Reply to note from (Andrew) 27 Aug 2003 03:42:22
-0700
John W <john_w@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<pddhkv0q0e3f3q9s5uc7huiir5eck2miro@4ax.com>...
On 21 Aug 2003 21:30:50 GMT, Andrew Hodgson <
>
wrote:
John W <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:ofhnjvo0do90ab864a9a6l6qu8keijv3ku@4ax.com:
On 12 Aug 2003 09:33:27 -0700,
(Andrew) wrote:
etc.
On 11 Aug 2003 00:06:28 GMT, Andrew Hodgson <
>
wrote:
"Anne Marie" <annmarie-no-spam@cotse.net> wrote in
news:YW5ubWFyaWU=.749e0adb9db28ff70315ec312500b2fe@1060524369.cots
e.net
Andrew> > >If you have comprehension issues you should try to take
time to read > > >posts carefully so you can take in all the
arguments raised. When I see a > > >reply halfway down my post, with
all points that I brought up totally > > >ignored, it gives the
strong impression that you either did not have an > > >answer for
those points, or did not read them in the first place. You > > >seem
to want to rush into replying without considering that patience > >
would enable you to give a much more cohesive post, rather than one
that > > >looks like a knee-jerk reaction.
jezebeth aka jw> > >> And at this point, since yuou continue to
question both my honest and > > >> my sanity, this concludes our
business.
Don't think I've ever questioned your sanity.
I will try to remember to not repond to you further. You aren't
worthy.
snip
jezebeth > > Too late. I will not trust your dots any more than you
trusted that > > the church was there, so you only bothered to go to
one base, then > > didn't photograph the buildings to prove the church
was NOT there. > >
And I don't respond to ALL your questions because I consider them/you
unworthy of my time. YOu found MY claim unworthy of YOUR time; I
merely return your distrust and discourtesy.
Once again you completely ignore the points made and resort to
unfounded assertions. You repeatedly demonstrate that you cannot
think in a rational manner. When confronted by people who disagree
with you, your first reaction is to lash out. Don't you realise that a
far more effective response would be to back up your claims (thus
embarrassing all those doubters)?
snip
-There is no 525AD Baptist Church outside the gatehouse of Alconbury
or Lakenheath. The both are backed up by photographic evidence, and an
email received by Daniel S Viera directly from the authorities at
Lakenheath (http://tinyurl.com/lbzw) seems to rule that base out as a
possible location for your church entirely.
snip good data & research, but bandwidths expensive & places other
than the USA
Andrew, a word of thanks for your time & trouble. A job well done from
what I can see, & it just might put this particular falsehood to rest.
walksalone who does enjoy good research, espially when it teaches him
something new
.
