| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
09 Feb 2004 12:51:30 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Age of Aquarius |
In article <BC4CE195.35363126%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
Man doesn't go to hell because he sins. He may (most not in my
opinion) because he rejects or has rejected the single provision
made for him to escape it.
Does the Bible support this claim of yours? If so, where?
.
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
09 Feb 2004 02:25:11 PM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
Man doesn't go to hell because he sins. He may (most not in my
opinion) because he rejects or has rejected the single provision
made for him to escape it.
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
Does the Bible support this claim of yours? If so, where?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
Yes ... Genesis 1:1 - Revelation 22:21.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
09 Feb 2004 05:08:57 PM |
|
|
In article <BC4D56D6.35363314%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
Man doesn't go to hell because he sins. He may (most not in my
opinion) because he rejects or has rejected the single provision
made for him to escape it.
Yes ... Genesis 1:1 -
No, that does nothing to support your claim.
Revelation 22:21.
That doesn't either. You lose.
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
09 Feb 2004 07:43:26 PM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
Man doesn't go to hell because he sins. He may (most not in my
opinion) because he rejects or has rejected the single provision
made for him to escape it.
Yes ... Genesis 1:1 -
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
No, that does nothing to support your claim.
Revelation 22:21.
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
That doesn't either. You lose.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
You cut out the entire center section. No wonder you donąt get it.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
09 Feb 2004 08:01:15 PM |
|
|
In article <BC4DA16E.35363492%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
Revelation 22:21.
That doesn't either. You lose.
You cut out the entire center section. No wonder you donąt get it.
You haven't answered the original question, moron. Saying that
the entire books answers it is a little vague and non-responsive.
Obviously you don't know the answer and you are trying to evade.
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
10 Feb 2004 06:41:07 AM |
|
|
Revelation 22:21.
That doesn't either. You lose.
You cut out the entire center section. No wonder you donąt get it.
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
You haven't answered the original question, moron. Saying that the entire
books answers it is a little vague and non-responsive. Obviously you don't
know the answer and you are trying to evade.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I did answer the original question. It is in the Bible. Obviously you
haven't read or understood it. Little surprise there. People who don't know
who God is can't understand it.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
10 Feb 2004 12:18:22 PM |
|
|
In article <BC4E3B92.3536368C%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> lied:
I did answer the original question. It is in the Bible.
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
10 Feb 2004 02:49:49 PM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> lied:
I did answer the original question. It is in the Bible.
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
10 Feb 2004 04:06:56 PM |
|
|
In article <BC4EAE1C.353638C1%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man.
Then why does God make so many mistakes in it? This god of yours
thinks Pi is 3, Judas died two ways, and a good number of other
silly things. As gods go this one is really pathetic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
10 Feb 2004 07:03:59 PM |
|
|
fascinated us all by typing:
In article <BC4EAE1C.353638C1%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man.
Then why does God make so many mistakes in it? This god of yours
thinks Pi is 3, Judas died two ways, and a good number of other
silly things. As gods go this one is really pathetic.
Yahweh/Jehovah is a jerkoff, and the Old Testament is packed with evidence
of it. Vagrak or Thor could kick his ***** without trying.
--
Robert "Buchannibal" Buchanan
http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/
"What is real is not the external form, but the essence of things...it is
impossible for anyone to express anything essentially real by imitating its
exterior surface."
-Constantin Brancusi
Scott A. Gilbert explains my demise to me via e-mail:
"You are a fucking moron, and just as soon as your idiotic website and/or
e-mail company gives you up to the FBI (yes, asswipe - you were reported);
you are going to get slammed."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Georgann posts another lie |
10 Feb 2004 04:04:42 PM |
|
|
In article <BC4EAE1C.353638C1%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
My answer was not evasive.
You are lying.
The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other than to speak
of God's will and His relationship to man.
Again with the lame excuses. You obviously have never read the
thing, georgann, nor do you have any idea where it came from.
Now do you want to answer my question or will you continue just
being an obtuse lying *****?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Georgann posts another lie |
10 Feb 2004 07:02:52 PM |
|
|
fascinated us all by typing:
In article <BC4EAE1C.353638C1%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
My answer was not evasive.
You are lying.
The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other than to speak
of God's will and His relationship to man.
Again with the lame excuses. You obviously have never read the
thing, georgann, nor do you have any idea where it came from.
Now do you want to answer my question or will you continue just
being an obtuse lying *****?
Has she ever been any other way?
