Religions > Bible > No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech?
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"V" |
| Date: |
09 Jul 2007 08:35:21 AM |
| Object: |
No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
In a message dated 7/8/2007 8:43:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
wmech@bellsouth.net writes:
Your problem "V" is that you waste our time with your lengthy babble.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
Thanks for your comments wmech.
Due to the paranoia of the atheists claiming me to be a stalker, as
well as their predisposition to tell lies, I will answer all private
mail in public to document what is said.
This way, any sick minded atheist will not be able to fabricate and
spin webs from the dark recesses of their minds.
No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you
know this already wmech?
Enkidu may have said it best - "You (V) have nothing to say that we
haven't heard before, nothing to say that hasn't been say better by
others, and nothing to say that was worth hearing when said better by
others. Your pathetic little turds of truth are unoriginal,
irrational, ill-conceived, ill-received, and devoid of
value." (condensed)
All you have to do is to avoid 'V' if I have a history of not offering
anything useful to you wmech...but you know this already?
It is that simple.
Just take Enkidu's advice.
Atheists have heard it all, know it all - so why bother to read a
thing from a pathetic little turd wmech?
It isn't logical...is it wmech?
I can tell you I don't read anything turds write.
Saying a person is a problem because of the length of their post is
not a good way to live, if you wish to be at peace...but you know this
already wmech?
How peaceful would I be if I lost that peace by going around and
pulling all the books from library and criticizing them for their
length and not content...but you know this already wmech?
No, the atheist job is not to criticize for length, it is to criticize
for truth.
But alas, since atheists cannot argue against me, they set out to
destroy me.
And really, even if I was gone, atheists would have to substitute
someone or something else to hate.
For without such a fixated, delusional, mind manacled life... life for
them would not be tolerable...but you know this already wmech?
The length it takes to write what we need to get done is what it takes
and not one word less wmech.
In a nutshell, we must 'write right' for our writing efforts to be of
benefit to us....but you know this already wmech?
A good portion of people I see on online lists do not write right if
their goal is to restructure their life.
People complain my posts are too long?
Too long? Too long for who?
They are just right for me.
I write for me first and you second.
For me, my posts are just the right size.
What I would do with such a list of my complaints as yours is to print
them out and distill what needs to be changed in my life to be at
peace. There is no better roadmap for change than this...but you know
this already wmech?
I tell such critics that complain about the length or content of my
posts the same thing , "If they are too long for you or you do not
like the content - then don't read them."
I can assure such critics that restructuring one's life towards a goal
of successful living is much harder than reading a few pages.
In our own writings we are mapping out our new life, so we must take
care to produce a map that is accurate and true.
Do we ever complain a road map is too long?
We accept how the land lays and the choice of whether to proceed or
not is our only rational choice.
But to complain that the map is too long and work to artificially
change and falsify the map will lead to a failed journey.
What I write I also reread myself periodically to crystallize what
needs to be done to keep peace in my life.
This technique of 'reading and studying what we write' has a firm
grounding in historical philosophy as well. Greco - Roman
philosophers....but you know this already wmech?
Marcus Aurelius in particular, would use their own writings for such
purposes - to read their own writings as reminders of living right.
This is why they thought so highly of maxims. I think it was a fellow
named Pseudo-Isocrates that said, "For as it is the nature of the body
to be developed with appropriate exercise, it is the nature of the
soul to be developed by moral precepts."
Now, everyone does not think that precepts, maxims or parables are of
value. My atheist friend Neil for one finds them not to his liking
Neil Kelsey writes: "Theists like you (V) should be given electric
shocks every time they use parables. That is my new policy."
But, if I can avoid Neil's electric prod, I find the use maxims,
slogans, or posts of whatever length, all good supports for us to keep
us going in the right direction with our lives
In the end wmech, I can sum up all I have written with 4 words from an
old Zen master:
"Attain deliverance in disturbances."
So, make the best use out of your writing and use this roadmap as the
stepping stone to a better life through change or acceptance wmech.
And in this case, you change yourself and your thinking to accept what
is in your power to change and also to accept what you have no power
to change....but you know this already wmech?
See:
http://jesusneverexisted.org/jne/forum/index.php?topic=342.0
Take care,
V (Male)
Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
AA#2
.
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 01:35:36 PM |
|
|
"V" <vfr44@aol.com> wrotesnip
Thanks
HO! <Whack!>
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Rev Dr. Hugh Jarse NLAHN." |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 11:49:34 AM |
|
|
On Jul 9, 2:35 pm, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
Enkidu may have said it best - "You (V) have nothing to say that we
haven't heard before, nothing to say that hasn't been say better by
others, and nothing to say that was worth hearing when said better by
others. Your pathetic little turds of truth are unoriginal,
irrational, ill-conceived, ill-received, and devoid of
value." (condensed)
So, you understand what you are doing, but you are doing it anyway.
What a *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lucifer" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 08:43:57 AM |
|
|
On Jul 9, 2:35 pm, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 7/8/2007 8:43:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
w...@bellsouth.net writes:
You
HO! <Whack?
--
Lucifer the Unsubtle, EAC Librarian of Dark Tomes of Excessive Evil
and General Purpose Igor
The Anti-Theist, BAAWA Lowly Evilmeister and tamer of the Demon Duck
of Doom
Convicted by Earthquack
"Don't worry, I won't bite.......hard"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Neil Kelsey" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 11:41:55 AM |
|
|
On Jul 9, 6:35 am, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 7/8/2007 8:43:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
w...@bellsouth.net writes:
Your problem "V" is that you waste our time with your lengthy babble.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
Thanks for your comments wmech.
Due to the paranoia of the atheists claiming me to be a stalker, as
well as their predisposition to tell lies, I will answer all private
mail in public to document what is said.
This way, any sick minded atheist will not be able to fabricate and
spin webs from the dark recesses of their minds.
No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you
know this already wmech?
Ho! <whack!>
I am not in a position to criticize anyone else about babbling, and I
don't think length is a valid criticism (I hate it when someone says a
movie is too long...why go in the first place if the object is to get
it over with as quickly as possible?). However...
Your posts can usually be boiled down to "I'm offended that people
don't agree with me so I will bombard them with what pisses them off
the most, because I'm ***** at them. ***** rational discourse. In
fact, ***** discourse. This is war."
That IS much shorter.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Medusa" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 12:44:36 PM |
|
|
On Jul 9, 8:35 am, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
No, your lengthy babble is not my problem anymore because. . .
HO <whack>
Medusa
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Syd M." |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 02:36:13 PM |
|
|
On Jul 9, 9:35 am, V <v...@aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 7/8/2007 8:43:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
w...@bellsouth.net writes:
Your problem "V" is that you waste our time with your lengthy babble.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
Thanks for your
HO! <Whack>
PDW
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...butyou know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 10:28:20 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:35:21 +0000, V wrote:
Due
HO! <WHACK>
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Warned you we tried! Listen you did not! Now screwed
we will all be!"
http://www.sequentialpictures.com/moviestarwarsepisode3.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 03:39:10 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:35:21 -0000, V <vfr44@aol.com> wrote:
Your problem "V" is that you waste our time with your lengthy babble.
HO! <whack!>
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom 0" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 12:23:46 PM |
|
|
Recently, V lied about the following :
Due to the paranoia
HO <Whack>
--
Tom 0
It was morning, and I found myself mourning for a childhood that I
thought had disappeared.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...butyou know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 03:34:40 PM |
|
|
V wrote:
"HO!" *thwack*
Thanks
My pleasure
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: No, lengthy babble is not my problem...it is your problem...but you know this already wmech? |
09 Jul 2007 11:07:23 AM |
|
|
V wrote:
Tha...
HO! <Whack>
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
I am a democrat but now I know our President was right
Re: Everything you ever wanted to know about god/christ/heaven/hell/history/philosophy/science,but were afraid to ask
Yes, But, When Will You Know?
these ignorant crowds, but what do they know about it?
You only think you know Jesus but you really don't
RELIGIOUS FAITH MEANS YOU DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS A GOD BUT YOU HOPE THAT THERE IS ONE
(~) For First Sunday of Lent: Lent -- not behaviors but series of questions
(~) Funny...But True?
| Re: Kerry: NO guns for Americans, but OK for muslim terrorists
god tried to murder a child today, but slipped up
Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life: no one can come to the Father(God)(in Heaven), but by me." (John 14:6) This means that if you die without trusting in Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour you will die in your sins and be forever se
Science changed the words, then said only they're right, and God can't be mentioned... but all their FALSE gods can... in their version of CREATIONISM.
Jesus didn't fulfill Messiah or Son of Man roles very well, but theysold it anyway
Re: life is but a dream
the christian god is nothing but a SPOLIED BRAT
|
|
|
