Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary



 Religions > Bible > Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "Al Green"
Date: 24 Aug 2003 07:48:47 PM
Object: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary
Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a "Christian"
would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you think
Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?
Al
"John W" <john_w@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:v1dhkvcd803120lg1u4sh4iuck2dvdsd5d@4ax.com...

On 21 Aug 2003 09:42:10 -0700,

(Al) wrote:

Here's another article that might help, Ron.


This is a baptist group. Kindly stop posting your feces about Mary,
who was no eternal Virgin.

John W

_______________________________

http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/general/theotokosq&a.htm

An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary

A Protestant preacher recently said that devotion to the Mother of God
is the cause of all bad in the world, since she was not a virgin after
she gave birth to Christ and was just another woman. This really has
upset me. Why do we worship the Virgin Mary and how do we answer those
who say that she was nothing but another woman? What significance does
she have for us Orthodox? (B.W., TX)

One cannot react to every opinion and idea about Christianity. At some
point, common sense must prevail. In the first place, the idea that
devotion to the Theotokos, or Bearer of God, is the cause of the
world&#8217;s ills is a ridiculous proposition. One must look at such
an idea with the same passivity that we show towards so-called
scholarly attempt to prove that Christian devotion to the Virgin Mary
derives from the pagan cult of the earth goddess. It does not deserve
a response. Secondly, while non-Orthodox Christian denominations may
differ with regard to their assessment of the significance of the
Mother of God, this does not explain the views of those who would like
to believe&#8212;an incredible, if not demonic thing&#8212;that a
woman chosen by the God of the universe to bear His Incarnate Son
would simply return, after this miraculous event, to the world of the
flesh. If St. Paul praises the chaste life, if Christians are called
to become eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom, and if, at least in the
Orthodox, Catholic, Anglican, and Lutheran Churches, monks and nuns
are called to uphold the standard of virginity and purity,* how could
any rational person suggest that the woman called to bear the Son of
God would be exempt from such a pious commitment?

We will not, here, comment on the mistranslation and misuse of
Scripture by which some heterodox try to claim that the Virgin Mary
was a virgin only "up to the time" of the Virgin Birth and not after,
or by which they rather naïvely understand the children of St. Joseph
(the Virgin Mary&#8217;s step-children) and their cousins to be the
literal "brothers and sisters" of Christ. The Fathers of the Church
have written at length on these matters. Suffice it to say that
ancient Christian tradition supported the idea that the Mother of God
was ever-virgin, just as Church Fathers and Councils condemned
heretics in the early Church who, like their counterparts today,
questioned the spiritual eminence of the Theotokos.

As for the very eminence of the Mother of God, let us turn to
Scripture. Going to the house of Zacharias, the Virgin Mary greeted
his wife, Elizabeth. "Filled with the Holy Spirit," St. Elizabeth
cried out, "Blessed art thou among women..." (St. Luke 1: 40-42). In
response, the Theotokos observes that "...henceforth all generations
shall call me blessed." It would, again, suggest a psychological or
spiritual problem of no small dimensions for anyone to believe that,
after these statements, the Virgin Mary would simply return to the
life of the flesh and set aside her spiritual role in the salvation
brought to mankind by Jesus Christ.

Finally, we Orthodox do not "worship" the Virgin Mary. We "venerate"
her and show her great honor. Nor have we ever, like the Latins,
developed the idea that the Theotokos was born without sin (the Roman
Catholic dogma of the Immaculate Conception) or that she is a
co-redemptor with Christ (the cult of the Redemtrix in the Latin
Church). The consensus of the Church Fathers rejects such ideas, and
the Orthodox Church adheres to that consensus. However, we do believe
that the Virgin Mary is an image, as St. Maximos the Confessor says,
of the Christian goal of becoming Christ-like, of theosis. Just as the
Theotokos gave birth to Christ in a bodily way, so we must, St.
Maximos tells us, give birth to Christ in an unbodily or spiritual
way. In so doing, we imitate her practical spiritual life, including
the purity and humility by which she formed her free will into perfect
obedience to the Will of God. Of this practical image of the Virgin
Mary, one of our readers, Archdeacon Basil Kuretich, D.D., has written
some words that bear repeating here. They give us a clear picture of
the importance of the model which she presents for every Orthodox
believer:

"We...are aware of the part played by Divine Grace in the Virgin
Mary&#8217;s life and are aware of the perfection of her virtue.
However, we cannot lose sight of the importance of free will in the
development and expression of her rich personality. After the
Annunication, she kept the secret of God&#8217;s plan for her; she
faced misunderstanding and accusation from others. She quickly visited
her cousin, Elizabeth, not thinking of her own needs, but only the
need of Elizabeth to share her joy. She endured the journey to
Bethlehem; she humbly prepared for the birth of her Child and
obediently accepted the command to flee into Egypt. The Virgin Mary,
aided by Divine Grace, carried out these actions in a real
world&#8212;with real effort and sacrifice. Thus she is for us a model
of many virtues."

*Although they may be familiar with monasticism in the Latin Church,
most Americans do not know that monastic brotherhoods and sisterhoods
survived in the Lutheran and Reformed movements, despite the generally
polemical attitude towards the monastic estate that marked the
Protestant Reformation. Over the years they have decreased in number
or have been absorbed into Roman Catholicism, as is the case in
Sweden, where most of the Lutheran monastic houses have succumbed to
the widespread proselytizing of German Jesuit missionaries in that
country.



______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - FAST UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD -

http://www.uncensored-news.com

<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source

<><><><><><><><>


.

User: "John Vogel"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 24 Aug 2003 08:09:20 PM
"Al Green" <agg@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:P1d2b.6392$7G2.5024@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a

"Christian"

would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you think
Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?

Al

Better yet, how does Jesus feel knowing that he is using such language in
regard to ANYONE?
Mat 12:48 But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my
mother? and who are my brethren?
Mat 12:49 And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said,
Behold my mother and my brethren!
Mat 12:50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven,
the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.

User: "Ron B."

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 24 Aug 2003 08:16:01 PM
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:

Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a "Christian"
would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you think
Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?

Al

While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to say that
his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at Mary. And he
doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group. I am
leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this, but it
would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.
.
User: "Zaphenath"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 24 Aug 2003 08:48:36 PM
Ron B. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:


Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a "Christian"
would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you think
Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?

How do you think Jesus feels knowing that you, Al, are the one who
caused the situation that led to his mom being called by such language?

While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to say that
his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at Mary. And he
doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group. I am
leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this, but it
would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.

Ron, Al knows which groups this is cross-posted to, because he is the
originator of these posts.
For the others outside of a.r.c.e-o, there has been an effort *inside*
the Orthodox group to get Al to stop posting this stuff. However, all
other groups are removed, since some of us have respect for our Orthodox
beliefs, and are reticent to carry on an internal disagreement in front
of a bunch of other newsgroups. And, after all, no one can control
anyone else on usenet groups -- especially unmoderated alt.* groups.
Grace and Peace,
- Joseph
--
"One should guard against preaching to young people success
in the customary form as the main aim in life. The most
important motive for work in school and in life is pleasure
in work, pleasure in its result, and the knowledge of the
value of the result to the rest of the community."
-- Albert Einstein
.
User: "Al Green"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 25 Aug 2003 06:28:48 AM
I'll leave out the Baptists in the future. They are, obviously, a lost
cause.
Al
"Zaph'enath" <zaphenath@mirai.cx> wrote in message
news:jIadndTbHoxv99SiRVn-iw@speakeasy.net...

Ron B. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:


Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a

"Christian"

would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you think
Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?


How do you think Jesus feels knowing that you, Al, are the one who
caused the situation that led to his mom being called by such language?


While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to say

that

his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at Mary.

And he

doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group. I

am

leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this, but

it

would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.


Ron, Al knows which groups this is cross-posted to, because he is the
originator of these posts.

For the others outside of a.r.c.e-o, there has been an effort *inside*
the Orthodox group to get Al to stop posting this stuff. However, all
other groups are removed, since some of us have respect for our Orthodox
beliefs, and are reticent to carry on an internal disagreement in front
of a bunch of other newsgroups. And, after all, no one can control
anyone else on usenet groups -- especially unmoderated alt.* groups.

Grace and Peace,

- Joseph

--
"One should guard against preaching to young people success
in the customary form as the main aim in life. The most
important motive for work in school and in life is pleasure
in work, pleasure in its result, and the knowledge of the
value of the result to the rest of the community."
-- Albert Einstein

.
User: "Scout Lady"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 25 Aug 2003 08:01:14 AM
"Al Green" <agg@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:Qpm2b.61$iS2.1@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

I'll leave out the Baptists in the future. They are, obviously, a lost
cause.

Have you ever John 9?



"Zaph'enath" <zaphenath@mirai.cx> wrote in message
news:jIadndTbHoxv99SiRVn-iw@speakeasy.net...

Ron B. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:


Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a

"Christian"

would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you

think

Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?


How do you think Jesus feels knowing that you, Al, are the one who
caused the situation that led to his mom being called by such language?


While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to say

that

his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at Mary.

And he

doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group. I

am

leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this, but

it

would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.


Ron, Al knows which groups this is cross-posted to, because he is the
originator of these posts.

For the others outside of a.r.c.e-o, there has been an effort *inside*
the Orthodox group to get Al to stop posting this stuff. However, all
other groups are removed, since some of us have respect for our Orthodox
beliefs, and are reticent to carry on an internal disagreement in front
of a bunch of other newsgroups. And, after all, no one can control
anyone else on usenet groups -- especially unmoderated alt.* groups.

Grace and Peace,

- Joseph

--
"One should guard against preaching to young people success
in the customary form as the main aim in life. The most
important motive for work in school and in life is pleasure
in work, pleasure in its result, and the knowledge of the
value of the result to the rest of the community."
-- Albert Einstein



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 08/20/03
.


User: "YM1"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 25 Aug 2003 11:18:37 AM
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:48:36 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:

Ron B. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:


Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a "Christian"
would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you think
Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?


How do you think Jesus feels knowing that you, Al, are the one who
caused the situation that led to his mom being called by such language?


While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to say that
his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at Mary. And he
doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group. I am
leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this, but it
would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.


Ron, Al knows which groups this is cross-posted to, because he is the
originator of these posts.

For the others outside of a.r.c.e-o, there has been an effort *inside*
the Orthodox group to get Al to stop posting this stuff. However, all
other groups are removed, since some of us have respect for our Orthodox
beliefs, and are reticent to carry on an internal disagreement in front
of a bunch of other newsgroups. And, after all, no one can control
anyone else on usenet groups -- especially unmoderated alt.* groups.

Grace and Peace,

- Joseph

YM1
I must have missed the rules of what we can be and post on here. I
thought this was a Christian group that atheist come to--to insult us.
I like to call myself a Christian instead of a denomination. Do you
want me to quit posting here?
.
User: "YM1"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 26 Aug 2003 12:33:21 PM
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:39:07 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:

YM1 wrote:

On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:48:36 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:


Ron B. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:



Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a "Christian"
would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you think
Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?


How do you think Jesus feels knowing that you, Al, are the one who
caused the situation that led to his mom being called by such language?



While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to say that
his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at Mary. And he
doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group. I am
leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this, but it
would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.


Ron, Al knows which groups this is cross-posted to, because he is the
originator of these posts.

For the others outside of a.r.c.e-o, there has been an effort *inside*
the Orthodox group to get Al to stop posting this stuff. However, all
other groups are removed, since some of us have respect for our Orthodox
beliefs, and are reticent to carry on an internal disagreement in front
of a bunch of other newsgroups. And, after all, no one can control
anyone else on usenet groups -- especially unmoderated alt.* groups.

Grace and Peace,

- Joseph



YM1

I must have missed the rules of what we can be and post on here. I
thought this was a Christian group that atheist come to--to insult us.


What in the heck are you talking about? Do you even realize that this
thread is x-posted to FIVE newsgroups. I didn't suggest anything about
what you should or shouldn't post, "YM1". I was referring to Al Green's
practice of posting Orthodox material that he knows will be offensive to
Fundamentalists and Evangelical Protestants. In messages in
alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox (which were NOT x-posted) a number
of us have been trying to get Mr. Green to stop this practice -- which
shows disrespect for our Orthodox faith as much as it does for the
sensitivities of the Protestant groups.


I like to call myself a Christian instead of a denomination. Do you
want me to quit posting here?


Again, what are you talking about?? I don't care if you post in any of
the five groups in which you are currently posting. And you can call
yourself anything you want. You are a Protestant, though, right?. If
you want to be really vague and just call yourself a "Christian," that's
your business. It doesn't do anything to change the fact that you do
indeed belong to a particular sect, of course -- but like I said, I
don't care what you call yourself.

- Joseph

YM1
I guess I'm a little touchy but I catch lots of flack because I'm not
denominational. I do belong to the Baptist church but only to have a
church to identify with. I believe denominations do more harm than
they do good. The argument about which denomination is right does
nothing but separate brothers in Christ Jesus.
.
User: "digimortal"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 26 Aug 2003 05:50:14 PM
We Orthodox are not part of a denomination either ;-)
"YM1" <YM1@juno.com> wrote in message
news:u56nkvodvit6rss542aolir4r5hsdhfout@4ax.com...

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:39:07 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:

YM1 wrote:

On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:48:36 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:


Ron B. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:



Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a

"Christian"

would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you

think

Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?


How do you think Jesus feels knowing that you, Al, are the one who
caused the situation that led to his mom being called by such language?



While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to say

that

his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at Mary.

And he

doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group. I

am

leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this, but

it

would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.


Ron, Al knows which groups this is cross-posted to, because he is the
originator of these posts.

For the others outside of a.r.c.e-o, there has been an effort *inside*
the Orthodox group to get Al to stop posting this stuff. However, all
other groups are removed, since some of us have respect for our

Orthodox

beliefs, and are reticent to carry on an internal disagreement in front
of a bunch of other newsgroups. And, after all, no one can control
anyone else on usenet groups -- especially unmoderated alt.* groups.

Grace and Peace,

- Joseph



YM1

I must have missed the rules of what we can be and post on here. I
thought this was a Christian group that atheist come to--to insult us.


What in the heck are you talking about? Do you even realize that this
thread is x-posted to FIVE newsgroups. I didn't suggest anything about
what you should or shouldn't post, "YM1". I was referring to Al Green's
practice of posting Orthodox material that he knows will be offensive to
Fundamentalists and Evangelical Protestants. In messages in
alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox (which were NOT x-posted) a number
of us have been trying to get Mr. Green to stop this practice -- which
shows disrespect for our Orthodox faith as much as it does for the
sensitivities of the Protestant groups.


I like to call myself a Christian instead of a denomination. Do you
want me to quit posting here?


Again, what are you talking about?? I don't care if you post in any of
the five groups in which you are currently posting. And you can call
yourself anything you want. You are a Protestant, though, right?. If
you want to be really vague and just call yourself a "Christian," that's
your business. It doesn't do anything to change the fact that you do
indeed belong to a particular sect, of course -- but like I said, I
don't care what you call yourself.

- Joseph


YM1
I guess I'm a little touchy but I catch lots of flack because I'm not
denominational. I do belong to the Baptist church but only to have a
church to identify with. I believe denominations do more harm than
they do good. The argument about which denomination is right does
nothing but separate brothers in Christ Jesus.

.
User: "YM1"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 27 Aug 2003 10:35:06 AM
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:50:14 -0400, "digimortal"
<digimortal@starpower.net> wrote:

We Orthodox are not part of a denomination either ;-)

YM1
Then perhaps you could tell me what your beliefs are. I had supposed
you were part of the Catholic Church.


"YM1" <YM1@juno.com> wrote in message
news:u56nkvodvit6rss542aolir4r5hsdhfout@4ax.com...

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:39:07 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:

YM1 wrote:

On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:48:36 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:


Ron B. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:



Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a

"Christian"

would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you

think

Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?


How do you think Jesus feels knowing that you, Al, are the one who
caused the situation that led to his mom being called by such language?



While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to say

that

his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at Mary.

And he

doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group. I

am

leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this, but

it

would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.


Ron, Al knows which groups this is cross-posted to, because he is the
originator of these posts.

For the others outside of a.r.c.e-o, there has been an effort *inside*
the Orthodox group to get Al to stop posting this stuff. However, all
other groups are removed, since some of us have respect for our

Orthodox

beliefs, and are reticent to carry on an internal disagreement in front
of a bunch of other newsgroups. And, after all, no one can control
anyone else on usenet groups -- especially unmoderated alt.* groups.

Grace and Peace,

- Joseph



YM1

I must have missed the rules of what we can be and post on here. I
thought this was a Christian group that atheist come to--to insult us.


What in the heck are you talking about? Do you even realize that this
thread is x-posted to FIVE newsgroups. I didn't suggest anything about
what you should or shouldn't post, "YM1". I was referring to Al Green's
practice of posting Orthodox material that he knows will be offensive to
Fundamentalists and Evangelical Protestants. In messages in
alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox (which were NOT x-posted) a number
of us have been trying to get Mr. Green to stop this practice -- which
shows disrespect for our Orthodox faith as much as it does for the
sensitivities of the Protestant groups.


