| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
| Date: |
09 Jan 2004 01:43:12 PM |
| Object: |
Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
If you knew Hebrew's methology of genealogy, we are our forefather's seed,
and can be called by his namesake, heck Abiathar's full name was Abiathar
Ben Ahimelech, although admittingly the Bible has some 'contradictions' (as
most all, if not all, can be 'apologized'), this isn't a contradiction, it
is rather a misunderstanding of the reader. It was Abiathar just as Jesus
said.
"Jude" <Jude@nowhereman.boo> wrote in message
news:3UnAb.1700$rG.1566@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
1 Samuel, Chapter 21
"1": Then came David to Nob to Ahimelech the priest: and Ahimelech was
afraid at the meeting of David, and said unto him, Why art thou alone, and
no man with thee? "2": And David said unto Ahimelech the priest, The king
hath commanded me a business, and hath said unto me, Let no man know any
thing of the business whereabout I send thee, and what I have commanded
thee: and I have appointed my servants to such and such a place. "3": Now
therefore what is under thine hand? give me five loaves of bread in mine
hand, or what there is present. "4": And the priest answered David, and
said, There is no common bread under mine hand, but there is hallowed
bread;
if the young men have kept themselves at least from women. "5": And David
answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have been kept
from
us about these three days, since I came out, and the vessels of the young
men are holy, and the bread is in a manner common, yea, though it were
sanctified this day in the vessel. "6": So the priest gave him hallowed
bread: for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was taken from
before the LORD, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken away.
(According to Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest who fed David the bread.)
1 Samuel, Chapter 22
"20": And one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, named Abiathar,
escaped, and fled after David.
(According to Samuel, Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech.)
Mark, Chapter 2
"25": And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did, when he
had
need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him? "26": How he
went
into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and did eat
the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and gave
also
to them which were with him? "27": And he said unto them, The sabbath was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
(According to Mark, Jesus says Abiathar was high priest who fed David the
bread.)
--
!!! I BELIEVE in God. The bible is a valuable book but is NOT inerrant !!!
.
|
|
| User: "Jude" |
|
| Title: Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
09 Jan 2004 07:14:42 PM |
|
|
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:vvu12gk93dbi54@corp.supernews.com...
If you knew Hebrew's methology of genealogy, we are our forefather's seed,
and can be called by his namesake, heck Abiathar's full name was Abiathar
Ben Ahimelech, although admittingly the Bible has some 'contradictions'
(as
most all, if not all, can be 'apologized'), this isn't a contradiction, it
is rather a misunderstanding of the reader. It was Abiathar just as Jesus
said.
How do you know it was Abiathar and that it WAS Jesus who said it? I have
to respectfully disagree with what you said. I do understand what you're
saying about us being our forefather's seed etc. The writer "Mark" didn't
get it right. Literally, in 1 Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest. His son
doesn't take his place yet, right? I understand Abiathar Ben Ahimelech (as
well as the usage of Bat Ahimelech for women) but Mark says that Jesus said
it was Abiathar and Samuel says it was Ahimelech. The usage of father as
son or vice versa doesn't apply in this case, in my opinion. Now, I could
be wrong. I just don't believe so. Were they priests at the same time? Did
they have different titles such as high priest, etc.? If you could point me
to anything that I can better understand that using a father and son's name
interchangeably when it comes to the description of somone performing an act
such as the one towards David, I'll concede the point.
