Re: @ QUOTES



 Religions > Bible > Re: @ QUOTES

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: " ::: good news :::"
Date: 28 Dec 2007 12:44:24 PM
Object: Re: @ QUOTES
See how the devil is fighting and twisting...
He knows there is not much time left...
In news:6u5an39cjgavkoo17c0eric70dq7d459dk@4ax.com,
Pastor Dave <ananias917_@_gmail.com> typed:

To all,

I would suggest that you check Vera's posts about me
very carefully, as she is misrepresenting me and doing
so on purpose.

For example, she quotes the following and pretends
it's what I said, regarding sex between a man and wife:

**********************************************
Dave's own words convict him of rape:

quote Dave:
then I took her by force
end quote.

THAT *IS* the definition of Rape.
**********************************************


She quotes this as if I said it and as if I admitted to
rape. In reality, it is a chopped version (by Glenn)
of what I said, which actually portrays the opposite idea!

Here is what I actually said...

**********************************************
However, if she said no and then I took her by force,
then we both have sinned. Her for saying no and me
for assaulting my wife
**********************************************

Clearly, these are two different versions! And you can see
in Vera's version, that it is someone else (Glenn) quoting
a chopped up version of my words! It even says so!!!

The fact is, Vera was recently exposed again to not have
a response for what I said Biblically and she hates me
for it! So she pretends that I'm making death threats
and uses year old messages to do it. I';m not saying
that I have never done anything wrong, but c'mon folks,
who has the evil motivation here???

Now knowing Vera will chop this down and pretend
I said it as a threat, I will give you an example of
what a death threat really is.

A death threat against someone, would be to name that
person specifically and say that *I* will come and *will*
kill them! A death threat does not consist of, "Hey man,
someone ought to.... <insert harsh words here>".

This is simple logic! Di saw that and said so as well!
She stated that she never saw me write to any specific
person that I was coming to kill them! Therefore, these
supposed "death threats" are nothing but a lying attempt
by Vera to attack me and falsely accuse me of something!

Of course Vera knows this, but Vera's mission is to attack
the person, when she can't attack the doctrine and of
course, if her foul words are repeated, then she snips it
and thinks that means she gets to say that she never said
it, even if she does quote it, as she has done, while she
denies it. :)

We are all familiar with the harm that Vera has repeatedly
done! And now her new cronie, Rod, who pretends he
doesn't know her, but came in here pretending to be
something he's not and thought he was setting me up
and who has been exposed (and boy did the language
fly from him, after he criticized me before being exposed),
now wishes to make false claims about me as well,
being ***** that he has been revealed for what he is!

Now look people... does truth mean anything any more?
Or does disagreeing with your doctrine mean you get to
attack a person and lie about them and then try to claim
they're evil, because they got upset about the attack?!

You know people, just because you may not like *how*
I said something, that does not make *what* I said wrong.
That's all I'm saying. And manipulating text to make it
appear as if the person said something they didn't say,
is wrong! And when someone has to do that, it shows
that they don't really have anything to fire at them!

For example, I was falsely accused of rape. If I call
the person an *****, does that mean saying that they're
a liar is somehow incorrect?! Yet people look at the word
"*****" and assume that the other part was never typed
and don't care about the false accusation and go on and
on for years about the word *****! And we all know
it isn't because of the word, but my doctrine! That's why
these same people don't say a word about people like
Baba, who said that cussing is okay when he does it
and yet, he criticizes me for it and people join him,
knowing he said it's okay to do! And then come the lies
and false accusations, of things I never even typed and
yet, people join in with Baba and claim they're true!

Sorry Baba, but you did do this and then when I finally
threatened legal action, you ran a way and still won't
apologize for your behavior and your libel!

I expect this from certain idiots here who don't give a damn
about anything but discrediting every person who disagrees
with their doctrine, by any means necessary, but others here
do surprise me when they gloss over the facts and pretend
that because the idiot accuser was falsely polite, they must
be "more Christian" than me, since I know these people
see the truth of what happened and they know that it is
because of doctrinal differences!

I apologize for the tone, really. I'm just surprised
by certain people, that's all. :)

Do you know why these groups are the way they are?
The readers of the false accusations, not the posters
of them. It's up to the readers.

What would happen, if every person kill filed them?
They'd go away! So it is up to us.

To those who have said some words on my behalf,
thank you and yes, I know the occasional foul language
is wrong and I apologize to you people for it. But I do
ask that you look at WHAT I am saying and not just
HOW I am saying it, okay? :)

--

The Last Days were in the first century:

Matthew 16:27-28

27) For the Son of man shall come in the glory
of his Father with his angels; and then he shall
reward every man according to his works.
28) Verily I say unto you, There be some standing
here, which shall not taste of death, till they
see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Jesus said He would return within the lifetime
of the Apostles. We know this, because Jesus
said SOME (at least one, not not most) would
be alive when this happened.

This is not the Transfiguration. There was no
coming with the Father's angels and no judging
every man according to His works and they were
all still alive.

This is not Pentecost. There was no coming
with the Father's angels and no judging
every man according to His works and they
were all but one, still alive.

Now see a verse that no one argues is about
His Second Coming and see that this is what
Jesus was referring to, in Matthew 16:27-28.

"And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward
is with me, to give every man according as
his work shall be." - Revelation 22:12

.

 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER