Religions > Bible > "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
04 Oct 2005 05:11:42 PM |
| Object: |
"Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
04 Oct 2005 10:23:56 PM |
|
|
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Llanzlan Klazmon" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
04 Oct 2005 11:31:15 PM |
|
|
"Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in news:9HH0f.70
$FD5.1448@news.uswest.net:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
Well PD certainly hasn't addressed any of the scientific evidence Budikka
has been posting references for.
Klazmon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
05 Oct 2005 11:18:18 AM |
|
|
Llanzlan Klazmon wrote:
"Richard Dawkins" <Richard_Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in news:9HH0f.70
$FD5.1448@news.uswest.net:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
Well PD certainly hasn't addressed any of the scientific evidence Budikka
has been posting references for.
Klazmon.
===>The fake "pastor" is just an ignorant nitwit.
He is incapable of answering any REAL issues of questions. -- L.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
05 Oct 2005 11:16:59 AM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
===>WHAT "pastor"???
That ignorant "pastor" Dave?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "rogue" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
05 Oct 2005 03:26:30 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
JERRY
No, I've seen Dave run many, many times from my own arguments. Dave
spends the majority of his time making comments he can't back up and
then running away from the debate. It's his one true pattern of action.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
07 Oct 2005 06:14:23 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
Let's review this:
Pastor Dave insists there is no so-called macroevolution.
I ask him to define what he means by that term.
-He runs away.
I ask him what he will accept as proof.
-He runs away.
I ask him to scientifically define "kind" so I can give him examples of
evolution transcending "kind".
-He runs away.
I ask him to scientifically define the mechanism which can prevent one
of these (undefined) "kinds" from changing into another (undefined)
"kind".
-He runs away.
I inform him many times, including many times long before he posted his
challenge on August 31st, where to find the evidence he claims doe snot
exist.
-He runs away.
He claims evolutionists will run from his challenge.
I present 542 examples or references to examples **WHICH PROVIDE THE
VERY THING HE CLAIMS DOES NOT EXIST**.
-He runs away.
I ask him to discuss these examples, as he promised to do on August
31st.
-He runs away.
Now which part of "He runs away" is it that you need Remedial Ed. on?
And what do we have here, in yoru case, you who steals the good name of
a real scientist and do nothing but give evidence of your
macro-ignorance with it? What is it that you are doing if it isn't
running away from addressing the evidence that Disaster Dave has also
repeatedly run away from?
So who is in denial here, the one who states the facts, **ME**, or the
one who avoids the facts and runs away **YOU** and Disaster Dave?
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseki" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
05 Oct 2005 12:44:36 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
You are so right. Pastor Dave doesn't really run, he just ignores
anyone that answers his questions. He has repeatly been shown wrong,
but continues to reply to the peanut gallery.
I personally would have phrased it (Keep sucking donkey dongs Pastor
Dave), but that would have been insulting to donkeys.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
05 Oct 2005 09:19:50 PM |
|
|
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128534276.699908.24920@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
You are so right. Pastor Dave doesn't really run, he just ignores
anyone that answers his questions. He has repeatly been shown wrong,
but continues to reply to the peanut gallery.
How has he run?
No one has posted a cogent question worthy of answering?
I personally would have phrased it (Keep sucking donkey dongs Pastor
Dave), but that would have been insulting to donkeys.
You are probably 13 right?
At least mentally that is :0)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
07 Oct 2005 06:15:29 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128534276.699908.24920@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
You are so right. Pastor Dave doesn't really run, he just ignores
anyone that answers his questions. He has repeatly been shown wrong,
but continues to reply to the peanut gallery.
How has he run?
No one has posted a cogent question worthy of answering?
I personally would have phrased it (Keep sucking donkey dongs Pastor
Dave), but that would have been insulting to donkeys.
You are probably 13 right?
At least mentally that is :0)
At least he doesn't run away.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
06 Oct 2005 12:29:33 PM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128534276.699908.24920@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
You are so right. Pastor Dave doesn't really run, he just ignores
anyone that answers his questions. He has repeatly been shown wrong,
but continues to reply to the peanut gallery.
How has he run?
No one has posted a cogent question worthy of answering?
