Mark this on your calendars, folks. Paster dave claims in Message-ID:
<qgpgmvoetpo3o0bfbgvmohoooptjsvgc50@4ax.com that he has kill-filed Didymos.
How long will it last this time? We do recall that he kill-filed me on July
24th, 2003. Hmmmm, if that is true, why must he repeat the process? Did
paster dave lie yet again? Is he lying now? Time will tell . . . . but
there is a very high probability.
Here is the full message in which paster dave claims to have committed this
heinous act:
Path:
newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.new
s.atl.earthlink.net!elnk-atl-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newshosting.com!news
-xfer1.atl.newshosting.com!167.206.3.103.MISMATCH!news3.optonline.net!cyclon
e.rdc-nyc.rr.com!news-west.rr.com!news.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!news-p
ost.tampabay.rr.com!twister.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Pastor Dave <nospam-draymond@minister.com>
Newsgroups: alt.bible
Subject: Re: Critical Text Did Use Byzantine/Majority Texts
Message-ID: <qgpgmvoetpo3o0bfbgvmohoooptjsvgc50@4ax.com>
References: <V367b.3771$PE6.43@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
<kY97b.717$8o3.56@news2.central.cox.net>
<%Ja7b.4066$PE6.3763@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
<taF7b.8518$8o3.104@news2.central.cox.net>
<g7culvslhsd5715q3ec5e44f1anj1c3bv6@4ax.com>
<CFQ9b.6672$BS5.4542@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 47
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:49:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.35.208.235
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: twister.tampabay.rr.com 1063806584 65.35.208.235 (Wed, 17 Sep 2003
09:49:44 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:49:44 EDT
Organization: RoadRunner - Tampa Bay
Xref: news.earthlink.net alt.bible:833581
X-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:00:00 PDT
(newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net)
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 03:37:06 GMT, "Didymos"
<me@privacy.net> wrote:
This is another lie by Didymos and he cannot quote me
saying that they were not used in the preparation of
the Critical Text. I said that the Critical Text is
not "based on" the Majority Text and that is true. For
example, if I consult the MT, but tend to reject it in
favor of the Alexandrian Texts, whenever there is a
discrepancy, am I not correct in stating that the
Critical Text is not based on the Majority Text?
No, you are not correct. As usual. Go read a real book instead of your
weird King James only nuttiness.
I've had enough of your lies about me and the false
information that you post here. Goodbye. <plonck!>
___
Pastor Dave Raymond
"As for me, I have not hastened from being a pastor
to follow thee: neither have I desired the woeful day;
thou knowest: that which came out of my lips was right
before thee." - Jeremiah 17:16
"There are only two possibilities as to how life
arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to
evolution; the other is a supernatural creative
act of God. There is no third possibility.
Spontaneous generation, that life arose from
non-living matter was scientifically disproved
120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That
leaves us with the only possible conclusion that
life arose as a supernatural creative act of God.
I will not accept that philosophically because I
do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose
to believe in that which I know is scientifically
impossible; spontaneous generation arising to
evolution." - (Wald, George, "Innovation and
Biology," Scientific American, Vol. 199,
Sept. 1958, p. 100)
.
|
