Proof, Bible Bob, Proof



 Religions > Bible > Proof, Bible Bob, Proof

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "Carl"
Date: 12 Jun 2007 11:01:06 PM
Object: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof
"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse, point by point the position
taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:
John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon
If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.
{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}
May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/
.

User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 12:58:51 AM
Carl wrote:


{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is
pretty much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way
by HIS rules or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and
engage in self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that
"Bible Bob" is unable to defend his heresies especially when learned,
Godly men refute his heresies time and time again with information
they provided in the past.

Which is exactly what BB say about you. In fact most of you fundies here
would need philosopher's cages if you met in public.
All of you talk like Martin Luther who said believe him or be damned.
"I do not admit that my doctrine can be judged by anyone, even the angels.
He who does not receive my doctrine cannot be saved"
-- Martin Luther Werke (Erlangen),XXIX , 217-33, on Maritian, 15.
The difference is that you think it makes sense and he saw how insane it
was.
"All the article of our christian faith, which God has revealed to us in His
Word, are in the presence of reason shearly impossible, absurd and false.
....Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has. ...She is the devils
greatest *****... a ***** eaten by scabs and leprosy, who ought to be
trodden underfoot and destroyed, she and her wisdom...Throw dung in her
face...drown her in baptism"
-- Martin Luther
Whoever wants to be a Christian should tear the eyes out of his Reason.
-- Martin Luther
"If by any effort of reason I could conceive how God, Who shows so much
anger and iniquity, could be merciful and just, there would be no need of
faith."
-- Martin Luther
.
User: "Bible Bob"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 01:53:10 AM
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:58:51 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Carl wrote:


{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is
pretty much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way
by HIS rules or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and
engage in self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that
"Bible Bob" is unable to defend his heresies especially when learned,
Godly men refute his heresies time and time again with information
they provided in the past.

Which is exactly what BB say about you. In fact most of you fundies here
would need philosopher's cages if you met in public.

All of you talk like Martin Luther who said believe him or be damned.

"I do not admit that my doctrine can be judged by anyone, even the angels.
He who does not receive my doctrine cannot be saved"
-- Martin Luther Werke (Erlangen),XXIX , 217-33, on Maritian, 15.


The difference is that you think it makes sense and he saw how insane it
was.



"All the article of our christian faith, which God has revealed to us in His
Word, are in the presence of reason shearly impossible, absurd and false.
...Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has. ...She is the devils
greatest *****... a ***** eaten by scabs and leprosy, who ought to be
trodden underfoot and destroyed, she and her wisdom...Throw dung in her
face...drown her in baptism"
-- Martin Luther

Whoever wants to be a Christian should tear the eyes out of his Reason.
-- Martin Luther

"If by any effort of reason I could conceive how God, Who shows so much
anger and iniquity, could be merciful and just, there would be no need of
faith."
-- Martin Luther




Mike,
Not bad; even if it is aimed at me.
BB
.
User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 12:47:38 AM
Bible Bob wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:58:51 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Carl wrote:


{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is
pretty much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS
way by HIS rules or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash"
and engage in self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is
that "Bible Bob" is unable to defend his heresies especially when
learned, Godly men refute his heresies time and time again with
information they provided in the past.

Which is exactly what BB say about you. In fact most of you fundies
here would need philosopher's cages if you met in public.

All of you talk like Martin Luther who said believe him or be
damned.

"I do not admit that my doctrine can be judged by anyone, even the
angels. He who does not receive my doctrine cannot be saved"
-- Martin Luther Werke (Erlangen),XXIX , 217-33, on Maritian, 15.


The difference is that you think it makes sense and he saw how
insane it was.



"All the article of our christian faith, which God has revealed to
us in His Word, are in the presence of reason shearly impossible,
absurd and false. ...Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has.
...She is the devils greatest *****... a ***** eaten by scabs and
leprosy, who ought to be trodden underfoot and destroyed, she and
her wisdom...Throw dung in her face...drown her in baptism"
-- Martin Luther

Whoever wants to be a Christian should tear the eyes out of his
Reason. -- Martin Luther

"If by any effort of reason I could conceive how God, Who shows so
much anger and iniquity, could be merciful and just, there would be
no need of faith."
-- Martin Luther




Mike,

Not bad; even if it is aimed at me.

BB

Don't flatter yourself. You are no better than most of the other nutjobs who
make the claim.
.
User: "Bible Bob"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 07:05:56 AM
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:47:38 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Bible Bob wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:58:51 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Carl wrote:


{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is
pretty much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS
way by HIS rules or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash"
and engage in self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is
that "Bible Bob" is unable to defend his heresies especially when
learned, Godly men refute his heresies time and time again with
information they provided in the past.

Which is exactly what BB say about you. In fact most of you fundies
here would need philosopher's cages if you met in public.

All of you talk like Martin Luther who said believe him or be
damned.

"I do not admit that my doctrine can be judged by anyone, even the
angels. He who does not receive my doctrine cannot be saved"
-- Martin Luther Werke (Erlangen),XXIX , 217-33, on Maritian, 15.


The difference is that you think it makes sense and he saw how
insane it was.