===>True, the only questions posted were by the "pastor",
none of which was "cogent".
He is running from the ANSWERS, not from any questions.
He is more than happy to post his inane questions. -- L.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseki" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
06 Oct 2005 11:00:18 AM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128534276.699908.24920@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
You are so right. Pastor Dave doesn't really run, he just ignores
anyone that answers his questions. He has repeatly been shown wrong,
but continues to reply to the peanut gallery.
How has he run?
No one has posted a cogent question worthy of answering?
Oh my! Let see:
from:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_thread/thread/f1d9b07f32468f25/eb12e852e4aea611
where I asked:
"Pastor" Dave misrepresented himself with:
There are ZERO experiments that can prove
macroevolution. ZERO!
Umm, I gave you four examples. Oh wait, I am sorry that was back when
when we defined "macroevolution" using the definition that everyone
outside of "Pastor" Dave uses (including IDers and creationists).
Instead we have "Pastor" Dave's classic definition by example using
outrageous examples so that he can again revise it.
Oh, by the way, you "overlooked" my earlier question. Since your
"definition" of macroevolution seems to be well beyond speciation, is
speciation now a part of microevolution and part of nature which you do
recognize as occurring?
From the same thread (which was created by "Pastor" Dave) Budikka
repeatly presents more and more evidence of "macroevolution", but
"Pastor" Dave seemingly has chosen not to respond.
In the same thread I gave him four example, in my own words (per his
request) and he only had flip comments regarding why they were not
clear demonstrationof macroevolution.
While your defense of "Pastor" Dave is remarkable, fail to see you or
our good "Pastor" as having anything worth defending.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
06 Oct 2005 08:45:52 PM |
|
|
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128614418.063536.47150@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128534276.699908.24920@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in
common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
You are so right. Pastor Dave doesn't really run, he just ignores
anyone that answers his questions. He has repeatly been shown wrong,
but continues to reply to the peanut gallery.
How has he run?
No one has posted a cogent question worthy of answering?
Oh my! Let see:
from:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_thread/thread/f1d9b07f32468f25/eb12e852e4aea611
where I asked:
"Pastor" Dave misrepresented himself with:
There are ZERO experiments that can prove
macroevolution. ZERO!
Umm, I gave you four examples. Oh wait, I am sorry that was back when
when we defined "macroevolution" using the definition that everyone
outside of "Pastor" Dave uses (including IDers and creationists).
Instead we have "Pastor" Dave's classic definition by example using
outrageous examples so that he can again revise it.
Oh, by the way, you "overlooked" my earlier question. Since your
"definition" of macroevolution seems to be well beyond speciation, is
speciation now a part of microevolution and part of nature which you do
recognize as occurring?
From the same thread (which was created by "Pastor" Dave) Budikka
repeatly presents more and more evidence of "macroevolution", but
"Pastor" Dave seemingly has chosen not to respond.
In the same thread I gave him four example, in my own words (per his
request) and he only had flip comments regarding why they were not
clear demonstrationof macroevolution.
While your defense of "Pastor" Dave is remarkable, fail to see you or
our good "Pastor" as having anything worth defending.
joseki,
What does it matter if people refer to you as either an Atheist or a
Agnostic? When half the people call you "Mongoloid" and the other half call
you "Pitifully Retarded", they are using different words which have a
similar meaning to refer to a truth that is unaltered by the selection of
the word.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joseki" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
07 Oct 2005 08:33:16 AM |
|
|
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128614418.063536.47150@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128534276.699908.24920@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in
common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
You are so right. Pastor Dave doesn't really run, he just ignores
anyone that answers his questions. He has repeatly been shown wrong,
but continues to reply to the peanut gallery.
How has he run?
No one has posted a cogent question worthy of answering?
Oh my! Let see:
from:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_thread/thread/f1d9b07f32468f25/eb12e852e4aea611
where I asked:
"Pastor" Dave misrepresented himself with:
There are ZERO experiments that can prove
macroevolution. ZERO!
Umm, I gave you four examples. Oh wait, I am sorry that was back when
when we defined "macroevolution" using the definition that everyone
outside of "Pastor" Dave uses (including IDers and creationists).
Instead we have "Pastor" Dave's classic definition by example using
outrageous examples so that he can again revise it.
Oh, by the way, you "overlooked" my earlier question. Since your
"definition" of macroevolution seems to be well beyond speciation, is
speciation now a part of microevolution and part of nature which you do
recognize as occurring?
From the same thread (which was created by "Pastor" Dave) Budikka
repeatly presents more and more evidence of "macroevolution", but
"Pastor" Dave seemingly has chosen not to respond.
In the same thread I gave him four example, in my own words (per his
request) and he only had flip comments regarding why they were not
clear demonstrationof macroevolution.
While your defense of "Pastor" Dave is remarkable, fail to see you or
our good "Pastor" as having anything worth defending.
joseki,
What does it matter if people refer to you as either an Atheist or a
Agnostic? When half the people call you "Mongoloid" and the other half call
you "Pitifully Retarded", they are using different words which have a
similar meaning to refer to a truth that is unaltered by the selection of
the word.
Rich!
Thanks so much for the kind word. I am so glad I was able to answer
your questions regarding Pator Dave's unresponsiveness. I see you have
learned well from PD. Ignore the meanngful portion of posts and merely
give completely unsubstantiated attacks. To the best of my knowledge
you are the first to use the out dated term "mongoloid" to refer to me.
The preferred current term would be Down's Syndrome sufferer or
victim.
Have a pleasant day, go luck with figuring out that random
capitalization problem.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Dawkins" |
|
| Title: Re: "Macroevolution" (Keep Running Pastor Dave) - Example 541 |
07 Oct 2005 07:48:03 PM |
|
|
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128691996.840200.107970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128614418.063536.47150@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Joseki" <joseki.BX@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1128534276.699908.24920@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Richard Dawkins wrote:
"Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1128463902.548202.264810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4204021.stm
reveals: "...genetic analyses indicated that hippos had more in
common
with cetaceans, the group to which whales and dolphins belong."
There's no explanation for this other than evolution - and
so-called
"macroevolution" on a major scale.
Budikka
Funny how you're the only twit that sees the Pastor running?
Denial maybe?
You are so right. Pastor Dave doesn't really run, he just ignores
anyone that answers his questions. He has repeatly been shown
wrong,
but continues to reply to the peanut gallery.
How has he run?
No one has posted a cogent question worthy of answering?
Oh my! Let see:
from:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_thread/thread/f1d9b07f32468f25/eb12e852e4aea611
where I asked:
"Pastor" Dave misrepresented himself with:
There are ZERO experiments that can prove
macroevolution. ZERO!
Umm, I gave you four examples. Oh wait, I am sorry that was back when
when we defined "macroevolution" using the definition that everyone
outside of "Pastor" Dave uses (including IDers and creationists).
Instead we have "Pastor" Dave's classic definition by example using
outrageous examples so that he can again revise it.
Oh, by the way, you "overlooked" my earlier question. Since your
"definition" of macroevolution seems to be well beyond speciation, is
speciation now a part of microevolution and part of nature which you do
recognize as occurring?
From the same thread (which was created by "Pastor" Dave) Budikka
repeatly presents more and more evidence of "macroevolution", but
"Pastor" Dave seemingly has chosen not to respond.
In the same thread I gave him four example, in my own words (per his
request) and he only had flip comments regarding why they were not
clear demonstrationof macroevolution.
While your defense of "Pastor" Dave is remarkable, fail to see you or
our good "Pastor" as having anything worth defending.
joseki,
What does it matter if people refer to you as either an Atheist or a
Agnostic? When half the people call you "Mongoloid" and the other half
call
you "Pitifully Retarded", they are using different words which have a
similar meaning to refer to a truth that is unaltered by the selection of
the word.
Rich!
Thanks so much for the kind word. I am so glad I was able to answer
your questions regarding Pator Dave's unresponsiveness.
You've never answered anything?
I see you have
learned well from PD. Ignore the meanngful portion of posts and merely
give completely unsubstantiated attacks.
Projection syndrome got ya I see.
To the best of my knowledge
you are the first to use the out dated term "mongoloid" to refer to me.
Ever consider the possibility that it's because you are a mongoloid?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
