Dear Israel,
I note from your other discussion threads, that you have a substantial
technical background in computing architectures related to business models
etc.
My view is that the not only does the mathematical/chronological (22
taxonomoy / 7 days) vMeme/Moment Kabbalistic Homoiotic Model provide a
rational basis for understanding language, but is the heuristic basis for
its philosophical understanding in that the sequencing which I provided
below might not only be considered the start sequence, with the {Aleph to
Zayin} providing the heads of law as a double encoding--I demonstrate the
various forms of language eg: Hebrew usual, Hebrew final, Hebrew Kinetic.
However with the English being principally a 7 x 3 subset + 5 x vowels,
there appears to be an unique interpretation which can be appled to each of
the planes. That is what I call: English Usual, English Kinetic, Agree
Usual, Agree Kinetic.
Thus it might be considered the neural linguistic basis for interpreting
language. Also it provides a trans-personal and purely intellectual object
as noumenon as the means for which inductive and deductive reasoning might
be considered to take place. That is the foundation on which Expert Systems
may be deployed. Its been many years since I've utilised a product such as
Guru from Micro Data Base Systems. But I mention that product because it was
capable of providing an extra-ordinary level of rules based forward/backward
chaining, fuzzy variables and a unified theory of knowledge representation
within an incredibly small memory footprint (ie. intially it ran within
640Kb). However the present day 40K US price tag for the software licence
is presently outside my priority.
Its my view and hope, as demonstrated by the Grapple calendar, that
manufactures Microsoft and Apple will see the extra-ordinary benefits in
incorporating within their WWW-browsers this primary level of expert system
functionality established on the vMeme/Moment Kabbalistic Paradigm--it will
no doubt provide a quantum potential and as the basis for calendaring and
decision making models, provide what might truly be considered Portable
Digital Assistants, Diaries with reasoning capabilities, intelligent
gateways / routers etc...
In summary therefore as the Kabbalistic paradigm it provides a unified
approach to number theory, words and phenomenon occuring in time and
consequently it ought to be beneficial in providing a framework for
supporting Bayesian Theory, which according to Jose Bernardo & Adrian Smith
treatise [ISBN 0-471-92416-4] provides a rationalistic theory of
personalistics and beliefs in contexts of uncertainty, with the central aim
of characterising how an individual should act in order to achieve certain
kinds of desirable behavioural outcome. The theory establishes that expected
utility maximisation as axiomatic or intuitive approaches to quantifying
uncertainty, assisted by the usage of a homoiotic noumenon, provides the
basis for rational decision making.
The vMeme/Moment Mathematical/Chronological Kabbalistic paradigm, may
therefore be defined as a virtual universe or lens by which events are
viewed as occurring within a definite time space. Where the probability P of
some event E (denoted P(E)) is defined with respect to a "universe" {ie. an
implied chronological universe: Telos (122J3W1D as 6,000) = Arch (0) + c² or
the universe of discourse} in the case where the sample space is finite or
countably infinite, a probability function can also be defined by its values
on the elementary events {e1}, {e2}, ... where S = {e1, e2, ...} as a sample
space S of all possible elementary events {ie. hemi-sphere sampled
chronological universe of action: 3(3²+1)/2 (15 days) ... 9(9²+1/2 = (369
days)} in such a way that P must satisfy any probability axioms as rules of
coherence and quantification (viz. Jose Bernardo & Adrian Smith), any
implied epistemological hermeneutic usage given by language and number as
the Kabbalistic empirical-inductive and meta-physical deductive paradigm, in
addition to the Kolmogorov probability axioms:
AXIOM #1 : 0 <= P(E) <= 1
AXIOM #2 : P(S) = 1
AXIOM #3 : SUM P(Ei) = P(E1 U E2 U...)