"All the article of our christian faith, which God has revealed to
us in His Word, are in the presence of reason shearly impossible,
absurd and false. ...Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has.
...She is the devils greatest *****... a ***** eaten by scabs and
leprosy, who ought to be trodden underfoot and destroyed, she and
her wisdom...Throw dung in her face...drown her in baptism"
-- Martin Luther

Whoever wants to be a Christian should tear the eyes out of his
Reason. -- Martin Luther

"If by any effort of reason I could conceive how God, Who shows so
much anger and iniquity, could be merciful and just, there would be
no need of faith."
-- Martin Luther




Mike,

Not bad; even if it is aimed at me.

BB

Don't flatter yourself. You are no better than most of the other nutjobs who
make the claim.

Mike,
I don't Mr Coconut. I'm just a little spanish peanut.
BB
.




User: "rogue"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 01:28:35 AM
On Jun 13, 8:01 am, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com> wrote:

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse, point by point the position
taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:

John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon

If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.

{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}

May God bless,
Carl
website --http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog --http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

JERRY
Um, excuse me, but I can tell you that Geisler is an inarticulate
clown who can't even defend his bible in open debate. Why should you
offer him as an "authority" on the bible?
The rest of the people you mention I've never heard of and would have
to research but I'm betting if you could get even ONE of them to come
to Usenet to debate, within a week they would disappear, never to be
seen again.
Also, some of us post via Google and have a limitation of five groups
that we can crosspost to. Could you trim down your crosspost list? I
post in free.christians and I trim the two groups just in front of
that, but if we have someone posting from one of the two groups that I
remove, I don't want someone excluded from the discussion.
thanks,
.

User: "Bible Bob"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 12:42:00 AM
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com>
wrote:

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse, point by point the position
taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:

John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon

If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.

{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

Carl,
Grow up.
You prove from the word of God what you think is true.
.
User: "john w"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 05:10:12 AM
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:42:00 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com>
wrote:

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse, point by point the position
taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:

John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon

If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.

{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

Carl,

Grow up.

You prove from the word of God what you think is true.

Grow up, Bob!
You CAN'T prove from the Word of God what YOU believe is true!
Carl's point is well-taken. IT's a time-honored tradition going back
to Jesus and the Apostles referring to the prophets of the Old
Testament.
Carl has said, you won't listen to him, you won't listen to me, there
are a dozen Christians in here who you will not listen to.
We therefore submit the views of the scholars of our time, just like
Jesus submitted the views of the prophets who were the scholars of His
time!
And you don't know enough Bible to out-debate the scholarship of our
time. You wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Charles Stanley, you
wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Jess Moody, you wouldn't last 5
minutes against Dr John MacArthur.
You're all bluster, no scholarship!
And I go right back to what I told you YEARS ago:
Bob, the only person you are fooling is you!
john w
.
User: "Bible Bob"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 11:30:09 PM
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:10:12 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:42:00 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com>
wrote:

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse, point by point the position
taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:

John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon

If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.

{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

Carl,

Grow up.

You prove from the word of God what you think is true.


Grow up, Bob!
You CAN'T prove from the Word of God what YOU believe is true!

Of course I can. There is a difference between what I am able to do
and what I am willing to do. Suppose, for example, that I believe ten
thousand things are true. Those ten thousand things would be what I
believe. I am able to prove them to be true but am not willing to
devote the time and energy necessary to explain them to someone who
wouldn't understand the explanations.
Carl worships men and named some of his deities above. As their self
proclaimed prophet he demanded that I explain the doctrines of his
false gods. I will put no other gods before my God Who is the one one
true God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ. Carl is mad at me
because I won't join in his harlotry and uses illogical childish
taunts such as above where he implies that if I don't join in his
whoring after other gods that I don't trust in God.


Carl's point is well-taken. IT's a time-honored tradition going back
to Jesus and the Apostles referring to the prophets of the Old
Testament.

Carl has no point founded on the truth of the word of God. Carl is
like a Pryor of the 'Ori who thinks that that people should do what he
says or be destroyed. To equate Carl with Jesus and the Apsotles is
to equate Jesus and the Apostles with Satan.


Carl has said, you won't listen to him, you won't listen to me, there
are a dozen Christians in here who you will not listen to.

Carl says a lot of things that are not true and uses the opinions of
men to validate his man made belief system. So do you.


We therefore submit the views of the scholars of our time, just like
Jesus submitted the views of the prophets who were the scholars of His
time!

Bad comparison. Jesus quoted men of God who spoke for God the words
of God. You guys quote men who do not speak the word of God by
revelation for God. You quote opinions of men and doctrines of devils
and neither of those are equivalent to what Jesus quoted.


And you don't know enough Bible to out-debate the scholarship of our
time. You wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Charles Stanley, you
wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Jess Moody, you wouldn't last 5
minutes against Dr John MacArthur.

That is silly. I would not lower my standards to debate the word of
God. Why would I waste my time talking to the gods that you worship.
Your behavior indicates that your gods have not helped you. Why would
I be stupid enough to waste my time on false gods that can't even help
you?

You're all bluster, no scholarship!

You are the one doing the talking and not using any "scholarship" to
back up what he says.


And I go right back to what I told you YEARS ago:

Bob, the only person you are fooling is you!

While fooling people may be your goal in life and what you dwell on in
your fantasies; it is not mine.



john w

.
User: "john w"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 01:28:54 AM
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:30:09 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:10:12 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:42:00 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com>
wrote:

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse, point by point the position
taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:

John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon

If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.

{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

Carl,

Grow up.

You prove from the word of God what you think is true.


Grow up, Bob!
You CAN'T prove from the Word of God what YOU believe is true!


Of course I can.

You are truly wasting your time.
I have neither the time nor the interest in continuing this ridiculous
dialogue.
There isn't a scholar alive today who wouldn't laugh in your face.
john w
There is a difference between what I am able to do

and what I am willing to do. Suppose, for example, that I believe ten
thousand things are true. Those ten thousand things would be what I
believe. I am able to prove them to be true but am not willing to
devote the time and energy necessary to explain them to someone who
wouldn't understand the explanations.

Carl worships men and named some of his deities above. As their self
proclaimed prophet he demanded that I explain the doctrines of his
false gods. I will put no other gods before my God Who is the one one
true God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ. Carl is mad at me
because I won't join in his harlotry and uses illogical childish
taunts such as above where he implies that if I don't join in his
whoring after other gods that I don't trust in God.


Carl's point is well-taken. IT's a time-honored tradition going back
to Jesus and the Apostles referring to the prophets of the Old
Testament.


Carl has no point founded on the truth of the word of God. Carl is
like a Pryor of the 'Ori who thinks that that people should do what he
says or be destroyed. To equate Carl with Jesus and the Apsotles is
to equate Jesus and the Apostles with Satan.


Carl has said, you won't listen to him, you won't listen to me, there
are a dozen Christians in here who you will not listen to.


Carl says a lot of things that are not true and uses the opinions of
men to validate his man made belief system. So do you.


We therefore submit the views of the scholars of our time, just like
Jesus submitted the views of the prophets who were the scholars of His
time!


Bad comparison. Jesus quoted men of God who spoke for God the words
of God. You guys quote men who do not speak the word of God by
revelation for God. You quote opinions of men and doctrines of devils
and neither of those are equivalent to what Jesus quoted.


And you don't know enough Bible to out-debate the scholarship of our
time. You wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Charles Stanley, you
wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Jess Moody, you wouldn't last 5
minutes against Dr John MacArthur.


That is silly. I would not lower my standards to debate the word of
God. Why would I waste my time talking to the gods that you worship.
Your behavior indicates that your gods have not helped you. Why would
I be stupid enough to waste my time on false gods that can't even help
you?

You're all bluster, no scholarship!


You are the one doing the talking and not using any "scholarship" to
back up what he says.


And I go right back to what I told you YEARS ago:

Bob, the only person you are fooling is you!


While fooling people may be your goal in life and what you dwell on in
your fantasies; it is not mine.



john w

.
User: "Bible Bob"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 07:08:27 AM
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:28:54 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:30:09 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:10:12 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:42:00 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com>
wrote:

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse, point by point the position
taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:

John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon

If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.

{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

Carl,

Grow up.

You prove from the word of God what you think is true.


Grow up, Bob!
You CAN'T prove from the Word of God what YOU believe is true!


Of course I can.


You are truly wasting your time.
I have neither the time nor the interest in continuing this ridiculous
dialogue.
There isn't a scholar alive today who wouldn't laugh in your face.
john w

jw,
With you? Maybe so. But I think you have the potential to learn some
reality.
BB


There is a difference between what I am able to do

and what I am willing to do. Suppose, for example, that I believe ten
thousand things are true. Those ten thousand things would be what I
believe. I am able to prove them to be true but am not willing to
devote the time and energy necessary to explain them to someone who
wouldn't understand the explanations.

Carl worships men and named some of his deities above. As their self
proclaimed prophet he demanded that I explain the doctrines of his
false gods. I will put no other gods before my God Who is the one one
true God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ. Carl is mad at me
because I won't join in his harlotry and uses illogical childish
taunts such as above where he implies that if I don't join in his
whoring after other gods that I don't trust in God.


Carl's point is well-taken. IT's a time-honored tradition going back
to Jesus and the Apostles referring to the prophets of the Old
Testament.


Carl has no point founded on the truth of the word of God. Carl is
like a Pryor of the 'Ori who thinks that that people should do what he
says or be destroyed. To equate Carl with Jesus and the Apsotles is
to equate Jesus and the Apostles with Satan.


Carl has said, you won't listen to him, you won't listen to me, there
are a dozen Christians in here who you will not listen to.


Carl says a lot of things that are not true and uses the opinions of
men to validate his man made belief system. So do you.


We therefore submit the views of the scholars of our time, just like
Jesus submitted the views of the prophets who were the scholars of His
time!


Bad comparison. Jesus quoted men of God who spoke for God the words
of God. You guys quote men who do not speak the word of God by
revelation for God. You quote opinions of men and doctrines of devils
and neither of those are equivalent to what Jesus quoted.


And you don't know enough Bible to out-debate the scholarship of our
time. You wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Charles Stanley, you
wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Jess Moody, you wouldn't last 5
minutes against Dr John MacArthur.


That is silly. I would not lower my standards to debate the word of
God. Why would I waste my time talking to the gods that you worship.
Your behavior indicates that your gods have not helped you. Why would
I be stupid enough to waste my time on false gods that can't even help
you?

You're all bluster, no scholarship!


You are the one doing the talking and not using any "scholarship" to
back up what he says.


And I go right back to what I told you YEARS ago:

Bob, the only person you are fooling is you!


