John W <john_weatherly47<no>@yahoo.com> Wed, 03 Dec 2003 08:42:34 -0800
smeared the groups with thew following attempt to play the innocent
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:51:46 GMT, "Didymoss" <me@privacy.net> wrote:
"sharon" <*...@....com> wrote in message
news:3041e7bf0891c58c9ca91089fb373070@news.secureusenet.com...
I hope that I'm not going to make anyone angry.
But I was curious what all the fuss was about, because my dad served in
the
Korean War (Naval officer)...and was still enlisted during the Vietnam
War.
Wow, you guys have been fussing over this a long time it appears.
Not a terribly big deal. I just see him lying about his service record
every so often and remind him that his service in the Vietnam war is a
figment of his imagination.
The liar is YOU, Clitymouse. And I have cleared up the many
No jezebeth, the lair is you, & has been alkl along. A lie by implication
is no less a lie than one told outright.
misunderstands your diseased brain has generated. You, however, prefer
your obsessions to the truth.
Compared to your version, the version of a person that only posts to feed
its flacid ego, I'll take Didymoss & even duke 32 & the poastor twins
over you anyday. Duke & the pastor twins might aaccidentally tell the
truth, but you will do your best to avoid that. Based on your posting
history that is.
And you have FAILED to mention that you harrass/attempt to just for
Maybe because the harrassment is only in that shallow mind of yours. You
made the brag, & have failed to provide any reason for anyone to beleive
you. Like I said, he may well know a permanent ward of the Govt., a
permanent resident in a VA bed for life, & then to see slime like you
slither across the groups living room leaving your mess on the carpet as
you insinuate you are a combat vet, & to gutless then to come right out &
say it. No, you begged for attention & accolades, & simply are getting
the attention you deserve.
fun, that you have asked me VERY personal information, which is none
of your damned business, and I have answered more than you or anyone
else has a right to know, and then you come back with "liar, liar,
liar, liar" (appears to be your favorite word), and then you ask MORE
personal questions.
In your case, it is an adjective for your persoanl habit of lieing
whenever it shines on you, you think. Seems Didymoss happens to know more
than you think, & took personal offense at your foul habits & lies. Can't
say I blame him. There is something unlikeable about you, course that may
simply be the fact you lie & are qualified as a poltroon.
If you didn't believe the first 95 answers, why would you believe the
next 5?
Because you haven't given 95 answers., maybe 95 assertions/claims, but 0
answers. Maybe because you are a known liar??
DIFINO, but either one of the above works for me. Why complicate things
needlessly.
GFY.
ESAD & FOAD are indeed applicable to you, & if what the Seattle women say
is true, you can not in any circumstances GFY, so why beg?
John W
walksalone who wonders, did the military ever have a MOS for professional
liar, or was it they could not exceed the apex set by john w.
Snip lack of john w's response to prior information.
.