I have an assumption that as a chronological linear expression: Telos
(122J3W1D as 6,000) = Arch (0) + c² with its breakdown as follows:
1. Begin/Arch/Genesis ... 22/7 = 3W1D [#13, #12, #29, #69 - Profound Use/
The Function of the Mysterious (#3, #79)]
2. Cata {-strophe} ... 26J5W [#79, #26, #30, #9 - The Inconstancy of
Achievement/ Practising Placidity (#13, #69)]
3. Generation ... 40J4W [#80, #53, #72, #32 - A Natural Guide/ The Virtue of
Holiness (#24, #58)]
4. Torah Law & Jubilee @ Sinai [50J] - 1550 BCE ... [#38, #38, #40, #20 -
Left without Language/ Different From the Vulgar (#31, #51)]
5. Artaxerxes' decree as Hebrew's return from Babylonian Exile & Pythagorean
use of YHWH Tetragrammation [72J] + 3(3²+1)/2=[2W1D]} #3 = 457 BCE ... #10 =
33 CE [#9, #31, #51, #61 - Virtuosity at Using 'Beneath'/ The Virtue of
Humility (#59, #23)]
6. Jesus of Nazareth in midst 69th Week = 30 CE as [10J] = 490 years - 33 CE
.... [#3, #20, #52, #73 - Employing Deeming/ Daring to Act (#69, #13)]
7. Telos [122J3W1D] - 6,000 years + {9(9²+1)/2=[52W5D]} ... [#71, #80, #45,
#35 - Great Guiding Signs?/ The Virtue of Benevolence (#81, #1)]
Might be considered a dynamic ratio as the model applies equally to:
a) past (Genesis (22/7 = 3W1D) to Telos (6000 years = 122J3W1D)),
b) present (the day as 5 minute alotments: 1st min = Nature contains Nature;
2nd min = Nature rejoices in its Nature; 3rd min = Nature surmounts Nature;
4th min = Nature amended in its Nature; to 5th min = Act of nature) and
c) future (the year).
And therefore it might be possible to pour any time based event such as a
movie or music and deploy it as a dynamic ratio to examine the plot or that
the sequencing follows the appropriate course as conveyed by the
noumenon--My view is that the closer an time sequence is to having fidelity
to the noumenon, the more sublime it is. However I am not in a posititon to
explore this.
I do not imagine a field of human endeavour which cannot be enriched by it.
Since you have shown a technological capability and were polite, I'd pass
those thoughts of mine on.
- dolf
"Qolon" <telos@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:BLJzd.89358$K7.44681@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
If you are familar with the 72 Angels as divine name by extension obtained
from an anagrammation of [Exodus 14:19-21], then you will readily observe
that I have equated this to the four traditional understanding of the
Kabbalistic planes by assigning this to one of four mathematical planes.
That is the arrangement of the Hebrew letters as stoicheion (ie. taxonomy)
and microcosm of 2 (3 x 3) magic squares with centres on the Yom and Mem,
finds correspodence in the #369 Matix as vMeme/Moment Kabbalistic noumenon
and macrocosm.
That is :
Cheth [Aleph] [Beth] [Gimel] [Daleth] [He] [Vav] [Zayin]
[Teth] [Yod] [Kaf] [Lamed] [Mem][Nun] [Samek]
[Ayin] [Pe] [Tsade] [Qoph] [Resh] [Shin] [Tau]
I present there the superficial plane as the co-joining of the 4 x #369
planes plus their natural and reverse sequence. It demonstrates the Daemon
/ Angel correspondence as the influencer of autonomous behaviour for the
past (Genesis (22/7 = 3W1D) to Telos (6000 years = 122J3W1D)), present (the
day as 5 minute alotments: 1st min = Nature contains Nature; 2nd min =
Nature
rejoices in its Nature; 3rd min = Nature surmounts Nature; 4th min = Nature
amended in its Nature; to 5th min = Act of nature) and future (the year).
The color sequence is the Aten {HRUMACHIS} which corresponds to each of the
Hebrew letters as a cycle of 22 days and to Akhenaten's use of it and its
common deployment that formed part of the understanding given of it within
Kabbalistic literature of the early 1900's--I have a suspicion that it might
have been used to effect the liquidation of several million jews as the
three codes of the enigma machine appears to be a conception of it.
This is a psychological model, in that it provides the mechansism for
effecting high order change without interrupting the status quo--in effect
bringing cosmos to chaos.
It is a gematric model, therefore if you intellectually place an object
within a matrix entry, I give the pointers for its association which then
may be used as a trump card for each day (ie. trumpe-de-jour).
This differs to the Chaldean symbolic and astrological interpretation given
of the taxonomy sequence which as stoicheion, provides the foundational
elements to this regulative philosophical numbering and encyclical knowledge
based system. It is traditionally supported by the use of magic squares
n(n?+1)/2 = #sum to which planetary associations were made: #3 (sum =
15CE) - Saturn; #4 (sum = 34CE) - Jupiter; #5 (sum = 65CE) - Mars; #6 (sum =
111CE) - Sun; #7 (sum = 175CE) - Venus; #8 (sum = 260CE) - Mercury; #9 (sum
= 369CE) - Luna. Theodore de Bry in 1582 CE, as his depiction of the
astronomer and scientist Tycho Brahe's (1546-1601 CE) Perpetual Calendar of
Natural Magic , represents each in a tabular form given as the 'Calendarium
Naturale Magicum Perpetuum Profunissimam Rerum Secretissimarum
Contemplationem Complectens of Tycho'.
Various forms of Magic were nebulously condemned by the Talmud but
permitted were those associated with the use of 'the Laws of Creation', a
term which was later interpreted to signify the mystical names of God and
the angels: "Moses Isserles (born 1520, Krakow, Poland died May 1, 1572 as
rabbi, philosopher and scholar who published a commentary on the Zohar was
considered the 'Maimonides of Polish Jewry') who brings us closer to an
understanding of what the forbidden 'magic' was. 'The roots of the [magical]
arts are three,' he wrote, 'God, science, and nature... From God comes...
the power to invoke the heavenly princes by means of the holy names; the
scientific root may be illustrated by astrology, by which a man can foretell
the future, make talismans, and subdue the spirits and the powers of the
stars and the like; on natural elements depends the effectiveness of the
various types of magic, all of which consist in bringing out the inner
nature of things, whereby an expert may perform deeds strange in
appearance...' This classification is not definitive, for Isserles failed to
include the demonic 'root' of magic which is thought obtained from
associations derived from the triangulation of number n(n+1)/2 as symbolic
transposition applied to the Tetragrammation of 'YHWH' and known as the root
of nature {A-U-M} or Tetractys, the 'Holy Four-fold Form. That is:
Yod (10) as 4(4+1)/2 = 10 {A = Fire} +
Yod (10) + He (5) as 5(5+1)/2 = 15 {U = Water} +
Yod (10) + He (5) + Vav (6) as 6(6+1)/2 = 21 {M = Air} +
Yod (10) + He (5) + Vav (6) + He (5) = 26 and total of 72 (ie. 472 BCE) [c.
57/58 CE in Romans 2:17-24 ] and existing prior to the year 457 BCE
(72J2W1D) from whence the Hebrews had made several population repatriations
to Jerusalem from Babylonian exile [c. 400 BCE in Ezra 2:1-2; Nehemiah
7:6-7; 450 BCE in Esther 9:6-15].
Rabbi Moses Isserles' inclusion of astrology, however well known in
Talmudic times, does not enter into the central discussions of magic,
despite the significant of the place of that science in particular and the
divinatory arts generally in medieval magic. [Joshua Trachtenberg, © 1939
Behrman's Jewish Book House, The Truth Behind the Legend, Jewish Magic and
Superstition, p 20 - 21]
I demonstrate a useage of it as a mechanism and encyclical architecture
underpinning Philo of Alexandria's use of Numbers within his literature:
<http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/bloodsport.html>
So far I have found it to be the most sublime of Kabbalistic notions.
- dolf
"israel t" <rambam@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:87brcgmthv.fsf@kafka.homenet...
"Qolon" <telos@bigpond.com> writes:
Your www-browser is capable of viewing the Javascript module as proof of
concept of what I have asserted in my posts.
- <http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/telos/kabbalah/grapple.html>
That is seriously , mind-blowingly impressive !
However, I dont understand it.
Is there a link to some documenation of that calendar.
.
|