While fooling people may be your goal in life and what you dwell on in
your fantasies; it is not mine.



john w

.
User: "john w"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 11:41:51 AM
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:08:27 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:28:54 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:30:09 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 03:10:12 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 01:42:00 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com>
wrote:

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse, point by point the position
taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:

John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon

If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.

{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

Carl,

Grow up.

You prove from the word of God what you think is true.


Grow up, Bob!
You CAN'T prove from the Word of God what YOU believe is true!


Of course I can.


You are truly wasting your time.
I have neither the time nor the interest in continuing this ridiculous
dialogue.
There isn't a scholar alive today who wouldn't laugh in your face.



john w


jw,

With you? Maybe so.

That made NO sense!
What have you been snorting or smoking?
But I think you have the potential to learn some

reality.

chuckle. First you need to be aware of reality, before you show it to
someone else.
And when you have visited one or more of the 1st century churches,
when you can claim that you know a dozen "Drs", who are pastors,
get back to me.
On second thought, don't bother!
john w


BB


There is a difference between what I am able to do

and what I am willing to do. Suppose, for example, that I believe ten
thousand things are true. Those ten thousand things would be what I
believe. I am able to prove them to be true but am not willing to
devote the time and energy necessary to explain them to someone who
wouldn't understand the explanations.

Carl worships men and named some of his deities above. As their self
proclaimed prophet he demanded that I explain the doctrines of his
false gods. I will put no other gods before my God Who is the one one
true God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ. Carl is mad at me
because I won't join in his harlotry and uses illogical childish
taunts such as above where he implies that if I don't join in his
whoring after other gods that I don't trust in God.


Carl's point is well-taken. IT's a time-honored tradition going back
to Jesus and the Apostles referring to the prophets of the Old
Testament.


Carl has no point founded on the truth of the word of God. Carl is
like a Pryor of the 'Ori who thinks that that people should do what he
says or be destroyed. To equate Carl with Jesus and the Apsotles is
to equate Jesus and the Apostles with Satan.


Carl has said, you won't listen to him, you won't listen to me, there
are a dozen Christians in here who you will not listen to.


Carl says a lot of things that are not true and uses the opinions of
men to validate his man made belief system. So do you.


We therefore submit the views of the scholars of our time, just like
Jesus submitted the views of the prophets who were the scholars of His
time!


Bad comparison. Jesus quoted men of God who spoke for God the words
of God. You guys quote men who do not speak the word of God by
revelation for God. You quote opinions of men and doctrines of devils
and neither of those are equivalent to what Jesus quoted.


And you don't know enough Bible to out-debate the scholarship of our
time. You wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Charles Stanley, you
wouldn't last 5 minutes against Dr Jess Moody, you wouldn't last 5
minutes against Dr John MacArthur.


That is silly. I would not lower my standards to debate the word of
God. Why would I waste my time talking to the gods that you worship.
Your behavior indicates that your gods have not helped you. Why would
I be stupid enough to waste my time on false gods that can't even help
you?

You're all bluster, no scholarship!


You are the one doing the talking and not using any "scholarship" to
back up what he says.


And I go right back to what I told you YEARS ago:

Bob, the only person you are fooling is you!


While fooling people may be your goal in life and what you dwell on in
your fantasies; it is not mine.



john w

.
User: "Christopher Morris"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 15 Jun 2007 05:18:55 AM


chuckle. First you need to be aware of reality, before you show it to
someone else.

And when you have visited one or more of the 1st century churches,
when you can claim that you know a dozen "Drs", who are pastors,
get back to me.

On second thought, don't bother!

john w


One who is as divorced from reality as you have always been shown to be
should not lecture others on the need to deal with reality.
.
User: "john w"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 15 Jun 2007 04:38:06 PM
x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:18:55 -0400, "Christopher Morris"
<Draccus@roadrunner.com> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.



chuckle. First you need to be aware of reality, before you show it to
someone else.

And when you have visited one or more of the 1st century churches,
when you can claim that you know a dozen "Drs", who are pastors,
get back to me.

On second thought, don't bother!

john w


One who is as divorced from reality as you have always been shown to be
should not lecture others on the need to deal with reality.

Was that your best attempt at an insult?
tsk tsk
john w


.


User: "Bible Bob"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 07:13:32 PM
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:41:51 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:08:27 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:28:54 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

<snip old stuff>


jw said:
You are truly wasting your time.
I have neither the time nor the interest in continuing this ridiculous
dialogue.
There isn't a scholar alive today who wouldn't laugh in your face.
john w
BB responded:
jw,


With you? Maybe so. (responding to jw's first sentence)
jw responded:


That made NO sense!
BB responds:
To you, probably not since it was an answer to your statement
jw begins usual ad hominem attack:


What have you been snorting or smoking?
BB responds:
Pneuma hagion; the best there is.


BB continues responding to jw's original statement:
But I think you have the potential to learn some reality.
jw responds:


chuckle. First you need to be aware of reality, before you show it to
someone else.
BB responds:
I am aware of you; are you real?
jw continues:


And when you have visited one or more of the 1st century churches,
when you can claim that you know a dozen "Drs", who are pastors,
get back to me.

