here's a more interesting question;
why could not God have created a material
universe that was not subject gravity
and entropy?
or, is there but one type
of matter that -can- exist?
making a long story short, as far as
-you- or anyone else can tell, this
material universe is comprised of
the only possible dynamic
interplay of forces.
and so, in speaking of Creation,
in this regard, the emanation of
the material universe from nothing,
by necessity, being a conscious effort,
it remains best described as a "bringing forth"
which is why we only hear something like;
"let there -be light-"
and not;
"let me design a specific type of light
that is but one of an infinite variety
of types of electromagnetic radiations"
and still, such light is "good"
and can simply be called "good"
with no resort to 'evil' light.
that is, a "good" thing is described by the
namer of objects but an "evil" thing must
take in to account the conscious nature
of the thing itself aside from
any objective namer.
that is, light can be called "good" by the namer,
by virtue of it's inherent constituent qualities
to the namer, in this case, the Creator,
whereas to call light "evil" would suggest
that light itself has a consciousness and
a will to interact with the assigner,
in this case The Creator,
in a negative manner.
and so, now, we ask;
can gravity and entropy be considered "evil"?
considering that "evil" is -only- a form
of conscious knowledge then to assign gravity
and entropy as "evil" would be assigning a
consciousness to forces of the material
nature, and still, we would be -forced-
to demand that such forces -can- have
-no- choice in their general dynamic nature.
that is, "gravity" cannot -choose-
to behave in any other way that it
behaves as a fact of its nature.
and therefore, lacking a will of its own
and therefore -not- "evil" in and of
the thing in itself.
but to call gravity and entropy "good"
need insinuate no such consciousness in
to the immaterial forces at all, and is
simply a matter left up to the discretion
of The Creator, and whoever makes
such an assignation.
and so, skipping ahead, when God designs
and forms the little creature from
the dust of the ground,
matter that is subject to gravity
and entropy is the -only- medium.
and still, one may simply call
the -medium- a "good" medium,
which has no 'evil' as part
of its constituent make-up.
but if matter must be of a certain
composition no matter who brings
it forth or makes it happen,
that only leads to the idea that,
"there is only one possible God"
as opposed to;
"God cannot be God if God cannot
do a thing that can not be done"
if there's -only- one form of
material universe, -and- God
-must- make it happen,
God is still God
even if you'd like to suggest that
another type of material universe
would have been "better" even if
you cannot describe such a
possibility with any referrence.
and so, you have a God that does not
change and a material nature whose
general dynamics do not change and
a simple matter of authority.
For God, it's basically a done deal,
for God to be 'real' God -must- work
with the realities of -this- material nature.
and still, neither God nor the realities
of the material nature need ever be
classified as "evil"
-man- -can- get stuck in a
wrestling match with
the elements.
and even -this- struggle itself
need not be termed an "evil" struggle.
-and-;
in -our- understanding of the nature of Jesus Christ's
effective work within the material nature, we consider
that Jesus Christ has pinned the material nature on
the mat for the non-material God.
and therefore, that the Identity
of Jesus Christ can be -only-
"The Creator -in- the Material Medium"
essentially, that is how The Creator God
brings the material nature within the
authority of the Fullness of Deity.
by passing in to that material nature
and bring -it- in to subjection of
this Creator God's own Will.
-first- by forming the vessel through
which God -would- enter the material
Universe, and then by entering in to
the material universe merging the
two natures in One.
and right now, we see the Risen Jesus as
having completed a good work and in this
manner as we -begin- to see ourselves
in like manner to Christ.
we see Jesus as having full authority
in the material nature, and entry back
in to the Eternal Dwelling of God,
and we draw ever closer to this full
manipulative authority for ourselves.
but the end rpoduct is driven
under God's own discretion.
and so, we walk towards driving our
physical natures as would befit beings
called "good" by God
and not being impelled by gravity
and entropy to -behave- in manners
which are not befitting the title "good"
but which would be in conflict
with the Love of God.
and this understanding we employ
to walk in this manner we know will
be useful when we are allowed entry
in to the Glorified Dwellings of the Deity.
that is, we use -now- to reconcile our
conflicts because those conflicts will
not enter into the Dwelling of God.
this is our Gift....
....
.
|