--
Robert "Buchannibal" Buchanan
http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/
"What is real is not the external form, but the essence of things...it is
impossible for anyone to express anything essentially real by imitating its
exterior surface."
-Constantin Brancusi
Scott A. Gilbert explains my demise to me via e-mail:
"You are a fucking moron, and just as soon as your idiotic website and/or
e-mail company gives you up to the FBI (yes, asswipe - you were reported);
you are going to get slammed."
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Georgann posts another lie |
10 Feb 2004 07:10:27 PM |
|
|
In article <40297f3b$0$82558$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>,
Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> wrote:
Now do you want to answer my question or will you continue just
being an obtuse lying *****?
Has she ever been any other way?
I lack data on that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Georgann posts another lie |
11 Feb 2004 06:10:08 AM |
|
|
Now do you want to answer my question or will you continue just
being an obtuse lying *****?
Has she ever been any other way?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I lack data on that.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
From where I sit, you lack sufficient integrity on that.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Georgann posts another lie |
11 Feb 2004 08:32:32 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:10:08 +0000, georgann
posted:
Now do you want to answer my question or will you continue just being
an obtuse lying *****?
Has she ever been any other way?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I lack data on that.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
From where I sit, you lack sufficient integrity on that.
Guess: "You're sitting in Hell".
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Georgann posts another lie |
11 Feb 2004 01:56:56 PM |
|
|
In article <BC4F85D0.35363C37%chenault@mindspring.com>, georgann
<chenault@mindspring.com> tried to evade the issues with:
From where I sit, you lack sufficient integrity on that.
Considering your lies I don't give a ***** about your opinions
on my integrity. In case you haven't figured it out yet this
thread is about *your* claims and their inconsistancies. So
far you haven't even answered the one about the deaths of
Judas.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: Georgann posts another lie |
12 Feb 2004 12:03:14 AM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<BC4F85D0.35363C37%chenault@mindspring.com>...
Now do you want to answer my question or will you continue just
being an obtuse lying *****?
Has she ever been any other way?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I lack data on that.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
From where I sit, you lack sufficient integrity on that.
You mean from your sinful position of adultery?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Phillips" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 08:22:17 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, georgann wrote:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> lied:
I did answer the original question. It is in the Bible.
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who
has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept
with a man" (Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing
all of those people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
--
Jim Phillips, jphillip at bcpl dot net
"If you have chicken at lunch and chicken at dinner, do you ever
wonder if the two chickens knew each other?" -- George Carlin
.
|
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 04:54:19 PM |
|
|
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 05:25:07 PM |
|
|
And so upon Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:54:19 +0000 didst georgann speak thusly:
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
So you're comfortable with genocide and mass murder?
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
Do you know that's ***** written after the fact to justify a slaughter?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 12:42:36 PM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote in alt.atheism
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
So you're comfortable with genocide and mass murder?
The injuns' deserved everything they got, for putting up a fight!
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 05:50:57 PM |
|
|
In article <BC501CCA.35363EF1%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
That figures. Killing, rape, and torture is what you god is known
for. I'm quite happy that your god doesn't really exist. Too bad
belief in it is still used as an excuse for hatred.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Starshine Moonbeam" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 01:07:44 AM |
|
|
In article <BC501CCA.35363EF1%chenault@mindspring.com>,
"georgann"(chenault@mindspring.com) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
Not enough vending machines and no playstation.
--
mhm 31x9
Smeeter #28, 29, or 30
WSD #30
Skep-ti-cult ID# 365-12149-907
Alcatroll Labs Inc. (Division of Incendiary Devices)
StArSHiNe_MoOnbEAm aT HoTMaIL DoT cOM
http://www.geocities.com/tobydog9
"Technology is getting better and that's fine but most of the time,
all you need is a stick of gum, a pocketknife, and a smile."
-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"
"You can run but you'll just die tired and buttered."
-- Ryannosaurus
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter J Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
11 Feb 2004 06:47:00 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:54:19 GMT, georgann wrote:
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in
God's eyes?
Yes, they were unrepentant sinners, just like you.
--
PJR :-)
(Remove NOSPAM to reply)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Phillips" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:37:05 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, georgann wrote:
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
I asked you what part of the Bible. Your answer was evasive.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
My answer was not evasive. The whole of the Bible has no other purpose other
than to speak of God's will and His relationship to man. If you don't know
that its not my problem.
"Jim Phillips" wrote:
So when god said "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept
with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"
(Numbers 31:17-18) you have absolutely no problem with killing all of those
people simply because the bible claims god said it was okay?