On second thought, don't bother!

john w

BB responds:
I may be wasting my words on you John, but not my time because each of
your responses provides evidence that what I have been saying all
along is true. I am very aware of reality; both what is real and not
real in the Scriptures and what is real and unreal on the earth. You,
for example, are real even though your vain imaginations are not real.
In this series of posts you; Carl, and Checker have proven that the
three of you are men worshippers in lieu of God worshippers. Checker,
does a lot less name dropping and quote more Scripture than you and
Carl combined but he is influenced by the doctrines of men that he
worships before God. Carl and you provide laudry lists of the names
of the men you worship in lieu of God. Below is one of Carl's short
lists of men he worships and expects others to worsdhip as well.
"... Matthew Henry, John Wesley, Norman Geisler, Randy Ray, John
Ankerberg, Walter Martin, J Vernon McGee, Arthur Pink, Jerry Falwell,
Kevin Hall, Woodrow Kroll, James White, Oswald Chambers, David
Jeremiah, James Dobson, Billy Graham, R.C. Sproul, Adrian Rogers, Jack
Graham, Ray Stedman, Doug Goins, Ron Ritchie, Steve Zeisler, John
Bunyan, C.H. Spurgeon, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Finney, James
Hastings, Josiah Evans, Colin Woodbury, Bob Tindale, John Willis,
Timothy Whitaker, etc. "
Now, I know he is just trying to show off and impress other men
worshippers by showing them how long his god list is. But the list
does reveal who his gods are. You also quoted the names of your gods
in your god list a couple of days ago; but I don't want to embarrass
you by showing that Carl's is bigger than yours. You two can expose
your weanies to each other without me getting involved.
What sad is that the two of you are dirtying the names of men with
reasonable honorable reputations. I have heard some of the names in
Carl's list and your list and do not think from what I have heard of
them that they would appreciate you worshippoing them as gods; nor
smearing their reputations by connecting their names with idolators
such as yourself and Carl.
Your claim to fame is visiting a first century church and knowing a
dozen "Drs." Most people with your problems need only one shrink;
some maybe two. But I think you were talking about Thd type doctors
which are not real doctors because you connected "Drs" with "pastors"
and not to many shrinks are pastors. Your claim to fame is visiting a
church and worshipping a dozen "Drs" that are pasators.
My claim to fame is worshipping the one true God and my Lord Jesus
Christ in the one true church that is the body of Christ. I can't
compare weanies with you because neither my God; nor my Lord are
weanies. They are real big. My church is bigger than your church,
too as it consists of all the children of God since the day of
Pentecost.
I got a bigger and better God than you and Carl and I got a bigger and
better church than you and Carl. I win. You guys lose.
You guys don't have to stay losers; change gods from men to God and
lords from men to Jesus Christ.
Go ahead and continue to post more stuff proving that you do not know
the word of God and that you worship men in lieu of God. I like it
when frauds expose themselves. Do God a favor; stop calling yourself
Christian until you repent since your behavior proves that you are not
a disciple and it is not smart to live a lie.
<snip old stuff>
BB
.
User: "john w"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 15 Jun 2007 04:39:08 PM
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:13:32 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:41:51 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:08:27 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:28:54 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

<snip old stuff>



jw said:

You are truly wasting your time.
I have neither the time nor the interest in continuing this ridiculous
dialogue.
There isn't a scholar alive today who wouldn't laugh in your face.


john w

BB responded:
jw,


With you? Maybe so. (responding to jw's first sentence)

Is that truly your "best shot"? To sling-shot my comment back at me?
tsk tsk
john w


jw responded:


That made NO sense!

BB responds:

To you, probably not since it was an answer to your statement

jw begins usual ad hominem attack:


What have you been snorting or smoking?

BB responds:

Pneuma hagion; the best there is.


BB continues responding to jw's original statement:

But I think you have the potential to learn some reality.

jw responds:


chuckle. First you need to be aware of reality, before you show it to
someone else.

BB responds:

I am aware of you; are you real?

jw continues:


And when you have visited one or more of the 1st century churches,
when you can claim that you know a dozen "Drs", who are pastors,
get back to me.

On second thought, don't bother!

john w


BB responds:

I may be wasting my words on you John, but not my time because each of
your responses provides evidence that what I have been saying all
along is true. I am very aware of reality; both what is real and not
real in the Scriptures and what is real and unreal on the earth. You,
for example, are real even though your vain imaginations are not real.

In this series of posts you; Carl, and Checker have proven that the
three of you are men worshippers in lieu of God worshippers. Checker,
does a lot less name dropping and quote more Scripture than you and
Carl combined but he is influenced by the doctrines of men that he
worships before God. Carl and you provide laudry lists of the names
of the men you worship in lieu of God. Below is one of Carl's short
lists of men he worships and expects others to worsdhip as well.

"... Matthew Henry, John Wesley, Norman Geisler, Randy Ray, John
Ankerberg, Walter Martin, J Vernon McGee, Arthur Pink, Jerry Falwell,
Kevin Hall, Woodrow Kroll, James White, Oswald Chambers, David
Jeremiah, James Dobson, Billy Graham, R.C. Sproul, Adrian Rogers, Jack
Graham, Ray Stedman, Doug Goins, Ron Ritchie, Steve Zeisler, John
Bunyan, C.H. Spurgeon, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Finney, James
Hastings, Josiah Evans, Colin Woodbury, Bob Tindale, John Willis,
Timothy Whitaker, etc. "

Now, I know he is just trying to show off and impress other men
worshippers by showing them how long his god list is. But the list
does reveal who his gods are. You also quoted the names of your gods
in your god list a couple of days ago; but I don't want to embarrass
you by showing that Carl's is bigger than yours. You two can expose
your weanies to each other without me getting involved.

What sad is that the two of you are dirtying the names of men with
reasonable honorable reputations. I have heard some of the names in
Carl's list and your list and do not think from what I have heard of
them that they would appreciate you worshippoing them as gods; nor
smearing their reputations by connecting their names with idolators
such as yourself and Carl.

Your claim to fame is visiting a first century church and knowing a
dozen "Drs." Most people with your problems need only one shrink;
some maybe two. But I think you were talking about Thd type doctors
which are not real doctors because you connected "Drs" with "pastors"
and not to many shrinks are pastors. Your claim to fame is visiting a
church and worshipping a dozen "Drs" that are pasators.

My claim to fame is worshipping the one true God and my Lord Jesus
Christ in the one true church that is the body of Christ. I can't
compare weanies with you because neither my God; nor my Lord are
weanies. They are real big. My church is bigger than your church,
too as it consists of all the children of God since the day of
Pentecost.

I got a bigger and better God than you and Carl and I got a bigger and
better church than you and Carl. I win. You guys lose.

You guys don't have to stay losers; change gods from men to God and
lords from men to Jesus Christ.

Go ahead and continue to post more stuff proving that you do not know
the word of God and that you worship men in lieu of God. I like it
when frauds expose themselves. Do God a favor; stop calling yourself
Christian until you repent since your behavior proves that you are not
a disciple and it is not smart to live a lie.

<snip old stuff>

BB

.








User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"

Title: Re: CROCK OF CRAP CARL, CROCK OF CRAP 13 Jun 2007 05:53:04 AM
the christian religion is nothing but a TOTAL AND COMPLETE FARCE.
why is that christians NEVER provide any VERIFIABLE PROOF of the existance
of their sky pixie.
they only have some ***** fairy tale book that has talking snakes and
talking donkeys in it.
how many talking snakes and talking donkeys have YOU seen today?
even my young daughter knows that snakes and donkeys do not talk, but don't
tell that to christian nuts
.
User: "john w"

Title: Re: CROCK OF CRAP CARL, CROCK OF CRAP 13 Jun 2007 10:03:17 AM
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:53:04 GMT, "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"
<killgod@killgod.com> wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.


the christian religion is nothing but a TOTAL AND COMPLETE FARCE.

why is that christians NEVER provide any VERIFIABLE PROOF of the existance
of their sky pixie.
they only have some ***** fairy tale book that has talking snakes and
talking donkeys in it.

Why would someone who doesn't believe, who has nothing but contempt
for "religion", and for those who practice faith...
why would this person spend all his/ her waking hours in the company
of those he despises?
That has to be one of the worst cases of self-loathing on record!
Peace!
john w


how many talking snakes and talking donkeys have YOU seen today?

even my young daughter knows that snakes and donkeys do not talk, but don't
tell that to christian nuts


.
User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"

Title: Re: CROCK OF CRAP CARL, CROCK OF CRAP 13 Jun 2007 07:19:44 PM
good, so when are you going to get the HORSESHIT religious CRAP off of all
buildings, money,. etc?
.



User: "john w"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 05:15:20 AM
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse,

Carl, not 24 hours ago, you posted the following:
Heretics like "Bible Bob" aren't worthy of my time anymore per Titus
3:9,10.
You are sounding double-minded, sir.
john w
point by point the position

taken by the following individuals on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus
Christ:

John Ankerberg
James White
Norman Geisler
Woodrow Kroll
John Weldon

If you are unable to provide solid, unarguable refutations on these
individuals' positions on the Trinity and the deity of Jesus Christ then you
obviously do not trust in God because if you did you would know His Word and
would be willing and able to completely refute their stance.

{Folks, do you see how ridiculous the above sounds? However this is pretty
much what "Bible Bob" arrogantly demands. It has to be HIS way by HIS rules
or else HE is obligated to call our points "trash" and engage in
self-righteous ad hominem. The fact of the matter is that "Bible Bob" is
unable to defend his heresies especially when learned, Godly men refute his
heresies time and time again with information they provided in the past. The
heresies "Bible Bob" presents aren't new. They've been around quite a while
and have been thoroughly refuted many, many times. So all "Bible Bob" can do
is deny, deny, deny and then attempt to smear and besmirch while he
proclaims his superior knowledge and understanding. Okay, fine. Let's say
for arguments' sake that his knowledge and understanding is superior; I then
put forth the superior knowledge and understanding of the 5 men I listed
above and can many, many more who know more about Biblical languages,
exegesis, proper scholarly methods, orthodoxy and just simple Bible truths
than "Bible Bob" does in his boasting and bragging of his thirty-some-odd
years of study. Unfortunately, these gentlemen are too busy to bother with a
smalltime heretic like "Bible Bob" but frankly, I would love to see an
organized, structured debate between "Bible Bob" and any one of the
gentlemen listed above. I am certain that "Bible Bob" wouldn't stand a
chance and would be humiliated in public. But afterwards, deny, deny, deny
that he was. For that is the way of the heretic.}

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

.
User: ""

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 07:21:37 AM
On Jun 13, 6:15 am, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com>
wrote:
=A9 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse,


Carl, not 24 hours ago, you posted the following:
Heretics like "Bible Bob" aren't worthy of my time anymore per Titus
3:9,10.

