| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!" |
| Date: |
20 Nov 2004 09:47:41 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Anti-choice question |
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:35:12 GMT,
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
--
Pro-choice bumper stickers: www.cafepress.com/saproducts/228365
Bush or chimp? See the similarities!: www.bushorchimp.com/pics.html
Gay-friendly items: www.cafepress.com/saproducts/228315
Dogs hate $hrub, too: www.dogshatebush.com
US troops killed in Iraq (thanks, George!):
www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
21 Nov 2004 10:09:54 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message news:<41bb0e6e.107139830@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:35:12 GMT,
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
--
Pro-choice bumper stickers: www.cafepress.com/saproducts/228365
Bush or chimp? See the similarities!: www.bushorchimp.com/pics.html
Gay-friendly items: www.cafepress.com/saproducts/228315
Dogs hate $hrub, too: www.dogshatebush.com
US troops killed in Iraq (thanks, George!):
www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties
-- Craig Chilton < >
Craig,
I have numerous times posted in this newsgroup my willingness to
see that any children you pro-abortion police state people would let
live are cared for if you will bring them to my welding shop.
So far there has been no response. What happened?
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
22 Nov 2004 05:40:00 PM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411212009.1a2ee5dc@posting.google.com...
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want to have
careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want without taking
responsibility for their own CHOICES?
I don't want to take care of you either, if you become disabled, because of
drunk driving or some other careless activity that you may engage in, should
we just murder you too?
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411212009.1a2ee5dc@posting.google.com...
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries.
Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message
news:<41bb0e6e.107139830@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:35:12 GMT,
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
--
Pro-choice bumper stickers: www.cafepress.com/saproducts/228365
Bush or chimp? See the similarities!: www.bushorchimp.com/pics.html
Gay-friendly items: www.cafepress.com/saproducts/228315
Dogs hate $hrub, too: www.dogshatebush.com
US troops killed in Iraq (thanks, George!):
www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
Craig,
I have numerous times posted in this newsgroup my willingness to
see that any children you pro-abortion police state people would let
live are cared for if you will bring them to my welding shop.
So far there has been no response. What happened?
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
22 Nov 2004 05:53:31 PM |
|
|
Dore wrote:
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411212009.1a2ee5dc@posting.google.com...
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want to have
careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want without taking
responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Because you don't want to allow us to take responsibility for our
choices, that's the point.
I don't want to take care of you either, if you become disabled, because of
drunk driving or some other careless activity that you may engage in, should
we just murder you too?
So just how long do you consider that someone brain-dead should sit on
life support? Just curious.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
23 Nov 2004 08:06:19 PM |
|
|
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:30fcfvF2v8gdsU1@uni-berlin.de...
Because you don't want to allow us to take responsibility for our
choices, that's the point.
Do you just MURDER anyone or anything that gets in your way? You don't take
responsibility for your choices that is why you have an unwanted pregnancy
and murder your own children.
cont
So just how long do you consider that someone brain-dead should sit on
life support? Just curious.
I don't think that someone should be on life support in the first place.
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:30fcfvF2v8gdsU1@uni-berlin.de...
Dore wrote:
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411212009.1a2ee5dc@posting.google.com...
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want to have
careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want without taking
responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Because you don't want to allow us to take responsibility for our
choices, that's the point.
I don't want to take care of you either, if you become disabled, because
of
drunk driving or some other careless activity that you may engage in,
should
we just murder you too?
So just how long do you consider that someone brain-dead should sit on
life support? Just curious.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
24 Nov 2004 10:17:15 PM |
|
|
Dore <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
"--sexkitten--" <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Because you don't want to allow us to take responsibility for our
choices, that's the point.
Do you just MURDER anyone or anything that gets in your way?
Nope. Do you?
You don't take
responsibility for your choices that is why you have an unwanted pregnancy
and murder your own children.
And so the anti-sex control freak spews hatre dat those who don't bow
down to her insane dictates.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
22 Nov 2004 07:10:31 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:40:00 GMT,
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want
to have careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want without
taking responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Actually, by NOT adopting children into bigoted hoseholds like
yours, you are doing those kids a ***huge*** FAVOR!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dore" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
23 Nov 2004 08:07:18 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41a98c84.88078379@netnews.mchsi.com...
Actually, by NOT adopting children into bigoted hoseholds like
yours, you are doing those kids a ***huge*** FAVOR!!
At least they would be better off with me than you, for you would just KILL
them if they got in the way of your life.
--
Dore
www.dorewilliamson.com
"Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41a98c84.88078379@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:40:00 GMT,
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want
to have careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want without
taking responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Actually, by NOT adopting children into bigoted hoseholds like
yours, you are doing those kids a ***huge*** FAVOR!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
23 Nov 2004 10:51:59 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:07:18 GMT,
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want
to have careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want without
taking responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Actually, by NOT adopting children into bigoted hoseholds like
yours, you are doing those kids a ***huge*** FAVOR!!
At least they would be better off with me than you, for you would
just KILL them if they got in the way of your life.
One thing about you, Dore -- you are such a certifiable LIAR as
to have ZILCH credibility in here. If THIS post weren't enough to
guarantee that, there are always those moronic ones you put up in
the past where you claimed to have been to heaven, etc.
What a loon! If you're not posting from a cacke factory
somewhere, I'm amazed!!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Evanard Hughes" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
24 Nov 2004 05:53:03 AM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message news:<41ad1247.187873023@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:07:18 GMT,
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want
to have careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want without
taking responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Actually, by NOT adopting children into bigoted hoseholds like
yours, you are doing those kids a ***huge*** FAVOR!!
At least they would be better off with me than you, for you would
just KILL them if they got in the way of your life.
One thing about you, Dore -- you are such a certifiable LIAR as
to have ZILCH credibility in here. If THIS post weren't enough to
guarantee that, there are always those moronic ones you put up in
the past where you claimed to have been to heaven, etc.
What a loon! If you're not posting from a cacke factory
somewhere, I'm amazed!!
Hit a nerve, did he?
Evanard Hughes
http://www.geocities.com/evanardhughes
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
24 Nov 2004 06:12:53 AM |
|
|
On 24 Nov 2004 03:53:03 -0800,
Evanard Hughes <evanardhughes@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who
want to have careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they
want without taking responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Actually, by NOT adopting children into bigoted hoseholds like
yours, you are doing those kids a ***huge*** FAVOR!!
At least they would be better off with me than you, for you would
just KILL them if they got in the way of your life.
One thing about you, Dore -- you are such a certifiable LIAR as
to have ZILCH credibility in here. If THIS post weren't enough to
guarantee that, there are always those moronic ones you put up in
the past where you claimed to have been to heaven, etc.
What a loon! If you're not posting from a cackle factory
somewhere, I'm amazed!!
Hit a nerve, did he?
Not in the least. That's impossible for any bigot to do. But it
often amazes me just HOW profoundly stupid they can be. As Dore
just was.
And, BTW, I believe that Dore is a "she."
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Evanard Hughes" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
26 Nov 2004 02:51:55 AM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message news:<41a8799f.214332568@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 24 Nov 2004 03:53:03 -0800,
Evanard Hughes <evanardhughes@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who
want to have careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they
want without taking responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Actually, by NOT adopting children into bigoted hoseholds like
yours, you are doing those kids a ***huge*** FAVOR!!
At least they would be better off with me than you, for you would
just KILL them if they got in the way of your life.
One thing about you, Dore -- you are such a certifiable LIAR as
to have ZILCH credibility in here. If THIS post weren't enough to
guarantee that, there are always those moronic ones you put up in
the past where you claimed to have been to heaven, etc.
What a loon! If you're not posting from a cackle factory
somewhere, I'm amazed!!
Hit a nerve, did he?
Not in the least. That's impossible for any bigot to do. But it
often amazes me just HOW profoundly stupid they can be. As Dore
just was.
And, BTW, I believe that Dore is a "she."
To me it is obvious that "she" hit a nerve.
She could have been a blanket in sunset and you could still allow
your nerve to be hit.
Amd you did.
Evanard Hughes
http://www.geocities.com/evanardhughes
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Give thanks for the Freedoms we will NEVER allow to be denied!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
26 Nov 2004 04:13:15 AM |
|
|
On 26 Nov 2004 00:51:55 -0800,
Bigoted Troll, Evanard Hughes <evanardhughes@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Evanard Hughes <evanardhughes@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who
want to have careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they
want without taking responsibility for their own CHOICES?
Actually, by NOT adopting children into bigoted hoseholds like
yours, you are doing those kids a ***huge*** FAVOR!!
At least they would be better off with me than you, for you would
just KILL them if they got in the way of your life.
One thing about you, Dore -- you are such a certifiable LIAR as
to have ZILCH credibility in here. If THIS post weren't enough to
guarantee that, there are always those moronic ones you put up in
the past where you claimed to have been to heaven, etc.
What a loon! If you're not posting from a cackle factory
somewhere, I'm amazed!!
Hit a nerve, did he?
Not in the least. That's impossible for any bigot to do. But it
often amazes me just HOW profoundly stupid they can be. As Dore
just was.
And, BTW, I believe that Dore is a "she."
To me it is obvious that "she" hit a nerve.
Fine. Keep kidding yourself, troll. You do it all the time.
For you, being delusional is quite normal. In one of your more
recent posts, you proved that in spades!
(I wonder whose sockpuppet this guy is. Anyone know?)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Some-Writer" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
23 Nov 2004 08:17:25 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:40:00 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411212009.1a2ee5dc@posting.google.com...
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want to have
careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want...
Woo hooo. Lustful sex and fornication -- yes! What a way to enjoy
_that_ aspect of marriage. <drools>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
23 Nov 2004 09:58:23 PM |
|
|
Some-Writer <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:40:00 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411212009.1a2ee5dc@posting.google.com...
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want to have
careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want...
Woo hooo. Lustful sex and fornication -- yes! What a way to enjoy
_that_ aspect of marriage. <drools>
Been there, done that. (And we're still doing it. :-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Some-Writer" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
25 Nov 2004 11:01:49 AM |
|
|
On 23 Nov 2004 21:58:23 -0600, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Some-Writer <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:40:00 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411212009.1a2ee5dc@posting.google.com...
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want to have
careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want...
Woo hooo. Lustful sex and fornication -- yes! What a way to enjoy
_that_ aspect of marriage. <drools>
Been there, done that. (And we're still doing it. :-
Enjoyyyyyyyyyyy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick Lee Humphrey" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
26 Nov 2004 12:32:07 AM |
|
|
Some-Writer <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On 23 Nov 2004 21:58:23 -0600, Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com>
wrote:
Some-Writer <sappywriter@poetic.com> writes:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:40:00 GMT, "Dore" <dorewilliamson@verizon.net>
wrote:
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote in message
news:a17e5e0e.0411212009.1a2ee5dc@posting.google.com...
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
Why should we take care of the consequences of those who want to have
careless lustful sex and fornicate as much as they want...
Woo hooo. Lustful sex and fornication -- yes! What a way to enjoy
_that_ aspect of marriage. <drools>
Been there, done that. (And we're still doing it. :-
Enjoyyyyyyyyyyy.
We will, after recovering from this holiday, which was devoted to reducing the
turkey population. ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher Benson-Manica" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
23 Nov 2004 08:12:52 AM |
|
|
In talk.abortion Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
I have numerous times posted in this newsgroup my willingness to
see that any children you pro-abortion police state people would let
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
How is a pro-choice state a police state? Allowing legal abortions
actually reduces the load on the state's security forces.
--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
22 Nov 2004 01:24:48 AM |
|
|
On 21 Nov 2004 20:09:54 -0800,
rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) ...
...did NOTHING but prove once again that he is a
mindless TROLL, and not worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
22 Nov 2004 04:07:33 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message news:<41b69401.24449564@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 21 Nov 2004 20:09:54 -0800,
rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) ...
...did NOTHING but prove once again that he is a
mindless TROLL, and not worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton < >
Craig,
Thank you for sharing your ideas. Remember, any time you want to
let a child live, just bring it by.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
22 Nov 2004 06:52:00 PM |
|
|
On 22 Nov 2004 14:07:33 -0800,
On 21 Nov 2004 20:09:54 -0800,
rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) ...
...did NOTHING but prove once again that he is a
mindless TROLL, and not worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
24 Nov 2004 11:17:10 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message news:<41a88995.87327464@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 22 Nov 2004 14:07:33 -0800,
On 21 Nov 2004 20:09:54 -0800,
rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) ...
...did NOTHING but prove once again that he is a
mindless TROLL, and not worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton < >
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Thank you for sharing your ideas, Criag.
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Give thanks for the Freedoms we will NEVER allow to be denied!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
24 Nov 2004 11:36:11 PM |
|
|
On 24 Nov 2004 21:17:10 -0800,
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com>...
...did NOTHING but prove once again that he is a
mindless TROLL, and not worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Thank you for sharing your ideas, Craig.
I'm ALWAYS only too happy to point out the TRUTH.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
27 Nov 2004 08:30:23 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton -- Give thanks for the Freedoms we will NEVER allow to be denied!) wrote in message news:<41a96eb1.2538727@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 24 Nov 2004 21:17:10 -0800,
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com>...
...did NOTHING but prove once again that he is a
mindless TROLL, and not worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton < >
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Thank you for sharing your ideas, Craig.
I'm ALWAYS only too happy to point out the TRUTH.
-- Craig Chilton < >
The Declaration of Independence is the law of the land here in the
United States. You need to take your pro-abortion police state
propaganda back to Europe where it came from.
Robert b. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Give thanks for the Freedoms we will NEVER allow to be denied!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
27 Nov 2004 10:11:24 PM |
|
|
On 27 Nov 2004 18:30:23 -0800,
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn3@juno.com>...
...did NOTHING but prove once again that he is a
mindless TROLL, and not worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Thank you for sharing your ideas, Craig.
I'm ALWAYS only too happy to point out the TRUTH.
The Declaration of Independence is the law of the land here in the
United States.
No it isn't . AT ALL. Not in the LEAST. It has absolutely NO
force of law whatsoever. You are one of the most uneducated
dunces I've ever seen posting in Usenet.
You need to take your [Pro-Choice] police state
[facts] back to Europe where it came from.
You truly ARE dumber than a dead rock. Two thirds of Americans
are Pro-Choice. Abortion is nothing but an anormously beneficial and
totally harmless REMEDY. And if it **weren't** fully legal here, THEN
we would be living in a police state.
Did you take lessons to become as incredibly stupid as you keep
PROVING that you are, troll?
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
22 Nov 2004 06:11:57 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message news:<41b69401.24449564@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On 21 Nov 2004 20:09:54 -0800,
rbwinn3@juno.com (Robert B. Winn) ...
...did NOTHING but prove once again that he is a
mindless TROLL, and not worth wasting time on.
-- Craig Chilton < >
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Any person intolerant of trolls or dwarfs is a bigot.
Robert B. winn
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Victoria Hirt" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
23 Nov 2004 06:03:25 AM |
|
|
On 21 Nov 2004 20:09:54 -0800, (Robert B. Winn)
wrote:
Craig,
I have numerous times posted in this newsgroup my willingness to
see that any children you pro-abortion police state people would let
live are cared for if you will bring them to my welding shop.
So far there has been no response. What happened?
Robert B. winn
I think your offer is wonderful! How do you let people know about
your offer? Do you have a Web site with the information? Do you run
ads in your local media? Maybe this is something that could be
started elsewhere. I bet your local paper has done several stories on
you and your willingness to see that these children are cared for.
Please give us more information.
The only freedom tyranny offers is the freedom to submit.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "awthrawthr" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
21 Nov 2004 10:34:22 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!) wrote in message news:<41bb0e6e.107139830@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:35:12 GMT,
LinuxSaves wrote:
Just curious as to how many of the anti-choice crowd would
ADOPT the unwanted babies born if abortion were outlawed.
Not only that, but why haven't you ALREADY adopted the tens
of thousands of kids currently languishing in the foster care
system or in orphanages?
That's **** 130,000 *** at last count, Anti-Choice hypocrites!
You know, the ones who are physically disabled, mentally-
challenged, have AIDS or HIV, are biracial or otherwise non-white,
older kids, sexually or physically abused, etc. I'm truly interested
in hearing what you HYPOCRITES have to say!
There is NO valid reason to oppose the valuable remedy of
abortion. Anti-Choicers are all about mindless and ignorant
hatefulness toward women. So lots of luck getting an honest
answer to your question from any of those sociopathic losers.
Hey, chilly baby, how'd the presidential election go in Iowa -- that
state that didn't care about abortion? Do you recall that I said in a
close election, Kerry's support for partial birth abortion would cost
him bigtime? It seems Iowa was one of those states.
Face it, we prolifers are outbreeding you guys. That's what happens
when you kill 25% of the future population and most of the killing is
done by abortion supporters.
What does it all mean? It means your demented signature line will be
finding fewer and fewer readers who might think is the least bit
interesting.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Society OUTGROWS petty bigotries. Egalitarians assist it!" |
|
| Title: Re: Anti-choice question |
22 Nov 2004 01:27:00 AM |
|
|
On 21 Nov 2004 20:34:22 -0800,
"Awthrawthr" <awthrawthr@yahoo.com> wrote:
...spewed abject stupidity that I just answered quite
adequately in another response post to that bigoted loser.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
