On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:59:13 -0800, after pondering
deep thoughts, jw <jw<no>@yahoo.com> spake thusly:

However, a "lie" is a deliberate falsehood.

I am not a liar. At the very most, I have misunderstood you. And if I
have misunderstood you, for the 10th time, I apologize.

You are a liar.

Keep it up, dumbshit.

You were saying something about suing over words???

Not just words, dumbass; libel.

I don't think he got that one, folks. :)

You are well on your way to a libel suit.

Good! I could use the excitement! My days have been a
bit boring lately, given that I have been home with a
back injury. I could use a day out in court.

You joke; I do not.

Maybe you should. You might not be so uptight about
this. :) Let's face it John. You are upset with me,
because I was able to document everything you said.
That is my talent, when making statements about intent.
I archive everything and I have a good memory for what
people say and do. Five years from now, I'll remember
sending you this message and much of what it said. I
don't make accusations that I can't back up and I
always use peoples' own words against them, to show and
prove their deception. It's not for me that I do this,
but so that others can see what these people are really
like and not be fooled by them. As a pastor, I have
learned to protect the saints.

I think most people in these news groups misunderstand
me. Some people think I'm angry with these people.
The only thing I'm angry about, is that they twist the
word of God to fit their doctrines. That angers me,
but not as hatred for individuals. Rather, hatred for
actions that spit in the face of God. There's a big
difference. Read the prophets and see if they were
angry. Many times, they were and blasted the people.
But their words were true and that's what matters.

I'm not even angry at you, John. I am however, angry
at the way that you libel people and attack them. It
is libel and a vicious attack, because what you say
isn't true. But I wouldn't sue you over it. I think
posting your lies for all to see, is enough. :)

I have explained-- whether you are smart enough to understand or not--
I have a reading comprehension problem that will be SUPER easy to
demonstrate and document in court.

Of this, we have no doubt. In fact, I'll help you. :)

I can also demonstrate easily enough that you are a dumbass bigot; one
who brings NO honor to God.

Yes, please make sure to put that in the paperwork, as
your reason for suing me.

"Pastor David Raymond is a dumbass bigot; one who
brings no honor to God."

I'm sure they'll care. :)

You might also want to make note-- while you are free and you still
have all your property, that I have told NUMEROUS people in here I
don't read the posts from the top to the bottom. I archive EVERYTHING,
so I read from bottom to top.

You don't have to archive it. It's publicly available
on Google. You see, unlike you, I don't hide what I've
said.

Anything you want to archive, you can archive. What the copyright says
is that it better not appear anywhere else.

Of course, you are too stupid, too illiterate, to even understand a
simple copyright notice.

Ideas are not copyrightable.

"Copyright does not protect ideas..."

http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html#what_protect

It is also very much allowed to bring in quotes of the
person suing you, to prove that their claim is false.
When suing someone, you cannot hide from your own
words, John. :) Everything you typed into these
messages, is admissible in court. Did you really think
you could bring in my messages and then cry "copyright"
to prevent me from bringing in yours? Your posts are
copyrighted, but mine aren't? <chuckle>

If you think you explained something to me previously, I likely
haven't read up that far yet.

And while my explanation may not be sufficient for you (fools never
listen, and you are fitting that description better every day), it
will work just fine for a judge.

Now what were you saying about that libel thing? :)

"Libel" is a statement that is false, that can be DEMONSTRATED false,
and that can be proven that the libeler KNEW was false when he made
the statement.

I have not libeled you. You ARE a liar. You add 2 and 2
and you get 22.

You have when you have made claims about deception on
my part, after I have documented your words, which
prove that you lied. As I said John, you don't get to
hide from your own words, by claiming, "copyright".

You on the other hand, libel me merely because I don't agree you.

I don't care if you agree with me. You would change
your mind tomorrow anyway. :)

And
even after I apologized REPEATEDLY for the misunderstanding over the
KJV, you continue to attempt to flay me over it. There is no
understanding, no compassion.

You apologized and then did it again on more than one
occasion. And it wasn't even involving different
subjects, but rather, the same subject.

And btw John, apologizing in a message and then
slamming the person may qualify as sincere in your
universe, but not in ours. :)

I guess you need something unimportant to fume about.
Small people intent issues.

I'm not the one threatening a law suit over a usenet
message. <chuckle>

Would you like to see how many times I
corrected you and how many times you kept insisting
that I am KJV Only?

As I have said repeatedly, dumbshit, I am frequently
"slow to catch on."

And I have believed you every time you've said it. :)

Lie. Each time I have said it, you have only called me a liar.
So you have once again LIED.