You are sounding double-minded, sir.

john w

The "point by point" part was posted before I finally just decided to
end the nonsense with "Bible Bob." I posted the "aren't worthy of my
time" post via several "Bible Bob" posts to make it absolutely clear
that I am finished with him and wanted to make sure it could not be
missed. Yesterday was not a good day for me and I was a bit aggravated
over some personal issues and "Bible Bob"'s false accusations got me a
little angry. I don't need that sort of aggravation from a heretic so
after some prayer and scriptural reading, I felt God calling on me to
end it with "Bible Bob." If I am sounding double-minded then I must
tell you that it was not my intention to do so. As you know, I am
human and make mistaks...er...mistkeas...er...errors. :-)
[Which reminds me, thank you again for pointing out my messup on the
intro to the John 1:1,14 article I put together. I appreciate it.]
On a totally unrelated note, how's the photography going? Does it help
center your focus when you are out with your camera (or cameras -- I
don't know how extensive your equipment is) taking photos? Eventually
I want to upgrade to a Canon EOS digital camera of some sort with
three basic lens (standard, zoom and wide-angle). Right now I have an
Olympus point-and-shoot that does a pretty good job.
May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/
.
User: "Bible Bob"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 13 Jun 2007 11:53:36 PM
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:21:37 -0700,
wrote:

On Jun 13, 6:15 am, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse,


Carl, not 24 hours ago, you posted the following:
Heretics like "Bible Bob" aren't worthy of my time anymore per Titus
3:9,10.

You are sounding double-minded, sir.

john w


The "point by point" part was posted before I finally just decided to
end the nonsense with "Bible Bob." I posted the "aren't worthy of my
time" post via several "Bible Bob" posts to make it absolutely clear
that I am finished with him and wanted to make sure it could not be
missed. Yesterday was not a good day for me and I was a bit aggravated
over some personal issues and "Bible Bob"'s false accusations got me a
little angry. I don't need that sort of aggravation from a heretic so
after some prayer and scriptural reading, I felt God calling on me to
end it with "Bible Bob." If I am sounding double-minded then I must
tell you that it was not my intention to do so. As you know, I am
human and make mistaks...er...mistkeas...er...errors. :-)

Translation:
I have been caught in error and lying so many times that I am deathly
afraid that people will not worship me the way I want to be
worshipped. They won't recognize me for the great man that I am. BB
has even exposed me as being an imitator of SW and thinks that just
because I talk like him and walk like him and quack like him that I am
like him. BB exposing me as an idolater that worships men gets under
my skin. Sure it is true; but so what. As long as I can talk about
praying and type big words like Hermeneutics and Exegesis and name the
names of my gods I can fool some of the people some of the time. All
I want to do is fool people into thinking I am what I am not. What's
wrong with that. People get freaky in different ways; why can't I get
my freak on in my own way?


[Which reminds me, thank you again for pointing out my messup on the
intro to the John 1:1,14 article I put together. I appreciate it.]

On a totally unrelated note, how's the photography going? Does it help
center your focus when you are out with your camera (or cameras -- I
don't know how extensive your equipment is) taking photos? Eventually
I want to upgrade to a Canon EOS digital camera of some sort with
three basic lens (standard, zoom and wide-angle). Right now I have an
Olympus point-and-shoot that does a pretty good job.

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

.
User: "john w"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 01:40:12 AM
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:53:36 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:21:37 -0700,

wrote:

On Jun 13, 6:15 am, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse,


Carl, not 24 hours ago, you posted the following:
Heretics like "Bible Bob" aren't worthy of my time anymore per Titus
3:9,10.

You are sounding double-minded, sir.

john w


The "point by point" part was posted before I finally just decided to
end the nonsense with "Bible Bob." I posted the "aren't worthy of my
time" post via several "Bible Bob" posts to make it absolutely clear
that I am finished with him and wanted to make sure it could not be
missed. Yesterday was not a good day for me and I was a bit aggravated
over some personal issues and "Bible Bob"'s false accusations got me a
little angry. I don't need that sort of aggravation from a heretic so
after some prayer and scriptural reading, I felt God calling on me to
end it with "Bible Bob." If I am sounding double-minded then I must
tell you that it was not my intention to do so. As you know, I am
human and make mistaks...er...mistkeas...er...errors. :-)


Translation:
I have been caught in error and lying so many times that I am deathly
afraid that people will not worship me the way I want to be
worshipped.

I have never seen Carl utter one single word that suggests he's
looking to be worshipped.
We challenge your CRAP "theology", and you ad hominem us to death!
john w
They won't recognize me for the great man that I am. BB

has even exposed me as being an imitator of SW and thinks that just
because I talk like him and walk like him and quack like him that I am
like him. BB exposing me as an idolater that worships men gets under
my skin. Sure it is true; but so what. As long as I can talk about
praying and type big words like Hermeneutics and Exegesis and name the
names of my gods I can fool some of the people some of the time. All
I want to do is fool people into thinking I am what I am not. What's
wrong with that. People get freaky in different ways; why can't I get
my freak on in my own way?


[Which reminds me, thank you again for pointing out my messup on the
intro to the John 1:1,14 article I put together. I appreciate it.]

On a totally unrelated note, how's the photography going? Does it help
center your focus when you are out with your camera (or cameras -- I
don't know how extensive your equipment is) taking photos? Eventually
I want to upgrade to a Canon EOS digital camera of some sort with
three basic lens (standard, zoom and wide-angle). Right now I have an
Olympus point-and-shoot that does a pretty good job.

May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

.
User: ""

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 08:08:24 AM
On Jun 14, 2:40 am, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:53:36 -0400, Bible Bob <bible...@saintly.com>
wrote:
=A9 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.





On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:21:37 -0700,

wrote:


On Jun 13, 6:15 am, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <

>
wrote:
=A9 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this po=

st

may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.


"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse,


Carl, not 24 hours ago, you posted the following:
Heretics like "Bible Bob" aren't worthy of my time anymore per Titus
3:9,10.


You are sounding double-minded, sir.


john w


The "point by point" part was posted before I finally just decided to
end the nonsense with "Bible Bob." I posted the "aren't worthy of my
time" post via several "Bible Bob" posts to make it absolutely clear
that I am finished with him and wanted to make sure it could not be
missed. Yesterday was not a good day for me and I was a bit aggravated
over some personal issues and "Bible Bob"'s false accusations got me a
little angry. I don't need that sort of aggravation from a heretic so
after some prayer and scriptural reading, I felt God calling on me to
end it with "Bible Bob." If I am sounding double-minded then I must
tell you that it was not my intention to do so. As you know, I am
human and make mistaks...er...mistkeas...er...errors. :-)


Translation: =20
I have been caught in error and lying so many times that I am deathly
afraid that people will not worship me the way I want to be
worshipped.


I have never seen Carl utter one single word that suggests he's
looking to be worshipped.

Awww.don't worry about "Bible Bob." Now that I refuse to engage in any
dialogue with him, he resorts to slander, smear tactics and lies. This
is yet more examples of his true nature and why Titus 3:9-11 is an
excellent instruction that Christians reject divisive individuals like
"Bible Bob." "Bible Bob"'s desperation is evident. He can't attract so
he tries to bait.
May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/
.
User: "john w"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 12:00:26 PM
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:08:24 -0700,
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Jun 14, 2:40 am, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:53:36 -0400, Bible Bob <bible...@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.





On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:21:37 -0700,

wrote:


On Jun 13, 6:15 am, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <

>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.


"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse,


Carl, not 24 hours ago, you posted the following:
Heretics like "Bible Bob" aren't worthy of my time anymore per Titus
3:9,10.


You are sounding double-minded, sir.


john w


The "point by point" part was posted before I finally just decided to
end the nonsense with "Bible Bob." I posted the "aren't worthy of my
time" post via several "Bible Bob" posts to make it absolutely clear
that I am finished with him and wanted to make sure it could not be
missed. Yesterday was not a good day for me and I was a bit aggravated
over some personal issues and "Bible Bob"'s false accusations got me a
little angry. I don't need that sort of aggravation from a heretic so
after some prayer and scriptural reading, I felt God calling on me to
end it with "Bible Bob." If I am sounding double-minded then I must
tell you that it was not my intention to do so. As you know, I am
human and make mistaks...er...mistkeas...er...errors. :-)


Translation:
I have been caught in error and lying so many times that I am deathly
afraid that people will not worship me the way I want to be
worshipped.


I have never seen Carl utter one single word that suggests he's
looking to be worshipped.


Awww.don't worry about "Bible Bob." Now that I refuse to engage in any
dialogue with him, he resorts to slander, smear tactics and lies. This
is yet more examples of his true nature and why Titus 3:9-11 is an
excellent instruction that Christians reject divisive individuals like
"Bible Bob." "Bible Bob"'s desperation is evident. He can't attract so
he tries to bait.

;-)
"No further comment is needed." (how many times do you ice the same
cake?)
john w


May God bless,
Carl
website -- http://www.nettally.com/saints/
blog -- http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/

.


User: "Bible Bob"

Title: Re: Proof, Bible Bob, Proof 14 Jun 2007 07:10:12 AM
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 23:40:12 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com>
wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:53:36 -0400, Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:21:37 -0700,

wrote:

On Jun 13, 6:15 am, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:01:06 -0400, "Carl" <sai...@nettally.com>
wrote:
© 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.

"Bible Bob" prove line by line, verse by verse,


Carl, not 24 hours ago, you posted the following:
Heretics like "Bible Bob" aren't worthy of my time anymore per Titus
3:9,10.

You are sounding double-minded, sir.

john w


The "point by point" part was posted before I finally just decided to
end the nonsense with "Bible Bob." I posted the "aren't worthy of my
time" post via several "Bible Bob" posts to make it absolutely clear
that I am finished with him and wanted to make sure it could not be
missed. Yesterday was not a good day for me and I was a bit aggravated
over some personal issues and "Bible Bob"'s false accusations got me a
little angry. I don't need that sort of aggravation from a heretic so
after some prayer and scriptural reading, I felt God calling on me to
end it with "Bible Bob." If I am sounding double-minded then I must
tell you that it was not my intention to do so. As you know, I am
human and make mistaks...er...mistkeas...er...errors. :-)


Translation:
I have been caught in error and lying so many times that I am deathly
afraid that people will not worship me the way I want to be
worshipped.


I have never seen Carl utter one single word that suggests he's
looking to be worshipped.

Put on your spiritual glasses the next time you read


We challenge your CRAP "theology", and you ad hominem us to death!

Thanks for proving what I said is true.


john w

They won't recognize me for the great man that I am. BB

has even exposed me as