I like to call myself a Christian instead of a denomination. Do you
want me to quit posting here?


Again, what are you talking about?? I don't care if you post in any of
the five groups in which you are currently posting. And you can call
yourself anything you want. You are a Protestant, though, right?. If
you want to be really vague and just call yourself a "Christian," that's
your business. It doesn't do anything to change the fact that you do
indeed belong to a particular sect, of course -- but like I said, I
don't care what you call yourself.

- Joseph


YM1
I guess I'm a little touchy but I catch lots of flack because I'm not
denominational. I do belong to the Baptist church but only to have a
church to identify with. I believe denominations do more harm than
they do good. The argument about which denomination is right does
nothing but separate brothers in Christ Jesus.


.
User: "digimortal"

Title: Re: An Orthodox View of the Virgin Mary 28 Aug 2003 03:06:48 AM
Catholic means "universal". If you mean ROMAN catholic, no we are not...
"YM1" <YM1@juno.com> wrote in message
news:6qjpkv8ls7vadvrhjuuob6j8v91aqj8097@4ax.com...

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:50:14 -0400, "digimortal"
<digimortal@starpower.net> wrote:

We Orthodox are not part of a denomination either ;-)


YM1
Then perhaps you could tell me what your beliefs are. I had supposed
you were part of the Catholic Church.


"YM1" <YM1@juno.com> wrote in message
news:u56nkvodvit6rss542aolir4r5hsdhfout@4ax.com...

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:39:07 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:

YM1 wrote:

On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 18:48:36 -0700, Zaph'enath <zaphenath@mirai.cx>
wrote:


Ron B. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:48:47 +0000, Al Green wrote:



Sorry John. I misread you. I thought you were an adult who, as a

"Christian"

would avoid such terms as calling the Virgin Mary s--t. How do you

think

Jesus feels knowing that you call his mom by such language?


How do you think Jesus feels knowing that you, Al, are the one who
caused the situation that led to his mom being called by such

language?




While John and I have major differences of opinion, I do have to

say

that

his strong language was aimed at the _posting_ itself and not at

Mary.

And he

doe's have a point. We have x-posted this thing to a Baptist group.

I

am

leaving in the Baptist group so that John can know I've said this,

but

it

would be prudent to check our NG list in the future.


Ron, Al knows which groups this is cross-posted to, because he is

the

originator of these posts.

For the others outside of a.r.c.e-o, there has been an effort

*inside*

the Orthodox group to get Al to stop posting this stuff. However,

all

other groups are removed, since some of us have respect for our

Orthodox

beliefs, and are reticent to carry on an internal disagreement in

front

of a bunch of other newsgroups. And, after all, no one can control
anyone else on usenet groups -- especially unmoderated alt.* groups.

Grace and Peace,

- Joseph



YM1

I must have missed the rules of what we can be and post on here. I
thought this was a Christian group that atheist come to--to insult

us.


What in the heck are you talking about? Do you even realize that this
thread is x-posted to FIVE newsgroups. I didn't suggest anything

about

what you should or shouldn't post, "YM1". I was referring to Al

Green's

practice of posting Orthodox material that he knows will be offensive

to

Fundamentalists and Evangelical Protestants. In messages in
alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox (which were NOT x-posted) a

number

of us have been trying to get Mr. Green to stop this practice -- which
shows disrespect for our Orthodox faith as much as it does for the
sensitivities of the Protestant groups.


I like to call myself a Christian instead of a denomination. Do you
want me to quit posting here?


Again, what are you talking about?? I don't care if you post in any

of

the five groups in which you are currently posting. And you can call
yourself anything you want. You are a Protestant, though, right?. If
you want to be really vague and just call yourself a "Christian,"

that's

your business. It doesn't do anything to change the fact that you do
indeed belong to a particular sect, of course -- but like I said, I
don't care what you call yourself.

- Joseph


YM1
I guess I'm a little touchy but I catch lots of flack because I'm not
denominational. I do belong to the Baptist church but only to have a
church to identify with. I believe denominations do more harm than
they do good. The argument about which denomination is right does
nothing but separate brothers in Christ Jesus.



.








  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER