GlennGlenn <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote in message news:<310320041427436202%dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com>...
In article <bbba7302.0403310731.4a170189@posting.google.com>,
Not-easily-duped <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote:
GlennGlenn <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote in message
news:<300320040827077516%dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com>...
In article <bbba7302.0403281527.4d5a60fb@posting.google.com>,
Not-easily-duped <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote:
I have analyzed the Bible
Define "analyzed."
Let us go by your own definition
*You* are the one who is laying claim to have done this, so *you*
should be able to explain what you did that amounts to analysis.
Let us go by your definition, will we? simple as that.
Indeed, some might say that you are obligated to, under the
circumstances, in order to continue a fruitful discussion of what your
alleged analysis has wrought.
Of course fruitful discussion is likely as far from your mind as can be.
So... never mind.
.