| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
12 Feb 2004 05:35:18 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Age of Aquarius |
In article <BC5170AF.353643A7%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
How lame is it of you to suggest that this reference is
literally "seeing" and not envisioning?
How lame is it of you to go from literal and back depending on
what you want it to mean? Either the Bible is the literal truth
or it is not; you cannot have it both ways.
.
|
|
| User: "georgann" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 06:36:01 PM |
|
|
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
How lame is it of you to suggest that this reference is literally "seeing"
and not envisioning?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
How lame is it of you to go from literal and back depending on what you want
it to mean? Either the Bible is the literal truth or it is not; you cannot
have it both ways.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
You don't want literal. You'd have to understand Hebrew / Aramaic and Greek
all in considerable depth to understand what the Bible says. You evidently
prefer to take pot shots at the English translations with no understanding
of the Middle-Eastern mind. Western thought doesn't get it done, lad.
--
(`'·.¸(`'·.¸(`'·.¸ ¸.·'´)¸.·'´)¸.·'´)
«´¨`·.¸¸ ¸¸.·´¨ `»
All your prophecy are belong to Christ!
(¸.·'´(¸.·'´(¸.·'´ `'·.¸)`'·.¸)`'·.¸)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 06:44:26 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:36:01 +0000, georgann
posted:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
How lame is it of you to suggest that this reference is literally
"seeing" and not envisioning?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
How lame is it of you to go from literal and back depending on what you
want it to mean? Either the Bible is the literal truth or it is not;
you cannot have it both ways.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
You don't want literal. You'd have to understand Hebrew / Aramaic and
Greek all in considerable depth to understand what the Bible says. You
evidently prefer to take pot shots at the English translations with no
understanding of the Middle-Eastern mind. Western thought doesn't get it
done, lad. --
Why would human tought be different from one region to another?
Local superstitions differ of course, that's why they are superstitions.
Are you some kind of racist or so?
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:19:13 PM |
|
|
In article <BC51861F.35364438%chenault@mindspring.com>,
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
You don't want literal.
But you do when it suits you. That's one of the reasons
I consider you dishonest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
14 Feb 2004 09:19:20 AM |
|
|
() wrote in alt.atheism
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
You don't want literal.
But you do when it suits you.
Like the talking serpent part, among others.
That's one of the reasons I consider you dishonest.
Yep.
A hypocrite if I've ever seen one.
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 07:09:53 PM |
|
|
georgann fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
How lame is it of you to suggest that this reference is literally
"seeing" and not envisioning?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
How lame is it of you to go from literal and back depending on what
you want it to mean? Either the Bible is the literal truth or it is
not; you cannot have it both ways.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
You don't want literal. You'd have to understand Hebrew / Aramaic and
Greek all in considerable depth to understand what the Bible says. You
evidently prefer to take pot shots at the English translations with no
understanding of the Middle-Eastern mind. Western thought doesn't get
it done, lad.
So should I pour some sand in my shorts, arm myself with an AK-47, and find
a religion which encourages the mass slaughter of non-adherents? Because
those tend to be principle values of the "Middle-Eastern mind." Laddie.
Sorry, but Judeo-Christan and Muslim theology are a bit beneath my notice.
--
Robert Buchanan
http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/
"We want a simpler and more melodic style for music, a simple, less
complicated emotional state, and dissonance again relegated to its proper
place as one element of music...I think we have gone as far as we are
likely to go in the direction of size, or dissonance, or complexity of
music. Music, in other words, has definitely reached and passed the
greatest degree of discord and complexity that can be attained in practice.
I want nothing better, more flexible or more complete than the sonata form,
which contains everything necessary for my structural purposes."
-Sergei Prokofiev
Scott "Son of Chaney" Gilbert puts a price on my head:
Still wanted to buy - address of Robert Buchanan (sockpuppet name Uncle
Whoopass). Name your price, but the address has to be 100% correct. This
offer is quite serious - if you know this fucktard and want to make some
serious coin, contact me."
<vbtWb.18092$Ch.2141@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Flonkenstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 08:12:44 PM |
|
|
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:09:53 +0000, Robert
Buchanan posted:
georgann fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
How lame is it of you to suggest that this reference is literally
"seeing" and not envisioning?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
How lame is it of you to go from literal and back depending on what you
want it to mean? Either the Bible is the literal truth or it is not;
you cannot have it both ways.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
You don't want literal. You'd have to understand Hebrew / Aramaic and
Greek all in considerable depth to understand what the Bible says. You
evidently prefer to take pot shots at the English translations with no
understanding of the Middle-Eastern mind. Western thought doesn't get it
done, lad.
So should I pour some sand in my shorts, arm myself with an AK-47, and
find a religion which encourages the mass slaughter of non-adherents?
Because those tend to be principle values of the "Middle-Eastern mind."
Laddie. Sorry, but Judeo-Christan and Muslim theology are a bit beneath my
notice.
I agree with this pôast!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 09:21:38 PM |
|
|
Dr. Flonkenstein fascinated us all by typing:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:09:53 +0000, Robert
Buchanan posted:
georgann fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
How lame is it of you to suggest that this reference is literally
"seeing" and not envisioning?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
How lame is it of you to go from literal and back depending on what
you want it to mean? Either the Bible is the literal truth or it
is not; you cannot have it both ways.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
You don't want literal. You'd have to understand Hebrew / Aramaic
and Greek all in considerable depth to understand what the Bible
says. You evidently prefer to take pot shots at the English
translations with no understanding of the Middle-Eastern mind.
Western thought doesn't get it done, lad.
So should I pour some sand in my shorts, arm myself with an AK-47,
and find a religion which encourages the mass slaughter of
non-adherents? Because those tend to be principle values of the
"Middle-Eastern mind." Laddie. Sorry, but Judeo-Christan and Muslim
theology are a bit beneath my notice.
I agree with this pôast!!
ADN FSCK TEH FUCKNOZZLES AND THIER JEEOHSHEESH BULLSHITE!!!!111!!!11
--
Robert Buchanan
http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/
"We want a simpler and more melodic style for music, a simple, less
complicated emotional state, and dissonance again relegated to its proper
place as one element of music...I think we have gone as far as we are
likely to go in the direction of size, or dissonance, or complexity of
music. Music, in other words, has definitely reached and passed the
greatest degree of discord and complexity that can be attained in practice.
I want nothing better, more flexible or more complete than the sonata form,
which contains everything necessary for my structural purposes."
-Sergei Prokofiev
Scott "Son of Chaney" Gilbert puts a price on my head:
Still wanted to buy - address of Robert Buchanan (sockpuppet name Uncle
Whoopass). Name your price, but the address has to be 100% correct. This
offer is quite serious - if you know this fucktard and want to make some
serious coin, contact me."
<vbtWb.18092$Ch.2141@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Baldwin" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 11:57:38 AM |
|
|
Robert Buchanan wrote:
Dr. Flonkenstein fascinated us all by typing:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:09:53 +0000, Robert
Buchanan posted:
georgann fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
How lame is it of you to suggest that this reference is literally
"seeing" and not envisioning?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
How lame is it of you to go from literal and back depending on what
you want it to mean? Either the Bible is the literal truth or it
is not; you cannot have it both ways.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
You don't want literal. You'd have to understand Hebrew / Aramaic
and Greek all in considerable depth to understand what the Bible
says. You evidently prefer to take pot shots at the English
translations with no understanding of the Middle-Eastern mind.
Western thought doesn't get it done, lad.
So should I pour some sand in my shorts, arm myself with an AK-47,
and find a religion which encourages the mass slaughter of
non-adherents? Because those tend to be principle values of the
"Middle-Eastern mind." Laddie. Sorry, but Judeo-Christan and Muslim
theology are a bit beneath my notice.
I agree with this pôast!!
ADN FSCK TEH FUCKNOZZLES AND THIER JEEOHSHEESH BULLSHITE!!!!111!!!11
Great, now Nozzy is going to remove alt.atheism too. Way to blow it for
everyone.
--
Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design*
"I have always thought that the reason Dinosaurs were so big is because
of the dramatic difference in gravitational strength between that time
period and now" -Edmo the paleontologist
"If the whole group must be ruined to prevent that, so be it. Few if
anyone comes to my defense, so why the hell should I care if they have a
good place to post ?" -Foamy Bartmo, Phyrric meteorologist
"Christ was just an enlightened person, not unlike me." -Edmo the humble
"I am an authority, and I do not force my views on others like you do."
-Edmo, enemy of Irony Meters all over Usenet
"It's not Latin, clueless wannabe tryhard." -Fucknozzle Junior
discussing the phrase 'Illegimati non carborundum'(sic)
Hail the un-alive
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 04:35:19 PM |
|
|
Dan Baldwin fascinated us all by typing:
Robert Buchanan wrote:
Dr. Flonkenstein fascinated us all by typing:
Being tired of lurking, on Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:09:53 +0000, Robert
Buchanan posted:
georgann fascinated us all by typing:
georgann <chenault@mindspring.com> wrote:
How lame is it of you to suggest that this reference is literally
"seeing" and not envisioning?
"ellis@no.spam" wrote:
How lame is it of you to go from literal and back depending on what
you want it to mean? Either the Bible is the literal truth or it
is not; you cannot have it both ways.
georgann (forgiven since 33 AD) wrote:
You don't want literal. You'd have to understand Hebrew / Aramaic
and Greek all in considerable depth to understand what the Bible
says. You evidently prefer to take pot shots at the English
translations with no understanding of the Middle-Eastern mind.
Western thought doesn't get it done, lad.
So should I pour some sand in my shorts, arm myself with an AK-47,
and find a religion which encourages the mass slaughter of
non-adherents? Because those tend to be principle values of the
"Middle-Eastern mind." Laddie. Sorry, but Judeo-Christan and Muslim
theology are a bit beneath my notice.
I agree with this pôast!!
ADN FSCK TEH FUCKNOZZLES AND THIER JEEOHSHEESH BULLSHITE!!!!111!!!11
Great, now Nozzy is going to remove alt.atheism too. Way to blow it for
everyone.
At this rate, won't he eventually destroy all of Usenet?
--
Robert Buchanan
http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/
"We want a simpler and more melodic style for music, a simple, less
complicated emotional state, and dissonance again relegated to its proper
place as one element of music...I think we have gone as far as we are
likely to go in the direction of size, or dissonance, or complexity of
music. Music, in other words, has definitely reached and passed the
greatest degree of discord and complexity that can be attained in practice.
I want nothing better, more flexible or more complete than the sonata form,
which contains everything necessary for my structural purposes."
-Sergei Prokofiev
Scott "Son of Chaney" Gilbert puts a price on my head:
Still wanted to buy - address of Robert Buchanan (sockpuppet name Uncle
Whoopass). Name your price, but the address has to be 100% correct. This
offer is quite serious - if you know this fucktard and want to make some
serious coin, contact me."
<vbtWb.18092$Ch.2141@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 04:48:28 PM |
|
|
In article <402d5126$0$5341$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>,
Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> wrote:
Great, now Nozzy is going to remove alt.atheism too. Way to blow it for
everyone.
At this rate, won't he eventually destroy all of Usenet?
He hasn't already done so?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Buchanan" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 05:31:46 PM |
|
|
fascinated us all by typing:
In article <402d5126$0$5341$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>,
Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> wrote:
Great, now Nozzy is going to remove alt.atheism too. Way to blow it for
everyone.
At this rate, won't he eventually destroy all of Usenet?
He hasn't already done so?
Ah, yes. I forgot. And none of us exist.
--
Robert Buchanan
http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/
"We want a simpler and more melodic style for music, a simple, less
complicated emotional state, and dissonance again relegated to its proper
place as one element of music...I think we have gone as far as we are
likely to go in the direction of size, or dissonance, or complexity of
music. Music, in other words, has definitely reached and passed the
greatest degree of discord and complexity that can be attained in practice.
I want nothing better, more flexible or more complete than the sonata form,
which contains everything necessary for my structural purposes."
-Sergei Prokofiev
Scott "Son of Chaney" Gilbert puts a price on my head:
Still wanted to buy - address of Robert Buchanan (sockpuppet name Uncle
Whoopass). Name your price, but the address has to be 100% correct. This
offer is quite serious - if you know this fucktard and want to make some
serious coin, contact me."
<vbtWb.18092$Ch.2141@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
13 Feb 2004 05:33:46 PM |
|
|
And so upon Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:48:28 +0000 didst ellis speak thusly:
In article <402d5126$0$5341$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>,
Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> wrote:
Great, now Nozzy is going to remove alt.atheism too. Way to blow it for
everyone.
At this rate, won't he eventually destroy all of Usenet?
He hasn't already done so?
And how could we tell?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "starwars" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
19 Feb 2004 03:31:57 AM |
|
|
Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in news:402d5e61$0$5341
$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net:
fascinated us all by typing:
In article <402d5126$0$5341$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net>,
Robert Buchanan <?????????@?????????.???> wrote:
Great, now Nozzy is going to remove alt.atheism too. Way to blow it for
everyone.
At this rate, won't he eventually destroy all of Usenet?
He hasn't already done so?
Ah, yes. I forgot. And none of us exist.
nope
--
Pat Ponciano, C.A.S.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Dark" |
|
| Title: Re: Age of Aquarius |
12 Feb 2004 11:10:23 PM |
|
|
georgann:
You don't want literal. You'd have to understand Hebrew / Aramaic and Greek
all in considerable depth to understand what the Bible says. You evidently
prefer to take pot shots at the English translations with no understanding
of the Middle-Eastern mind. Western thought doesn't get it done, lad.
The voice tell me that you are very wrong and that your soul
is in mortal peril.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
