LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!

Religions > Bible > LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!

LINK TO THIS PAGE

rating : 0 | 0

Page 1 of 5

Topic:	Religions > Bible
User:	"Craig Chilton"
Date:	28 Nov 2003 12:18:01 PM
Object:	LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!

FIRST, there was the post, in which I made the prediction...
right after Viagra come onto the market. To which I alluded
in the NEXT item in this posting, below. But just when one
thinks they can count on "Google's" newsgroup search
engine, it let's one down, or I'd have repeated it here. Has
anyone else discovered that, once in awhile, no matter how
hard they try to finad an article that ythey, themselves, had
posted, Google couldn't FIND it? Frustrating!!! I have never
cancelled any of my own posts (and obviously, no one else's)
from Google, so I'm mystified that these occasional gaps in their
archives -- which shouldn't be there -- manifest themselves!
Anyway, on to the next step ---
THEN there was THIS post...
From: Craig Chilton (xanadu222@home.com)
Subject: Partly OFF-Topic, but FUNNY! Edell comments on
Viagra & the Porn Industry
Newsgroups: alt.abortion, talk.abortion, alt.bible, alt.christnet,
alt.abortion.inequity
Date: 2001-07-08 10:52:09 PST
Viagra Good For The Porn Industry?
by Dr. Dean Edell
July 06, 2001 --
This is a hysterical article; I don’t know if you’ll appreciate
this. This is the changing nature of an industry I’m sure most of us
don’t think about. It’s the making of X-rated films and how Viagra
has changed this industry.
They profile an old-timer here -- an actor in the industry. He’s 43
years old. I don’t want to tell you his name -- it’s printed in the
newspaper, but I feel kind of weird about saying it on the show.
One director teases him and calls him "blue tongue" because has
popped so many Viagra. The actor says, "I’m not ashamed of it.
I rely on Viagra for many shoots. People know I use it. It doesn’t
make me any less of a man or a person."
Of course, we know what the drug is supposed to be used for, but
I'm afraid it has become a recreational drug. This actor says here has
taken as much as 100 mg a day and he knows of peers of his who
use even more and with the current pace of hectic film production.
Actors are taking the pill for every shoot, turning the industry into
an unwitting mass experiment.
Some actresses and directors are getting fed-up with it, rolling
their eyes whenever they see the tell-tale signs of a Viagra actor,
which includes a glazed look. Is that one of the side effects? Can
any of you listeners out there let me know if this glazed look is a
side effect?
A veteran actress says they’re using drugs designed for men with
particular problems, and these guys don’t have that particular
problem, yet the pill has created dozens of male stars and eliminated
so many annoying production snafus that industry players say
they are willing to put up with the occasional lapses and potential
health problems.
"I put Viagra right up there with the polio vaccine as far as
making my job easier," says a director. There is another hilarious
quote that Viagra "has brought an industrial level of quality control
to a business that is notoriously vulnerable to the whims of biology."
That’s a great line.
It says here, even the best porn actor can have an off day. One
actor says he uses Viagra whenever a scene lasts for more than an
hour or if he has to use a condom because he just can’t work with
them. Yet another actor, a 34-year-old, uses the drug if he has to
perform intimate acts when he’s not in the mood or tired or sick that
day.
The top porn film studios turn out more than 30 films a month --
that’s one a day. So you can see how Viagra could push up
production and make it possible to keep up a film a day schedule.
Wow!
Source: Los Angeles Times, July 6, 2001
Copyright© 1994-2000 HealthCentral.com.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
To which I responded ---
Note the line, above, that said:
"Of course, we know what the drug is supposed to
be used for, but I'm afraid it has become a recreational
drug."
Some of you in these groups may remember that I predicted that
Viagra would lead to a NEW Sexual Revolution for many of the SAME
people who enjoyed the FIRST one so much. I'm happy to see that it
seems to be turning out that way.
Just ANOTHER thing that can ruin the whole day of the RRR Cult's
control-freaks. (Anything that accomplishes THAT is GOOD! I *LOVE*
it!!)
-- Craig Chilton
And THEN, **THIS** verification that the new Sex revolution is
INDEED underway ---
From NBC Nightly News -- Thanksgiving Day, 2003 ---
Doctors Blame Fewer Sexual Taboos on
a Little Blue Pill: Viagra.
Reported by NBC's Fred Francis
NOTE: To see this report, for as long as it's on their website,
go to: http://www.msnbc.com/news/998849.asp?0sl=-10
and click on "Play Video." The transcript of the report is
NOT yet posted there, as this is written, so I transcribed the
report below from a tape I made of last night's broadcast.

November 27, 2003 --
The Center for Disease Control says that people over 50
represent 12% of all new AIDS cases in this country, and yet,
many don't think they're at risk.
The reason -- fewer sexual taboos. And, say many
doctors, that little blue pill. Viagra has led to more sexual
freedom.
"It makes you feel alive! And it *stimulates* you! And if
you knew what was goin' on behind doors with us senior
citizens... WOW!" [ -- Unidentified but very enthusiastic
man who appeared to be around 60.]
74-year-old Sue Saunders knows. She has the virus.
And calls many older Viagra users, "Condominium Casanovas."
[She said:] "Going from Marge one night to Carolyn the
next night, Suzie the next night... take Betty on a cruise...
go over and eat pie with Joanie -- man!! THESE guys are
ACTIVE!
Sue *and* Cheryl say their parteners *refuse* to wear
condoms. [Cheryl repeats what her partner said to her
about that:] "What do I need a condom for? [You] can't
get pregnant."
[ ... ]
[A female doctor was identified by name, but it was a
name she probably was given when she lived in India, and
I was unable to guess at its spelling. The reporter said:]
"Infectious disease practice is full of new virus cases... many
were by Viagra users." [Doctor said:] "We have seen the
surge of HIV among the older population -- more so since
these enhancing dugs have come out."
Florida is trying to end the surge with education... 74-year-
old marilyn brand is known around Palm Beach as "the
condom granny." [She's shown holding up a condom in
front of a classroom of seniors, saying, "These now come
in colors..." One of her students asks, "Do you have any
*samples?*" The class laughs.] Marilyn has a basketful of
samples, and much frank advice, but it will be another year
before new statistics are out, before doctors will know if
these educational programs are working.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
People increasingly are learning that their BEST shot at
enjoying recreational/casual sex WITHOUT consequences
is by practicing Safe Sex well. So NBC just did seniors a
great service by reminding them that this is JUST important
for *them*!
UNTIL seniors have learned that sufficiently, the RRR cult's
"consequences-freaks" can hatefully drool over that AIDS rate.
But as seniors learn, that will probably taper off dramatically.
Then the RRR cult's loons will probably start wailing and
moaning again about the supposed decline of "morality."
To which I say to them: TOUGH!!! The Dark Ages of
sexual repression are EXTINCT.

-- Craig Chilton

User: "Marie A."
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	03 Dec 2003 07:10:59 PM

(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3fcc8fa5.45822572@netnews.mchsi.com>...
Killer Chilton, Viagra is a quite dangerous drug, particularly for
those over 40. If you furnish me with an address or some sort of drop
shipment location, I'll be happy to make a few phone calls and have
about six tons of the stuff shipped to you. I'll investigate if it
comes in triple-strength tablets.
Cordially, Marie
.

User: "james g. keegan jr."
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	03 Dec 2003 07:27:50 PM

(Marie A.) wrote in
news:85f06f0c.0312031710.2431893f@posting.google.com:

xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message
news:<3fcc8fa5.45822572@netnews.mchsi.com>...

Killer Chilton, Viagra is a quite dangerous drug, particularly
for those over 40. If you furnish me with an address or some
sort of drop shipment location, I'll be happy to make a few
phone calls and have about six tons of the stuff shipped to
you. I'll investigate if it comes in triple-strength tablets.

another 'pro-life' hypocrite.
by the way marie/cleopatra, how would you characterize your
blatant lie described in the appended post?
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Didn't you know? Pregnancy doesn't cause a bleeding
uterus either.
From: "james g. keegan jr." <keegan@nycap.rr.com>
References: <ja6wb.284807$Tr4.876082@attbi_s03>
<vs5kg6hk3g3v9e@corp.supernews.com>
<1dc521ed.0311250855.3fa5d67b@posting.google.com>
Organization: t.s.a.k.c.
Message-ID: <Xns943ED0EA446A7keegannycaprrcom@24.24.2.166>
User-Agent: Xnews/06.07.17
Lines: 17
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 01:32:15 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.29.53.83
X-Complaints-To:

X-Trace: twister.nyroc.rr.com 1069810335 24.29.53.83 (Tue, 25 Nov
2003 20:32:15 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:32:15 EST
LetEmEatWMDs@yahoo.com (Marie A.) wrote in
news:1dc521ed.0311250855.3fa5d67b@posting.google.com:

Uh, sir/madam, please keep top posting! It will get your
comments read as opposed to them being buried six pages deep
into a thread nobody is going to bother scrolling down into.
Those who complain about the practice, like this Keegan twit,
also complain about snipping

since i have been posting in this newsgroup since it was created,
you should be able to find one instance of my complaining about
snipping, right?
of course if you are just blatantly lying again, you need not
respond with such evidence.
*chuckle*
.

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	03 Dec 2003 07:37:46 PM

On 3 Dec 2003 17:10:59 -0800,
Marie A. <LetMeEatManure@yahoo.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[ ... ]

Viagra is a quite dangerous drug, particularly for those over 40.

BULLCRAP, "Marie," which you constantly prove you are
FILLED with.
If that were true, the FDA would ban it.

If you furnish me with an address or some sort of drop
shipment location, I'll be happy to make a few phone calls
and have about six tons of the stuff shipped to you. I'll
investigate if it comes in triple-strength tablets.

Fine, loser. I'm only 62 and so have no need for it. But if that
ever changes, I'll let you know. And then you can prove *again*
what a LIAR you are when you don't deliver.
-- Craig Chilton

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 05:37:42 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 01:37:46 GMT,

(Craig Chilton)
wrote:
[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!
.

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 06:45:24 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 06:37:42 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:
[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)
(LOL)
-- Craig Chilton

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 07:36:43 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:45:24 GMT,

(Craig Chilton)
wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 06:37:42 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

-- Craig Chilton

User: "Patrick Humphrey"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 07:51:37 AM

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> writes:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:45:24 GMT,

(Craig Chilton)
wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 06:37:42 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:
[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)
(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

Growing old isn't optional. Acting old is.
;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
.

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 07:59:23 AM

On 04 Dec 2003 07:51:37 -0600, Patrick Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> writes:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:45:24 GMT,

(Craig Chilton)
wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 06:37:42 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

Growing old isn't optional. Acting old is.

So I've heard.

;-)

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 07:53:37 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:36:43 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

Neat! Works for me!
(BTW -- during the last century, I looked toward the year 2000
with a mixture of anticipation and trepidation: What would that
futuristic year be like? And, DAMN!! I'll be 59 by then! Too old
to enjoy it!!
Imagine my surpise to find that at 59, the, and 62 now, I'm
just as active as I was at 30, FEEL 30, and am having even more
FUN than I did at 30!
I suppose there's SOME point at which aging changes all that,
but my parent reached their late 80s and I don't think either of
'em ever reached it!
The fact that 62 is so much like 30 is probably the best-kept
secret my age group holds back from the younger generations.
I wish someone had told me this when I was in my 20s and 30s.
I'd have had nothing to worry about!)
BTW -- there's even an ADVANTAGE to this... additional decades
of gaining knowledge. When I re-write my strategy book against the
Anti-Choicers, it'll contain far MORE facts and tactics than the one
in 1992 did!
-- Craig Chilton

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 07:58:49 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:53:37 GMT,

(Craig Chilton)
wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:36:43 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

I hope that I feel like thirty when I am sixty-two. At thirty, I
sometimes I feel like I am sixty-two. I suppose it's all in the
attitude, eh?

I suppose there's SOME point at which aging changes all that,
but my parent reached their late 80s and I don't think either of
'em ever reached it!

The fact that 62 is so much like 30 is probably the best-kept
secret my age group holds back from the younger generations.
I wish someone had told me this when I was in my 20s and 30s.
I'd have had nothing to worry about!)

You've given me something to look *forward* to, Craig.

BTW -- there's even an ADVANTAGE to this... additional decades
of gaining knowledge.

That I look forward to. I have a long way to go, but at least I am
striving towards that direction. ;-)

When I re-write my strategy book against the
Anti-Choicers, it'll contain far MORE facts and tactics than the one
in 1992 did!

I am looking forward to it. And when I read it, I'll smile, for
obvious reasons.

-- Craig Chilton

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 08:26:39 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:58:49 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

I hope that I feel like thirty when I am sixty-two. At thirty, I
sometimes I feel like I am sixty-two. I suppose it's all in the
attitude, eh?

Actually, when I was 28, I had a time like that. My lower back went
out such that I could just barely walk. Had to see a chiropractor for
weeks to get it back to normal. During that time, I REALLY felt like I'd
gone over the hill. (Back's been FINE ever since, though!)

You've given me something to look *forward* to, Craig.

Yep. Turns out there's NOTHING fearsome about being
in one's '60s!

BTW -- there's even an ADVANTAGE to this... additional
decades of gaining knowledge.

That I look forward to. I have a long way to go, but at least I
am striving towards that direction. ;-)

And when you're my age, you STILL will be. There's an infinity
of things none of us will ever live long enough to learn!

When I re-write my strategy book against the Anti-Choicers,
it'll contain far MORE facts and tactics than the one in 1992
did!

I am looking forward to it. And when I read it, I'll smile, for
obvious reasons.

I'll bet! The '92 one was hard-hitting, but this next one
will be DEVASTATING to them! Already in progress!
-- Craig Chilton

User: "HateFeminism"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 04:04:30 PM

Craig Chilton wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:58:49 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

[...]

When I re-write my strategy book against the Anti-Choicers,
it'll contain far MORE facts and tactics than the one in 1992
did!

I am looking forward to it. And when I read it, I'll smile, for
obvious reasons.

I'll bet! The '92 one was hard-hitting, but this next one
will be DEVASTATING to them! Already in progress!

Let's hope you produce more arguments to support your position than you do
in your Usenet postings. A coherent attempt at refuting some of Francis
Beckwith's arguments would do your credibility some good, although I
wouldn't expect it since you're evidently utterly incapable of that
approach.
No; I expect another self-published pile of masturbatory garbage, such as
what we see in your newsgroup rantings, targetting the weak-minded, and
utterly embarrassing to the more intelligent pro-aborts on this newsgroup
such as your good friend Pillsbury.
.

User: "Sneechres"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	05 Dec 2003 12:04:21 AM

HateFeminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote in message news:<3FCFAF6E.D9F2DD2@now.org>...

Craig Chilton wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:58:49 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

[...]

When I re-write my strategy book against the Anti-Choicers,
it'll contain far MORE facts and tactics than the one in 1992
did!

I am looking forward to it. And when I read it, I'll smile, for
obvious reasons.

I'll bet! The '92 one was hard-hitting, but this next one
will be DEVASTATING to them! Already in progress!

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn. As far as I can
tell, no one ever has. From what I can tell, they have the last word
so far.

No; I expect another self-published pile of masturbatory garbage, such as
what we see in your newsgroup rantings, targetting the weak-minded, and
utterly embarrassing to the more intelligent pro-aborts on this newsgroup
such as your good friend Pillsbury.

The Pro-Choice Victory Handbook: Strategies for Keeping Your Abortion
Rights
by Craig Chilton

List Price: $4.95
Paperback: 208 pages ; Dimensions (in inches): 0.50 x 8.75 x 5.50
Publisher: Boiled Owl Pubn; (April 1992)
ISBN: 0963124803
Average Customer Review: 4 1/2 stars Based on 3 reviews. Write a
review.
Amazon.com Sales Rank: 785,091
It's the Economy, Stupid, March 2, 2000
Reviewer: Pat Reader (see more about me) from Greensboro, NC USA
Pass this book by if you want thoughtful analysis. Apparently, Mr.
Chilton thinks the 1992 elections were about abortion. It is amazing
in hindsight how silly that idea seems. This blinded focus undermines
much of the book. Further, Mr. Chilton could stand to tone down his
purple prose. Stick to the facts!
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0963124803/qid=1070603968/sr=1-4/ref=sr_1_4/104-4497985-8620726?v=glance&s=books
I would have posted all of the reviews, but the other two were
Chilton's.
Notice how he doesn't even publish his own book despite the fact that
he says he's a book publisher. ???
--S
.

User: "Admin"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	05 Dec 2003 07:46:23 AM

In article <3fd07504.246524@netnews.mchsi.com>

(Craig Chilton) wrote:

On 4 Dec 2003 22:04:21 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

Self-admitted bigot, "Hate Feminism" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

LOL!!! It's time, once again, I see, for us all to be
"treated" to the hateful rantings and ravings of the
hateful and unaccomplished malcontent who calls
herself, "Sneechres." Whereas "Screeches" would
have been a far more *appropriate* alias for her to
COWER behind.

[...]

When I re-write my strategy book against the Anti-Choicers,
it'll contain far MORE facts and tactics than the one in 1992
did!

I am looking forward to it. And when I read it, I'll smile, for
obvious reasons.

I'll bet! The '92 one was hard-hitting, but this next one
will be DEVASTATING to them! Already in progress!

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn. As far as I can
tell, no one ever has. From what I can tell, they have the last word
so far.

The Pro-Choice Victory Handbook: Strategies for Keeping Your Abortion
Rights
by Craig Chilton

List Price: $4.95

Paperback: 208 pages ; Dimensions (in inches): 0.50 x 8.75 x 5.50
Publisher: Boiled Owl Pubn; (April 1992)
ISBN: 0963124803
Average Customer Review: 4 1/2 stars Based on 3 reviews. Write a
review.

Amazon.com Sales Rank: 785,091

It's the Economy, Stupid, March 2, 2000
Reviewer: Pat Reader (see more about me) from Greensboro, NC USA
Pass this book by if you want thoughtful analysis. Apparently, Mr.
Chilton thinks the 1992 elections were about abortion. It is amazing
in hindsight how silly that idea seems. This blinded focus undermines
much of the book. Further, Mr. Chilton could stand to tone down his
purple prose. Stick to the facts!

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0963124803/qid=1070603968/sr=1-4/ref=sr_1_4/104-4497985-8620726?v=glance&s=books

I would have posted all of the reviews, but the other two were
Chilton's.
Notice how he doesn't even publish his own book despite the fact that
he says he's a book publisher. ???

--S

-- Craig Chilton

Zzzz.
.

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	05 Dec 2003 06:40:01 AM

On 4 Dec 2003 22:04:21 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

Self-admitted bigot, "Hate Feminism" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

When I re-write my strategy book against the Anti-Choicers,
it'll contain far MORE facts and tactics than the one in 1992
did!

I am looking forward to it. And when I read it, I'll smile, for
obvious reasons.

I'll bet! The '92 one was hard-hitting, but this next one
will be DEVASTATING to them! Already in progress!

Beckwith is an anomaly: an Anti-Choicer with a brain.
Unfortunately, it's going to waste, due to his enamourment with
bigotry.

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn. As far as I can
tell, no one ever has. From what I can tell, they have the last word
so far.

Bring 'em on, if they feel so inclined. Might prove interesting.

No; I expect another self-published pile of masturbatory garbage, ...

ROTFL!!! Why the term, "self-published?" Because you think that's
derogatory, no doubt. That's the way you think. Many very accomplished
authors, BTW, are self-published ones, such as that one, Lesko, that you
rave about. In my case, I'm a book publisher who has some titles of his
own along WITH titles we've published that are written by other authors.
One of those that's been doing very well (came out just this spring, and
now is going into its third printing already -- has a worldwide audience)
is the second book of our series of biographies of the stars of the
former grunge rock band, "Alice In Chains." Entitled, "Layne Staley:
Angry Chair," by Adriana Rubio, who lives in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

...such as what we see in your newsgroup rantings, targetting the
weak-minded, ....