"Jude" <Jude@nowhereman.boo> wrote in message
news:3UnAb.1700$rG.1566@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
1 Samuel, Chapter 21
"1": Then came David to Nob to Ahimelech the priest: and Ahimelech was
afraid at the meeting of David, and said unto him, Why art thou alone,
and
no man with thee? "2": And David said unto Ahimelech the priest, The
king
hath commanded me a business, and hath said unto me, Let no man know any
thing of the business whereabout I send thee, and what I have commanded
thee: and I have appointed my servants to such and such a place. "3":
Now
therefore what is under thine hand? give me five loaves of bread in mine
hand, or what there is present. "4": And the priest answered David, and
said, There is no common bread under mine hand, but there is hallowed
bread;
if the young men have kept themselves at least from women. "5": And
David
answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have been kept
from
us about these three days, since I came out, and the vessels of the
young
men are holy, and the bread is in a manner common, yea, though it were
sanctified this day in the vessel. "6": So the priest gave him hallowed
bread: for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was taken
from
before the LORD, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken away.
(According to Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest who fed David the bread.)
1 Samuel, Chapter 22
"20": And one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, named
Abiathar,
escaped, and fled after David.
(According to Samuel, Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech.)
Mark, Chapter 2
"25": And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did, when he
had
need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him? "26": How he
went
into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and did
eat
the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and gave
also
to them which were with him? "27": And he said unto them, The sabbath
was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
(According to Mark, Jesus says Abiathar was high priest who fed David
the
bread.)
--
!!! I BELIEVE in God. The bible is a valuable book but is NOT inerrant
!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
10 Jan 2004 07:05:17 PM |
|
|
You are free to your opinion
"Jude" <Jude@twinkletwinkle.star> wrote in message
news:GkILb.7421$K6.5567@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:vvu12gk93dbi54@corp.supernews.com...
If you knew Hebrew's methology of genealogy, we are our forefather's
seed,
and can be called by his namesake, heck Abiathar's full name was
Abiathar
Ben Ahimelech, although admittingly the Bible has some 'contradictions'
(as
most all, if not all, can be 'apologized'), this isn't a contradiction,
it
is rather a misunderstanding of the reader. It was Abiathar just as
Jesus
said.
How do you know it was Abiathar and that it WAS Jesus who said it? I have
to respectfully disagree with what you said. I do understand what you're
saying about us being our forefather's seed etc. The writer "Mark" didn't
get it right. Literally, in 1 Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest. His son
doesn't take his place yet, right? I understand Abiathar Ben Ahimelech
(as
well as the usage of Bat Ahimelech for women) but Mark says that Jesus
said
it was Abiathar and Samuel says it was Ahimelech. The usage of father as
son or vice versa doesn't apply in this case, in my opinion. Now, I could
be wrong. I just don't believe so. Were they priests at the same time?
Did
they have different titles such as high priest, etc.? If you could point
me
to anything that I can better understand that using a father and son's
name
interchangeably when it comes to the description of somone performing an
act
such as the one towards David, I'll concede the point.
"Jude" <Jude@nowhereman.boo> wrote in message
news:3UnAb.1700$rG.1566@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
1 Samuel, Chapter 21
"1": Then came David to Nob to Ahimelech the priest: and Ahimelech was
afraid at the meeting of David, and said unto him, Why art thou alone,
and
no man with thee? "2": And David said unto Ahimelech the priest, The
king
hath commanded me a business, and hath said unto me, Let no man know
any
thing of the business whereabout I send thee, and what I have
commanded
thee: and I have appointed my servants to such and such a place. "3":
Now
therefore what is under thine hand? give me five loaves of bread in
mine
hand, or what there is present. "4": And the priest answered David,
and
said, There is no common bread under mine hand, but there is hallowed
bread;
if the young men have kept themselves at least from women. "5": And
David
answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have been
kept
from
us about these three days, since I came out, and the vessels of the
young
men are holy, and the bread is in a manner common, yea, though it were
sanctified this day in the vessel. "6": So the priest gave him
hallowed
bread: for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was taken
from
before the LORD, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken away.
(According to Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest who fed David the
bread.)
1 Samuel, Chapter 22
"20": And one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, named
Abiathar,
escaped, and fled after David.
(According to Samuel, Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech.)
Mark, Chapter 2
"25": And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did, when
he
had
need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him? "26": How
he
went
into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and did
eat
the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and
gave
also
to them which were with him? "27": And he said unto them, The sabbath
was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
(According to Mark, Jesus says Abiathar was high priest who fed David
the
bread.)
--
!!! I BELIEVE in God. The bible is a valuable book but is NOT inerrant
!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude" |
|
| Title: Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
11 Jan 2004 05:46:48 AM |
|
|
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:10018a9t0vc8ia1@corp.supernews.com...
You are free to your opinion
This is true...
"Jude" <Jude@twinkletwinkle.star> wrote in message
news:GkILb.7421$K6.5567@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:vvu12gk93dbi54@corp.supernews.com...
If you knew Hebrew's methology of genealogy, we are our forefather's
seed,
and can be called by his namesake, heck Abiathar's full name was
Abiathar
Ben Ahimelech, although admittingly the Bible has some
'contradictions'
(as
most all, if not all, can be 'apologized'), this isn't a
contradiction,
it
is rather a misunderstanding of the reader. It was Abiathar just as
Jesus
said.
How do you know it was Abiathar and that it WAS Jesus who said it? I
have
to respectfully disagree with what you said. I do understand what
you're
saying about us being our forefather's seed etc. The writer "Mark"
didn't
get it right. Literally, in 1 Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest. His son
doesn't take his place yet, right? I understand Abiathar Ben Ahimelech
(as
well as the usage of Bat Ahimelech for women) but Mark says that Jesus
said
it was Abiathar and Samuel says it was Ahimelech. The usage of father
as
son or vice versa doesn't apply in this case, in my opinion. Now, I
could
be wrong. I just don't believe so. Were they priests at the same time?
Did
they have different titles such as high priest, etc.? If you could
point
me
to anything that I can better understand that using a father and son's
name
interchangeably when it comes to the description of somone performing an
act
such as the one towards David, I'll concede the point.
"Jude" <Jude@nowhereman.boo> wrote in message
news:3UnAb.1700$rG.1566@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
1 Samuel, Chapter 21
"1": Then came David to Nob to Ahimelech the priest: and Ahimelech
was
afraid at the meeting of David, and said unto him, Why art thou
alone,
and
no man with thee? "2": And David said unto Ahimelech the priest, The
king
hath commanded me a business, and hath said unto me, Let no man know
any
thing of the business whereabout I send thee, and what I have
commanded
thee: and I have appointed my servants to such and such a place.
"3":
Now
therefore what is under thine hand? give me five loaves of bread in
mine
hand, or what there is present. "4": And the priest answered David,
and
said, There is no common bread under mine hand, but there is
hallowed
bread;
if the young men have kept themselves at least from women. "5": And
David
answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have been
kept
from
us about these three days, since I came out, and the vessels of the
young
men are holy, and the bread is in a manner common, yea, though it
were
sanctified this day in the vessel. "6": So the priest gave him
hallowed
bread: for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was
taken
from
before the LORD, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken away.
(According to Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest who fed David the
bread.)
1 Samuel, Chapter 22
"20": And one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, named
Abiathar,
escaped, and fled after David.
(According to Samuel, Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech.)
Mark, Chapter 2
"25": And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did, when
he
had
need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him? "26": How
he
went
into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and
did
eat
the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and
gave
also
to them which were with him? "27": And he said unto them, The
sabbath
was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
(According to Mark, Jesus says Abiathar was high priest who fed
David
the
bread.)
--
!!! I BELIEVE in God. The bible is a valuable book but is NOT
inerrant
!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
13 Jan 2004 09:25:19 PM |
|
|
As a mystic, I trust the Holy Spirit, and believe that truth is spiritually
relative to a person's situational-spiritual growth, in time we all come
around to the fuller/fullest truth, I am careful not to step on the Holy
Spirit's toes.
It is political issues that I am inclined to get hot about (except when one
accuses me of being absolutely wrong while they are absolutely correct; this
doesn't seem to happen between us, I think because you are a bit of a
mystic, yourself :-)
"Jude" <Jude@whattheheck.com> wrote in message
news:9FaMb.5998$v16.356@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:10018a9t0vc8ia1@corp.supernews.com...
You are free to your opinion
This is true...
"Jude" <Jude@twinkletwinkle.star> wrote in message
news:GkILb.7421$K6.5567@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:vvu12gk93dbi54@corp.supernews.com...
If you knew Hebrew's methology of genealogy, we are our forefather's
seed,
and can be called by his namesake, heck Abiathar's full name was
Abiathar
Ben Ahimelech, although admittingly the Bible has some
'contradictions'
(as
most all, if not all, can be 'apologized'), this isn't a
contradiction,
it
is rather a misunderstanding of the reader. It was Abiathar just as
Jesus
said.
How do you know it was Abiathar and that it WAS Jesus who said it? I
have
to respectfully disagree with what you said. I do understand what
you're
saying about us being our forefather's seed etc. The writer "Mark"
didn't
get it right. Literally, in 1 Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest. His
son
doesn't take his place yet, right? I understand Abiathar Ben
Ahimelech
(as
well as the usage of Bat Ahimelech for women) but Mark says that
Jesus
said
it was Abiathar and Samuel says it was Ahimelech. The usage of father
as
son or vice versa doesn't apply in this case, in my opinion. Now, I
could
be wrong. I just don't believe so. Were they priests at the same
time?
Did
they have different titles such as high priest, etc.? If you could
point
me
to anything that I can better understand that using a father and son's
name
interchangeably when it comes to the description of somone performing
an
act
such as the one towards David, I'll concede the point.
"Jude" <Jude@nowhereman.boo> wrote in message
news:3UnAb.1700$rG.1566@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
1 Samuel, Chapter 21
"1": Then came David to Nob to Ahimelech the priest: and Ahimelech
was
afraid at the meeting of David, and said unto him, Why art thou
alone,
and
no man with thee? "2": And David said unto Ahimelech the priest,
The
king
hath commanded me a business, and hath said unto me, Let no man
know
any
thing of the business whereabout I send thee, and what I have
commanded
thee: and I have appointed my servants to such and such a place.
"3":
Now
therefore what is under thine hand? give me five loaves of bread
in
mine
hand, or what there is present. "4": And the priest answered
David,
and
said, There is no common bread under mine hand, but there is
hallowed
bread;
if the young men have kept themselves at least from women. "5":
And
David
answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have been
kept
from
us about these three days, since I came out, and the vessels of
the
young
men are holy, and the bread is in a manner common, yea, though it
were
sanctified this day in the vessel. "6": So the priest gave him
hallowed
bread: for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was
taken
from
before the LORD, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken
away.
(According to Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest who fed David the
bread.)
1 Samuel, Chapter 22
"20": And one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, named
Abiathar,
escaped, and fled after David.
(According to Samuel, Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech.)
Mark, Chapter 2
"25": And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did,
when
he
had
need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him? "26":
How
he
went
into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and
did
eat
the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and
gave
also
to them which were with him? "27": And he said unto them, The
sabbath
was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
(According to Mark, Jesus says Abiathar was high priest who fed
David
the
bread.)
--
!!! I BELIEVE in God. The bible is a valuable book but is NOT
inerrant
!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude" |
|
| Title: Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
14 Jan 2004 03:40:13 PM |
|
|
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1009dki6uuefsc6@corp.supernews.com...
As a mystic, I trust the Holy Spirit, and believe that truth is
spiritually
relative to a person's situational-spiritual growth, in time we all come
around to the fuller/fullest truth, I am careful not to step on the Holy
Spirit's toes.
It is political issues that I am inclined to get hot about (except when
one
accuses me of being absolutely wrong while they are absolutely correct;
this
doesn't seem to happen between us, I think because you are a bit of a
mystic, yourself :-)
:-) Who is this guy, America, that you're in the midst of political
debates?
The funny thing about my newsgroup is that I can only see your response at
lot of times when you're in a debate. When I open one of your posts, I can
see their words that you've responded to but not their original post. I
think I'm only downloading about 1/3 of all the posts. That's what you get
when you get a free newsserver, I guess.
"Jude" <Jude@whattheheck.com> wrote in message
news:9FaMb.5998$v16.356@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:10018a9t0vc8ia1@corp.supernews.com...
You are free to your opinion
This is true...
"Jude" <Jude@twinkletwinkle.star> wrote in message
news:GkILb.7421$K6.5567@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in
message
news:vvu12gk93dbi54@corp.supernews.com...
If you knew Hebrew's methology of genealogy, we are our
forefather's
seed,
and can be called by his namesake, heck Abiathar's full name was
Abiathar
Ben Ahimelech, although admittingly the Bible has some
'contradictions'
(as
most all, if not all, can be 'apologized'), this isn't a
contradiction,
it
is rather a misunderstanding of the reader. It was Abiathar just
as
Jesus
said.
How do you know it was Abiathar and that it WAS Jesus who said it?
I
have
to respectfully disagree with what you said. I do understand what
you're
saying about us being our forefather's seed etc. The writer "Mark"
didn't
get it right. Literally, in 1 Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest. His
son
doesn't take his place yet, right? I understand Abiathar Ben
Ahimelech
(as
well as the usage of Bat Ahimelech for women) but Mark says that
Jesus
said
it was Abiathar and Samuel says it was Ahimelech. The usage of
father
as
son or vice versa doesn't apply in this case, in my opinion. Now, I
could
be wrong. I just don't believe so. Were they priests at the same
time?
Did
they have different titles such as high priest, etc.? If you could
point
me
to anything that I can better understand that using a father and
son's
name
interchangeably when it comes to the description of somone
performing
an
act
such as the one towards David, I'll concede the point.
"Jude" <Jude@nowhereman.boo> wrote in message
news:3UnAb.1700$rG.1566@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
1 Samuel, Chapter 21
"1": Then came David to Nob to Ahimelech the priest: and
Ahimelech
was
afraid at the meeting of David, and said unto him, Why art thou
alone,
and
no man with thee? "2": And David said unto Ahimelech the priest,
The
king
hath commanded me a business, and hath said unto me, Let no man
know
any
thing of the business whereabout I send thee, and what I have
commanded
thee: and I have appointed my servants to such and such a place.
"3":
Now
therefore what is under thine hand? give me five loaves of bread
in
mine
hand, or what there is present. "4": And the priest answered
David,
and
said, There is no common bread under mine hand, but there is
hallowed
bread;
if the young men have kept themselves at least from women. "5":
And
David
answered the priest, and said unto him, Of a truth women have
been
kept
from
us about these three days, since I came out, and the vessels of
the
young
men are holy, and the bread is in a manner common, yea, though
it
were
sanctified this day in the vessel. "6": So the priest gave him
hallowed
bread: for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was
taken
from
before the LORD, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken
away.
(According to Samuel, Ahimelech is the priest who fed David the
bread.)
1 Samuel, Chapter 22
"20": And one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, named
Abiathar,
escaped, and fled after David.
(According to Samuel, Abiathar is the son of Ahimelech.)
Mark, Chapter 2
"25": And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did,
when
he
had
need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him? "26":
How
he
went
into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest,
and
did
eat
the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests,
and
gave
also
to them which were with him? "27": And he said unto them, The
sabbath
was
made for man, and not man for the sabbath:
(According to Mark, Jesus says Abiathar was high priest who fed
David
the
bread.)
--
!!! I BELIEVE in God. The bible is a valuable book but is NOT
inerrant
!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
17 Jan 2004 08:59:35 PM |
|
|
"Jude" <Jude@whattheheck.com> wrote in message
news:BDiNb.34978$v16.4933@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1009dki6uuefsc6@corp.supernews.com...
As a mystic, I trust the Holy Spirit, and believe that truth is
spiritually
relative to a person's situational-spiritual growth, in time we all come
around to the fuller/fullest truth, I am careful not to step on the Holy
Spirit's toes.
It is political issues that I am inclined to get hot about (except when
one
accuses me of being absolutely wrong while they are absolutely correct;
this
doesn't seem to happen between us, I think because you are a bit of a
mystic, yourself :-)
:-) Who is this guy, America,
A jerk
that you're in the midst of political
debates?
Yes, he's a conspiracy believer, and I 'm not
The funny thing about my newsgroup is that I can only see your response at
lot of times when you're in a debate. When I open one of your posts, I
can
see their words that you've responded to but not their original post. I
think I'm only downloading about 1/3 of all the posts. That's what you
get
when you get a free newsserver, I guess.
You are getting less than that, I snip out over 90 % of them, they are
Waaaaaayyyy too long, but you aren't missing much of anything
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jude" |
|
| Title: Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
18 Jan 2004 12:50:49 PM |
|
|
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:100jtkjp88u0c2c@corp.supernews.com...
"Jude" <Jude@whattheheck.com> wrote in message
news:BDiNb.34978$v16.4933@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1009dki6uuefsc6@corp.supernews.com...
As a mystic, I trust the Holy Spirit, and believe that truth is
spiritually
relative to a person's situational-spiritual growth, in time we all
come
around to the fuller/fullest truth, I am careful not to step on the
Holy
Spirit's toes.
It is political issues that I am inclined to get hot about (except
when
one
accuses me of being absolutely wrong while they are absolutely
correct;
this
doesn't seem to happen between us, I think because you are a bit of a
mystic, yourself :-)
:-) Who is this guy, America,
A jerk
....not to mention a pesky critter too, huh? lol
that you're in the midst of political
debates?
Yes, he's a conspiracy believer, and I 'm not
The funny thing about my newsgroup is that I can only see your response
at
lot of times when you're in a debate. When I open one of your posts, I
can
see their words that you've responded to but not their original post. I
think I'm only downloading about 1/3 of all the posts. That's what you
get
when you get a free newsserver, I guess.
You are getting less than that, I snip out over 90 % of them, they are
Waaaaaayyyy too long, but you aren't missing much of anything
<snip>
I hear that, as they say.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: a problem with consistency - 23 |
20 Jan 2004 08:44:50 AM |
|
|
Giggles :-)
"Jude" <Jude@whattheheck.com> wrote in message
news:OyAOb.21789$2L6.4238@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:100jtkjp88u0c2c@corp.supernews.com...
"Jude" <Jude@whattheheck.com> wrote in message
news:BDiNb.34978$v16.4933@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1009dki6uuefsc6@corp.supernews.com...
As a mystic, I trust the Holy Spirit, and believe that truth is
spiritually
relative to a person's situational-spiritual growth, in time we all
come
around to the fuller/fullest truth, I am careful not to step on the
Holy
Spirit's toes.
It is political issues that I am inclined to get hot about (except
when
one
accuses me of being absolutely wrong while they are absolutely
correct;
this
doesn't seem to happen between us, I think because you are a bit of
a
mystic, yourself :-)
:-) Who is this guy, America,
A jerk
...not to mention a pesky critter too, huh? lol
that you're in the midst of political
debates?
Yes, he's a conspiracy believer, and I 'm not
The funny thing about my newsgroup is that I can only see your
response
at
lot of times when you're in a debate. When I open one of your posts,
I
can
see their words that you've responded to but not their original post.
I
think I'm only downloading about 1/3 of all the posts. That's what
you
get
when you get a free newsserver, I guess.
You are getting less than that, I snip out over 90 % of them, they are
Waaaaaayyyy too long, but you aren't missing much of anything
<snip>
I hear that, as they say.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
