| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
03 Jan 2004 03:43:29 PM |
| Object: |
Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:34:59 -0600 (CST),
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
FACT: Many thousands of parents fit one or both of these
categories ---
(1) One or both of them is so intolerant, that if their daughter
were to reveal to them that she was pregnant, they would
FORCE her to gestate to term, even though the almost
certain outcome in the vast majority of such cases would be
a serious reduction or alteration of her future opportunities,
and in many cases would result in her suffering a lifetime of
poverty.
(2) One or both of them is so intolerant, that if their daughter
were to reveal to them that she was pregnant, they would
disown her and throw her out of the house.
And SOME of those parents would hatefully abuse her physically.
To AVOID such unthinkable and truly despicable ACTUAL injustices,
some of my regularly-repeated Resource Posts provide teens with the
information they need to access abortion hassle-free and privately,
WITHOUT taking such risks.
COUNT on my **always** being FAIR enough to dissiminate that
information, far, wide, and frequently.
Meanwhile, girls who can TRUST their parents NOT to react in the
above-described manners, are encouraged to allow their parents to HELP
them to solve the problem.
Hate-filled LOSERS like YOU are nothing short of appalling!
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: WHO PAYS |
30 Jan 2004 06:31:10 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:fr8e105r5m27b0pvnos2svep1updus8tja@Pern.rk...
***** Yes, I'll go for gender equality, worldwide! That's a great
idea, men
get a 50% say when their wives or girlfriends start talking
abortion!!!
As long as they take half the pregnancy.
***** The men are probably going to land up paying all the bills, while
madame enjoys a nice rest! That gets him a vote!
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Paying bills doesn't give one person
control of another person's body. Slavery is illegal.
***** No slavery involved, the woman gets a pleasant rest, the man works his
butt off to supply the cash!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: WHO PAYS |
30 Jan 2004 09:20:06 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:31:10 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za>
posted in alt.atheism:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:fr8e105r5m27b0pvnos2svep1updus8tja@Pern.rk...
***** Yes, I'll go for gender equality, worldwide! That's a great
idea, men
get a 50% say when their wives or girlfriends start talking
abortion!!!
As long as they take half the pregnancy.
***** The men are probably going to land up paying all the bills, while
madame enjoys a nice rest! That gets him a vote!
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Paying bills doesn't give one person
control of another person's body. Slavery is illegal.
***** No slavery involved
It is if you're trying to prevent a woman from doing something that
the law says she's entitled to do with no interference from you.
--
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says is never accurate because he
unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
-- Bertrand Russell.
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas P." |
|
| Title: Re: WHO PAYS |
30 Jan 2004 05:02:54 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:31:10 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za>
wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:fr8e105r5m27b0pvnos2svep1updus8tja@Pern.rk...
***** Yes, I'll go for gender equality, worldwide! That's a great
idea, men
get a 50% say when their wives or girlfriends start talking
abortion!!!
As long as they take half the pregnancy.
***** The men are probably going to land up paying all the bills, while
madame enjoys a nice rest! That gets him a vote!
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. Paying bills doesn't give one person
control of another person's body. Slavery is illegal.
***** No slavery involved, the woman gets a pleasant rest, the man works his
butt off to supply the cash!
And most women work outside the home and inside the home. When do
they get the "pleasant rest" you talk about? My mother had 7 children
and held a full-time job for more than 40 years. She certainly did
not have much of a rest. Your above statement does not have much to
do with the real world.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: WHO PAYS |
30 Jan 2004 09:21:07 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:02:54 +0100, Thomas P.
<tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> posted in alt.atheism:
Your above statement does not have much to do with the real world.
Most anti-choicers have little to do with the real world.
--
"He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my
contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him, the
spinal cord would fully suffice."
- Albert Einstein
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas P." |
|
| Title: Re: "Hate Feminism": Self-admitted ignorant Bigot. |
25 Jan 2004 03:15:43 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:00:40 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za>
wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:400b5789.47675145@netnews.mchsi.com...
"Which is why people who are in agreement with EQUALITY
between men and women are not "feminists" (modern term for
people haters)." --Pat Winstanley, 12 Jan 2004
Pat is entitled to her opinion, and she's almost always right.
However, in this country (the USA), woman are averaging around
75-80% of the pay for the SAME jobs that *men* are making. Perhaps
not in the UK; maybe Pat can let us know, since she lives there. And
just today, in the news, the point was made that there are many military
jobs (infantry, for one) from which women STILL are being excluded.
In some primitive Arabian societies, "honor killing" of women for utterly
absurd reasons actually is condoned!
UNTIL gender equality across-the-board has been achieved,
worldwide, there will be room for feminism.
***** Yes, I'll go for gender equality, worldwide! That's a great idea, men
get a 50% say when their wives or girlfriends start talking abortion!!!
I think the men should have 100% say as long as they are the ones who
are pregnant.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: "Hate Feminism": Self-admitted ignorant Bigot. |
27 Jan 2004 08:02:56 AM |
|
|
"Thomas P." <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:sdc810hku0narkpkat5s8c37ttaau6lku2@4ax.com...
"Which is why people who are in agreement with EQUALITY
between men and women are not "feminists" (modern term for
people haters)." --Pat Winstanley, 12 Jan 2004
Pat is entitled to her opinion, and she's almost always right.
However, in this country (the USA), woman are averaging around
75-80% of the pay for the SAME jobs that *men* are making. Perhaps
not in the UK; maybe Pat can let us know, since she lives there. And
just today, in the news, the point was made that there are many
military
jobs (infantry, for one) from which women STILL are being excluded.
In some primitive Arabian societies, "honor killing" of women for
utterly
absurd reasons actually is condoned!
UNTIL gender equality across-the-board has been achieved,
worldwide, there will be room for feminism.
***** Yes, I'll go for gender equality, worldwide! That's a great idea,
men
get a 50% say when their wives or girlfriends start talking abortion!!!
I think the men should have 100% say as long as they are the ones who
are pregnant.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
***** So Thomas, you must be a 'hen pecked' husband and your wife has all
the say? What happened to democracy?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: "Hate Feminism": Self-admitted ignorant Bigot. |
28 Jan 2004 03:23:21 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:02:56 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za>
wrote:
"Thomas P." <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:sdc810hku0narkpkat5s8c37ttaau6lku2@4ax.com...
"Which is why people who are in agreement with EQUALITY
between men and women are not "feminists" (modern term for
people haters)." --Pat Winstanley, 12 Jan 2004
Pat is entitled to her opinion, and she's almost always right.
However, in this country (the USA), woman are averaging around
75-80% of the pay for the SAME jobs that *men* are making. Perhaps
not in the UK; maybe Pat can let us know, since she lives there. And
just today, in the news, the point was made that there are many
military
jobs (infantry, for one) from which women STILL are being excluded.
In some primitive Arabian societies, "honor killing" of women for
utterly
absurd reasons actually is condoned!
UNTIL gender equality across-the-board has been achieved,
worldwide, there will be room for feminism.
***** Yes, I'll go for gender equality, worldwide! That's a great idea,
men
get a 50% say when their wives or girlfriends start talking abortion!!!
I think the men should have 100% say as long as they are the ones who
are pregnant.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
***** So Thomas, you must be a 'hen pecked' husband and your wife has all
the say?
Why she shouldn't have all to say as to what happens WITHIN her own
body?
What happened to democracy?
Since when is slavery democracy?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas P." |
|
| Title: Re: "Hate Feminism": Self-admitted ignorant Bigot. |
27 Jan 2004 02:03:31 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:02:56 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za>
wrote:
"Thomas P." <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:sdc810hku0narkpkat5s8c37ttaau6lku2@4ax.com...
"Which is why people who are in agreement with EQUALITY
between men and women are not "feminists" (modern term for
people haters)." --Pat Winstanley, 12 Jan 2004
Pat is entitled to her opinion, and she's almost always right.
However, in this country (the USA), woman are averaging around
75-80% of the pay for the SAME jobs that *men* are making. Perhaps
not in the UK; maybe Pat can let us know, since she lives there. And
just today, in the news, the point was made that there are many
military
jobs (infantry, for one) from which women STILL are being excluded.
In some primitive Arabian societies, "honor killing" of women for
utterly
absurd reasons actually is condoned!
UNTIL gender equality across-the-board has been achieved,
worldwide, there will be room for feminism.
***** Yes, I'll go for gender equality, worldwide! That's a great idea,
men
get a 50% say when their wives or girlfriends start talking abortion!!!
I think the men should have 100% say as long as they are the ones who
are pregnant.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
***** So Thomas, you must be a 'hen pecked' husband and your wife has all
the say? What happened to democracy?
Why do you have the right to tell another person what she has to do
with her body? What happened to democracy.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: "Hate Feminism": Self-admitted ignorant Bigot. |
25 Jan 2004 03:38:41 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:00:40 +0200, "Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za>
wrote:
"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:400b5789.47675145@netnews.mchsi.com...
"Which is why people who are in agreement with EQUALITY
between men and women are not "feminists" (modern term for
people haters)." --Pat Winstanley, 12 Jan 2004
Pat is entitled to her opinion, and she's almost always right.
However, in this country (the USA), woman are averaging around
75-80% of the pay for the SAME jobs that *men* are making. Perhaps
not in the UK; maybe Pat can let us know, since she lives there. And
just today, in the news, the point was made that there are many military
jobs (infantry, for one) from which women STILL are being excluded.
In some primitive Arabian societies, "honor killing" of women for utterly
absurd reasons actually is condoned!
UNTIL gender equality across-the-board has been achieved,
worldwide, there will be room for feminism.
***** Yes, I'll go for gender equality, worldwide! That's a great idea, men
get a 50% say when their wives or girlfriends start talking abortion!!!
I didn't realize men experienced pregnancies within their own bodies!
:-|
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "HateFeminism" |
|
| Title: Re: "Hate Feminism": Self-admitted ignorant Bigot. |
13 Jan 2004 02:45:47 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:33:30 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
One of us needs a LOT of help: you.
No, you do. You can't look facts in the face...
ROTFL!!! I present relevant facts all the time. You have
YET to provide even ONE that argues against safe & legal
abortion-on-request.
What a lunatic you are. Friggin lying *****.
Hmmm. ---
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes] ...
Yep! **You** certainly ARE!
Male feminist...
...and sensible egalitarian...
"Which is why people who are in agreement with EQUALITY
between men and women are not "feminists" (modern term for
people haters)." --Pat Winstanley, 12 Jan 2004
Pat is entitled to her opinion, and she's almost always right.
However, in this country (the USA), woman are averaging around
75-80% of the pay for the SAME jobs that *men* are making.
Liar. Where's your evidence?
OVERALL they make about 75% of what men do but not when you factor in
types of jobs worked, hours worked. (Can you believe the sexist feminist
liars leave out those things when they calculate their figures?)
When you compare the same jobs women earn about the same.
Perhaps
not in the UK; maybe Pat can let us know, since she lives there. And
just today, in the news, the point was made that there are many military
jobs (infantry, for one) from which women STILL are being excluded.
In some primitive Arabian societies, "honor killing" of women for utterly
absurd reasons actually is condoned!
So I'm a feminist because I think that's Bad.
No, I'm not talking about the things we don't need radical feminists to
tell us, moron. I'm talking about the ***** they seem to think they
need to educate other people about. Namely, their socialist anti-family
bullcrap, demonization of and extortion from men, and their pandering to
women at the expense of men.
We've all heard the anti-family, anti-motherhood, anti-male bullcrap from
those wackos so don't pretend you haven't. By doing this, you tacitly
support it!
UNTIL gender equality across-the-board has been achieved,
worldwide, there will be room for feminism.
There's no room for feminism in the West. And bougeouisie Western
feminists have little to say about women in the third world - haven't you
noticed? No; they're more concerned about getting allowed into Augusta
golf course! To say mnothing of all their other socialist, fascistic
bullcrap.
In fact, going by their stance on population control and abortion, it's
clear that the radical feminists are less concerned with immediate needs
of women in the third world and more concerned with imposing their elitist
white western imperialism.
Plus, even if they did advocate for women's rights in the third world
they'd still be sexist pigs. Afterall, men don't have it much better than
women in those countries! Have you ever heard them advocate on behalf of
men and boys with little or no rights and opportunities in those
countries? Answer: NO! It's always "women and girls".
As if all the men in those countries have it just great.... Stupid
bitches.
...Craig Chilton keeps snipping the facts which prove him
wrong.
Outright LIE. You have presented NO such facts. Not a single one.
I have snipped nothing but your red herrings, which in **no way**
contained any facts that argue against allowing women to have easy
access to safe & legal abortion-upon-request... NOR any relevant facts
that supports the Anti-Choicers' loathesome agenda against women's
right to access this valuable remedy.
You obviously haven't figured out this whole Usenet debate thing....
You don't snip another's argument then simply pronounce them as red
herrings and expect to get away with it. Well, not if you have an ounce of
intellect honesty.
To the contrary. You wandered off-topic,
Facts of human development are "off-topic"???
Ah, but of course you view any argument against abortion "off-topic". The
only thing on-topic is your pro-abortion propaganda about abortion
'empowering' women.
You're an intellectually dishonest coward.
so I called you on it, and
snipped your propagandistic red herring. Nothing requires ANY poster to
RETAIN propaganda from his opponents in HIS posts, thus *repeating*
that propaganda for the opponent. If people want to read the propaganda,
all they have to do it read the post that ha been put up by the opponent.
And if off the server, find it via Google.
This is talk.abortion. You can't just declare one side of the debate
"off-topic" and say they should go elsewhere and leave you wackos to spout
your propaganda in peace.
Frikkin coward. You're pathetic.
Sorry. I'm not doing your propagandizing for you. Spew that
garbage to your heart's content in your OWN posts, and that's where
it can stay.
Btw, you snip my "propaganda"; I never snip yours! Don't you ever wonder
why that is, moron???
And if *you* were intellectually honest, you wouldn't have presen-
ted that irrelevant red herring in the first place. Your challenge was
to come up with so much as even ONE single relevant FACT that
argues against allowing women to access safe and legal abortion-
upon-request. You ducked.
Here's that irrelevant "red herring" again. Just so the sane people out
ther can judge for themselves if there's anything in it relevant to the
abortion debate....
(Originally posted by Papa Jack in <388678B7.5AB35B29@geocities.com>):
Amicus Curiae
"The Unborn Person Is Also a Patient."
Presented by more than two hundred doctors, many of them members
of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, in a Friend
of the Court Brief filed before the United States Supreme Court.
**************************************************************
From conception the child is a complex, dynamic, rapidly
growing organism. By a natural and continuous process the
single fertilized ovum will, over approximately nine
months, develop into the trillions of cells of the new-
born. The natural end of the sperm and ovum is death
unless fertilization occurs. At fertilization a new and
unique being is created which, although receiving one-half
of its chromosomes from each parent, is really unlike
either.
About seven to nine days after conception, when there
are already several hundred cells of the new individual
formed, contact with the uterus is made and implantation
begins. Blood cells begin at 17 days and a heart as early
as 18 days. This embryonic heart which begins as a simple
tube starts regular pulsations at 24 days, which, in about
one week, smooth into a rhythmic contraction and expansion.
Straus, et al. have shown that the ECG on a 23 mm embryo
(7.5 weeks) presents the existence of a functionally
complete cardiac system.... All the classic elements of
the adult ECG were seen....
Commencing at 18 days the developmental emphasis is on the
nervous system even though other vital organs, such as the
heart, are commencing development at the same time. Such
early development is necessary since the nervous system
integrates the action of all other systems. By the end of
the 20th day the foundation of the child's brain, spinal
cord and entire nervous system will have been established.
By the 6th week after conception this system will have
developed so well that it is controlling movements of the
baby's muscles, even though the woman may not be aware
that she is pregnant. By the 33rd day the cerebral cortex,
that part of the central nervous system that governs motor
activity as well as intellect may be seen.
The baby's eyes begin to form at 19 days. By the end of
the first month the foundation of the brain, spinal cord,
nerves and sense organs is completely formed. By 28 days
the embryo has the building blocks for 40 pairs of muscles
situated from the base of its skull to the lower end of
its spinal column. By the end of the first month the
child has completed the period of relatively greatest
size increase and the greatest physical change of a
lifetime. He or she is ten thousand times larger than the
fertilized egg and will increase its weight six billion
times by birth, having in only the first month gone from
the one cell state to millions of cells.
By the beginning of the second month the unborn child,
small as it is, looks distinctly human. Yet, by this
time the child's mother is not even aware that she is
pregnant.
At the end of the first month the child is about 1/4
of an inch in length. At 30 days the primary brain is
present and the eyes, ears and nasal organs have
started to form. Although the heart is still incomplete,
it is beating regularly and pumping blood cells through
a closed vascular system. The child and mother do not
exchange blood, the child having from a very early
point in its development its own and complete vascular
system.
Earliest reflexes begin as early as the 42nd day. The
male penis begins to form. The child is almost 1/2 inch
long and cartilage has begun to develop. Even at 5 1/2
weeks the fetal heartbeat is essentially similar to that
of an adult in general configuration.
By the end of the seventh week we see a well propor-
tioned small scale baby. In its seventh week, it bears
the familiar external features and all the internal
organs of the adult, even though it is less than an
inch long and weighs only 1/30th of an ounce. The body
has become nicely rounded, padded with muscles and
covered by a thin skin. The arms are only as long as
printed exclamation marks, and have hands with fingers
and thumbs. The slower growing legs have recognizable
knees, ankles and toes.
The new body not only exists, it also functions. The
brain in configuration is already like the adult brain
and sends out impulses that coordinate the function of
the other organs. The brainwaves have been noted at 43
days. The heart beats sturdily. The stomach produces
digestive juices. The liver manufactures blood cells
and the kidneys begin to function by extracting uric
acid from the child's blood. The muscles of the arms
and body can already be set in motion.
After the eighth week no further primordia will form;
everything is already present that will be found in
the full term baby.1 As one author describes this
period: "A human face with eyelids half closed as
they are in someone who is about to fall asleep.
Hands that soon will begin to grip, feet trying their
first gentle kicks."
From this point until adulthood, when full growth
is achieved somewhere between 25 and 27 years, the
changes in the body will be mainly in dimension and
in gradual refinement of the working parts.
The development of the child, while very rapid, is
also very specific. The genetic pattern set down in
the first day of life instructs the development of
a specific anatomy. The ears are formed by seven
weeks and are specific, and may resemble a family
pattern. The lines in the hands start to be engraved
by eight weeks and remain a distinctive feature of
the individual.
The primitive skeletal system has completely devel-
oped by the end of six weeks. This marks the end of
the child's embryonic (from Greek, to swell or teem
within) period. From this point, the child will be
called a fetus (Latin, young one or offspring).
In the third month, the child becomes very active.
By the end of the month he can kick his legs, turn
his feet, curl and fan his toes, make a fist, move
his thumb, bend his wrist, turn his head, squint,
frown, open his mouth, press his lips tightly
together. He can swallow and drinks the amniotic
fluid that surrounds him. Thumb sucking is first
noted at this age. The first respiratory motions
move fluid in and out of his lungs with inhaling
and exhaling respiratory movements.
The prerequisites for motion are muscles and
nerves. In the sixth to seventh weeks, nerves and
muscles work together for the first time. If the
area of the lips, the first to become sensitive
to touch, is gently stroked, the child responds
by bending the upper body to one side and making
a quick backward motion with his arms. This is
called a total pattern response because it
involves most of the body, rather than a local
part. Localized and more appropriate reactions
such as swallowing follow in the third month.
By the beginning of the ninth week, the baby
moves spontaneously without being touched. Some-
times his whole body swings back and forth for a
few moments. By eight and a half weeks the
eyelids, and the palms of the hands become
sensitive to touch. If the eyelid is stroked,
the child squints. On stroking the palm, the
fingers close into a small fist.
In the ninth and tenth weeks, the child's
activity leaps ahead. Now if the forehead is
touched, he may turn his head away and pucker
up his brow and frown. He now has full use of
his arms and can bend the elbow and wrist
independently. In the same week, the entire
body becomes sensitive to touch.
The twelfth week brings a whole new range of
responses. The baby can now move his thumb in
opposition to his fingers. He now swallows regu-
larly. He can pull up his upper lip; the initial
step in the development of the sucking reflex.
By the end of the twelfth week, the quality of
muscular response is altered. It is no longer
marionette-like or mechanical - the movements
are now graceful and fluid, as they are in the
newborn. The child is active and the reflexes
are becoming more vigorous. All this is before
the mother feels any movement....
Every child shows a distinct individuality in
his behavior by the end of the third month. This
is because the actual structure of the muscles
varies from baby to baby. The alignment of the
muscles of the face, for example, follow an
inherited pattern.
Further refinements are noted in the third month.
The fingernails appear. The child's face becomes
much prettier. His eyes, previously far apart,
now move closer together. The eyelids close over
the eyes. Sexual differentiation is apparent in
both internal and external sex organs, and
primitive eggs and sperm are formed. The vocal
cords are completed. In the absence of air
they cannot produce sound; the child cannot cry
aloud until birth although he is capable of
crying long before.
The taste buds and salivary glands develop in
this month, as do the digestive glands in the
stomach. When the baby swallows amniotic fluid,
its contents are utilized by the child. The
child starts to urinate.
From the twelfth to the sixteenth week, the
child grows very rapidly. His weight increases
six times, and he grows to eight to ten inches
in height. For this incredible growth spurt
the child needs oxygen and food. This he
receives from his mother through the placental
attachment - much like he receives food from
her after he is born. His dependence does not
end with expulsion into the external environment.
We now know that the placenta belongs to the
baby, not the mother, as was long thought.
In the fifth month, the baby gains two inches in
height and ten ounces in weight. By the end of
the month he will be about one foot tall and will
weigh one pound. Fine baby hair begins to grow on
his eyebrows and on his head and a fringe of
eyelashes appear. Most of the skeleton hardens.
The baby's muscles become much stronger, and as
the child becomes larger his mother finally
perceives his many activities. The child's mother
comes to recognize the movement and can feel the
baby's head, arms and legs. She may even perceive
a rhythmic jolting movement - fifteen to thirty
per minute. This is due to the child hiccoughing
.... The doctor can already hear the heartbeat
with his stethoscope.
The baby sleeps and wakes just as it will after
birth. When he sleeps he invariably settles into
his favorite position called his "lie". Each baby
has a characteristic lie. When he awakens he moves
about freely in the buoyant fluid turning from side
to side, and frequently head over heel. Sometimes
his head will be up and sometimes It will be down.
He may sometimes be aroused from sleep by external
vibrations. He may wake up from a loud tap on the
tub when his mother is taking a bath. A loud concert
or the vibrations of a washing machine may also stir
him into activity. The child hears . . . his mother's
voice before birth.
In the sixth month, the baby will grow about two more
inches, to become fourteen inches tall. He will also
begin to accumulate a little fat under his skin and
will increase his weight to a pound and three-quarters.
This month the permanent teeth buds come in high in
the gums behind the milk teeth. Now his closed eyelids
will open and close, and his eyes look up, down and
sideways. Dr. Liley feels that the child may perceive
light through the abdominal wall. Dr. Stiff has noted
that electroencephalographic waves have been obtained
in forty-three to forty-five day old fetuses, and so
conscious experience is possible after this date.
In the sixth month, the child develops a strong mus-
cular grip with his hands. He also starts to breathe
regularly and can maintain respiratory response for
twenty-four hours if born prematurely. He may even
have a slim chance of surviving in an incubator. The
youngest children known to survive were between twenty
to twenty-five weeks old
***********************************************************
http://www.ohiolife.org/mqa/1-1.htm [link now dead]
Motion and Brief Amicus Curiae of Certain Physicians, Professors
and Fellows of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology
in Support of appellees, submitted to the Supreme Court of the
United States, October Term, 1971, No. 70-18, Roe v. Wade, and
No. 70-40, Doe v. Bolton. Prepared by Dennis J. Horan, et.al.
(The List of Amici contains the names of over 200 physicians.).
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Craig Chilton: Pro-abortion, Pro-feminazi |
12 Jan 2004 08:57:09 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:39:37 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Craig Chilton wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:44:06 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions
behind their parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please
help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
Typical kook.
That certainly DOES decribe you very well.
Actually -- MORE of a loon than *most* of your moronic ilk.
You need help - and fast.
Let's see now. *I* have the courage of my convictions to post under
my real name, thus standing firmly behind everything I write, on the
record. But *you* cower behind a silly alias -- which releases you from
all accountability for every hate-filled and vile thing you spew in here.
And *I* am a fair-minded egalitarian who steadfastly DEFENDS
individual liberties against the hateful bigots who seek to destroy them.
*yawn*
No surprise there! the LAST thing a person like you would be
interested in is defending the rights of other people. You're all about
TRASHING people.
Whereas *you* not only ARE one of those hateful bigots, but you are
so arrogant and stupid as to ADMIT to it in that moronic alias you chose
for yourself.
Why Hate Feminism?
Because you're a total moron.
Why Hate Feminism?
Because as Craig stated, you're a total moron. And might I add, you're
also a bigotted fool.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
11 Jan 2004 03:51:48 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:44:06 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Craig Chilton wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:26:10 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions
behind their parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please
help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
Typical kook.
That certainly DOES decribe you very well.
Actually -- MORE of a loon than *most* of your moronic ilk.
Agreeing with yourself again, Chilton?
You need help - and fast.
Let's see now. *I* have the courage of my convictions to post under
my real name, thus standing firmly behind everything I write, on the
record. But *you* cower behind a silly alias -- which releases you from
all accountability for every hate-filled and vile thing you spew in here.
And *I* am a fair-minded egalitarian who steadfastly DEFENDS
individual liberties against the hateful bigots who seek to destroy them.
*yawn*
Facts bore you. What a surpirse.
Whereas *you* not only ARE one of those hateful bigots, but you are
so arrogant and stupid as to ADMIT to it in that moronic alias you chose
for yourself.
Why Hate Feminism?
Because you're a bigotted sheep shagger, kiwi.
The Feministus hystericus is a sad, driven creature. It's natural habitat
is usually, but not limited to, Women's Studies departments, pro-choice
marches and abortion clinics. Feministus hystericus is not known to
reproduce due to its aversion both to men and simply being a woman. If by
some miracle it conceives, it prefers simply to kill what it regards as a
"parasite".
One of us needs a LOT of help: you.
No, you do. You can't look facts in the face or even begin to understand
why it's your side of the issue that attracts the truly warped filth of
humanity...
(Hatefeminism)
.
|
|
|
| User: "HateFeminism" |
|
| Title: Krisblake: Feministus hystericus |
11 Jan 2004 05:45:04 PM |
|
|
Hate Feminism 101:
-----------------
"How will the family unit be destroyed? ...[T]he demand alone will throw
the whole ideology of the family into question, so that women can begin
establishing a community of work with each other and we can fight
collectively. Women will feel freer to leave their husbands and become
economically independent, either through a job or welfare." -socialist
feminazi Roxanne Dunbar in "Female Liberation"
"Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice. Rape,
originally defined as abduction, became marriage by capture. Marriage
meant the taking was to extend in time, to be not only use of but
possession of, or ownership." --feminazi nutcase Andrea Dworkin
"In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape because
women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent" --
Catherine MacKinnon (a feminazi) in "Professing Feminism: Cautionary
Tales From The Strange World of Women's Studies"
"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of
the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process
that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males."
--man-hater extraordinaire (i.e. a prominent mainstream feminist) Mary
Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001.
"No woman should be authorised to stay at home and raise her children.
Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice,
precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make
that one."
-heterophobe Simone de Beauvoir, feminazi
---------------------------------------------------
The Feministus hystericus is a sad, driven creature. It's natural habitat
is usually, but not limited to, Women's Studies departments, pro-choice
marches and abortion clinics. Feministus hystericus is not known to
reproduce due to its aversion both to men and simply being a woman. If by
some miracle it conceives, it prefers simply to kill what it regards as a
"parasite".
-----
Krisblake wrote:
Why Hate Feminism?
Because you're a bigotted sheep shagger, kiwi.
What a witless fool you are, Disflake.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Krisblake: Feministus hystericus |
12 Jan 2004 07:59:21 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:45:04 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Hate Feminism 101:
[...]
Krisblake wrote:
Why Hate Feminism?
Because you're a bigotted sheep shagger, kiwi.
What a witless fool
I was being serious.
you are, Disflake.
I am "Krisblake," not "Disflake."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "alasatian" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 08:35:01 PM |
|
|
licker of the dicks of snakes may you die a lonely painful death far removed
from all of your comforting posters of Michael Jackson and Nsync
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
11 Jan 2004 01:18:52 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:35:01 -0500,
IGNORAMUS "alasatian" <wan_derny@lycos.com> wrote:
...nothing but utterly mindless tripe.
<tripe-snip>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 07:51:40 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:48:23 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:25:21 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
-- Craig Chilton < >
.
|
|
|
| User: "HateFeminism" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 03:23:33 PM |
|
|
Krisblake wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:48:23 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:25:21 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
Whereas I've never seen so much worthless bullcrap as to what YOU
contribute to this newsgroup every day.
Get a life, subimbecile...
-----------------------------------------
Why Hate Feminism....?
For the benefit of those brainwashed by feminist propaganda, the following
feminist quotes have had the words 'man' and 'women' replaced by 'Aryan',
'Jew', 'Blacks' etc. This is done to make it easier for those so
brainwashed to recognize the bigotry when they hear it.
"I believe that Aryans have a capacity for understanding and compassion
which a Jew structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot
have it. He's just incapable of it."
"All blacks are rapists and that's all they are."
"I feel that 'Jew-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that
the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is
oppressing them."
"And let's put one lie to rest for all time: the lie that Jews are
oppressed, too, by racism--the lie that there can be such a thing as
'Jewish liberation groups.' Oppression is something that one group of
people commits against another group, specifically because of a
'threatening' characteristic shared by the latter group--skin color, sex
or age, etc. The oppressors are indeed FUCKED UP by being masters, but
those masters are not OPPRESSED. Any master has the alternative of
divesting himself of sexism or racism--the oppressed have no
alternative--for they have no power--but to fight. In the long run, Aryan
Liberation will of course free Jews--but in the short run it's going to
cost Jews a lot of privilege, which no one gives up willingly or easily.
Racism is NOT the fault of the German--kill the Jew, not the Aryan."
"My feelings about Japanese are the result of my experience. I have little
sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the
handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in
his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I
simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and
yearnings were, simply don't matter."
"When an Aryan reaches orgasm with a Jew he is only collaborating with the
zionist system, eroticizing his own oppression..."
FROM 'An Aryan Dictionary'
*JEW: ... represents a variant of or deviation from the category of
humans. The first Jews were mutants... the Jewish race represents a
degeneration and deformity of the human.'
"Clearly you are not yet a free-thinking Aryan but rather one of those
Aryans who bounce off the Jew-dominated, Jew-controlled social
structures."
"Who cares how Jews feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have
had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is
our turn. My only comment to Jews is, if you don't like it, bad luck --
and if you get in my way I'll run you down."
"Blacks who are unjustly accused of rape can sometime gain from the
experience."
"Ninety-five percent of Aryan experiences are about being a victim. Or
about being an underdog, or having to survive..."
"If the classroom situation is very Jewish -- a large beginning class of
50 to 60 students, say, with few Aryan students -- I am likely to define
my task as largely one of recruitment...of persuading students that Aryans
are oppressed."
"We are, as a race, infinitely superior to blacks."
"No black man should be authorized to stay at home to raise his children.
Society should be totally different. Black men should not have that
choice,
precisely because if there is such a choice, too many black men will make
that one."
"The simple fact is that every white must be willing to be identified as a
Nazi to be fully Aryan."
(Thanks to Hanuman)
http://groups.google.ca/groups?selm=1Eh_9.11813%24G83.196%40sccrnsc04&output=gplain
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 05:48:22 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:23:33 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:48:23 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:25:21 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
Whereas I've never seen so much worthless bullcrap as to what YOU
contribute to this newsgroup every day.
And your bullcrap is any better, you angry *****?
.
|
|
|
| User: "HateFeminism" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 08:49:46 PM |
|
|
Krisblake wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:23:33 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:48:23 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:25:21 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
Whereas I've never seen so much worthless bullcrap as to what YOU
contribute to this newsgroup every day.
And your bullcrap is any better, you angry *****?
Apparently so, Disflake.
--
Q. Why Hate Feminism?
A. Feminist Hate:
"throw rocks at boys"....
As a wall poster, for 4 pounds, in the UK:
http://www.popartuk.com/humour/boys-are-stupid-st3241-poster.asp
As a refrigerator magnet from "Wicked Cool Stuff":
http://www.wickedcoolstuff.com/boarestthroa.html
As a night light on Yahoo:
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/cupidshut/boarestthroa2.html
As a wall clock...
http://www.giftapolis.com/boarestwaclt.html
As a hand-crafted handbag at a college-sponsored crafts fair:
http://www.dailyaztec.com/Archive/Current/opinion/opinion05.html
As a keychain:
http://www.stickergiant.com/page/sg/PROD/sk610
As a lapel button:
http://www.stickergiant.com/page/sg/PROD/sb855
As ankle socks (but that page seems to be down)...
(Thanks to M.Snyder)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
11 Jan 2004 12:48:22 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:49:46 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:23:33 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:48:23 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:25:21 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
Whereas I've never seen so much worthless bullcrap as to what YOU
contribute to this newsgroup every day.
And your bullcrap is any better, you angry *****?
Apparently so, Disflake.
Are you responding to me or this "Disflake" who does not post here?
.
|
|
|
| User: "HateFeminism" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
11 Jan 2004 01:29:50 AM |
|
|
Krisblake wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:49:46 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:23:33 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:48:23 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:25:21 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
Whereas I've never seen so much worthless bullcrap as to what YOU
contribute to this newsgroup every day.
And your bullcrap is any better, you angry *****?
Apparently so, Disflake.
Are you responding to me or this "Disflake" who does not post here?
Further evidence that you get confused easily....
Seriously, I'd say Disflake, but that requires more typing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
11 Jan 2004 01:52:51 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:29:50 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:49:46 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:23:33 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Krisblake wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:48:23 GMT, (Craig Chilton)
wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:25:21 +1300,
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
Whereas I've never seen so much worthless bullcrap as to what YOU
contribute to this newsgroup every day.
And your bullcrap is any better, you angry *****?
Apparently so, Disflake.
Are you responding to me or this "Disflake" who does not post here?
Further evidence that you get confused easily....
How so? You're responding to me with a message you wrote for Dislake.
Maybe it is you who is confusing me with one of imaginary object of
your sexual desires?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 09:47:36 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:51:40 -0500,
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
LOL!!! Thanks, Kris! And... I seriously doubt that ANY sensible
person would ever accord ANY credibility to that pathetic loser. He
is truly a sick joke.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Kelly" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 09:51:09 AM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton) wrote in
news:400e1d30.7666588@netnews.mchsi.com:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:51:40 -0500,
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a
sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
Actually I would think his problem is that he could never find himself in a
situation where he would need to argue his way into a condom.
LOL!!! Thanks, Kris! And... I seriously doubt that ANY sensible
person would ever accord ANY credibility to that pathetic loser. He
is truly a sick joke.
-- Craig Chilton < >
____
If you are so smart, then how come I broke you?
-Homer Simpson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "HateFeminism" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 03:27:05 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:51:40 -0500,
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
LOL!!! Thanks, Kris! And... I seriously doubt that ANY sensible
person would ever accord ANY credibility to that pathetic loser. He
is truly a sick joke.
It must be frustrating for you because I often do nothing *but* quote
imbeciles like you, "Cowpat" Winstanley and various feminazi scum.
Just read a few of my posts... you'll get the idea. I certainly contribute
more information than either of you two bozos. To say nothing of Disflake.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 05:30:53 PM |
|
|
HateFeminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
It must be frustrating for you because I often do nothing *but* quote
imbeciles like you, "Cowpat" Winstanley and various feminazi scum.
Nothing to offer but hate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "HateFeminism" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 09:02:46 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
HateFeminism <kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
It must be frustrating for you because I often do nothing *but* quote
imbeciles like you, "Cowpat" Winstanley and various feminazi scum.
Nothing to offer but hate.
Yep, that's it! There's nothing better than beating the crap out of
feminazi scum - other than doing it literally, that is.
:^)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: CRAIG CHILTON |
10 Jan 2004 05:49:38 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:27:05 +1300, HateFeminism
<kill.feminism@now.org> wrote:
Craig Chilton wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:51:40 -0500,
Krisblake <bambinasangels@juno.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" [the self-chosen alias of a true LOON
who is **dumb** enough to ADMIT that he's an ignorant
bigot, in ever post he writes], wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"HateFeminism" wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
A Cowardly, Anonymous loser that Patrick Humphrey
has determined is "Richy" spewed the following tripe:
Help! They're telling tenagers how to get abortions behind their
parents backs on a TEEN forum! Please help stop this injustice!
ROTFL!!!!!
"Injustice."
<TRIPE snipped... but thanks for remiding me that it's time
to refresh my many Resource Posts!>
What! You're saying I reminded you with "tripe" of what you
regularly post to these newsgroups as a "resource"?
I plead guilty!!
The "tripe" had nothing to do with what I posted. And everything to
do with the derisive treatment of relevant facts by both you and your
fellow submoron who miscast it on his web page.
But when Anti-Choicers LIE, it's never a surprise. having NO
relevant *facts* on their side, lying is what they are **most adept** at.
Take "HateFeminisms" ***** with a grain of salt. He's a sexually
frustrated individual who could not argue his way out of a condom.
LOL!!! Thanks, Kris! And... I seriously doubt that ANY sensible
person would ever accord ANY credibility to that pathetic loser. He
is truly a sick joke.
It must be frustrating for you because I often do nothing *but* quote
imbeciles like you...
You only vent in writing what you are unable to perform in the
bedroom. And even that's shitty.
.
|
|
| | | | |