LOL!!!! I don't "target" you Anti-Choicers. I chastize you for
your selfish hatefulness toward women.

...and utterly embarrassing to the more intelligent [Pro-Choicers]
on this newsgroup such as your good friend Pillsbury.

No person who lives in denial of the relevant FACTS (**all** of
which support being PRO-Choice) is a Pro-Choicer.

The Pro-Choice Victory Handbook: Strategies for Keeping
Your Abortion Rights --by Craig Chilton

List Price: $4.95

Paperback: 208 pages ; Dimensions (in inches): 0.50 x 8.75 x 5.50
Publisher: Boiled Owl Pubn; (April 1992)
ISBN: 0963124803
Average Customer Review: 4 1/2 stars [out of a possible 5.]
Amazon.com Sales Rank: [Varies]

"It's the Economy, Stupid," March 2, 2000
Reviewer: Pat Reader (see more about me) from Greensboro, NC USA
Pass this book by if you want thoughtful analysis. Apparently, Mr.
Chilton thinks the 1992 elections were about abortion. It is amazing
in hindsight how silly that idea seems. This blinded focus undermines
much of the book. Further, Mr. Chilton could stand to tone down his
purple prose. Stick to the facts!

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0963124803/qid=1070603968/sr=1-4/ref=sr_1_4/104-4497985-8620726?v=glance&s=books
I would have posted all of the reviews, but the other two were
Chilton's.

That's a LIE. Authors and publishers can't have Amazon-
acknowledged ratings in reviews of their own books. One of
them (with a rating of 5 stars) quotes some of what I've said,
so I'll omit it.
YOU crassly omitted the OTHER 5-star one, which makes dog
meat of your own hateful ravings:
"Chilton is extremely insightful, marshals arguments well." June 13, 1999
Reviewer: A reader
Craig Chilton is one of the most insightful writers currently working in
America. This is the most concise pro-choice argument in print. Few
writers can match Chilton for brevity and precision.

Notice how he doesn't even publish his own book despite the
fact that he says he's a book publisher. ???

ROTFL!!!! "Boiled Owl Publications" is merely ANOTHER of the book
publishing companies that I own. The titles that IT publishes are ones
that oppose the RRR cultists. We gave the publishing company that name
because we make 'em madder than boiled owls by tearing up their agendas
and exposing their hypocrisies.
Back to your drawing board, loser. I have no doubt we'll be hearing
more of your pitiful whines soon.
-- Craig Chilton

User: "Sneechres"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	05 Dec 2003 10:14:27 PM

(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3fd37afb.1773898@netnews.mchsi.com>...

On 4 Dec 2003 22:04:21 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

Self-admitted bigot, "Hate Feminism" wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

LOL!!! It's time, once again, I see, for us all to be
"treated"

I wasn't aware that my postings were subject to time intervals. Sure,
I take time out occasionally to complete other more important
projects, but I didn't think they were scheduled.

to the hateful

Anyone who disagrees with you hates you, Craig.

rantings and ravings

As opposed to your highly-nuanced and delicately phrased scholarly
exegeses?
LOL.
Your writings reflect a total lack of education in the field of
writing. So you can hardly complain about others.
of the

hateful and unaccomplished malcontent

I am very content, thanks.
who calls

herself, "Sneechres."

Is there something wrong with what I call myself?

Whereas "Screeches" would
have been a far more *appropriate* alias for her to
COWER behind.

Wow, how creatively original. Still can't cope with being corrected,
I see.

When I re-write my strategy book against the Anti-Choicers,
it'll contain far MORE facts and tactics than the one in 1992
did!

I am looking forward to it. And when I read it, I'll smile, for
obvious reasons.

I'll bet! The '92 one was hard-hitting, but this next one
will be DEVASTATING to them! Already in progress!

Beckwith is an anomaly: an Anti-Choicer with a brain.

Actually, Alcorn accomplishes the same goals. But their having a
brain is why you can't hope to compete with either one of them. Nor
can you answer their arguments.

Unfortunately, it's going to waste, due to his enamourment with
bigotry.

"Enamourment" is not a word.
Bigotry is a meaningless word.
Try again.

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn. As far as I can
tell, no one ever has. From what I can tell, they have the last word
so far.

Bring 'em on, if they feel so inclined. Might prove interesting.

Their writings can be found at Amazon. Read and refute.

No; I expect another self-published pile of masturbatory garbage, ...

ROTFL!!! Why the term, "self-published?"

Because no one else will touch it.

Because you think that's
derogatory, no doubt.

It can be.
That's the way you think. Many very accomplished

authors, BTW, are self-published ones, such as that one, Lesko, that you
rave about.

You're not in the same league. (PS: Notice the average customer
ratings of Lesko's books.)
In my case, I'm a book publisher who has some titles of his

own along WITH titles we've published that are written by other authors.
One of those that's been doing very well (came out just this spring, and
now is going into its third printing already -- has a worldwide audience)
is the second book of our series of biographies of the stars of the
former grunge rock band, "Alice In Chains." Entitled, "Layne Staley:
Angry Chair," by Adriana Rubio, who lives in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Maybe you should read the Amazon reviews about the Angry Chair book
before you get too excited. Not a single book you've ever written or
published would make so much as the outdoor five-dollar sale rack at
Borders.

...such as what we see in your newsgroup rantings, targetting the
weak-minded, ....

LOL!!!! I don't "target" you Anti-Choicers. I chastize you for
your selfish hatefulness toward women.

With "friends" like you I hardly think women need enemies.

...and utterly embarrassing to the more intelligent [Pro-Choicers]
on this newsgroup such as your good friend Pillsbury.

No person who lives in denial of the relevant FACTS (**all** of
which support being PRO-Choice) is a Pro-Choicer.

Amazon.com Sales Rank: [has never broken six hundred thousand]

"It's the Economy, Stupid," March 2, 2000
Reviewer: Pat Reader (see more about me) from Greensboro, NC USA
Pass this book by if you want thoughtful analysis. Apparently, Mr.
Chilton thinks the 1992 elections were about abortion. It is amazing
in hindsight how silly that idea seems. This blinded focus undermines
much of the book. Further, Mr. Chilton could stand to tone down his
purple prose. Stick to the facts!

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0963124803/qid=1070603968/sr=1-4/ref=sr_1_4/104-4497985-8620726?v=glance&s=books

I would have posted all of the reviews, but the other two were
Chilton's.

That's a LIE.

No, it's not. Your style is all too easily identified. The third one
is so obviously you it's impossible to miss. The second one isn't
attributed to anyone and so could be either you or one of your
pathetic friends (if a ***** like you even has any friends).

Authors and publishers can't have Amazon-
acknowledged ratings in reviews of their own books.

What are you talking about???

One of
them (with a rating of 5 stars) quotes some of what I've said,
so I'll omit it.

Omit what? From what?

YOU crassly omitted the OTHER 5-star one, which makes dog
meat of your own hateful ravings:

No it doesn't, because YOU WROTE IT. No one would ever say those
things about you, specifically, "Craig Chilton is one of the most
insightful writers currently working in America." AS IF.
Either that or you got one of your "non-RRR cult" friends to write it
for you.

"Chilton is extremely insightful, marshals arguments well." June 13, 1999

Reviewer: A reader

That clears that up. No city? No name? No credibility.

Craig Chilton is one of the most insightful writers currently working in
America. This is the most concise pro-choice argument in print. Few
writers can match Chilton for brevity and precision.

LMAO! Delusional to the tenth power.
Your "book" is ten years old, no one has ever heard about it, it's
about to break the eight hundred thousand ranking, your other book is
a fraud first written a quarter of a century ago, and you think you're
"one of the most insightful writers currently working in America?
*****, YOU AREN'T CURRENTLY WORKING! And you sure a ***** aren't
insightful insofar as you can't see beyond your own rectal cavity.
Brevity and precision? You've never heard of either one as proven in
your amazingly long-winded and poorly-organized rants here on Usenet.
They're the very picture of someone who has never bothered to take so
much as Basic Composition at your local community college.
It's unbelievable the lengths you'll go to to make yourself look good.
Apparently no one ever told you that the more outrageous the lies you
tell, the fewer chances you'll have of being believed.
Of course, then there's your inevitable denials, which were covered
nicely by Otto von Bismarck.

Notice how he doesn't even publish his own book despite the
fact that he says he's a book publisher. ???

ROTFL!!!! "Boiled Owl Publications" is merely ANOTHER of the book
publishing companies that I own.

No wonder I've never heard of it. I was about to research it but now
I won't bother.
PS: You should have called it Boiled *****.
The titles that IT publishes are ones

that oppose the RRR cultists.

Correction, TITLE, as in singular. Amazon lists exactly one, and we
can guess which one that is.
--S
.

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	05 Dec 2003 10:53:27 PM

On 5 Dec 2003 20:14:27 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> ...

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

(... Mean-spirited and hateful wretch that she is, spewed a
hate-filled diatribe in which EVERY derogatory thing she said
about me was a total lie.
No surprise for a person having no credibility.
I'll just retain ONE telling part of this post... the rest of what
she said being trashy and lying TRIPE.) ---
Referring to one of my books, "The Pro-Choice VICTORY
Handbook," you copied its ONLY negative review in Amazon,
into your post, but...

YOU crassly omitted the OTHER 5-star one, which makes dog
meat of your own hateful ravings:

No it doesn't, because YOU WROTE IT. No one would ever
say those things about you, specifically, "Craig Chilton is one of the
most insightful writers currently working in America." AS IF.

Either that or you got one of your "non-RRR cult" friends to write it
for you.

And NEITHER is true. I have no idea who wrote it. (But I think that
it was a very neat opinion! :) )

"Chilton is extremely insightful, marshals arguments well."
June 13, 1999

Reviewer: A reader

That clears that up. No city? No name? No credibility.

Yep. That clears things up REALLY well.
"Sneechres:" No city. Phony name. ZIP credibility.
-- Craig Chilton

User: "Sneechres"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	06 Dec 2003 05:15:29 PM

(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3fda5d90.9421074@netnews.mchsi.com>...

On 5 Dec 2003 20:14:27 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> ...

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

(... Mean-spirited and hateful wretch that she is,

That's what happens when you disagree with God, I mean, Craig.
spewed a

hate-filled diatribe in which EVERY derogatory thing she said
about me was a total lie.

Nothing I said about you was a lie. YOU'RE the liar and it's been
proven. and you HATE the fact that your wild and overblown stories
are too unrealistic to be taken seriously.

No surprise for a person having no credibility.

You problem is that I DO have credibility.

I'll just retain ONE telling part of this post...

The entire thing was telling; you snip that which you are unwilling
or unable to deal with.
the rest of what

she said being trashy and lying TRIPE.) ---

Referring to one of my books, "The Pro-Choice VICTORY
Handbook," you copied its ONLY negative review in Amazon,
into your post, but...

Of course I did. It was the only one that had a name and city
attached that YOU didn't write yourself. Out of the three reviews, it
was the only one worth considering.

YOU crassly omitted the OTHER 5-star one, which makes dog
meat of your own hateful ravings:

No it doesn't, because YOU WROTE IT. No one would ever
say those things about you, specifically, "Craig Chilton is one of the
most insightful writers currently working in America." AS IF.

Either that or you got one of your "non-RRR cult" friends to write it
for you.

And NEITHER is true.

They're both obviously true. Anyone with half a working brain can see
it for themselves.

I have no idea who wrote it.

Considering how many other things you've lied about, I have no
intention of granting you the benefit of the doubt.

(But I think that
it was a very neat opinion! :) )

If course you do. Considering that it has no basis in reality, that
is.

"Chilton is extremely insightful, marshals arguments well."
June 13, 1999

Reviewer: A reader

That clears that up. No city? No name? No credibility.

Yep. That clears things up REALLY well.

"Sneechres:" No city.

Somewhere in Seattle.

Phony name.

No, Sneechres is my name.

ZIP credibility.

Not for you to decide.
--S
.

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	06 Dec 2003 09:17:41 PM

On 6 Dec 2003 15:15:29 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> ...

LIE-**filled** hate rant by macontent "Sneechres"
snipped. A pile of pure bilge.
[ ... ]

No city? No name? No credibility.

Yep. That clears things up REALLY well.

"Sneechres:" No city.

Somewhere in Seattle.

Phony name.

No, Sneechres is my name.

ZIP credibility.

Not for you to decide.

Naw. You just keep right on *proving* your lack of it.
-- Craig Chilton

User: "Sneechres"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	07 Dec 2003 01:10:33 AM

(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3fde99e1.7235652@netnews.mchsi.com>...

On 6 Dec 2003 15:15:29 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> ...

LIE-**filled** hate rant by macontent "Sneechres"
snipped. A pile of pure bilge.

What are you flapping about now?

No city? No name? No credibility.

Yep. That clears things up REALLY well.

"Sneechres:" No city.

Somewhere in Seattle.

Phony name.

No, Sneechres is my name.

ZIP credibility.

Not for you to decide.

Naw.

Yah. You've been caught lying here enough times that you can't say
anything about anyone's credibility.
--S
.

User: "Ray Fischer"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	05 Dec 2003 09:20:22 PM

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn.

Been there - done that. Beckwith is easy to refute.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Sneechres"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	06 Dec 2003 05:16:34 PM

(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bqrhtm$ak9$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn.

Been there - done that. Beckwith is easy to refute.

Feel free to point us toward these refutations.
--S
.

User: "Ray Fischer"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	06 Dec 2003 07:36:15 PM

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bqrhtm$ak9$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn.

Been there - done that. Beckwith is easy to refute.

Feel free to point us toward these refutations.

www.google.com
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Sneechres"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	07 Dec 2003 01:21:43 AM

(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bqu06e$6ea$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bqrhtm$ak9$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn.

Been there - done that. Beckwith is easy to refute.

Feel free to point us toward these refutations.

www.google.com

Um, they don't have what you seem to be referring to. I found a lot
of Frank's writings, his webpage, lots of Christians and anti-abortion
people supporting him, and a few Bahai and atheist people who looked
like they were grumpy with him over some religious doctrine or
something.
I went about two or three pages into two different keyword searches.
You're going to have to post specifically what you are talking about.
Unless, of course, it exists only in your moth-eaten skull.
--S
.

User: "Ray Fischer"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	07 Dec 2003 05:15:57 PM

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bqu06e$6ea$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bqrhtm$ak9$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn.

Been there - done that. Beckwith is easy to refute.

Feel free to point us toward these refutations.

www.google.com

Um, they don't have what you seem to be referring to.

Ask an adult for help.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "Sneechres"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	07 Dec 2003 11:57:12 PM

(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<br0cbc$2ve$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bqu06e$6ea$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bqrhtm$ak9$1@bolt.sonic.net>...

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:

He should try refuting both Beckwith and Alcorn.

Been there - done that. Beckwith is easy to refute.

Feel free to point us toward these refutations.

www.google.com

Um, they don't have what you seem to be referring to.

Ask an adult for help.

Well, I guess that's why you couldn't help me when I asked, big baby.
Oh well.
--S
.

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 07:38:21 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:45:24 GMT,

(Craig Chilton)
wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 06:37:42 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)
I do recollect that you mentioned having been in the freedom fighting
sector for over three decades -- prodigies like that often start very,
very young, and I just thought you were one of those. ;-)))))

-- Craig Chilton

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 08:05:26 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:38:21 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

I do recollect that you mentioned having been in the freedom
fighting sector for over three decades -- prodigies like that often
start very,very young, and I just thought you were one of those. ;-)))))

LOL!! Well, in my case not all THAT young!
Recall that abortion became legal in New York State (where I
lived at the time) in the late '50s. It had a close shave when the
legislature tried to repeal that, and it was saved only by Governor
Nelson Rockefeller... an egalitarian Republican BEFORE the RRR
cultists came along and loused up that party! -- VETOED that
measure! (All this *before* Roe vs. Wade's emancipation of ALL
American women, in 1963.) (FOUR decades ago... not three.)
That close call was MY start as a Pro-Choice activist, from
which I have never swayed. (I was in high school, then.) By
the early '60s, I was in college, and spent much of my free time
in the ranks of the Civil Rights workers, fighting for THAT cause,
in Mississippi. Where Mafioso-appearing white thugs called us
obscene names and even threatened outr lives, right out in
plain sight on the streets of downtown Jackson. (To see modern
Jackson, you'd never guessed such mind pollution ever could
have prevailed there!) It was life on the edge... and I **LOVED**
watching those hateful losers DO just that: LOSE!
Just as much as I'm loving it as the mindless bigotry and hate
of the Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists/homophobes' agendas circle
the Drain of Extinction!
-- Craig Chilton

User: "Krisblake"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 08:16:55 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 14:05:26 GMT,

(Craig Chilton)
wrote:

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:38:21 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

I do recollect that you mentioned having been in the freedom
fighting sector for over three decades -- prodigies like that often
start very,very young, and I just thought you were one of those. ;-)))))

LOL!! Well, in my case not all THAT young!

(Sorry, I meant to cancel the earlier response, as I forget to add the
second part in.)

Recall that abortion became legal in New York State (where I
lived at the time) in the late '50s. It had a close shave when the
legislature tried to repeal that, and it was saved only by Governor
Nelson Rockefeller... an egalitarian Republican BEFORE the RRR
cultists came along and loused up that party! -- VETOED that
measure! (All this *before* Roe vs. Wade's emancipation of ALL
American women, in 1963.) (FOUR decades ago... not three.)

That close call was MY start as a Pro-Choice activist, from
which I have never swayed. (I was in high school, then.) By
the early '60s, I was in college, and spent much of my free time
in the ranks of the Civil Rights workers, fighting for THAT cause,
in Mississippi. Where Mafioso-appearing white thugs called us
obscene names and even threatened outr lives, right out in
plain sight on the streets of downtown Jackson. (To see modern
Jackson, you'd never guessed such mind pollution ever could
have prevailed there!) It was life on the edge... and I **LOVED**
watching those hateful losers DO just that: LOSE!

Admirable.

Just as much as I'm loving it as the mindless bigotry and hate
of the Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists/homophobes' agendas circle
the Drain of Extinction!

Keep up the exemplary work, Craig!
.

User: "Craig Chilton"
Title: Re: LOL!!! Just as I Predicted: Sex Revolution #2 has ARRIVED!!	04 Dec 2003 08:35:17 AM

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:16:55 -0500,
Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

Krisblake <Krisblakemy2luvs@aol.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <

> wrote:

[ ...]

Fine, loser. I'm only 62...

No way!

YES way! (Sheesh, Kris! Did you think
I was some sort of OLD fart or somethin'?)

(LOL)

I thought you were **younger**, you OLD fart. ;-)

I do recollect that you mentioned having been in the freedom
fighting sector for over three decades -- prodigies like that often
start very,very young, and I just thought you were one of those. ;-)))))

LOL!! Well, in my case not all THAT young!

(Sorry, I meant to cancel the earlier response, as I forget to
add the second part in.)

No prob!
Speaking of cancels -- I mixed up a couple of years in a version of
this last post I put up, so I revised it so that it was correct, and then
cancelled the first one. So if you keep posts on your newsreader,
you can just delete that one, to avoid the confusion.)

...By the early '60s, I was in college, and spent much of my free time
time in the ranks of the Civil Rights workers, fighting for THAT cause,
in Mississippi. Where Mafioso-appearing white thugs called us
obscene names and even threatened outr lives, right out in
plain sight on the streets of downtown Jackson. (To see modern
Jackson, you'd never guessed such mind pollution ever could
have prevailed there!) It was life on the edge... and I **LOVED**
watching those hateful losers DO just that: LOSE!

Admirable.

Thanks. Just remember, there were many THOUSANDS of
such activists.

Just as much as I'm loving it as the mindless bigotry and hate
of the Anti-Choicers/RRR cultists/homophobes' agendas circle
the Drain of Extinction!

Keep up the exemplary work, Craig!

Thanks. You too! You're giving some real fits to the
bigots in here!
-- Craig Chilton