That isn't true. You see John, I do believe you are
slow to catch on. You just proved it again, because
you didn't even realize that you were being insulted
(although I said it in humor).

I didn't say you lied about being slow. I don't think
anyone here thinks you're lying about that. :)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^INSULT ABOVE^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There ya go. I did it again and this time, I went
ahead and underlined the insult above. See if you can
find it this time around and you'll win the secret
decoder ring. :)

It may take mentioning several times, it may take mentioning a dozen
times.

John, it's been almost a year now. Just how slow are
you???

In here, I won't comment further. I can also document the answer to
THAT question in court. keep pushing it, and you will find out as I
clean your pockets.

Good. I have way too much lint in them anyway. :)

My statements may have been in error, and I have no problem admitting
that. Your VICIOUS counterattack

To state that I made a counterattack, is to admit that
you made an attack first. Therefore, all I need do, is
to present this message, with your admission that you
attacked first. You just destroyed your own case.
Thanks. Now I won't need a lawyer. <chuckle>

(where a Christian should be loving and forgive 70 X 7),
have you reached the 70 X 7, yet?You have not, which
means every time you attack me after I apologize,
you flip Jesus off.

It says to forgive your brother 70 X 7. You have not
demonstrated that you are my brother. But since you
claim to be one, please apply the following Scripture.

1 Corinthians 6:1,5-7

1) Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go
to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
5) I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a
wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to
judge between his brethren?
6) But brother goeth to law with brother, and that
before the unbelievers.
7) Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you,
because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not
rather take wrong? why do ye not rather suffer
yourselves to be defrauded?

OTOH, you haven't registered my issues YET.
You seem to be so stupid that you think you
are the only one who is allowed to have issues,
and you DO have issues.

It takes you over a year to catch on and I'm the one
who's stupid?

You are stupid when you claim to be so smart,
yet you don't understand a clinical diagnosis.

You haven't given anyone "a clinical diagnosis". And
if you do understand it, why do you keep posting and
lying about people, when you know you have a problem
and shouldn't be doing that? That is why people don't
cut you any slack. Maybe you should put a note at the
top of every message you write, telling people that you
have a mental issue and may ramble on and attack people
for no cause, even when they agree with you. That way,
people will just kill file you up front and you won't
have these problems in usenet. I'm quite serious.

And I'm not stupid. Lots of bright people
are slow learners. One has nothing to do
with the other.

I didn't say anything about the speed with which
someone learns. I would much rather have someone learn
slow, than not at all and yet, insist that they are
right. You choose not to learn at all and to insist
that you are right. You claim that you learn slow, but
when you claim to have finally caught on, you
immediately revert back to saying the same things you
did before you supposedly learned.

And AGAIN you show how little you know,
but how eager you are to tell the whole
planet how smart you are.

I am smart. However, that has nothing to do with this.
It does have to do with my ability to understand what
it is you are doing. But frankly John, it doesn't take
a very bright bulb to see your problem. :)

Einstein was one of the brightest men of our age,
yet he was VERY forgetful.

He didn't however, forget that he was wrong about an
equation the next day. :)

Did his forgetfulness make him "stupid!?" No.
But you would have called him stupid.

I would have called him stupid if he realized that an
equation was wrong and spent the next number of years
claiming it was right and putting down other people
because they said it was wrong. That's what you're
doing here.

You know, I wouldn't be giving you a hard time over
this, but you're the one who after admitting this,
keeps on attacking, instead of pausing to think about
what you've said and correcting yourself.

I could care less.

Save it for court.

I have. It is all saved right here on my PC and in
Google, including your admission that you attacked
first, John. :)

For you to compound what you see as
my "misbehavior" with even more severe
misbehavior is not the solution.

Telling the truth is not, "misbehavior", nor does it
qualify as libel. You don't seem to understand that I
can say whatever I want about you, as long as I can
prove it. :) I can say that you are the prince of the
world of flying monkeys, as long as I have your DNA
results to prove it. :)

Yet you will not turn the cheek. You will attempt
to hit back 5 times harder.

Let's not play dumb. You have been attacking me and
lying about me for a long time now. I, on the other
hand, have not lied about you once.

How Christian!

NOT!

And I don't bother to finish your posts because
I have little time for ignorance and bigotry.

You are both ignorant and a bigot.

If you admit that you don't finish my posts, then you
admit that you respond and attack me, before you know
what I have said at the end. Yet, you claim to read
from bottom to top, instead of top to bottom. :)

Thanks for another fun start to my day, John. :)