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
*All* of them except for the virgin girls? Why do you suppose god
said it was okay to spare the virgin girls, and what did he mean when he
said "save for yourselves"? You honestly don't have a problem with this?
Do you really believe this to be the action of a kind and loving god?
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites in God's eyes?
I can't imagine anything that would require *every* human being
except for virgin girls to be killed. What do you think was wrong?
--
Jim Phillips, jphillip at bcpl dot net
"If you have chicken at lunch and chicken at dinner, do you ever
wonder if the two chickens knew each other?" -- George Carlin
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 12:41:16 PM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Wow, an admission that genocide is sometimes a good thing, in
the eyes of georgann's god. She'd make a good oven-lighter for
the furnaces in hell, or maybe as a follower of a hitler-like savior
or king.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites
in God's eyes?
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped,
or the god that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into
the same basket of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized
and killed, shipped off to concentration camps and reservations, all
because they didn't want to bow down to your god Jesus and his
band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually seem to believe that
the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he had to
pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such
a far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 01:02:49 PM |
|
|
Elroy Willis fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Wow, an admission that genocide is sometimes a good thing, in
the eyes of georgann's god. She'd make a good oven-lighter for
the furnaces in hell, or maybe as a follower of a hitler-like savior
or king.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites
in God's eyes?
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped,
or the god that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into
the same basket of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized
and killed, shipped off to concentration camps and reservations, all
because they didn't want to bow down to your god Jesus and his
band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually seem to believe that
the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he had to
pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such
a far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
She's STUPID. She'll believe anything in that nutty book.
--
Robert Buchanan
http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/
"We want a simpler and more melodic style for music, a simple, less
complicated emotional state, and dissonance again relegated to its proper
place as one element of music...I think we have gone as far as we are
likely to go in the direction of size, or dissonance, or complexity of
music. Music, in other words, has definitely reached and passed the
greatest degree of discord and complexity that can be attained in practice.
I want nothing better, more flexible or more complete than the sonata form,
which contains everything necessary for my structural purposes."
-Sergei Prokofiev
Scott "Son of Chaney" Gilbert puts a price on my head:
Still wanted to buy - address of Robert Buchanan (sockpuppet name Uncle
Whoopass). Name your price, but the address has to be 100% correct. This
offer is quite serious - if you know this fucktard and want to make some
serious coin, contact me."
<vbtWb.18092$Ch.2141@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:28:07 PM |
|
|
And so upon Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:02:49 +0000 didst Robert Buchanan speak
thusly:
Elroy Willis fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote in alt.atheism
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
I have no problem with God telling the Jews to wipe out the Canaanites
however He told them to do it.
Wow, an admission that genocide is sometimes a good thing, in
the eyes of georgann's god. She'd make a good oven-lighter for
the furnaces in hell, or maybe as a follower of a hitler-like savior
or king.
Do you have any idea what the problem was with the Canaanites
in God's eyes?
Yeah, they didn't worship the same god that their foes worshipped,
or the god that the priests were trying to force on people.
Woe to them, and woe to the american natives who fell into
the same basket of barbarism as did the Canaanites. Brutalized
and killed, shipped off to concentration camps and reservations, all
because they didn't want to bow down to your god Jesus and his
band of bloodthirsty god-followers, who actually seem to believe that
the creator of the entire universe was so jealous that he had to
pretend to be dead for three days in order to forgive people.
Give me a break, georgann. How can you actually believe in such
a far-fetched tale of universal injustice?
She's STUPID. She'll believe anything in that nutty book.
Hell, she doesn't even actually believe that book, she makes the crap up
as she goes along...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:37:07 PM |
|
|
In article <pan.2004.02.13.02.28.06.757202@hoo.com-amikchi>,
Mark K. Bilbo <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
Hell, she doesn't even actually believe that book, she makes the crap up
as she goes along...
Exactly!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 10:35:55 PM |
|
|
And so upon Fri, 13 Feb 2004 02:37:07 +0000 didst ellis speak thusly:
In article <pan.2004.02.13.02.28.06.757202@hoo.com-amikchi>,
Mark K. Bilbo <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
Hell, she doesn't even actually believe that book, she makes the crap up
as she goes along...
Exactly!
She's figuratively literal...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 01:19:20 PM |
|
|
In article <402bcdd8$0$82558$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>,
Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> wrote:
She's STUPID.
No *****, sherlock.
She'll believe anything in that nutty book.
Actually she'd have to read it first. From what I can
see she doesn't appear to read it at all; there's someone
telling her what it "says" and she fits that to what
she wants to believe.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
