. Then add some novenas, a couple
of masses both high and low, and then for kicks add a confession and the
Pilgim Madonna, statues of the various saints, and then you have it!
Nearly guaranteed salvation provided you go to mass every sunday and fill
that collection basket!

I am sure I missed something that is a must have, but if I did, it isn't
much.
rj
.


  Page 8 of 15

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 


Related Articles